Next Article in Journal
How to Evaluate COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness—An Examination of Antibody Production and T-Cell Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Maternal Mental Health Symptom Profiles and Infant Sleep: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Deep-Learning-Based Thrombus Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Diagnosis and Challenges in Perinatal Health

by
Blanca Riquelme-Gallego
1,2,* and
Rafael A. Caparros-Gonzalez
1,2
1
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Granada, Avenida de la Ilustración nº 60 C.P., 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs, GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061399
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Factors Associated with Perinatal Health)
Perinatal health is a primary objective for health systems. The perinatal period is a sensitive time for both the mother and the fetus. During pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period, numerous physiological and psychological changes take place that can affect maternal and neonatal health. Therefore, there are numerous situations that may have an adverse impact during the perinatal period, which need to be assessed and diagnosed early [1].
Prenatal diagnosis refers to the set of tests that are performed during pregnancy in order to identify the presence of potential congenital defects in the fetus or maternal risk factors that may require strict controls throughout gestation. The early diagnosis of any congenital defect in the fetus allows the most appropriate measures to be taken, both during pregnancy and during delivery, to prevent unnecessary risks for the mother and child and to try to improve the prognosis of the newborn after birth [2]. In some cases, intrauterine treatment of certain congenital defects can nowadays be carried out. Likewise, in the presence of certain fetal pathologies, preparation for receiving the newborn by a multidisciplinary team can improve the postnatal prognosis of the newborn [3].
There are a series of conditions that increase the possibility of having a child with congenital defects or intrauterine growth disorders. These conditions or risk factors are the reason why, in addition to routine screening tests, it is advisable to carry out specific tests on certain pregnant women. Pregnant women meeting one or more of the following conditions should be considered as a high-risk pregnancy: a previous child with chromosomal abnormalities or other congenital defects, mother or father with a chromosomal abnormality, suffering from an X-linked disease, having a chronic disease such as diabetes or certain endocrine disorders, having a family history of malformations, chromosomal abnormalities or congenital metabolic disorders, suffering from an infection during pregnancy, twin pregnancy, maternal obesity, advanced maternal age (>35 years old), consuming drugs during pregnancy, being exposed to radiation or toxic products for work-related or temporary reasons, assisted reproductive techniques. The possibility of a pregnant woman with one or more of these conditions or having a fetus with a congenital defect is multiplied by a greater or lesser factor that depends on the altered condition detected [1,4,5,6]. Additionally, suffering from a mental health issue during the perinatal period (i.e., stress, anxiety, depression, psychopathological symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder) is a risk factor that can have a negative impact on the maternal health and the offspring [7].
A distinction should be made between “screening techniques” which only allow the assessment of a “risk index” for certain anomalies and “diagnostic techniques” capable of reliably identifying the congenital defect. They are also known as “screening” techniques, and their aim is to identify pregnancies that, although not associated with the risk factors mentioned, present a higher than expected “risk index”. The detection, by any of the procedures mentioned here, of a high risk of congenital defects makes it advisable to carry out a diagnostic test [8,9,10].
Why is it necessary to carry out “universal” screening techniques for chromosomal anomalies in the entire population? Firstly, because it is not justified to perform a diagnostic test on all pregnant women as a first option due to the risks involved; secondly, because of the high cost in terms of economic and health care resources involved; and thirdly, because a well-conducted screening will allow us to identify a subgroup of patients who will really benefit from an invasive test.
There are different screenings from which this most vulnerable subgroup can benefit: EBA screening, which detects about 90% of all chromosomal abnormalities; advanced screening by detecting fetal DNA in maternal blood; screening for risk of pre-eclampsia, among others [8].
Regarding prenatal diagnostic techniques, there are numerous tests, many of which are included in many health systems. The choice of the most appropriate one depends on the personal circumstances of the pregnant woman, the stage of pregnancy, and the congenital defect type to be identified. Some of them are the detection of chromosomal abnormalities through chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis, the detection of inherited genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis, metabolic diseases, or muscular dystrophies; the detection of fetal malformations or infections such as toxoplasmosis or rubella infections, among others [11,12,13,14,15,16].
Maternal and child health professionals need to be trained in the detection and screening of these potential pregnancy complications, as pregnancy is an excellent opportunity to detect these problems and their risk factors. This process requires an individualized approach, the involvement of the women concerned, and the up-to-date knowledge of professionals about the associated risk factors. In summary, the best intervention is to detect and prevent pregnancy complications and to help achieve satisfactory obstetric-perinatal outcomes.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meller, C.H.; Grinenco, S.; Aiello, H.; Córdoba, A.; Sáenz-Tejeira, M.M.; Marantz, P.; Otaño, L. Congenital Heart Disease, Prenatal Diagnosis and Management. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2020, 118, e149–e161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Parra-Saavedra, M.; Barrero-Ortega, A.; Parra-Anaya, G. Fetus in Fetu Prenatal and Postnatal Images. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 224, 310–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Samaniego Fernández, C.M.; Cancho Candela, R.; Centeno Malfaz, F. Severe Diseases with Prenatal Diagnosis. Cuad. Bioet. 2012, 23, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Sainz, J.A.; Zurita, M.J.; Guillen, I.; Borrero, C.; García-Mejido, J.; Almeida, C.; Turmo, E.; Garrido, R. Prenatal Screening of Congenital Heart Defects in Population at Low Risk of Congenital Defects. A Reality Today. An. Pediatr. 2015, 82, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Recio Rodríguez, M.; Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Thuissard-Vasallo, I.J.; Cano Alonso, R.; Bermejo López, C.; Tamarit Degenhardt, I.; Martínez Ten, P. Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis. Radiol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2020, 4085349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marín Soria, J.L.; González de Aledo Castillo, J.M.; Argudo Ramírez, A.; López Galera, R.M.; Pajares García, S.; Ribes Rubió, A.; García Villoria, J.; Yahyaoui Macías, R.; Álvarez Ríos, A.I.; Melguizo Madrid, E.; et al. Beginnings, Evolution and Current Situation of the Newborn Screening Programs in Spain. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 2021, 95, e202102041. [Google Scholar]
  7. Campos-Garzón, C.; Riquelme-Gallego, B.; de la Torre-Luque, A.; Caparrós-González, R.A. Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review. Behav. Sci. 2021, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cordisco, A.; Periti, E.; Antoniolli, N.; Lozza, V.; Conticini, S.; Vannucci, G.; Masini, G.; Pasquini, L. Clinical Implementation of Pre-Eclampsia Screening in the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 25, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jin, J. Screening for Gestational Diabetes. JAMA 2021, 326, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Blickstein, D. Screening for Thrombophilia. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2006, 33, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Isaak, A.; Ayub, T.H.; Merz, W.M.; Faron, A.; Endler, C.; Sprinkart, A.M.; Pieper, C.C.; Kuetting, D.; Dabir, D.; Attenberger, U.; et al. Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Acute Stage. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mastromoro, G.; Guadagnolo, D.; Khaleghi Hashemian, N.; Marchionni, E.; Traversa, A.; Pizzuti, A. Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges—Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vicoveanu, P.; Vasilache, I.A.; Scripcariu, I.S.; Nemescu, D.; Carauleanu, A.; Vicoveanu, D.; Covali, A.R.; Filip, C.; Socolov, D. Use of a Feed-Forward Back Propagation Network for the Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Newborns in a Cohort of Pregnant Patients with Thrombophilia. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Masselli, G. Fetal and Maternal Diseases in Pregnancy: From Morphology to Function. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kebbi-Beghdadi, C.; Aeby, S.; Baud, D.; Greub, G. Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Chlamydia Trachomatis in Vaginal Samples. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arbelaez, A.; Restrepo, F.; Davila, J.; Castillo, M. Congenital Brain Infections. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014, 23, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riquelme-Gallego, B.; Caparros-Gonzalez, R.A. Diagnosis and Challenges in Perinatal Health. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061399

AMA Style

Riquelme-Gallego B, Caparros-Gonzalez RA. Diagnosis and Challenges in Perinatal Health. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(6):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riquelme-Gallego, Blanca, and Rafael A. Caparros-Gonzalez. 2022. "Diagnosis and Challenges in Perinatal Health" Diagnostics 12, no. 6: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop