Next Article in Journal
Habitable Zones in Binary Star Systems: A Zoology
Next Article in Special Issue
Short-Term X-ray Variability during Different Activity Phases of Blazars S5 0716+714 and PKS 2155-304
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
X-ray and Gamma-ray Variability of NGC 1275
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

X-ray Flux and Spectral Variability of the TeV Blazars Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304

Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Manora Peak, Nainital 263001, India
Galaxies 2020, 8(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8030064
Submission received: 20 July 2020 / Revised: 22 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 4 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue X-Ray Flux and Spectral Variability of Blazars)

Abstract

:
We reviewed X-ray flux and spectral variability properties studied to date by various X-ray satellites for Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304, which are TeV emitting blazars. Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304 are the most X-ray luminous blazars in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively. Blazars show flux and spectral variabilities in the complete electromagnetic spectrum on diverse timescales ranging from a few minutes to hours, days, weeks, months and even several years. The flux and spectral variability on different timescales can be used to constrain the size of the emitting region, estimate the super massive black hole mass, find the dominant emission mechanism in the close vicinity of the super massive black hole, search for quasi-periodic oscillations in time series data and several other physical parameters of blazars. Flux and spectral variability is also a dominant tool to explain jet as well as disk emission from blazars at different epochs of observations.

1. Introduction

Blazar is a subclass of radio-loud (RL) active galactic nuclei (AGN) which includes BL Lacertae (BL Lacs) objects and flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs). Blazar’s central engine is a super massive black hole (SMBH) of the mass range 10 6 M –10 10 M that accretes matter and produces relativistic jets pointing almost in the direction of observer’s line of sight [1]. Blazars show flux, spectral and polarization variability on all possible timescales ranging from a few minutes to several years across the entire electromagnetic (EM) spectrum [2]. The emission from blazars in the complete EM spectrum is predominantly non-thermal. At lower energies (from radio to soft X-rays), the emission mechanism is certainly synchrotron radiation, while at high energies upto TeV energies the emission mechanism is probably due to inverse Compton (IC) emission e.g., [3], and a hadronic origin is also plausible e.g., [4].
Blazars are among only a few classes of astronomical objects which emit radiation in the entire EM spectrum which gives an excellent opportunity to study their multi-wavelength (MW) properties, plot the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and do the emission mechanism modeling. Blazar’s SEDs from radio to γ -rays have two humps in the log( ν F ν ) vs. log( ν ) representation [5]. Based on the location of the first peak of SED, blazars are classified into low-energy peaked blazars (LBLs) and high-energy peaked blazars (HBLs) [6]. In LBLs, the first hump of SED peaks in the near-infrared (NIR)/optical, and in the ultraviolet (UV) or X-rays for HBLs, while the second hump of SED usually peaks at GeV energies for LBLs and at TeV energies for HBLs. A more recent classification of blazars are suggested by [7] based on the first SED peak frequency i.e., synchrotron peak frequency, ν p e a k , and made the following classification: low synchrotron peak (LSP) blazars with ν p e a k 10 14 Hz; ISP (intermediate synchrotron peak) blazars with 10 14 < ν p e a k 10 15 Hz; and high synchrotron peak (HSP) blazars with ν p e a k 10 15 Hz.
Variability in blazars on timescales of a few minutes to less than a day is often known as micro-variability [8], intra-night variability [9] or intra-day variability (IDV) [10]; variability timescales from days to several weeks is called short timescale variability (STV), while variability on month to years timescales is known as long term variability (LTV) [11]. Blazars are highly variable objects, so variability can be studied throughout different flux phases which can be considered to be: outburst, pre/post outburst and the low-state.
TeV emitting blazars basically belong to HBLs or HSPs sub-classes. In early 2000, only six TeV blazars (Mrk 421, Mrk 501, 1ES 1426+428, 1ES 1959+650, PKS 2155-304, 1ES 2344+514) were known; see [11] for a summary of their properties. Thanks to the development of new γ -ray ground and space based facilities e.g., Fermi1, High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) e.g., [12,13,14], Major Atmospheric Gamma-ray Imaging Cerenkov (MAGIC) e.g., [15,16,17], Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) e.g., [18,19,20], etc. These facilities have a very strong impact and made a complete revolution in TeV γ -ray astronomy. To date, 70 TeV γ -ray emitting blazars have been discovered2. A few blazars including Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304 were predicted to be potential neutrino emitting objects on the basis of protons accelerated in the cores can produce neutrinos if the soft radiation background in the core is sufficiently high [21]. After one and half decade of the prediction, such a blazar TXS 0506+056 is discovered [22].
In the present work, we discuss in detail the flux and spectral variability properties studied to date by various X-ray satellites for Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304, which are TeV emitting HBL/HSP blazars. Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304 are the most luminous X-ray blazars in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 and Section 3, we describe in detail the review of results obtained by various studies to date for the blazars Mrk 412 and PKS 2155-304, respectively. Section 4 provides the summary of this work.

2. Review of Published Results

2.1. Mrk 421

Mrk 421 (B2 1101+384; α 2000.0 = 11 h 04 m 27.2 s and δ 2000.0 = + 38 12 32 ) at redshift z = 0.0308 [23] is one of the closest blazars with an intense point-like nucleus [24]. Mrk 421 was discovered as an object with blue excess in the First Byurakan Survey which turned out to be an elliptical galaxy with a bright nuclear source classified as BL Lac object as it has a featureless optical spectrum, strongly polarized and displayed variable optical and radio fluxes and has compact radio emission [23,25,26]. It is located at a distance of 134 Mpc (H 0 = 71 km s 1 Mpc 1 , Ω m = 0.27 , Ω λ = 0.73 ). It is classified as a HBL/HSP blazar because the synchrotron peak of its SED is higher than 0.1 keV [27]. By using various mass estimation methods, it is found that the mass of central SMBH of Mrk 421 is in the range of (2–9) × 10 8 M e.g., [24,28,29,30,31]. It was detected in the GeV energy band by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) on board the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO) [32,33]. It is the the first known extra-galactic TeV γ -ray emitting object [27] and has been repeatedly confirmed as a TeV emitting source by various ground-based γ -ray telescopes e.g., [34,35,36] and references therein. Mrk 421 is the brightest X-ray to γ -ray, emitting an extra-galactic object in the northern hemisphere.

2.1.1. Flux and Spectral Variability

Mrk 421 was simultaneously observed for about 2 days in X-ray in the energy range 0.1–26 keV by BeppoSAX and TeV γ -ray at energies 0.5–2 TeV by Whipple in April 1998. A large well correlated flare was observed in X-ray and γ -ray, which implied that X-ray and TeV photons derived from the same emitting region and from the same population of relativistic electrons [37]. A coordinated X-ray observation of Mrk 421 was carried out from April 1997–May 1997 using BeppoSAX and RXTE/ASM covering the energy range 0.1–100 keV. The source has shown significant flux and spectral variability on STV timescale and the spectrum in the energy range 0.1–100 keV has convex curvature which was interpreted in terms of synchrotron cooling [38]. In extensive ten pointed observations of the blazar in 1997–1998 with BeppoSAX in the energy range 0.1–26 keV, the following results were obtained: strong evidence of X-ray IDV, hard photons lag the soft ones by 2–3 ks, flare light curve is symmetric in the softest X-ray band but asymmetric at higher energies and the peak of the synchrotron component shifted to higher energies during the rising phase and then receded [39,40]. Flux and spectral variabilities of Mrk 421 using nine pointed observations taken from XMM-Newton from 25 May 2000 to 6 May 2004 were studied. On all epochs of observations the source has shown strong flux variability, and different variability patterns, e.g., on one occasion the observed flux variation was more than a factor of three at highest X-ray energies and accompanied by complex spectral variations with only a small time lag between the hard and soft photons. The 0.2–10 keV spectra was well fitted by a broken power-law [41]; spectrum were harder in a higher flux state, sometimes fitted by a broken power-law, and sometimes very complex which could not be fitted by a broken power-law or a continuously curved model [42,43,44]. By using four pointed XMM-Newton observations of Mrk 421 in November 2002, it was found that the source was highly variable, X-ray spectra were soft and steepened toward higher energies and hardness ratio plots displayed a clear harder-when-brighter trend [45]. During 2003–2004 observations of the source by Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), the light curves show the presence of flares with varying amplitudes on a wide range of timescales, and the X-ray spectrum becomes flatter [46]. Mrk 421 data were taken over nine years (1997–2005) with ASCA, RXTE, EUVE, BeppoSAX and XMM-Newton. The spectral evolution study of the source has shown that the SED has a lower peak at energies that vary in the range 0.1–10 keV while its X-ray spectrum is curved and fitted with a log-parabolic model [47]. In March 2001, a week long coordinated observation in 2–60 keV X-rays (RXTE), TeV γ -rays, and optical showed strong variations in both X-ray and γ -ray bands, which are highly correlated with zero time lag. The strong correlation further supports the standard model in which a unique electron population produces the X-rays by synchrotron radiation and the γ -ray component by IC scattering [48]. Simultaneous MW observations including X-rays in the energy range 0.3–200 keV by Swift/XRT, INTEGRAL and Swift/BAT, radio, optical and γ -rays were carried out for about 2 weeks in June 2006. Four strong flares at X-rays were observed that were not seen at other wavelengths (partially because of missing data). In 0.2–10 keV, data indicated a small correlation with the intensity which implied a hard-to-soft evolution but such correlation was missing in 20–150 keV [49]. In about a month long MW observing campaign in May–June 2008, in hard X-rays (20–60 keV) SuperAGILE resolved a five-day flaring event (9–15 June) which peaked at ∼55 mCrab. Data from SuperAGILE, RXTE/ASM and Swift/BAT have shown a correlated flaring structure between soft and hard X-rays. A Swift/XRT observation at flare detected the highest 2–10 keV flux ever observed from this source 2.6 × 10 9 ers cm 2 s 1 [50]. In X-ray observations taken during October 2005 to July 2006 in 0.2 to 50 keV, several episodic outbursts were seen [51]. Spectral and flux evolution of Mrk 421 was studied with Swift observations carried out during April to July 2006. In this period, the source exhibited both flux levels and SED peak energies each equal to their historic maximum until 2006. A possible signature of acceleration processes that produce curved electron distributions was found, and the curvature decreases as the acceleration becomes more efficient [52]. In a seven month long monitoring with the MAXI GSC, two strong X-ray flares from Mrk 421 were observed in 2–10 keV energy in January and February 2010. In a February 2010 flare the observed flux was 164 ± 17 mCrab, which was the highest among those reported from the object. A comparison of the MAXI and Swift BAT suggested a convex X-ray spectrum with photon index ∼ Γ 2 [53]. A MW observing campaign of Mrk 421 from 2006 January to 2008 June was coordinated. Flux variability in the blazar was found in all EM bands except for the radio wave band. The combing RXTE and Swift X-ray data show spectral hardening with increasing flux levels, and in general correlated with an increase of the source activity in the TeV γ -rays [35]. Coordinated observations with INTEGRAL, Fermi-LAT and optical ground-based telescopes on 16–23 April 2013 were carried out. Two strong flares were detected in 3.5–60 keV from INTEGRAL and 0.1–100 GeV from Fermi-LAT observations, and average flux in the 20–100 keV was ∼4.5 mCrab. The time resolved spectra was fitted by broken power-law which was marginally better than the log-parabolic model [54]. In coordinated observations of Mrk 421 between January 2009 and June 2009, a harder-when-brighter behavior in the X-ray spectra was found which also showed a strong correlation without any time lag between VHE γ -rays and X-ray fluxes [55]. In Mrk 421, a flare occurred in March 2010 and was observed for 13 continuous days in the complete EM spectrum from VHE γ -rays to radio bands. A remarkable flux variability was detected in X-ray and VHE γ -rays which slowly decreased from high to low flux states [56]. An unprecedented double peaked outburst from 10–16 April 2013 was detected with NuSTAR observation in 3–79 keV energies in which the first flare appears to have nearly a Gaussian shape with peak flux at ∼MJD 56395, while the second one, occurring two days later, was even stronger with sharp rise and decay [57]. NuSTAR observations were carried out in the historical low-flux state of Mrk 421 in 2013 January, and for the first time a clear detection of a hard X-ray excess, above ≥20 keV was found [58]. A MW variability and correlated variability of Mrk 421 was carried out during exceptional X-ray flaring observed from 11–19 April 2013. Substantial flux variations on multi-hour and sub-hour timescales were observed in X-ray and γ -ray bands. Various X-ray and γ -ray bands were found to be well correlated without any time lag [59]. A detailed X-ray IDV study was carried out for Mrk 421 with 72 pointed observations from Chandra taken from 2000–2015 and 3 pointed observations from Suzaku taken during its whole operational period. Large amplitude IDV in soft and hard X-ray bands was detected. Variability time-scales ranging from 5.5 to 78.1 ks appeared to be present. Hard and soft bands were well correlated with zero time lag, and in general harder-when-brighter trend in the spectral behavior was found [31,60]. In hardness ratio (HR) versus X-ray flux plots, we noticed a clockwise as well as anti-clockwise loop at different epochs of observations which implied that particle acceleration as well as synchrotron cooling both work in the source at different epochs of observations [60]. In a systematic study of the 16 year whole operation period of RXTE, 32 TeV blazar spectra were analyzed. From photon spectral index ( α ), flux, synchrotron radiation peak energy (E p ), electron spectral index (p) and HR, it was found that when considering TeV blazars as a whole, α and X-ray luminosity are positively correlated, E p is negatively correlated with p and α and E p is positively correlated with HR [61].

2.1.2. Power Spectrum Analysis

For three pointed observations of Mrk 421 with ASCA, the power spectrum density (PSD) was plotted. The best power-law slope ( α value varies from 2.03 to 2.56, while on one occasion broken power-law was also fitted [62]. Observation of the source with MAXI on another occasion was fitted with power-law slope α = 1.60, and was also fitted with broken power-law [63]. A MW observing campaign of Mrk 421 was organized between January 2009 and June 2009, which included data from VLBA, F-GAMMA, GASP-WEBT, Swift, RXTE, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC and Whipple. PSD analysis on all wave bands were done and found that all PSDs can be described by power-laws without a break which is consistent with red noise behavior [55]. In 3 pointed X-ray observations with XMM-Newton on 2014 April 29, May 1–3, PSD distribution was at ≥4 × 10 4 Hz and described by a power-law model with slope α = 1.2 to 1.8 [64]. PSD analysis of long term RXTE and Swift X-ray observations of Mrk 421 were well fitted with power-law. For RXTE and Swift X-ray light curves, the PSD slopes were found to be 1.1 ± 1.6 and 1.3 ± 0.7, respectively [65].

2.1.3. Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs)

Simultaneous X-ray and γ -ray emission modeling of Mrk 421 revealed the first evidence for bulk jet Lorentz factors of the order of 50 [66]. About a decade long X-ray observations of Mrk 421 with BeppoSAX, XMM-Newton and Swift satellites in the energy range from 0.1 to over 100 keV were carried out. The X-ray SED in different flux states was well fitted with a log-parabolic model which also provided the good estimates of the energy and flux of the synchrotron peak in the SED. The peak synchrotron energy varies between 0.1–10 keV with different flux states [67,68]. Multi-wavelength data taken at different flux states suggested that both SED peaks move to higher energies as the luminosity of the source increases; the measured SEDs failed to fit with one-zone synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model, and then by introducing an additional zone improves the fits [46]. In MW data taken from radio to γ -ray bands in 2002 December to 2003 January, SED is fitted with an SSC model with very high Doppler factors and low magnetic fields [69]. In a week long MW campaign of Mrk 421 in March 2001, IDV on ≈30 min was found in VHE (>200 GeV γ -rays), which was correlated with X-rays, but not with the optical; the fractional variability increases from optical to X-rays as a power-law. SED was well-fitted by the SSC model from cooling electrons injected with a Maxwellian distribution of characteristic energy [70]. Simultaneous MW SED during 2 weeks of observations in June 2006 were fitted using a one-zone SSC model including the full Klein–Nishina cross section for IC scattering [49]. Simultaneous MW observations of Mrk 421 were carried out for two X-ray flarings in 2006 and 2008 in which SEDs were modeled using a leptonic model given by [71]. It was found that a pure SSC model provides a good match to the SEDs during both observations [72]. A 4.5 month long multifrequency observational campaign was carried out for Mrk 421 in 2009 with VLBA, Swift, RXTE, MAGIC, the F-GAMMA, GASP-WEBT and other collaborations. During this campaign, the blazar showed a low flux activity at all wavelengths. The MW SED was produced with a leptonic (one-zone SSC) and a hadronic model (synchrotron proton blazar) [73]. In the MW observing campaign of Mrk 421 from 2006 January to 2008 June, SED was generated for 18 nights and well fitted by a one-zone SSC model [35]. An intense MW monitoring of Mrk 421 was conducted from December 2007 until June 2008 with MAGIC-I, Swift/XRT, Swift/UVOT and other ground based data in radio and optical bands. In the obtained SED interpreted within the framework of a single-zone SSC leptonic model, a high Doppler factor (40 δ 80) was needed to reproduce the observed SED [74]. A detailed investigation of the electron energy distributions (EEDs) and the acceleration processes in the jet of Mrk 421 was carried out through fitting the SEDs in different flux states in the frame of the one zone SSC model. It was found that the shock acceleration is dominant in the low flux state, while stochastic turbulence acceleration is dominant in the flare state [75]. The pre-flaring state of Mrk 421 on 22–23 March 2001 was observed in MW and its SED was generated and fitted with so-called (lepto)hardronic models which are routinely used to model MW observations of HBL/HSP blazars. Using the “leptohadronic pion” (LH π ) model, the X-rays are produced from the synchrotron radiation of a primary leptonic component while the γ -rays are pion induced. In the “leptohadronic synchrotron” (LHs) model, the X-rays are produced as from the synchrotron radiation while the γ -rays are produced by proton synchrotron radiation [76]. In a continuous 13 day observation in March 2010, the one-zone SSC model can describe the SED of each day for the 13 consecutive days reasonably well while the flaring state was better described by a two-zone SSC model [56]. In an unprecedented double peaked outburst during 10–16 April 2013 observed by NuSTAR in the energy range 3–79 keV, the observed X-ray spectrum showed a clear curvature that was fitted by a log parabolic spectral form and is explained as originating from a log parabolic electron spectrum [77]. Coordinated MW observations of Mrk 421 from radio to γ -ray energies during January–March 2013 were basically a quiescent state of the source [78] before an unprecedented double peaked X-ray outburst was observed by NuSTAR from 10–16 April 2013 [57]. Both the synchrotron and IC peaks of the SED simultaneously shifted to frequencies below the typical quiescent state by an order of magnitude [78]. Three days of coordinated X-ray and γ -ray observations on 2014 April 29, May 1–3 also included radio and optical archive data for broadband SED generation, and the SED was found to be consistent with a one-zone SSC model [64].

3. PKS 2155-304

PKS 2155-304 (H 2155-304; α 2000.0 = 21 h 58 m 52.07 s and δ 2000.0 = 30 13 32.1 ) was one of the first recognized BL Lac objects and was discovered as an X-ray source by the HEAO 1 X-ray satellite [79,80,81]. It is like most other BL Lac objects associated with a compact, flat spectrum radio source, and has an almost featureless continuum from radio to X-ray energies. It is the most luminous object from UV to TeV γ -ray energies in the southern hemisphere. The redshift of PKS 2155-304 was estimated to be z = 0.116 ± 0.002 by optical spectroscopy of the galaxies in the field of the BL Lac object [82]. EGRET on board the CGRO detected γ -ray emissions from the source in the energy range from 30 MeV to 10 GeV [83]. It was detected in TeV γ -ray energies by observations from Durham Mark 6 Telescopes [84].

3.1. Flux and Spectral Variability

EXOSAT observed PKS 2155-304 in X-ray energies at nine epochs in 1983–1985. Quasi-simultaneous observations of the source were also carried out in far-UV with IUE and optical/NIR with ESO telescopes. On two occasions the rapid flux rising was observed with a doubling time ∼1 h, and the X-ray spectra in the energy range (1–10 keV) were well fitted with single power-law plus absorption [85]. Detailed hard X-ray properties of PKS 2155-304 based on observations were made in 1988 and 1999 with the Large Area Counter (LAC) on board the Ginga satellite. The source exhibited large variability of a factor of 7 in the energy range 2–6 keV. The intensity decline of a factor of 2 in amplitude within 4 h in this energy range. The X-ray spectrum characterized by a break at ∼4 keV and it hardens as the intensity increases [86]. Extensive ROSAT PSPC observations of the source taken during 12–15 November 1991 revealed that it was in a bright flux state, and rapid X-ray flux variation upto 30% in a day was detected. The soft X-ray flux was correlated with simultaneous UV flux taken with IUE, and the soft X-ray spectrum remained unchanged during the whole duration of observations. Individual ROSAT PSPC spectra was well fitted with single power-law with photon index Γ 2.65 [87]. A simultaneous MW observing campaign of PKS 2155-304 was carried out in November 1991 in X-ray, UV, optical, IR and radio bands. Fluxes in X-ray, UV and optical bands were strongly correlated, with the X-ray leading UV, optical by 2–3 h. UV and Optical fluxes showed variation of a factor of ∼2 in a week time, while X-ray/UV/optical showed ∼10% changes in flux in a few hours [88]. In a 10 day simultaneous MW campaign of the blazar in May 1994, the source was observed in X-rays by ASCA and ROSAT X-ray satellites. The X-ray light curve showed a well-defined X-ray flare. The X-ray flare observed with ASCA showed a factor of 2 flux increase in about half a day and decayed roughly as fast [89]. In 100 ks observations with BeppoSAX in the energy range 0.1–100 keV, the source was detected in an intermediate intensity level compared to previous observations. A number of spectral features detected with observation which was well described by a convex spectrum with (energy), and slope gradually steepening from 1.1 to 1.6 [90]. A pointed observation of the source from BeppoSAX was carried out continuously for about 1.5 days beginning on 22 November 1997. The light curves indicated that the X-ray flux was close to the highest detected level and higher by a factor of 2 than that observed by BeppoSAX in 1996. The X-ray spectra showed a curved continuum, with no evidence of spectral features, extended up to ∼50 keV [90,91,92]. Four pointed observations of PKS 2155-304 were carried out during 1994–1999 with ASCA and BeppoSAX. On a timescale of less than an hour, no large amplitude-variability event was detected, the light curves in different X-ray energy bands were found to be highly correlated without any time lag and the amplitude of variability increased with energy [93,94]. Time-resolved spectra fitted with a curved model suggested that the peak position of synchrotron emission shift to higher energy with increasing flux, spectral changes are complicated and there were no clear correlations of spectral slope versus flux and between spectral slopes at different energies [94]. Extensive X-ray studies of PKS 2155-304 with XMM-Newton satellite data were carried out in a series of papers [95,96,97]. Extensive study of XMM-Newton provided the following results: (i) the excess variance (absolute rms variability amplitude) and the fractional rms variability amplitude show linear correlation with source flux, (ii) using the normalized excess variance, the black hole mass of PKS 2155-304 was estimated to be 1.45 × 10 8 M , (iii) the hardness ratio versus flux plots showed that the spectral changes were mainly significant during flares, (iv) the cross-correlation of the light curves in different energies were well correlated with different time lags, (v) the source has shown large amplitude X-ray IDV [95,96,97]. By using 20 XMM-Newton archival observations of PKS 2155-304 taken from 2000 to 2012, long term flux and multi-band cross-correlated variabilities were studied. Significant flux variations were observed in all optical, UV and X-ray energies. Optical and UV bands data were well correlated while soft and hard X-ray energies light curves were well correlated which suggests that the optical/UV and X-ray emissions in this source may arise from different lepton populations [98]. There were three continuous pointed observations of PKS 2155-304 on 24 May 2002 with XMM-Newton. These observations display a mini–flare, a nearly constant flux period, a strong flux increase. A time resolved cross-correlation analysis between different X-ray bands detected significant hard and soft lags (for the first time in a single observation of this source) [99].

3.1.1. Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs)

A simultaneous MW observing campaign of PKS 2155-304 was carried out in November 1991, and SED was tried to fit with various standard models e.g., the synchrotron/Compton models, accretion disk model and gravitational lensing model. None of these model could satisfactorily explain the findings [88]. The broad band SED generated with the MW campaign of the blazar in May 1994 was fitted with various models. The SED temporal profile fitted with the synchrotron emission from an inhomogeneous, relativistic jet [89]. A simultaneous MW observation on 22 November 1997 broad band SED was well fitted with a one-zone SSC model [92]. Using two X-ray pointed observations of the source with XMM-Newton, the first evidence of IC X-ray emission below 10 keV from the source was found, spectra in 0.6–10 keV harden ( Δ Γ 0.1–3) at break energy ∼4 keV, and the quasi-simultaneous optical/UV/X-ray SEDs suggested concave X-ray spectra of the source [100]. In an MW campaign from the radio to X-ray bands in 1994 May, a time-dependent SSC model for flare provided B ∼0.1–0.2 G, and relativistic beaming with a Doppler factor of δ 20–30 [101]. MW observations of PKS 2155-304 by the Swift satellite and other EM band data from ground-based telescopes at the end of 2006 July reported the dramatic increase in TeV flux; the X-ray flux changed by a factor 5 without a large spectral change. SED modeling based on the SSC process in a homogeneous region suggested the Doppler factor δ = 33 [102]. An MW observing campaign of PKS 2155-304 was conducted from 25 August 2008 to 6 September 2008 with Fermi, HESS, RXTE, Swift and ATOM. Contrary to previous findings in flaring state, no strong correlation was found in X-ray and VHE γ -rays, although the SSC model nicely fitted MW SED [103]. The two week long MW observations of the blazar in July and August 2006 was the period when two exceptional VHE γ -ray flares occurred. X-ray and VHE γ -ray emission were found to be correlated during the observed flaring state of the source. The nightly averaged high-energy spectra of the non-flaring nights were reproduced by a stationary one-zone SSC model, with only small variations in the parameters. The spectral and flux evolution in the high-energy band during the night of the second VHE flare were modeled with the multi-zone SSC model [104]. By using 20 XMM-Newton archival observations of PKS 2155-304 taken from 2000 to 2012, simultaneous optical, UV and X-ray SEDs were generated for individual observation. The SEDs were fitted well with the power-law + log-parabola (PLLP) model [98]. X-ray emission of PKS 2155-304 during different flux states in 2009–2014 were studied with XMM-Newton archive data. Spectral curvature of most of the observations showed curvature or deviation from a single power-law and can be well modeled by a log parabola model [105].

3.1.2. Power Spectrum Analysis

In three EXOSAT observations of PKS 2155-304 when it was in a flaring state, 6–7 November 1984 and 24 October 1985, PSDs were calculated and an average power-law slope of about −2.5 was obtained for the energy range 1–6 keV [106]. A detailed PSD analysis of the X-ray light curves of PKS 2155-304, observed with BeppoSAX and ASCA in 1994 to 1999 was carried out. From ASCA, pointed observations of the source were carried out for continuous ∼50 h on 19–21 May 1994, while BeppoSAX pointed observations were carried out for ∼60 h on 20–22 November 1996, ∼35 h on 22–24 November 1997 and ∼62 h on 4–6 November 1999. PSDs were fitted with power-law and their slopes were found to be in the range of 1.54 ± 0.07 to 3.10 ± 0.76 [93,94]. A detailed PSD analysis was carried out for fifteen pointed observations of PKS 2155-304 with XMM-Newton in the energy range (0.3–10 keV) taken from 2000 to 2008. PSDs fitted with power-law and with a large range of the slope from −3.52 ± 0.76 to −1.10 ± 0.48 were estimated [107,108]. On another occasion, PSD analyses of eleven pointed observations of PKS 2155-304 with XMM-Newton were conducted in the energy range 0.2–10 keV since its launch to 2011. PSDs were well fitted with power-law, and their slopes were found in the range of 2.1–2.3 [109]. PSD analysis of long term Swift X-ray observations of PKS 2155-304 fitted well with power-law, and its slope was found to be 1.3 ± 2.1 [65].

3.1.3. Quasi Periodic Oscillation (QPO)

Detection of periodic and/or quasi periodic oscillation (QPO) in the light curve of blazars is very rare and occasional e.g., see for review [110,111], and references therein. PKS 2155-304 is one of a few blazars which have shown evidence of QPO detection on diverse timescales in some EM bands. International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) observations of PKS 2155-304 in UV band have shown a short lived QPO of period ∼0.7 day [112]. Using ∼17 years of miscellaneous data in optical UBVRI bands, evidence of QPO detection with a period of 4 and 7 years was found [113]. A strong evidence of ∼4.6 h QPO was found in the source in XMM-Newton observations made on 1 May 2006 [107], and on another occasion a weak QPO in the source with period 5.5 ± 1.3 ks was reported in a XMM-Newton observation made on 24 May 2002 [108]. Using the X-ray QPO period of 4.6 h, the super massive black hole mass for PKS 2155-304 was found to be 3.29 × 10 7 M for a non-rotating (Schwarschild) black hole and 2.09 × 10 8 M for a maximally rotating (Kerr) black hole [107]. Using long term optical/NIR inhomogeneous data collected from various archive and published literature, QPO was detected of ∼315 ± 5 days on a few occasions [114,115,116]. Using Fermi-LAT observations in 100 MeV–300 GeV taken from August 2008 to May 2014, a γ -ray QPO with period of ∼642 days was estimated [116]. Using a longer data train of Fermi-LAT taken from August 2008 to 2016 October, γ -ray QPO with a period of 1.74 ± 0.13 years was detected [117] which confirmed the QPO detection period of [116]. This is possibly the only evidence of QPO detection in optical polarization with the period of 13 min in the source which is the only optical polarized QPO detection in any AGN to date [118].

4. Summary

Flux and spectral variability of blazars is one of the most frequently used tools to understand the emission mechanisms responsible in different EM bands at different flux states, to determine size of emitting, estimating central super massive black hole mass, cross correlated flux variability, spectral variation and the geometry of the local regions. In the present work we have extensively searched for the important results mainly based on X-ray flux and spectral variabilities of the blazars Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304. The results of both of these blazars are summarized below.
X-ray flux variability of both of these blazars is very complex, with patterns changing from epoch to epoch, and also depending on their flux states.
In general, the X-ray spectra of both of these blazars is well fitted by log-parabolic model.
In both the blazars, X-ray spectra in general harden with increasing flux but occasionally the opposite trend is also found.
In both the blazars, X-ray spectra has shown convex curvature which was interpreted in terms of synchrotron cooling.
Synchrotron SED hump of both of these blazars peaking from 0.1 to 10 keV depending on their flux state of the source.
PSDs of X-ray light curves of both of these blazars are red noise dominated and in general well fitted with power-law, but occasionally broken power-law can give a better fit.
On some occasions, for both the blazars, well correlated flare in X-ray and γ -ray are found which implied that X-ray and γ -ray photons derived from the same emitting region and from the same population of relativistic electrons. Such correlation further supports the standard model in which a unique electron population produces the X-rays by synchrotron radiation and the γ -ray component by IC scattering.
For both the blazars, even in general for TeV emitting blazars, hardness ratio (HR) versus X-ray flux shows a clockwise and anti-clockwise loop which implies particle acceleration as well as synchrotron cooling work at different epochs of observation.
For both the blazars, even in general for TeV emitting blazars, it is found that photon spectral index ( α ) and X-ray luminosity are positively correlated, synchrotron radiation peak energy (E p ) is negatively correlated with electron spectral index (p) and α and E p is positively correlated with HR.
For high and rapid γ -ray flux variability, an extremely high value of Doppler factor (40 δ 80) was needed for Mrk 421.
For high and rapid γ -ray flux variability, a high value of Doppler factor upto 30 was needed.
In general, the MW SEDs of both of these blazars are well fitted with the one-zone SSC model.
In unprecedented X-ray flare detection in both these blazars, the SEDs are better fitted with two-zone SSC model.
On some peculiar variable nature of light curves, the combination of SSC, EC and IC models may better explain MW SEDs of both of these blazars.
When Mrk 421 shows unprecedented strong γ -ray emission, then the MW SED is better explained by leptohadronic pion and/or the leptohadronic synchrotron model.
Hard X-ray excess above ≥20 keV was detected in Mrk 421.
PKS 2155-304 is one of a few blazars which has shown QPOs on diverse timescales in different EM bands.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I thankfully acknowledge the reviewers for very useful comments which helped to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Urry, C.M.; Padovani, P. Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei. PASP 1995, 107, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ulrich, M.H.; Maraschi, L.; Urry, C.M. Variability of Active Galactic Nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 35, 445–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Krawczynski, H. TeV blazars—Observations and models. New Astron. Rev. 2004, 48, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mücke, A.; Protheroe, R.J. A proton synchrotron blazar model for flaring in Markarian 501. Astropart. Phys. 2001, 15, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ghisellini, G.; Villata, M.; Raiteri, C.M.; Bosio, S.; de Francesco, G.; Latini, G.; Maesano, M.; Massaro, E.; Montagni, F.; Nesci, R.; et al. Optical-IUE observations of the gamma-ray loud BL Lacertae object S5 0716+714: Data and interpretation. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 327, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  6. Padovani, P.; Giommi, P. The Connection between X-Ray– and Radio-selected BL Lacertae Objects. Astrophys. J. 1995, 444, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Agudo, I.; Ajello, M.; Aller, H.D.; Aller, M.F.; Angelakis, E.; Arkharov, A.A.; Axelsson, M.; Bach, U.; et al. The Spectral Energy Distribution of Fermi Bright Blazars. Astrophys. J. 2010, 716, 30–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Miller, H.R.; Carini, M.T.; Goodrich, B.D. Detection of microvariability for BL Lacertae objects. Nature 1989, 337, 627–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sagar, R.; Wiita, P.J. A search for intra-night optical variability in radio-quiet QSOs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1993, 262, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wagner, S.J.; Witzel, A. Intraday Variability in Quasars and BL Lac Objects. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1995, 33, 163–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, A.C.; Banerjee, D.P.K.; Ashok, N.M.; Joshi, U.C. Near infrared intraday variability of Mrk 421. Astron. Astrophys. 2004, 422, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hofmann, W.; H.E.S.S. Collaboration. Status of the H.E.S.S. Project. In Proceedings of the 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, 31 July–7 August 2003; Volume 5, p. 2811. [Google Scholar]
  13. Funk, S.; Hermann, G.; Hinton, J.; Berge, D.; Bernlöhr, K.; Hofmann, W.; Nayman, P.; Toussenel, F.; Vincent, P. The trigger system of the H.E.S.S. telescope array. Astropart. Phys. 2004, 22, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.G.; Bazer-Bachi, A.R.; Beilicke, M.; Benbow, W.; Berge, D.; Bernlöhr, K.; Boisson, C.; Bolz, O.; Borrel, V.; et al. Observations of the Crab nebula with HESS. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 457, 899–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baixeras, C.; Bastieri, D.; Bigongiari, C.; Blanch, O.; Blanchot, G.; Bock, R.; Bretz, T.; Chilingarian, A.; Coarasa, J.A.; Colombo, E.; et al. Commissioning and first tests of the MAGIC telescope. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2004, 518, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cortina, J.; Armada, A.; Biland, A.; Blanch, O.; Garczarczyk, M.; Goebel, F.; Majumdar, P.; Mariotti, M.; Moralejo, A.; Paneque, D.; et al. Technical Performance of the MAGIC Telescope. In Proceedings of the 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC29), Pune, India, 3–11 August 2005; Volume 5, p. 359. [Google Scholar]
  17. Albert, J.; Aliu, E.; Anderhub, H.; Antoranz, P.; Armada, A.; Asensio, M.; Baixeras, C.; Barrio, J.A.; Bartelt, M.; Bartko, H.; et al. Observation of Gamma Rays from the Galactic Center with the MAGIC Telescope. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2006, 638, L101–L104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Holder, J.; Atkins, R.W.; Badran, H.M.; Blaylock, G.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Byrum, K.L.; Carter-Lewis, D.A.; Celik, O.; Chow, Y.C.K.; et al. The first VERITAS telescope. Astropart. Phys. 2006, 25, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Maier, G. Observation of the binary system LS I +61 303 in Very-High Energy Gamma-Rays with VERITAS. In Proceedings of the International Cosmic Ray Conference, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico, 3–11 July 2007; Volume 2, pp. 747–750. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maier, G.; Acciari, V.A.; Amini, R.; Blaylock, G.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Bugaev, V.; Butt, Y.; Byrum, K.L.; Celik, O.; et al. VERITAS: Status and Latest Results. In Proceedings of the International Cosmic Ray Conference, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico, 3–11 July 2007; Volume 3, pp. 1457–1460. [Google Scholar]
  21. Neronov, A.Y.; Semikoz, D.V. Which blazars are neutrino loud? Phys. Rev. D 2002, 66, 123003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. IceCube Collaboration; Aartsen, M.G.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Samarai, I.A.; Altmann, D.; Andeen, K.; et al. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert. Science 2018, 361, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ulrich, M.H.; Kinman, T.D.; Lynds, C.R.; Rieke, G.H.; Ekers, R.D. Nonthermal continuum radiation in three elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1975, 198, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wagner, R. Scientific Highlights from Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei with the MAGIC Telescope. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference, Heidelberg, Germany, 7–11 July 2008; Volume 1085, pp. 399–402. [Google Scholar]
  25. Markarian, B.E.; Lipovetskij, V.A. Galaxies with ultraviolet continuum. V. Astrofizika 1972, 8, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, H.R. B2 1101+38: A BL Lacertae object. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1975, 201, L109–L111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Punch, M.; Akerlof, C.W.; Cawley, M.F.; Chantell, M.; Fegan, D.J.; Fennell, S.; Gaidos, J.A.; Hagan, J.; Hillas, A.M.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Detection of TeV photons from the active galaxy Markarian 421. Nature 1992, 358, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Falomo, R.; Kotilainen, J.K.; Treves, A. The Black Hole Mass of BL Lacertae Objects from the Stellar Velocity Dispersion of the Host Galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2002, 569, L35–L38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, X.B.; Liu, F.K.; Zhang, T.Z. Supermassive black hole masses of AGNs with elliptical hosts. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 389, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Treves, A.; Carangelo, N.; Falomo, R.; Kotilainen, J. Mass of BL Lacs from the Velocity Dispersion of the Host Galaxy. ASPC 2003, 290, 621. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Z.; Gupta, A.C.; Gaur, H.; Wiita, P.J.; An, T.; Gu, M.; Hu, D.; Xu, H. X-Ray Intraday Variability of the TeV Blazar Mrk 421 with Suzaku. Astrophys. J. 2019, 884, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lin, Y.C.; Bertsch, D.L.; Chiang, J.; Fichtel, C.E.; Hartman, R.C.; Hunter, S.D.; Kanbach, G.; Kniffen, D.A.; Kwok, P.W.; Mattox, J.R.; et al. Detection of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from the BL Lacertae Object Markarian 421 by the EGRET Telescope on the Compton Observatory. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1992, 401, L61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Michelson, P.F.; Lin, Y.C.; Nolan, P.L.; Bertsch, D.L.; Fichtel, C.E.; Hartman, R.C.; Hunter, S.D.; Kwok, P.W.; Mattox, J.R.; Sreekumar, P.; et al. Markarian 421, PKS 0537-441, QSO 0716+714. IAUC 1992, 5470, 2. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schubnell, M.; Akerlof, C.W.; Cawley, M.F.; Chantell, M.; Fegan, D.J.; Fennell, S.; O’Flaherty, K.S.; Gaidos, J.A.; Hagan, J.; Hillas, A.M.; et al. Very High Energy Cosmic-Ray Interactions. In American Institute of Physics Conference Series; Jones, L., Ed.; AIP: College Park, MA, USA, 1993; Volume 276, pp. 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  35. Acciari, V.A.; Aliu, E.; Arlen, T.; Aune, T.; Beilicke, M.; Benbow, W.; Boltuch, D.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Bugaev, V.; et al. TeV and Multi-wavelength Observations of Mrk 421 in 2006–2008. Astrophys. J. 2011, 738, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Abeysekara, A.U.; Albert, A.; Alfaro, R.; Alvarez, C.; Álvarez, J.D.; Arceo, R.; Arteaga-Velázquez, J.C.; Avila Rojas, D.; Ayala Solares, H.A.; Barber, A.S.; et al. Daily Monitoring of TeV Gamma-Ray Emission from Mrk 421, Mrk 501, and the Crab Nebula with HAWC. Astrophys. J. 2017, 841, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maraschi, L.; Fossati, G.; Tavecchio, F.; Chiappetti, L.; Celotti, A.; Ghisellini, G.; Grandi, P.; Pian, E.; Tagliaferri, G.; Treves, A.; et al. Simultaneous X-Ray and TEV Observations of a Rapid Flare from Markarian 421. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1999, 526, L81–L84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Malizia, A.; Capalbi, M.; Fiore, F.; Giommi, P.; Gandolfi, G.; Tesseri, A.; Antonelli, L.A.; Butler, R.C.; Celidonio, G.; Coletta, A.; et al. The 0.1–100keV spectrum and variability of Mrk 421 in a high state. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000, 312, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fossati, G.; Celotti, A.; Chiaberge, M.; Zhang, Y.H.; Chiappetti, L.; Ghisellini, G.; Maraschi, L.; Tavecchio, F.; Pian, E.; Treves, A. X-Ray Emission of Markarian 421: New Clues from Its Spectral Evolution. I. Temporal Analysis. Astrophys. J. 2000, 541, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fossati, G.; Celotti, A.; Chiaberge, M.; Zhang, Y.H.; Chiappetti, L.; Ghisellini, G.; Maraschi, L.; Tavecchio, F.; Pian, E.; Treves, A. X-Ray Emission of Markarian 421: New Clues from Its Spectral Evolution. II. Spectral Analysis and Physical Constraints. Astrophys. J. 2000, 541, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Brinkmann, W.; Sembay, S.; Griffiths, R.G.; Branduardi-Raymont, G.; Gliozzi, M.; Boller, T.; Tiengo, A.; Molendi, S.; Zane, S. XMM-Newton observations of Markarian 421. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 365, L162–L167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sembay, S.; Edelson, R.; Markowitz, A.; Griffiths, R.G.; Turner, M.J.L. Complex X-Ray Spectral Variability in Markarian 421 Observed with XMM-Newton. Astrophys. J. 2002, 574, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brinkmann, W.; Papadakis, I.E.; den Herder, J.W.A.; Haberl, F. Temporal variability of Mrk 421 from XMM-Newton observations. Astron. Astrophys. 2003, 402, 929–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Brinkmann, W.; Papadakis, I.E.; Raeth, C.; Mimica, P.; Haberl, F. XMM-Newton timing mode observations of Mrk 421. Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 443, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ravasio, M.; Tagliaferri, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Tavecchio, F. Observing Mkn 421 with XMM-Newton: The EPIC-PN point of view. Astron. Astrophys. 2004, 424, 841–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Błażejowski, M.; Blaylock, G.; Bond, I.H.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Carter-Lewis, D.A.; Celik, O.; Cogan, P.; Cui, W.; Daniel, M.; et al. A Multiwavelength View of the TeV Blazar Markarian 421: Correlated Variability, Flaring, and Spectral Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2005, 630, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tramacere, A.; Massaro, F.; Cavaliere, A. Signatures of synchrotron emission and of electron acceleration in the X-ray spectra of Mrk 421. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 466, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fossati, G.; Buckley, J.H.; Bond, I.H.; Bradbury, S.M.; Carter-Lewis, D.A.; Chow, Y.C.K.; Cui, W.; Falcone, A.D.; Finley, J.P.; Gaidos, J.A.; et al. Multiwavelength Observations of Markarian 421 in 2001 March: An Unprecedented View on the X-Ray/TeV Correlated Variability. Astrophys. J. 2008, 677, 906–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lichti, G.G.; Bottacini, E.; Ajello, M.; Charlot, P.; Collmar, W.; Falcone, A.; Horan, D.; Huber, S.; von Kienlin, A.; Lähteenmäki, A.; et al. INTEGRAL observations of the blazar Mrk 421 in outburst. Results of a multi-wavelength campaign. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 486, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Donnarumma, I.; Vittorini, V.; Vercellone, S.; del Monte, E.; Feroci, M.; D’Ammando, F.; Pacciani, L.; Chen, A.W.; Tavani, M.; Bulgarelli, A.; et al. The June 2008 Flare of Markarian 421 from Optical to TeV Energies. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2009, 691, L13–L19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Horan, D.; Acciari, V.A.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Bugaev, V.; Byrum, K.L.; Cannon, A.; Celik, O.; Cesarini, A.; Chow, Y.C.K.; et al. Multiwavelength Observations of Markarian 421 in 2005-2006. Astrophys. J. 2009, 695, 596–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tramacere, A.; Giommi, P.; Perri, M.; Verrecchia, F.; Tosti, G. Swift observations of the very intense flaring activity of Mrk 421 during 2006. I. Phenomenological picture of electron acceleration and predictions for MeV/GeV emission. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 501, 879–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Isobe, N.; Sugimori, K.; Kawai, N.; Ueda, Y.; Negoro, H.; Sugizaki, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Daikyuji, A.; Eguchi, S.; Hiroi, K.; et al. Bright X-Ray Flares from the BL Lac Object Markarian 421, Detected with MAXI in 2010 January and February. PASJ 2010, 62, L55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pian, E.; Türler, M.; Fiocchi, M.; Boissay, R.; Bazzano, A.; Foschini, L.; Tavecchio, F.; Bianchin, V.; Castignani, G.; Ferrigno, C.; et al. An active state of the BL Lacertae object Markarian 421 detected by INTEGRAL in April 2013. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 570, A77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Aleksić, J.; Ansoldi, S.; Antonelli, L.A.; Antoranz, P.; Babic, A.; Bangale, P.; Barres de Almeida, U.; Barrio, J.A.; Becerra González, J.; Bednarek, W.; et al. The 2009 multiwavelength campaign on Mrk 421: Variability and correlation studies. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 576, A126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aleksić, J.; Ansoldi, S.; Antonelli, L.A.; Antoranz, P.; Babic, A.; Bangale, P.; Barres de Almeida, U.; Barrio, J.A.; Becerra González, J.; Bednarek, W.; et al. Unprecedented study of the broadband emission of Mrk 421 during flaring activity in March 2010. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 578, A22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pandey, A.; Gupta, A.C.; Wiita, P.J. X-Ray Intraday Variability of Five TeV Blazars with NuSTAR. Astrophys. J. 2017, 841, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kataoka, J.; Stawarz, Ł. Inverse Compton X-Ray Emission from TeV Blazar Mrk 421 During a Historical Low-flux State Observed with NuSTAR. Astrophys. J. 2016, 827, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Acciari, V.A.; Ansoldi, S.; Antonelli, L.A.; Arbet Engels, A.; Baack, D.; Babić, A.; Banerjee, B.; Barres de Almeida, U.; Barrio, J.A.; Becerra González, J.; et al. Unraveling the Complex Behavior of Mrk 421 with Simultaneous X-Ray and VHE Observations during an Extreme Flaring Activity in 2013 April. ApJS 2020, 248, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aggrawal, V.; Pandey, A.; Gupta, A.C.; Zhang, Z.; Wiita, P.J.; Yadav, K.K.; Tiwari, S.N. X-ray intraday variability of the TeV blazar Mrk 421 with Chandra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 480, 4873–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zhu, S.; Fan, J. Systematic Investigation of X-Ray Spectral Variability of TeV Blazars during Flares in the RXTE Era. Astrophys. J. 2018, 867, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kataoka, J.; Takahashi, T.; Wagner, S.J.; Iyomoto, N.; Edwards, P.G.; Hayashida, K.; Inoue, S.; Madejski, G.M.; Takahara, F.; Tanihata, C.; et al. Characteristic X-Ray Variability of TeV Blazars: Probing the Link between the Jet and the Central Engine. Astrophys. J. 2001, 560, 659–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Isobe, N.; Sato, R.; Ueda, Y.; Hayashida, M.; Shidatsu, M.; Kawamuro, T.; Ueno, S.; Sugizaki, M.; Sugimoto, J.; Mihara, T.; et al. MAXI Investigation into the Long-term X-Ray Variability from the Very-high-energy γ-Ray Blazar Mrk 421. Astrophys. J. 2015, 798, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Abeysekara, A.U.; Archambault, S.; Archer, A.; Benbow, W.; Bird, R.; Buchovecky, M.; Buckley, J.H.; Bugaev, V.; Cardenzana, J.V.; Cerruti, M.; et al. A Search for Spectral Hysteresis and Energy-dependent Time Lags from X-Ray and TeV Gamma-Ray Observations of Mrk 421. Astrophys. J. 2017, 834, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Goyal, A. Blazar variability power spectra from radio up to TeV photon energies: Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 494, 3432–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Krawczynski, H.; Sambruna, R.; Kohnle, A.; Coppi, P.S.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Barrio, J.; Bernlöhr, K.; Börst, H.; Bojahr, H.; et al. Simultaneous X-Ray and TeV Gamma-Ray Observation of the TeV Blazar Markarian 421 during 2000 February and May. Astrophys. J. 2001, 559, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Massaro, E.; Perri, M.; Giommi, P.; Nesci, R. Log-parabolic spectra and particle acceleration in the BL Lac object Mkn 421: Spectral analysis of the complete BeppoSAX wide band X-ray data set. Astron. Astrophys. 2004, 413, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Massaro, F.; Tramacere, A.; Cavaliere, A.; Perri, M.; Giommi, P. X-ray spectral evolution of TeV BL Lacertae objects: Eleven years of observations with BeppoSAX, XMM-Newton and Swift satellites. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 478, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Rebillot, P.F.; Badran, H.M.; Blaylock, G.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Carter-Lewis, D.A.; Celik, O.; Chow, Y.C.; Cogan, P.; Cui, W.; et al. Multiwavelength Observations of the Blazar Markarian 421 in 2002 December and 2003 January. Astrophys. J. 2006, 641, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Giebels, B.; Dubus, G.; Khélifi, B. Unveiling the X-ray/TeV engine in Mkn 421. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 462, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Böttcher, M.; Chiang, J. X-Ray Spectral Variability Signatures of Flares in BL Lacertae Objects. Astrophys. J. 2002, 581, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Acciari, V.A.; Aliu, E.; Aune, T.; Beilicke, M.; Benbow, W.; Böttcher, M.; Bradbury, S.M.; Buckley, J.H.; Bugaev, V.; Butt, Y.; et al. Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations of Markarian 421 During Outburst. Astrophys. J. 2009, 703, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Ajello, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Barbiellini, G.; Bastieri, D.; Bechtol, K.; Bellazzini, R.; Berenji, B.; et al. Fermi Large Area Telescope Observations of Markarian 421: The Missing Piece of its Spectral Energy Distribution. Astrophys. J. 2011, 736, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Aleksić, J.; Alvarez, E.A.; Antonelli, L.A.; Antoranz, P.; Asensio, M.; Backes, M.; Barrio, J.A.; Bastieri, D.; Becerra González, J.; Bednarek, W.; et al. Mrk 421 active state in 2008: The MAGIC view, simultaneous multi-wavelength observations and SSC model constrained. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 542, A100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Yan, D.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, Q.; Fan, Z.; Zeng, H. Emitting Electrons Spectra and Acceleration Processes in the Jet of Mrk 421: From the Low State to the Giant Flare State. Astrophys. J. 2013, 765, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Mastichiadis, A.; Petropoulou, M.; Dimitrakoudis, S. Mrk 421 as a case study for TeV and X-ray variability in leptohadronic models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 434, 2684–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Sinha, A.; Shukla, A.; Misra, R.; Chitnis, V.R.; Rao, A.R.; Acharya, B.S. Underlying particle spectrum of Mkn 421 during the huge X-ray flare in April 2013. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 580, A100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Baloković, M.; Paneque, D.; Madejski, G.; Furniss, A.; Chiang, J.; Ajello, M.; Alexander, D.M.; Barret, D.; Blandford, R.D.; Boggs, S.E.; et al. Multiwavelength Study of Quiescent States of Mrk 421 with Unprecedented Hard X-Ray Coverage Provided by NuSTAR in 2013. Astrophys. J. 2016, 819, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Schwartz, D.A.; Doxsey, R.E.; Griffiths, R.E.; Johnston, M.D.; Schwarz, J. X-ray emitting BL Lacertae objects located by the scanning modulation collimator experiment on HEAO 1. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1979, 229, L53–L57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Griffiths, R.E.; Tapia, S.; Briel, U.; Chaisson, L. Optical and X-ray properties of the newly discovered BL Lac object PKS 2155-304 (=H 2155-304). Astrophys. J. 1979, 234, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hewitt, A.; Burbidge, G. A revised optical catalogue of quasi-stellar objects. ApJS 1980, 43, 57–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Falomo, R.; Pesce, J.E.; Treves, A. The Environment of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1993, 411, L63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vestrand, W.T.; Stacy, J.G.; Sreekumar, P. High-Energy Gamma Rays from the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1995, 454, L93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chadwick, P.M.; Lyons, K.; McComb, T.J.L.; Orford, K.J.; Osborne, J.L.; Rayner, S.M.; Shaw, S.E.; Turver, K.E.; Wieczorek, G.J. Very High Energy Gamma Rays from PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 1999, 513, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Treves, A.; Morini, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Fabian, A.; Falomo, R.; Maccagni, D.; Maraschi, L.; Tanzi, E.G.; Tagliaferri, G. Simultaneous X-Ray, Ultraviolet, and Optical Observations of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 1989, 341, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sembay, S.; Warwick, R.S.; Urry, C.M.; Sokoloski, J.; George, I.M.; Makino, F.; Ohashi, T.; Tashiro, M. The X-Ray Spectral Variability of the BL Lacertae Type Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 1993, 404, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brinkmann, W.; Maraschi, L.; Treves, A.; Urry, C.M.; Warwick, R.; Siebert, J.; Wagner, S.; Edelson, R.; Fink, H.; Madejski, G. Multi-wavelength monitoring of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304 II. The ROSAT Observations. Astron. Astrophys. 1994, 288, 433–447. [Google Scholar]
  88. Edelson, R.; Krolik, J.; Madejski, G.; Maraschi, L.; Pike, G.; Urry, C.M.; Brinkmann, W.; Courvoisier, T.J.L.; Ellithorpe, J.; Horne, K.; et al. Multiwavelength Monitoring of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. IV. Multiwavelength Analysis. Astrophys. J. 1995, 438, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Urry, C.M.; Treves, A.; Maraschi, L.; Marshall, H.L.; Kii, T.; Madejski, G.; Penton, S.; Pesce, J.E.; Pian, E.; Celotti, A.; et al. Multiwavelength Monitoring of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304 in 1994 May. III. Probing the Inner Jet through Multiwavelength Correlations. Astrophys. J. 1997, 486, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Giommi, P.; Fiore, F.; Guainazzi, M.; Feroci, M.; Frontera, F.; Ghisellini, G.; Grandi, P.; Maraschi, L.; Mineo, T.; Molendi, S.; et al. The complex 0.1-100 keV X-ray spectrum of PKS 2155-304. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 333, L5–L8. [Google Scholar]
  91. Chiappetti, L.; Torroni, V. PKS 2155-304. IAUC 1997, 6776, 2. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chiappetti, L.; Maraschi, L.; Tavecchio, F.; Celotti, A.; Fossati, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Giommi, P.; Pian, E.; Tagliaferri, G.; Treves, A.; et al. Spectral Evolution of PKS 2155-304 Observed with BeppoSAX during an Active Gamma-Ray Phase. Astrophys. J. 1999, 521, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, Y.H.; Celotti, A.; Treves, A.; Chiappetti, L.; Ghisellini, G.; Maraschi, L.; Pian, E.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tavecchio, F.; Urry, C.M. Rapid X-Ray Variability of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 1999, 527, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zhang, Y.H.; Treves, A.; Celotti, A.; Chiappetti, L.; Fossati, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Maraschi, L.; Pian, E.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tavecchio, F. Four Years of Monitoring Blazar PKS 2155-304 with BeppoSAX: Probing the Dynamics of the Jet. Astrophys. J. 2002, 572, 762–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, Y.H.; Treves, A.; Celotti, A.; Qin, Y.P.; Bai, J.M. XMM-Newton View of PKS 2155-304: Characterizing the X-Ray Variability Properties with EPIC pn. Astrophys. J. 2005, 629, 686–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Zhang, Y.H.; Treves, A.; Maraschi, L.; Bai, J.M.; Liu, F.K. XMM-Newton View of PKS 2155-304: Hardness Ratio and Cross-Correlation Analysis of EPIC pn Observations. Astrophys. J. 2006, 637, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhang, Y.H.; Bai, J.M.; Zhang, S.N.; Treves, A.; Maraschi, L.; Celotti, A. Multiwavelength Observations of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304 with XMM-Newton. Astrophys. J. 2006, 651, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Bhagwan, J.; Gupta, A.C.; Papadakis, I.E.; Wiita, P.J. Spectral energy distributions of the BL Lac PKS 2155 - 304 from XMM-Newton. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 444, 3647–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bhagwan, J.; Gupta, A.C.; Papadakis, I.E.; Wiita, P.J. Flux and spectral variability of the blazar PKS 2155 -304 with XMM-Newton: Evidence of particle acceleration and synchrotron cooling. New A 2016, 44, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zhang, Y.H. XMM-Newton Observations of the TeV BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304 in 2006: Signature of Inverse Compton X-Ray Emission? Astrophys. J. 2008, 682, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Kataoka, J.; Takahashi, T.; Makino, F.; Inoue, S.; Madejski, G.M.; Tashiro, M.; Urry, C.M.; Kubo, H. Variability Pattern and the Spectral Evolution of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 2000, 528, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Foschini, L.; Ghisellini, G.; Tavecchio, F.; Treves, A.; Maraschi, L.; Gliozzi, M.; Raiteri, C.M.; Villata, M.; Pian, E.; Tagliaferri, G.; et al. X-Ray/UV/Optical Follow-up of the Blazar PKS 2155-304 after the Giant TeV Flares of 2006 July. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2007, 657, L81–L84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.G.; Anton, G.; Barres de Almeida, U.; Bazer-Bachi, A.R.; Becherini, Y.; Behera, B.; Bernlöhr, K.; Boisson, C.; Bochow, A.; et al. Simultaneous Observations of PKS 2155-304 with HESS, Fermi, RXTE, and Atom: Spectral Energy Distributions and Variability in a Low State. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2009, 696, L150–L155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. H.E.S.S. Collaboration; Abramowski, A.; Acero, F.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.G.; Anton, G.; Balzer, A.; Barnacka, A.; Barres de Almeida, U.; Becherini, Y.; et al. A multiwavelength view of the flaring state of PKS 2155-304 in 2006. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 539, A149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gaur, H.; Chen, L.; Misra, R.; Sahayanathan, S.; Gu, M.F.; Kushwaha, P.; Dewangan, G.C. The Hard X-Ray Emission of the Blazar PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. 2017, 850, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tagliaferri, G.; Stella, L.; Maraschi, L.; Treves, A.; Celotti, A. Short-Term X-Ray Variability of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304: Power Spectrum and Cross-Correlation Analysis. Astrophys. J. 1991, 380, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lachowicz, P.; Gupta, A.C.; Gaur, H.; Wiita, P.J. A ~4.6 h quasi-periodic oscillation in the BL Lacertae PKS 2155-304? Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 506, L17–L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Gaur, H.; Gupta, A.C.; Lachowicz, P.; Wiita, P.J. Detection of Intra-day Variability Timescales of Four High-energy Peaked Blazars with XMM-Newton. Astrophys. J. 2010, 718, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. González-Martín, O.; Vaughan, S. X-ray variability of 104 active galactic nuclei. XMM-Newton power-spectrum density profiles. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 544, A80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Gupta, A.C. Quasi Periodic Oscillations in Blazars. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2014, 35, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gupta, A. Multi-Wavelength Intra-Day Variability and Quasi-Periodic Oscillation in Blazars. Galaxies 2018, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Urry, C.M.; Maraschi, L.; Edelson, R.; Koratkar, A.; Krolik, J.; Madejski, G.; Pian, E.; Pike, G.; Reichert, G.; Treves, A.; et al. Multiwavelength Monitoring of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. I. The IUE Campaign. Astrophys. J. 1993, 411, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fan, J.H.; Lin, R.G. The variability analysis of PKS 2155-304. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 355, 880–884. [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhang, B.K.; Zhao, X.Y.; Wang, C.X.; Dai, B.Z. Optical quasi-periodic oscillation and color behavior of blazar PKS 2155-304. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 14, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Sandrinelli, A.; Covino, S.; Treves, A. Quasi-periodicities of the BL Lacertae Object PKS 2155-304. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2014, 793, L1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sandrinelli, A.; Covino, S.; Dotti, M.; Treves, A. Quasi-periodicities at Year-like Timescales in Blazars. Astron. J. 2016, 151, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, P.F.; Yan, D.H.; Liao, N.H.; Wang, J.C. Revisiting Quasi-periodic Modulation in γ-Ray Blazar PKS 2155-304 with Fermi Pass 8 Data. Astrophys. J. 2017, 835, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Pekeur, N.W.; Taylor, A.R.; Potter, S.B.; Kraan-Korteweg, R.C. Evidence for quasi-periodic oscillations in the optical polarization of the blazar PKS 2155-304. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 462, L80–L83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
1
2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gupta, A.C. X-ray Flux and Spectral Variability of the TeV Blazars Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304. Galaxies 2020, 8, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8030064

AMA Style

Gupta AC. X-ray Flux and Spectral Variability of the TeV Blazars Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304. Galaxies. 2020; 8(3):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8030064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gupta, Alok C. 2020. "X-ray Flux and Spectral Variability of the TeV Blazars Mrk 421 and PKS 2155-304" Galaxies 8, no. 3: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8030064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop