Next Article in Journal
The Antennal Pathway of Dragonfly Nymphs, from Sensilla to the Brain
Previous Article in Journal
Prior Experience with Food Reward Influences the Behavioral Responses of the Honeybee Apis mellifera and the Bumblebee Bombus lantschouensis to Tomato Floral Scent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Nitrogen on Phosphine-Susceptible and -Resistant Populations of Stored Product Insects

by
Maria K. Sakka
1,*,
Fotini Gatzali
2,
Vaios T. Karathanos
2,3 and
Christos G. Athanassiou
1
1
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece
2
Agricultural Cooperatives’ Union of Aeghion, 25100 Aeghion, Greece
3
Department of Nutrition, Harokopion University, 17671 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(12), 885; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11120885
Submission received: 20 October 2020 / Revised: 27 November 2020 / Accepted: 2 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The sawtoothed grain beetle, the red flour beetle and the rice weevil are three major stored product insects that attack different stored products worldwide. Limited chemical options are available, and eco-friendlier management strategies are needed. Low oxygen treatment can be used as an alternative method to limit chemical treatments. Therefore, we conducted nine trials in commercial nitrogen chambers with phosphine susceptible and resistant populations. The vials with insects were placed in different locations inside the chambers and mortality was recorded after the termination of each trial. The vials were kept at laboratory conditions for 65 days in order to measure progeny production. Low or no survival was recorded in all cases for all species. Moreover, progeny production was suppressed with some exceptions for some species and populations. The current study indicates that low oxygen is effective against phosphine susceptible and resistant populations and can be used as alternative method to chemicals.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated nitrogen treatment on phosphine-resistant field and -susceptible laboratory populations of different stored product beetles. Nine trials were conducted in commercial nitrogen chambers with the O2 level set at 1.0%. Two different temperatures—i.e., 28 and 40 °C—and three exposure intervals—i.e., 2.5, 3 and 9 d—were used in our tests. Adults of the sawtoothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae); the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae); and the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) were used in the trials. The insects were placed in vials with different commodities per species and population, and their mortality was measured after the termination of each trial. Then, the vials were kept in incubator chambers at 25 °C and 65% relative humidity for 65 d to measure progeny production. Complete parental mortality was observed in all cases for O. surinamensis and S. oryzae, but there was some survival for T. castaneum at 28 °C and 3 d of exposure. In general, progeny production was completely (100%) suppressed, with some exceptions for all species and populations. The results indicate that low oxygen is effective for all species tested, regardless of their resistance status to phosphine, and can be further adopted as an alternative method to mitigate resistance in stored product beetles.

1. Introduction

Phosphine, the most common fumigant in stored product protection, despite its proved efficacy in a wide range of application scenarios, is now facing its bigger challenge: the development of resistance by many stored product insect populations in several parts of the world [1]. Major stored product insects such as the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostryhidae); the rusty grain beetle, Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae); and the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) were found to be resistant to phosphine [1,2,3,4]. The increase in resistance populations worldwide necessitates the need for the use of alternative methods, either as standalone applications or as “resistance breakers” under a rotation concept with phosphine [1,4,5,6,7,8]. Controlled atmosphere has been used for control of insects in a number of fresh commodities—e.g., fruits [9].
There are certain methods that have been evaluated as alternatives to phosphine [7]. For example, the utilization of contact insecticides has been proven to be effective for the control of populations that are resistant to phosphine, while several studies document the absence of cross resistance [10,11]. Recently, Agrafioti et al. [8] reported that heat treatment could be a viable method for the control of phosphine-resistant insect populations. Additional methods that have been proved effective for this purpose in laboratory and field trials are ozone [12] and the fumigant sulfuryl fluoride [13]. All of the above can be used in a phosphine resistance mitigation strategy in different types of facilities and commodities. However, phosphine substitution by some of these methods may not always be feasible, due to the different characteristics of each application scenario. For instance, heat is usually applied in empty spaces in food and processing facilities, and not directly on the commodity, which leaves a certain application gap there in terms of phosphine replacement. Similarly, contact insecticides can substitute for phosphine on raw grains where they can be applied directly as grain protectants, but cannot be used in processed commodities, such as bags of flour or pallets of pasta.
Controlled atmospheres are based on low oxygen environment which kills insects, through oxygen (O2) replacement with another gas. Elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels cause spiracles to open resulting in insect death from anoxia/hypoxia. Controlled atmospheres by using carbon dioxide has direct toxic effects on the insect nervous system, and causes acidification in the hemolymph and failure of membrane in insect tissues [14]. Ofuya and Reichmuth [15] emphasized the importance and the wide applicability of modified atmospheres as environmentally friendly and economically feasible methods that can be further utilized at the post-harvest stages of agricultural commodities. In most cases, reduction in the oxygen level is achieved through the increase in the levels of either nitrogen or carbon dioxide [16], with nitrogen becoming more popular during recent years [14,17,18]. Nitrogen is approximately 78% in the atmosphere and can be easily elevated in a target facility through nitrogen generators or pumps that are able to take the nitrogen from the air and introduce the gas in the area that is to be treated [19,20]. In such an application, the oxygen level is usually kept at 1% or less [21]. Athanassiou et al. [18] tested nitrogen in commercial chambers and found that the increase in the temperature during the application from 28 to 38–43 °C increased the efficacy of the method and sufficiently shortened its application period. In that study, the authors found that the use of nitrogen under increased temperatures could successfully control different life stages of the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae); the tobacco moth, Ephestia elutella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae); and Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) [18]. The use of atmospheric nitrogen can be implemented in different types of facilities, ranging from chambers to large silos [14,15,16].
Considering the above and taking into account the wide applicability of nitrogen in stored product protection, there are no data available for the utilization of nitrogen for the control of insects that are resistant to phosphine. Although nitrogen and phosphine have different modes of action, both act through the insect respiration system, so it is unclear if there are certain interactions that may affect the efficacy of this method. It is now well established that, for some species, phosphine resistant individuals have modified their respiration parameters, as compared with the susceptible individuals [22]. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of nitrogen treatment on insect populations with different susceptibility to phosphine. For this purpose, one internal grain feeder, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and two external grain-feeders, T. castaneum and O. surinamensis, were selected.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Insects

The test insects used were reared at the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology (LEAZ), Department of Agriculture, Crop Protection and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, at 25 °C, 65% relative humidity (r.h.) and continuous darkness. For all beetle species, adult beetles <1 month old were used in the tests. For O. surinamensis, T. castaneum and S. oryzae, the rearing media were oats, wheat flour and whole wheat kernels, respectively. For each of the above species, the standard laboratory populations (LB) were used, as well as field populations, namely for O. surinamensis Def, T. castaneum QTC931 and S. oryzae 3Tusc. All laboratory populations were collected from Greece and maintained in LEAZ for more than 20 years, while O. surinamensis Def, T. castaneum QTC931 and S. oryzae 3Tusc were collected from Spain, Australia and Italy, respectively, and reared in LEAZ since 2017.

2.2. Detection of Phosphine Resistance

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) protocol, as described by the FAO Plant Protection Bulletin (FAO 1975), and modified by Agrafioti et al. [8], was used for the evaluation of the occurrence of phosphine resistance for each population. In brief, twenty adults of each of the tested species and populations were placed in a 1.5 L glass jar and exposed to phosphine concentration of 30 ppm for 20 h. After the termination of the exposure interval, active—i.e., capable of coordinated movement—and immobilized—i.e., not capable of coordinated movement—adults were recorded, as described by Athanassiou et al. [23]. The whole procedure was repeated three times (three replicates), with three sub-replicates each, with new phosphine production on each replicate, as suggested by Agrafioti et al. [8].

2.3. Nitrogen Treatment

The trials were conducted in a commercial facility (Agricultural Cooperatives’ Union of Aeghion S.A.) between May 2018 and October 2019. Nine trials were conducted inside nitrogen chambers (length 17 m, width 3.95 m, high 2.90 m) (AgroSpeCom Ltd., Thessaloniki, Greece), in which nitrogen was introduced through an incorporated nitrogen generator (Ali 4100). High purity nitrogen (99.0% N2 and 1.0% O2) was produced from air through a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process and pumped inside the chambers at a maximum flow rate of 72 m3/h. Each chamber was filled with eight pallets carrying boxes of packed currants (Vitis vinifera vinifera L. var. Apyrena, each pallet contained 64 boxes of 12.5 kg each) (Figure 1) The dimension of each pallet was 1.60 in high, 0.80 in width and 1.20 in length. Based on a previous study [18], we selected different conditions for each trial (temperature, exposure time) which are presented in Table 1.
From each species and population (susceptible and resistant), insects were placed in plastic vials (3 cm in diameter, 8 cm in high, Rotilabo Sample tins Snap on lid, Carl Roth, Germany) for the trials (3 species × 2 populations × 3 replicates = 18 vials per location per pallet). The vials were perforated in the upper part. Two days before each trial, adults were taken from the cultures and ten individuals from each insect species and population were placed in the vials and were maintained in incubators at 25 °C, 65% r.h. Each vial was filled with 10 g of oat flakes for O. surinamensis, flour for T. castaneum and wheat kernels for S. oryzae. The series of vials were placed in four different pallets inside each chamber, with 4 different locations in each pallet—i.e., at the center of the pallets, at the upper part of the pallets and under the pallets (for distribution in each trial, see Figure 1, Table 1). For each species, there were three replicates in each location. A separate series of vials was placed outside of the chamber and used as controls.
After the termination of each trial, the chamber was opened, and all vials were transferred to the laboratory for assessment of adult mortality. All adults (dead and alive) were removed, and the vials were kept in incubators set at 25 °C, 65% r.h. and in continuous darkness. Observations on adult progeny were recorded after 65 days.

2.4. Data Analysis

All data, separately for each trial, insect species and population were subjected to an independent t-test, with insect mortality as the response variable. To determine the effect of location for each trial and insect species, data were subjected to a one-way ANOVA with insect mortality as the response variable and location as the main effect. Control mortality was generally low, so the data for control mortality were not used in the analysis. The same analysis approach was also followed in the case of progeny production counts. Means were separated by using the Student’s t-test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Detection of Phosphine Resistance

Regarding the susceptible populations (LB) of all species, no active adults were found after the 20 h of exposure at 30 ppm. In contrast, for the field populations, survival was 100% after the termination of the exposure interval for O. surinamensis Def, T. castaneum QTC931 and S. oryzae 3Tusc.

3.2. Insect Mortality and Progeny Production

Control mortality of parental adults was negligible (<4% for all species). For all populations tested, complete control of the parental adults was achieved at all nitrogen trials for both laboratory and field populations of O. surinamensis and S. oryzae (results are not presented, 100% mortality), with the exception of T. castaneum LB and T. castaneum QTC931 in trials 3 and 5, respectively, which were carried out at either 28 °C and 3 d or 28 °C and 9 d (Table 2). No significant differences were noted among locations for the two populations of T. castaneum (Table 2).
Regarding progeny production in the control vials, this was 95.0 ± 38.7, 109.8 ± 17.6, 47.8 ± 12.5, 48.6 ± 6.2, 108.7 ± 17.9 and 143.7 ± 18.8 adults per vial for O. surinamensis LB, O. surinamensis Def, T. castaneum LB, T. castaneum QTC931, S. oryzae LB and S. oryzae 3Tusc, respectively. Progeny production was extremely low for O. surinamensis LB and progeny production was completely suppressed for O. surinamensis Def (Table 3). Progeny production was recorded for T. castaneum LB only in one location in trial 3 at 28 °C for 3 days. Moreover, for T. castaneum QTC931, the progeny production of which was recorded only in trial 6 at 28 °C for 3 d (Table 4). For some locations, progeny production of both populations of S. oryzae was high, but only in trial 2, which was performed at 28 °C for 3 d (Table 5). Moreover, significant differences were noted among locations only in the case of trial 2 and only for S. oryzae 3Tusc (Table 5).

4. Discussion

Considering the literature available, this is the first study that describes the insecticidal effect of nitrogen against phosphine susceptible and resistant populations. Our data clearly indicate that nitrogen treatment can be used successfully for the control of major stored product insects that are resistant to phosphine. Based on our results, resistant populations of O. surinamensis, T. castaneum and S. oryzae are highly susceptible to nitrogen, at the temperatures and exposure levels tested here. The current results stand in accordance with the data previously reported by Athanassiou et al. [18] for stored currants, indicating that complete control is achievable at intervals that are shorter than 7 days, provided that nitrogen is applied in combination with elevated temperatures. Moreover, in that study, the authors noted such an application did not affect the basic properties of the commodity, and, to some extent, nitrogen reduced mold density [18].
The overall progeny production was much lower at longer exposures, than at short ones. In the same way, progeny production was recorded at 28 °C, but not at 40 °C. Considering the significant effect of temperature in shortening the duration of the application, and taking into account that the commodity is not affected [18], shorter application times are feasible and can be further implemented in “real world” modified atmosphere applications. The “traditional” protocols of the application of nitrogen that have been proposed during recent decades suggest exposure intervals that are 7 days or longer [24]. In addition to this interval, the operator must consider some additional days that are required to reach the target of 1% oxygen, which makes the overall duration of the application at least 10 days, and in many cases much longer. This constitutes nitrogen a long-lasting application, that requires application times that are much longer than those of the typical methods that are used for the disinfestations of durable commodities, such as phosphine [25]. The increase in temperatures is not feasible in the application of nitrogen in large facilities, such as silos [19], but can be easily controlled in chambers [18]. Our experiments show that temperature is maybe equally important as exposure. Elevated temperatures drastically increase insect stress, even if applied alone, affecting different mechanisms, such as water loss and membrane disorders [26,27]. In this context, even if applied alone, heat can effectively control insects in different types of storage and processing facilities [28,29,30].
Apart from testing parental individuals, progeny production capacity of the populations was tested. In many studies on aerial insecticides, the efficacy trials are focused on using parental adults, which may provide a false impression that the application was successful, given that for many species, adult is the most susceptible life stage [31,32]. In addition, laboratory handling to provide the individuals that are to be exposed is likely to cause an additional stress/damage, especially in the case of eggs, which may give eventually high mortality levels that do not correspond to “real world” applications. In an earlier study with a commercial fumigation with phosphine, Aulicky et al. [33] exposed adults of T. confusum that were left to oviposit in flour for some interval before the initiation of the application, and, despite the fact that the application was effective for the parental adults, immature emergence was recorded in the commodity. The same approach was used in the current trials, and we saw that, despite its high efficacy, the method did not totally suppress progeny production in all combinations tested. Moreover, the specific vials where progeny production was recorded were the same ones where parental mortality was complete, suggesting that even a short oviposition period prior to death can support a post-exposure infestation. From a practical point of view, the utilization in similar commercial trials of small product quantities that all life stages may coexist could be a more realistic approach than separating eggs and immatures before the initiation of the application [33].
We selected the level of 1% of oxygen, considering its efficacy, based on previous works [14,16,17,18]. In fact, oxygen levels that were lower than 1% may not necessarily result in faster mortality levels. Navarro [16] reported that complete mortality of S. oryzae was achieved faster at 1% than at 0.1 or 2% oxygen under the same conditions. Higher oxygen levels, however, are also lethal, but variations among life stages may be more diverse. Tunc and Navarro [34] noted that complete mortality of T. confusum eggs was achieved at 2–4% oxygen in contrast with adults which survived to 4% oxygen for 96 h. For the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae), Vassilakos et al. [35] found that adults of this species were more susceptible to conditions of low oxygen than to elevated carbon dioxide.
The survival/progeny patterns noted here were not correlated with the phosphine resistance level of the populations tested, and hence, nitrogen was effective regardless of the population. In this regard, nitrogen, at the conditions evaluated here, can be used effectively in programs and strategies that deal with phosphine resistance mitigation measures. As controlled atmospheres can be applied directly on the commodity, nitrogen may be considered as a method that can be rotated with phosphine, or even used as a standalone treatment. At the same time, the use of this method at elevated temperatures (e.g., 40 °C), provided that there are no negative interactions with the commodity, can be effective for the control of resistant populations at intervals that are directly comparable with commercial phosphine applications.

5. Conclusions

The findings of the present study illustrate that low oxygen can be an effective alternative method against phosphine-susceptible and -resistant populations of O. surinamensis, T. castaneum and S. oryzae. Moreover, temperature and duration of application are critical for the effective control of these species. Progeny production was lower at longer exposures than at shorter ones. The conditions that were tested here can be used in pest management strategies in order to mitigate phosphine resistance. Finally, low oxygen could be a variable tool in pest management strategies for ensuring control of major stored product insects that are resistant to phosphine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.A. and M.K.S.; methodology, C.G.A. and M.K.S.; validation C.G.A., M.K.S., V.T.K. and F.G.; formal analysis, M.K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.A. and M.K.S.; writing—review and editing, C.G.A., M.K.S., V.T.K. and F.G.; visualization C.G.A. and M.K.S.; supervision C.G.A.; project administration C.G.A.; funding acquisition C.G.A. and V.T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under the HFRI PhD Fellowship grant (GA. No. 891). Moreover, this research was co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH–CREATE–INNOVATE (project code: Τ1ΕΔΚ-04326).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nayak, M.K.; Daglish, G.J.; Phillips, T.W.; Ebert, P.R. Resistance to the Fumigant Phosphine and Its Management in Insect Pests of Stored Products: A Global Perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 333–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jagadeesan, R.; Collins, P.J.; Daglish, G.J.; Ebert, P.R.; Schlipalius, D.I. Phosphine resistance in the rust red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Inheritance, gene interactions and fitness costs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nayak, M.K.; Holloway, J.C.; Emery, R.N.; Pavic, H.; Bartlet, J.; Collins, P.J. Strong resistance to phosphine in the rusty grain beetle, Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae): Its characterisation, a rapid assay for diagnosis and its distribution in Australia. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Z.; Schlipalius, D.; Opit, G.; Subramanyam, B.; Phillips, T.W. Diagnostic Molecular Markers for Phosphine Resistance in U.S. Populations of Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Koçak, E.; Schlipalius, D.I.; Kaur, R.; Tuck, A.; Ebert, P.; Collins, P.; Yilmaz, A. Determining phosphine resistance in rust red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) populations from Turkey. Turk. J. Entomol. 2015, 39, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sakka, M.; Riga, M.; Vontas, J.; Gotze, C.; Allegra, J.G.; Jakob, G.; Athanassiou, C.G. Evaluation of tolerance/resistance to phosphine of stored product beetle populations from Europe, by using different diagnostic methods. In Proceedings of the 12th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection (IWCSPP), Berlin, Germany, 7–11 October 2018; Adler, C.S., Opit, G., Fürstenau, B., Eds.; Julius Kühn-Institut: Dresden, Germany; Volume 1, pp. 1008–1013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Athanassiou, C.G.; Arthur, F.H. (Eds.) Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Nayak, M. Detection of phosphine resistance in major stored-product insects in Greece and evaluation of a field resistance test kit. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 82, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hallman, G.J. Controlled atmospheres. In Insect Pests and Fresh Horticultural Products: Treatments and Responses; Paull, R.E., III, Armstrong, J.W., Eds.; CAB: Wallingford, UK, 1994; pp. 121–138. [Google Scholar]
  10. Attia, F.I. Multiple and cross-resistance characteristics in phosphine-resistant strains of Rhyzopertha dominica and Tribolium castaneum. In Developments in Agricultural Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 5, pp. 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  11. Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Insecticidal effect of contact insecticides against stored product beetle populations with different susceptibility to phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2018, 79, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sousa, A.D.; Faroni, L.D.A.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Tótola, M.; Urruchi, W.I. Ozone as a management alternative against phosphine-resistant insect pests of stored products. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jagadeesan, R.; Nayak, M.K.; Pavic, H.; Chandra, K.; Collins, P.J. Susceptibility to sulfuryl fluoride and lack of cross-resistance to phosphine in developmental stages of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Navarro, S. The use of modified and controlled atmospheres for the disinfestation of stored products. J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 301–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ofuya, T.I.; Reichmuth, C. Effect of combining or alternating hypercabia and anoxia conditions on mortality of two bruchids infesting grain legumes in storage. In Entomology in the Nigerian Economy: Research Focus in the 21st Century; Lale, N.E.S., Molta, N.B., Donli, P.O., Dike, M.C., Aminu-Kano, M., Eds.; Entomological Society of Nigeria: Maiduguri, Nigeria, 1998; Volume 31, pp. 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  16. Navarro, S. Modified Atmospheres for the Control of Stored-Product Insects and Mites. In Insect Management for Food Storage and Processing, 2nd ed.; Heaps, J.W., Ed.; AACC International: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2006; pp. 105–146. [Google Scholar]
  17. Adler, C.; Corinth, H.G.; Reichmuth, C. Modified atmospheres. In Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM; Subramanyam, B., Hagstrum, D.W., Eds.; Kluwer: Boston, MA, USA, 2000; pp. 105–146. [Google Scholar]
  18. Athanassiou, C.G.; Chiou, A.; Rumbos, C.I.; Sotiroudas, V.; Sakka, M.; Nikolidaki, E.K.; Panagopoulou, E.A.; Kouvelas, A.; Katechaki, E.; Karathanos, V.T. Effect of nitrogen in combination with elevated temperatures on insects, microbes and organoleptic characteristics of stored currants. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Navarro, S.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Varnava, A.; Vroom, N.; Yiassoumis, D.; Leandrou, I.; Hadjioannou, S. Control of stored grain insects using nitrogen in large concrete silos in Cyprus. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Controlled Atmospheres and Fumigation in Stored Products, Antalya, Turkey, 15–19 October 2012; ARBER Professional: Ankara, Turkey, 2012; pp. 478–487. [Google Scholar]
  20. Navarro, S.; Timlick, B.; Demianyk, C.J.; White, N.D.G. Controlled or modified atmospheres. In Stored Product Protection; Hagstrum, D.W., Phillips, T.W., Cuperus, G., Eds.; Publication No. S156; Kansas State Research and Extension: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jay, E.G.; Cuff, W. Weight loss and mortality of three life stages of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) when exposed to four modified atmospheres. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1981, 17, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Collins, P.J.; Schlipalius, D.I. Insecticide Resistance. In Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection; Athanassiou, C., Arthur, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 169–182. [Google Scholar]
  23. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Brabec, D.L.; Agrafioti, P.; Sakka, M.; Campbell, J.F. Using immobilization as a quick diagnostic indicator for resistance to phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 82, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Annis, P.C. Towards rational controlled atmosphere dosage schedules—A review of the current knowledge. In Proceedings of the 4th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, Tel Aviv, Israel, 21–26 September 1986; Donahaye, J., Navarro, S., Eds.; Maor-Wallach Press: Jerusalem, Israel, 1987; pp. 128–148. [Google Scholar]
  25. Athanassiou, C.G.; Chiou, A.; Rumbos, C.I.; Karagiannis, A.; Nikolidaki, E.; Panagopoulou, E.; Kouvelas, A.; Karathanos, V.T. Effects of electric infrared heating with light source penetration on microbial and entomological loads on dried currants and their organoleptic characteristics. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Denlinger, D.L.; Yocum, G.D. Physiology of heat sensitivity. In Temperature Sensitivity in Insects and Application in Integrated Pest Management; Westview Press Oxford: Oxford, UK, 1998; Volume 29. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fields, P.G.; White, N.D.G. Alternatives to Methyl Bromide Treatments for Stored-Product and Quarantine Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 331–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Dean, G.A. Heat as a Means of Controlling Mill Insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 1911, 4, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dean, G.A. Further Data on Heat as a Means of Controlling Mill Insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 1913, 6, 40–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hagstrum, D.W.; Subramanyam, B. Fundamentals of Stored-Product Entomology; AACC International: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2006; pp. 1–323. [Google Scholar]
  31. Athanassiou, C.G.; Phillips, T.W.; Aikins, M.J.; Hasan, M.M.; Throne, J.E. Effectiveness of sulfuryl fluoride for control of different life stages of stored-product psocids (Psocoptera). J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Venkidusamy, M.; Jagadeesan, R.; Nayak, M.K.; Subbarayalu, M.; Subramaniam, C.; Collins, P.J. Relative tolerance and expression of resistance to phosphine in life stages of the rusty grain beetle, Cryptolestes ferrugineus. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Aulicky, R.; Stejskal, V.; Frydova, B. Field validation of phopshine efficacy on the first recorded resistant strains of Sitophilus granarius and Tribolium castaneum from the Czech Republic. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 81, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tunc, I.; Navarro, S. Sensitivity of tribolium castaneum eggs to modified atmospheres. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1983, 34, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vassilakos, T.N.; Riudavets, J.; Castañé, C.; Iturralde-Garcia, R.D.; Athanassiou, C.G. Efficacy of Modified Atmospheres on Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 2450–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of the pallets (left) inside the chamber (with «P» are the pallets in which insect vials were placed) and locations in each pallet in which vials with insects were placed (upper, inside and under the pallet). Black color indicates the legs of the pallet (right).
Figure 1. Distribution of the pallets (left) inside the chamber (with «P» are the pallets in which insect vials were placed) and locations in each pallet in which vials with insects were placed (upper, inside and under the pallet). Black color indicates the legs of the pallet (right).
Insects 11 00885 g001
Table 1. Distribution of the vials with insects in the pallets (at the center of the pallets, at the upper part of the pallets and under the pallets), along with the conditions for each trial. Locations were slightly varied from trial to trial based on accessibility criteria.
Table 1. Distribution of the vials with insects in the pallets (at the center of the pallets, at the upper part of the pallets and under the pallets), along with the conditions for each trial. Locations were slightly varied from trial to trial based on accessibility criteria.
Trial NumberTemperature/ExposureLocation 1Location 2Location 3Location 4
Trial 128 °C, 3 dInsideUnderUpperInside
Trial 228 °C, 3 dInsideUnderUpperInside
Τrial 328 °C, 3 dInsideUnderUpperInside
Trial 428 °C, 9 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Trial 528 °C, 9 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Trial 628 °C, 9 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Trial 740 °C, 2.5 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Trial 840 °C, 2.5 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Trial 940 °C, 2.5 dInsideInsideUpperUnder
Table 2. Mean mortality (± SE) of two populations of T. castaneum (LB, QTC931), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Table 2. Mean mortality (± SE) of two populations of T. castaneum (LB, QTC931), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Trial NumberT. castaneum LBT. castaneum QTC931
L1L2L3L4L1L2L3L4
Trial 1100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 2100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 396.7 ± 3.396.7 ± 3.3100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 4100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 5100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.096.7 ± 3.3100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 6100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 7100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 8100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
Trial 9100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
No significant differences were noted between the two populations within each trial (t-test at 0.05). No significant differences were noted among locations in each trial (HSD test at 0.05).
Table 3. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of O. surinamensis (LB, Def), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Table 3. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of O. surinamensis (LB, Def), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Trial NumberO. surinamensis LBO. surinamensis Def
L1L2L3L4L1L2L3L4
Trial 10.0 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.70.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 20.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 30.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 40.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 50.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 60.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 70.3 ± 0.30.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 80.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.7 ± 0.70.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 90.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
No significant differences were noted between the two populations within each trial (t-test at 0.05). No significant differences were noted among locations in each trial (HSD test at 0.05).
Table 4. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of T. castaneum (LB, QTC931), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Table 4. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of T. castaneum (LB, QTC931), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Trial NumberT. castaneum LBT. castaneum QTC931
L1L2L3L4L1L2L3L4
Trial 10.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 20.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 320.3 ± 20.30.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 40.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 50.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 60.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 4.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 70.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 80.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 90.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
No significant differences were noted between the two populations within each trial (t-test at 0.05). No significant differences were noted among locations in each trial (HSD test at 0.05).
Table 5. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of S. oryzae (LB, 3Tusc), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Table 5. Progeny production (mean number of adults ± SE/vial) in vials containing parental adults of two populations of S. oryzae (LB, 3Tusc), with different susceptibility to phosphine, exposed to nitrogen in nine different trials (for conditions for each trial, see Table 1). For each trial, vials with insects were placed in four different locations (L1–L4, see Table 1).
Trial NumberS. oryzae LBS. oryzae 3Tusc
L1L2L3L4L1L2L3L4
Trial 10.0 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.30.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.30.0 ± 0.0
Trial 294.0 ± 43.6A0.0 ± 0.0B0.0 ± 0.0B0.0 ± 0.0B162.0 ± 39.1A0.0 ± 0.0B0.0 ± 0.0B0.0 ± 0.0B
Trial 30.0 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.30.0 ± 0.01.0 ± 0.60.0 ± 0.00.3 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.6
Trial 40.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 50.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 60.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 70.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 80.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Trial 90.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
Where no letters exist, no significant differences were noted between the two populations within each trial (t-test at 0.05). Μeans followed by the same uppercase do not differ significantly among locations in each trial and population; where no letters exist, no significant differences were noted (HSD test at 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakka, M.K.; Gatzali, F.; Karathanos, V.T.; Athanassiou, C.G. Effect of Nitrogen on Phosphine-Susceptible and -Resistant Populations of Stored Product Insects. Insects 2020, 11, 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11120885

AMA Style

Sakka MK, Gatzali F, Karathanos VT, Athanassiou CG. Effect of Nitrogen on Phosphine-Susceptible and -Resistant Populations of Stored Product Insects. Insects. 2020; 11(12):885. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11120885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakka, Maria K., Fotini Gatzali, Vaios T. Karathanos, and Christos G. Athanassiou. 2020. "Effect of Nitrogen on Phosphine-Susceptible and -Resistant Populations of Stored Product Insects" Insects 11, no. 12: 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11120885

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop