Next Article in Journal
Factorial Validity of the Pediatric Nurse Parent Partnership Scale—Pediatric Nurses (PNPPS-PN)
Previous Article in Journal
Drug Use among the Elderly Assisted by the Psychosocial Assistance Center in District Federal-Brasilia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/healthcare10060990
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Active Commuting to University Is Positively Associated with Physical Activity and Perceived Fitness

by
Ximena Palma-Leal
1,2,
Maribel Parra-Saldías
3,
Salomé Aubert
4 and
Palma Chillón
1,*
1
PROFITH “PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity” Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
2
IRyS Group, School of Physical Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar 2340000, Chile
3
Departamento de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó 1532297, Chile
4
Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 990; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10060990
Submission received: 23 March 2022 / Revised: 26 April 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Fitness is a powerful marker of health associated with physical activity (PA) in university students. However, insufficient PA is a serious health concern among university students. Active commuting provides an opportunity for increased PA levels. Therefore, the aims of this study were (a) to describe the mode of commuting, PA and fitness in university students; (b) to analyze the associations of mode of commuting with PA and fitness; and c) to analyze the relationship between mode of commuting, PA recommendations and fitness. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 1257 university students (52.4% women) participated (22.4 ± 5.6 years old). Results: Public commuting was the main mode to and from university. Active and public commuters were more likely to meet the PA recommendations and reported higher muscular strength than those using private commuting. Active and public commuters who met PA recommendations present the highest fitness in most of its components. Conclusions: Achieving the PA recommendations was more relevant than adopting an active mode of commuting in order to have better fitness. Further research targeting a broader understanding of the mode of commuting, PA levels and fitness in university students is needed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There is irrefutable evidence that physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of premature mortality and is an effective primary and secondary preventive strategy for at least 25 chronic medical conditions [1]. The PA recommendations for adults developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that adults should engage in a combination of 75–150 min of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA) throughout the week to obtain substantial health benefits [2]. However, the majority of adults worldwide do not meet the recommended amount of PA, and this trend appears to continue over time [3].
An insufficient level of PA is a serious health concern among university students. This specific population was described as emerging adults [4,5] who are simultaneously in positions of vulnerability and influence as they enter a new stage in life that includes more responsibility while being exposed to increased opportunities for personal growth [6]. Similar to adults, the unfavorable patterns of PA are evident in university students [7]. In Canada, more than one-half of the university students were estimated to not meet sufficient levels of PA [8]. In Spain, only 5.4% of university students were estimated to meet the recommendation of MVPA [9]. In the United States, fewer than 10% of university students were estimated to meet 30 min of MVPA 5 days a week [10], and in Chile, every year, there is an observed decrease in the levels of PA in university students [11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to invest directly in strategies to promote PA among university students.
The main health message directed to all populations is that doing some PA is better than doing none [2,12]. Active commuting (AC), such as walking or cycling, provides an opportunity for increased PA levels in university students by increasing energy expenditure per minute [13]. In addition, a systematic review demonstrated that children and adolescents who walk or cycle to school can accumulate between 5 and 37 additional minutes of PA per day compared to those using passive modes of commuting [14]. However, students starting university tend to decrease their AC compared to when they were in secondary education [15,16].
AC can play an important role in addressing the issue of insufficient level of PA in university students. Indeed, in Latin American countries, such as Chile, associations with AC could be important and useful for public health, by the fact that recommending this active behavior in daily routines could be an important contributor to PA levels, which would be reflected in health benefits in the university population, known to be an inactive population with unhealthy habits. In addition, increased PA levels have been associated with greater fitness in university students [17]. Fitness is a powerful marker of health [18] that has been previously studied among university students. Studies showed that students from Qatar with greater fitness had lower morbidity and mortality [19], while students from Colombia had a healthy blood pressure levels, fat-free mass index and triglyceride levels and a lower prevalence of obesity indicators, even if it was self-reported fitness [20]. Therefore, associations between AC and PA, as well as fitness, may be of high interest in detecting the physical health benefits that active modes of commuting may contribute in this population and future programs to be implemented at universities, especially in Latin American countries, which are difficult to compare with developed countries, such as the Netherlands or Germany, where the use of active commuting is a common part of the university routines. Therefore, the aims of the current study were (a) to describe the mode of commuting, PA and fitness in university students by sex; (b) to analyze the associations of mode of commuting with PA and fitness by sex; and (c) to analyze the relationship between mode of commuting, MVPA recommendations and fitness by sex.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted between April and November of 2017 during normal class periods. A total of 1257 university students (52.4% women) with an average age of 22.4 ± 5.6 years participated in this study. The participants were recruited from three different public and private universities (public: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso and Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María; private: Universidad de las Américas) located in urban cities in the central zone of Chile (two in Valparaíso and one in Santiago). The students belonged to diverse faculties (art, engineering, health, social sciences and education), and their length of study ranged from one to ten semesters. The sampling was via convenience. The students all agreed to participate voluntarily in the study, recruited from special courses of “healthy life” or “recreational program of physical activity”. Those students enrolled between 2010 and 2015, as well as those belonging to the career of physical education or athletes involved in the university leagues, were excluded.

2.2. Procedures and Ethical Requirements

A letter with the objectives of the study was sent to the corresponding authorities of the selected universities that were chosen by convenience because there were local teachers interested in this research. Once the universities’ authorizations were obtained, all university students attending the above courses were invited to voluntarily participate in the present study by means of a face-to-face presentation where they received detailed information about the objectives and methods of the study. Those who agreed to participate in the study completed a letter of informed consent in which the characteristics of the questionnaire, the purpose of the study and the confidentiality of the results were explained again. Students completed a 15 to 30 min self-reported paper-based questionnaire that was distributed and guided by the previously trained volunteer local teacher researchers. All procedures followed the Helsinki protocols [21] and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Code: CCF02052017).

2.3. Instruments

The self-reported questionnaire used for this study was created at the School of Physical Education by researchers with expertise on the topic of AC and was called “Questionnaire of mode of commuting and PA to the university”. It was created based on a literature review and consultations with experts. This questionnaire includes questions about sociodemographic variables and commuting behaviors. Every question was adapted to university students’ context and was found reliable for Chilean university students [22].

2.4. Mode of Commuting

The question about the mode of commuting was selected based on a systematic review of 158 peer-reviewed publications as the most appropriate measurement for assessing the mode of commuting by self-reported questionnaire [23]. This specific question was found to have an appropriate validity [24] and reliability [25] in young Spanish people and was found reliable for university students [22]. The mode of commuting to and from university was assessed using separate questions: How do you usually travel to university? How do you usually travel from university? The answer options were walking, cycling, car, motorcycle, public bus, metro/train and others. Participants were classified into three categories: “active” (walking and cycling), “private” (car and motorcycle) and “public” (public bus and metro/train) commuting [26]. Students with combined answers (e.g., active + private) were classified in the mode of commuting involving the highest PA levels. AC involves the highest PA levels, followed by public commuting which involves an intermediate level of PA in walking to and from stations and stops; private commuting is assumed to involve the lowest PA levels [27].

2.5. PA and Sedentary Behavior

PA was evaluated using the seven questions of the International PA Questionnaire (IPAQ) short version [28]. The IPAQ assesses three types of PA (light, moderate and vigorous) and sedentary behavior. The final output provides the sum of the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of light, moderate, vigorous and total PA and sedentary behavior. Participants’ PA level was calculated and categorized using metabolic equivalents (METs): light PA level corresponded to 3.3 METs × minutes × days per week; moderate PA level to 4 METs × moderate minutes × days per week; and vigorous PA level to 8 METs × minutes × days per week. Total PA corresponded to the sum of light, moderate and vigorous PA. Participants were also classified according to the MVPA recommendations for adults (≥150 min/week) as meeting MVPA recommendations or not meeting MVPA recommendations [12]. In addition, sedentary behavior was expressed in hours per day (h/day).

2.6. Fitness

The perceived fitness was self-reported using the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) based on the answers to six basic questions about fitness: general physical condition, cardio-respiratory fitness, muscular strength, speed and agility, flexibility and general health [29]. The possible Likert-scale answers, on a five-point scale, were “very poor” (1), “poor” (2), “average” (3), “good” (4) and “very good” (5) [29]. The mean of each fitness component was calculated and used for the analysis.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were reported for participants’ mode of commuting, PA and fitness, separated by gender (men or women). Means and standard deviation (SD) were reported for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages (%) were reported for categorical variables. The significant differences in these descriptive variables for men and women were analyzed using chi-square test for categorical variables and standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables, where the level of significance was set to p < 0.05. Associations between mode of commuting and PA, as well as fitness, were studied using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Mode of commuting was included in the model as the dependent variable, where private commuting was established as a reference, and PA and fitness were included as independent variables in separate models. We conducted these analyses separately for men and women. A complementary analysis was repeated conducting the same multinomial logistic regression but adjusting for fitness and PA in order to take into account the potential interaction between PA and fitness. In addition, another complementary analysis was carried out to identify the associations between PA recommendations and fitness by gender. PA recommendations were included in the model as the dependent variable, where not meeting MVPA recommendations was established as a reference, and fitness was included as an independent variable. All logistic regression analyses were separated by gender. An additional analysis was conducted to examine the effect of both mode of commuting and PA on fitness. For this analysis, six categorical groups based on the three modes of commuting (active, public and private) and the PA (meeting or not meeting MVPA recommendations) were calculated (e.g., active–meeting MVPA, public–meeting MVPA, private–meeting MVPA, active–not meeting MVPA, public–not meeting MVPA and private–meeting MVPA). All of the six fitness questions (general physical condition, cardio-respiratory fitness, muscular strength, speed and agility, flexibility and general health) were included as independent variables in a one-way analysis of variance ANOVA, and a post hoc subcommand Bonferroni test was used to compare the means of the categorical groups created between the three modes of commuting and PA (meeting or not meeting MVPA recommendations). This analysis was adjusted by gender. The statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 25.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

Mode of commuting, PA, sedentary behavior and fitness of the participants, as well as the significant differences by gender, are presented in Table 1. The main mode of commuting to and from university was public modes in men (55.5%) and women (69.7%), followed by active modes (men: 34.4% (walking = 32.6%, cycling = 1.8%); women: 19.0% (walking = 17.5%, cycling = 1.5%)) and private modes (men: 10.0%; women: 11.4%) (p < 0.001). Regarding PA levels, most men showed a vigorous PA level (43.3%), while most women showed a light PA level (49.6%) (p < 0.001). In addition, 54.5% of men and 41.4% of women (p < 0.001) reported meeting the MVPA recommendations. The mean total PA time was 1.9 ± 1.8 h/day in men and 1.2 ± 1.4 h/day in women (p < 0.001). In contrast, the mean sedentary behavior time was 6.8 ± 6.9 h/day in men and 6.2 ± 5.9 in women (p < 0.001). There were significant differences among all fitness components (p < 0.001), where women presented lower mean scores, except for flexibility.
The associations of mode of commuting with PA levels, sedentary behavior, and fitness are presented separately for gender in Table 2. Active commuters had higher moderate (men: p = 0.021) and vigorous PA levels (women: p = 0.022) than private commuters. In addition, active commuters met the MVPA recommendations (men: p = 0.042; women: p = 0.028) and had higher total PA (women: p = 0.036) than private commuters. On the other hand, active and public commuters reported engaging in less sedentary behavior (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively) than those who used a private mode of commuting. Regarding fitness, male active and public commuters showed higher muscular strength (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively) compared to those who used a private mode of commuting. Finally, public commuters reported higher flexibility and general health levels (women: p = 0.030; men: p = 0.040, respectively) compared to students who used private modes of commuting.
The same analysis was repeated adjusting by PA recommendations and fitness (except in the analysis where that variable was the predictor variable), and similar results were obtained. Male public commuters had higher moderate and vigorous PA levels and met the MVPA recommendations more than private commuters. Concerning fitness, female active commuters showed higher muscular strength and flexibility compared to those who used a private mode of commuting (Supplementary Material Table S1). Regarding the association between PA and fitness, men and women who met the MVPA recommendations had higher fitness (all p < 0.001) than those who did not meet the MVPA recommendations (Supplementary Material Table S2).
The associations of the mode of commuting and meeting MVPA recommendations with fitness in male and female students are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. According to these analyses, active, public and private commuters, both men and women, who met MVPA recommendations reported higher general physical condition compared to active, public and private commuters who did not meet MVPA recommendations. In addition, male active and public commuters who met MVPA recommendations reported higher cardio-respiratory fitness, muscular strength, speed and agility and general health compared to students who use active and public commuting and did not meet MVPA recommendations. Finally, public commuters who met MVPA recommendations reported higher flexibility compared to those that use a public mode of commuting and did not meet MVPA recommendations. Additionally, women who use public and private modes of commuting and met MVPA recommendations reported higher cardio-respiratory fitness compared to those who use public and private modes of commuting and did not meet MVPA recommendations. Finally, public commuters who met MVPA recommendations reported higher muscular strength, speed and agility, flexibility and general health compared to those that use public commuting and did not meet MVPA recommendations.

4. Discussion

The main findings in the present study were that (a) the public mode of commuting was the most used and that men reported higher PA and fitness than women, (b) active and public commuters were more likely to meet the MVPA recommendations and reported higher muscular strength than those using private commuting and (c) active and public commuters who met MVPA recommendations present the highest fitness in most of its components.
Public commuting was the main mode of commuting to and from university for men and women. This mode of commuting may be beneficial for university students, as several studies have found. One study investigated an adult working population (over 18 years old) for 10 years and indicated that using public transportation services generally involves some walking (e.g., to bus stops or train stations) and could be an important contribution to energy expenditure [27]. In fact, a study in an English adult population (aged < 35 years old) showed that the public mode of commuting to and from work has an important contribution to PA levels, with 25.7 ± 14 min more per week of MVPA than private commuters [30]. Consequently, a key contribution of this research is the identification of differences in health and social implications between public and private modes of commuting. However, most of the studies to date identify both modes in the same category as passive modes [31]. In the present study, women had a lighter PA level, while men had a more vigorous PA level. In fact, a lower percentage of women reported that they were meeting MVPA recommendations compared with men. This finding is in agreement with studies in Spain and Colombia reporting that university women showed lower levels of PA compared with male students [32,33]. Similar results were already observed in Chile in 2013 among university students [34]. Therefore, it is necessary to implement programs promoting PA targeting specifically university women. Furthermore, in the current study, men showed higher mean scores in all perceived fitness components, except for flexibility, compared with female students. In line with our findings, similar results were obtained in a Slovenian study, with objective measures, where female university students presented better flexibility than men [17]. In this sense, a possible explanation for this might be that there are different stereotypes preconceived by society, such as that coordination in dance and/or higher flexibility has been associated mostly with women. Therefore, independent of the evaluation by a self-reported questionnaire, female participants may consider their flexibility as a high point of their fitness. Nevertheless, the rate of decline in flexibility with age was found to vary depending on the PA levels [35]. Therefore, if university women maintain their low PA levels throughout their adulthood, it is anticipated that their good flexibility scores could potentially decrease rapidly, and such stereotypes should come to an end.
Active commuters were more likely to reach higher moderate and vigorous PA levels (men and women, respectively) and meet the MVPA recommendations (both men and women) compared with those who used private commuting modes. These results are consistent with data obtained in adults, with positive associations between AC to work and PA [36,37], and a young population, where children and adolescents who use AC to school were significantly more physically active and were more likely to meet the MVPA recommendations than those who use private commuting [38], which reinforces the idea that AC may be a possible way to promote PA in the university population, as in any other population. Concerning fitness, a systematic review indicated that in the adult population, AC presents an important and positive association with fitness (cardio-respiratory fitness and muscular strength) [31]. In the present study, male active and public commuters showed higher muscular strength compared to those who used private modes of commuting. Similar results were reported in Norwegian children and adolescents (9 to 15 years) [39] and Finnish male young adults (25.5 ± 5.0 years) [40], where AC was positively associated with muscular strength. However, studies in adolescents and adults indicated that participants who use the cycling commuting present higher muscular strength, a benefit that appears to be greater than that achieved by walking commuters, because it will depend on the intensity [41,42,43]. In addition, female and male public commuters reported higher flexibility and general health levels, respectively, compared to students to those who used private modes of commuting. The lack of studies related to this topic in university students makes a comparison with the results of the present study difficult. Further research concerning the modes of commuting to university and fitness is necessary.
Finally, we analyzed the full relationship between PA behaviors (e.g., mode of commuting and MVPA recommendations) and fitness. Overall, low perceived fitness is reported among university students who do not meet MVPA recommendations, regardless of the mode of commuting. In fact, male and female public commuters who met MVPA recommendations present higher fitness in all cases (e.g., general physical condition, cardio-respiratory fitness, muscular strength, speed and agility, flexibility and general health); likewise, male active commuters who met MVPA recommendations present higher fitness (except in flexibility) compared to those not meeting the MVPA recommendations. Although the literature indicates that AC has the potential to generate the recommended weekly volume of PA [44], and PA has been associated with fitness in university students [17], according to our results, meeting MVPA recommendations was more associated with higher perceived fitness than the mode of commuting chosen among university students. Consequently, achieving the PA recommendations is more relevant than adopting an active mode of commuting in order to have better fitness, and it seems that students do not consider that AC could be a way to come closer to complying with these recommendations, as they see it as lighter behavior. In fact, despite the information available in the literature, AC could be undervalued and considered as light PA, but it should be considered as a potential behavior with relevant contributions to the physical health status and other associated benefits.
These findings provide evidence that a more physically active profile and a greater self-perception of fitness could be observed among more active commuters among university students. This indicated that new policies and public health actions could be developed to strategically target the increase in PA levels through the promotion of AC to and from university. However, further studies are required for a deeper examination of the relationships between PA levels, fitness and AC in university students, particularly studies using device-based measurement of PA and examining the contribution of AC modes to the PA recommendation. These findings could be applied in future programs to promote PA in the Chilean university population by encouraging the use of active commuting and assessing fitness and its implication on health.

Limitations and Strengths

This study presented several limitations. The number of participants included was not representative of the entire Chilean university student population. In addition, the use of questionnaires to assess the mode of commuting, PA levels and fitness could be associated with recall bias and social desirability, and the use of device-measured physical activity (such as accelerometers) could have clarified the results of this study. On the other hand, a main strength of this study is the differentiation between public and private modes of commuting in our analysis, considering that most of the studies combine both modes as a unique mode called “passive”. In addition, it is important to highlight that to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing the relationship between the mode of commuting, the PA levels and the perceived fitness in Chilean university students, which represent an understudied population in the field of PA and health.

5. Conclusions

This study presents needed new evidence for the university student population regarding mode of commuting, PA and fitness. Public commuting was the main mode of commuting to and from university. Furthermore, active commuters were more likely to meet the MVPA recommendations and reported higher muscular fitness. In addition, low perceived fitness was reported among the university students who did not meet MVPA recommendations, regardless of the mode of commuting. Overall, the results highlighted the need for the development of actions or policies promoting PA specifically targeting university students. Further research targeting a broader understanding of the mode of commuting, PA levels and fitness in university students is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare10060990/s1, Table S1: Associations of mode of commuting with physical activity, sedentarism and fitness of participants by gender; Table S2: Associations between PA recommendations and fitness by gender.

Author Contributions

X.P.-L. had full access to all the data in the study, took responsibility for the data analysis and drafted the manuscript; P.C. conceived and designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation of results and carried out critical revisions of the manuscript. S.A. carried out critical revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content. M.P.-S. contributed to data collection and participated in the revisions of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study has been funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)/Regional Ministry of Economic Transformation, Industry, Knowledge and Universities of Andalusia/Project CiudActiva B-CTS-160-UGR20, and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund (DEP2016-75598-R, MINECO/FEDER, UE) for P.C. and X.P-L. Further, this research was funded by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2020—[Grant N° 72210020] for X.P.-L. Additionally, it was supported by the University of Granada Plan Propio de Investigación 2021—Excellence actions: Unity of Excellence on Exercise, Nutrition and Health (UCEENS) for P.C.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Code: CCF02052017, January 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available on paper in the laboratory of the IRYS research group at the School of Physical Education in Viña del Mar, Valparaíso, Chile.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the students who participated in this study and the institutions for making this research possible and for their collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Warburton, D.E.R.; Bredin, S.S.D. Health benefits of physical activity: A systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2017, 32, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. WHO. Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336656 (accessed on 7 January 2021).
  3. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Arnett, J.J. College Students as Emerging Adults: The Developmental Implications of the College Context. Emerg. Adulthood 2016, 4, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balgiu, B.A. Self-esteem, personality and resilience. Study of a students emerging adults group. J. Educ. Sci. Psychol. 2017, 7, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ori, E.M.; Berry, T.R. Physical activity information seeking among emerging adults attending university. J. Am. Coll. Health 2020, 70, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peterson, N.E.; Sirard, J.R.; Kulbok, P.A.; DeBoer, M.D.; Erickson, J.M. Sedentary behavior and physical activity of young adult university students. Res. Nurs. Health 2018, 41, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Irwin, J.D. Prevalence of university students’ sufficient physical activity: A systematic review. Percept. Mot. Skills 2004, 98, 927–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arias-Palencia, N.M.; Solera-Martínez, M.; Gracia-Marco, L.; Silva, P.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.; Cañete-García-Prieto, J.; Sánchez-López, M. Levels and Patterns of Objectively Assessed Physical Activity and Compliance with Different Public Health Guidelines in University Students. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Small, M.; Bailey-Davis, L.; Morgan, N.; Maggs, J. Changes in eating and physical activity behaviors across seven semesters of college: Living on or off campus matters. Health Educ. Behav. Off. Publ. Soc. Public Health Educ. 2013, 40, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Soto, F.; Burgos, E. Diferencias en la masa muscular y el nivel de actividad física en estudiantes universitarios, según año de ingreso. J. Mov. Health 2015, 16, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palma-Leal, X.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, F.; Campos-Garzón, P.; Castillo-Paredes, A.; Chillón, P. New Self-Report Measures of Commuting Behaviors to University and Their Association with Sociodemographic Characteristics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Faulkner, G.E.J.; Buliung, R.N.; Flora, P.K.; Fusco, C. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2009, 48, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deforche, B.; Van Dyck, D.; Deliens, T.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I. Changes in weight, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary intake during the transition to higher education: A prospective study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Parra-Saldías, M.; Castro-Piñero, J.; Castillo Paredes, A.; Palma Leal, X.; Díaz Martínez, X.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, F. Active Commuting Behaviours from High School to University in Chile: A Retrospective Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 16, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lipošek, S.; Planinšec, J.; Leskošek, B.; Pajtler, A. Physical activity of university students and its relation to physical fitness and academic success. Ann. Kinesiol. 2018, 9, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ortega, F.B.; Ruiz, J.R.; Castillo, M.J.; Sjöström, M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: A powerful marker of health. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chrismas, B.C.R.; Majed, L.; Kneffel, Z. Physical fitness and physical self-concept of male and female young adults in Qatar. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223359. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fonseca-Camacho, D.F.; Hernández-Fonseca, J.M.; González-Ruíz, K.; Tordecilla-Sanders, A.; Ramírez-Vélez, R. A better self-perception of physical fitness is associated with lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components among university students. Nutr. Hosp. 2014, 31, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar]
  21. WMA. The World Medical Association-WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2020. Available online: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ (accessed on 28 March 2020).
  22. Palma-Leal, X.; Gómez, D.; Chillón, P.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, F. Fiabilidad de un cuestionario de modos, tiempo y distancia de desplazamiento en estudiantes universitarios. Retos 2020, 37, 210–214. [Google Scholar]
  23. Herrador-Colmenero, H.-C.; Perez-Garcia, M.; Ruiz, J.R.; Chillon, P. Assessing modes and frequency of commuting to school in youngsters: A systematic review. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2014, 26, 291–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chillón, P.; Herrador-Colmenero, M.; Migueles, J.H.; Cabanas-Sánchez, V.; Fernández-Santos, J.R.; Veiga, Ó.L.; Cas-tro-Piñero, J. Convergent validation of a questionnaire to assess the mode and frequency of commuting to and from school. Scand. J. Public Health 2017, 45, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Segura-Díaz, J.M.; Rojas-Jiménez, Á.; Barranco-Ruiz, Y.; Murillo-Pardo, B.; Saucedo-Araujo, R.G.; Aranda-Balboa, M.J.; He-rrador-Colmenero, M.; Villa-González, E.; Chillón, P. Feasibility and Reliability of a Questionnaire to Assess the Mode, Frequency, Distance and Time of Commuting to and from School: The PACO Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kek, C.C.; García Bengoechea, E.; Spence, J.C.; Mandic, S. The relationship between transport-to-school habits and physical activity in a sample of New Zealand adolescents. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019, 8, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rissel, C.; Curac, N.; Greenaway, M.; Bauman, A. Physical Activity Associated with Public Transport Use—A Review and Modelling of Potential Benefits. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2454–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ruiz-Tendero, G.; De Vicente, E.; Vegara-Meseguer, J. Sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in university students and workers. J. Sport Health Res. 2012, 4, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ortega, F.B.; Ruiz, J.R.; Espana-Romero, V.; Vicente-Rodriguez, G.; Martínez-Gómez, D.; Manios, Y.; Béghin, L.; Molnar, D.; Widhalm, K.; Moreno, L.A.; et al. The International Fitness Scale (IFIS): Usefulness of self-reported fitness in youth. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 40, 701–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Audrey, S.; Fisher, H.; Cooper, A.; Gaunt, D.; Metcalfe, C.; Garfield, K.; Hollingworth, W.; Procter, S.; Gabe-Walters, M.; Rodgers, S.; et al. A workplace-based intervention to increase levels of daily physical activity: The Travel to Work cluster RCT. Public Health Research 2019, 7, 1–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Henriques-Neto, D.; Peralta, M.; Garradas, S.; Pelegrini, A.; Pinto, A.A.; Sánchez-Miguel, P.A.; Marques, A. Active Commuting and Physical Fitness: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Arbinaga, F.; Fernández-Cuenca, S.; Fernández-Ozcorta, E.J.; Toscano-Hermoso, M.D.; Joaquin-Mingorance, M. Level of physical activity and sleep characteristics in university students. Sleep Sci. 2019, 12, 265–271. [Google Scholar]
  33. García-Puello, F.; Herazo-Beltrán, Y.; Vidarte-Claros, J.A.; García-Jiménez, R.; Crissien-Quiroz, E. Physical activity level assessment in university students by direct method. Rev. Salud Publica 2018, 20, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rodríguez, F.; Palma, X.; Romo, A.; Escobar, D.; Aragú, B.; Espinoza, L.; McMillan, N.; Gálvez, J. Eating habits, physical activity and socioeconomic level in university students of Chile. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Stathokostas, L.; McDonald, M.W.; Little, R.M.D.; Paterson, D.H. Flexibility of Older Adults Aged 55–86 Years and the Influence of Physical Activity. J. Aging Res. 2013, 2013, 743843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sahlqvist, S.; Song, Y.; Ogilvie, D. Is active travel associated with greater physical activity? The contribution of commuting and non-commuting active travel to total physical activity in adults. Prev. Med. 2012, 55, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yang, L.; Panter, J.; Griffin, S.J.; Ogilvie, D. Associations between active commuting and physical activity in working adults: Cross-sectional results from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study. Prev. Med. 2012, 55, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Cooper, A.R.; Page, A.S.; Foster, L.J.; Qahwaji, D. Commuting to school: Are children who walk more physically active? Am. J. Prev. Med. 2003, 25, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Østergaard, L.; Kolle, E.; Steene-Johannessen, J.; Anderssen, S.A.; Andersen, L.B. Cross sectional analysis of the association between mode of school transportation and physical fitness in children and adolescents. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2013, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vaara, J.P.; Kyröläinen, H.; Fogelholm, M.; Santtila, M.; Häkkinen, A.; Häkkinen, K.; Vasankari, T. Associations of Leisure Time, Commuting, and Occupational Physical Activity with Physical Fitness and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Young Men. J. Phys. Act. Health 2014, 11, 1482–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Andersen, L.B.; Lawlor, D.A.; Cooper, A.R.; Froberg, K.; Anderssen, S.A. Physical fitness in relation to transport to school in adolescents: The Danish youth and sports study. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2009, 19, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Geus, B.D.; Joncheere, J.; Meeusen, R. Commuter cycling: Effect on physical performance in untrained men and women in Flanders: Minimum dose to improve indexes of fitness. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2009, 19, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Møller, N.C.; Østergaard, L.; Gade, J.R.; Nielsen, J.L.; Andersen, L.B. The effect on cardiorespiratory fitness after an 8-week period of commuter cycling—A randomized controlled study in adults. Prev. Med. 2011, 53, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shephard, R.J. Is Active Commuting the Answer to Population Health? Sports Med. 2008, 38, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Healthcare 10 00990 g001a 550Healthcare 10 00990 g001b 550
Figure 1. Associations of mode of commuting and meeting MVPA recommendations with fitness in men. Notes: active, public, private = mode of commuting; MVPA = Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity; Meeting or Not meeting MVPA = MVPA recommendations; * = significant association with p < 0.05 between categorical groups.
Figure 1. Associations of mode of commuting and meeting MVPA recommendations with fitness in men. Notes: active, public, private = mode of commuting; MVPA = Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity; Meeting or Not meeting MVPA = MVPA recommendations; * = significant association with p < 0.05 between categorical groups.
Healthcare 10 00990 g001aHealthcare 10 00990 g001b
Healthcare 10 00990 g002 550
Figure 2. Associations of mode of commuting and meeting MVPA recommendations with fitness in women. Notes: active, public, private = mode of commuting; MVPA = Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity; Meeting or Not meeting MVPA = MVPA recommendations; * = significant association with p < 0.05 between categorical groups.
Figure 2. Associations of mode of commuting and meeting MVPA recommendations with fitness in women. Notes: active, public, private = mode of commuting; MVPA = Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity; Meeting or Not meeting MVPA = MVPA recommendations; * = significant association with p < 0.05 between categorical groups.
Healthcare 10 00990 g002
Table
Table 1. Descriptive data of the mode of commuting, PA and sedentary behavior and fitness of the participants, and significant differences in the gender.
Table 1. Descriptive data of the mode of commuting, PA and sedentary behavior and fitness of the participants, and significant differences in the gender.
All (n = 1257) Men (n = 598) Women (n = 659) p-Value
Mode of Commuting *
Active331 (26.3)206 (34.4)125 (19.0)<0.001
Public 791 (62.9)332 (55.5)459 (69.7)
Private135 (10.7)60 (10.0)75 (11.4)
PA and Sedentary Behavior
PA Levels *
Light482 (38.3)155 (25.9)327 (49.6)<0.001
Moderate 365 (29.0)184 (30.8)181 (27.5)
Vigorous 410 (32.6)259 (43.3)151 (22.9)
MVPA recommendations *
Not meeting701 (55.8)272 (45.5)429 (61.2)<0.001
Meeting556 (44.2)326 (54.5)230 (41.4)
Total PA (h/day) **1.5 ± 1.71.9 ± 1.81.2 ± 1.4 <0.001
Sedentary behavior (h/day) **6.5 ± 6.46.8 ± 6.96.2 ± 5.9 <0.001
Fitness **
General physical condition2.9 ± 1.03.2 ± 0.92.7 ± 0.9<0.001
Cardio-respiratory fitness2.8 ± 1.03.1 ± 1.02.5 ± 1.0<0.001
Muscular strength2.9 ± 0.93.2 ± 0.92.7 ± 0.9<0.001
Speed and agility3.1 ± 0.93.4 ± 0.92.7 ± 0.9<0.001
Flexibility2.8 ± 1.02.8 ± 1.02.9 ± 1.0<0.001
General health3.6 ± 0.93.8 ± 0.93.4 ± 0.8<0.001
Notes: * = n (%); ** = X ± SD; X ± SD = mean ± standard deviation; PA = physical activity.
Table
Table 2. Associations of mode of commuting with PA, sedentary behavior and fitness of the participants by gender.
Table 2. Associations of mode of commuting with PA, sedentary behavior and fitness of the participants by gender.
Mode of Commuting to University *
MenWomen
ActivePublicActivePublic
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
PA and Sedentary Behavior
PA Levels
LightRef. Ref.Ref.Ref.
Moderate 2.509 (1.14, 5.14)1.820 (0.86, 3.85)1.315 (0.67, 2.54)1.041 (0.59, 1.81)
Vigorous 1.478 (0.75, 2.90)1.365 (0.72, 2.57)2.580 (1.14, 5.81)2.028 (0.98, 4.18)
MVPA recommendations
Not meetingRef. Ref.Ref.Ref.
Meeting1.351 (1.16, 2.04)1.229 (0.74, 2,24)2.031 (1.08, 3.81)1.577 (0.90, 2.74)
Total PA0.898 (0.77, 1.04)0.956 (0.83, 1.09)1.297 (1.01, 1.65)1.218 (0.97, 1.52)
Sedentary behavior0.856 (0.32, 1.07)0.703 (0.39, 1.24)0.301 (0.16, 0.54)0.421 (0.25, 0.69)
Fitness
General physical condition1.077 (0.80, 1.44)1.217 (0.91, 1.61)0.749 (0.55, 1.01)0.813 (0.62, 1.05)
Cardio-respiratory fitness1.154 (0.87, 1.52)1.229 (0.94, 1.60)0.784 (0.59, 1.03)0.858 (0.67, 1.08)
Muscular strength1.691 (1.22, 2.33)1.597 (1.17, 2.17)1.267 (0.94, 1.70)1.214 (0.94, 1.56)
Speed and agility1.205 (0.89, 1.62)1.309 (0.98, 1.74)1.074 (0.78, 1.46)1.045 (0.80, 1.35)
Flexibility1.134 (0.86, 1.49)1.249 (0.96, 1.62)1.256 (0.95, 1.65)1.295 (1.02, 1.63)
General health 1.219 (0.87, 1.70)1.399 (1.01, 1.09)0.936 (0.67, 1.29)1.171 (0.88, 1.54)
Notes: OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; Ref. = reference; PA = physical activity; MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity; bold = significant association with p < 0.05; * = private commuting was established as reference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palma-Leal, X.; Parra-Saldías, M.; Aubert, S.; Chillón, P. Active Commuting to University Is Positively Associated with Physical Activity and Perceived Fitness. Healthcare 2022, 10, 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10060990

AMA Style

Palma-Leal X, Parra-Saldías M, Aubert S, Chillón P. Active Commuting to University Is Positively Associated with Physical Activity and Perceived Fitness. Healthcare. 2022; 10(6):990. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10060990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palma-Leal, Ximena, Maribel Parra-Saldías, Salomé Aubert, and Palma Chillón. 2022. "Active Commuting to University Is Positively Associated with Physical Activity and Perceived Fitness" Healthcare 10, no. 6: 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10060990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop