Next Article in Journal
The Relationship of Internet Gaming Addiction and Suicidal Ideation among Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Negative Emotion and the Moderating Role of Hope
Previous Article in Journal
The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Awareness Status of Schistosomiasis among School-Aged Students in Two Schools on Pemba Island, Zanzibar: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS

1
Nursing School, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3
Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, 1090 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043374
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2023 / Accepted: 13 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Conditions: Issues and Challenges)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Today, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is effectively used as a lifelong therapy to treat people living with HIV (PLWH) to suppress viral replication. Moreover, PLWH need an adequate care strategy in an interprofessional, networked setting of health care professionals from different disciplines. HIV/AIDS poses challenges to both patients and health care professionals within the framework of care due to frequent visits to physicians, avoidable hospitalizations, comorbidities, complications, and the resulting polypharmacy. The concepts of integrated care (IC) represent sustainable approaches to solving the complex care situation of PLWH. Aims: This study aimed to describe the national and international models of integrated care and their benefits regarding PLWH as complex, chronically ill patients in the health care system. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the current national and international innovative models and approaches to integrated care for people with HIV/AIDS. The literature search covered the period between March and November 2022 and was conducted in the databases Cinahl, Cochrane, and Pubmed. Quantitative and qualitative studies, meta-analyses, and reviews were included. Results: The main findings are the benefits of integrated care (IC) as an interconnected, guideline- and pathway-based multiprofessional, multidisciplinary, patient-centered treatment for PLWH with complex chronic HIV/AIDS. This includes the evidence-based continuity of care with decreased hospitalization, reductions in costly and burdensome duplicate testing, and the saving of overall health care costs. Furthermore, it includes motivation for adherence, the prevention of HIV transmission through unrestricted access to ART, the reduction and timely treatment of comorbidities, the reduction of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, palliative care, and the treatment of chronic pain. IC is initiated, implemented, and financed by health policy in the form of integrated health care, managed care, case and care management, primary care, and general practitioner-centered concepts for the care of PLWH. Integrated care was originally founded in the United States of America. The complexity of HIV/AIDS intensifies as the disease progresses. Conclusions: Integrated care focuses on the holistic view of PLWH, considering medical, nursing, psychosocial, and psychiatric needs, as well as the various interactions among them. A comprehensive expansion of integrated care in primary health care settings will not only relieve the burden on hospitals but also significantly improve the patient situation and the outcome of treatment.

1. Introduction

In the European Union (EU), approximately 25,000 people were newly diagnosed with HIV in 2021 [1,2]. A total of 85% of newly detected cases are diagnosed at a late disease stage (defined as less than 350 CD4 cells per mm3) [3]. Compared to low-income countries, people living with HIV (PLWH) in Europe mostly have unrestricted access to antiretroviral therapy (ART). This therapy has fundamentally changed the course of the HIV pandemic due to an effective lifelong viral replication suppression [4,5]. Furthermore, ART has significantly reduced mortality and morbidity [6,7,8]. ART also reduces opportunistic infections and the incidences of comorbidities, multimorbidity, and complications [9]. The requirement for this is to achieve adherence of at least 95% [10]. Despite the normalization of life expectancy, the incidences of carcinoma, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic pain with opiate abuse, and hypertension accumulate to a complex multifactorial situation [11,12,13,14,15]. Health care systems are currently characterized by many actors operating in different sub-areas. Thus, physicians in private practice, institutes, laboratories, and social insurance institutions, as well as in outpatient and inpatient areas of hospitals, are involved in prevention and diagnosis to therapy and rehabilitation. Patients therefore pass through a series of care transitions and interfaces within the health care system, which must be overcome. This is where the concept of integrated care comes in. The aim is to optimize transitions between different areas of treatment and specialties and to make the interfaces between the sub-areas holistic, efficient, effective, and patient-oriented.
Complex chronic diseases pose significant challenges to health care professionals in the management of PLWH in the 21st century and necessitate a redesign of health care systems [16]. Frequent physician visits, avoidable hospitalizations, polypharmacy, and an increasing need for long-term care are the consequences of an unstructured, cost-intensive treatment that is burdensome for patients and health care systems [17], especially in resource-limited settings and those missing adequate structures with health care professionals [18,19]. Furthermore, the demographic development and the increase in complexity due to the long duration of HIV disease require integrated strategies for patient care [20]. The HIV-specific multifactorial situation combined with smoking [21], drug abuse anxiety, depression, and addictive disorders proves that PLWH need an adequate care strategy in a setting of health care professionals from multiprofessional disciplines [22,23]. Moreover, PLWH do not seek appropriate specialists when needed due to the fear of discrimination and stigmatization [24]. Furthermore, in the context of reproductive medicine, especially for women with HIV, integrated care models for women of childbearing potential are beneficial, both during pregnancy and after birth, from the perspective of the mother and the newborn [25,26]. The diagnosis and treatment of accompanying diseases (tuberculosis and hepatis B and C, especially in African countries) cannot be treated optimally in non-specialized treatment centers [19,27].
The effectiveness of ART to suppress the viral load dramatically reduces the likelihood of onward transmission, and treatment as prevention is becoming increasingly evident [28,29,30]. Using a wide variety of additional diagnoses of PLWH as examples, the data also demonstrate that integrated care reduces hospitalization in the clinical setting and saves high costs faced by health care systems [31,32]. Throughout different health care systems, integrated care is a viable solution to the growing demand for improved experiences and health outcomes of patients with multimorbidity and those requiring long-term care [33].
IC guarantees the discharge of the health care system through an interaction of services from different professional groups [34,35]. Health policy considerations for the care of people with complex chronic diseases and the development of evidence-based guidelines and concepts have become more present [36]. Sustainable approaches to dealing with the complex situation of PLWH with multiple chronic diseases represent the concepts of integrated care but also other disease, case, and care management strategies [37].

2. Aims

Integrated care is a comprehensive concept with multiple implementation strategies, and the goal herein was to summarize them and demonstrate their applicability and effectiveness for improved treatment outcomes in PLWHIV.

3. Methods

A narrative review with a comprehensive literature search was conducted between March and November 2022. The data extraction of the results was oriented toward the central theme of integrated care regarding PLWH. In contrast to systematic reviews, no standard definition exists for narrative reviews. The data extraction, as well as analysis, was guided by the PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews [38,39].

4. Search Strategy

A literature search was performed in the databases Pubmed, CINAHL, and Cochrane. The keywords for the search were HIV/AIDS, integrated care, chronic diseases, disease management, case management, adherence, stigmatizing, discrimination, complication, and cognitive disorder. The search was limited to English- and German-language studies.

5. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The target group of the studies was PLWH, possibly in combination with other chronic diseases. Qualitative and quantitative studies, including randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, were included. Non-empirical studies were explicitly excluded. A total of 119 quantitative and qualitative studies, as well as metanalyses and systematic reviews, were analyzed.

6. Results

6.1. Challenges in the Care of People with HIV as a Chronic Disease

HIV/AIDS as a chronic disease, despite modern antiretroviral therapy over the course of the disease career, can continue to develop into complex challenges due to the development of comorbidities [40]. Acute medical care related to organic complications of the pre-existing HIV disease is the determining factor. This means that the momentary problem is focused on leaving chronicity in the background, but as a causative condition. Additionally, there is a lack of flexibility and interdisciplinarity, as well as an awareness of an interlocking treatment approach to successfully manage the alternating phases of disease progression between the acute and chronic phases [41]. In addition, the inadequate training, information, and participation of PLWH, as well as of caregivers on the treatment team, lead to avoidable dependence and passivity [42]. Evidence-based guidelines, where treatment pathways and strategies are mapped in a process-based manner and ensure optimal patient-centered care, are either insufficient or do not acquire the attention that they need [35,43]. In particular, by reducing repeated, cost-intensive hospitalizations, a significant reduction in financial and personnel burdens on the health care system, as well as on the patients themselves, can be achieved [44].

6.2. Definition of and Strategies for Integrated Care

Today, caring for PLWH with complex health- and disease-related but also psychosocial needs continues to be a major challenge for the health care system to manage. Integrated care appears to be one answer to this problem, with collaboration and integration efforts among components of care systems, professionals, and service providers, aimed at improving the efficiency and appropriateness, as well as patient-centeredness, of care [34,45]. Patients with chronic conditions are challenged to navigate a number of interfaces within the health care system as part of their disease progression. IC addresses the interfaces of the multidisciplinary setting (Figure 1), with the goal of optimizing the transitions between disciplines for diagnostics and therapy, including additional areas, such as psychologists, nurses, social workers, and other counseling professions, in a patient-friendly, holistic, efficient, patient-centered, and effective manner [46].
Through standardized treatment processes of integrated care, both the quality of therapy and economic efficiency are increased by saving costs for health policy [47]. The health care system in many European countries is typified by a variety of different professional groups and specialist disciplines acting in different sub-areas.
This ranges from the activities of general practitioners, special institutes, laboratories, social insurance institutions, and radiology for imaging diagnostics to inpatient and outpatient settings in hospitals, as well as prevention and therapy in rehabilitation centers [48,49]. IC has become established in Europe and represents a form of care management in which the focus is on the treatment process of the chronically ill person [50,51]. There is not yet a standard definition of integrated care. The term arose in the context of managed care in the USA and describes various aspects in the design of patient care, the essential features of which are based on the more optimal networking of different service providers, the mobilization of efficiency reserves, and measures that contribute to quality assurance [52,53]. A significant part of integrated care focuses on the process of treatment rather than the individual case, so the interprofessional and interdisciplinary health care professionals are connected and communicate with each other via interfaces [48].
IC refers to measures and processes that contribute to better interprofessional networking and collaboration among all health care professionals and that optimally coordinate the treatment and care of patients across the entire treatment pathway [54]. On the one hand, integrated care is based on the networking of primary, secondary, and tertiary structures and, on the other hand, on the interdisciplinary coordination of general practitioners, specialists, social workers, case and care managers, nurses, and other health care professionals (physiotherapists and nutritionists) (Figure 1).
The gap of discontinuity between clinical and extramural settings is thus narrowed for patients [55,56]. PLWH in particular benefit from Integrated HIV Care (ICH), a model of care in which specialists from multiple disciplines (Figure 1) collaborate in a clinical setting that is geographically and temporally unrestricted. The goal is to provide PLWH with continuity of care [57,58] in the primary care setting for their complex health problems and the management of ART, co-morbidities, and multimorbidities (hepatitis B and C, intravenous drug use, psychiatric disorders, anxiety, depression, substance abuse, tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension). Integrated care strategies are dependent on health policy funding, organizational and administrative factors, the provision of various needs-based services, and clinical and medical aspects [45].

6.3. Concept of Integrated Care

Integrated care has replaced old forms of care in a needs-based and patient-oriented manner. From a political perspective, the affordability of the health care system is also a motivating factor to implement integrated care.
In a national and international comparison, it was found that various models are available for integrated care and managed care (Table 1). In the GP-relief model, the aim is to offer patients with multimorbidities needs-oriented care, with the emphasis on teaching everyday skills to achieve a better quality of life and to have a positive influence on the course of the disease (source). In an international comparison, it was found that, in Spain, there is the Badalona Serveis Assistencials (BSA) program, which is focused on the care of older people with frailty and complex and multiple chronic diseases and cognitive impairment. It is a person-centered program, with medical services, social support, and emergency care available in a networked fashion [59]. The South Somerset Symphony Program, established in England, is about strengthening primary care, with the Enhanced Primary and Complex Care Model available for complex cases with specially trained health care professionals.
The care programs are available for patients and for family caregivers, where coaching regarding resources is also offered [61].
In Germany, the concept “Casaplus” exists as geriatric case management, where trained case managers coordinate relevant health care services with each other in the context of information, counselling, and support, as well as monitoring, for people with chronic diseases [62].
The Health Network Tennengau is a low-threshold care system between primary care and the hospital, with handover and takeover visits in the inpatient setting, the transmission of doctor’s letters and findings to the general practitioner, a hospice initiative, the dissemination of population health information on weight reduction and dementia, and senior counseling [63]. In addition, the “Diabetes under control” program for optimized diabetes care exists in Austria specifically for patients with diabetes mellitus [64].

6.4. Disease Management and Case Management

As defined by the Disease Management Association of America [65] disease management is a multidisciplinary, continuous approach to health care for populations with defined conditions or at risk of developing certain conditions. Disease management, or chronic disease management, supports the improvement of the physician–patient relationship; prevents exacerbation and the development of complications and comorbidities through prevention and evidence-based, cost-effective treatment strategies; and involves a continuous evaluation process of medical, economic, and patient-centered outcomes.
Accordingly, disease management means the degree to which patients, health care providers, and other members of the health care professional community follow a rational therapeutic strategy [66].
In contrast to disease management and integrated care (Figure 2), case management is another important organizational form in integrated care and is focused on a specific patient group (those who are seriously ill, those who are disabled, and the elderly). It is a targeted case-based care strategy. Case management can therefore also be described in the broadest sense as an individualized disease management strategy. In case management, certain patients (e.g., patients after organ transplantation, patients with AIDS, patients after stroke or craniocerebral trauma, and oncology patients with complex antitumor therapies) are identified within the framework of care, and they are characterized by peculiarities in their care history due to frequent (re)hospitalizations, repeated or even failed surgical interventions, complicated medical courses of disease and treatment, and complex therapy regimens. This group of patients usually require medical, nursing, psychological, social, rehabilitative, and psychiatric care. Patients are usually not able to cope with this complexity of requirements on their own. This multidisciplinary task is taken over by case managers, who provide a concrete coordination of the care process, including advice on social or financial matters [67]. Additionally, in the interdisciplinary care context for PLWH, service providers such as “buddy programs,” peer workers, voluntary and certified counselors are also involved. Self-help organizations for the informal exchange of experiential knowledge in coping with HIV are also particularly helpful for both patients and family members.

6.5. The Complexity of HIV

Complex chronic diseases are characterized by medical, psychosocial, socioeconomic, and psychiatric determinants (Figure 3).
The complexity of HIV (Figure 4) has shifted due to the potential for rapid diagnosis and immediate treatment [70]. Although ART has improved in terms of dosing frequency and low side effects, adherence to the treatment regimen remains a challenge for many PLWH and is the main reason for ART failure [71]. If viral replication suppression is inadequate, the risk of developing resistance to ART agents increases [72]. Furthermore, complications and AIDS-defining sequelae, carcinomas, and infections arise from the reduction in the CD4 cell count and, thus, the destruction of the immune system [73]. The prevention of transmission is also no longer ensured. Poor adherence to ART is related to the complexity of the treatment regimen, medication side effects, patient beliefs about treatment efficacy, and access to care [74]. In addition, complexity arises from HIV itself (Figure 4), as well as from the consequences of the long-term toxicity of ART, comorbidities, substance abuse, alcohol abuse, mental disorders such as depression, hepatitis C infections, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart diseases, obesity, metabolic disorders, hypertension, and kidney diseases [75,76]. To effectively prevent comorbidities, ICH involves specialists of internal medicine, psychiatry and ophthalmology and individuals from other professions, such as social workers, in primary HIV care at an early stage [70,72].
The specificity of presenting the individual components of the different categories comes from the clustering of the individual aspects and the exacerbation of the overall situation. The challenge in the care of PLWH often lies in the management of social factors [72]. HIV management includes medication and care optimization, symptom management, self-care education, comorbidity management, and continuity care, as well as emotional and social support. For the treatment of common depression, collaboration between different disciplines also delivers an improvement in PLWH in the primary care setting as a disease management program [77].

6.6. Benefits of Integrated Care for PLWH

The benefits of integrated care for PLWH have been researched and mapped thematically in the current literature in a very heterogeneous way. The greatest benefit of integrated care is the saving of financial resources. Significant benefits from the patient’s perspective are reduced waiting times and treatment times and less frequent contact with physicians due to the optimized coordination of individual health care professionals. In addition, duplicate examinations and findings are avoided. Furthermore, transparency and the flow of information are increased, and a structured treatment plan based on objective criteria is used. Structured care also enables quality control and assurance for chronically ill patients.
The benefits of integrated care include enormous potential savings, especially through the improved management of interfaces, whilst maintaining and improving the quality of treatment. The avoidance of unnecessary additional examinations, shorter sick leave, and the efficient and effective provision of medicines and other remedies free up resources that can be used for other important areas. Integrated care benefits not only patients, taxpayers, and health policy makers but also the service providers themselves. They follow proven, evidence-based treatment pathways, as well as guidelines, thus optimizing treatment quality and patient outcomes. In addition, the successful treatment of patients without hurdles and waiting times increases overall satisfaction and enhances planning reliability, as well as patients’ motivation and consistency to adhere to and cooperate with treatment management [78]. The benefits of integrated care are primarily argued by the continuous, process-driven, planned interprofessional and multidisciplinary collaboration of individuals from the most important health care disciplines, especially in the extramural setting.
People living with HIV are considered a particularly vulnerable patient population due to their complex medical and psychosocial needs.
The provision of a comprehensive multidisciplinary care system has been the most effective option for PLWH for effective and continuous treatment. Unlike countries with a high HIV prevalence, a large population density, poverty, a lack of hygiene standards, no full access to health care or access to ART, high-income countries additionally face stigma and discrimination [79]. Due to the continuum of complications, additional symptoms with burdens, polypharmacy, and the resulting side effects and interactions, HIV/AIDS can occur in a very complex condition image [72]. Resilience in particular is also necessary for PLWH to cope, and a complex disease course can result because PLWH with low resilience become particularly vulnerable [80]. This vulnerability is seen as post-traumatic stress, depression and anxiety, and a lack of adherence. The concept of integrated care can identify and treat mental health symptoms, such as anxiety and adherence issues, as well as other effects, in a timely manner through timely assessments [81]. The Kaiser Permanente (KP) model for chronically ill patients from the United States is suitable for adapting integrated care to PLWH. The KP model of IC is based on the stratification of PLWH for the targeted, needs-based delivery of various services. In addition to the treatment of the HIV infection, the services include prevention and monitoring and the minimizing of risk factors for potential complications and resulting comorbidities. PLWH receive additional support in self-managing their disease, with the goal of achieving the highest possible level of health literacy [82]. PLWH as high-risk patients receive disease and case management combined with targeted professional care from health care professionals. The core components of the KP model are prevention, self-management support, disease management, and case and care management (Figure 5). The first component of integrated care is based on HIV prevention for the entire population. PLWH are included, provided that patients have a high adherence with the outcome: Undetectable is Untransmittable (U=U) [1,83]. The next stage is characterized by support for the development of self-management strategies for PLWH as chronically ill patients with stable situations. If needed, health care professionals in integrated care are available to PLWH. If the patients have a high level of health literacy, PLWH make targeted and independent decisions to use the appropriate service. The penultimate stage corresponds to disease management for patients with an already complex disease situation, as well as a high risk of additional complications that have a massive negative impact on the existing HIV infection. The top level is associated with case and care management and the involvement of the entire network of IC [33,84].

7. Discussion

The national and international concepts and models of integrated care, including the benefits for PLWH, could be presented comprehensively in this review. In addition, this review focuses on the complexity of HIV/AIDS in the context of chronic disease. The complexity of HIV infection with the specific problems (ART, adherence, disease management, comorbidities, symptoms, side effects, long-term toxicities, lifestyle, obesity, a lack of exercise, nicotine abuse, and alcohol and drug abuse) and implicit experiences and burdens (stigma, discrimination, hopelessness, anxiety, depression, isolation, and loneliness) of PLWH establish the need for integrated care to be a necessary patient-centered approach to treatment [72,85,86]. The term integrated care is not uniformly defined and is often used as a synonym for different models of care [56,63,87]. The collaborative participation of physicians with health care professionals from other professions represent the pillars of integrated care for PLWH [88].
In addition to HIV specialists, PLWH care require psychologists, nurses, and social workers, as well as specialists from other disciplines [89]. Contrary to classical chronic diseases, stigma and discrimination are major determinants that negatively affect disease progression and adherence [86,90]. Through the multiprofessional network of integrated care, PLWH are shown to have stability in their relationships with health care professionals, especially in countries with a lack of infrastructure [91]. Studies clearly demonstrate that a lack of adherence is a trigger for the development of complications and comorbidities [92]. Ferlatte et al. (2022) [93] confirm in their study the associations between poverty, HIV, gender, and racial stigma and the impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and viral suppression on adherence. Galani et al., (2021) [94] confirm the complexity of HIV as the early detection, targeted treatment of comorbidities and the prevention of additional diseases through the expansion and improvement of a continuous record of health data to compensate for a lack of interprofessional communication. Additionally, this has been shown to prevent the majority of comorbidities (tuberculosis, hepatitis C, the burden of fatigue, and cancer) [95,96]. Due to the multiplicity of symptoms, there is a mutual clustering and, thus, the amplification of individual symptoms (depression, pain, fatigue, anxiety, loneliness, and isolation), with the potentiation of the overall burden and an increase in costs for the health system quality of life [47,97,98]. Studies show that particularly vulnerable populations (sex workers, intravenous drug users with and without methadone programs, and homeless people) with HIV do not always benefit optimally from ART without ongoing support from professionals [1,99,100]. Barba et al., (2016) [101] describe the coordination of patient-centered care for PLWH between primary care and the hospital setting, where numerous medical comorbidities with polypharmacy are successfully treated [102]. Further, integrated care has been shown to be particularly important in PLWH in the palliative setting in relation to stigma and poverty, as well as severe untreated pain, with people in the study describing a longing for death due to the pain [103]. The stigma experience starting from health care professionals in clinical settings in countries with high poverty is particularly stressful for PLWH and is largely avoided through integrated care (Islam et al., 2015) [104]. Ferlatte et al., (2022) [93] highlight the link, particularly among MSMs, between experiences of stigma and increased suicidality.
Integrated care counters this through therapeutic impartiality, empathy through compassionate care, social support, and appreciative and non-judgmental communication [105]. Moreover, integrated care aims to promote health literacy with PLWH’s ability to use health services on their own and build resilience and self-efficacy to cope with the complex situation [29,106]. In particular, in remote African countries, life expectancy can be increased by 75 percent compared to people without access to health care [98,107]. Overall, it should be noted that the implementation of all integrated care models and concepts depends primarily on health policy funding [108,109].

8. Limitations

The following limitations arose in the context of this review: (1) Due to the heterogeneity and complexity of PLWH as a patient group, children and adolescents were explicitly excluded. (2) Only studies in English and German published in scientific journals were included. This could lead to the exclusion of relevant literature published in gray literature, or studies from other regions using languages such as Portuguese, French, and local African languages. (3) Some studies referred to countries in Africa and India with a high HIV prevalence with limited universal health coverage. The results cannot be generalized to industrialized countries. (4) The chosen methodology does not allow for generally valid global conclusions about the benefits of integrated care. (5) In the studies included, the individual professional groups working together in integrated care sometimes differed significantly. This has implications for the different, country-specific legal competencies of health care professionals. (6) Narrative reviews do not involve rigorous assessments of study quality because the focus is on capturing the range of work that provides information on the topic and not limiting the work to studies that meet certain standards of scientific rigor.

9. Conclusions

Our review shows that integrated care for PLWH is potentially feasible and associated with high patient outcomes. In addition, a holistic patient-centered view of PLWH, including medical, nursing, psychosocial, and psychiatric needs, as well as the various interactions among them, must be considered in planning. Moreover, health inequalities for PLWH, such as uniform unrestricted access to health care and interprofessional treatment of comorbidities, as well as AIDS-defining diseases, and for PLWH with substance abuse and social problems need to be implemented in the key competencies of health care professionals. Prospectively, future research on integrated care is particularly needed for PLWH but also for other patients with specific complex diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B.; methodology, literature search, H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B.; writing—review I.G. and T.E.D.; visualization, H.B.; supervision, T.E.D. and I.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is not available due to privacy and ethical guidelines.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. UNAIDS. Fact Sheet. Global HIV Statistics. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2022).
  2. Robert Koch Institute. Available online: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2021/47/Art_01.html (accessed on 18 October 2022).
  3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/hiv.htm (accessed on 18 October 2022).
  4. Lin, L.; Li, T.S. Multidisciplinary collaborative integrated management of increasingly prominent HIV complications in the post-cART era. HIV Med. 2020, 21, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Palella, F.J.; Delaney, K.M.; Moorman, A.C.; Loveless, M.O.; Fuhrer, J.; Satten, G.A.; Aschman, D.J.; Ph, R.; Holmberg, S.D. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, X.; Wu, Z. Factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV/AIDS patients in rural China. AIDS 2007, 21 (Suppl. S8), 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Inzaule, S.C.; Kroeze, S.; Kityo, C.M.; Siwale, M.; Akanmu, S.; Wellington, M.; de Jager, M.; Ive, P.; Mandaliya, K.; Stevens, W.; et al. Long-term HIV treatment outcomes and associated factors in sub-Saharan Africa: Multicountry longitudinal cohort analysis. Aids 2022, 36, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Feneloni, A.; Boudreaux, M. Life and Death in the American City: Men’s Life Expectancy in 25 major American Cities From 1990 to 2015. Demography 2019, 56, 2349–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carneiro, P.B.; Westmoreland, D.A.; Patel, V.V.; Grov, C. Awareness and Acceptability of Undetectable = Untransmittable Among a U.S. National Sample of HIV-Negative Sexual and Gender Minorities. AIDS Behav. 2020, 25, 643–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, S.-H.; Gerver, S.M.; Fidler, S.; Ward, H. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adolescents with HIV: Systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2014, 28, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ruzicka, D.; Imai, K.; Takahashi, K.; Naito, T. Greater burden of chronic comorbidities and co-medications among people living with HIV versus people without HIV in Japan: A hospital claims database study. J. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 25, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Timpel, P.; Lang, C.; Wens, J.; Contel, J.C.; Schwarz, P. The Manage Care Model—Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes. Int. J. Integr. Care 2020, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cooke, A.; Saleem, H.; Hassan, S.; Mushi, D.; Mbwambo, J.; Lambdin, B. Patient and provider perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators of an integrated opioid treatment and HIV care intervention. Addict. Sci. Clin. Pract. 2019, 14, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McCombe, G.; Lim, J.; Van Hout, M.C.; Lazarus, J.V.; Bachmann, M.; Jaffar, S.; Garrib, A.; Ramaiya, K.; Sewankambo, N.K.; Mfinanga, S.; et al. Integrating Care for Diabetes and Hypertension with HIV Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Integr. Care 2022, 22, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rich, K.M.; Bia, J.; Altice, F.L.; Feinberg, J. Integrated Models of Care for Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder: How Do We Prevent HIV and HCV. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018, 15, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Competence Center Integrierte Versorgung (CCIV). Available online: https://www.cciv.at/cdscontent/?contentid=10007.863932&portal=ccivportal (accessed on 20 October 2022).
  17. Kjaer, A.; Rasmussen, T.A.; Hjollund, N.H.; Rodkjaer, L.O.; Storgaard, M. Patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practice in HIV outpatient care. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 69, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Njuguna, B.; Vorkoper, S.; Patel, P.; Reid, M.J.A.; Vedanthan, R.; Pfaff, C.; Park, P.H.; Fischer, L.; Laktabai, J.; Pastakia, S.D. Models of integration of HIV and noncommunicable disease care in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned and evidence gaps. AIDS 2018, 32 (Suppl. S1), 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Delive, R.P.; Million, B.; Regis, R.M.; Mogasweri, N.; Jude, I. Nurses’ Knowledge of Tuberculosis, HIV, and Integrated HIV/TB Care Policies in Rural Western Cape, South Africa. J. Assoc. Nurses AIDS Care 2018, 29, 876–886. [Google Scholar]
  20. Schäffer, D.; Hämel, K. Gemeinsam eine gute Versorgung sichern. Integrierte Gesundheitszentren. Die Schwest. Der Pfleg. 2018, 57, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  21. Langebeek, N.; Gisolf, E.H.; Reiss, P.; Vervoort, S.C.; Hafsteinsdóttir, T.B.; Richter, C.; Sprangers, M.A.; Nieuwkerk, P.T. Predictors and correlates of adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for chronic HIV infection: A meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Labbe, A.K.; Wilner, J.G.; Kosiba, J.D.; Gonzalez, A.; Smits, J.A.; Zvolensky, M.J.; Norton, P.J.; O’Cleirigh, C. Demonstration of an Integrated Treatment for Smoking Cessation and Anxiety Symptoms in People With HIV: A Clinical Case Study. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 2016, 24, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Herce, M.E.; Morse, J.; Luhanga, D.; Harris, J.; Smith, H.J.; Besa, S.; Samungole, G.; Kanchey, N.; Muyoyeta, M.; Reid, S.E. Integrating HIV care and treatment into tuberculosis clinics in Lusaka, Zambia: Results from a before-after quasi-experimental study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ho, S.-S.; Holloway, A. The impact of HIV-related stigma on the lives of HIV-positive women: An integrated literature review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2015, 25, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Colombini, M.; Mayhew, S.H.; Mutemwa, R.; Kivunaga, J.; Ndwiga, C. Perceptions and Experiences of Integrated Service Delivery Among Women Living with HIV Attending Reproductive Health Services in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study. AIDS Behav. 2016, 20, 2130–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Geelhoed, D.; Lafort, Y.; Chissale, E.; Candrinho, B.; Degomme, O. Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: Structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2013, 13, 207–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Birungi, J.; Kivuyo, S.; Garrib, A.; Mugenyi, L.; Mutungi, G.; Namakoola, I.; Mghamba, J.; Ramaiya, K.; Wang, D.; Maongezi, S.; et al. Integrating health services for HIV infection, diabetes and hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: A cohort study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e053412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bukenya, D.; Van Hout, M.-C.; Shayo, E.H.; Kitabye, I.; Junior, B.M.; Kasidi, J.R.; Birungi, J.; Jaffar, S.; Seeley, J. Integrated healthcare services for HIV, diabetes mellitus and hypertension in selected health facilities in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda: A qualitative methods study. PLoS Glob. Public Health 2022, 2, e0000084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaunda-Khangamwa, B.; Maposa, I.; Phiri, M.; Malisita, K.; Mtagalume, E.; Chigaru, L.; Munthali, A.; Chipeta, E.; Phiri, S.; Manderson, L. Service Use and Resilience among Adolescents Living with HIV in Blantyre, Malawi. Int. J. Integr. Care 2021, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hibbert, M.; Crenna-Jennings, W.; Kirwan, L.; Benton, L.; Lut, I.; Okala, S.; Asboe, D.; Jeffries, J.; Kunda, C.; Mbewe, R.; et al. The people living with HIV stigma survey UK 2015: HIV-related sexual rejection and other experiences of stigma and discrimination among gay and heterosexual men. AIDS Care 2018, 30, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Druss, B.G.; Rohrbaugh, R.M.; Levinson, C.M.; Rosenheck, R.A. Integrated Medical Care for Patients with Serous Psychiatric Illness. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2018, 58, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casas, A.; Troosters, T.; Garcia-Aymerich, J.; Roca, J.; Hernandez, C.; Alonso, A.; Del Pozo, F.; De Toledo, P.; Anto, J.M.; Rodriguez-Roisin, R.; et al. Integrated carte prevents hospitalisation for exacerbations in COPD patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 28, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. WHO. Integrated Care Models: An Overview. The Population-Based Model. 2016. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/322475/Integrated-care-models-overview.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2022).
  34. Valentijn, P.P.; Schepman, S.M.; Opheij, W.; Bruijnzeels, M.A. Understanding integrated care: A comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int. J. Integr. Care 2013, 13, e010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ouwens, M.; Wollersheim, H.; Hermens, R.; Hulscher, M.; Grol, R. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: A review of systematic reviews. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2005, 17, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Uebel, K.; Guise, A.; Georgeu, D.; Colvin, C.; Lewin, S. Integrating HIV care into nurse-led primary health care services in South Africa: A synthesis of three linked qualitative studies. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2013, 13, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Nganga, P.; Mathai, M.; Obondo, A.; Mutavi, T.; Kumar, M. Undetected psychiatric morbidity among HIV/AIDS patients attending Comprehensive Care Clinic (CCC) in Nairobi Kenya: Towards an integrated mental health care. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2018, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Panic, N.; Leoncini, E.; De Belvis, G.; Ricciardi, W.; Boccia, S. Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Pautasso, M. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hébert, R.; Durand, P.; Dubuc, N.; Tourigny, A. PRISMA: A new model of integrated service delivery for the frail older people in Canada. Int. J. Integr. Care 2003, 3, e08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Briggs, A.; Valentijn, P.; Thiyagarasjan, J.; De Carvalho, I.A. Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: A review of reviews. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e021194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Clayman, M.L.; Bylund, C.L.; Chewning, B.; Makoul, G. The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical Encounters: A Systematic Review. Med. Decis. Mak. 2016, 36, 427–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Graf, C. Disease Management Programme und Integrierte Versorgung. Gesundh.-Und Soz. 2006, 60, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Damery, S.; Flanagan, S.; Combes, G. Does integrated care reduce hospital activity for patients with chronic diseases? An umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kodner, D.L.; Spreeuwenberg, C. Integrated care: Meaning, logic, applications, and implications—A discussion paper. Int. J. Integr. Care 2022, 2, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mühlbacher, A. Integrierte Versorgung: Management und Organisation: Eine Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Analyse von Unternehmensnetzwerken der Gesundheitsversorgung, 1st ed.; Hans Huber: Bern, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Marino, M.; De Belvis, A.G.; Tanzariello, M.; Dotti, E.; Bucci, S.; Colotto, M.; Ricciardi, W.; Boccia, S. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of integrated care models for elderly, complex patients: A narrative review. Don’t we need a value-based approach? Int. J. Care Coord. 2018, 21, 120–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Becka, S.; Schauppenlehner, M. Integrierte Versorgung—Aufbruch Zu Neuen Wegen—Verkürzte Fassung. Available online: https://www.sozialversicherung.at/cdscontent/load?contentid=10008.714205&version=1391184549 (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  49. Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. Wichtiger Akteure Im Deutschen Gesundheitswesen. Available online: https://www.bpb.de/themen/gesundheit/gesundheitspolitik/251840/wichtige-akteure-im-deutschen-gesundheitswesen-teil-2-selbstverwaltung-und-angegliederte-institutionen/ (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  50. Bundesärztekammer Deutschland. Integrierte Versorgung. Available online: https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/_old-files/downloads/91Grundsaetze.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  51. Somme, D. Integrated care in France. Dream or reality? Int. J. Integr. Care 2014, 14, e053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cuttler, D.; Sheiner, L. Managed Care and Growth of Medical Expenditures. Available online: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w6140/w6140.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  53. Gildmeister, S. Wettbewerb und Managed Care: Kritik der wirtschaftstheoretischen Grundlagen am Beispiel der USA. Jahrb. Für Krit. Med. 1998, 29, 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  54. Edgren, L. The meaning of integrated care: A sytem approach. Int. J. Care 2008, 8, e68. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoang, T.; Goetz, M.; Yano, E.M.; Rossman, B.; Anaya, H.D.; Knapp, H.; Korthuis, P.T.; Henry, R.; Bowman, C.; Gifford, A.L.; et al. The Impact of Integrated HIV Care on Patient Health Outcomes. Med. Care 2009, 47, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Martinez-Gonzales, N.; Berchtold, P.; Ullamn, K.; Busato, A.; Egger, M. Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: A meta-review. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2014, 26, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Handford, C.D.; Tynan, A.-M.; Rackal, J.M.; Glazier, R. Setting and organization of care for persons living with HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006, 2010, CD004348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Walley, A.Y.; Cheng, D.M.; Libman, H.; Nunes, D.; Horsburgh, C.R.; Saitz, R.; Samet, J.H. Recent drug use, homelessness and increased short-term mortality in HIV-infected persons with alcohol problems. AIDS 2008, 22, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mas, M.A.; Miralles, R.; Heras, C.; Ulldemolis, M.J.; Bonet, J.M.; Prat, N.; Isnard, M.; Pablo, S.; Rodoreda, S.; Verdaguer, J.; et al. Designing a Person-Centred Integrated Care Programme for People with Complex Chronic Conditions: A Case Study from Catalonia. Int. J. Integr. Care 2021, 21, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Institute for Advanced Studies Austria. SELFIE 2020, Workplace 2 Executive Summary. 2016. Available online: https://www.selfie2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/SELFIE_WP2_Executive-summary.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  61. Kasteridis, P.; Street, A.; Dolman, M.; Gallier, L.; Hudson, K.; Martin, J.; Wyer, I. Who would most benefit from improved integrated care? Implementing an analytical strategy in Sozth Somerset. Int. J. Integr. Care 2015, 15, e001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Silber, S. Argumente für die Integrierte Versorgung als Regelversorgung in der Kardiologie. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2006, 95 (Suppl. S2), II37–II40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Czypionka, T.; Kraus, M.; Reiss, M.; Segert, A. The Health Network Tennengau—The first population oriented integrated chronic care programme for persons with chronic conditions in Austria. Int. J. Integr. Care 2017, 17, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Riedl, R.; Robausch, M.; Berghold, A. Disease Management Program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, long-term results of the early and established program cohort: A population-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0279090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Disease Management Association of America. Definition of Disease Management. Available online: http://www.ehcca.com/presentations/dmconference3/fitzner_1d.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2022).
  66. Wagner, E.H. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000, 320, 569–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gaul, C.; Liesring-Latta Schäfer, B.; Fritsche, G.; Holle, D. Integrated multidisciplinary care of headache disorders: A narrative review. Cephalalgia 2016, 36, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bower, P. Better management of multimorbidity: A critical look at the ‘Ariadne principles’. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Taylor, S.J.; Candy, B.; Bryar, R.M.; Ramsay, J.; Vrijhoef, H.; Esmond, G.; Wedzicha, J.A.; Griffiths, C.J. Effectiveness of innovations in nurse led chronic disease management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review for evidence. BMJ 2005, 331, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Watson, S. HIV complex care and care coordination: The nurse’s role. HIV Nurs. 2018, 18, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gordillo, V.; Del Amo, J.; Soriano, V. Sociodemographic and psychological variables influencing adherence to anti-retroviral therapy. AIDS 2020, 13, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Halman, M.; Carusone, S.C.; Stranks, S.; Schaefer-McDaniel, N.; Stewart, A. Complex care needs of patients with late-stage HIV disease: A retrospective study. AIDS Care 2013, 26, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Howard, A.A.; Arnsten, J.H.; Lo, Y.; Vlahov, D.; Rich, J.D.; Schuman, P.; Stone, V.E.; Smith, D.K.; Schoenbaum, E. A prospective study of adherence and viral load in a large multi-center cohort of HIV-infected women. AIDS 2002, 16, 2175–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hendrickson, C.; Moolla, A.; Maskew, M.; Long, L.; Fox, M.P.; Sanneh, I.; Majuba, P.; Pascoe, S. “Even if you’re HIV-positive there’s life after if you take your medication”: Experiences of people on long-term ART in South Africa: A short report. AIDS Care 2019, 31, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nakalema, H.H.; Raja, S.S.; Morgan, R.O.; Lee m Gillespie, S.; Kekitiinwa, A. The effect of antiretroviral therapy guidline change on health outcomes among youth living with HIV in Uganda. AIDS Care 2021, 33, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Molina, P.E.; Simon, L.; Amedee, A.M.; Welsh, D.A.; Ferguson, T.F. Impact of Alcohol on HIV Disease Pathogenesis, Comorbidities and Aging: Integrating Preclinical and Clinical Findings. Alcohol Alcohol. 2018, 53, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Udeli, M.; Stockton, M.A.; Kulisewa, K.; Hosseinipour, M.C.; Gaynes, B.N.; Mphonda, S.M.; Mwagomba, B.M.; Mazenga, A.C.; Pence, B.W. Integrating depression management into HIV primary care in central Malawi: The implementation of a pilot capacity building program. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Spoorenberg, S.L.W.; Uittenbroek, R.J.; Krember, H.P.H.; Reijneveld, S.A.; Wynia, K. Advantages of person-centered and integrated Care. Int. J. Integr. Care 2016, 16, A226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kachakova, V.D.; Varleva, T.; Karaahmed, B. Integrated HIV Care—Good Practices from Bulgaria. Int. J. Integr. Care 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Murphy, D.A.; Marelich, W.D. Resiliency in young children whose mothers are living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care 2008, 20, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Chenneville, T.; Gabbidon, K.; Lynn, C.; Rodriguez, C. Psychological factors related to resilience and vulnerability among youth with HIV in an integrated care setting. AIDS Care 2018, 30, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Tique, J.A.; Howard, L.M.; Gaveta, S.; Sidat, M.; Rothman, R.L.; Vermund, S.H.; Ciampa, P.J. Measuring Health Literacy Among Adults with HIV Infection in Mozambique: Development and Validation of the HIV Literacy Test. AIDS Behav. 2016, 21, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. UNAIDS. Undetectable Is Untransmittable. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2018/july/undetectable-untransmittable (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  84. Satre, D.D.; Levine-Hall, T.; Sterling, S.A.; Young-Wolff, K.C.; Lam, J.O.; Alexeeff, S.; Hojilla, C.; Williams, A.; Justice, A.C.; Sterne, J.; et al. The relationship of smoking and unhealthy alcohol use to the HIV care continuum among people with HIV in an integrated health care system. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 219, 108481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Glaeske, G. Integrierte Versorgung in Deutschland—Rahmenbedingungen für Mehr Effektivität und Effizienz, Managed Care; Schattauer: Deutschland, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  86. Olley, B.O.; Ogunde, M.J.; Oso, P.O.; Ishola, A. HIV-related stigma and self-disclosure: The mediating and moderating role of anticipated discrimination among people living with HIV/AIDS in Akure Nigeria. AIDS Care 2016, 28, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Valentijn, P.P.; Boesveld, I.C.; Van der Klauw, D.M.; Ruwaard, D.; Struijs, J. Toward a taxonomy for integrated care: A mixed methods study. Int. J. Integr. Care 2015, 15, e003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Amelung, V.E.; Stein, V.; Goodwin, N.; Balicer, R.; Nolte, E.; Suter, E. Handbook Integrated Care. J. Integr. Care 2019, 19, 5. [Google Scholar]
  89. Cullen, W.; McCombe, G.; Almaazmi, B.; Lambert, J.S.; Avramovic, G.; Murphy, C.; O’Connor, M.; Perry, N.; Ianache, I.; Kosa, A.; et al. Integrating Primary and Secondary Care to Optimise Hepatitis C Treatment: Development and Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Educational ‘Masterclass’ Series. Int. J. Integr. Care 2018, 18, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cloete, A.; Simbayi, L.C.; Kalichman, S.C.; Strebel, A.; Henda, N. Sitgma and Discrimination experiences of HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Cape Town, South Africa. AIDS Care 2008, 20, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, L.; Wu, Z.; Liang, L.-J.; Lin, C.; Guan, J.; Jia, M.; Rou, K.; Yan, Z. Reducing HIV-Related Stigma in Health Care Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial in China. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stricker, S.; Fox, K.A.; Baggaley r Negussie, E.; De Pee, S.; Grede, N.; Bloem, M.N. Retention in Care and Adherence to ART are Critical Elements of HIV Care Interventions. AIDS Behav. 2013, 18, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ferlatte, O.; Handlovsky, I.; Ridge, D.; Chanady, T.; Knight, R.; Oliffe, J.L. Understanding stigma and suicidality among gay men living with HIV: A photovoice project. SSM-Qual. Res. Health 2022, 2, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Galani, M.; Hailey, D.M.; Tibben, W.; Letsholo, K.J. Improving continuity of HIV/AIDS care through electronic health records in resource-limited settings: A Botswana perspective. Health Policy Technol. 2021, 10, 100501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dávila, Y.; Castellanos, M.; García, M. National strategy of integrated care for tuberculosis and HIV co-infection in Mexico, progress in 2015/Estrategia nacional de atención integrada para la co infección Tuberculosis y VIH en México, avances al. Int. J. Integr. Care 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Gebreyesus, T.; Belay, A.; Berhe, G.; Haile, G. Burden of fatigue among adults living with HIV/AIDS attending antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Wouters, E.; Van Damme, W.; Van Loon f Van Rensburg, D.; Meulemans, H. Publlic-sector ART in the Free State province, South Africa: Community support as an important determinant of outcome. Soc. Sci. Med. 2009, 69, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Angwenyi, V.; Aantjes, C.; Kajumi, M.; De Man, J.; Criel, B.; Bunders-Aelen, J. Patients experiences of selb-management and strategies for dealing with chronic conditions in rural Malawi. Int. J. Integr. Care 2018, 18, A68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kaneko, N.; Shiono, S.; Hill, A.O.; Homma, T.; Iwahashi, K.; Tateyama, M.; Ichikawa, S. Correlates of lifetime and past one-year HIV-testing experience among men who have sex with men in Japan. AIDS Care 2020, 33, 1270–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Simeone, C.; Shapiro, B.; Lum, P.J. Integrated HIV care is associated with improved engagement in treatment in an urban methdadon clinic. Addicition Sci. Clin. Pract. 2017, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Barba, O.; Clusa, T.; Menacho, I.; Sequeira, E.; Moreno, L.; Gonzalez, E.; Freixa, X.; Cayuelas, L.; Muñoz, S.; Fernández, E.; et al. Shared Care Unit: A new model of coordinating HIV care between Primary Settings and Hospital. Int. J. Integr. Care 2016, 16, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lazarus, J.V.; Safreed-Harmon, K.; Gronborg Laut, K.; Peters, L.; Mocroft, A.; Kirk, O. People-centred health services at HIV clinics across Europe: Findings from the EuoSIDA clinic survey. Int. J. Integr. Care 2016, 16, A263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pham, V.A.; Nguyen, H.; Krakauer, E.L.; Harding, R. “I Wish I Could Die So I Would Not Be in Pain”: A Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Needs Among People with Cancer or HIV/AIDS in Vietnam and Their Caregivers. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2020, 62, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Islam, M.S.; Scott, J.; Minichiello, V. A qualitative exploration of parental experiences of stigma while living with HIV in Bangladesh. AIDS Care 2015, 28, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Lowther, K.; Harding, R.; Simms, V.; Gikaara, N.; Ahmed, A.; Alif, Z.; Kariuki, H.; Sherr, L.; Higginson, I.J.; Selman, L. Effect of participation in a randomized controlled trial of an integrated palliative care intervention on HIV-associated stigma. AIDS Care 2018, 30, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Thygesen, M.K. A complex integrated care intervention of support to patient’s self-efficacy—What is the active ingredient? Int. J. Integr. Care 2020, 21, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fiori, K.P.; Belli, H.M.; Lauria, M.E.; Hirschhorn, L.R.; Schechter, J.; Hansman, E.; Rajshekhar, M.; Katin, V.; Gbeleou, S.; Grunitsky-Bekele, M.; et al. Implementing an integrated community based health systems strengthening approach to improve HIV survival in Northern Togo. AIDS Care 2019, 32, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Tshililo, A.R.; Mangena-Netshikweta, L.; Nemathaga, L.H.; Malueke, M. Challenges of primary healthcare nurses regarding the integration of HIV and AIDS services into primary healthcare in Vhembe district of Limpopo province, South Africa. Curationis 2019, 42, e1–e6. Available online: http://www.curationis.org.za (accessed on 14 December 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Miller, R.; Luft, H.S. Managed Care Plan Performance Since Literature Analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994, 271, 1512–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Model of integrated care (own presentation; data from the (WHO) [33].
Figure 1. Model of integrated care (own presentation; data from the (WHO) [33].
Ijerph 20 03374 g001
Figure 2. Integrated care, disease management, case management (own presentation; data from Bower, 2014; Taylor, Candy, and Bryar, 2005) [68,69].
Figure 2. Integrated care, disease management, case management (own presentation; data from Bower, 2014; Taylor, Candy, and Bryar, 2005) [68,69].
Ijerph 20 03374 g002
Figure 3. General complexity of people with chronic diseases (own presentation).
Figure 3. General complexity of people with chronic diseases (own presentation).
Ijerph 20 03374 g003
Figure 4. Categories of HIV complexity (own presentation) (Watson, 2018 [70]).
Figure 4. Categories of HIV complexity (own presentation) (Watson, 2018 [70]).
Ijerph 20 03374 g004
Figure 5. Integrated care for PLWH modified population-based Kaiser Permanente model (WHO 2016 [33]).
Figure 5. Integrated care for PLWH modified population-based Kaiser Permanente model (WHO 2016 [33]).
Ijerph 20 03374 g005
Table 1. Overview of national and international integrated care programs (own presentation; data from Institute for Advanced Studies Austria 2016 [60]).
Table 1. Overview of national and international integrated care programs (own presentation; data from Institute for Advanced Studies Austria 2016 [60]).
AustriaHealth Network Tennengau
Sociomedical Center Liebenau
Disease management programme “Therapie aktiv—Diabetes im Griff“
CroatiaGeros
Palliative Care System
GermanyCasaplus
Gesundes Kinzitgal
HungaryOnko Network
Palliative Care Consult Service
The NetherlandsProactive Primary Care Approach for Frail Elderly
Care Chain Frail Elderly
Better Together in Amsterdam North
NorwayMedically Assisted Rehabilitation Bergen
Learning networks for whole, coordinated, and safe pathways
SpainBadalona Serveis Assitencials
Area Integral de Salut, Barcelona Esquerra
United KingdomSalford Integrated Care Programme/Salford Together
South Somerset Symphony Programme
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Beichler, H.; Grabovac, I.; Dorner, T.E. Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043374

AMA Style

Beichler H, Grabovac I, Dorner TE. Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beichler, Helmut, Igor Grabovac, and Thomas E. Dorner. 2023. "Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop