Next Article in Journal
AMBRA1 p.Gln30Arg Mutation, Identified in a Cowden Syndrome Family, Exhibits Hyperproliferative Potential in hTERT-RPE1 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The Identification and Expression Analysis of the Nitraria sibirica Pall. Auxin-Response Factor (ARF) Gene Family
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms231911119
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Antivirulence Activity of Umbelliferone and Its Protective Effect against A. hydrophila-Infected Grass Carp

by
Ling Zhao
1,†,
Xiaoyu Jin
1,†,
Ziqian Xiong
1,
Huaqiao Tang
1,
Hongrui Guo
1,
Gang Ye
1,
Defang Chen
2,
Shiyong Yang
2,
Zhongqiong Yin
1,
Hualin Fu
1,
Yuanfeng Zou
1,
Xu Song
1,
Cheng Lv
1,
Wei Zhang
1,
Yinglun Li
1,* and
Xun Wang
2,*
1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11119; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911119
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A. hydrophila is an important pathogen that mainly harms aquatic animals and has exhibited resistance to a variety of antibiotics. Here, to seek an effective alternative for antibiotics, the effects of umbelliferone (UM) at sub-MICs on A. hydrophila virulence factors and the quorum-sensing system were studied. Subsequently, RNA sequencing was employed to explore the potential mechanisms for the antivirulence activity of umbelliferone. Meanwhile, the protective effect of umbelliferone on grass carp infected with A. hydrophila was studied in vivo. Our results indicated that umbelliferone could significantly inhibit A. hydrophila virulence such as hemolysis, biofilm formation, swimming and swarming motility, and their quorum-sensing signals AHL and AI-2. Transcriptomic analysis showed that umbelliferone downregulated expression levels of genes related to exotoxin, the secretory system (T2SS and T6SS), iron uptake, etc. Animal studies demonstrated that umbelliferone could significantly improve the survival of grass carps infected with A. hydrophila, reduce the bacterial load in the various tissues, and ameliorate cardiac, splenic, and hepatopancreas injury. Collectively, umbelliferone can reduce the pathogenicity of A. hydrophila and is a potential drug for treating A. hydrophila infection.

1. Introduction

A. hydrophila is a common opportunistic fish bacterial pathogen, one of the main severe threats to aquaculture, and is prevalent worldwide. This disease exhibits a high fatality rate and can cause septicemia in carp [1], perch [2], catfish [3], and grass carp; red-leg syndrome in frog; and red sore disease in perch and carp [4]. There are many factors affecting the pathogenicity of A. hydrophila, including surface polysaccharide, surface layer, flagella, iron-binding system, exotoxin and extracellular enzyme, secretion system, biofilm, and motility [5]. When environmental conditions are favorable, planktonic A. hydrophila frequently adapts to their surrounding environment and causes disease by secreting various virulence factors. When environmental conditions deteriorate, the biofilm produced by A. hydrophila can provide a protective effect on autochthonous bacteria. Bacteria residing in the biofilm can continuously secrete proteolytic enzymes and adhesins to enhance bacterial virulence and antibiotic resistance [6].
Over the past many years, the strategy for treating and preventing A. hydrophila infection mainly relied on antibiotics. Long-term antibiotic use had generated pan-resistance to sulfonamides, chloramphenicols, tetracyclines, streptomycin, ampicillin, and other antimicrobials. A. hydrophila strains isolated from zebrafish in Seoul, Korea, were found to be resistant to amoxicillin (100%), naphthalic acid (100%), ampicillin (93.02%), tetracycline (74.42%) and imipenem (65.15%) [7], and the strains isolated from goldfish in India were also resistant to multiple antibiotics [8]. Additionally, the abuse of antibiotics can damage water bodies and the structure of intestinal flora in aquatic animals, further increasing the difficulty of aquatic disease prevention and treatment.
Plant-derived bioactive constituents with vigorous antivirulence activity have become an essential source of potential drugs for treating bacterial infections. Early studies have shown that coumarins, critical secondary metabolites in various plants, are potential antibacterial agents. Several pyrenylated coumarins and furanocoumarins extracted from the roots of Prangos hulusii exhibit activity of bacterial growth suppression [9]. Daphnetin (7,8-dihydroxycoumarin) has been demonstrated to exert anti-H.pylori activity by preventing H. pylori colonization of the stomach [10]. Benzothiazole–1,2,3- triazole–coumarin showed good anti-Moraxella catarrhalis potency (MIC ≤ 0.25 μg/mL) comparable to that of reference antibiotic azithromycin [11]. Coumarins mainly attenuate the pathogenicity of pathogens by inhibiting bacterial virulence factors, decreasing biofilm formation, or regulating quorum-sensing (QS) signals. Gutierrez-Barranquero et al. reported that coumarin could inhibit biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and Edwardii, protease activity in S. maltophilia and B. cepacia, and bioluminescence in A. fischeri [12]. Lee et al. suggested that the inhibition of coumarin and umbelliferone on biofilms might be related to the reduction of QS-controlled lsrA gene expression [13].
Umbelliferone(7-hydroxycoumarin) is a kind of coumarin derivative with a hydroxyl substitute at position C7 widely derived from plants. Among various coumarin derivatives, hydroxycoumarin is considered a type with relatively prominent antimicrobial activity. Yang Liang et al. tested the inhibitory effects of 18 kinds of coumarins against the plant pathogen R. solanacearum and found that umbelliferone had better antibacterial activity than coumarin [14]. Although there have been some studies on the activity of umbelliferone against bacteria such as R. solanacearum and E. coli [13], its effect on aquatic animal pathogens has not been reported. In our preliminary study, umbelliferone exhibited a significant inhibition effect on the quorum-sensing system of A. hydrophila, suggesting that umbelliferone has potential antivirulence activity. Here, we explored the effect of umbelliferone on the virulence factors of A. hydrophila and analyzed its potential mechanism through transcriptome information. Furthermore, the protective effect of umbelliferone on grass carp infected with A. hydrophila was studied. Our results demonstrated that umbelliferone had an obvious inhibitory effect on the pathogenicity of A. hydrophila in vitro and in vivo.

2. Results

2.1. Inhibition of Virulence of A. hydrophila by Umbelliferone

The MIC value of umbelliferone to A. hydrophila is 512 μg/mL. The growth curve (Figure 1B) shows that when the concentration of umbelliferone was lower than 128 μg/mL (1/4MIC), it had no significant effect on the growth of A. hydrophila. All subsequent experiments were performed at subinhibitory concentrations (16–128 μg/mL) of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila.
The effect of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila biofilm is shown in Figure 1C. Umbelliferone had an inhibitory effect on A. hydrophila biofilm formation after being treated for 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. At 48 h, the maximum effect of 53.84% on biofilm formation was observed at a concentration of 128 μg/mL. These results indicated that umbelliferone mainly interfered with biofilm maturation.
Figure 1D indicates the results of the hemolysis test. The A. hydrophila strain displayed remarkably strong hemolysis of rabbit erythrocytes. Umbelliferone could significantly reduce hemolysis induced by A. hydrophila (p < 0.001). When the umbelliferone concentration was 16, 32, 64, and 128 μg/mL, the inhibition rate was 10.92%, 30.65%, 77.23%, and 95.25%, respectively.
Swimming and swarming were regulated by the flagellar movement of bacteria and were considered closely related to biofilm formation. In the present study, we observed these types of motilities in the presence of the sub-MICs umbelliferone (Figure 1E,F). Swimming and swarming motility assays were performed on a semisolid medium containing 0.3% and 0.5% agar, respectively. Umbelliferone treatment inhibited swimming and swarming motility. After being incubated at 30 °C for 17 h, umbelliferone inhibited the swimming of bacteria in a dose-dependent manner, and the peak suppression was 59.52% at 128 μg/mL (1/4 MIC). After incubating at 30 °C for 24 h and 48 h, umbelliferone significantly inhibited the swarming at high sub-MICs, and the peak suppressions were 23% for 24 h and 47.3% for 48 h, respectively.

2.2. Effects of Umbelliferone on Quorum-Sensing Signals of A. hydrophila

Two experiments were conducted to observe the effects of umbelliferone on AHL and AI-2, which are two quorum-sensing signals of A. hydrophila. We investigated the influences of the coculture supernatant of A. hydrophila with umbelliferone on violacein production in the AHL indicator strain C. violaceum CV026 and bioluminescence intensity in the AI-2 indicator strain V. harveyi BB170. As shown in Figure 2A, compared with the control group, the color of violacein in the three drug treatment groups was significantly lighter, and almost no violacein could be observed in the high-concentration group (128 μg/mL). According to Figure 2B, compared with the control group, the bioluminescence intensity in V. harveyi BB170 was decreased significantly in the umbelliferone groups. These results indicated that umbelliferone could significantly inhibit the quorum-sensing system in A. hydrophila.

2.3. Transcriptome Changes in A. hydrophila after Umbelliferone Treatment

We obtained about 7.0 G of clean data by transcriptome sequencing. Approximately 93.80~95.58% of the clean data were mapped to the reference genome (Table S1). Transcriptome analysis identified 1896 differentially expressed genes between umbelliferone treated and untreated A. hydrophila, of which upregulated and downregulated genes were 848 and 1048, respectively (Figure 3A, Table S2). The results of hierarchical cluster analysis (Figure 3B) and principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 3C) showed that six different samples were clustered into two groups according to DEGs expression data. The umbelliferone treatment groups were clustered into a subgroup and separated from the control groups. Intriguingly, treatment with umbelliferone significantly reduced the expression of genes related to bacterial exotoxin, the two-component system, and the secretion system (Table 1), while genes linked with ribosomes, the citric acid cycle, carbon metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation were upregulated (Table 2). Functional enrichment analysis found that upregulated genes are mainly implicated in translation, biosynthetic-, and metabolic-related biological processes, and downregulated genes are involved in transport, signal transduction, biological regulation, etc. (Figure 3D, Table S3).

2.4. qRT-PCR Validation of Transcriptome Data

To confirm the reliability of transcriptome sequencing, qRT-PCR was used to verify the expression of 12 randomly selected genes. All selected genes showed consistent results between RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR data (Figure 4).

2.5. Protective Effect of Umbelliferone on Grass Carp Infected with A. hydrophila

To further verify the effect of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila in vivo, we investigated the protective effect of umbelliferone on grass carp infected by A. hydrophila. After infection with A. hydrophila, all animals in the model group showed obvious clinical symptoms, including inappetence, lethargy, reduced general activity, unresponsiveness, and staying at the bottom of the tank. Compared with the infection model group (A.H), grass carps in the low-dose group (A.H + UM 50 mg/kg) had a roughly 50% increase in appetite and improved mental state. The fish in the blank control group and the high-dose group (A.H + UM 100 mg/kg) had good mental states, sensitive reactions, and normal appetite. At 48 h postinfection of A. hydrophila, grass carps in the infection model group (A.H) showed redness, swelling, and bleeding at the injection site of the pectoral fin, abdominal enlargement, and even severe ascites. Both doses of umbelliferone significantly alleviated the bleeding at the injection site of the pectoral fin and ascites caused by A. hydrophila (Figure 5A).
After an intraperitoneal injection of A. hydrophila, the survival of grass carps in each group was recorded every 12 h until 48 h. The results are shown in Figure 5B. Survival in the infection model group (A.H) rapidly decreased after 12 h, and the final survival at 48 h was only 20.80%. The preventive administration of umbelliferone can significantly increase the survival of grass carps. The 48 h survivals were 61.38% in the high-concentration group (A.H + UM 100 mg/kg) and 44.80% in the low-concentration group (A.H + UM 50 mg/kg).
Forty-eight hours after challenge with A. hydrophila, the heart, hepatopancreas, spleens, mesonephros, and head kidneys were harvested for enumeration of bacteria. The results (Figure 5C–G) showed that umbelliferone could significantly reduce the bacterial load in all these tissues.
Histopathological examination showed that A. hydrophila could cause noticeable pathological changes in the heart, spleen, and hepatopancreas of grass carps. In the infection model group, the cytoplasm of dispersed cardiomyocytes was coagulated (Figure 6A). The endothelial cells swelled, and the myocardial fibers were broken. Meanwhile, abundant hemosiderin granules were deposited in the spleen (Figure 6B). In addition, as shown in Figure 6C, apparent congestion of hepatic sinusoids was observed. The hepatocytes around the blood vessels were swollen and structurally blurred. Cytoplasmic pyknosis and structural disintegration were visible in pancreatic acinar cells (Figure 6D). Administration of umbelliferone obviously improved these pathological damages caused by A. hydrophila.

3. Discussion

In this study, we researched the effects of umbelliferone on various virulence of A. hydrophila at sub-MICs. Biofilm formation is a crucial virulence property. The protective effect of biofilm on bacteria can make the bacteria in the biofilm withstand the damage of pH change, nutrient deficiency, and mechanical force in the surrounding environment. It is also considered an essential factor for the occurrence of multidrug resistance of bacteria [15]. In this study, the biofilm formation test indicated that umbelliferone significantly inhibited the formation of A. hydrophila biofilm, with the highest inhibition rate of 53.8% at 48 h. Similar antibiofilm activity against other bacteria was also observed [16]. It is well established that multiple factors can influence bacterial biofilm formation, one of which is bacterial motilities. Guided by hydrodynamics, bacteria can be reversibly attached to ideal surfaces by swimming in a low agar environment of 0.3–0.4%. Swarming occurs commonly on the surface of more viscous semisolid media (0.5–0.7% agar), driven by multiple flagella and requiring specific bacterial population density and nutrients [17,18]. Monte’s [19] research showed that umbelliferone reduced E. coli swimming, swarming motilities, and biofilm formation. In this experiment, umbelliferone inhibited the two motilities of A. hydrophila, which was consistent with the results of biofilm formation. A. hydrophila can produce and secrete hemolysin, often causing hemolysis of mammalian and fish red blood cells. The capacity of A. hydrophila-induced hemolysis is mainly related to its secreted exotoxins, including enterotoxin, cytotoxin, and aerolysin [20]. Our results showed that the inhibition rate of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila-induced hemolysis was up to 95.25% at 128 μg/mL. The inhibitory effect of coumarins on Vibrio brilliant-induced hemolysis has also been reported [21].
A recent study has shown that coumarins are potential quorum-sensing inhibitors [22]. The quorum-sensing system is a bacterial cell-to-cell signaling system that regulates the production of virulence factors through signaling molecules. We found that umbelliferone reduced the production of violacein pigment by C. violaceum CV026 (AHL reporter strain) and the bioluminescence intensity of V. Harvey BB170 (AI-2 reporter strain), suggesting that umbelliferone could inhibit AHL and AI-2 production in A. hydrophila. According to these results, we speculated that the quorum-sensing inhibitory effect of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila might be one of the ways to inhibit bacterial virulence.
To further investigate the antivirulence mechanism of umbelliferone on A. hydrophila, the gene expression profiles in A. hydrophila were compared before and after treatment with umbelliferone. We found that some genes related to bacterial exotoxin, the two-component system, and the secretion system are downregulated post umbelliferone treatment. Among these differently differentially expressed genes, virulence-related genes are of the most concern. On the one hand, umbelliferone directly downregulated exotoxin genes encoding enterotoxin, RTX toxin, and heat-stable hemolysin, which play a vital role in the pathogenesis of A. hydrophila [23]. On the other hand, umbelliferone downregulated two systems (the two-component system and the secretion system) involved in controlling bacterial virulence factors. The two-component system in bacteria can regulate the expression of many virulence-related genes to help bacteria respond to environmental stimuli [24] and evade the host immune system [25]. The secretion system is the cellular device used by pathogenic bacteria to secrete virulence factors to invade the host cells. It has received a great deal of attention from microbiologists in recent years. In our experiment, the expression levels of some genes coding the type II secretion system (T2SS) and the type VI secretion system (T6SS) were downregulated after treatment with umbelliferone. T2SS is mainly involved in bacteria adhesion and the invasion of the host cells, secreting protease and cytotoxic enterotoxin, ultimately leading to host cell damage [26,27]. ExeI and exeN encode proteins containing procollagen signaling peptides in the type II secretion system. Umbelliferone can reduce the expression of both genes in A. hydrophila. T6SS can directly deliver effectors to target cells, participating in interbacterial competition and pathogenesis [28]. Our results indicated that the T6SS-related genes (e.g., PAAR, vgrG, vasH, tssK, and tssM) were downregulated in the umbelliferone treatment group. VgrG is expected to sit at the top of the Hcp tube and propel toward the target cell. The PAAR-repeat protein binds to the end of the VgrG trimer, forming the conical end of the Hcp-VgrG puncture structure [29]. TssK is a baseplate component, and TssM is a membrane complex [30,31]. Combining the above literature with our results, we speculate that the T6SS system is one of the critical targets for umbelliferone to reduce toxin secretion from A. hydrophila. Iron regulates the metabolic process and the pathogenicity of bacteria, which is closely related to biofilm formation and the pathogenicity of bacteria [32,33]. ExbB-ExbD is a protein complex that harvests energy and transmits it via TonB to TonB-dependent outer membrane receptors to trigger iron uptake [34]. After treatment with umbelliferone, the expression of genes, including TonBs, ExbB, and ExbD, were downregulated, indicating that the drug can reduce iron uptake in A. hydrophila.
The results of the in vivo experiment further confirmed the protective effect of umbelliferone on infected animals with A. hydrophila. Early administration of umbelliferone could significantly reduce the mortality of grass carps infected by A. hydrophila, decrease the bacterial load in tissues, and effectively alleviate symptoms. These results demonstrated that prophylactic administration of umbelliferone could be helpful in eliminating bacteria and attenuating A. hydrophila infection. However, umbelliferone can only partially eliminate bacteria in tissues, suggesting that there are other important ways to resist infection with A. hydrophila in vivo, such as decreasing the virulence to attenuate bacterial pathogenicity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains, Chemical Reagents, and Cultivation

The clinical isolate A. hydrophila was kindly provided by Prof. Defang Chen (Sichuan Agriculture University) and was used throughout the in vitro and in vivo study. Umbelliferone (purity >98%) was purchased from Shanghai Yuan Ye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Umbelliferone was dissolved in 100% DMSO to make 80 mg/mL and stored at −20 °C. The stock solution was diluted with culture medium or PBS before use. All bacterial culture mediums were purchased from Haibo Bio (Qingdao, China). A. hydrophila were cultured in TSB or on TSA at 30 °C unless otherwise stated.

4.2. Determinations of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Growth Curve

The MIC was determined by the microdilution broth method. To measure the growth curve of A. hydrophila, the bacterial suspension was cultured with continuous shaking in TSB at 30 °C with or without umbelliferone, and the optical density at 600 nm of the mixture was measured every 2 h.

4.3. Biofilm Formation

The crystal violet staining method was used to determine biofilm formation. Overnight-cultured bacteria were diluted at 1:100 in TSB, and 200 µL was then added to a 96-well plate and incubated with various concentrations of umbelliferone at 30 °C. Cultures were sampled after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, and the OD600 values of the cultures were determined. Nonadhered bacteria were removed and gently rinsed three times with PBS. The biofilm was fixed in methanol for 15 min and stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 min. The excess stain was washed away with distilled water and dried. Bound crystal violet was dissolved with 100 µL of 33% acetic acid for 30 min, and OD values of these solutions were measured at 590 nm. The ratio of OD590/OD600 was used to determine biofilm production.

4.4. Motility Assays

LB medium with 0.3% agar (wt/vol) was used for the swimming motility assay, and LB medium with 0.5% agar (wt/vol) for the swarming motility assay. The sub-MICs of umbelliferone were added to the swimming medium or swarming medium. After drying, 5 μL of overnight bacterial suspensions were stabbed into the plates and incubated at 30 °C for designated times. The diameter of the migration zone of bacteria was measured.

4.5. Hemolysis Assay

The hemolysis assay was performed using the modified method of Jing Dong et al. [35]. Overnight-cultured bacteria were diluted at 1:100 in TSB, then sub-MICs of umbelliferone were added to the bacterial suspension and incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 160 r/min for 17 h. Simultaneously, the blank control group (only with medium), the bacterial group (without drugs), and the solvent control group were set up. The cocultures were centrifuged at 4500 r/min for 10 min. Next, 60 μL of supernatant was added to 940 μL of 5% rabbit erythrocyte suspension and incubated in an incubator at 37 °C for 20 min. The supernatant was obtained by 10,000 r/min centrifugation for 2 min, and the absorbance was determined at 543 nm.

4.6. Determination of Quorum-Sensing Signals

The effect of umbelliferone on AHL quorum-sensing signals was detected using C. violaceum CV026 as an indicator. A. hydrophila treated with or without umbelliferone under sub-MICs were incubated for 12 h at 30 °C with shaking, then were centrifuged at 7000 r/min for 5 min to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was extracted by an equal volume of ethyl acetate (containing 0.5% methanoic acid) three times. The upper organic phase was collected and dried in a vacuum drying oven. The dried residue was dissolved into 200 μL dimethyl sulfoxide and stored at 4 °C. The overnight cultures of C. violaceum CV026 were mixed at 1% (vol/vol) with LB solid medium (40 °C). Then, 30 μL of the extracted AHL was added into the hole on the agar plate and cultured overnight at 30 °C to observe whether there was a purple circle and measure the circle diameter.
The effect of umbelliferone on AI-2 quorum-sensing signals was measured by using V. harveyi BB170 as an indicator. A. hydrophila treated with or without umbelliferone under sub-MICs were incubated for 12 h at 30 °C with shaking, then centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane and stored at 4 °C. V. harveyi BB170 was diluted by 1:1000 in fresh AB medium. Subsequently, 180 μL of the diluted V. harveyi BB170 solution and 20 μL of the supernatant of A. hydrophila cultures treated or untreated with umbelliferone were added to a white 96-well plate and incubated at 30 °C. After 0 h, 12 h, and 15 h, chemiluminescence was detected using a microplate reader (VarioskanFlash LUX, Thermo Fisher).

4.7. RNA Isolation and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from A. hydrophila cultures grown for 12 h with or without umbelliferone (128 μg/mL) treatment using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was assessed using Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), followed by mRNA being purified from total RNA using probes to remove rRNA. Following fragmentation, the cDNA library was constructed and sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq platform at the Novogene Bioinformatics Institute (Beijing, China).

4.8. Quantification of Gene Expression Level

Clean reads were obtained by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N, and low-quality reads from raw data and were then mapped to the A. hydrophila genome (RefSeq assembly accession: GCF_000963645.1) using bowtie2 (ver. 2.3.4.3) [36]. HTSeq (ver. 0.9.1) was used to count the read numbers mapped to each gene [37], and the fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (FPKM) for each gene were then calculated based on the length of the gene and the read counts mapped to the gene.

4.9. Differential Expression and Functional Enrichment Analyses

Differential expression analysis was performed using R package DESeq2 (ver. 1.20) [38]. Genes with an adjusted p-value of <0.05 found by DESeq were assigned as differentially expressed. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes were implemented by the R package cluster profile (ver. 3.8.1) [39].

4.10. qRT-PCR

The reliability of transcriptome data was validated by qRT-PCR of 12 selected genes. Total RNA was harvested from control and sub-MICs of umbelliferone-treated cultures of A. hydrophila strains using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then RNA was reversed transcribed to cDNA by PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time). Real-time PCR was conducted using TB Green Premix EX TaqTM (Tli RNaseH Plus) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The normalized gene expression levels were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method using the apoA gene as the endogenous control. The primer pairs used in this study are shown in Table S4.

4.11. Animal Experiments

All animal experiments were conducted under the guidance of the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (Permit No. DKY-S20176908). Grass carps (body length: 10–15 cm, weight: 23–27 g) were obtained from Qianhu Aquatic Fish Fry Mall. A total of 120 grass carps were acclimated for 7 days and fed with a commercial feed (Tongwei, China) (composition: 30.0% protein, 4.0% lipid, 12.0% carbohydrate, and 15.0% ash) three times a day at 3% of body weight. Water was partly replaced daily, and the water temperature was maintained at 21 ± 1 °C with a heating rod, continuously aerated with an air pump. All fish were maintained on a 12:12 hour light: dark cycle. Grass carps were randomly divided into four groups, including two umbelliferone treatment groups (50 and 100 mg/kg·bw), the infection model group, and the blank control group. Three replicates (each with 10 fish) were performed for each group. Dexamethasone was injected intraperitoneally with 200 μg per fish for 3 days. Seventy hours later, drug treatment groups, the infection model group, and the blank control group were intraperitoneally administrated with 0.1 mL of umbelliferone, DMSO, and PBS, respectively. Two hours post above treatment, A. hydrophila was intraperitoneally challenged with 5 × 108 CFU/mL in the infection model and drug treatment groups. The clinical symptoms and the mortalities were recorded at 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h after bacterial challenge. In addition, bacterial load assessment and histopathological examination were respectively performed by random selection of three grass carps from each replicate at 48 h postchallenge.
Assessment of bacterial loads in tissues. Under aseptic conditions, the heart, hepatopancreas, spleen, mesonephros, and cephalic kidneys were homogenized and diluted in PBS. 0.1 mL diluent was coated on A. hydrophila isolation medium (RS solid medium) and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Colonies were counted to calculate the average number of CFU/g.
Histopathological examination. Hearts, spleens, and hepatopancreases were removed, washed with normal saline, and fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution. After gradient alcohol dehydration, the tissues were embedded in paraffin wax. Histological sections (5 μm) were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Zeiss Axio Imager system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used for microscopic imaging of tissue sections.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 23.0 software (IBM Corp.). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM, and comparisons between the two groups were performed using Student’s t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

The sub-MICs of umbelliferone could significantly inhibit the virulence of A. hydrophila in vitro, increase the survival rate of grass carps infected with A. hydrophila, and effectively reduce the bacterial load in the viscera. The two-component system and secretory system may be the potential pathways of umbelliferone to reduce the virulence of A. hydrophila. Umbelliferone may be a promising drug candidate for the prevention/treatment of A. hydrophila infection in aquatic animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms231911119/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z., X.W., and Y.L.; methodology, X.J., Z.X., D.C., G.Y., W.Z., and C.L.; software, L.Z., and H.T.; validation, H.G., and S.Y.; formal analysis, L.Z., and X.J.; data curation, X.S., and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.W., and Y.L.; supervision, Z.Y., and H.F.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Double Plan of Sichuan Agricultural University (2221993246 to X.W.), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province of China (2022NSFSC0070 to S.Y.), the Project of Provincial 14th Five Years’ Animal Breeding of Sichuan Province(2021YFYZ0015 to S.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experiment was conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (Permit No. DKY-S20176908).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-seq datasets are available in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021) in the National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acids Res 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA007591).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the OmicShare forum, a free online platform for data analysis (http://www.omicshare.com/tools (accessed on 17 March 2022)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.; Liu, N.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, X. The effects of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on oxidative stress, nonspecific immunity, autophagy, and apoptosis in the common carp. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 105, 103587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fu, X.; Lin, Q.; Liu, L.; Liang, H.; Huang, Z.; Li, N. Display of ISKNV orf086 protein on the surface of Aeromonas hydrophila and its immunogenicity in Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 56, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abdelhamed, H.; Banes, M.; Karsi, A.; Lawrence, M.L. Recombinant ATPase of Virulent Aeromonas hydrophila Protects Channel Catfish Against Motile Aeromonas Septicemia. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hazen, T.C.; Raker, M.L.; Esch, G.W.; Fliermans, C.B. Ultrastruct of red-sore lesions on largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): Association of the ciliate Epistylis sp. and the bacterium. Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Protozool. 1978, 25, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tomas, J.M. The main Aeromonas pathogenic factors. ISRN Microbiol. 2012, 2012, 256261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barger, P.C.; Liles, M.R.; Beck, B.H.; Newton, J.C. Differential production and secretion of potentially toxigenic extracellular proteins from hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila under biofilm and planktonic culture. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hossain, S.; Dahanayake, P.S.; De Silva, B.; Wickramanayake, M.; Wimalasena, S.; Heo, G.J. Multidrug resistant Aeromonas spp. isolated from zebrafish (Danio rerio): Antibiogram, antimicrobial resistance genes and class 1 integron gene cassettes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Preena, P.G.; Arathi, D.; Raj, N.S.; Arun, K.T.; Arun, R.S.; Reshma, R.N.; Raja, S.T. Diversity of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens from a freshwater ornamental fish farm. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 71, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tan, N.; Yazici-Tutunis, S.; Bilgin, M.; Tan, E.; Miski, M. Antibacterial Activities of Pyrenylated Coumarins from the Roots of Prangos hulusii. Molecules 2017, 22, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, G.; Pang, J.; Hu, X.; Nie, T.; Lu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, X.; Jiang, J.; et al. Daphnetin: A Novel Anti-Helicobacter pylori Agent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Maracic, S.; Kraljevic, T.G.; Paljetak, H.C.; Peric, M.; Matijasic, M.; Verbanac, D.; Cetina, M.; Raic-Malic, S. 1,2,3-Triazole pharmacophore-based benzofused nitrogen/sulfur heterocycles with potential anti-Moraxella catarrhalis activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 7448–7463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gutierrez-Barranquero, J.A.; Reen, F.J.; McCarthy, R.R.; O’Gara, F. Deciphering the role of coumarin as a novel quorum sensing inhibitor suppressing virulence phenotypes in bacterial pathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 3303–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Cho, H.S.; Ryu, S.Y.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Coumarins reduce biofilm formation and the virulence of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, L.; Ding, W.; Xu, Y.; Wu, D.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Guo, B. New insights into the antibacterial activity of hydroxycoumarins against ralstonia solanacearum. Molecules 2016, 21, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.; Singh, S.K.; Chowdhury, I.; Singh, R. Understanding the Mechanism of Bacterial Biofilms Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents. Open Microbiol. J. 2017, 11, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, L.; Li, S.; Qin, X.; Jiang, G.; Chen, J.; Li, B.; Yao, X.; Liang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, W. Exposure to Umbelliferone Reduces Ralstonia solanacearum Biofilm Formation, Transcription of Type III Secretion System Regulators and Effectors and Virulence on Tobacco. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patriquin, G.M.; Banin, E.; Gilmour, C.; Tuchman, R.; Greenberg, E.P.; Poole, K. Influence of quorum sensing and iron on twitching motility and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yeung, A.T.; Torfs, E.C.; Jamshidi, F.; Bains, M.; Wiegand, I.; Hancock, R.E.; Overhage, J. Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is controlled by a broad spectrum of transcriptional regulators, including MetR. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 5592–5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Monte, J.; Abreu, A.C.; Borges, A.; Simoes, L.C.; Simoes, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Phytochemicals against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and Their Biofilms. Pathogens 2014, 3, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chopra, A.K.; Houston, C.W.; Peterson, J.W.; Jin, G.F. Cloning, expression, and sequence analysis of a cytolytic enterotoxin gene from Aeromonas hydrophila. Can. J. Microbiol. 1993, 39, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Liu, N.; Liang, W.; Han, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, C. Quorum sensing-disrupting coumarin suppressing virulence phenotypes in Vibrio splendidus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 3371–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Sass, A.; Van Acker, H.; Wille, J.; Verhasselt, B.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Kaever, V.; Crabbe, A.; Coenye, T. Coumarin Reduces Virulence and Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Affecting Quorum Sensing, Type III Secretion and C-di-GMP Levels. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lo, H.R.; Lin, J.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Chen, C.L.; Shao, C.P.; Lai, Y.C.; Hor, L.I. RTX toxin enhances the survival of Vibrio vulnificus during infection by protecting the organism from phagocytosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 1866–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fabret, C.; Feher, V.A.; Hoch, J.A. Two-component signal transduction in Bacillus subtilis: How one organism sees its world. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 1975–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mahan, M.J.; Slauch, J.M.; Mekalanos, J.J. Selection of bacterial virulence genes that are specifically induced in host tissues. Science 1993, 259, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jackson-Litteken, C.D.; Di Venanzio, G.; Le, N.H.; Scott, N.E.; Djahanschiri, B.; Distel, J.S.; Pardue, E.J.; Ebersberger, I.; Felman, M.F. InvL, an invasin-like adhesin, is a type II secretion system substrate required for Acinetobacter baumannii uropathogenesis. mBio 2022, 3, e00258-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Green, E.R.; Meccas, J. Bacterial Secretion Systems: An Overview. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zoued, A.; Brunet, Y.R.; Durand, E.; Aschtgen, M.S.; Logger, L.; Douzi, B.; Journet, L.; Cambillau, C.; Cascales, E. Architecture and assembly of the Type VI secretion system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cianfanelli, F.R.; Monlezun, L.; Coulthurst, S.J. Aim, Load, Fire: The Type VI Secretion System, a Bacterial Nanoweapon. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. English, G.; Byron, O.; Cianfanelli, F.R.; Prescott, A.R.; Coulthurst, S.J. Biochemical analysis of TssK, a core component of the bacterial Type VI secretion system, reveals distinct oligomeric states of TssK and identifies a TssK-TssFG subcomplex. Biochem. J. 2014, 461, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Felisberto-Rodrigues, C.; Durand, E.; Aschtgen, M.S.; Blangy, S.; Ortiz-Lombardia, M.; Douzi, B.; Cambillau, C.; Cascales, E. Towards a structural comprehension of bacterial type VI secretion systems: Characterization of the TssJ-TssM complex of an Escherichia coli pathovar. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Juarez, G.E.; Galvan, E.M. Role of nutrient limitation in the competition between uropathogenic strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in mixed biofilms. Biofouling 2018, 34, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hsu, J.L.; Manouvakhova, O.V.; Clemons, K.V.; Inayathullah, M.; Tu, A.B.; Sobel, R.A.; Tian, A.; Nazik, H.; Pothineni, V.R.; Pasupneti, S.; et al. Microhemorrhage-associated tissue iron enhances the risk for Aspergillus fumigatus invasion in a mouse model of airway transplantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaag2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Noinaj, N.; Guillier, M.; Barnard, T.J.; Buchanan, S.K. TonB-dependent transporters: Regulation, structure, and function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dong, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Xu, N.; Zhou, S.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Ai, X. Thymol Protects Channel Catfish from Aeromonas hydrophila Infection by Inhibiting Aerolysin Expression and Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, G.; Wang, L.G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 11119 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of umbelliferone on the virulence of A. hydrophila: (A) structure of umbelliferone; (B) growth curve of A. hydrophila; (C) biofilm formation of A. hydrophila was detected by the crystal violet staining method; (D) effect of umbelliferone on hemolysis activity of A. hydrophila; (E) effect of umbelliferone on swimming motility of A. hydrophila; (F) effect of umbelliferone on swarming motility of A. hydrophila; ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01, *, p < 0.05; ns, not significant, compared with the control (0 μg/mL).
Figure 1. Effect of umbelliferone on the virulence of A. hydrophila: (A) structure of umbelliferone; (B) growth curve of A. hydrophila; (C) biofilm formation of A. hydrophila was detected by the crystal violet staining method; (D) effect of umbelliferone on hemolysis activity of A. hydrophila; (E) effect of umbelliferone on swimming motility of A. hydrophila; (F) effect of umbelliferone on swarming motility of A. hydrophila; ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01, *, p < 0.05; ns, not significant, compared with the control (0 μg/mL).
Ijms 23 11119 g001
Ijms 23 11119 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of umbelliferone on the quorum-sensing signals of A. hydrophila. (A) Umbelliferone inhibited AHL production in A. hydrophila, which reduced violacein synthesis in C. violaceum CV026. (B) Umbelliferone inhibited AI-2 production in A. hydrophila, which reduced bioluminescence intensity in V. harveyi BB170. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; ns, not significant, compared with the control (0 μg/mL).
Figure 2. The effect of umbelliferone on the quorum-sensing signals of A. hydrophila. (A) Umbelliferone inhibited AHL production in A. hydrophila, which reduced violacein synthesis in C. violaceum CV026. (B) Umbelliferone inhibited AI-2 production in A. hydrophila, which reduced bioluminescence intensity in V. harveyi BB170. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; ns, not significant, compared with the control (0 μg/mL).
Ijms 23 11119 g002
Ijms 23 11119 g003 550
Figure 3. Transcriptome changes in A. hydrophila after umbelliferone treatment: (A) volcano plot of differentially expressed genes; (B) heatmap of the differentially expressed genes in A. hydrophila treated or untreated with umbelliferone; (C) PCA plot of differentially expressed genes. Control and umbelliferone treatment samples are shown in cyan and red, respectively; (D) functional enrichment analysis plot. Representative GO terms of up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes.
Figure 3. Transcriptome changes in A. hydrophila after umbelliferone treatment: (A) volcano plot of differentially expressed genes; (B) heatmap of the differentially expressed genes in A. hydrophila treated or untreated with umbelliferone; (C) PCA plot of differentially expressed genes. Control and umbelliferone treatment samples are shown in cyan and red, respectively; (D) functional enrichment analysis plot. Representative GO terms of up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes.
Ijms 23 11119 g003
Ijms 23 11119 g004 550
Figure 4. Validation of expression levels of 12 randomly selected genes by qRT-PCR compared with the transcriptome results. Results are represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 4. Validation of expression levels of 12 randomly selected genes by qRT-PCR compared with the transcriptome results. Results are represented by mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Ijms 23 11119 g004
Ijms 23 11119 g005 550
Figure 5. Protective effect of umbelliferone on grass carp infected with A. hydrophila. (A) Umbelliferone alleviates the symptoms of grass carps infected by A. hydrophila. (B) Umbelliferone increases the survival rate of grass carps infected with A. hydrophila. The bacterial load in (C) heart, (D) hepatopancreas, (E) spleen, (F) Mesonephros, and (G) Head kidney of grass carps with umbelliferone treatment decreased significantly. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01, *, p < 0.05, compared with the infection model group (0 mg/kg).
Figure 5. Protective effect of umbelliferone on grass carp infected with A. hydrophila. (A) Umbelliferone alleviates the symptoms of grass carps infected by A. hydrophila. (B) Umbelliferone increases the survival rate of grass carps infected with A. hydrophila. The bacterial load in (C) heart, (D) hepatopancreas, (E) spleen, (F) Mesonephros, and (G) Head kidney of grass carps with umbelliferone treatment decreased significantly. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01, *, p < 0.05, compared with the infection model group (0 mg/kg).
Ijms 23 11119 g005
Ijms 23 11119 g006 550
Figure 6. Histopathological analysis for selected tissues from various groups. Umbelliferone alleviated A. hydrophila-induced heart (A), spleen (B), and hepatopancreas (C,D) injury in grass carps. The sections were stained with H&E. Cardiomyocytes were dispersed (black star), deposited hemosiderin granules in the spleen (white arrows), apparent congestion of hepatic sinusoids (red arrow), cytoplasmic pyknosis (yellow arrow), and mild pericardial edema (black arrow).
Figure 6. Histopathological analysis for selected tissues from various groups. Umbelliferone alleviated A. hydrophila-induced heart (A), spleen (B), and hepatopancreas (C,D) injury in grass carps. The sections were stained with H&E. Cardiomyocytes were dispersed (black star), deposited hemosiderin granules in the spleen (white arrows), apparent congestion of hepatic sinusoids (red arrow), cytoplasmic pyknosis (yellow arrow), and mild pericardial edema (black arrow).
Ijms 23 11119 g006
Table
Table 1. The representative downregulated gene list.
Table 1. The representative downregulated gene list.
Gene NameLog2 Fold ChangeDescription
Genes associated with exotoxin
VU14_RS08845−1.6900HBL/NHE enterotoxin family protein
VU14_RS08840−2.304Bacillus hemolytic enterotoxin (HBL)
rtxA−1.5406MARTX multifunctional-autoprocessing repeats-in-toxin holotoxin RtxA
VU14_RS05570−1.5204Thermostable hemolysin
Genes associated with two-component system
VU14_RS20395−1.8170Two-component system response regulator
VU14_RS05225−1.5966Response regulator receiver domain
yehT−1.6300Two-component system response regulator BtsR
uhpB−1.5975Signal transduction histidine-protein kinase/phosphatase UhpB
Genes associated with secretory systems
exeI−1.6425GspI family T2SS minor pseudopilin variant ExeI
exeN−1.5519GspN family type II secretion system protein ExeN
VU14_RS12995−2.4463Type VI secretion system ImpA family
VU14_RS12990−2.0408Type VI secretion system PAAR protein
vgrG−1.7650Type VI secretion system effector VgrG
tssK−1.7623Type VI secretion system baseplate subunit TssK
tssM−1.6745Type VI secretion system membrane subunit TssM
vasH−1.1018σ-54-dependent transcriptional regulator VasH
VU14_RS13025−1.5086Type VI secretion system protein DotU
Genes associated with iron transport
VU14_RS01835−2.1770Ligand-gated channel protein
VU14_RS04515−1.8007Energy transducer TonB
VU14_RS20175−1.7896TonB-dependent siderophore receptor
VU14_RS04520−1.8444Biopolymer transporter ExbD
VU14_RS14250−1.7692TonB-dependent hemoglobin/transferrin/lactoferrin family receptor
VU14_RS17650−1.7498TonB-dependent hemoglobin/transferrin/lactoferrin family receptor
VU14_RS20010−1.5912TonB-dependent copper receptor
VU14_RS12465−1.5400TonB-dependent siderophore receptor
amoA−1.5178Isochorismate synthases AmoA
amoG−1.5635Amonabactin biosynthesis nonribosomal peptide synthetase AmoG
amoH−1.5880Amonabactin biosynthesis glycine adenylation protein AmoH
Table
Table 2. The representative upregulated gene list.
Table 2. The representative upregulated gene list.
Gene NameLog2 Fold ChangeDescription
Genes associated with ribosomes
rpsG2.246530S ribosomal protein S7
rpsF2.235530S ribosomal protein S6
rpsJ2.184930S ribosomal protein S10
rpsR2.163230S ribosomal protein S18
Genes associated with citrate cycle (TCA cycle)
mdh2.3949Malate dehydrogenase
VU14_RS122152.6071Fumarate hydratase
frdD2.3141Fumarate reductase subunit FrdD
sucD1.9545Succinate-CoA ligase subunit α
Genes associated with carbon metabolism
VU14_RS048502.2821Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
fadB2.4898Fatty acid oxidation complex subunit α FadB
VU14_RS063401.6773Formate dehydrogenase subunit α
Genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation
frdD2.3141Fumarate reductase subunit FrdD
sdhD1.7136Succinate dehydrogenase hydrophobic membrane anchor protein
sdhC1.5912Succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b556 subunit
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.; Jin, X.; Xiong, Z.; Tang, H.; Guo, H.; Ye, G.; Chen, D.; Yang, S.; Yin, Z.; Fu, H.; et al. The Antivirulence Activity of Umbelliferone and Its Protective Effect against A. hydrophila-Infected Grass Carp. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911119

AMA Style

Zhao L, Jin X, Xiong Z, Tang H, Guo H, Ye G, Chen D, Yang S, Yin Z, Fu H, et al. The Antivirulence Activity of Umbelliferone and Its Protective Effect against A. hydrophila-Infected Grass Carp. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Ling, Xiaoyu Jin, Ziqian Xiong, Huaqiao Tang, Hongrui Guo, Gang Ye, Defang Chen, Shiyong Yang, Zhongqiong Yin, Hualin Fu, and et al. 2022. "The Antivirulence Activity of Umbelliferone and Its Protective Effect against A. hydrophila-Infected Grass Carp" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop