Next Article in Journal
Repair of Traumatic Urethral Strictures: La Paz University Hospital Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Blood Pressure Signal Entropy as a Novel Marker of Physical Frailty: Results from the FRAILMatics Clinical Cohort
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Its Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Subclinical Target Organ Damage

by
Paula Antelo-Pais
1,
Miguel Ángel Prieto-Díaz
2,
Rafael M. Micó-Pérez
3,
Vicente Pallarés-Carratalá
4,5,*,
Sonsoles Velilla-Zancada
6,
José Polo-García
7,
Alfonso Barquilla-García
8,
Leovigildo Ginel-Mendoza
9,
Antonio Segura-Fragoso
10,
Facundo Vitelli-Storelli
11,
Vicente Martín-Sánchez
12,
Álvaro Hermida-Ameijerias
13 and
Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo
14,† on behalf of the Investigators of the IBERICAN Study and of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) Foundation
1
Santa Comba Health Centre, Health Area of Santiago de Compostela, 15970 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
Vallobín-La Florida Health Centre, 33012 Oviedo, Spain
3
Fontanars dels Alforins Health Centre, Xàtiva–Ontinyent Department of Health, 46635 Valencia, Spain
4
Health Surveillance Unit, Mutual Insurance Union, 12004 Castellon, Spain
5
Department of Medicine, Jaume I University, 12071 Castellon, Spain
6
Joaquin Elizalde Health Centre, 26004 Logroño, Spain
7
Casar de Cáceres Health Centre, 10200 Cáceres, Spain
8
Trujillo Health Center, 10200 Cáceres, Spain
9
Ciudad Jardín Health Center, 29014 Málaga, Spain
10
Epidemiology Unit, Semergen Research Agency, 28029 Madrid, Spain
11
Gene-Environment-Health Interaction Research Group (GIIGAS)/Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León, 24071 León, Spain
12
Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Epidemiology and Public Health Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBERESP), University of León, 24071 León, Spain
13
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 A Coruña, Spain
14
Porto do Son Health Centre, Health Area of Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Networking Biomedical Research Centre-Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV), 15970 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membership of the investigators of the IBERICAN Study and of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) Foundation is provided in the Appendix A.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(1), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010050
Submission received: 13 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)

Abstract

:
The role of uric acid levels in the cardiovascular continuum is not clear. Our objective is to analyze the prevalence of hyperuricemia (HU) and its association with cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), subclinical target organ damage (sTOD), and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We evaluated the prevalence of HU in 6.927 patients included in the baseline visit of the IBERICAN study. HU was defined as uric acid levels above 6 mg/dL in women, and 7 mg/dL in men. Using adjusted logistic regression models, the odds ratios were estimated according to CVRF, sTOD, and CVD. The prevalence of HU was 16.3%. The risk of HU was higher in patients with pathological glomerular filtration rate (aOR: 2.92), heart failure (HF) (aOR: 1.91), abdominal obesity (aOR: 1.80), hypertension (HTN) (aOR: 1.65), use of thiazides (aOR: 1.54), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (aOR: 1.36), atrial fibrillation (AFIB) (aOR: 1.29), and albuminuria (aOR: 1.27). On the other hand, being female (aOR: 0.82) showed a reduced risk. The prevalence of HU was higher in men, in patients presenting CVRF such as HTN and abdominal obesity, and with co-existence of LVH, atrial fibrillation (AFIB), HF, and any form of kidney injury. These associations raise the possibility that HU forms part of the early stages of the cardiovascular continuum. This may influence its management in Primary Healthcare because the presence of HU could mean an increased CV risk in the patients.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in Spain, particularly in women [1], and are also the second leading cause of years of life lost after cancer [2]. A decreasing trend, in standardized rates, has been observed in the last few decades which is due to the improvements in primary prevention, lifestyle modification, better control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), and better management and treatment, mainly interventional, in the acute phase of events [3]. However, despite the better control of CVRF, many patients develop CVD, suggesting that there may be remaining factors which are not controlled.
Atherosclerosis is the pathophysiological base of CVD, which progresses silently over decades due to the effect of CVRF and of subclinical target organ damages (sTOD) to the development of CVD [4]. This is what is known as the cardiovascular continuum.
Among CVRF, the potential role of uric acid—a product of xanthine oxidase—in the development of CVD has been set forth, since high uric acid levels have been identified in the context of oxidative stress and of CVD, such as ischemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF) [5].
Hyperuricemia (HU) is associated with a state of oxidative stress that produces endothelial dysfunction, increases oxidation of LDL, and promotes a proinflammatory state which contributes to the development of atherosclerosis and its thrombotic complications [6,7,8,9]. The presence of uric acid in the atheromatous plaque is the reason why the classical cut-off points defining HU (6 mg/dL in women, and 7 mg/dL in men) are based on the levels of precipitation in uric acid [10,11].
At present, there are studies available that provide solid results on the relationship between HU and CVRF such as hypertension (HTN) [12], diabetes mellitus (DM) [13], obesity [14], hypercholesterolemia [15], and metabolic syndrome (MetS) [13,16], as well as between HU and sTOD [17,18]. Nevertheless, results are more controversial and contradictory regarding its association with CVD [19,20,21]. These discrepancies could be justified by the presence of uncontrolled confounding factors in those studies, for example, the difference between the sexes, the peripheral insulin resistance, or the MetS [22]. The real role of HU and how it is associated with other CVRF has remained unknown until now. A relationship between HU and several metabolic conditions (DM, MetS, obesity, or HTN) has been suggested. In addition, some authors explain the association between HU and a worse prognosis in patients with an acute coronary disease [23] or after the initial hospitalization for HF [24].
Forming a complete picture about patients and the CVRF, the risk factors needing to be controlled, and the sTOD or CVD rates would allow us to control the confounding effect among all the variables and to further the study of the role of HU in the cardiovascular continuum, as is the case of the IBERICAN study (Identification of Spanish Population in Cardiovascular and Renal Risk) [25].
The objective of this study is to analyze which CVRF, sTOD, and CVD are associated with HU in patients seen in primary care practices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Cross-sectional HU prevalence study conducted in patients included in the IBERICAN study [25].
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for the investigation with medicinal products (CEIm) of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos of Madrid on 21 February 2013 (C.P. IBERICAN-C.I. 13/047-E) and is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov with the number NCT02261441 (accessed on 1 November 2022).

2.2. Selection of Patients

Patients aged between 18 and 85 were recruited consecutively in primary care practices with the following inclusion criteria: (1) user of the National Health System, (2) residing in Spain during the last 5 years, (3) registered with the physician researcher, (4) signing the informed consent form. The exclusion criteria were (1) change of habitual residence to another town or country in the next 6 months, (2) terminal illness or reduced life expectancy in the next 5 years, (3) clear difficulty in being followed up in PC, or (4) refusal to form part of the cohort in the first place or to continue to be part of it during the follow-up. The estimated sample size has been detailed in previous publications [25].

2.3. Variables Recorded

Socio-demographic data of each patient were recorded in the entry visit (sex, age, habitat, level of education, family economic status, and current employment situation), as well as toxic habits (tobacco and alcohol consumption), family history of early CVD and personal history (HTN, DM, hypercholesterolemia, atrial fibrillation—AFIB-, HF, peripheral artery disease, or cerebrovascular disease), clinical parameters (weight, height, body mass index—BMI-, waist circumference, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure—PP-, and heart rate), information on the presence or absence of each CVRF as well as their treatment. The complementary tests recorded were lab tests (blood count, blood chemistry, and urine test) and electrocardiogram, which were considered valid if performed within the last 6 months before the patient’s inclusion. The equation CKD-EPI was used to calculate the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [26].
The HU was defined as uric acid levels above 6 mg/dL in women and 7 mg/dL in men, as set out in the guidelines on HTN of the European societies 2018 [27]. All other variables have been described in previous publications [25], and the CVRF together with their degree of control have been defined according to the respective clinical practice guidelines [21]. The term CVD includes here IHD, HF, peripheral artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease, as set out in the clinical practice guidelines [27].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Qualitative variables have been defined as percentages with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). For quantitative variables, the Shapiro–Wilk test has been used to check the data fitting to normal distribution. If the variable showed normal distribution, it has been described using the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation (SD); otherwise, the median and the interquartile range have been used.
The bivariate analysis has been performed using chi-square for qualitative variables, and ANOVA for quantitative variables, comparing patients with HU with patients without HU.
Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios adjusting (aOR), as the case may be, for socio-demographic variables (sex, age, level of education, habitat, employment, income, and race) or clinical variables. Results are presented with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Finally, a multivariate analysis was carried out to study the relationship of CVRF and demographic variables with HU. All analyses were performed with the program STATA version 16. We consider statistically significant a p-value < 0.05.

3. Results

The study included the 6927 patients with available data on uric acid levels. The prevalence of HU was 16.3% (95% CI: 15.4–17.1). Table 1 shows the prevalence of HU according to the patients’ socio-demographic characteristics. The risk of developing HU was lower in women (aOR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.64–0.84]) and increased with age (aOR: 1.02 [95% CI: 1.02–1.03]). The risk of HU was lower in rural habitats as against urban habitats (aOR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68–0.97]), and in patients with primary education (aOR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.64–0.99]) and with higher education (aOR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.51–0.96]) as against patients with lower educational level.
In total, 35.4% (95% CI: 32.6–38.3%) of patients with HU presented some form of sTOD. The sTOD which had the highest risk of HU was left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (aOR: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.00–1.83]) (Table 2).
A total of 23.9% of patients with HU presented CVD. A significantly higher prevalence of HU was observed in patients with AFIB (aOR: 1.53 [95% CI: 1.19–1.98]) (Table 2). The risk of HU was also higher in patients with kidney injuries, both in eGFR < 60 mL/min (aOR: 3.01 [95% CI: 2.40–3.78]) and in albuminuria (aOR: 1.43 [95% CI: 1.14–1.78]).
The model best-fitting model (Figure 1) includes the following variables: age and sex, abdominal obesity, HTN, HF, AFIB, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min, and use of thiazides. It can be seen that a pathological glomerular filtration, HF, abdominal obesity, HTN, use of thiazides, and albuminuria were associated with a higher risk of HU. On the other hand, being female and being actively employed were the only variables which were found to be protective factors.

4. Discussion

The results presented here, from a sample of 6927 patients recruited consecutively in PC, show that the prevalence of HU is 16.3%, and that the risk of HU increases in patients with both forms of kidney disease (albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min), HF, AFIB, and in the presence of CVRF such as HTN and abdominal obesity, as well as the use of thiazides. These associations have been described in various studies independently, although this is the first time that all the clinical and epidemiological variables are analyzed at the same time in a contemporary PC cohort. This has allowed us to analyze the risk of HU associated simultaneously with other variables, in order to be able to make the necessary adjustments in a multiple analysis.
The HU prevalence (16.3%) found in this study is slightly higher than other works that used the same cut-off points in neighbouring countries (13.9%) [28], or even in Asian cohorts (13.2% and 13.5%) [29,30]. Our sample shows a higher prevalence because it is a clinical practice sample, with a higher prevalence of CVRF and CVD than other population samples, as these three studies. In other ways, compared to these studies, we observed a higher prevalence in males and an increasing rate with age. This is usually because the uricemia levels increase in men aged 20 to 65 and in women older than 60; this explains that the prevalence of HU is higher in men when we analyze younger samples, and higher in women when we analyze older samples [31]. In view of this, we should consider whether, in order to define the HU as a risk factor, different cut-off points should be used not only by sex but also by age groups for both sexes. HU could be a secondary association with insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and obesity, which are associated with an inflammatory condition state. However, uric acid is part of the body’s antioxidant defences, and is still questioned if higher levels of uric acid are a protective response to damage or a cause of disease.
Our results, obtained from a cross-sectional analysis of the entry visit of the patients of the IBERICAN study, do not enable us to establish the causal link of these CVRF and HU. Nevertheless, these results reinforce the association with obesity [32], HTN [12,33], DM [34,35], MetS [36], and even a more atherogenic lipid profile [37]. After a slow reading of these results, it is not clear if the HU is a consequence of obesity and after favours the development of HTN, hypercholesterolemia, and DM [38]. This could be related to an increased activity of xanthine oxidase in obese patients [39], but there is not enough evidence in the literature to answer this question.
This study also allowed us to analyze the simultaneous coexistence of sTOD with CVRF and CVD. It has been observed that both albuminuria and LVH have a higher risk of associated HU. This is important because both lesions are closely linked with HTN [33,40,41], but also in patients with metabolic disorders such as obesity and DM [42,43]. Something similar happens to those CVD cases associated with a higher risk of HU, such as AFIB and HF, both directly related to HTN [44]. HU was also associated with a worse prognosis in patients after acute coronary disease [23,45]. Finally, the relationship between kidney disease and HU has been confirmed, which has already been described by other authors [46,47]. This relationship has a two-way effect between the two of them [48], where both the activation of inflammation [49] and the activation of the renin–angiotensin system [50] may be involved. All this evidence might reinforce the hypothesis stated above on the role of HU in the cardiovascular continuum, from the CVRF to CVD: HU is an early marker of CVR closely linked to obesity, since the pro-inflammatory role of uric acid has been described [51], and is considered one of the pathophysiological bases of atherosclerosis [52].
From a practical point of view, HU appears to be a risk marker that reflects the oxidative stress associated with a higher CVR, from the first stages to recurrent events, and the development of kidney disease and CVD. In the absence of treatments that improve the CV prognosis with the reduction of uric acid levels, identifying patients with higher levels of uric acid could be useful to identify individuals with a higher associated CVR, and who could benefit from a better control of CVRF, giving priority to obesity, in order to improve the CV prognosis. In parallel, a careful use of thiazides should be considered in patients with HTN, since the results of our multivariate analysis have shown that both affect the risk of HU. So, taking into account that it is a first-line drug for HTN [27] and a known cause of HU [8], and a known cause of HU, the avoidance of taking thiazides seems to be a reasonable strategy for preventing HU.

Strengths and Limitations

We believe that the results presented here are statistically robust and consistent with the available literature on this topic; in addition, they allow for a better understanding of the characteristics of the patients with HU in a contemporary cohort. The sample size is sufficient to analyze which CVRF are associated with HU, as well as the adjustment variables necessary for this study. However, our research also has limitations, some of which have been discussed in previous works [25,53], such as the voluntary participation of the investigators or the use of physical examination devices available in the practice with no regular calibration. In this sense, the information obtained in our analysis may not represent the global prevalence of HU in our country, but our main objective was to analyze the relationship between HU and other clinical situations related to cardiovascular risk including CVRF, TOD, and CVD. Despite these limitations, the authors consider it not to have influenced our findings.
Moreover, the cross-sectional design of the study does not allow us to establish causal relationships, although the aim of this study was to describe the patients’ characteristics and, therefore, its design is valid.
Lastly, in this research, the uric acid-lowering treatment of the patients was not recorded; therefore, it could not be included in the adjustment models. In this sense, it is possible that some patients classified as normouricemic would actually be HU. Even keeping that in mind, our results show the best situation, and by avoiding this bias, we would obtain more strength associations as we observed. Moreover, our results are similar to those of other authors published before, and they are biologically plausible. For these reasons, authors consider our findings answer our main research question.

5. Conclusions

Given the foregoing findings, it can be concluded that the risk of HU is greater in men, in the presence of CVRF such as HTN and abdominal obesity, and with the coexistence of LVH, AFIB, HF, and any form of kidney injury. These associations raise the possibility that the HU forms part of the early stages of the cardiovascular continuum, but it needs observational studies that confirm this hypothesis. However, it remains to be seen whether it is a cardiovascular risk factor and a possible therapeutic target to modify the CV prognosis, or a reflection of the existence of other metabolic disorders and of the oxidative stress characteristic of abdominal obesity which are mainly responsible for increasing the CV risk in this group of patients. If we can confirm this association, its presence in the early phases of the cardiovascular continuum makes it necessary to pay more attention in primary care to patients classified as low or moderate cardiovascular risk who have increased uric acid levels, since it could lead to reassessment of CVR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing: P.A.-P., M.Á.P.-D., R.M.M.-P., V.P.-C., S.V.-Z., J.P.-G., A.B.-G., L.G.-M., A.S.-F., F.V.-S., V.M.-S., Á.H.-A. and S.C.-S.; writing—original draft preparation: P.A.-P., M.Á.P.-D., R.M.M.-P., V.P.-C., A.S.-F., F.V.-S., V.M.-S., Á.H.-A. and S.C.-S.; supervision: P.A.-P., M.Á.P.-D., R.M.M.-P., V.P.-C., S.V.-Z., J.P.-G., A.B.-G., L.G.-M., A.S.-F., F.V.-S., V.M.-S., Á.H.-A. and S.C.-S.; project administration: S.C.-S.; funding acquisition: P.A.-P., M.Á.P.-D., R.M.M.-P., V.P.-C., S.V.-Z., J.P.-G., A.B.-G., L.G.-M., A.S.-F., F.V.-S., V.M.-S., Á.H.-A. and S.C.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The researchers: members of the Scientific Committee or the Steering Committee, general coordinator and principal investigator have not received any remuneration for participating in the IBERICAN study. The IBERICAN study is financed by the SEMERGEN Foundation with its own funds and has received aid to defray occasional expenses for statistical analysis and dissemination of results (AstraZeneca, Menarini).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ECCR of Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid on 21 February 2013 (C.P. IBERICAN-C.I. 13/047-E) and is registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov with the number NCT02261441 (Accessed on 1 November 2022). The information obtained was treated with absolute confidentiality, respecting the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants’ EHR data were anonymized upon extraction.

Informed Consent Statement

All patients, when invited to be included in the health system through their personalized identification system (PIS), gave their authorization to the Regional Ministry of Health (RMoH) so that the information contained in their EHR can also be used for research purposes, in compliance with data protection regulations.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this study.

Acknowledgments

To the SEMERGEN Foundation for funding the study, to the researchers who have actively participated in the recruitment of patients, and to the patients for their participation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. The Investigators of the IBERICAN Study and of the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) Foundation

Scientific Committee: Alfonso Barquilla García; Ángel Díaz Rodríguez; Carlos Escobar CervantesFrancisco Javier Alonso Moreno; Jesús Vergara Martín; Juan José Badimón; José Polo García; Luis Rodríguez Padial; Miguel Ángel Prieto; Rafael Vidal Pérez; Sergio Cinza Sanjurjo; Sonia Miravet Jiménez; Sonsoles Velilla Zancada, José Ramón Banegas, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Vicente Pallares Carratalá, Antonio Segura Fragoso y Rafael Manuel Micó Pérez.
Andalusia: Antonio López Téllez, Jesús Vergara Martin, María De Los Ángeles Ortega Osuna, Cristóbal Prieto Cid, Mª José Hidalgo Fajardo, José Lorente Serna, Ángel Domínguez Requena, Ricardo Alberola Cañizares, Manuel Ruiz Peña, Filomena Herrero Collado, Marcela Montes Vázquez, Rafael Ángel Carrascal Garrido, María Reyes Herrera Lozano, Beatriz Ortiz Oliva, Francisco José Anguita, Carmen Pérez Ibáñez, Carlos Alberto Cabrera Rodríguez, María José Cruz Rodríguez, Sandra Bonilla Ruiz, Rocío Reina González, Salome Abad Sánchez, Inmaculada Santana Martínez, Rafael Sánchez Jordán, Juan Mª Ramos Navas-Parejo, José Manuel Ramírez Torres, José María Beltrán Poveda, María Adoración De Cruz Benayas, Carmen Fernández Gil, Jon Iñaki Esturo Alcaine, Antonio Mora Quintero, Fernando Leiva Cepas, José Luis Carrasco Martín, Emilio García Criado, Mercedes Vázquez Blanco, Isabel Mora Ortiz, Leovigildo Ginel Mendoza, Juan Carlos Aguirre Rodríguez, Esperanza María Romero Rodríguez, José Acevedo Vázquez, Juan Gabriel García Ballesteros, María De La Paz Fernández Lara, Patricia Agüera Moreno, Eduardo Paños Maturana, Juan Manuel Ignacio Expósito, Noelia Carrillo Peñas, Carmen María Abad Faya, Ana Marina Almagro Duque, Rubén Torrescusa Camisón, Paloma Menéndez Polo, Marina Peña García, Cristina López Fernández, Ascensión Estepa Torres, Miguel Gutiérrez Jansen, Esperanza Loizaga González, Lisardo García Matarín, Enrique José Gamero De Luna, Javier Benítez Rivero, María José Gómez González, Carmen Gómez Montes, Juan Carlos Rodríguez Rodríguez, Juana María González Barranco, Josefa Ramírez Vizcaíno, María Ángeles Miranda Sánchez.
Aragón: Eva Trillo Calvo, Concepción Bayod Calvo, Susana Larripa De La Natividad, German Grasa Lambea, Emilio Jiménez Marín, Ana Cristina Navarro Gonzalvo, Antonio Pablo Martínez Barseló, Irene Peña León, Ángel González Pérez, Liliana Mahulea.
Asturias: María José Pérez Martínez, Ana Piera Carbonell, Margarita Alonso Fernández, María Montserrat Rueda Cuadrado, Rodrigo Abad Rodríguez, José Miguel Álvarez Cabo, Rubén Sánchez Rodríguez, Eva María Cano Cabo, Anny Romero Secin, Miguel Ángel Prieto Diaz, Juan Jesús García Fernández, Saul Suárez García.
Balearic Islands: Fernando García Romanos, Antonia Moreno González, María Lara Amengual Sastre, Susana Martínez Palli, José Alfonso Ramón Bauza, Jose Ortiz Bolinches, Carmen Fernández Fernández, María Isabel Orlandis Vázquez, Ana Sanchis Mezquita, Fernando Unceta Aramburu, Juan Fernando Peiró Morant, Ana Moyá Amengual, Mateu Seguí-Díaz. Basque Country: José Félix Zuazagoitia Nubla, Ana Echevarría Ituiño, Gregorio Mediavilla Tris, María Carmen Noriega Bosch, Esther González, María Luisa Ruiz Macho, Ruth Sendino Del Olmo, Asunción Olagorta De Prado, Ana López De Viñaspre Muguerza, Jesús Iturralde Iriso, Mª Rosario Virtus Iñurrieta, Lucas Ulloa Bahamonde.
Canary Islands: Isidro Godoy García, Fernando Rubio Sevillano, María Isabel González González, Marta Pérez Souto, Raquel De León Contreras, Sara Isabel Almeida González, Irene Almería Diez, Virginia María Mirabal Sánchez, Francisco Jose Escobar Lavado, Yoel Anta Pérez, Nayra Sánchez Hernández, Juan Luis Alonso Jerez, Ricardo Koch, Nayra Ramírez Mendoza, Héctor Suárez Hernández, Francisco Jesús Morales Escobar.
Cantabria: E. Lidia Gutiérrez Fernández, Fernando Andrés Mantecón, Ana Belén García Garrido, Asunción Vélez Escalante, Luisa Alonso Rentería, Jesús Sainz Jiménez, Guillermo Pombo Alles, Esperanza Rueda Alonso.
Castilla La Mancha: Juan Antonio Divisón Garrote, Pedro Martínez Sotodosos, Juan Antonio Vivancos Fuster, María García Palencia, José Ambrosio Torres Moraleda, Sara González Ballesteros, Ana Carmen Gil Adrados, Antonio González Cabrera, Miguel Ángel Babiano Fernández, Guillermo Rico García, Juan José Criado-Alvarez, Pilar Torres Moreno, Francisco Javier Arribas Aguirregaviria, Alicia Sahuquillo Martínez, Lourdes María Santos Bejar, Miguel Laborda Peralta, Raúl Piedra Castro, Carlos Santos Altozano, Lucia González-Tarrio Polo, Pedro Valiente Maresca, Reinilda Mota Santana, Noemi Elizabeth Terrero Ledesma, Noelia Garrido Espada, Francisco Javier Alonso Moreno, Gabriela Delia Rosa Zambrana Calvi, Cristina de Castro Mesa, Blanca Cordero García, Pilar Sorrius Sitges, Ana María de Santiago Nocito, César Lozano Suárez.
Castilla y León: Juan Lorenzo Gutiérrez Montero, Juan Ignacio López Gil, María Dolores Fernández Ortega, Miren Elizari Roncal, María Ascensión López Serrano, Nuria Esther Adrián De La Fuente, Belén Angulo Fdez. De Larrea, Naiara Cubelos Fernández, Guiomar Luz Ferreiro Gómez, Diana Gómez Rodríguez, Sonia María Andrés Tuñón, María Ajenjo González, Serafín De Abajo Olea, Juan José León Regueras, César Manuel Gallego Nieto, Delio Vázquez Mallada, María De La O Gutiérrez García, Pablo Baz Rodríguez, José Ignacio Ferradal García, Blanca Delia De Román Martínez, Ana Arconada Pérez, Omar Mahmoud Atoui, Álvaro Morán Bayón, María Teresa Armenteros Del Olmo, Francisco Javier García-Norro Herreros, Enrique Méndez Rodríguez, Diana María Narganes Pineda, Ángel Díaz Rodríguez, Verónica Ortiz Ainaga, Milagros Sonlei Sánchez Guevara, Laura Villota Ferreiro, M Teresa Grande Grande, Francisco Vicente Martínez Gracia, Jesús Palomo del Arco.
Catalonia: María Dolores Moriano García, Beatriz Jiménez Muñoz, Gemma Rovira Marcelino, Diana Elizabeth Fernández Valverde, Roser Rodó Bernadó, María Teresa Ortiz Lupiañez, Najlaa Najih, José María Diéguez Parra, Mª Rosa Benedicto Acebo, Mari Luz Bravo Vicien, Alberto Ramón León Estella, Juan Antonio Muñoz Gómez, Alicia Mostazo Muntané, Isabel Ortega Abarca, Anna Gasol Fargas, Brenda Elizabeth Riesgo Escudero, Susana Elizabeth Riesgo, Edgar Zaballos Castellvi, Celia Cols Sagarra, Marta Herranz Fernández, Josep Alins Presas, Idaira Damas Pérez, Rosa M Alcolea García, Ines Monte Collado, Roberto Genique Martínez, María José Guasch Villanueva, Sònia Miravet Jiménez, Teresa Rama Martínez, Lucio Pinto Pena, Josefa María Panisello Royo, Inés Gil Gil, Carlos Gómez Ruiz, Rita Sahun Font, Anna Fuentes Lloveras.
Community of Madrid: Alberto Calderón Montero, María Del Mar Zamora Gómez, Elena Alarcón Cebrián, Mª José Piñero Acin, Celia Pecharroman Sacristán, M Soledad Mayayo Vicente, Mª Paz Pérez Unanua, Nuria Marañón Henrich, Saray Gómez Monreal, Sonia Redondo De Pedro, Blanca Sanz Pozo, Irene Moreno Martínez, Beatriz López Uriarte, Carmelina Sanz Velasco, Amaya Gárriz Aguirre, Montserrat Rivera Teijido, German Reviriego Jaén, José Ignacio Aza Pascual-Salcedo, Josefa Vázquez Gallego, Julia Caballer Rodilla, Aida Herrera, Ezequiel Arranz Martínez, Ana María Gómez Calvo, Paula Morán Oliva, Mª Milagros González Béjar, Julio Antonio Heras Hitos, Olga Garcia Vallejo, Manuel De Jesús Frías Vargas, María Jesús Castillejo Boguerin, Aurora García Lerín, Miguel Ángel María Tablado, Elena Concepción García García, Leticia De Miguel Acero, Carmen Zárate Oñate, Aránzazu Barranco Apoita, María Ester Montes Belloso, Ana Maria Huertas Velasco, Rafael Sáez Jiménez, Julia Natividad García Pascual, María Clemencia Zuluaga Zuluaga, Mª Cruz Díez Pérez, Antonio Ruiz García, Cristina Murillo Jelsbak, Virginia Lasso Oria, Amelia González Gamarra, Elena Rodilla Rodilla, Alberto Galgo Nafría, María Mestre de Juan, Mª Carmen García Albiñana, Mª del Pilar Moreno Cano, Paula Hernanz López, Paloma Casado Pérez.
Extremadura: Jacinto Espinosa García, José Ignacio Prieto Romo, Leandro Fernández Fernández, Javier Sierratapia, Nieves Moreno Regidor, Francisco Javier Zaballos Sánchez, Ana Moreno Moreno, Francisco Carramiñana Barrera, Juan José Torres Vázquez, María José Gamero Samino, Miguel Ángel De Santiago Rodríguez, Pablo Rafael Gómez Martínez, Antonio Carlos Elías Becerra, Javier Soto Olivera, Víctor Cambero, Julián Domínguez Ávila, Andrés Simón Fuentes, Jorge Manuel De Nicolás Jiménez, Dimas Igual Fraile, Guadalupe Nieto Barco, Ignacio Araujo Ramos, Mª Luz Serrano Berrocal, Francisco Buitrago Ramírez, Minerva Gallego Marcos, Félix Suarez González, Victoriano Chavero Carrasco, José Polo García, Francisco Guerra Peguero, Francisco Javier Sánchez Vega, Manuel Tejero Mas, Alba Palmerín Donoso, Miguel Turégano Yedro, María Beatriz Esteban Rojas, Fátima Cabezudo Moreno, Nawson Elver Quevedo Saldaña, María Del Mar García Fenés, Alfonso Barquilla García, Timotea Garrote Florencio, José María Fernández Toro, Vicente Caballero Pajares, María José Gómez Barquero.
Galicia: Alejandra Rey Rañal, Elena García Del Río, Enrique Nieto Pol, Julio Álvarez Fernández, Pilar Alonso Álvarez, Mª Luisa Jorge Gómez, Antonio Calvo Guerrero, Isabel Celemín Colomina, Lucia Barreiro Casal, Juana Fernández Moreno, Mª Angelines Carballal Martínez, Nabor Díaz Rodríguez, Carlos Moral Paredes, Dolores Recarey García, Francisco Javier Iglesias Mato, Antonio Fouz Ulloa, Amparo Fidalgo González, Noelia Dios Parada, Patricia Conde Sabarís, Ana Isabel Rodríguez Pérez, Ana Inés García Palacio, Víctor Julio Quesada Varela, Lidia Romero Iglesias, Ángel Lado Llerena, Carmen Lires Rodríguez, María Luisa Carretero Díaz, José Carreira Arias, José Luís Vázquez Camino, María Del Carmen Torreiro Penas, Sandra Yáñez Freire, Sergio Cinza Sanjurjo, Daniel Rey Aldana, Carlos Piñeiro Díaz, Portal González Lorenzo, José Rodríguez Campos, Rubén Blanco Rodríguez, Manuel Portela Romero, Lucía Vilela de Castro.
La Rioja: Sonsoles María Velilla Zancada, Rafael Crespo Sabarís, Oscar Fernando Isaula Jiménez. Melilla: Jesús Manuel Gonzalez Puga, Jorge Antonio Benaín Ávila, Óscar Del Toro González. Murcia: Vicente Llorca Bueno, Ana María Ballesteros Pérez, Domingo J. Rubira López, Mª Dolores Esteve Franco, Elena Sánchez Pablo, María Teresa Palacios López, Juan Castillo Meroño, José María Lobo Martínez, Isabel María Peral Martinez, J. Eduardo Carrasco Carrasco, Armando Santo González, Juan Gomáriz García, Beatriz Ríos Morata.
Navarra: Laura Sánchez Iñigo, Inés Sanz Pérez.
Valencian Community: Vicente Pascual Fuster, Mª Dolores Aicart Bort, Natividad Vázquez Gómez, Carlos Lluna Gasco, Teresa Amorós Barber, Pedro Antonio Medina Cano, Miguel Monteagudo Moncho, Mª Jesús Larré Muñoz, Raquel Navarro Hernández, Francisco José Martínez Egea, Antonio Tramontano, Marta Ferrer Royo, Belén Persiva Saura, Juan A. Contreras Torres, José Mª Tirado Moliner, Alejandro Salanova Penalba, Ariadna Cucó Alberola, Fernando María Navarro I Ros, Enrique Beltrán Llicer, Ana Seoane Novás, Inmaculada Martín Valls, Gracia Verdú Mahiques, Enrique Peña Forcada, Nieves Aguilar Gómez, Francisco Javier Sanz García, M Dolores Paradís Bueso, María Eugenia Alegre Romero, Antonio Francés Camus, María Amparo Anton Peinado, Rosa Latorre Santos, Mª Asunción Palomar Marín, María Carmen Botella García, Eva Sánchez Fresquet, Pedro Sala Paños, Tomás Sánchez Ruiz, Rosa Ana Valero Valero, María Seoane Vicente, Magdalena Martin Llinares, Antonio Masiá Alegre, José Luis Llisterri Caro, Irene Lluch Verdu, Vicente Pallarés-Carratalá, Francisco Valls Roca, Rafael Manuel Micó Pérez, Carmen Barceló Dupuy, Elena Benages Vicente, María José Gimeno Tortajada, Mercedes Calleja del Ser, Martín Menéndez Rodríguez, Rosalía Victoria Carbonell Castelló.

References

  1. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Defunciones Según La Causa de Muerte. In Enero-Mayo 2019 y 2020; Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Madrid, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Soriano, J.B.; Rojas-Rueda, D.; Alonso, J.; Antó, J.M.; Cardona, P.-J.; Fernández, E.; Garcia-Basteiro, A.L.; Benavides, F.G.; Glenn, S.D.; Krish, V.; et al. La Carga de Enfermedad En España: Resultados Del Estudio de La Carga Global de Las Enfermedades 2016. Med. Clin. 2018, 151, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. O’Flaherty, M.; Buchan, I.; Capewell, S. Contributions of Treatment and Lifestyle to Declining CVD Mortality: Why Have CVD Mortality Rates Declined so Much since the 1960s? Heart 2013, 99, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Maseri, A. Inflammation and Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002, 105, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Corry, D.B.; Tuck, M.L. Uric Acid and the Vasculature. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2006, 8, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bagnati, M.; Perugini, C.; Cau, C.; Bordone, R.; Albano, E.; Bellomo, G. When and Why a Water-Soluble Antioxidant Becomes pro-Oxidant during Copper-Induced Low-Density Lipoprotein Oxidation: A Study Using Uric Acid. Biochem. J. 1999, 340, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Corry, D.B.; Eslami, P.; Yamamoto, K.; Nyby, M.D.; Makino, H.; Tuck, M.L. Uric Acid Stimulates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Oxidative Stress via the Vascular Renin–Angiotensin System. J. Hypertens. 2008, 26, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kanellis, J.; Watanabe, S.; Li, J.H.; Kang, D.H.; Li, P.; Nakagawa, T.; Wamsley, A.; Sheikh-Hamad, D.; Lan, H.Y.; Feng, L.; et al. Uric Acid Stimulates Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Production in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Cyclooxygenase-2. Hypertension 2003, 41, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Patetsios, P.; Rodino, W.; Wisselink, W.; Bryan, D.; Kirwin, J.D.; Panetta, T.F. Identification of Uric Acid in AorticAneurysms and Atherosclerotic Artery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1996, 800, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Desideri, G.; Castaldo, G.; Lombardi, A.; Mussap, M.; Testa, A.; Pontremoli, R.; Punzi, L.; Borghi, C. Is It Time to Revise the Normal Range of Serum Uric Acid Levels? Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 18, 1295–1306. [Google Scholar]
  11. Verdecchia, P.; Schillaci, G.; Reboldi, G.; Santeusanio, F.; Porcellati, C.; Brunetti, P. Relation Between Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Essential Hypertension. Hypertension 2000, 36, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.; Gu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, G.; Wu, H.; Du, H.; Shi, H.; Xia, Y.; Guo, X.; et al. Serum Uric Acid Is an Independent Predictor for Developing Prehypertension: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.Y.; Kao, T.W.; Yang, H.F.; Chou, C.W.; Wu, C.J.; Lai, C.H.; Sun, Y.S.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, W.L. The Association of Uric Acid with the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome, Arterial Hypertension or Diabetes in Young Subjects—An Observational Study. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 478, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lurbe, E.; Torro, M.I.; Alvarez-Pitti, J.; Redon, J.; Borghi, C.; Redon, P. Uric Acid Is Linked to Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight and Obese Youths. J. Hypertens. 2018, 36, 1840–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rocha, E.P.A.A.; Vogel, M.; Stanik, J.; Pietzner, D.; Willenberg, A.; Körner, A.; Kiess, W. Serum Uric Acid Levels as an Indicator for Metabolically Unhealthy Obesity in Children and Adolescents. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2018, 90, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cicero, A.F.G.; Fogacci, F.; Giovannini, M.; Grandi, E.; Rosticci, M.; D’Addato, S.; Borghi, C. Serum Uric Acid Predicts Incident Metabolic Syndrome in the Elderly in an Analysis of the Brisighella Heart Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Franssen, W.M.A.; Beyens, M.; Al Hatawe, T.; Frederix, I.; Verboven, K.; Dendale, P.; Eijnde, B.O.; Massa, G.; Hansen, D. Cardiac Function in Adolescents with Obesity: Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Impact on Physical Fitness. Int. J. Obes. 2019, 43, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chang, H.-Y.; Lee, P.-H.; Lei, C.-C.; Tung, C.-W.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Huang, T.-J.; Lu, L.; Lin, C.-L. Hyperuricemia Is an Independent Risk Factor for New Onset Micro-Albuminuria in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: A Prospective Cohort Study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Culleton, B.F.; Larson, M.G.; Kannel, W.B.; Levy, D. Serum Uric Acid and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease and Death: The Framingham Heart Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 131, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maloberti, A.; Giannattasio, C.; Bombelli, M.; Desideri, G.; Cicero, A.F.G.; Muiesan, M.L.; Rosei, E.A.; Salvetti, M.; Ungar, A.; Rivasi, G.; et al. Hyperuricemia and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes: The Experience of the URRAH (Uric Acid Right for Heart Health) Project. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2020, 27, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maloberti, A.; Bombelli, M.; Facchetti, R.; Barbagallo, C.M.; Bernardino, B.; Rosei, E.A.; Casiglia, E.; Cicero, A.F.G.; Cirillo, M.; Cirillo, P.; et al. Relationships between Diuretic-Related Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Events: Data from the URic Acid Right for HeArt Health Study. J. Hypertens. 2021, 39, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. de Leeuw, P.W.; Thijs, L.; Birkenhäger, W.H.; Voyaki, S.M.; Efstratopoulos, A.D.; Fagard, R.H.; Leonetti, G.; Nachev, C.; Petrie, J.C.; Rodicio, J.L.; et al. Prognostic Significance of Renal Function in Elderly Patients with Isolated Systolic Hypertension: Results from the Syst-Eur Trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 2213–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ndrepepa, G.; Braun, S.; Haase, H.U.; Schulz, S.; Ranftl, S.; Hadamitzky, M.; Mehilli, J.; Schömig, A.; Kastrati, A. Prognostic Value of Uric Acid in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 109, 1260–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, G.; Qin, J.; Deng, X.; Luo, G.; Yu, D.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, S.; Wang, L. Prognostic Value of Serum Uric Acid in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine 2019, 98, e14525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cinza Sanjurjo, S.; Llisterri Caro, J.L.; Barquilla García, A.; Polo García, J.; Velilla Zancada, S.; Rodríguez Roca, G.C.; Micó Pérez, R.M.; Martín Sánchez, V.; Prieto Díaz, M.Á. Descripción de La Muestra, Diseño y Métodos Del Estudio Para La Identificación de La Población Española de Riesgo Cardiovascular y Renal (IBERICAN). Med. Fam. Semer. 2020, 46, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matsushita, K.; Mahmoodi, B.K.; Woodward, M.; Emberson, J.R.; Jafar, T.H.; Jee, S.H.; Polkinghorne, K.R.; Shankar, A.; Smith, D.H.; Tonelli, M.; et al. Comparison of Risk Prediction Using the CKD-EPI Equation and the MDRD Study Equation for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate. JAMA 2012, 307, 1941–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Agabiti Rosei, E.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2018, 36, 2284–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cinza-Sanjurjo, S.; Micó-Pérez, R.M.; Velilla-Zancada, S.; Prieto-Díaz, M.A.; Rodríguez-Roca, G.C.; Barquilla García, A.; Polo García, J.; Martín Sánchez, V.; Llisterri Caro, J.L. Factores Asociados al Riesgo Cardiovascular y Enfermedad Cardiovascular y Renal En El Estudio IBERICAN (Identificación de La PoBlación Española de RIesgo CArdiovascular y ReNal): Resultados Definitivos. Med. Fam. Semer. 2020, 46, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maloberti, A.; Maggioni, S.; Occhi, L.; Triglione, N.; Panzeri, F.; Nava, S.; Signorini, S.; Falbo, R.; Casati, M.; Grassi, G.; et al. Sex-Related Relationships between Uric Acid and Target Organ Damage in Hypertension. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2018, 20, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Miao, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, F.; Sun, R.; et al. Dietary and Lifestyle Changes Associated with High Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Gout in the Shandong Coastal Cities of Eastern China. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, X.-B.; Zhang, W.-Q.; Tang, W.-W.; Liu, Y.; Ning, Y.; Huang, C.; Liu, J.-X.; Yi, Y.-J.; Xu, R.-H.; Wang, T.-D. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Hyperuricemia among Urban Adults Aged 35–79 Years in Southwestern China: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zitt, E.; Fischer, A.; Lhotta, K.; Concin, H.; Nagel, G. Sex- and Age-Specific Variations, Temporal Trends and Metabolic Determinants of Serum Uric Acid Concentrations in a Large Population-Based Austrian Cohort. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kuwabara, M.; Kuwabara, R.; Niwa, K.; Hisatome, I.; Smits, G.; Roncal-Jimenez, C.; MacLean, P.; Yracheta, J.; Ohno, M.; Lanaspa, M.; et al. Different Risk for Hypertension, Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Hyperuricemia According to Level of Body Mass Index in Japanese and American Subjects. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kanbay, M.; Girerd, N.; Machu, J.-L.; Bozec, E.; Duarte, K.; Boivin, J.-M.; Wagner, S.; Ferreira, J.P.; Zannad, F.; Rossignol, P. Impact of Uric Acid on Hypertension Occurrence and Target Organ Damage: Insights From the STANISLAS Cohort With a 20-Year Follow-Up. Am. J. Hypertens. 2020, 33, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jia, Z.; Zhang, X.; Kang, S.; Wu, Y. Serum Uric Acid Levels and Incidence of Impaired Fasting Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013, 101, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, S.C.; Liu, J.; Solomon, D.H. Risk of Incident Diabetes in Patients with Gout: A Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Liu, K.; Chen, F.; Tang, X.; Li, G.; Hu, D.; Song, G. Sex-Specific Association of Serum Uric Acid Dynamics with the Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome in a Health Check-up Chinese Population: A Prospective Cohort Study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e035289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Song, W.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Ou, J.; Wei, Q.; Gu, J. The Comparison of Dyslipidemia and Serum Uric Acid in Patients with Gout and Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. de Magalhães, E.L.G.; Juvanhol, L.L.; da Silva, D.C.G.; Ferreira, F.G.; Roberto, D.M.T.; Hinnig, P.D.F.; Longo, G.Z. Uric Acid: A New Marker for Metabolic Syndrome? Results of a Population-Based Study with Adults. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2077–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baldwin, W.; McRae, S.; Marek, G.; Wymer, D.; Pannu, V.; Baylis, C.; Johnson, R.J.; Sautin, Y.Y. Hyperuricemia as a Mediator of the Proinflammatory Endocrine Imbalance in the Adipose Tissue in a Murine Model of the Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes 2011, 60, 1258–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Visco, V.; Pascale, A.V.; Virtuoso, N.; Mongiello, F.; Cinque, F.; Gioia, R.; Finelli, R.; Mazzeo, P.; Manzi, M.V.; Morisco, C.; et al. Serum Uric Acid and Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chernatska, O.M.; Prystupa, L.N.; Fadieieva, H.A.; Liashenko, A.V.; Smiianova, Y.O. Arterial Hypertension Associated with Hyperuricemia: Features of Heart Damage. Wiad. Lek. 2020, 73, 943–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Yan, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, K.K.; Chu, C.; Hu, J.W.; Ma, Q.; Liao, Y.Y.; Fu, B.W.; et al. Association of Uric Acid in Serum and Urine with Subclinical Renal Damage: Hanzhong Adolescent Hypertension Study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Muiesan, M.L.; Agabiti-Rosei, C.; Paini, A.; Salvetti, M. Uric Acid and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update. Eur. Cardiol. 2016, 11, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kawada, T. Risk of cardiovascular and all-cause events in hyperuricemia patients with special reference to diuretic use. J. Hypertens. 2022, 40, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Eun, Y.; Han, K.-D.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, I.Y.; Park, E.-J.; Lee, S.; Cha, H.-S.; Koh, E.-M.; Lee, J.; Kim, H. Increased Overall Heart Rate Irregularity Risk by Hyperuricemia in the General Population: Results from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medicina 2020, 56, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cicero, A.F.G.; Kuwabara, M.; Johnson, R.; Bove, M.; Fogacci, F.; Rosticci, M.; Giovannini, M.; D’Addato, S.; Borghi, C. LDL-Oxidation, Serum Uric Acid, Kidney Function and Pulse-Wave Velocity: Data from the Brisighella Heart Study Cohort. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 261, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Oh, T.R.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, C.S.; Bae, E.H.; Ma, S.K.; Sung, S.-A.; Kim, Y.-S.; Oh, K.H.; Ahn, C.; Kim, S.W. Hyperuricemia Has Increased the Risk of Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: Propensity Score Matching Analysis from the KNOW-CKD Study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Russo, E.; Verzola, D.; Leoncini, G.; Cappadona, F.; Esposito, P.; Pontremoli, R.; Viazzi, F. Treating Hyperuricemia: The Last Word Hasn’t Been Said Yet. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moriel, P.; Sevanian, A.; Ajzen, S.; Zanella, M.T.; Plavnik, F.L.; Rubbo, H.; Abdalla, D.S.P. Nitric Oxide, Cholesterol Oxides and Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Plasma of Patients with Essential Hypertension. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2002, 35, 1301–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Forman, J.P.; Choi, H.; Curhan, G.C. Uric Acid and Insulin Sensitivity and Risk of Incident Hypertension. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tsushima, Y.; Nishizawa, H.; Tochino, Y.; Nakatsuji, H.; Sekimoto, R.; Nagao, H.; Shirakura, T.; Kato, K.; Imaizumi, K.; Takahashi, H.; et al. Uric Acid Secretion from Adipose Tissue and Its Increase in Obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 27138–27149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Akbari, P.; Khorasani-Zadeh, A. Thiazide Diuretics; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Multivariate analysis for the risk of hyperuricemia.
Figure 1. Multivariate analysis for the risk of hyperuricemia.
Jcm 12 00050 g001
Table 1. Distribution in the prevalence of hyperuricemia according to various socio-demographic variables.
Table 1. Distribution in the prevalence of hyperuricemia according to various socio-demographic variables.
VariableNn%OR 95% CIaOR 95% CI
SexMan318859718.70.72 [0.63–0.81]0.73 [0.64–0.84]
Female373952914.1
RaceWhite6678109716.4
Others2492911.60.67 [0.45–0.99]0.78 [0.52–1.16]
HabitatUrban406168316.8
Semi-urban147423716.10.95 [0.81–1.11]0.97 [0.82–1.15]
Rural139020614.80.86 [0.73–1.02]0.82 [0.68–0.97]
EducationUneducated62713621.7
Primary381462216.30.70 [0.57–0.87]0.80 [0.64–0.99]
Secondary156125116.10.69 [0.55–0.87]0.88 [0.67–1.14]
Tertiary92511712.60.52 [0.40–0.69]0.70 [0.51–0.96]
EmploymentEmployed291440413.9
Unemployed5696912.10.86 [0.65–1.13]0.88 [0.66–1.17]
Retired248551420.71.62 [1.04–1.87]0.93 [0.76–1.14]
Student7667.90.53 [0.23–1.23]0.95 [0.40–2.24]
Domestic chores86113115.21.11 [0.90–1.38]0.92 [0.71–1.18]
Salary (EUR/year)<18,000292049016.8
≥18,000 400763615.90.94 [0.82–1.06]1.01 [0.87–1.16]
Age, mean (SD)HU62.7 (13.3) 1.02 [1.02–1.03]1.02 [1.02–1.03]
No HU57.9 (14.7)
OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; aOR = odds ratio adjusted for sex, race, habitat, education level, employment, salary, and age. HU = hyperuricemia. Age is presented as mean and standard deviation (SD).
Table 2. Distribution in the prevalence of hyperuricemia according to cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage, and history of cardiovascular disease.
Table 2. Distribution in the prevalence of hyperuricemia according to cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage, and history of cardiovascular disease.
VariableNn%OR 95% CIaOR 95% CI
CVRFAbdominal ObesityNo469157312.22.25 [1.97–2.58]1.56 [1.09–2.24]
Yes207451324.7
ObesityNo444553111.92.20 [1.92–2.52]1.29 [0.90–1.84]
Yes232055523.9
HTNNo34693409.82.31 [1.97–2.70]1.95 [1.66–2.30]
Yes329274622.7
HypercholesterolemiaNo331942212.71.32 [1.15–1.52]1.19 [1.03–1.37]
Yes344366419.3
SedentaryNo479571314.91.31 [1.14–1.51]1.12 [0.97–1.30]
Yes197037318.9
DMNo540680414.91.19 [1.02–1.39]0.93 [0.79–1.10]
Yes135928220.8
SmokingNo559192816.60.91 [0.75–1.10]0.94 [0.79–1.15]
Yes117415813.5
TODPP > 60No560282914.81.13 [0.94–1.36]1.1 [0.92–1.32]
Yes116325722.1
Left ventricular
hypertrophy
No6516102215.71.44 [1.07–1.94]1.36 [1.00–1.83]
Yes2496425.7
ABI < 0.9No66361060161.14 [0.73–1.77]1.06 [0.68–1.66]
Yes1292620.2
History of
cardiovascular
disease
StrokeNo6491103015.91.10 [0.81–1.5]1.00 [0.73–1.37]
Yes2745620.4
Ischemic heart
disease
No627799615.90.96 [0.75–1.22]0.89 [0.69–1.14]
Yes4889018.4
Atrial fibrillationNo638697315.21.76 [1.39–2.23]1.53 [1.19–1.98]
Yes37911329.8
Heart failureNo6582102115.52.31 [1.68–3.18]2.02 [1.44–2.83]
Yes1836535.5
Peripheral Artery
Disease
No65481045160.98 [0.69–1.39]0.88 [0.62–1.27]
Yes2174118.9
Kidney
disease
eGFR < 60 mL/minNo621285913.83.66 [3.01–4.46]3.01 [2.40–3.78]
Yes54822641.2
AlbuminuriaNo450068715.31.70 [1.38–2.11]1.43 [1.14–1.78]
Yes54614326.2
OR = adjusted for sex, race, habitat, education level, employment, salary, and age; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; aOR = adjusted for sex, race, habitat, education level, employment, salary, and age plus the variables included in its group: CVRF, TOD or CVD. CVRF: cardiovascular risk factors; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; TOD: target organ damage; PP: pulse pressure; ABI: ankle-brachial index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antelo-Pais, P.; Prieto-Díaz, M.Á.; Micó-Pérez, R.M.; Pallarés-Carratalá, V.; Velilla-Zancada, S.; Polo-García, J.; Barquilla-García, A.; Ginel-Mendoza, L.; Segura-Fragoso, A.; Vitelli-Storelli, F.; et al. Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Its Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Subclinical Target Organ Damage. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010050

AMA Style

Antelo-Pais P, Prieto-Díaz MÁ, Micó-Pérez RM, Pallarés-Carratalá V, Velilla-Zancada S, Polo-García J, Barquilla-García A, Ginel-Mendoza L, Segura-Fragoso A, Vitelli-Storelli F, et al. Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Its Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Subclinical Target Organ Damage. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antelo-Pais, Paula, Miguel Ángel Prieto-Díaz, Rafael M. Micó-Pérez, Vicente Pallarés-Carratalá, Sonsoles Velilla-Zancada, José Polo-García, Alfonso Barquilla-García, Leovigildo Ginel-Mendoza, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Facundo Vitelli-Storelli, and et al. 2023. "Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Its Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Subclinical Target Organ Damage" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop