Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Indexes to Measure Comorbidity Burden and Predict All-Cause Mortality in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Preterm Births, Low Birthweights and Stillbirths: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
What Every Internist-Endocrinologist Should Know about Rare Genetic Syndromes in Order to Prevent Needless Diagnostics, Missed Diagnoses and Medical Complications: Five Years of ‘Internal Medicine for Rare Genetic Syndromes’
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Characteristics of Newborns Born to Mothers with COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pregnancy as a Risk Factor of Severe COVID-19

1
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, 65-001 Zielona Góra, Poland
2
Holy Cross Cancer Center, Clinical Gynecology, 25-743 Kielce, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(22), 5458; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225458
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 17 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 and Pregnancy)

Abstract

:
Since first being identified in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as an etiological agent behind Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), has caused three waves of a global pandemic, with a fourth in progress. Despite its high percentage of asymptomatic and low-symptomatic courses of illness, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has claimed a higher death toll than the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV epidemics because of its high infectivity when compared to the other coronaviruses. High COVID-19 mortality is associated with age and other coexisting morbidities, as well as healthcare quality. According to several studies, pregnant women are at a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes (caesarean delivery, pre-term birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia, ICU admission, and need for mechanical ventilation). In our review of recent literature, we focused on the effects of COVID-19 in pregnant women, emphasizing the subcellular pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2. In this paper, we concentrate on the pathophysiology of sub-cellular changes in COVID-19 and endeavor to highlight the aspects that manifest in physiological pregnancy and potentially create a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and acute COVID-19 symptoms. Understanding how pregnancy-associated changes can cause a synergistic effect with COVID-19 may point us in the right direction for future prophylaxis and treatment for women undergoing COVID-19 during pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Since the first identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV 2) as an etiological agent behind Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), over 174,574,445 [1] people throughout the world have caught the infection, causing over 3 756,744 deaths worldwide [1]. The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020. SARS-CoV-2 is a single-stranded RNA virus originating from the same family of viruses that may cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [2]. This group of viruses is characterized by an affinity for the angiotensin II converting enzyme (ACE2) receptor and can replicate in the respiratory tract epithelial cells [3,4]. Despite its high percentage of asymptomatic and low-symptomatic courses of illness, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has claimed a higher death toll than the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV epidemics because of its high rate of infectivity when compared to the other coronaviruses [5]. Identifying asymptomatic carriers proved difficult in the early months of the outbreak, and the virus spread to every country in the world. Thanks to the joint effort of the scientific community and pharmaceutical companies, numerous vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 became available, but despite their effectiveness, the third wave of the pandemic swept across many countries, with the European continent hit severely. The high COVID-19 mortality rate is associated with age and other coexisting morbidities as well as healthcare quality. People with a history of hypertension, cardiac disease, diabetes, COPD (chronic obturator pulmonary disease) and cancer face a higher risk of being infected by a harsher strain of COVID-19 and suffering death [4,6,7].

2. Coronaviridae and SARS-CoV-2 Lifecycles

With the 2002–2004 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in mind, followed by the MERS epidemic of 2012, we introduce the subject of the morbidity rate in pregnant women infected with these viruses. The SARS epidemic showed that 25–50% of infected pregnant women required intensive care, with the mortality rate estimated at 18–25% [8]. During the latter, 41% of pregnant women were admitted to ICUs, and the mortality rate was 25% [9]. It is worth noting the resemblance between the SARS-CoV (SARS causative virus) and the MERS-CoV (MERS causative virus) when compared with the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). This genetic similarity reaches 79% for SARS-CoV and 59% for MERS-CoV [9,10], which is enough to cause concern in pregnant patients.
SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped single-stranded RNA virus [11]. The genome size is about 26 to 30 kilobases and the diameter of the virion 80–120 nm [12,13]. The virus is composed of four structural proteins: spike protein (S), membrane protein (M), nucleocapsid protein (N), and envelope protein (E). Studies on the 3D architecture of the virion showed that a bilayer of lipids surrounds the RNA and N proteins. The N protein acts as a protector of the viral genome. With the S protein emerging outwards, the E and M proteins occur in the lipid layers, and are taken from the host cell before the budding of the new virions [14,15,16]. This phenomenon is attributable to the viruses’ inability to produce lipid particles. However, to aid in viral replication and assembly, they can repurpose infected cells’ lipids [2].
We can divide the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 into several phases, of which the attachment and entry into the cell is the crucial phase [11]. Cell entry into host cells is possible as a result of the strong tropism of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) for the angiotensin II converting enzyme receptor (ACE-2 receptor) [17,18,19,20]. ACE-2 is a cellular transmembrane protein present in most cells, with high expression within type II pneumocytes, enterocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells of arteries. Binding to ACE-2 is necessary for host cell proteases to trigger a shift in the conformation of the S proteins (priming) [21,22]. The protease of interest in SARS-CoV-2 infection is the transmembrane serine 2 (TMPRSS2), which carries out the proteolytic cleavage of the S protein and exposes the fusion peptide [17,22]. The fusion peptide can fuse with the targeted cell membrane and pull the viral particle into the cell membrane, thus allowing them to release the viral genome into the host cell [23,24]. Following cell entry, viral RNA is treated as a transcript and facilitates the translation of ORF1a, producing polyprotein pp1a [25]. The structure of ORF1a causes frameshifting within 30% of the ribosomes in the infected cell and produces polyprotein pp1ab [2]. Due to their autoproteolytic function, both proteins generate other non-structural proteins (NSPS) that establish designated behavior in viral replication and form new virions [24,26]. Genomic RNA then becomes a template for the synthesizing of the antisense genome and a new full-length RNA genome of SARS-CoV-2 [12,25]. SARS-CoV-2 undergoes virion assembly in the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), with the membrane (M) protein of SARS-CoV-2 acting as a mediator in the process [27]. The M protein is crucial for protein binding and forming a sort of virion scaffolding that can attract and attach to other viral protein complexes (M-S (spike) and M-N (nucleocapsid), M-E (envelope) [28,29,30]. Next, the viral particles present in ERGIC are transported by smooth-walled vesicles through the secretory pathway and released via exocytosis [2]. The life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 has been presented on Figure 1.
(1)
SARS-CoV-2 enters the cell due to the strong tropism of S protein for ACE-2 receptor;
(2)
Fusion of SARS-CoV-2 and the hosts’ cell membrane;
(3)
Viral RNA is released into the cell;
(4)
Viral RNA is treated as a transcript allowing the translation of ORF1a, which causes frameshifting within 30% of ribosomes, and production of polyprotein pp1ab;
(5)
Genomic RNA is then used as a template for the synthesis of an antisense genome, and then a new full-length RNA genome of SARS-CoV-2;
(6)
Virion assembly in the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) with the M protein attracting and attaching to other viral protein complexes M-S, M-N, and M-E;
(7)
Mature viral particles are transported by smooth-walled vesicles through the secretory pathway;
(8)
Exocytosis of new mature viral particles.
When COVID-19 is severe in its course, the host immune system responds in an uncontrolled process of releasing cytokines (cytokine storm) [31,32]. Cytokines are signaling particles capable of recruiting immune cells as a defense mechanism against infecting agents [32]. In the SARS-CoV-2 infection, this can be upregulated and may drastically increase the leukocyte recruitment to affect the body organs, with the lungs being the most affected, leading to ARDS [33]. The increase in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can help diagnose clinically high levels of cytokines (or cytokine-storm). Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 can infect white blood cells (WBC) (lymphocytes, dendritic cells, monocytes, and macrophages), accelerating the cytokine storm [34,35,36].

3. Physiological Changes Occurring in Pregnancy That May Contribute to COVID-19 Course

3.1. Cardiovascular System

Changes in the cardiovascular system are caused by the placental production of oestrogen and progesterone [37]. The circulating blood volume increases and reaches its maximum between 32 and 34 weeks of pregnancy [38]. The higher increase in serum volume (40–50%) than in red blood cells (20–30%) leads to lower hemoglobin concentrations and hemodilution [39].
Moreover, the heart stroke volume (SV) is increased in pregnant women and reaches its peak at around the 20th week of pregnancy [40,41]. The heart rate (HR) increases by about 10–15 bpm. Venous return is also decreased by up to 24% starting with the II trimester. The increase in blood retention in the venous system and dilation of the arterial capillary vessels may cause renal insufficiency [42]. But the above changes have a protective effect on pulmonary hypertension during the highest increase in circulating blood volume [43,44]. Blood pressure (BP) also decreases during physiological pregnancy as an effect of increasing the activity (and concentration of all components) of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAS) [45]. This mechanism does not exclude ACE-2 [46]. Renin is the first hormone to undergo upregulation by the extrarenal release from the decidual tissue and ovaries [47]. In the II trimester, the placenta produces increasing amounts of estrogen, which induces liver synthesis of angiotensinogen and, in effect, increases the levels of angiotensin II (Ang II) [48]. The function of ACE-2 is to hydrolyze angiotensin I (Ang I) to a nonapeptide Ang-(1-9) and Ang II to a heptapeptide Ang-(1-7). Lower BP during pregnancy is achieved by maintaining a balance between increased levels of Ang II and decreased sensitivity to Ang II together with higher levels of Ang-(1-7). Ang-(1-7) has a vasodilatory (RAS modulation), antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory (decreasing TNF-α levels and increasing the anti-inflammatory activity of IL-10) effect [49,50].

3.2. Respiratory System

Respiratory system changes occur on every level. The mucosa of the nasopharynx, larynx, trachea, and bronchi is hyperemic and edematous. The causative agent behind it is progesterone, but at the same time, it is responsible for bronchodilation [51]. Progesterone also lowers the carbon dioxide response threshold of the respiratory center [52]. This physiological edema may worsen even during mild infections of the upper respiratory tract [53]. The diaphragm is lifted upwards by the enlarged uterus by up to 4 cm. The dimensions of the chest increase, as does the subcostal angle of the ribs. The result is a decrease in the functional residual capacity (FRC) by 20% to 30%, depending on position [54,55]. A total lung capacity (TLC) is maintained to meet the increased demand for body oxygen (by 20%), and with an unchanged (or only slightly increased) respiratory rate, a higher tidal volume, and a steep increase in minute ventilation with onset in the first trimester [51].

3.3. Immune System

Pregnancy demands a unique balance between natural immune tolerance for an allogeneic transplant, the fetus, and preserving an immune response against microbial infections. The exact nature of these is dependent on the gestational age [56]. All of this is necessary to meet the specific developmental fetus at different stages. The changes are not only present locally in the endometrium but are systemic, a factor that can determine the course of COVID-19 to diagnose during a gestational week.
Immunological status during pregnancy induces an increased response against viral infections by exacerbating the activity of natural killer (NK) cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) and monocytes [56,57,58]. Oppositely, Th1 cell activity decreases, and the naïve CD4+ T cells cannot produce Th1 cells at the same level as before pregnancy. Furthermore, the Th2 response is augmented, causing increased morbidity from intracellular pathogens [59]. In the first trimester, the T regulatory lymphocytes (Treg) play a central role in pregnancy implantation and the induction of maternal immunological tolerance for the developing fetus, as they suppress Th1-and Th-17-mediated immune responses [60]. This mechanism generates a further shift in the pregnant woman’s immune system, leading to a Th2-oriented response.

4. Manifestation and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Pregnancy

4.1. Clinical Manifestations

Clinical manifestations found most commonly in patients with COVID-19 during pregnancy do not differ from the symptoms in non-pregnant patients. Most often, they present with cough (41% of patients), fever (40% of patients), and dyspnea (21% of patients). It is necessary to mention that pregnant patients are likely to have an asymptomatic course of COVID-19 [61,62]. In laboratory parameters, raised C reactive protein (CRP) levels (49% of patients), lymphopenia (33%), and increased leukocyte count (in 26% of patients) were the most common findings [48]. Although we expect young patients to present with mild COVID-19 courses, the pregnant group was more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), with a need for invasive ventilation and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) [61,63] than non-pregnant patients. The risk factors associated with severe COVID-19 and the above complications are a high body-mass index (BMI), chronic hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and pre-existing diabetes [6,61]. All of this points to vascular changes as being the cornerstone of the severe COVID-19 course. As a long-term effect, we may also expect a higher risk of pre-eclampsia or preterm birth (PTB) in pregnant women who have suffered from COVID-19 [61,64].

4.2. Vaccination and Pregnancy

After introducing the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the elderly and medical personnel were the first to be vaccinated, given they are at the highest risk of infection by a severe COVID-19 course. The latter remain at the highest risk from the virus. With time, the social interest in vaccination has diminished, and in many countries, the younger population shows the lowest vaccination rates. Because of the higher risk COVID-19 poses to pregnant women and of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ARSM), the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), and the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have all spoken in favor of vaccination in the pregnant population, non-discriminatory of gestational age [65,66,67,68,69].
Studies reveal encouraging results for the COVID-19 vaccine [69,70]. Millions of vaccinated pregnant women have undergone observation. Therefore, we must determine whether or not to administer the vaccine during the first trimester of the pregnancy or the second and third trimesters. The rationale behind second and third trimester vaccination can be the potential to pass antibodies from the mother to the fetus, thus causing passive immunity in the child after delivery [69,71]. It is now an important determination considering the clinical trials in children under five are ongoing, and the results are pending. The argument against the first trimester vaccination could stem from the fear of the pregnant patient suffering an early gestational miscarriage. In a recent Norwegian study, this correlation was not proven, as the rates of early gestational miscarriage were similar in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations [72].
Nevertheless, the acceptance of vaccination during pregnancy is dependent on region. In a study performed amidst the third wave of the pandemic (published March 2021), a very high (above 80%) acceptance for vaccination was shown during pregnancy in Mexico and India and below 45% in Russia, the USA, and Australia [73]. This has proven to be more optimistic than reality. The most recent CDC data concerning pregnant population vaccinations (6th November 2021) show that only 13.7% of the pregnant population aged 18–49 was vaccinated before pregnancy, 2.6% received the second dose during pregnancy and 19% were fully vaccinated during pregnancy, adding to a total of 35.3% fully vaccinated pregnant population [74].

5. Conclusions and Further Study Directions

Our conclusions from this review are as follows:
Despite the usually mild or asymptomatic course of COVID-19 in younger patients, the pregnant population of the same age has a higher risk of severe and complicated COVID-19. Together with an ever-increasing number of pregnant women with gestational diabetes and obesity, this points to the fact that pregnant women are of critical interest to medical staff and need to be diagnosed and monitored with great care by medical providers.
PTB may not be iatrogenic due to maternal complications in the third trimester (associated with ARDS in the mother).
The vaccination rates among pregnant women are lower than expected in a high-risk population, and broad actions should be taken to promote knowledge of the benefits and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1 (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  2. Machhi, J.; Herskovitz, J.; Senan, A.M.; Dutta, D.; Nath, B.; Oleynikov, M.D.; Blomberg, W.R.; Meigs, D.D.; Hasan, M.; Patel, M.; et al. The Natural History, Pathobiology, and Clinical Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 Infections. J. Neuroimm. Pharmacol. 2020, 15, 359–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malinowski, A.K.; Noureldin, A.; Othman, M. COVID-19 susceptibility in pregnancy: Immune/inflammatory considerations, the role of placental ACE-2 and research considerations. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 20, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moghadam, S.O. A review on currently available potential therapeutic options for covid-19. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 13, 443–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rasmussen, S.A.; Smulian, J.C.; Lednicky, J.A.; Wen, T.S.; Jamieson, D.J. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. DeBolt, C.A.; Bianco, A.; Limaye, M.A.; Silverstein, J.; Penfield, C.A.; Roman, A.S.; Rosenberg, H.M.; Ferrara, L.; Lambert, C.; Khoury, R.; et al. Pregnant women with severe or critical COVID-19 have increased composite morbidity compared to non-pregnant matched controls. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 24, P510.E1–P510.E12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sadeghi, A.; Moghadam, A.D.; Pirsalehi, A.; Shojaee, S.; Sanadgol, G.; Vahidi, M.; Mojarad, E.N. The characteristics of cancerous patients infected with COVID-19 in hospital setting. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, e2020145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wong, S.F.; Chow, K.M.; Leung, T.N.; Ng, W.F.; Ng, T.K.; Shek, C.C.; Ng, P.C.; Lam, P.W.; Ho, L.C.; To, W.W.; et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 191, P292–P297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dashraath, P.; Wong, J.L.J.; Lim, M.X.K.; Lim, L.M.; Li, S.; Biswas, A.; Choolani, M.; Mattar, C.; Su, L.L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, P521–P531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.-M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.-G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.-W.; Tian, J.-H.; Pei, Y.-Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, P565–P574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wrapp, D.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K.S.; Goldsmith, J.A.; Hsieh, C.-L.; Abiona, O.; Graham, B.S.; McLellan, J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. bioRxiv 2020, 367, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cui, J.; Li, F.; Shi, Z.L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schoeman, D.; Fielding, B.C. Coronavirus envelope protein: Current knowledge. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Khailany, R.A.; Safdar, M.; Ozaslan, M. Genomic characterization of a novel SARS-CoV-2. Gene Rep. 2020, 19, 100682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448, Published online. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cao, B.; Wang, Y.; Wen, D.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Fan, G.; Ruan, L.; Song, B.; Cai, Y.; Wei, M.; et al. A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shang, J.; Ye, G.; Shi, K.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Aihara, H.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 581, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Sui, J.; Kuhn, J.H.; Moore, M.J.; Luo, S.; Wong, S.-K.; Huang, I.-C.; Xu, K.; Vasilieva, N.; et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 1634–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, W.; Du, R.-H.; Li, B.; Zheng, X.-S.; Yang, X.-L.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Xiao, G.-F.; Yan, B.; Shi, Z.-L.; et al. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: Implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, P271–P280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rey, F.A.; Lok, S.M. Common Features of Enveloped Viruses and Implications for Immunogen Design for Next-Generation Vaccines. Cell 2018, 172, P1319–P1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, F. Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016, 3, 237–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Masters, P.S. The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 65, 193–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gao, Y.; Yan, L.; Huang, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, L.; Wang, T.; Sun, Q.; Ming, Z.; Zhang, L.; et al. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science 2020, 368, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kono, M.; Tatsumi, K.; Imai, A.M.; Saito, K.; Kuriyama, T.; Shirasawa, H. Inhibition of human coronavirus 229E infection in human epithelial lung cells (L132) by chloroquine: Involvement of p38 MAPK and ERK. Antiviral Res. 2008, 77, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Siu, Y.L.; Teoh, K.T.; Lo, J.; Chan, C.M.; Kien, F.; Escriou, N.; Tsao, S.W.; Nicholls, J.M.; Altmeyer, R.; Peiris, J.S.M.; et al. The M, E, and N Structural Proteins of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Are Required for Efficient Assembly, Trafficking, and Release of Virus-Like Particles. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 11318–11330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lim, K.P.; Liu, D.X. The missing link in coronavirus assembly. Retention of the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus envelope protein in the pre-Golgi compartments and physical interaction between the envelope and membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 17515–17523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nakauchi, M.; Kariwa, H.; Kon, Y.; Yoshii, K.; Maeda, A.; Takashima, I. Analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus structural proteins in virus-like particle assembly. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 52, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.W.; Zhao, H.; Wang, G.Q. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19: Interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce mortality. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 05954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moore, J.B.; June, C.H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020, 368, 473–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, B.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, C.; Song, Y.; Feng, F.; Qiu, Y.; Feng, J.; Jia, Q.; Song, Q.; Zhu, B.; et al. Immune Phenotyping Based on the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and IgG Level Predicts Disease Severity and Outcome for Patients With COVID-19. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, M.D. Macrophages: A Trojan horse in COVID-19? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yuki, K.; Fujiogi, M.; Koutsogiannaki, S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 215, 108427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S.I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J.M.; Moderbacher, C.R.; Rawlings, S.A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R.S.; et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 2020, 181, 1489–1501.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Almeida, F.A.; Pavan, M.V.; Rodrigues, C.I.S. The haemodynamic, renal excretory and hormonal changes induced by resting in the left lateral position in normal pregnant women during late gestation. BJOG 2009, 116, 1749–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clark, S.L.; Cotton, D.B.; Lee, W.; Bishop, C.; Hill, T.; Southwick, J.; Pivarnik, J.; Spillman, T.; DeVore, G.R.; Phelan, J.; et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 161, 1439–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bernstein, I.M.; Ziegler, W.; Badger, G.J. Plasma volume expansion in early pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 97, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Capeless, E.L.; Clapp, J.F. Cardiovascular changes in early phase of pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 161, 1449–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Capeless, E.L.; Clapp, J.F. When do cardiovascular parameters return to their preconception values? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 165, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Flo, K.; Wilsgaard, T.; Vårtun, A.; Acharya, G. A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG 2010, 117, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Campos, O.; Andrade, J.L.; Bocanegra, J.; Ambrose, J.A.; Carvalho, A.C.; Harada, K.; Martinez, E.E. Physiologic multivalvular regurgitation during pregnancy: A longitudinal Doppler echocardiographic study. Int. J. Cardiol. 1993, 40, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Evans, P.J.; Rajappan, K.; Stocks, G.M. Cardiorespiratory symptoms during pregnancy--not always pulmonary embolism. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2006, 15, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Irani, R.A.; Xia, Y. Renin Angiotensin Signaling in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Semin. Nephrol. 2011, 31, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Brosnihan, K.B.; Neves, L.A.A.; Anton, L.; Joyner, J.; Valdes, G.; Merrill, D.C. Enhanced expression of Ang-(1-7) during pregnancy. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2004, 37, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hsueh, W.A.; Luetscher, J.A.; Carlson, E.J.; Grislis, G.; Fraze, E.; McHargue, A. Changes in active and inactive renin throughout pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1982, 54, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brown, M.A.; Gallery, E.D.M.; Ross, M.R.; Esber, R.P. Sodium excretion in normal and hypertensive pregnancy: A prospective study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988, 159, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kangussu, L.M.; Melo-Braga, M.N.; de Souza Lima, B.S.; Santos, R.A.S.; de Andrade, H.M.; Campagnole-Santos, M.J. Angiotensin-(1-7) Central Mechanisms After ICV Infusion in Hypertensive Transgenic (mRen2)27 Rats. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 624249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Merrill, D.C.; Karoly, M.; Chen, K.; Ferrario, C.M.; Brosnihan, K.B. Angiotensin-(1-7) in Normal and Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Endocrine 2002, 18, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. LoMauro, A.; Aliverti, A. Respiratory physiology of pregnancy: Physiology masterclass. Breathe 2015, 11, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lyons, H.; Antonio, R. The sensitivity of the respiratory center in pregnancy and after administration of progesterone. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians 1959, 72, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu, H.; Wang, L.L.; Zhao, S.J.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Mor, G.; Liao, A.H. Why are pregnant women susceptible to COVID-19? An immunological viewpoint. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 139, 103122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jensen, D.; Webb, K.A.; Davies, G.A.L.; O’Donnell, D.E. Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: Implications for respiratory sensation. J. Physiol. 2018, 586, 4735–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McAuliffe, F.; Kametas, N.; Costello, J.; Rafferty, G.F.; Greenough, A.; Nicolaides, K. Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG An. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2002, 109, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aghaeepour, N.; Ganio, E.A.; Mcilwain, D.; Tsai, A.S.; Tingle, M.; Van Gassen, S.; Gaudilliere, D.K.; Baca, Q.; McNeil, L.; Okada, R.; et al. An immune clock of human pregnancy. Sci. Immunol. 2017, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kay, A.W.; Fukuyama, J.; Aziz, N.; Dekker, C.L.; Mackey, S.; Swan, G.E.; Davis, M.M.; Holmes, S.; Blish, C.A. Enhanced natural killer-cell and T-cell responses to influenza A virus during pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14506–14511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Le Gars, M.; Kay, A.W.; Bayless, N.L.; Aziz, N.; Dekker, C.L.; Swan, G.E.; Davis, M.M.; Blish, C.A. Increased proinflammatory responses of monocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells to influenza a virus infection during pregnancy. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ghi, T.; di Pasquo, E.; Mekinian, A.; Calza, L.; Frusca, T. Sars-CoV-2 in pregnancy: Why is it better than expected? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 252, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Shevyrev, D.; Tereshchenko, V. Treg Heterogeneity, Function, and Homeostasis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Allotey, J.; Stallings, E.; Bonet, M.; Yap, M.; Chatterjee, S.; Kew, T.; Debenham, L.; Llavall, A.C.; Dixit, A.; Zhou, D.; et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020, 370, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Narang, K.; Enninga, E.A.L.; Gunaratne, M.D.; Ibirogba, E.R.; Trad, A.T.A.; Elrefaei, A.; Theiler, R.N.; Ruano, R.; Szymanski, L.M.; Chakraborty, R.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 During Pregnancy: A Multidisciplinary Review. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1750–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lokken, E.M.; Huebner, E.M.; Taylor, G.G.; Hendrickson, S.; Vanderhoeven, J.; Kachikis, A.; Coler, B.; Walker, C.L.; Sheng, J.S.; Al-Haddad, B.J.; et al. Disease severity, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal deaths among pregnant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Washington State. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 77.e1–77.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Villar, J.; Ariff, S.; Gunier, R.B. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Among Pregnant Women With and Without COVID-19 Infection: The INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. ACOG Vaccinating Pregnant and Lactating Patients against COVID-19. 24 March 2021. Available online: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/vaccinating-pregnant-and-lactating-patients-against-covid-19 (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  66. CDC–COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Update Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Tom Shimabukuro, MD, MPH, MBACDC COVID19 Vaccine Task Force Vaccine. 1 March 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-02/28-03-01/05-covid-Shimabukuro.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  67. SMFM—Provider Considerations for Engaging in COVID-19 Vaccine Counseling with Pregnant and Lactating Patients. Available online: https://www.smfm.org/covidclinical (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  68. RCOG—COVID Guidelines Updated 16 April 2021. Available online: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2021-02-24-combined-info-sheet-and-decision-aid.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  69. Shimabukuro, T.T.; Kim, S.Y.; Myers, T.R. Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Peretz, S.B.; Regev, N.; Novick, L.; Nachshol, M.; Goffer, E.; Ben-David, A.; Asraf, K.; Doolman, R.; Levin, E.G.; Yochay, G.R.; et al. Short-term outcome of pregnant women vaccinated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 58, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yan, Z.; Yang, M.; Lai, C.L. COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Comprehensive Review of Their Safety and Efficacy in Special Populations. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Magnus, M.C.; Gjessing, H.K.; Eide, H.N.; Wilcox, A.J.; Fell, D.B.; Håberg, S.E. Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy and First-Trimester Miscarriage. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 2008–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Skjefte, M.; Ngirbabul, M.; Akeju, O.; Escudero, D.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Wyszynski, D.F.; Wu, J.W. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women and mothers of young children: Results of a survey in 16 countries. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 36, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. CDC COVID Data Tracker. Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations-pregnant-women (accessed on 17 November 2021).
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 lifecycle.
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 lifecycle.
Jcm 10 05458 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Celewicz, A.; Celewicz, M.; Michalczyk, M.; Woźniakowska-Gondek, P.; Krejczy, K.; Misiek, M.; Rzepka, R. Pregnancy as a Risk Factor of Severe COVID-19. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225458

AMA Style

Celewicz A, Celewicz M, Michalczyk M, Woźniakowska-Gondek P, Krejczy K, Misiek M, Rzepka R. Pregnancy as a Risk Factor of Severe COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(22):5458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Celewicz, Aleksander, Marta Celewicz, Michał Michalczyk, Paula Woźniakowska-Gondek, Kamila Krejczy, Marcin Misiek, and Rafał Rzepka. 2021. "Pregnancy as a Risk Factor of Severe COVID-19" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 22: 5458. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop