Next Article in Journal
CD44+ and CD133+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Exhibit DNA Damage Response Pathways and Dormant Polyploid Giant Cancer Cell Enrichment Relating to Their p53 Status
Next Article in Special Issue
A MLR-Based Approach to Analyze Regulators of T Lymphocyte Activation In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Hypocalcemic Vitamin D Analogs in the Expression of DNA Damage Induced in Minilungs from hESCs: Implications for Lung Fibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Neoantigens in Cancer Cells as Targets for Immunotherapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms23094920
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Targeting CD10 on B-Cell Leukemia Using the Universal CAR T-Cell Platform (UniCAR)

by
Nicola Mitwasi
1,
Claudia Arndt
1,2,
Liliana R. Loureiro
1,
Alexandra Kegler
1,
Frederick Fasslrinner
2,3,
Nicole Berndt
1,
Ralf Bergmann
1,4,
Vaclav Hořejší
5,
Claudia Rössig
6,
Michael Bachmann
1,7,8,9,* and
Anja Feldmann
1
1
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, D-01328 Dresden, Germany
2
Mildred Scheel Early Career Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
3
Medical Clinic and Polyclinic I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
4
Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, H-1094 Budapest, Hungary
5
Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
6
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children’s Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
7
National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), D-01307 Dresden, Germany
8
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
9
Tumor Immunology, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4920; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094920
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 20 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Immunotheragnostics: From Molecular Basis to Targeted Pharmaceutical Design)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing T-cells are without a doubt a breakthrough therapy for hematological malignancies. Despite their success, clinical experience has revealed several challenges, which include relapse after targeting single antigens such as CD19 in the case of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and the occurrence of side effects that could be severe in some cases. Therefore, it became clear that improved safety approaches, and targeting multiple antigens, should be considered to further improve CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL. In this paper, we address both issues by investigating the use of CD10 as a therapeutic target for B-ALL with our switchable UniCAR system. The UniCAR platform is a modular platform that depends on the presence of two elements to function. These include UniCAR T-cells and the target modules (TMs), which cross-link the T-cells to their respective targets on tumor cells. The TMs function as keys that control the switchability of UniCAR T-cells. Here, we demonstrate that UniCAR T-cells, armed with anti-CD10 TM, can efficiently kill B-ALL cell lines, as well as patient-derived B-ALL blasts, thereby highlighting the exciting possibility for using CD10 as an emerging therapeutic target for B-cell malignancies.

1. Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing T-cells have indeed shown a remarkable potential for the treatment of various B-cell related malignancies, which has led to the approval of several CAR T-cell products such as KymriahTM, YescartaTM and others [1,2,3]. However, clinical experience has shown that targeting single antigens, such as CD19, on leukemic cells can result in relapse with antigen-negative leukemic clones following the treatment [4,5,6]. Therefore, it became crucial to find additional targets, which are widely expressed in B-cell malignancies, in order to allow subsequent or combinational targeting of leukemic cells, and thereby avoid relapse. Another vital aspect that needs to be addressed in regards to CAR T-cell therapy, is the risk of developing severe side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome or neurological toxicities, which could be life threating [7,8,9].
In our paper, we tackled both issues by investigating the feasibility of targeting the common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen, also known as CD10, with our switchable UniCAR technology. CD10 is known to be a transmembrane metalloprotease that cleaves and inactivates a variety of functional neuro- and hormonal peptides [10,11]. It is present in common lymphoid progenitors and several stages of B-cell development [12,13,14]. CD10 is considered an interesting therapeutic target, due to its expression on a variety of B-cell malignancies, including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) [14,15]. In fact, CD10 was first identified as a common ALL antigen, due to the reaction of its anti-serum with the majority of non T-cell ALL cells [16]. Moreover, it was found to be expressed in lymphomas, such as Follicular lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma and others, which makes it a commonly used marker for the classification and differentiation of these various B-cell malignancies [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Interestingly, CD10 expression is not limited to hematological malignancies, and has also been shown to be overexpressed in several solid tumors, such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid carcinoma and others [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Furthermore, it has been found to be correlated with prognosis, tumor metastasis and aggressiveness [30,31,34,35,36,37]. Based on the aforementioned facts, CD10 represents a valuable tumor target, especially for immune-based therapies, such as CAR T-cells [38,39].
Since CD10 is also expressed in certain healthy tissues, like the kidneys, epithelial cells of the prostate, liver and others [10,11], targeting it with conventional CAR T-cells needs an improved safety approach, which could be achieved with our switchable UniCAR technology. The UniCAR system is a modular system composed of UniCAR T-cells that cannot recognize surface antigens unless a second soluble adaptor molecule—the target module (TM)—is present [40,41]. In general, TMs consist of a target-binding domain to which a peptide sequence is fused as an epitope tag. Commonly, we use, as a tag, the continuous peptide epitope E5B9, that is part of the primary sequence of the human nuclear protein La-SS/B [42,43]. As the extracellular antigen-binding domain of the UniCAR is derived from the anti-La monoclonal antibody (mAb) 5B9, it recognizes the E5B9 epitope of the respective TM. With its binding site, the TM binds to a tumor antigen. The resulting cross-linkage finally leads to the activation of UniCAR T-cells and, subsequently, to the elimination of tumor cells (Figure 1A). Steering of the UniCAR T-cell activity is based on the concentration and half-life of the TM, which is usually short in order to allow a fast on/off switch and thereby control unwanted side effects (Figure 1A). Previously, we have proven the efficiency of the UniCAR system in targeting a wide range of hematological and solid tumors, both in pre-clinical and clinical studies [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Here, we have designed and created a TM, based on a CD10 mAb, and provided proof of concept for the efficient targeting of a CD10-expressing B-ALL cell line, as well as patient-isolated ALL blasts using the UniCAR system.

2. Results

2.1. Expression and Purification of Anti-CD10 Target Modules

The sequences of the variable light and heavy domains (VL and VH) of an anti-CD10 mAb were determined by sequencing of amplified cDNA that was prepared from hybridoma cells MEM-78. The VH and VL domains were linked via flexible glycine-serine linkers. We fused the E5B9 epitope, followed by a hexa-histidine (6xHis) tag, C-terminally of the resulting single-chain fragment variable (scFv), to allow purification with Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. At the N-terminus, the signal peptide sequence of murine Igκ was added, in order to allow the secretion of the TM (Figure 1B).
Following purification of the TMs from the culture medium of transduced 3T3 cells, the eluted fractions were analyzed on SDS-PAGE and stained with Quick Coomassie® Stain (Figure 1C). Alternatively, the proteins were immunoblotted on a nitrocellulose membrane, and detected with a mouse anti-penta-His Ab (Figure 1D). The full-length TM was detected on the Coomassie-stained gel as well as on the Western blot. The theoretical size of the TM is around 30 kDa. However, it runs slightly higher on the SDS-PAGE gel, as shown in Figure 1C,D, which hints to a post-translational modification of the molecule, or aberrant mobility on the gel. Most importantly, the TM was successfully purified and could be used for further functional analysis.

2.2. The Novel Anti-CD10 Target Module Binds Effectively to B-ALL Cell Line

The ability of anti-CD10 TM to bind to the CD10-expressing B-ALL cell line (Nalm-6) was detected with anti-La mAb (clone 5B9) specific for the E5B9 tag in the TM. As shown in Figure 2, the TM was able to bind to all the Nalm-6 Luc cells, which were confirmed to express CD10 on their surface by staining with an anti-CD10 mAb (Figure 2, upper panel). In addition, we used the previously established anti-CD19 TM as a positive control for the binding [44]. The specificity of the anti-CD10 TM was confirmed on the CD10-negative cell line Molm-13 Luc, where no binding of the TM was detected (Figure 2, lower panel).

2.3. UniCAR T-Cells Armed with Anti-CD10 Target Module Exert Specific In Vitro Cytotoxicity against Leukemic Cell Line

In order to investigate the specific cytotoxic activity of armed UniCAR T-cells, they were incubated with the CD10-expressing cell line Nalm-6 Luc or the CD10-negative cell line Molm-13 Luc (Figure 2). As demonstrated in Figure 3A, the UniCAR T-cells (UniCAR 28/ζ) redirected with anti-CD10 TM caused specific and significant lysis of Nalm-6 Luc cells, whereas no significant lysis was observed with Molm-13 Luc cells that lack the targets CD10 and CD19. As a positive control, we included a previously established anti-CD19 TM [44], which resulted in a lysis of the target cells at a level comparable to the anti-CD10 TM.
In addition, the ability of UniCAR T-cells to target the Nalm-6 Luc cell line was evaluated at different effector to target cell ratios (E:T) in the presence, or absence, of the novel TM against CD10. As shown in Figure 3B, redirected UniCAR T-cells effectively, and significantly killed CD10-expressing Nalm-6 Luc cells in the presence of the anti-CD10 TM, even at low E:T ratios. The killing effect further increased with increasing E:T ratios. In contrast, no significant target cell lysis occurred in the absence of the TM. In this experiment, Vector control T-cells (lacking the UniCARs), or non-signaling UniCAR stop T-cells, were used as controls. As observed, these controls caused only a slight killing background when tested for the highest two E:T ratios, regardless of the presence, or absence, of the anti-CD10 TM (Figure 3B). In conclusion, UniCAR T-cells armed with anti-CD10 TM kill CD10-expressing leukemic cells in a target-specific manner.

2.4. Estimation of Effective Working Concentrations of Anti-CD10 Target Module

UniCAR T-cells kill tumor cells dependent on the concentration of the specific TM, which plays an important role in the efficacy and controllability of the UniCAR system. Here, we have tested the UniCAR T-cells with a range of TM concentrations in order to determine the functional window. A shown in Figure 4, the killing activity of UniCAR T-cells can be titrated according to the TM concentration. A nanomolar range of the TM is needed to activate UniCAR T-cells to kill Nalm-6 Luc cells. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) was estimated to be around 7 nM.

2.5. Redirected UniCAR T-Cells Release Cytokines upon Engaging with CD10-Expressing Leukemia Cells

Secretion of cytokines is another vital function of T-cells, which allows the regulation of other immune components that are involved in the anti-tumor response. Here, we have investigated the ability of UniCAR T-cells to release pro-inflammatory cytokines upon engaging with Nalm-6 Luc cells in the presence of anti-CD10 TM and anti-CD19 TM.
As shown in Figure 5, UniCAR T-cells are able to significantly increase the production of IFNγ, TNF and IL-2 upon engaging with leukemic cells via the anti-CD10 TM or the anti-CD19 TM; although a higher cytokine release was induced by the latter. As a proof of specificity, the same conditions were applied on a CD10-negative cell line (Molm-13 Luc) in which no significant increase of cytokines was observed. In addition, no, or only marginal, cytokine levels were detected in the control settings in which UniCAR T-cells were co-cultured together with targets cells without TMs, or in combination with the TM but in the absence of target cells.
In addition, we have analyzed a panel of cytokines, including GM-CSF, IFN-α, IFNγ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A and TNF-α, using bead-based technology (MACSPlex assay). We could detect GM-CSF, IFNγ, TNF-α and IL-2 in a comparable level to conventional Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). However, all other cytokines were undetectable or secreted at very low levels. A selection of cytokines is shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

2.6. Killing of Patient-Derived ALL Blasts with Armed UniCAR T-Cells

Envisioning clinical translation, we aimed to create more resemblance to natural disease conditions. Therefore, we tested our armed UniCAR T-cells with patient-derived B-ALL blasts, which are characterized by expression of CD10 and CD19 antigens (Figure 6A).
The cytotoxic effect was measured after 24 and 48 h of co-incubation of UniCAR T-cells and the blasts, in the absence or presence of anti-CD10/CD19 TMs, using a flow cytometry-based assay. Due to the modular feature of the UniCAR system, a dual targeting strategy can be applied, where both antigens (CD10 and CD19) can be targeted at the same time by simply applying a combination of both anti-CD10 and anti-CD19 TMs.
As shown in Figure 6B, UniCAR T-cells armed with anti-CD10 TM led to an increase in the specific lysis of the blasts at 24 h with a further increase at 48 h. Some background lysis could be observed in the absence of TM, which could be attributed to the allogenicity between UniCAR T-cells and B-ALL blasts. Both anti-CD10 and anti-CD19 TMs showed comparable potencies. Moreover, combining both TMs did not show a further increase of blasts lysis. In summary, both antigens CD10 and CD19 could be targeted using the same UniCAR T-cells, leading to an increase in the specific lysis of patient-derived leukemic blasts.

3. Discussion

The emergence of immune-based therapeutic strategies has started revolutionizing the treatment of cancer. While targeting of solid tumors still faces several hurdles [53,54,55], CAR T-cell targeting CD19 in leukemia and lymphoma has found its way into clinical application, due to high success rates achieved with the therapy [56,57]. However, the clinical use of CAR T-cells has also revealed several drawbacks that need to be addressed in order to optimize their therapeutic use. CD19-specific CAR T-cells can lead to depletion of healthy B-cells and consequently, acquired hypogammaglobulinemia as a result of the on-target/off-tumor effect and the persistent activity of CAR T-cells [58]. In addition, life-threatening toxicities could occur and jeopardize the health of patients [58]. Therefore, there has been a need for improved safety approaches that can provide controllability of the engineered T-cells. Indeed, this has been shown with our switchable UniCAR system, not only in pre-clinical settings but also in a recent phase-1 clinical study [45,49].
Some of the ALL patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells had partial responses, resistance or even relapse [59]. Targeting single antigens (e.g., CD19) can be associated with the emergence of either altered forms of the target antigen or completely antigen-negative leukemic clones, leading to ineffectiveness of the treatment [4,60]. Therefore, other targets, such as CD20 or CD22, are being investigated to allow subsequent or co-targeting of leukemic cells [61,62,63,64]. In this study, we investigated the targeting of CD10, a common ALL antigen, which is expressed in several types of leukemia and lymphoma. Despite the wide use of CD10 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in B-cells and other malignancies [14,19,29,37,65], its potential as a target for immunotherapy is understudied.
We have previously described in detail the successful targeting of CD19 on B-ALL cell lines using switchable UniCAR technology [44]. In this study, we describe the design and characterization of a novel anti-CD10 TM, which is based on an anti-CD10 mAb. Although the novel TM is monovalent, it was shown to keep its binding ability to CD10-expressing cells. We have also demonstrated that the TM-armed UniCAR T-cells can induce specific and significant lysis of B-ALL cell lines. In fact, a nanomolar concentration of the TM was sufficient to activate the UniCAR T-cells to exert a cytotoxic effect and to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines.
We also compared the anti-CD10 TM with our previously-established anti-CD19 TM. As observed, the maximum cytotoxic effect of UniCAR T-cells, armed with anti-CD10 TM, was comparable to that of anti-CD19 TM, but with a higher secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by the latter. Combining both TMs simultaneously did not appear to further enhance the maximum lysis of primary ALL blasts under the applied conditions. This was actually expected, since the majority of blasts expressed CD10 and CD19 and could already be effectively eliminated upon monospecific targeting. However, we have shown that the same UniCAR T-cells can be efficiently redirected with either anti-CD10 and/or anti-CD19 TMs, which might be helpful to overcome tumor escape variants and tumor heterogeneity, enabling an overall enhanced anti-tumor effect in patients.
In summary, efficient elimination of B-ALL cells can be achieved by targeting CD10 using UniCAR technology. Importantly, the modular nature of the UniCAR system provides the ability to switch the UniCAR T-cells on and off, and thereby it allows the sparing of healthy B-cells after termination of the treatment, and also aids in reducing the risk of toxicities, while granting the flexibility to target several antigens on B-ALL cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

Nalm-6 cells and Molm-13 were purchased from DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany), and cultured in RMPI medium containing 10% FCS in addition to 100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1% non-essential amino acids and 2 mM N-acetyl-L-alanyl-L-glutamine (Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). The cells were used without further authentication. Nalm-6 cells and Molm-13 cells were transduced to express the firefly luciferase (Photinus pyralis) using a lentiviral vector, resulting in Nalm-6 Luc and Molm-13 Luc, as described previously [50]. TM-producing 3T3 cell lines were cultured in DMEM medium, containing 10% FCS, 100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 1% non-essential amino acids (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were kept at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and passaged twice per week.
Patient-derived frozen bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs) were quickly thawed and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in RPMI 1640 medium, containing 5% FCS, 2500 U/mL Heparin (Biochrom GmbH) and 2000 U/mL DNAse (Sigma Aldrich). Afterwards, the cells were cultured in StemSpanTM medium (STEMCELL Technologies GmbH, Cologne, Germany), containing 2% FCS, 100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM N-acetyl-L-alanyl-L-glutamine, and supplemented with 10 ng/mL of fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3-L), 10 ng/mL stem cell factor (SCF), 10 ng/mL thrombopoietin (TPO) and 10 ng/mL interleukin-3 (IL-3).

4.2. Expression and Purification of Recombinant Anti-CD10 Target Modules

For the construction of CD10 TMs, the VH and VL domains sequences of anti-CD10 mAb clone MEM-78 were used. To determine the sequences of the variable domains, cDNA of MEM-78 hybridoma cells was amplified with Advantage_HF2 PCR Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA), with the forward primer (5′-TTTTTGGATCCSARGTNMAGCTGSAGSAGTCWGG-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-GGAAGATCTATAGACAGATGGGGGTGTCGT-3′) for the detection of the VH domain, and the primers set: (Forward: 5′-TGGAYTYCAGCCTCCAGA-3′) and (Reverse: 5′-CGACTAGTCGACTGGTGGGAAGATGGATACAG-3′) for the VL domain. The amplified sequences were then cloned into the plasmid pGEM®-T Easy, as described by the manufacturer (Promega GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Afterwards, the inserts were sequenced (Microsynth Seqlab GmbH, Goettingen, Germany).
The anti-CD10 TM was designed by joining the VH and VL domains via glycine-serine peptide linkers. In addition, we fused the E5B9 and the 6xHis tag at the C-terminus. This in-silico designed nucleotide sequence was then synthesized by Eurofins Genomics GmbH (Ebersberg, Germany). The synthesized sequence was inserted into the lentiviral vector p6NST50 via the restriction enzymes NheI/MssI (insert digestion) and XbaI/HpaI (vector digestion) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany). The anti-CD10 TM was expressed in 3T3 cells, which were generated by transduction with lentiviral particles encoding the TM sequence. Afterwards, the supernatants of transduced 3T3 cells were collected, and the TMs were purified with Ni-NTA affinity columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) through the C-terminal 6xHis tag, followed by analysis with SDS-PAGE, staining with Quick Coomassie® Stain (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) or immunoblotting, as described previously [49,50].

4.3. Isolation and Genetic Modification of T-Cells

T-cells were isolated from buffy coats that were obtained from the German Red Cross (Dresden, Germany) with the informed consent of voluntary healthy donors. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated via density gradient centrifugation. Subsequently, the T-cells were magnetically labeled and separated using the Pan T Cell Isolation Kit and autoMACS® Pro Separator (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The detailed design and generation of the genetically modified UniCAR T-cells and the control T-cells (Vector and UniCAR stop control) were described in detail previously [49,51,52]. During transduction and expansion, T-cells were cultured with IL-15, IL-7 (ImmunoTools, Friesoythe, Germany) and Proleukin® (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland). However, around 24 h before the assays, genetically modified T-cells were cultured in RPMI complete medium without the cytokines.

4.4. Cytokine-Release Assay

The detection of cytokines IFNγ, TNF, IL-2 was performed on cell-free supernatants from a co-culture of 1 × 104 Nalm-6 cells with 5 × 104 UniCAR T-cells in the presence, or absence, of 50 nM of either anti-CD10 or anti-CD19 TM in a total volume of 200 µL medium. The cytokine detection was performed using ELISA (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A standard curve, ranging from 7.8 to 500 pg/mL, was used in order to quantify each cytokine. Samples were diluted to make sure they fall below the maximum of the standard curve.
Alternatively, a panel of cytokines were measured in the supernatants using MACSPlex cytokine 12 kit (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and were analyzed using a MACSQuant® Analyzer and MACSQuantify® software (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH). A standard curve, ranging from 3.2 to 10,000 pg/mL, was used in order to quantify the cytokines.

4.5. Flow Cytometry Analysis

In order to detect binding of the anti-CD10 TM to CD10 extracellular domain, 1 × 105 Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc cells were first incubated with 5 µL of FcR blocking Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH), and then stained with anti-CD10 TM (2 µg/50 µL PBS/2% FCS) for 1 h. Thereafter, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with the anti-La mAb (clone 5B9), directed against the E5B9 epitope (50 µL of 5 µg/mL, 1 h). This was followed by washing with PBS and 30 min incubation with Alexa Fluor 647-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG Ab (Life Technologies, ThermoFisher Scientific). Binding of anti-CD19 TM was performed as described above. For detection of CD10 and CD19 on the cell lines or on the patient-derived B-ALL blasts, 1 × 105 cells were stained with VioBlue-conjugated anti-human CD10 or CD19 REAfinityTM mAbs or isotype control (REA Control Antibody (S), human IgG1, VioBlue®, REAfinityTM, 1 µL Ab/30 µL PBS/2% FCS, 30 min) (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH). Finally, samples were analyzed using a MACSQuant® Analyzer, MACSQuantify® software (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH) and FlowJoTM Software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA). All stainings were confirmed at least twice.

4.6. Cytotoxicity Assays

For luminescence-based cytotoxicity assay, cancer cells expressing the firefly luciferase were used. UniCAR T-cells were co-cultured for 7 h with Molm-13 Luc or Nalm-6 Luc, at different E:T ratios in the absence, or presence, of 50 nM, or a range of concentrations of the TM as indicated for each experiment. The protocol for determination and calculation of specific lysis of tumor cells was described previously in detail [47].
A flow cytometry-based cytotoxicity assay was used for the detection of the viability of patient-derived B-ALL blasts. Therefore, the blasts were labeled with eBioscienceTM cell proliferation dye eFluorTM 670 (Thermofisher Scientific). After 24 and 48 h of co-culture with UniCAR T-cells and 50 nM of the TMs, the viable eFluor-labeled blasts were identified by adding 1 μg/mL of propidium iodide/PBS solution (ThermoFisher Scientific), and analyzed with MACSQuant® Analyzer and MACSQuantify® software (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH). The percentage of living cells was calculated using the following equation: (cell count/mL (sample)/cell count/mL (maximum)) ×100%, where the maximum is the cell count in the wells containing only leukemic cells without the addition of UniCAR T-cells or TM. Then, the percentage of lysis was calculated as follow: 100%-living cells%.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft World Excel 2017 and GraphPad Prism 9.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison. P-values below 0.033 were considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23094920/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and A.F.; methodology, M.B., A.F. and N.M.; formal analysis, N.M. and A.F.; investigation and experiments performance, N.M., A.F., C.A., L.R.L., A.K., N.B. and R.B.; resources, M.B., C.R., V.H. and F.F.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M. and A.F.; writing—review and editing, M.B., A.F., N.M., C.A., L.R.L., A.K., F.F., C.R., V.H., N.B. and R.B.; visualization, N.M. and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Helmholtz Initiative and Networking Fund (Radio-Immunotheranostics (MHELTHERA), project ID: InterLabs-0031) granted to M.B.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Patients whose samples were used in this study were treated within the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group multicenter trial AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2009. The study was approved by the University of Münster Ethical Board, and informed consent was obtained from patients and/or their legal guardians in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The research with human T-cells was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany (EK138042014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from donors, patients and/or their legal guardians in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Both patients (used in this study) have given consent to the use of leftover material for research purposes within the AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2009 study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Julia Lagler and Annegret Riedel for their excellent technical support. We would also like to thank Heidi Altmann from BioBank Dresden for her support. C.A. and F.F. are fellows of the Mildred Scheel Early Career Center Dresden P2 funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Han, W.; Zhang, Y. Tisagenlecleucel, an Approved Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Leukemia. Drugs Today 2017, 53, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Elsallab, M.; Levine, B.L.; Wayne, A.S.; Abou-El-Enein, M. CAR T-Cell Product Performance in Haematological Malignancies before and after Marketing Authorisation. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, e104–e116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sengsayadeth, S.; Savani, B.N.; Oluwole, O.; Dholaria, B. Overview of Approved CAR-T Therapies, Ongoing Clinical Trials, and Its Impact on Clinical Practice. eJHaem 2022, 3, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mejstríková, E.; Hrusak, O.; Borowitz, M.J.; Whitlock, J.A.; Brethon, B.; Trippett, T.M.; Zugmaier, G.; Gore, L.; Von Stackelberg, A.; Locatelli, F. CD19-Negative Relapse of Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Following Blinatumomab Treatment. Blood Cancer J. 2017, 7, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fousek, K.; Watanabe, J.; Joseph, S.K.; George, A.; An, X.; Byrd, T.T.; Morris, J.S.; Luong, A.; Martínez-Paniagua, M.A.; Sanber, K.; et al. CAR T-Cells That Target Acute B-Lineage Leukemia Irrespective of CD19 Expression. Leukemia 2020, 35, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ghodke, K.; Bibi, A.; Rabade, N.; Patkar, N.; Subramanian, P.G.; Kadam, P.A.; Badrinath, Y.; Ghogale, S.; Gujral, S.; Tembhare, P. CD19 Negative Precursor B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)—Immunophenotypic Challenges in Diagnosis and Monitoring: A Study of Three Cases. Cytom. Part B Clin. Cytom. 2017, 92, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rivera, A.M.; May, S.; Lei, M.; Qualls, S.; Bushey, K.; Rubin, D.B.; Barra, M.E. CAR T-Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity: Current Management and Emerging Treatment Strategies. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 2020, 43, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, P.P.; Kros, J.M.; Li, J. Approved CAR T Cell Therapies: Ice Bucket Challenges on Glaring Safety Risks and Long-Term Impacts. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cai, C.; Tang, D.; Han, Y.; Shen, E.; Ahmed, O.A.; Guo, C.; Shen, H.; Zeng, S. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Fatal Toxic Effects Associated with CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy. Aging 2020, 12, 18741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maguer-Satta, V.; Besançon, R.; Bachelard-Cascales, E. Concise Review: Neutral Endopeptidase (CD10): A Multifaceted Environment Actor in Stem Cells, Physiological Mechanisms, and Cancer. Stem Cells 2011, 29, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nalivaeva, N.N.; Zhuravin, I.A.; Turner, A.J. Neprilysin Expression and Functions in Development, Ageing and Disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2020, 192, 111363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Blom, B.; Spits, H. Development of human lymphoid cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 24, 287–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wentink, M.W.J.; Kalina, T.; Perez-Andres, M.; del Pino Molina, L.; IJspeert, H.; Kavelaars, F.G.; Lankester, A.C.; Lecrevisse, Q.; van Dongen, J.J.M.; Orfao, A.; et al. Delineating Human B Cell Precursor Development with Genetically Identified PID Cases as a Model. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mishra, D.; Singh, S.; Narayan, G. Role of B Cell Development Marker CD10 in Cancer Progression and Prognosis. Mol. Biol. Int. 2016, 2016, 4328697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sȩdek, L.; Bulsa, J.; Sonsala, A.; Twardoch, M.; Wieczorek, M.; Malinowska, I.; Derwich, K.; Niedźwiecki, M.; Sobol-Milejska, G.; Kowalczyk, J.R.; et al. The Immunophenotypes of Blast Cells in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How Different Are They from Their Normal Counterparts? Cytom. Part B Clin. Cytom. 2014, 86, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ritz, J.; Pesando, J.M.; Notis-McConarty, J.; Lazarus, H.; Schlossman, S.F. A Monoclonal Antibody to Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Antigen. Nature 1980, 283, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Uherova, P.; Ross, C.W.; Schnitzer, B.; Singleton, T.P.; Finn, W.G. The Clinical Significance of CD10 Antigen Expression in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2001, 115, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Almasri, N.M.; Iturraspe, J.A.; Braylan, R.C. CD10 Expression in Follicular Lymphoma and Large Cell Lymphoma Is Different from That of Reactive Lymph Node Follicles. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1998, 122, 539–544. [Google Scholar]
  19. Craig, F.E.; Foon, K.A. Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping for Hematologic Neoplasms. Blood 2008, 111, 3941–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, A.; Rymkiewicz, G.; Sokół, K.; Paszkiewicz-Kozik, E.; Borysiuk, A.; Poleszczuk, J.; Bachnio, K.; Bystydzienski, Z.; Woroniecka, R.; Grygalewicz, B.; et al. Significance of CD10 Protein Expression in the Diagnostics of Follicular Lymphoma: A Comparison of Conventional Immunohistochemistry with Flow Cytometry Supported by the Establishment of BCL2 and BCL6 Rearrangements. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2020, 42, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdulbaki, R.; Tizro, P.; Nava, V.E.; da Silva, M.G.; Ascensão, J.L. Low-Grade Primary Splenic CD10-Positive Small B-Cell Lymphoma/Follicular Lymphoma. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 4821–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.Y.; Zu, Y. Diagnostic Algorithm of Common Mature B-Cell Lymphomas by Immunohistochemistry. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ziemba, Y.; Brody, J.; Hsu, P.; Reddy, K. Potential Prognostic Significance of Aberrant CD10 Positivity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2018, 150 (Suppl. 1), S109–S110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chung, J.; Shevchenko, A.; Lee, J.B. Evolution of a Melanoma in Situ to a Sarcomatoid Dedifferentiated Melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2021, 48, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fukusumi, T.; Ishii, H.; Konno, M.; Yasui, T.; Nakahara, S.; Takenaka, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nishikawa, S.; Kano, Y.; Ogawa, H.; et al. CD10 as a Novel Marker of Therapeutic Resistance and Cancer Stem Cells in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dall’Era, M.A.; True, L.D.; Siegel, A.F.; Porter, M.P.; Sherertz, T.M.; Liu, A.Y. Differential Expression of CD10 in Prostate Cancer and Its Clinical Implication. BMC Urol. 2007, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kanitakis, J.; Narvaez, D.; Claudy, A. Differential Expression of the CD10 Antigen (Neutral Endopeptidase) in Primary versus Metastatic Malignant Melanomas of the Skin. Melanoma Res. 2002, 12, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jang, T.J.; Park, J.B.; Lee, J.I. The Expression of CD10 and CD15 Is Progressively Increased during Colorectal Cancer Development. Korean J. Pathol. 2013, 47, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Żurawski, J.; Talarska, P.; de Mezer, M.; Kaszkowiak, K.; Chalcarz, M.; Iwanik, K.; Karoń, J.; Krokowicz, P. Evaluation of CD10 Expression as a Diagnostic Marker for Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2022, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Louhichi, T.; Saad, H.; Dhiab, M.B.; Ziadi, S.; Trimeche, M. Stromal CD10 Expression in Breast Cancer Correlates with Tumor Invasion and Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumagai-Togashi, A.; Uozaki, H.; Kikuchi, Y.; Watabe, S.; Numakura, S.; Watanabe, M. Tumorous CD10 Is More Strongly Related to the Progression of Urothelial Carcinoma than Stromal CD10. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gülhan, Ö.; Mahi, B. The Role of AMACR, CD10, TMPRSS2-ERG, and P27 Protein Expression Among Different Gleason Grades of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2020, 14, 1179554920947322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gabal, S.M.; Salem, M.M.; Mostafa, R.R.; Abdelsalam, S.M. Role of CD10 Marker in Differentiating Malignant Thyroid Neoplasms from Benign Thyroid Lesions (Immunohistochemical & Histopathological Study). Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Makretsov, N.A.; Hayes, M.; Carter, B.A.; Dabiri, S.; Gilks, C.B.; Huntsman, D.G. Stromal CD10 Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Correlates with Poor Prognosis, Estrogen Receptor Negativity, and High Grade. Mod. Pathol. 2007, 20, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Huang, W.-B.; Zhou, X.-J.; Chen, J.-Y.; Zhang, L.-H.; Meng, K.; Ma, H.-H.; Lu, Z.-F. CD10-Positive Stromal Cells in Gastric Carcinoma: Correlation with Invasion and Metastasis. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 35, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Su, S.; Chen, J.; Yao, H.; Liu, J.; Yu, S.; Lao, L.; Wang, M.; Luo, M.; Xing, Y.; Chen, F.; et al. CD10+GPR77+ Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote Cancer Formation and Chemoresistance by Sustaining Cancer Stemness. Cell 2018, 172, 841–856.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oh, E.J.; Bychkov, A.; Cho, H.; Kim, T.M.; Bae, J.S.; Lim, D.J.; Jung, C.K. Prognostic Implications of CD10 and CD15 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mizutani, N.; Abe, M.; Kajino, K.; Matsuoka, S. A New CD10 Antibody Inhibits the Growth of Malignant Mesothelioma. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2021, 40, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ruiz-Arguelles, G.J.; Ruiz-Arguelles, A.; Lobato-Mendizabal, E.; Presno-Bernal, M.; Alvarez-Amaya, C. Infusion of Anti-CD10 Monoclonal Antibody (J5) Following Ablative Chemotherapy in a Patient with Refractory Pre-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Rev. Investig. Clin. 1991, 43, 259–263. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bachmann, M. The UniCAR System: A Modular CAR T Cell Approach to Improve the Safety of CAR T Cells. Immunol. Lett. 2019, 211, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Feldmann, A.; Arndt, C.; Koristka, S.; Berndt, N.; Bergmann, R.; Bachmann, M.P. Conventional CARs versus Modular CARs. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2019, 68, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Koristka, S.; Cartellieri, M.; Feldmann, A.; Arndt, C.; Loff, S.; Michalk, I.; Aliperta, R.; von Bonin, M.; Bornhäuser, M.; Ehninger, A.; et al. Flexible Antigen-Specific Redirection of Human Regulatory T Cells Via a Novel Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptor System. Blood 2014, 124, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Carmo-Fonseca, M.; Pfeifer, K.; Schröder, H.C.; Vaz, M.F.; Fonseca, J.E.; Müller, W.E.G.; Bachmann, M. Identification of La Ribonucleoproteins as a Component of Interchromatin Granules. Exp. Cell Res. 1989, 185, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bachmann, D.; Aliperta, R.; Bergmann, R.; Feldmann, A.; Koristka, S.; Arndt, C.; Loff, S.; Welzel, P.; Albert, S.; Kegler, A.; et al. Retargeting of UniCAR T Cells with an In Vivo Synthesized Target Module Directed against CD19 Positive Tumor Cells. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 7487–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wermke, M.; Kraus, S.; Ehninger, A.; Bargou, R.C.; Goebeler, M.E.; Middeke, J.M.; Kreissig, C.; von Bonin, M.; Koedam, J.; Pehl, M.; et al. Proof of Concept for a Rapidly Switchable Universal CAR-T Platform with UniCAR-T-CD123 in Relapsed/Refractory AML. Blood 2021, 137, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Feldmann, A.; Arndt, C.; Bergmann, R.; Loff, S.; Cartellieri, M.; Bachmann, D.; Aliperta, R.; Hetzenecker, M.; Ludwig, F.; Albert, S.; et al. Retargeting of T Lymphocytes to PSCA- or PSMA Positive Prostate Cancer Cells Using the Novel Modular Chimeric Antigen Receptor Platform Technology “UniCAR”. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 31368–31385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mitwasi, N.; Feldmann, A.; Bergmann, R.; Berndt, N.; Arndt, C.; Koristka, S.; Kegler, A.; Jureczek, J.; Hoffmann, A.; Ehninger, A.; et al. Development of Novel Target Modules for Retargeting of UniCAR T Cells to GD2 Positive Tumor Cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 108584–108603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Albert, S.; Arndt, C.; Feldmann, A.; Bergmann, R.; Bachmann, D.; Koristka, S.; Ludwig, F.; Ziller-Walter, P.; Kegler, A.; Gärtner, S.; et al. A Novel Nanobody-Based Target Module for Retargeting of T Lymphocytes to EGFR-Expressing Cancer Cells via the Modular UniCAR Platform. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1287246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cartellieri, M.; Feldmann, A.; Koristka, S.; Arndt, C.; Loff, S.; Ehninger, A.; von Bonin, M.; Bejestani, E.P.; Ehninger, G.; Bachmann, M.P. Switching CAR T Cells on and off: A Novel Modular Platform for Retargeting of T Cells to AML Blasts. Blood Cancer J. 2016, 6, e458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Feldmann, A.; Arndt, C.; Töpfer, K.; Stamova, S.; Krone, F.; Cartellieri, M.; Koristka, S.; Michalk, I.; Lindemann, D.; Schmitz, M.; et al. Novel Humanized and Highly Efficient Bispecific Antibodies Mediate Killing of Prostate Stem Cell Antigen-Expressing Tumor Cells by CD8+ and CD4+ T Cells. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3249–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cartellieri, M.; Koristka, S.; Arndt, C.; Feldmann, A.; Stamova, S.; Von Bonin, M.; Töpfer, K.; Krüger, T.; Geib, M.; Michalk, I.; et al. A Novel Ex Vivo Isolation and Expansion Procedure for Chimeric Antigen Receptor Engrafted Human T Cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Arndt, C.; Loureiro, L.R.; Feldmann, A.; Jureczek, J.; Bergmann, R.; Máthé, D.; Hegedüs, N.; Berndt, N.; Koristka, S.; Mitwasi, N.; et al. UniCAR T Cell Immunotherapy Enables Efficient Elimination of Radioresistant Cancer Cells. Oncoimmunology 2020, 9, 1743036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. D’Aloia, M.M.; Zizzari, I.G.; Sacchetti, B.; Pierelli, L.; Alimandi, M. CAR-T Cells: The Long and Winding Road to Solid Tumors Review-Article. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hou, A.J.; Chen, L.C.; Chen, Y.Y. Navigating CAR-T Cells through the Solid-Tumour Microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 531–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marofi, F.; Motavalli, R.; Safonov, V.A.; Thangavelu, L.; Yumashev, A.V.; Alexander, M.; Shomali, N.; Chartrand, M.S.; Pathak, Y.; Jarahian, M.; et al. CAR T Cells in Solid Tumors: Challenges and Opportunities. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Ma, Q.; Yang, H.; Signorovitch, J.; Wu, E. A Review of Two Regulatory Approved Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Why Are Indirect Treatment Comparisons Not Feasible? Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 3040–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Maus, M.V. CD19 CAR T Cells for Adults wit h Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Lancet 2021, 398, 466–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bonifant, C.L.; Jackson, H.J.; Brentjens, R.J.; Curran, K.J. Toxicity and Management in CAR T-Cell Therapy. Mol. Ther.-Oncolytics 2016, 3, 16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Song, M.K.; Park, B.B.; Uhm, J.E. Resistance Mechanisms to CAR T-Cell Therapy and Overcoming Strategy in B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Xu, X.; Sun, Q.; Liang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, M.; Tu, H.; Liu, Y.; Tu, S.; et al. Mechanisms of Relapse After CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Prevention and Treatment Strategies. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Liang, A.; Ye, S.; Li, P.; Huang, J.; Zhu, S.; Yao, X.; Zhou, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) Patients after Failing CD19 CAR-T Therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Spiegel, J.Y.; Patel, S.; Muffly, L.; Hossain, N.M.; Oak, J.; Baird, J.H.; Frank, M.J.; Shiraz, P.; Sahaf, B.; Craig, J.; et al. CAR T Cells with Dual Targeting of CD19 and CD22 in Adult Patients with Recurrent or Refractory B Cell Malignancies: A Phase 1 Trial. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhou, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ou, X.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X. The Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19/CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor- T Cells Immunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Fry, T.J.; Shah, N.N.; Orentas, R.J.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Yuan, C.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Wolters, P.; Martin, S.; Delbrook, C.; Yates, B.; et al. CD22-Targeted CAR T Cells Induce Remission in B-ALL That Is Naive or Resistant to CD19-Targeted CAR Immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Jana, S.H.; Jha, B.M.; Patel, C.; Jana, D.; Agarwal, A. CD10-A New Prognostic Stromal Marker in Breast Carcinoma, Its Utility, Limitations and Role in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2014, 57, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 04920 g001 550
Figure 1. Design and expression of anti-CD10 target module. (A) Schematic representation of the UniCAR system; UniCAR T-cells can only be activated in the presence of the target module (TM) and their target cell (On). In the absence of the TM, the UniCAR T-cells are switched off (Off). (B) The anti-CD10 TM was obtained by joining the variable light and heavy (VL, VH) chain domains of CD10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) via peptide linkers followed by fusion of the E5B9 epitope and a hexa-histidine (6xHis) tag. (C) The purified TM was analyzed by SDS-PAGE along with bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard, followed by Quick Coomassie® Stain. (D) Alternatively, the separated proteins were blotted on nitrocellulose membrane and detected with mouse anti-penta-His Ab and the reaction of the alkaline phosphatase-conjugated to secondary anti-mouse IgG Ab. W1, W2: washes of Ni-NTA columns after purification; S: sample elution (anti-CD10 TM), MW: Molecular weight marker, Li: Linker, SP: Igκ signal peptide.
Figure 1. Design and expression of anti-CD10 target module. (A) Schematic representation of the UniCAR system; UniCAR T-cells can only be activated in the presence of the target module (TM) and their target cell (On). In the absence of the TM, the UniCAR T-cells are switched off (Off). (B) The anti-CD10 TM was obtained by joining the variable light and heavy (VL, VH) chain domains of CD10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) via peptide linkers followed by fusion of the E5B9 epitope and a hexa-histidine (6xHis) tag. (C) The purified TM was analyzed by SDS-PAGE along with bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard, followed by Quick Coomassie® Stain. (D) Alternatively, the separated proteins were blotted on nitrocellulose membrane and detected with mouse anti-penta-His Ab and the reaction of the alkaline phosphatase-conjugated to secondary anti-mouse IgG Ab. W1, W2: washes of Ni-NTA columns after purification; S: sample elution (anti-CD10 TM), MW: Molecular weight marker, Li: Linker, SP: Igκ signal peptide.
Ijms 23 04920 g001
Ijms 23 04920 g002 550
Figure 2. Binding of the novel anti-CD10 TM to Nalm-6 cells. Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc cells were stained with either VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD10 mAb, anti-CD10 TM, VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD19 mAb or anti-CD19 TM. The binding of the TMs was then detected using anti-La mAb (clone 5B9) followed by anti-mouse-IgG-Alexa Fluor 647. Binding is represented by a shift in the signal (dark gray). As a negative control, cells were stained with either VioBlue-conjugated isotype control or with anti-La mAb and the detection Ab without the TM (light gray). Binding is indicated as a percentage (%) of positively stained cells.
Figure 2. Binding of the novel anti-CD10 TM to Nalm-6 cells. Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc cells were stained with either VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD10 mAb, anti-CD10 TM, VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD19 mAb or anti-CD19 TM. The binding of the TMs was then detected using anti-La mAb (clone 5B9) followed by anti-mouse-IgG-Alexa Fluor 647. Binding is represented by a shift in the signal (dark gray). As a negative control, cells were stained with either VioBlue-conjugated isotype control or with anti-La mAb and the detection Ab without the TM (light gray). Binding is indicated as a percentage (%) of positively stained cells.
Ijms 23 04920 g002
Ijms 23 04920 g003 550
Figure 3. Targeting Nalm-6 Luc cells with UniCAR T-cells armed with anti-CD10 TM. (A) Either Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc cells were incubated with UniCAR T-cells in the addition of 50 nM anti-CD10 or anti-CD19 TM at 5:1 effector to target cell (E:T) ratio (** p < 0.0021, comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). (B) Nalm-6 Luc cells were incubated with different ratios of UniCAR T-cells for 7 h in the absence, or presence, of 50 nM of the anti-CD10 TM. The Vector control (expressing EGFP only), or the UniCAR stop (lacking signaling domains) T-cells were included as controls at the two highest E:T ratios. The cytotoxic effect was then evaluated using a luminescence-based assay. Results are shown as mean ± SD for two to four independent T-cell donors as indicated in the figure (** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001, comparison to samples w/o TM; Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 3. Targeting Nalm-6 Luc cells with UniCAR T-cells armed with anti-CD10 TM. (A) Either Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc cells were incubated with UniCAR T-cells in the addition of 50 nM anti-CD10 or anti-CD19 TM at 5:1 effector to target cell (E:T) ratio (** p < 0.0021, comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test). (B) Nalm-6 Luc cells were incubated with different ratios of UniCAR T-cells for 7 h in the absence, or presence, of 50 nM of the anti-CD10 TM. The Vector control (expressing EGFP only), or the UniCAR stop (lacking signaling domains) T-cells were included as controls at the two highest E:T ratios. The cytotoxic effect was then evaluated using a luminescence-based assay. Results are shown as mean ± SD for two to four independent T-cell donors as indicated in the figure (** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001, comparison to samples w/o TM; Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test).
Ijms 23 04920 g003
Ijms 23 04920 g004 550
Figure 4. Estimation of effective working concentrations of anti-CD10 TM. In order to determine the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the anti-CD10 TM, Nalm-6 Luc cells were incubated with UniCAR T-cells at an E:T ratio of 5:1 in the presence of a range of anti-CD10 TM concentrations (1000 nM to 0.05 nM) for 7 h. The killing was then evaluated using luminescence-based assay. Results are shown as mean ± SD of four independent T-cell donors (* p < 0.0332, ** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 4. Estimation of effective working concentrations of anti-CD10 TM. In order to determine the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the anti-CD10 TM, Nalm-6 Luc cells were incubated with UniCAR T-cells at an E:T ratio of 5:1 in the presence of a range of anti-CD10 TM concentrations (1000 nM to 0.05 nM) for 7 h. The killing was then evaluated using luminescence-based assay. Results are shown as mean ± SD of four independent T-cell donors (* p < 0.0332, ** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).
Ijms 23 04920 g004
Ijms 23 04920 g005 550
Figure 5. Cytokine release from UniCAR T-cells upon engaging with Nalm-6 Luc cells via anti-CD10 TM. UniCAR T-cells were incubated for 7 h, either alone or in the presence of one of the cell lines (Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc), at 5:1 E:T ratio. There was also the addition of 50 nM of anti-CD10 TM or anti-CD19 TM. The cell-free supernatants were then collected and the cytokines were analyzed by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Data is shown as mean ± SD of three independent T-cell donors (** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001; comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 5. Cytokine release from UniCAR T-cells upon engaging with Nalm-6 Luc cells via anti-CD10 TM. UniCAR T-cells were incubated for 7 h, either alone or in the presence of one of the cell lines (Nalm-6 Luc or Molm-13 Luc), at 5:1 E:T ratio. There was also the addition of 50 nM of anti-CD10 TM or anti-CD19 TM. The cell-free supernatants were then collected and the cytokines were analyzed by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Data is shown as mean ± SD of three independent T-cell donors (** p < 0.0021, *** p < 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001; comparison to sample w/o TM; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).
Ijms 23 04920 g005
Ijms 23 04920 g006 550
Figure 6. Targeting patient-derived B-ALL blasts with armed UniCAR T-cells. (A) Expression of CD10 and CD19 on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) blasts was detected by flow cytometry after staining with VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD10 or anti-CD19 mAb (dark gray). As a negative control, cells were stained with isotype control (light gray). (B) B-ALL blasts were incubated with UniCAR T-cells in the presence of 50 nM anti-CD10 TM, anti-CD19 TM or combination of both TMs at an E:T ratio of 1:1. The viability of ALL blasts was measured using flow cytometry after 24 and 48 h. Results are shown as mean ± SD of two independent T-cell donors for each B-ALL donor (Dn.).
Figure 6. Targeting patient-derived B-ALL blasts with armed UniCAR T-cells. (A) Expression of CD10 and CD19 on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) blasts was detected by flow cytometry after staining with VioBlue-conjugated anti-CD10 or anti-CD19 mAb (dark gray). As a negative control, cells were stained with isotype control (light gray). (B) B-ALL blasts were incubated with UniCAR T-cells in the presence of 50 nM anti-CD10 TM, anti-CD19 TM or combination of both TMs at an E:T ratio of 1:1. The viability of ALL blasts was measured using flow cytometry after 24 and 48 h. Results are shown as mean ± SD of two independent T-cell donors for each B-ALL donor (Dn.).
Ijms 23 04920 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mitwasi, N.; Arndt, C.; Loureiro, L.R.; Kegler, A.; Fasslrinner, F.; Berndt, N.; Bergmann, R.; Hořejší, V.; Rössig, C.; Bachmann, M.; et al. Targeting CD10 on B-Cell Leukemia Using the Universal CAR T-Cell Platform (UniCAR). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094920

AMA Style

Mitwasi N, Arndt C, Loureiro LR, Kegler A, Fasslrinner F, Berndt N, Bergmann R, Hořejší V, Rössig C, Bachmann M, et al. Targeting CD10 on B-Cell Leukemia Using the Universal CAR T-Cell Platform (UniCAR). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):4920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mitwasi, Nicola, Claudia Arndt, Liliana R. Loureiro, Alexandra Kegler, Frederick Fasslrinner, Nicole Berndt, Ralf Bergmann, Vaclav Hořejší, Claudia Rössig, Michael Bachmann, and et al. 2022. "Targeting CD10 on B-Cell Leukemia Using the Universal CAR T-Cell Platform (UniCAR)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 4920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop