Next Article in Journal
Soft Computing of a Medically Important Arthropod Vector with Autoregressive Recurrent and Focused Time Delay Artificial Neural Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Preempting the Arrival of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys: Biological Control Options for Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Community Structure, Biodiversity and Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) Using Malaise Traps on the Highest Mountain in Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modelling the Potential Geographic Distribution of Two Trissolcus Species for the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/insects12060505
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Native and Non-Native Egg Parasitoids Associated with Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys [Stål, 1855]; Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Western Slovenia

by
Mojca Rot
1,*,
Lara Maistrello
2,
Elena Costi
2,
Iris Bernardinelli
3,
Giorgio Malossini
3,
Luca Benvenuto
3 and
Stanislav Trdan
4
1
Institute of Agriculture and Forestry Nova Gorica, Pri hrastu 18, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
3
ERSA—Regional Agency for Rural Development—Plant Health Service, 33050 Pozzuolo del Friuli, Italy
4
Department of Agronomy, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(6), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060505
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 26 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control of Halyomorpha halys with Special Emphasis on Parasitoids)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Halyomorpha halys, the brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), is an invasive pest causing serious damage to agricultural production. Managing this pest species is challenging because of its wide host range and lack of effective control measures. Biological control of H. halys through natural enemies seems to be the most environmentally friendly and sustainable solution. Extensive knowledge of the native egg parasitoid fauna is needed prior to the introduction of a biological control program. The main purpose of the study, carried out in the Goriška region of Western Slovenia, was to detect egg parasitoid species associated with H. halys and to evaluate their impact on the pest population under local environmental conditions. High species richness was identified during the study, and five egg-parasitoids were recorded for the first time in Slovenia. The native species Anastatus bifasciatus dominated in urban and suburban areas, while the non-native Trissolcus mitsukurii prevailed in agricultural areas. Rapid recruitment of native parasitoids, the presence of an effective alien parasitoid species in the region and increasing overall parasitism rates are very encouraging results and valuable information for future activities regarding the biological control of H. halys in Slovenia.

Abstract

Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), native to East Asia, has become a globally invasive pest, as a serious threat to agricultural production and a notorious nuisance pest in urban areas. Considerable efforts have been made so far to develop effective pest control measures to prevent crop damage. Biological control of this invasive stink bug by egg parasitoids has proven to be the most environmentally sustainable long-term solution. Knowledge of the native egg parasitoid fauna is of key importance when implementing a biological control program. Therefore, the main objective of our study was to detect egg parasitoid species associated with H. halys in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) and to evaluate their impact on the pest population under field conditions. In the years 2019 and 2020, around 4600 H. halys eggs were collected in the wild and more than 3400 sentinel eggs were exposed to detect parasitoids in the field. Five egg-parasitoid species emerged from H. halys eggs: Anastatus bifasciatus (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), Telenomus sp., Trissolcus basalis, Trissolcus mitsukurii (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), all of them are new records for Slovenia. The native species, An. bifasciatus, dominated in urban and suburban areas, while non-native Tr. mitsukurii prevailed in agricultural areas. Overall parasitism rates of naturally laid eggs by the parasitoid species complex in 2019 and 2020 was 3.0 and 14.4%, respectively. Rapid recruitment of native parasitoids, early detection of an effective alien parasitoid species and increasing overall parasitism rates are very encouraging results, which need to be followed and verified in future research.

1. Introduction

The brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) (Halyomorpha halys (Stål); Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) is an East Asian species, native to Japan, Korea, China and Taiwan [1]. This polyphagous species, with more than 100 host plants reported [2], has become a worldwide invasive pest, causing severe damage in agricultural production [1,3,4,5,6,7]. In the mid-1990s, it was introduced into Pennsylvania (USA) [3], and within a few years, it rapidly spread across the United States and Canada [8]. The same scenario of invasion occurred after its introduction in Europe in 2004 [9]. In 15 years, H. halys managed to colonize almost all climatically suitable areas in Europe [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and became one of the most serious agriculture pests, as well as a nuisance insect in urban environments [23]. Due to the damage caused by H. halys and subsequent economic losses, the use of insecticides has substantially increased in commercial orchards [24], disrupting established integrated pest management programs for different crops in the USA and Europe [25,26,27]. More frequent pesticide application, including broad-spectrum insecticides, has affected beneficial arthropods and caused secondary pest outbreaks [27]. Halyomorpha halys management has become a great concern and challenge for European farmers. Italy was the first European country to suffer great damage in agriculture production due to attacks of this invasive pest. In 2019 estimated losses in fruit production in Northern Italy were almost 600 million EUR [28].
Many research groups and technicians around the world have been working feverishly over the last 10 years to find effective, feasible and environmentally acceptable ways of managing this pest. Exclusion nets have proven to be a promising tool to prevent H. halys from damaging nectarines and apples in Italy. Although they are expensive to purchase and deploy, the use of such nets is considered to be a cost-effective control strategy [29]. The attract-and-kill strategy was effective at managing low to moderate H. halys populations in apple orchards in Mid-Atlantic states in the USA [26]. Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) were tested in pear orchards in Central Italy. Although the method was not proven for H. halys control itself, it is proposed as part of an IPM program, which contributes to a significant reduction of pest population in the crop [30].
In past years, much attention has been given to alternative methods for long-term management. Biological control of H. halys with egg parasitoids is considered one of the most viable long-term solutions [24]. In its native range, H. halys is primarily regulated by several egg parasitoids belonging to genera Trissolcus Ashmead, Telenomus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), Ooencyrtus Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Anastatus Motschoulsky (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) [31,32]. Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) is the most predominant and effective parasitoid in China, with high parasitism rates ranging from 50% to 90%, while Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) is the main parasitoid in Japan [1,31,32]. Numerous studies on natural enemies have been carried out in the USA and Europe [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Overall findings show that three principal groups of hymenopteran parasitoids are able to attack H. halys eggs in invaded areas: Scelionidae (Telenomus, Trissolcus, and Gryon spp.), Eupelmidae (Anastatus spp.), and Encyrtidae (Ooencyrtus spp.). However, so far, the level of parasitism by native species is too low to reduce pest population below economic thresholds [34,39]. Anastatus bifasciatus (Geoffroy) is the most widespread native egg parasitoid in Europe capable of developing on viable H. halys eggs [33,36,39,40,41] and is considered as the most suitable candidate for augmentative biological control in Europe. The first findings of adventive populations of Tr. japonicus occurred in Switzerland in 2017 and in Northern Italy in 2018 [42,43], where another important H. halys natural enemy, Tr. mitsukurii, was found in Friuli Venezia Giulia, the northeastern Italian region bordering Slovenia, and have brought new prospects for biological control of H. halys in Europe [43,44].
Native natural enemies of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) are poorly investigated in Slovenia. Among egg parasitoids, the only record is of Trissolcus scutellaris (Thomson) parasitizing eggs of Eurydema ventralis (Kolenati) [45]. Halyomorpha halys was first detected in Western Slovenia in 2017 [22], and since then, it has caused considerable damage to fruit production [46]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify the presence and impact of parasitoids and predators of the eggs of this invasive pest in the region. During the surveys, special attention was paid to habitat investigation in the border area with Italy due to the higher probability of detecting non-native parasitoids of the genus Trissolcus that were recorded there [43,44].

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Field Survey of Native and Non-Native Parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys

Field surveys of parasitoids were carried out in 2019 and 2020 in the Goriška region of Western Slovenia. The monitoring of naturally laid egg masses was performed weekly, from June to the end of September. Locations were selected based on the presence and abundance of H. halys and preferred host plant availability. Different types of locations were inspected: agricultural areas with intensive fruit orchards and row crops, including hedges and shrubs along roads, parks and garden vegetation within urban areas (Table 1). The undersides of leaves were inspected throughout the canopies of trees and shrubs at a height between 0.5 to 2.0 m from the ground. Leaves with naturally laid egg masses were removed and placed in plastic Petri dishes. Data on location, host plant and date of collection were recorded for each egg mass. Samples were marked and transferred to the laboratory. The detailed examination of egg masses was performed under a stereomicroscope. The number of intact eggs and the number of eggs with signs of damage by sucking and chewing predators were counted. Predation damage on eggs was identified and classified according to Morrison et al. [47]. Hatching took place in growth chambers at 25 ± 1 °C, 60% ± 10% r.h. and L16:D8 photoperiod. The emergence of nymphs and parasitoids was recorded every second day, and the emerged nymphs and parasitoids were counted and removed from the Petri dishes. The parasitoids were kept in 96% ethanol until identification. Unhatched eggs were dissected, and eggs containing partially developed parasitoids were classified as parasitized. If the cause of mortality could not be diagnosed, eggs were counted as unhatched. When parasitoids had already emerged in the field, to determine the parasitoid previously contained, shapes of exit holes and meconia were examined and compared to the descriptions of Sabbatini-Peverieri et al. [48,49].

2.2. Laboratory Rearing of Halyomorpha halys and the Field Exposure of Fresh Sentinel Eggs

Adult stink bugs were collected from wild-growing and cultivated host plants in gardens and orchards in the vicinity of Nova Gorica (Western Slovenia) in the first half of May 2019 and 2020. The colonies were kept in ventilated plastic boxes with a solid bottom and mesh windows on all sides. The rearing diet composed of green beans, sunflower seeds, peanuts and pieces of carrots and was changed twice a week. To maintain humidity and provide water, cotton balls soaked in water were placed in the boxes. A layer of white polypropylene row cover was fixed under the mesh lids as an oviposition substrate. Egg masses were collected daily. Field exposure of fresh sentinel eggs was performed in two different locations: (i) suburban areas with hedges and shrubs in proximity to orchards and vineyards; (ii) native hedging close to intensive fruit orchards. Freshly laid egg masses (less than 24 h) were stapled to the underside of the leaves of different wild-growing plants (Cornus sanguinea L., Corylus avellana L., Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch., Acer negundo L., Vitis vinifera L.) and remained exposed for 34 days. In 2019, egg masses were exposed once a week in June and within the first half of July. In 2020 the egg masses were exposed twice a week from the end of May to the end of June and from the end of July to the end of August. Collection and laboratory examination of egg masses followed the same procedure as described in Section 2.1.

2.3. Parasitoid Identification

A Nikon SMZ-2B stereo microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with magnification up to 100× was used for morphological diagnosis. For a detailed examination of the microsculpture, which is essential for the determination of the species level, a spotlight in combination with a Mylar shield was used. Morphological characteristics of antennal sensilla were investigated under a compound microscope Nikon Eclipse Ni-U (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Anastatus bifasciatus was identified according to Askew and Nieves-Aldrey [50] and Peng et al. [51], Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Vassiliev) according to Samra et al. [52] and Triapitsyn et al. [53]. For Telenomus and Trissolcus the following keys were used; Johnson [54,55], Talamas et al. [56,57], Balusu et al. [58], Tortorici et al. [59] and Sabbatini Peverieri et al. [43]. Trissolcus mitsukurii was also compared with samples of Tr. mitsukurii collected in Friuli Venezia Giulia and kindly provided by the Regional Agency for Rural Development (ERSA), Italy.

2.4. Evaluation of Parasitoid Efficiency

Parasitoid efficiency evaluation was performed according to Bin and Vinson [60]. The parasitoid impact or parasitism rate was calculated for each location and year as the number of parasitized eggs over the total number of field-collected eggs (Table 2). Discovery efficiency, which describes parasitoid ability to find egg masses, was calculated as the number of egg masses discovered by the parasitoid over the total number of egg masses. Parasitoid exploitation efficiency was calculated as the number of parasitized eggs over the total number of eggs within the parasitized egg masses. The same evaluation method was applied to sentinel egg masses (Table 3).

3. Results

3.1. Naturally Laid Egg Masses Collected in the Field

In 2019 and 2020, a total of 174 H. halys egg masses were found in 11 different locations (Table 2). In 2019, 19 egg masses were found in total at five different locations and from only one egg mass collected on Vitis vinifera, parasitoids successfully emerged. They were all identified as An. bifasciatus, which were recorded for the first time in Slovenia. In 2020, 155 egg masses were found at 11 different locations.
Among the 316 parasitoid wasps that emerged from the eggs, the most abundant species was An. bifasciatus (213 specimens), representing more than two-thirds of all parasitoids collected in the field. Anastatus bifasciatus was also the most widespread species since it was found at 9 out of 11 locations inspected in Westen Slovenia (Figure 1).
The second most abundant species was the non-native Tr. mitsukurii (77 specimens), collected at three different locations. The other two scelionid parasitoids occurred in smaller numbers: Telenomus sp. was found in two locations, and a single egg mass with Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) was found at another location. All of these scelionids were identified for the first time in Slovenia.
The four egg parasitoids observed in 2020 showed a different seasonal occurrence (Figure 2). While Telenomus sp. and Tr. basalis were observed once in the season, from early to mid-July, An. bifasciatus was present throughout the whole season with two noticeable peaks, in the second half of July and in the second half of August. Trissolcus mitsukurii first appeared in mid to late June in small numbers, and the peak occurred in the second half of August.
In 2020, the overall parasitism rate was 14.4%, noticeably higher than in 2019 (3.0%). The increased impact of parasitoids in 2020 was also confirmed by higher discovery efficiency (27.1%) and a high level of exploitation efficiency (54.5%) (Figure 3). In 2019 and 2020, the overall predation rates were 6.2 and 5.6%, respectively (Table 2).

3.2. Sentinel Egg Masses Exposure

In 2019 and 2020, 131 egg masses (3,456 eggs) were exposed at two different locations. In 2019 (40 egg masses; 1058 eggs), we exposed them in suburban and agricultural areas. The observed parasitoid impact was almost negligible in both locations (Table 3). No parasitoids emerged from the eggs exposed in the suburban area, whereas in the agricultural area, one egg mass was parasitized by Oo. telenomicida, which was detected for the first time in Slovenia. In 2020, 91 egg masses (2417 eggs) were exposed. A total of 107 adult parasitoids emerged from the eggs, with 65% of Tr. mitsukurii and 35% of An. bifasciatus. In the suburban area, the parasitism rate was 6.86%, with Tr. mitsukurii as the most abundant species, followed by An. bifasciatus (Table 3). The discovery and exploitation efficiencies were 28.0% and 24.1%, respectively. All three parasitism efficiency indices were higher compared with the agricultural area (Figure 4).
In the agricultural area, the total parasitism rate was 1.39%, and only An. bifasciatus was found (15 adults). In both years, predators demonstrated a greater impact on sentinel egg masses (ranging from 13.9% in 2019 to 15.7% in 2020) than parasitoids (Table 3).

3.3. Oviposition Hosts

During the survey, a total of 22 H. halys oviposition hosts were recorded (Figure 5). Malus domestica Borkh., Actinidia deliciosa (A.Chev.) C.F.Liang & A.R.Ferguson, Olea europea L., Corylus avellana, Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm.f.) Nakai and Zea mays L. were the most common oviposition hosts in the agricultural area. Among the fruit crops, apple was the main host, with 41 egg masses collected, almost a quarter of all H. halys egg masses collected in the region (Figure 5).
The parasitoid community associated with apple was composed of An. bifasciatus and Tr. mitsukurii in equal proportions, with an overall parasitism rate of 8.6%. The second was an olive tree with 24 egg masses collected and with a noticeably higher overall parasitism rate (15.3%) than found on the apple (Table S1. Anastatus bifasciatus was the predominant species and a major contributor to the total parasitism on olives, while Tr. mitsukurii had a minor part. The overall parasitism rate in agricultural areas was 9.7% (Figure 6).
The most suitable oviposition hosts in the urban area were Catalpa bignonioides Walter and Acer platanoides L., where 20.8% of the eggs were parasitized by An. bifasciatus (Figure 7). Host plant diversity and parasitoid species richness were the highest in the suburban area, where An. bifasciatus and Tr. mitsukurii were the most abundant species, while Telenomus sp. and Tr. basalis together represented approximately one-tenth of the total population. Most of the parasitized eggs were found on O. europea, A. deliciosa, P. domestica and P. tomentosa. Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch. is a good H. halys oviposition host but is apparently not attractive to parasitoids.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In a two-year field survey conducted in 2019 and 2020 in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia), we identified the presence of different egg parasitoids of the invasive H. halys, including one non-European species. Halyomorpha halys naturally laid eggs were parasitized by An. bifascatus, Tr. mitsukurii, Tr. basalis and Telenomus sp. In addition, An. bifasciatus, Tr. mitsukurii and Oo. telenomicida successfully emerged from sentinel eggs exposed in the field. All of the five parasitoid species found during the survey are new records for Slovenia. Anastatus bifasciatus was the predominant and most abundant native species parasitizing H. halys eggs in the field, as already noted in previous European studies [36,37,38]. Egg parasitoids of the genus Anastatus were reported as the dominant native parasitoids in the United States [34,61] and in the native range of H. halys in China [32], where they are a part of the natural parasitoid community.
In 2020 the non-native parasitoid Tr. mitsukurii was found for the first time in Europe, and the discovery of this species in Western Slovenia is likely related to the range expansion of the species from the neighboring Italian region of Friuli Venezia Giulia [43,44]. Apparently, Tr. mitsukurii has followed the same pattern of introduction and spread in the region as its host [22]. Regularly invaders leave behind 75% or more of the parasite and pathogen species from their native range [62]. Nevertheless, it seems that the H. halys introduction provided some invasion opportunity for parasitoids from its native range. This phenomenon is particularly evident in species of Trissolcus, which have shown the growing trend in tracking their invasive host in recent years [43].
The dispersal of parasitoids from their native range can be accelerated by repeated introductions of the host species [63]. Although Tr. japonicus adventive populations during this study have not been detected in the region, it can be expected that this species will also expand into Slovenia in the near future. Bioclimatic envelope models predict that Tr. japonicus will follow its host throughout Europe, spreading within regions most suitable for its settlement located in southwestern France, northeastern Spain, northern Italy, western Slovenia and Croatia [64].
In addition to parasitoid detection, the main objective of the current study was the evaluation of their impact on the pest population under field conditions. The mean parasitism rates of naturally laid eggs during the two years were 3.0% and 14.4%, respectively. In 2020 it ranged from 7.1 to 30.1%, with high variability observed between locations, landscapes, plant host species and parasitoid species. The overall parasitism rate in the first year was based entirely on recruitment of native parasitoids, while in the second year, the non-native Tr. mitsukurii made an important contribution. An increasing trend in parasitism rate and rapid recruitment of native parasitoids onto the novel invading host was observed during the research, with An. bifasciatus as the most abundant and widespread species. It should be pointed out that H. halys was not present in the region until 2017, and by 2019, slow population growth was recorded. Therefore, native parasitoids’ adaptation to the new host may be occurring quickly. In contrast to our findings, Dieckhoff et al. [34], who performed long-term surveys in northern Delaware, in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, had no indication that parasitism by native parasitoids increased over the course of nine years. Furthermore, non-native Trissolcus species, which are known to be effective biocontrol agents of H. halys in its native range, indigenous species can play an important role in pest population reduction in an invaded area. This study supports previous work that suggested An. bifasciatus as a potential biological control agent of H. halys in Europe [33,40,41,65].
The main approach in augmentative biocontrol of H. halys with An. bifasciatus is to release a relatively small number of adults in orchards or row crops to accelerate natural populations of parasitoids at releasing sites and to control the pest in the short term. Augmentative biocontrol of H. halys with An. bifasciatus was tested over three years in four orchards in Switzerland and Italy. Considering the parasitism level only, with an average of 6%, this was not high enough to effectively suppress the pest. However, the overall impact of A. bifasciatus on the mortality of H. halys found in the study was actually greater. Together with pre-imaginal parasitoid mortality (3.3%) and host feeding (6%), the overall H. halys mortality could reach an average of 15% [41].
Adaptation to local environmental conditions and ecosystems is an important advantage of native biological control agents [66] when compared to classical biological control agents, which are known to be rapid in the control of the co-evolved exotic prey. The coexistence and synergistic action of native and non-native species in controlling H. halys seem to be feasible. Konopka et al. [67] already confirmed the coexistence of Tr. japonicus and An. bifasciatus under laboratory conditions. The coexistence of species could be the result of counterbalance competition. Trissolcus japonicus dominates as a superior extrinsic (adult stage) competitor, characterized by superior egg guarding and aggressiveness, while A. bifasciatus is a superior intrinsic (larval stage) competitor with the ability to develop in previously parasitized eggs of all stages. By parasitization and host feeding, An. bifasciatus can interfere with the development of Tr. japonicus. The recent accidental arrivals of two non-native parasitoids in Europe represents a great challenge and opportunity for the future biological control of H. halys, which also brings different risk factors to native species that should be assessed.
The complex of natural enemies attacking H. halys diffesr in diverse habitats. In developing successful control strategies for managing invasive exotic pests, the efficacy of natural enemy complexes needs to be evaluated in a variety of landscapes [68]. The comparison of parasitoid species composition between the different habitats investigated in our study demonstrated a predominance of the native generalist parasitoid An. bifasciatus in urban and suburban areas, while Tr. mitsukurii was the prevailing species in agricultural areas. Our results support those obtained by Sabbatini Peverieri et al. [43], Zapponi et al. [38] and Scaccini et al. [44] in Northeast Italy.
Urban vegetation seems to be very attractive for H. halys. Deciduous ornamental trees act as a shelter, food source and oviposition sites. Among the 21 plant hosts registered during the survey, in urban areas, Catalpa bignonioides and Acer platanoides stand out regarding the highest number of egg masses collected and the parasitism rates recorded. A season-long presence of all life stages of H. halys confirms its preference for those two hosts, which was also presented in other recent studies [2,27,37,69,70,71].
In our study, Malus domestica has been found as the main oviposition host in agricultural areas. Apple is reported as a common host for H. halys in its native range [72] and is among the most acceptable hosts in the invaded areas [26,72]. It is considered the early season host [1,70]. Compared to other fruit trees, it is a less optimal host but sufficient when an alternative host is not available [73]. The parasitoid community composed of An. bifasciatus and Tr. mitsukurii in equal proportions was identified in apple orchards in Western Slovenia, with an overall parasitism rate of 8.6%. The coexistence of two native parasitoids from different genera in a similar habitat has been previously noted by Herlihy et al. [74], who found Anastatus reduvii (Howard)and Trissolcus euschisti (Ashmead) emerging from H. halys sentinel eggs exposed in apple orchards. That study also confirmed that the parasitoids were habitat-specific.
In general, the lower parasitism rates found in agricultural areas are related to pest management techniques undertaken in orchards, including broad-spectrum insecticide treatments. The compatibility of biological control with insecticide application is a key concern for a natural enemy establishment and the impact on pests in agroecosystems [75]. Insecticide treatment has a great impact on the reduction of parasitoid emergence from parasite egg masses [76].
Sentinel egg mass exposure can be an important tool in discovering and confirming the existence of native and alien stink bug parasitoids. However, our findings agree with Jones et al. [61] that this method underestimates the actual rates of parasitism and does not provide the whole picture of the parasitoid community composition. The total number of parasitoids emerged from naturally laid H. halys egg masses, and the species richness was greater than that obtained from sentinel egg masses.
The overall impact of chewing and sucking predators on naturally laid eggs observed during this survey was around 6%, which is consistent with findings in northern Italy [38] and in the Mid-Atlantic region of the USA [35]. Interestingly, the percentage of predation found on sentinel egg masses was over two times higher than on naturally laid eggs. In similar studies, highly variable results were obtained. Some authors reported a significantly lower percentage of predation compared to our results [36,37], while in other studies, the impact of predation was higher [33,34,47,77,78]. The findings of various studies suggest that the predation rate is very likely influenced by habitat diversity and that overall predation rates increase with plant species richness.
Considering the identity of egg predators, hypotheses can be made on the basis of laboratory studies performed in Italy [79,80], indicating that freshly laid H. halys egg masses are mainly preyed upon by some orthopterans, coccinellids and reduviids such as Eupholidoptera chabrieri (Charpentier), Adalia bipunctata (Linnaeus) and Nagusta goedelii (Kolenati), respectively [79], whereas ants such as Crematogaster scutellaris (Olivier) do not consume eggs, despite being able to prey upon all juvenile instars [80]. In any case, egg predators make an important contribution to the overall reduction of the H. halys population in natural habitats. Therefore, their impact should not be underestimated, and specific field studies are necessary to better clarify their role in the context of conservation biocontrol.
The identification of native natural enemies associated with H. halys and evaluation of their impact in its invaded range is essential prior to biological control implementation. The present study provides detailed information on the presence and species diversity of egg parasitoids associated with H. halys in Western Slovenia and the first insight into their performance in reducing H. halys populations. The data obtained provide a solid basis for future activities regarding the biological control of H. halys in Slovenia.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects12060505/s1, Table S1: Data on H. halys oviposition hosts in agricultural, suburban and urban area found in Goriška region (Western Slovenia).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R., S.T. and L.M.; Data curation, M.R. and S.T.; Formal analysis, M.R. and S.T.; Investigation, M.R. and S.T.; Methodology, L.M. and I.B.; Supervision, E.C. and I.B.; Writing—original draft, M.R.; Writing—review & editing, L.M., E.C., I.B., G.M. and L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co-financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food of Slovenia (MKGP) (project code: V4-2002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gabrijel Seljak for the advice and help with parasitoid identification. We are also grateful to Jolanda Persolja for creating the map. Finally, a special thank to our colleagues, researchers and technicians from the Plant Protection Department and Agriculture Advisory Service; Institute of Agriculture and Forestry Nova Gorica for their assistance and contribution in field sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, D.-H.; Short, B.D.; Joseph, S.V.; Bergh, J.C.; Leskey, T.C. Review of the biology, ecology, and management of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 627–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bergmann, E.J.; Venugopal, P.D.; Martinson, H.M.; Raupp, M.J.; Shrewsbury, P.M. Host plant use by the Invasive Halyomorpha halys (Stål) on woody ornamental trees and shrubs. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoebeke, E.; Carter, M.E. Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): A Polyphagous plant pest from Asia newly detected in North America. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2003, 105, 225–237. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bariselli, M.; Bugiani, R.; Maistrello, L. Distribution and damage caused by Halyomorpha halys in Italy. EPPO Bull. 2016, 46, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valentin, R.E.; Nielsen, A.L.; Wiman, N.G.; Lee, D.-H.; Fonseca, D.M. Global invasion network of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Vétek, G.; Korányi, D. Severe damage to vegetables by the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in Hungary. Period. Biol. 2017, 119, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leskey, T.C.; Nielsen, A.L. Impact of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug in North America and Europe: History, biology, ecology, and management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 599–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Fogain, R.; Graff, S. First records of the invasive pest, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in Ontario and Ouebec. J. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 2011, 142, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnold, K. Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855), eine für die europäische Fauna neu nachgewiesene Wanzenart (Insecta: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Cappaeini). Mitt. Thür. Entomol. 2009, 16, 19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wermelinger, B.; Forster, B.; Wyniger, D. First records of an invasive bug in Europe: Halyomorpha halys Stål (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), a new pest on woody ornamentals and fruit trees? Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. 2008, 81, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haye, T.; Wyniger, D.; Gariepy, T.D. Recent range expansion of brown marmorated stink bug in Europe. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Urban Pests, Zurich, Switzerland, 20–23 July 2014; Müller, G., Pospichil, R., Robinson, W., Eds.; OOK Press: Veszprém, Hungary, 2014; pp. 309–314. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maistrello, L.; Dioli, P.; Dutto, M.; Volani, S.; Pasquali, S.; Gilioli, G. Tracking the spread of sneaking aliens by integrating crowdsourcing and spatial modeling: The Italian invasion of Halyomorpha halys. BioScience 2018, 68, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Milonas, P.G.; Partsinevelos, G.K. First report of brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys Stål (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Greece. EPPO Bull. 2014, 44, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vétek, G.; Papp, V.; Haltrich, A.; Rédei, D. First record of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), in Hungary, with description of the genitalia of both sexes. Zootaxa 2014, 3780, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Macavei, L.I.; Bâețan, R.; Oltean, I.; Florian, T.; Varga, M.; Costi, E.; Maistrello, L. First detection of Halyomorpha halys Stål, a new invasive species with a high potential of damage on agricultural crops in Romania. Lucr. Ştiinţifice 2015, 58, 105–108. [Google Scholar]
  16. Šeat, J. Halyomorpha halys (STÅL, 1855) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) a new invasive species in Serbia. Acta Entomol. Serbica 2015, 20, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rabitsch, W.; Friebe, G.J. From the west and from the east? First records of Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Vorarlberg and Vienna, Austria. Beiträge Entomofaunist. 2015, 16, 126–129. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gapon, D.A. First records of the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855) (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae) in Russia, Abkhazia, and Georgia. Entmol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1086–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dioli, P.; Leo, P.; Maistrello, L. Prime segnalazioni in Spagna e in Sardegna della specie aliena Halyomorpha halys ( Stål, 1855) e note sulla sua distribuzione in Europa (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Rev. Gaditana Entomol. 2016, 7, 539–548. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hemala, V.; Kment, P. First record of Halyomorpha halys and mass occurrence of Nezara viridula in Slovakia. Plant Prot. Sci. 2017, 53, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Šapina, I.; Jelaska, L.Š. First report of invasive brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855) in Croatia. EPPO Bull. 2018, 48, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rot, M.; Devetak, M.; Carlevaris, B.; Žežlina, J.; Žežlina, I. First record of brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys Stål, 1855) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Slovenia. Acta Entomol. Slov. 2018, 26, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Inkley, D. Characteristics of home invasion by the brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 2012, 47, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leskey, T.C.; Short, B.D.; Butler, B.R.; Wright, S.E. Impact of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), in Mid-Atlantic tree fruit orchards in the United States: Case Studies of Commercial Management. Psyche 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maistrello, L.; Vaccari, G.; Caruso, S.; Costi, E.; Bortolini, S.; Macavei, L.; Foca, G.; Ulrici, A.; Bortolotti, P.P.; Nannini, R.; et al. Monitoring of the invasive Halyomorpha halys, a new key pest of fruit orchards in Northern Italy. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 88, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morrison, W.R.; Blaauw, B.R.; Short, B.D.; Nielsen, A.L.; Bergh, J.C.; Krawczyk, G.; Park, Y.L.; Butler, B.; Khrimian, A.; Leskey, T.C. Successful management of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera:Pentatomidae) in commercial apple orchards with an attract-and-kill strategy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 75, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Rice, K.B.; Bergh, C.J.; Bergmann, E.J.; Biddinger, D.J.; Dieckhoff, C.; Dively, G.; Fraser, H.; Gariepy, T.; Hamilton, G.; Haye, T.; et al. Biology, ecology, and management of brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. CSO Italy. Estimation of Damage from Brown Marmorated Stink Bug and Plant Pathologies Related to Climate Change. 2020. Available online: www.csoservizi.com (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  29. Candian, V.; Pansa, G.M.; Briano, M.; Peano, C.; Tedeschi, R.; Tavella, L. Exclusion nets a promising tool to prevent Halyomorpha halys from damaging nectarines and apples in NW Italy. Bull. Insectol. 2018, 71, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sabbatini, P.G.; Bortolotti, P.; Nannini, R.; Marianelli, L.; Roversi, P. Efficacy of long lasting insecticide nets in killing Halyomorpha halys in Pear Orchards. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2018, 29, 70–74. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, Z.-Q.; Yao, Y.-X.; Qiu, L.-F.; Li, Z.-X. A new species of Trissolcus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) parasitizing eggs of Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in China with comments on its biology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Gariepy, T.; Mason, P.; Gillespie, D.; Talamas, E.; Haye, T. Seasonal parasitism and host specificity of Trissolcus japonicus in northern China. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1127–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Haye, T.; Fischer, S.; Zhang, J.; Gariepy, T. Can native egg parasitoids adopt the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), in Europe? J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dieckhoff, C.; Tatman, K.M.; Hoelmer, K.A. Natural biological control of Halyomorpha halys by native egg parasitoids: A multi-year survey in Northern Delaware. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1143–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jones, A.L.; Jennings, D.E.; Hooks, C.R.R.; Shrewsbury, P.M. Field Surveys of Egg Mortality and indigenous egg parasitoids of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys, in ornamental nurseries in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the USA. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Costi, E.; Haye, T.; Maistrello, L. Surveying native egg parasitoids and predators of the invasive Halyomorpha halys in Northern Italy. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 143, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moraglio, S.T.; Tortorici, F.; Pansa, M.G.; Castelli, G.; Pontini, M.; Scovero, S.; Visentin, S.; Tavella, L. A 3-year survey on parasitism of Halyomorpha halys by egg parasitoids in Northern Italy. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zapponi, L.; Bon, M.C.; Fouani, J.M.; Anfora, G.; Schmidt, S.; Falagiarda, M. Assemblage of the Egg Parasitoids of the Invasive Stink Bug Halyomorpha halys: Insights on Plant Host Associations. Insects 2020, 11, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Abram, P.K.; Hoelmer, K.A.; Acebes-Doria, A.; Andrews, H.; Beers, E.H.; Bergh, J.C.; Bessin, R.; Biddinger, D.; Botch, P.; Buffington, M.L.; et al. Indigenous arthropod natural enemies of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug in North America and Europe. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1009–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roversi, P.F.; Marianelli, L.; Costi, E.; Maistrello, L.; Sabbatini, P.G. Searching for native egg-parasitoids of the invasive alien species Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Southern Europe. Redia 2016, 99, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  41. Stahl, J.M.; Babendreier, D.; Marazzi, C.; Caruso, S.; Costi, E.; Maistrello, L.; Haye, T. Can Anastatus Bifasciatus Be Used for Augmentative Biological Control of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in Fruit Orchards? Insects 2019, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Stahl, J.; Tortorici, F.; Pontini, M.; Bon, M.-C.; Hoelmer, K.; Marazzi, C.; Tavella, L.; Haye, T. First discovery of adventive populations of Trissolcus japonicus in Europe. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.S.; Talamas, E.; Bon, M.C.; Marianelli, L.; Bernardinelli, I.; Malossini, G.; Benvenuto, L.; Roversi, P.F.; Hoelmer, K. Two asian egg parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) emerge in Northern Italy: Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) and Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2018, 67, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Scaccini, D.; Falagiarda, M.; Tortorici, F.; Martinez-Sanudo, I.; Tirello, P.; Reyes-Dominguez, Y.; Gallmetzer, A.; Tavella, L.; Zandigiacomo, P.; Duso, C.; et al. An insight into the role of Trissolcus mitsukurii as biological control agent of Halyomorpha halys in Northeastern Italy. Insects 2020, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Trdan, S.; Bohinc, T. New records of biological control agents in Slovenia in the period 2012–2014. In Proceedings of the 68th International Symposium on Crop Protection (Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences), Gent, Belgium, 17 May 2016; pp. 375–380. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rot, M.; Devetak, M.; Žigon, P.; Ferlež Rus, A.; Matko, B.; Peterlin, A. Marmorirana smrdljivka (Halyomorpha halys (Stål, 1855) [Hemiptera, Pentatomidae]; pojav in razširjenost nove invazivne, tujerodne stenice v Sloveniji. In Proceedings of the Zbornik Predavanj in Referatov 14. Slovenskega Posvetovanja o Varstvu Rastlin z Mednarodno Udeležbo, Maribor, Slovenia, 5–6 March 2019; Trdan, S., Ed.; Društvo za Varstvo Rastlin Slovenije: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2019; pp. 134–141. (In Slovenian). [Google Scholar]
  47. Morrison, W.R.; Mathews, C.R.; Leskey, T.C. Frequency, efficiency, and physical characteristics of predation by generalist predators of brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) eggs. Biol. Control 2016, 97, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.S.; Mitroiu, M.-D.; Bon, M.-C.; Balusu, R.; Benvenuto, L.; Bernardinelli, I.; Fadamiro, H.; Falagiarda, M.; Fusu, L.; Grove, E.; et al. Surveys of stink bug egg parasitism in Asia, Europe and North America, morphological taxonomy, and molecular analysis reveal the Holarctic distribution of Acroclisoides sinicus (Huang & Liao) (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2019, 74, 123–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.; Giovannini, L.; Benvenuti, C.; Madonni, L.; Hoelmer, K.; Roversi, P.F. Characteristics of the meconia of European egg parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2020, 77, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Askew, R.; Nieves-Aldrey, J.-L. Further Observations on Eupelminae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eupelmidae) in the Iberian Peninsula and Canary Islands, including descriptions of new species. Graellsia 2004, 60, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peng, L.; Gibson, G.A.P.; Tang, L.U.; Xiang, J. Review of the Species of Anastatus (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) Known from China, with description of two new species with Brachypterous females. Zootaxa 2020, 4767, 351–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Samra, S.; Cascone, P.; Noyes, J.; Ghanim, M.; Protasov, A.; Guerrieri, E.; Mendel, Z. Diversity of Ooencyrtus spp. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) Parasitizing the eggs of Stenozygum coloratum (Klug) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with description of two new species. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Triapitsyn, S.V.; Andreason, S.A.; Power, N.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Fusu, L.; Dominguez, C.; Perring, T.M. Two new species of Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae), egg parasitoids of the bagrada bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae), with taxonomic notes on Ooencyrtus telenomicida. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2020, 76, 57–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Johnson, N.F. Systematics of Nearctic Telenomus: Classification and revisions of the podisi and phymatae species groups (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Bull. Ohio Biol. Surv. 1984, 6, 1–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Johnson, N.F. Systematics of new world Trissolcus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae): Species related to T. basalis. Can. Entomol. 1985, 117, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Talamas, E.J.; Johnson, N.F.; Buffington, M. Key to Nearctic species of Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae), Natural enemies of native and invasive stink bugs (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2015, 43, 45–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Talamas, E.J.; Buffington, M.L.; Hoelmer, K. Revision of Palearctic Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2017, 56, 3–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Balusu, R.; Talamas, E.; Cottrell, T.; Toews, M.; Blaauw, B.; Sial, A.; Buntin, D.; Fadamiro, H.; Tillman, G. First record of Trissolcus basalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) parasitizing Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the United States. BDJ 2019, 7, e39247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tortorici, F.; Talamas, E.J.; Moraglio, S.T.; Pansa, M.G.; Asadi-Farfar, M.; Tavella, L.; Caleca, V. A morphological, biological and molecular approach reveals four cryptic species of Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae), egg parasitoids of Pentatomidae (Hemiptera). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2019, 73, 153–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bin, F.; Vinson, S.B. E_cacy assesment in egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera): Proposal for a unified terminology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasitoids, San Antonio, TX, USA, 23 September 1990; Wajnberg, E., Vinson, S.B., Eds.; Perugia University: Perugia, Italy, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones, A.L.; Jennings, D.E.; Hooks, C.R.R.; Shrewsbury, P.M. Sentinel eggs underestimate rates of parasitism of the exotic brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys. Biol. Control 2014, 78, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Torchin, M.E.; Lafferty, K.D.; Dobson, A.P.; McKenzie, V.J.; Kuris, A.M. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 2003, 421, 628–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Torchin, M.E.; Mitchell, C.E. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Avila, G.A.; Charles, J.G. Correction to: Modelling the potential geographic distribution of Trissolcus japonicus: A biological control agent of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys. BioControl 2018, 63, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Conti, E.; Avila, G.; Barratt, B.; Cingolani, F.; Colazza, S.; Guarino, S.; Hoelmer, K.; Laumann, R.A.; Maistrello, L.; Martel, G.; et al. Biological control of invasive stink bugs: Review of global state and future prospects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2021, 169, 28–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Joshi, N.K.; Leslie, T.W.; Biddinger, D.J. Parasitism of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), by the native parasitoid, Trichopoda pennipes (Diptera: Tachinidae). Biology 2019, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Konopka, J.K.; Haye, T.; Gariepy, T.D.; McNeil, J.N. Possible coexistence of native and exotic parasitoids and their impact on control of Halyomorpha halys. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1119–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cornelius, M.L.; Dieckhoff, C.; Hoelmer, K.A.; Olsen, R.T.; Weber, D.C.; Herlihy, M.V.; Talamas, E.J.; Vinyard, B.T.; Greenstone, M.H. Biological control of sentinel egg masses of the exotic invasive stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Stal) in Mid-Atlantic USA ornamental landscapes. Biol. Control 2016, 103, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bakken, A.J.; Schoof, S.C.; Bickerton, M.; Kamminga, K.L.; Jenrette, J.C.; Malone, S.; Abney, M.A.; Herbert, D.A.; Reisig, D.; Kuhar, T.P.; et al. occurrence of brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on wild hosts in nonmanaged woodlands and soybean fields in North Carolina and Virginia. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 1011–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bosco, L.; Nardelli, M.; Tavella, L. First insights on early host plants and dispersal behavior of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from overwintering to crop colonization. Insects 2020, 11, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Holthouse, M.C.; Schumm, Z.R.; Talamas, E.J.; Spears, L.R.; Alston, D.G. Surveys in Northern Utah for egg parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys (Stal) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) detect Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Biodiver. Data J. 2020, 8, e53363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Funayama, K. Importance of apple fruits as food for the brown-marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2004, 39, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Nielsen, A.L.; Hamilton, G.C. Seasonal occurrence and impact of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in tree fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Herlihy, M.V.; Talamas, E.J.; Weber, D.C. Attack and success of native and exotic parasitoids on eggs of Halyomorpha halys in three Maryland habitats. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Lowenstein, D.M.; Andrews, H.; Hilton, R.J.; Kaiser, C.; Wiman, N.G. Establishment in an introduced range: Dispersal capacity and winter survival of Trissolcus japonicus, an adventive egg parasitoid. Insects 2019, 10, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Ludwick, D.C.; Patterson, J.; Leake, L.B.; Carper, L.; Leskey, T.C. Integrating Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead, 1904) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) into management programs for Halyomorpha halys (Stal, 1855) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in apple orchards: Impact of insecticide applications and spray patterns. Insects 2020, 11, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ogburn, E.C.; Bessin, R.; Dieckhoff, C.; Dobson, R.; Grieshop, M.; Hoelmer, K.A.; Mathews, C.; Moore, J.; Nielsen, A.L.; Poley, K.; et al. natural enemy impact on eggs of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in organic agroecosystems: A regional assessment. Biol. Control 2016, 101, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Tillman, G.; Toews, M.; Blaauw, B.; Sial, A.; Cottrell, T.; Talamas, E.; Buntin, D.; Joseph, S.; Balusu, R.; Fadamiro, H.; et al. Parasitism and predation of sentinel eggs of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stal) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in the southeastern US. Biol. Control 2020, 145, 104247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bulgarini, G.; Badra, Z.; Leonardi, S.; Maistrello, L. Predatory ability of generalist predators on eggs, young nymphs and adults of the invasive Halyomorpha halys in southern Europe. BioControl 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Castracani, C.; Bulgarini, G.; Giannetti, D.; Spotti, F.A.; Maistrello, L.; Mori, A.; Grasso, D.A. Predatory ability of the ant Crematogaster scutellaris on the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 12 00505 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of Anastatus bifasciatus, Trissolcus mitsukurii, Trisssolcus basalis and Telenomus sp. records in Western Slovenia.
Figure 1. Map of Anastatus bifasciatus, Trissolcus mitsukurii, Trisssolcus basalis and Telenomus sp. records in Western Slovenia.
Insects 12 00505 g001
Insects 12 00505 g002 550
Figure 2. Seasonal occurrence of H. halys egg parasitoids observed in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in 2020.
Figure 2. Seasonal occurrence of H. halys egg parasitoids observed in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in 2020.
Insects 12 00505 g002
Insects 12 00505 g003 550
Figure 3. Parasitoid efficiency in parasitizing naturally laid H. halys egg masses in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in years 2019 and 2020.
Figure 3. Parasitoid efficiency in parasitizing naturally laid H. halys egg masses in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in years 2019 and 2020.
Insects 12 00505 g003
Insects 12 00505 g004 550
Figure 4. Parasitoid efficiency in parasitizing sentinel Halyomorpha halys egg masses exposed in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in the years 2019 and 2020.
Figure 4. Parasitoid efficiency in parasitizing sentinel Halyomorpha halys egg masses exposed in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia) in the years 2019 and 2020.
Insects 12 00505 g004
Insects 12 00505 g005 550
Figure 5. Halyomorpha halys oviposition host diversity and parasitoid efficacy by host.
Figure 5. Halyomorpha halys oviposition host diversity and parasitoid efficacy by host.
Insects 12 00505 g005
Insects 12 00505 g006 550
Figure 6. Parasitoid impact in different landscapes in Western Slovenia.
Figure 6. Parasitoid impact in different landscapes in Western Slovenia.
Insects 12 00505 g006
Insects 12 00505 g007 550
Figure 7. Parasitoid occurrence in different landscapes in Western Slovenia.
Figure 7. Parasitoid occurrence in different landscapes in Western Slovenia.
Insects 12 00505 g007
Table
Table 1. Data on field survey in 2019 and 2020 in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia).
Table 1. Data on field survey in 2019 and 2020 in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia).
No.Location
Name		GPS CoordinatesType of LocationPredominant Host Plants
1Kromberk45°57′46.7964″ N
13°39′29.7324″ E		Suburban area
(backyard orchards and vineyards, hedges and shrubs)		Vitis vinifera, Prunus avium, Olea europea, Prunus domestica, Actinidia deliciosa, Cornus sanguinea, Ligustrum vulgare, Acer negundo, Hydrangea macrophylla
2Šempeter
pri Gorici		45°55′55.3908″ N
13°38′42.6408″ E		Suburban area/
Agricultural area
(intensive fruit orchards, ornamental plants)		Catalpa bignonioides, Parthenocissus tricuspidata, Actinidia deliciosa, Malus domestica, Pyrus pyrifolia, Pyrus communis, Olea europea, Prunus dulcis, Corylus avellana, Prunus persica, Vitis vinifera, Hibiscus syriaticus, Buddleja davidii
3Miren45°53′20.5116″ N
13°35′37.7916″ E		Agricultural area
(intensive fruit orchards, hedges and shrubs)		Malus domestica, Pyrus communis, Corylus avellana, Cornus sanguinea, Ligustrum vulgare, Acer negundo,Clematis vitalba, Ailanthus altissima, Parthenocissus quinquefolia
4Dombrava45°53′41.406″ N
13°40′54.3144″ E		Agricultural area
(intensive fruit orchards)		Malus domestica, Pyrus communis, Prunus persica, Vitis vinifera, Zea mays, Cornus sanguinea
5Goriška Brda46°0′11.6532″ N
13°31′23.9376″ E		Suburban area/
Agricultural area		Solanum lycopersicum, Vitis vinifera, Prunus avium, Monarda didyma
Goriška Brda I.45°58′31.9584″ N
13°31′53.3352″ E		Agricultural area
(intensive fruit orchards)		Olea europea, Prunus avium, Vitis vinifera
6Stara Gora45°55′48.5724″ N
13°40′50.0052″ E		Agricultural area
(extensive fruit orchard)		Actinidia deliciosa, Vitis vinifera, Robinia pseudoacacia, Acer sp., Paulownia tomentosa
7Pristava45°56′48.2928″ N
13°38′41.2476″ E		Suburban area
(extensive fruit orchard)		Actinidia deliciosa, Corylus avellana, Paulownia tomentosa
8Potoče45°52′33.3732″ N
13°49′20.3016″ E		Agricultural area
(field crops, vineyards)		Zea mays, Vitis vinifera
9Bilje45°53′47.3856″ N
13°37′27.2604″ E		Urban area
(ornamental trees)		Acer plantanoides
10Nova Gorica45°57′17.3016″ N
13°39′12.1788″ E		Urban area
(ornamental trees)		Catalpa bignonioides, Acer plantanoides
11Dobravlje45°52′16.6152″ N
13°50′9.816″ E		Agricultural area
(field crops)		Zea mays
Table
Table 2. Data on Halyomorpha halys naturally laid eggs collected in 2019 and 2020 in different locations in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia), percentage of hatched/unhatched/predated/parasitized eggs and number of parasitoids emerged.
Table 2. Data on Halyomorpha halys naturally laid eggs collected in 2019 and 2020 in different locations in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia), percentage of hatched/unhatched/predated/parasitized eggs and number of parasitoids emerged.
No.Location NameYearNo. of Egg MassesNo. of Eggs% Hatched% Unhatched% Predated% ParasitizedNo. of Parasitoids Emerged
1Kromberk201938466.6714.290,019.0516 AB
Kromberk2020719671.946.632.0419.3932 AB
2Šempeter 2019821989.504.106.390.00
Šempeter202069175966.8511.317.3914.38104 AB, 71 TM, 4 Tel
3Miren2019410981.653.6714.680.00
Miren20202254967.7613.842.0316.399 AB, 4 TM
4Dombrava201925787.727.025.260.00
Dombrava20201950273.1119.327.570.00
5Goriška Brda201925792.987.020.00.00
Goriška Brda2020719677.044.080.018.8824 AB, 12 TB
6Stara Gora2020411175.689.910.014.412 AB
7Pristava2020819569.747.189.2313.856 AB, 10 Tel
8Potoče202038365.068.430.026.5018 AB
9Bilje20201026653.016.7710.1530.0633 AB
10Nova Gorica2020513776.649.490.013.8717 AB
11Dobravlje202012835.7157.140.07.142 TM
Total20191952684.416.26.23.0416
2020155407568.3111.665.6014.43316
AB = Anastatus bifasciatus, Tel = Telenomus sp., TM = Trissolcus mitsukurii, TB = Trissolcus basalis.
Table
Table 3. Data on H. halys sentinel eggs exposed in 2019 and 2020 in two locations in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia), percentage of hatched/unhatched/predated/parasitized eggs and on data on parasitoids emerged.
Table 3. Data on H. halys sentinel eggs exposed in 2019 and 2020 in two locations in the Goriška region (Western Slovenia), percentage of hatched/unhatched/predated/parasitized eggs and on data on parasitoids emerged.
YearLocationLocation TypeNo. of Egg MassesNo. of Eggs% Hatched% Unhatched% Predated% ParasitizedNo. of Parasitoids Emerged
2019KromberkSuburban area2053071.6917.7410.5700
MirenAgricultural area2052869.3212.8817.420.382 OT
Total40105870.5115.3113.990.19
2020KromberkSuburban area50134060.6720.9711.496.8622 AB, 70 TM
MirenAgricultural area41107760.6316.9920.981.3915 AB
Total91241760.6519.2015.714.42
OT = Ooencyrtus telenomicida, AB = Anastatus bifasciatus, TM = Trissolcus mitsukurii.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rot, M.; Maistrello, L.; Costi, E.; Bernardinelli, I.; Malossini, G.; Benvenuto, L.; Trdan, S. Native and Non-Native Egg Parasitoids Associated with Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys [Stål, 1855]; Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Western Slovenia. Insects 2021, 12, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060505

AMA Style

Rot M, Maistrello L, Costi E, Bernardinelli I, Malossini G, Benvenuto L, Trdan S. Native and Non-Native Egg Parasitoids Associated with Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys [Stål, 1855]; Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Western Slovenia. Insects. 2021; 12(6):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rot, Mojca, Lara Maistrello, Elena Costi, Iris Bernardinelli, Giorgio Malossini, Luca Benvenuto, and Stanislav Trdan. 2021. "Native and Non-Native Egg Parasitoids Associated with Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys [Stål, 1855]; Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Western Slovenia" Insects 12, no. 6: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop