Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Enzymatic Activities of Oceanic Pelagic Fungal Strains and the Influence of Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Torulaspora delbrueckii Phenotypic and Metabolic Profiling towards Its Biotechnological Exploitation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/jof8060570
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethylene Promotes Expression of the Appressorium- and Pathogenicity-Related Genes via GPCR- and MAPK-Dependent Manners in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides

by
Dandan Ren
†,
Tan Wang
†,
Ganghan Zhou
,
Weiheng Ren
,
Xiaomin Duan
,
Lin Gao
,
Jiaxu Chen
,
Ling Xu
* and
Pinkuan Zhu
*
School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(6), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060570
Submission received: 23 April 2022 / Revised: 20 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ethylene (ET) represents a signal that can be sensed by plant pathogenic fungi to accelerate their spore germination and subsequent infection. However, the molecular mechanisms of responses to ET in fungi remain largely unclear. In this study, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was investigated via transcriptomic analysis to reveal the genes that account for the ET-regulated fungal development and virulence. The results showed that ET promoted genes encoding for fungal melanin biosynthesis enzymes, extracellular hydrolases, and appressorium-associated structure proteins at 4 h after treatment. When the germination lasted until 24 h, ET induced multiple appressoria from every single spore, but downregulated most of the genes. Loss of selected ET responsive genes encoding for scytalone dehydratase (CgSCD1) and cerato-platanin virulence protein (CgCP1) were unable to alter ET sensitivity of C. gloeosporioides in vitro but attenuated the influence of ET on pathogenicity. Knockout of the G-protein-coupled receptors CgGPCR3-1/2 and the MAPK signaling pathway components CgMK1 and CgSte11 resulted in reduced ET sensitivity. Taken together, this study in C. gloeosporioides reports that ET can cause transcription changes in a large set of genes, which are mainly responsible for appressorium development and virulence expression, and these processes are dependent on the GPCR and MAPK pathways.

1. Introduction

Fresh fruits are valuable dietary sources for human health; however, they are also attractive targets for phytopathogenic fungi, leading to fruit decay and economic losses. As the fruits ripen and senescence, the physicochemical properties of the host tissues become increasingly susceptible to microorganism infections. On the other side, the pathogens should be capable of recognizing fruit ripening status to orchestrate their infection activities, although the mechanisms by which they do this remain unclear.
The gaseous phytohormone ethylene (ET) is involved in many aspects of plant growth and development, including senescence, organ abscission, and fruit ripening [1,2,3]. In plants, ET is perceived by transmembrane-receptor proteins localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) belonging to the ET receptor family that harbors homology to bacterial two-component histidine kinases [4,5]. The ET signal transduction pathway in plants ultimately leads to regulating the expression of ET-dependent genes [6,7]. In flesh fruits, ET regulates ripening by coordinating the expression of genes that participate in multiple biological processes, such as the increase in respiration, autocatalytic ET production, pigment accumulation, change in texture, and the buildup of overall fruit quality traits [8]. As such, ET is known as the fruit-ripening hormone. Because of its gaseous nature, ET can diffuse rapidly throughout plant materials, cross cell membranes, and escape the plant as an environmental signal, which could play important roles in interactions between host plants and pathogenic microbes [9].
In contrast to healthy fruits, the diseased ones usually release notably increased ET, which can thereby stimulate the ripening and rotting of nearby fruits, fulfilling the probable capacity of ET to accelerate fruit spoilage in holistic scales [10,11]. ET is also involved in a variety of plant defense responses to microbial attacks [12,13]. A large number of studies have shown that, depending on the nature of the plant–microbe interaction, ET may reduce, enhance, or have no effect on disease development [14]. Most studies have focused on the roles of ET signaling in the immunity of host plants, leading to the commonly accepted view that ET and jasmonic acid signaling components are involved in resistance against necrotrophic pathogens [15,16]. However, the effects of ET on the pathogen side are relatively less understood.
It is noteworthy that plant pathogenic fungi are capable of sensing ET. For example, ET can promote the spore germination and appressorium formation of Colletotrichum spp. [17]; In contrast, 100 ppm and 1000 ppm exogenous ET released by ethephon mildly inhibited the spore germination of Botrytis spp., while low concentrations of ET showed a negligible effect [18]. Treatment of B. cinerea with 2,5-norbornadiene, a kind of ET receptor competition inhibitor, can inhibit the germination of spores, while ET can eliminate the inhibitory effect [19]. Similar phenomena have been found in Alternaria alternata [20]. Additionally, the expression of the pathogenic gene bcspl1 of B. cinerea could be induced by ET [21]. In Aspergillus flavus, ET can suppress aflatoxin production, and inhibit the expression of aflatoxin-synthetic genes (aflR and aflD) [20,22]. However, the effect of ET on the overall gene expression profiles of plant pathogenic fungi has not been reported yet, leaving a knowledge gap in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effects of ET on fungal growth, development, and pathogenicity.
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is one of the most common pathogens causing postharvest diseases in varied fruits and vegetables [23,24,25]. C. gloeosporioides is a characteristically hemibiotrophic fungus that can survive in the plant cuticle or epidermal cells until the fruits ripen [26]. In other words, C. gloeosporioides prefers to remain under the latent infection stage in immature fruits and vegetables, with the anthracnose symptoms occurring as the host matures. The conidia of C. gloeosporioides can form a typical dome-shaped infection structure called appressorium [27]. The fungal spores need to spend their substance storage inside to provide energy for the formation of appressoria, and then rely on the newly developed cell structures to infect plants and obtain nutrients to maintain the growth and reproduction [28,29]. C. gloeosporioides represents a typical plant pathogenic fungus showing obvious ET-sensitive responses, which include spore germination and appressorium formation [17]. Therefore, ET may be recognized as a signal of fruit ripening by this pathogenic fungus to initiate the occurrence and development of anthracnose disease.
The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell surface receptors in eukaryotes, sensing sense environmental cues to initiate intracellular G-protein signaling that coordinates biological responses [30,31]. In Magnaporthe grisea, the G protein subunits, MagB and Mgb1, are required in a cAMP-dependent manner for recognition of host surface hydrophobicity during appressorium formation [32,33]. However, cAMP does not rescue defects in appressorial penetration and infectious growth in Mgb1 and Mgg1 mutation strains [33,34]. In addition, the putative GPCR Pth11 also regulates appressorium formation, presumably through sensing surface hydrophobicity and plant cutin monomers [35]. Thus, Pth11/MagB/Mgb1/Mgg1 could comprise a GPCR/G protein system that controls appressorium differentiation in response to molecular cues from the host plant. Interestingly, a Gα null mutant (Δbcg1) in B. cinerea was ET insensitive [21], and one identified GPCR (BcGPR3) demonstrated the ability to bind ET [36]. Cumulatively, these studies imply that certain GPCR/G protein systems could be involved in ET sensing in fungal pathogens.
Upon perceiving exogenous stimuli by the GPCR/G protein system, the signals could be further relayed to intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, vital regulators for the establishment of appressorial structure and function in plant pathogenic fungi [37,38,39]. The studies with C. gloeosporioides revealed that deletion of the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A retarded the formation of appressorium [39]. Meanwhile, C. gloeosporioides containing mutated mitogen-activated protein kinase (CgMK1) could not form appressorium. Exogenous addition of cAMP failed to restore the mutant’s defect, indicating that CgMK1 may function downstream or independent of cAMP-mediated signaling for appressorium formation [40]. Thus, whether the intracellular secondary signaling pathways are involved in ET responses to regulate appressorium development is worth investigating.
The present study aimed to uncover the molecular events regulated by ET to affect the development and pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides. Through transcriptome analysis, the ET-regulated genes related to appressorium formation and pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides were systematically explored. In addition, reverse genetic study determined the functions of specific ET signaling and responsive genes, leading to the speculation that ET may promote appressorium formation and pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides through the GPCRs and MAPK signaling pathways.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Pathogen and Host Plant Materials

Single-spore strain EX2016-02 of C. gloeosporioides has been isolated and characterized in a previous study [41], and this strain was used as a recipient for genetic modification. All the fungal strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. To generate fungal conidial suspension, approximately two-week-old, sporulating cultures on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates were flooded with sterile water. The resultant conidial suspension was measured for concentration and adjusted to 3 × 105 conidia mL−1 using a hemocytometer. Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) was grown in vermiculite soil at 23 °C under short-day conditions (8 h light/16 h dark) for 4 weeks to obtain detached leaves for the inoculation assay.

2.2. Ethylene Treatment and Sample Preparation

Gaseous ethylene (ET) was purchased from Pujiang Special Gas Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. To examine the effects of ET, the samples were placed in humidified plastic boxes with tight sealing caps. Pure ET was injected into the boxes to achieve specified concentrations, which were confirmed via gas chromatographic analysis according to the reported method [43]. Meanwhile, the samples placed in the boxes without ET input were used as controls.
To harvest fungal samples for transcriptome study, conidia suspension was poured into 90 mm diameter glass Petri dishes, with 20 mL per dish. The Petri dishes were placed in sealed plastic boxes. Control and ET (200 ppm) treatment were performed as shown above. After incubation for 4 or 24 h, the supernatant liquid was gently poured out, and the remaining conidia and germlings were scratched from the bottom of the dishes by using a cell scraper. Three independent samples were collected for each treatment, and the experiment was repeated three times. The resulted samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, followed by thorough lyophilization before RNA extraction.

2.3. Total RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted using QIAGEN Reagent (Hilden, Germany) and then treated with DNase I according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of extracted total RNA was verified using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The total amount of RNA required for a single sample of transcriptome test was not less than 5 μg, and the optical density value of 260 over 280 was between 1.8 and 2.2.

2.4. Library Preparation and RNA Sequencing

The RNA library was constructed using the Illumina TruseqTM RNA sample prep kit method (Origingene biotechnology company, Shanghai, China). Briefly, three independent samples were collected for each treatment. Total RNA was extracted and enriched by oligo-dT selection. The mRNA samples were fragmented and reverse-transcribed to double-strand cDNA using the random primers and reverse transcriptase. The sticky ends of synthesized cDNA were repaired to blunt ends using the End Repair Mix, and then to the 3’ end, an A base was added to connect to the Y-shaped adaptor. Paired-end reads of 150 bases were obtained using Illumina HiSeq 2000 and converted into sequence data through Base Calling.

2.5. Transcriptomic Data Analysis

The clean reads were filtered using cutadapt (v1.16) from the low-quality reads, which were stored in FASTQ format [44]. Genome assemblies of C. gloeosporioides Cg-14 (NCBI accession number SUB133583) were used as a reference sequence, and the reads were aligned to the reference sequence with hisat2 software (v2.1.0) [45]. Fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) for differential expression using StringTie software (v1.3.3b) were calculated [46]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (fold change ≥ 2, adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05) were identified with the DEseq2 algorithm [47]. Heat map visualization was performed using ggplot2 and pheatmap packages, and the overall number of differential genes were counted using the UpSetR package [48,49]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was calculated from the expression data using ggpubr, ggthemes, and gmodels packages. Blast2GO software was used for functional annotation of the transcripts [50]. GO analysis and visualization were performed using the R language GOcircle package.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

For qRT-PCR analysis, 1 μg of each RNA sample was used for reverse transcription with the Prime Script™ RT reagent kit (Perfect Real Time) (TakaRa Biotechnology, Co., Dalian, China). The real-time PCR amplifications were conducted in a CFX96TM Real-Time System (BIO-BAD, Inc., California, USA) using TakaRa SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TakaRa Biotechnology, Co., Dalian, China). For each sample, the expression of the Actin gene was used as an internal reference. The primers for the qRT-PCR assays are listed in Table S1. There were three replicates for each sample, and the experiment was repeated three times. Relative expression levels of the tested genes were calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method [51].

2.7. Fungal Transformation

Molecular manipulation and PEG-mediated protoplast transformation as described in a previous study were used for the purposes of deleting target genes in C. gloeosporioides [42]. For the purposes of expressing exogenous genes, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) was used. The recombinant plasmids based on the backbone pAg1-H3 vector were constructed and transformed into A. tumefaciens strain Agl1 for ATMT according to the reported method [52].

2.8. Fluorescence-Based Reporter Assay

The fluorescence-based reporter assay was conducted to compare the degree of ET responses in C. gloeosporioides. Briefly, the promoters of relevant ET-responsive genes were fused with GFP and assembled into the pAg1-H3 vector at the SacI digestion site via a one-step cloning kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). The resulted recombinant plasmids were transformed into the fungus by the ATMT method. The conidial suspension (3 × 105 conidia mL−1) of the transformants was dropped on sterilized glass slides and incubated in humidified plastic boxes for 24 h. Control and ET treatments were conducted as described above. Observation of the fluorescent expression of transformants with a fluorescence microscope (Axio Imager 2, ZEISS, Jena, Germany). For each treatment, three replicates of 200 conidia were randomly selected for observation recording.

2.9. Appressorial Formation and Pathogenicity Assay

To examine the effects of ET on conidial germination and subsequent hyphal development, a conidial suspension (3 × 105 conidia mL−1) was dropped on sterilized glass slides and incubated in humidified plastic boxes. Control and ET treatments were conducted as described above. After incubation for 4 or 24 h, conidial germination and appressorium formation rates were recorded. For each treatment, three replicates of 300 conidia were randomly selected for statistical analysis.
In the pathogenicity assay, A. thaliana leaves were detached and inoculated with 6 µL conidia suspension. The inoculated materials were kept in humidified boxes containing either 0 or 200 ppm ET at the beginning of the assay. The boxes were placed under light and incubated at 25 °C. After 24 h, the samples were subjected to DAB staining analysis.

2.10. Staining Analysis for Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Leaves

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation upon pathogen infection in plant leaves were visualized by DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) staining. Briefly, 220 mg DAB was added to 200 mL sterile water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 3.7 to completely dissolve the contents. The solution was mixed with 110 mL Tween 20 (0.05% v/v) and 0.8 g Na2HPO4 to obtain the DAB dye solution. The samples for analysis were stained in the freshly prepared solution by shaking at 100 rpm in the dark for 4 h. After staining, the samples were boiled in 95% ethanol to decolorize. Photographs of the samples were analyzed with ImageJ software to calculate the depth of staining according to the reported method [53].

2.11. FDA-PI Dual Fluorescence Staining

FDA (fluorescein diacetate) was dissolved in acetone to obtain a final concentration of 30 mg mL−1, and PI (propidium iodide) was dissolved in DPBS buffer (Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline) to obtain a final concentration of 10 mg mL−1. Five microliters of the above solutions were diluted to 1 mL with sterile water to obtain a fresh staining solution. The conidial suspension was placed on the glass slide to germinate for 4 h or 24 h, and the staining solution was added to the samples. After staining at room temperature for 30 min, the dyes were drained, and the samples were washed 3 times with sterile water. Images were acquired with the fluorescence microscopic analysis as follows: live cells were stained with FDA to show a bright green fluorescent signal (530 nm) upon excitation light (488 nm), while in contrast, dead cells were stained with PI to emit a red fluorescent signal (617 nm) under green excitation light (535 nm).

2.12. Calcofluor White-EosinY Double Fluorescence Staining

The double staining assay was conducted according to the previous method [54], in which chitin and its deacetylated form chitosan were stained by Calcofluor white (18909-100ML-F, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and EosinY (A600190-0025, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), respectively. The conidial suspension was placed on the glass slide for germination. After staining in the dark at room temperature for 10 min, the staining solution was removed, and the samples were analyzed with a fluorescent microscope. Fluorescent signals of calcofluor white and Eosin Y were captured using 405 and 561 nm excitation wavelengths, respectively.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out with the GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. Bar charts represent mean values with standard deviations; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*).

3. Results

3.1. Ethylene Accelerated Conidial Germination, Appressorium Formation, and Pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides

The conidia of C. gloeosporioides treated with ET demonstrated an appressorium formation rate of 71.96% on glass slides at 4 h post-inoculation (hpi), in contrast to that of the control (CK) value of 10.64%. At 24 hpi, the gap between the CK (86.08%) and ET treatment (91.39%) groups in appressorium formation rates was not comparable as it had been at 4 hpi; however, the appressorium yield per single conidium was higher in the ET group than that of CK group at 24 hpi (Figure 1A,B). FDA and PI double staining showed that germinated spores in the CK- and ET-treated groups survived at 4 hpi, as these cells were filled with FDA staining signal (bright green). However, at 24 hpi, the proportion of PI-stained cell areas was higher in the ET-treated samples, in other words, the prolonged ET treatment resulted in stimulating appressorium development, which was accompanied by apoptotic processes (Figure S1). Fluorescent microscopic analysis with the Cg-gfp strain demonstrated that ET could also promote the appressorium formation on the Arabidopsis leaf surface. Additionally, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) at the inoculation site as visualized by DAB staining showed that there were stronger ROS in the ET group than in the CK (Figure 1C). These results indicate that ET can significantly promote the appressorium differentiation and host infection of C. gloeosporioides.

3.2. ET Treatment Altered Transcript Levels of a Large Set of Genes in Germinating Conidia of C. gloeosporioides

In order to reveal the molecular events related to the effects of ET on C. gloeosporioides, RNA-seq assays were conducted with the germinating conidia at 4 and 24 hpi. Compared with the CK group, ET treatment resulted in 833 upregulated and 997 downregulated genes at 4 hpi. However, ET treatment only upregulated 78 genes but downregulated 2649 genes at 24 hpi (Figure 2A). The up- and downregulated genes by ET treatment at both 4 hpi and 24 hpi were 9 and 518, respectively (Figure 2B). PCA revealed that there were significant differences in gene expression between the CK-4hpi VS CK-24hpi, ET-4hpi VS CK-4hpi, and ET-24hpi VS CK-24hpi groups. However, the ET-4hpi and CK-24hpi groups were overlapped in PCA (Table S2, Figure 2C). The gene expression values obtained from RNA-seq were validated using the qRT-PCR assay. The expression levels of 27 randomly selected C. gloeosporioides genes demonstrated a strong correlation (R2 = 0.9089) between the results obtained with the two techniques (Figure 2D, Figures S2 and S3, Table S3).

3.3. Functional Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as influenced by ET treatment were subjected to the GO (gene ontology) classification analysis. The results showed that anchored component of membrane (GO:0031225), extracellular region (GO:0005576), cell surface (GO:0009986), intrinsic component of plasma membrane (GO:0031226), fungal-type cell wall (GO:0009277), and other cellular-component-related genes were significantly upregulated by ET at 4 hpi. Meanwhile, the expression of a large number of genes related to biological processes such as response to stress (GO:0006950), response to abiotic stimulus (GO:0009628), response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979), and DNA synthesis involved in DNA repair (GO:0000731) were downregulated. At 24 hpi, the DEGs downregulated by ET were enriched in the reproduction (GO:0000003), cytokinesis (GO:0000910), transcription (GO:0006355), cellular protein modification process (GO:0006464), and phosphate-containing compound metabolic process (GO:0006796) (Figure 3, Table S4).
As the “extracellular region” GO enrichment included the largest number of upregulated DEGs at 4 hpi, it was further found that these DEGs mainly encode two types of products: extracellular hydrolases and extracellular structural components. As shown in Figure S4, ET treatment can significantly promote the expression of the genes encoding for polysaccharide deacetylase, cutinase, multicopper oxidase, and cerato-platanin protein. At the same time, ET could also promote transcript levels of the genes encoding for cell wall proteins, appressoria structure proteins, glycolipid-anchored surface protein, and other structural proteins.

3.4. Hydrophobic Surface Binding Protein A and Cutinase-Related Genes Were Induced by ET Treatment at the Early Germinating Stage

Twelve most strongly induced DEGs by ET at 4 hpi are described in Table 2. Via Protein Blast analysis to characterize the conserved domains encoded by these DEGs, three genes (CGLO_03844, CGLO_00547, CGLO_13252) encoding for hydrophobic surface binding protein A domains (HsbA) were identified. Via the GFP-based reporter analysis, it was shown that ET treatment promoted the GFP-expressing signal when this reporter gene was driven by the promoters of HsbA genes (CGLO_03844 and CGLO_13252), suggesting that these HsbA genes are indeed highly sensitive to ET stimulus (Figure 4A,C, Table S5). In Aspergillus oryzae, HsbA is adsorbed to the hydrophobic surface to recruit cutinase CutL1, which can degrade the hydrophobic cutin on the plant surface [55]. Interestingly, the genes encoding for cutinase transcription factor genes (CTF1α CGLO_17337, CTF1β CGLO_00958) and cutinase genes (CGLO_17126, CGLO_16577) of C. gloeosporioides were also significantly upregulated upon ET treatment (Figure 4B, Table S5).

3.5. ET Promoted the Melanin Synthesis and Chitin Deacetylation at the Appressorial Cell Wall

Appressoria of C. gloeosporioides are induced by ET with a characteristic accumulation of a dark pigment, the fungal DHN (1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene) melanin. The biosynthesis process of DHN melanin involves a series of key enzymes including polyketide synthase (PKS), 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (T4HN) reductase (T4HR), 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene (T3HN) reductase (THR), scytalone dehydratase (SCD), and laccases [54,56]. Additionally, the fungal transcription factors, CMR1 and its orthologs, are known to regulate the expression of the DHN melanin biosynthesis genes in fungi [57]. We found that the genes encoding for melanin synthases of C. gloeosporioides, including CgPKS1 (CGLO_05047), CgT4HR1 (CGLO_10812), CgTHR1 (CGLO_00442), and CgSCD1 (CGLO_09685), as well as the transcription factor CgCMR1 (CGLO_10813), were significantly upregulated upon ET treatment. Moreover, ET also stimulated the transcript levels of a group of laccase genes (CGLO_06458, CGLO_02601, CGLO_06095, CGLO_12977, CGLO_02394, and CGLO_04100), which could be responsible for polymerizing 1,8-DHN monomers into the final melanin products (Figure 5A, Table S5).
Filamentous fungal cell walls are generally composed of chitin polysaccharides. However, this cell wall component can be modified by the fungi themselves for certain purposes, such as evading the host immune recognition and thus enhancing the pathogenicity of the fungi. Chitin deacetylases (CDA) are enzymes that catalyze the transformation of chitin into chitosan. The genome of C. gloeosporioides contains seven putative CDA-encoding genes, among which five CDA genes (CGLO_07057, CGLO_16772, CGLO_00212, CGLO_16754, and CGLO_02140) were upregulated by ET. Double-staining assay with Calcofluor and Eosin Y revealed that as appressorium formation proceeded, chitin was deacetylated to form chitosan at the appressorial zones (Figure 5B, Table S5). These results indicate that the appressorial cell wall of C. gloeosporioides is characterized by accumulating melanin and chitosan, which can be highly promoted by the presence of ET.

3.6. Pathogenicity Enhancement of C. gloeosporioides in Response to ET Was Partially Dependent on the Upregulation of Melanin Synthase and Effector Genes

Hitherto, the study confirms that ET can promote appressorium formation and infection of C. gloeosporioides. Accompanying ET-induced genes were further screened for their contribution to the ET-regulated pathogenicity. Three selected ET-responsive genes were targeted for knockout: CgCAP22 (CGLO_01483), predicted to encode the homolog of appressorium-specific protein CAP22 [58]; CgCP1 (CGLO_12973), encoding the virulent effector cerato-platanin [59]; and CgSCD1 (CGLO_09685), encoding the melanin biosynthesis enzyme [42]. The resultant mutant strains of ΔCgcap22, ΔCgscd1, and ΔCgcp1 showed no significant difference in the growth rate compared to the WT (Figure 6A).
Furthermore, in vitro assays demonstrated that ET induced appressorium development in all the tested mutants by comparable level in the WT, suggesting that the mutants retain sensitivity to ET (Figure 6B). In contrast, in the infection assay on Arabidopsis leaves, ET treatment enhanced ROS accumulation at the inoculation sites of the WT and ΔCgcap22 mutant spores, while the ΔCgscd1 and ΔCgcp1 inoculation sites resulted in negligible ROS accumulation, irrespective of ET treatment or not (Figure 6C). Consequently, upregulating the melanin synthesis and the effector genes is likely of vital importance for ET to promote the pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides.

3.7. ET Promoting Appressorium Formation and Virulence Was Dependent on MAPK and GPCR Pathways

The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways are known to be involved in sensing environmental signals and regulating spore germination in fungi. In this study, the following genes CgMK1 (CGLO_17118) encoding for MAPK, CgSte11 (CGLO_15819) encoding for MAPKKK, and CgGPCR3-1 (CGLO_14522) and CgGPCR3-2 (CGLO_16780) encoding for two GPCRs, were cloned and identified from the genome of C. gloeosporioides. Knock-out mutation via protoplast transformation and homologous recombination resulted in the corresponding mutants of ΔCgmk1, ΔCgste11, ΔCggpcr3-1, ΔCggpcr3-2, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 double mutants. The growth rate of ΔCgmk1 and ΔCgste11 were significantly impaired in comparison with the WT strain. However, the ΔCggpcr3-1, ΔCggpcr3-2, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 mutants demonstrated comparable growth rates as the WT (Figure 7A,C).
Concerning the ET-responsive phenotypic characters, the ΔCgmk1 and ΔCgste11 mutants showed defects in appressorium formation, but spore germination was slightly promoted by ET (Figure 7D). Moreover, the ΔCggpcr3-1, ΔCggpcr3-2, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 showed elevated spore germination rates in response to ET; however, induction of appressorium formation by ET was attenuated in these GPCR mutants, among which the double mutant ΔCggpcr3-1/2 was the most extremely depressed (Figure 7B,D,E).
DAB staining further demonstrated that upon ET treatment, the inoculation sites with WT and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 showed stronger ROS accumulation than their corresponding control samples. In contrast, the ΔCgste11 inoculation sites resulted in negligible ROS accumulation in both control and ET treatment conditions (Figure 7F). Collectively, these results imply that the MAPK- and GPCR-mediated signaling pathways are likely involved in the ET-accelerated appressorium development; however, it is the MAPK pathway component that is required for mediating ET to promote the pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides in the plant.
Moreover, gene expression analysis indicated that several ET-induced genes, including CGLO_09685 (CgSCD1), CGLO_12793 (CgCP1), CGLO_16754 (encoding for chitin deacetylase), CGLO_03844 and CGLO_13252 (encoding for hydrophobic surface binding protein A), and CGLO_15181 (hypothetical protein), were extensively impaired in ET responsiveness in the ΔCgmk1 and ΔCgste11 mutants. As for the ΔCggpcr3-1/2 double mutant, expression levels of the above genes except for CGLO_12793 (CgCP1) were also not sensitive to ET stimulus (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Ethylene (ET) is the ripening hormone for fruit crops to achieve full maturation and attractive qualities. Microbial contamination and rotting are favored by fruit ripening, and usually lead to the release of more ET, thereby stimulating the ripening and rotting of nearby fruits. In this context, the influence of ET on both fruits and their rotting agent fungi should be precisely understood to achieve better management of postharvest losses. The ET signaling mechanisms in plants have been extensively elucidated since the 1990s, mostly due to a series of milestone findings based on elegant genetic analysis with the model plant Arabidopsis [60,61], while the ET action mode and mechanisms on plant pathogens are still largely unknown. The current study used transcriptomic and reverse genetic analysis to reveal the molecular response mechanisms to ET in the anthracnose fungus C. gloeosporioides.
C. gloeosporioides is a typical hemibiotrophic fungus that infects plants by forming appressoria. Spore germination and subsequent appressorium development of this fungus can be accelerated by ET [17]. Using the transgenic strain of Cg-gfp expressing GFP, this study confirms that ET can significantly promote the formation of appressoria in vitro and on Arabidopsis leaves. Fungal ET responses such as accelerated spore germination appear similar to the postulated ancestral phenomenon of ET motivating cell elongation in plants [62,63]. Moreover, appressoria are known as specialized cells or adhesion structures from which a penetration peg emerges to pierce the host tissue [64]. We found that ET enhanced appressoria development and ROS accumulation at the inoculation site on leaves, suggesting that ET could influence the outcome of the pathogen–host interaction by affecting the fungal side. These ET-sensing responses in fungi, exemplified by C. gloeosporioides, are thought to provide the pathogen an adaptive advantage by allowing them to accurately time their infections to the host’s ripening stages [17].
In order to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the ET responsive phenotypes of C. gloeosporioides, the transcriptome data of the germinating spores were analyzed. ET was found to cause a large number of upregulated genes at 4 hpi, with the genes coding for “extracellular region”-related genes, such as the hydrophobic-surface-binding protein A (HsbA) and cutinase-related proteins, cell wall structural proteins, melanin synthesis enzymes, chitin deacetylases, and virulence proteins being extremely enriched. These DEGs are closely related to the phenotypic responses to ET in this phytopathogenic fungus.
In filamentous fungi, cell walls are commonly darkened by accumulating DHN-melanins. These pigments are secondary metabolites produced via the polyketide synthase pathway [56]. In this study, microscopic observation of the melanized appressoria is in accordance with the gene expression data, indicating that the melanin biosynthesis activity is accelerated by ET during the spore germinating and appressorium developing stages of C. gloeosporioides. The roles of appressorial melanization in fungal pathogenicity has been well documented [65,66]. Melanin may contribute to the cross-linking of cell wall components in order to reinforce the rigidity of appressoria, allowing them to withstand hyper-osmosis and generate mechanical infection force [67]. Meanwhile, hyperaccumulation of melanin pigments at the appressorial surface may also contribute to fungal survival during the oxidative burst of host plants [68,69]. This study found that ET can promote the melanin-defective mutant ΔCgscd1 to germinate and develop appressoria as it does in the wild-type strain; however, ET had little effect on the pathogenicity of the ΔCgscd1 mutant. These findings suggest that melanin could be an indispensable cellular constituent being responsive to ET stimulus to determine the pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides.
Another representative gene induced by ET is CgCP1 coding for the cerato-platanin effector, reminiscent of the scenario wherein the homologous gene Bcspl1 in B. cinerea was also sensitive to ET [21]. BcSpl1 is one of the most abundant proteins in the secretory group of B. cinerea, and the loss of this gene led to a decrease in the pathogenicity of the fungus [70]. Moreover, the cerato-platanin homologs have also been found to be required for the pathogenicity of M. grisea [71] and C. gloeosporioides [59]. This study shows that the ΔCgcp1 mutant is still ET-sensitive in vitro; however, exogenous ET could not promote the pathogenicity of ΔCgcp1, suggesting that cerato-platanin is a vital virulence factor being stimulated by ET to accelerate host infection.
Secreted enzymes were included in the DEGs. Genes coding for chitin deacetylases (CDAs) were upregulated by ET at 4 hpi, which was phenotypically verified by differential staining of chitin and chitosan, indicating the presence of chitosan in appressoria but not in vegetative hyphae. Chitin undergoing deacetylation into chitosan in the cell wall has been associated with hyphal growth and differentiation, such as polar growth in Aspergillus fumigatus [72], appressorium development in Magnaporthe oryzae [73] and Uromyces fabae [74], and formation of the infection structure in Botrytis cinerea [54]. The transformation of chitin into chitosan in C. gloeosporioides thus might also be responsive to ET to accelerate appressorium development and pathogenicity. The production of chitosan plays a role in cell wall integrity and anchoring of melanins [75,76,77]. Moreover, chitin deacetylation is thought to prevent the detection of chitin as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) by the host immune system [78]. In the powdery mildew fungus, RNAi silencing or chemical inhibition of CDA resulted in a dramatic reduction in fungal growth, which was linked to a rapid elicitation of chitin-triggered immunity; thus, CDA represents a promising target for the control of phytopathogenic fungi [79]. However, due to the redundancy of CDA genes, the exact roles of chitin deacetylation in C. gloeosporioides remain open to be characterized.
Moreover, fungal extracellular cutinases can help the pathogen penetrate through the outermost cuticular barriers of host plants. Cutin monomers, produced by low levels of constitutively expressed cutinase, are prone to inducing high levels of cutinase, which can aid pathogenic fungi in penetrating the host through the cuticle, with cutin as the major structural polymer [80]. Cutinase transcription factor 1α (CTF1α) and CTF1β are involved in strongly inducing and constitutively maintaining cutinase expression, respectively [80,81]. Similarly, the HsbA is known to recruit cutinases to the hydrophobic surface [55]. The transcriptomic analysis in this study revealed that ET can stimulate the expression levels of both CTF1α, CTF1β, and HsbAs and their related cutinases during the early germinating stage of C. gloeosporioides. These findings suggest that ET signaling is capable of triggering the invasive weapons of the fungal pathogen to pierce the host.
Programmed cell death and autophagy are also known to be involved in conidial germination and appressoria differentiation in some fungal plant pathogens [28,82]. The ET-motivated appressorium formation is a series of morphogenesis involving cell cycling processes. ET treatment leads to the development of multiple appressoria from each individual spore, accompanied by cellular apoptosis as evidenced by FAD and PI staining assay. These findings imply that ET may be recognized by the fungal pathogens as a triggering signal for ripening and susceptibility in host plants, and upon the ET stimulus, the fungal spore germlings should exert all their energies until sacrificed to establish infections.
Besides ET, many other host-plant-related materials may stimulate spore germination and appressoria differentiation of pathogenic fungi, such as adhesives, cutin monomers, surface hydrophobicity, surface hardness, and topographic signals [83,84]. Several signal pathways participate in regulating the appressorium formation, such as Gα and Gβ proteins [33], the adenylyl cyclase and PKA-mediated cAMP pathway [85], calmodulin signaling [86], and the MAPK signaling pathway [37]. It is proposed that the G-protein-coupled receptor BcGPCR3 of B. cinerea possesses the ability to bind ET and regulate responses to ET [36], while the MAPK cascade and their protein phosphorylation are involved in regulating the ET responses of C. gloeosporioides [87]. This study reveals that the MAPK pathway components (Cgmk1 and Cgste11) play core roles in mediating morphological and molecular responses to ET. However, the identified GPCR3 homologs (Cggpcr3-1/2) are responsible for partial ET responsiveness, suggesting that there are still remaining undiscovered components that could participate in ET sensing in this fungus.
Collectively, this paper reports that ET could alter transcript levels of the genes that are closely relevant to accelerating spore germination, appressoria formation, and virulence expression of C. gloeosporioides. Moreover, ET promoting the gene expression, morphogenesis, and pathogenicity of C. gloeosporioides seems to be dependent on the GPCRs and the MAPK pathway, although the upstream perception mechanisms for ET signal in the fungus still remain obscure. These findings correspond well with the hypothesis that phytopathogenic fungi could response to ET via the pathway being different from in plant [88]. Thus, it is possible to selectively block the ET perception in fungal pathogens for the purpose for disease management during fruit ripening, although achieving this goal should be based full understanding the exact ET sensing and signaling mechanisms in fungi in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8060570/s1, Figure S1: Statistics of red fluorescence area in FDA-PI dual fluorescence staining. Figure S2: qRT-PCR verification of upregulated differential genes. Figure S3: qRT-PCR verification of upregulated differential genes. Figure S4: Annotation information of genes enriched in extracellular region (GO: 0005576). Table S1: Oligonucleotide primers used for target amplification in this study. Table S2: Principal component analysis. Table S3: Correlation analysis of QPCR and RNAseq. Table S4: GO terms of fungal transcripts that are significantly differentially expressed by ethylene treatment. Table S5: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides gene expression profile during ethylene treatment 4 hpi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R., P.Z. and L.X.; methodology, D.R., T.W., P.Z. and L.X.; software, D.R., T.W. and X.D.; validation, D.R., T.W., G.Z., W.R., X.D., L.G. and J.C.; formal analysis, D.R., T.W., G.Z. and W.R.; investigation, D.R., T.W., G.Z. and W.R.; resources, D.R., T.W., P.Z. and L.X.; data curation, D.R. and T.W.; writing—original draft preparation, D.R., P.Z. and L.X.; writing—review and editing, D.R., P.Z. and L.X.; visualization, D.R., T.W., G.Z. and W.R.; supervision, P.Z. and L.X.; project administration, P.Z. and L.X.; funding acquisition, P.Z. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the grants from the Shanghai Municipal Agricultural and Rural Committee (No. 2019-02-08-00-02-F01146), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32061133006, No. 31972121), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 21ZR1421600).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lin, Z.; Zhong, S.; Grierson, D. Recent advances in ethylene research. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3311–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, M.; Pirrello, J.; Chervin, C.; Roustan, J.P.; Bouzayen, M. Ethylene Control of Fruit Ripening: Revisiting the Complex Network of Transcriptional Regulation. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2380–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Francini, A.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene Role in Plant Growth, Development and Senescence: Interaction with Other Phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Shakeel, S.N.; Wang, X.; Binder, B.M.; Schaller, G.E. Mechanisms of signal transduction by ethylene: Overlapping and non-overlapping signalling roles in a receptor family. AoB Plants 2013, 5, plt010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hua, J.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Ethylene Responses Are Negatively Regulated by a Receptor Gene Family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 1998, 94, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Phukan, U.J.; Jeena, G.S.; Tripathi, V.; Shukla, R.K. Regulation of Apetala2/Ethylene Response Factors in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, M. Role of ethylene response factors (ERFs) in fruit ripening. Food Qual. Saf. 2020, 4, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, Y.; Tang, M.; Liu, M.; Su, D.; Chen, J.; Gao, Y.; Bouzayen, M.; Li, Z. The Molecular Regulation of Ethylene in Fruit Ripening. Small Methods 2020, 4, 1900485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tintor, N.; Ross, A.; Kanehara, K.; Yamada, K.; Fan, L.; Kemmerling, B.; Nürnberger, T.; Tsuda, K.; Saijo, Y. Layered pattern receptor signaling via ethylene and endogenous elicitor peptides during Arabidopsis immunity to bacterial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6211–6216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Barth, M.; Hankinson, T.R.; Zhuang, H.; Breidt, F. Microbiological Spoilage of Fruits and Vegetables. In Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages; Sperber, W.H., Doyle, M.P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 135–183. [Google Scholar]
  11. Darras, A.I. Postharvest Disease Management. In Handbook of Florists’ Crops Diseases; McGovern, R.J., Elmer, W.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 253–279. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong, X. SA, JA, ethylene, and disease resistance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Berens, M.L.; Berry, H.M.; Mine, A.; Argueso, C.T.; Tsuda, K. Evolution of Hormone Signaling Networks in Plant Defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Loon, L.C.; Geraats, B.P.J.; Linthorst, H.J.M. Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, N.; Han, X.; Feng, D.; Yuan, D.; Huang, L.J. Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lorenzo, O.; Piqueras, R.; Sánchez-Serrano, J.J.; Solano, R. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Flaishman, M.A.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Timing of fungal invasion using host’s ripening hormone as a signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 6579–6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. El-Kazzaz, M.K.; Sommer, N.F.; Kader, A.A. Ethylene effects on in vitro and in vivo growth of certain postharvest fruit-infecting fungi. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 998–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kępczyńska, E. Ethylene requirement during germination of Botiytis cinerea spores. Physiol. Plant. 1989, 77, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kępczyńska, E. Involvement of ethylene in spore germination and mycelial growth of Alternaria alternata. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chagué, V.; Danit, L.V.; Siewers, V.; Schulze-Gronover, C.; Tudzynski, P.; Tudzynski, B.; Sharon, A. Ethylene sensing and gene activation in Botrytis cinerea: A missing link in ethylene regulation of fungus-plant interactions? Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Huang, J.Q.; Jiang, H.F.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Lei, Y.; Wang, S.Y.; Liao, B.S. Ethylene inhibited aflatoxin biosynthesis is due to oxidative stress alleviation and related to glutathione redox state changes in Aspergillus flavus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 130, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hyde, K.D.; Cai, L.; Cannon, P.F.; Crouch, J.A.; Crous, P.W.; Damm, U.; Goodwin, P.H.; Chen, H.; Johnston, P.R.; Jones, E.B.G.; et al. Colletotrichum–Names in current use. Fungal Divers. 2009, 39, 147–182. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cannon, P.F.; Bridge, P.D.; Monte, E. Linking the past, present, and future of Colletotrichum systematics. In Colletotrichum: Host Specificity, Pathology, and Host Pathogen Interaction; Prusky, D.F.S., Dickman, M.B., Eds.; American Phytopathological Society (APS Press): St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sutton, B.C. The genus Glomerella and its anamorph Colletotrichum. In Colletotrichum: Biology, pathology andcontrol; Bailey, J.A., Jeger, M.J., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1992; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  26. De Silva, D.D.; Crous, P.W.; Ades, P.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Taylor, P.W.J. Life styles of Colletotrichum species and implications for plant biosecurity. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Weir, B.S.; Johnston, P.R.; Damm, U. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 115–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Veneault-Fourrey, C.; Barooah, M.; Egan, M.; Wakley, G.; Talbot Nicholas, J. Autophagic Fungal Cell Death Is Necessary for Infection by the Rice Blast Fungus. Science 2006, 312, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Yin, Z.; Chen, C.; Yang, J.; Feng, W.; Liu, X.; Zuo, R.; Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Zhong, K.; Gao, C.; et al. Histone acetyltransferase MoHat1 acetylates autophagy-related proteins MoAtg3 and MoAtg9 to orchestrate functional appressorium formation and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2019, 15, 1234–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, L.; Wright, S.J.; Krystofova, S.; Park, G.; Borkovich, K.A. Heterotrimeric G Protein Signaling in Filamentous Fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 423–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brown, N.A.; Schrevens, S.; van Dijck, P.; Goldman, G.H. Fungal G-protein-coupled receptors: Mediators of pathogenesis and targets for disease control. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.; Dean, R.A. G protein alpha subunit genes control growth, development, and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI 1997, 10, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Nishimura, M.; Park, G.; Xu, J.R. The G-beta subunit MGB1 is involved in regulating multiple steps of infection-related morphogenesis in Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, P.; Li, D. A Gγ subunit promoter T-DNA insertion mutant—A1-412 of Magnaporthe grisea is defective in appressorium formation, penetration and pathogenicity. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2006, 51, 2214–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. DeZwaan, T.M.; Carroll, A.M.; Valent, B.; Sweigard, J.A. Magnaporthe grisea pth11p is a novel plasma membrane protein that mediates appressorium differentiation in response to inductive substrate cues. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 2013–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Lin, Y.; Ruan, H.; Akutse, K.S.; Lai, B.; Lin, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zhong, F. Ethylene and Benzaldehyde Emitted from Postharvest Tomatoes Inhibit Botrytis cinerea via Binding to G-Protein Coupled Receptors and Transmitting with cAMP-Signal Pathway of the Fungus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 13706–13717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, X.; Lu, D.; Tian, C. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade CgSte50-Ste11-Ste7-Mk1 regulates infection-related morphogenesis in the poplar anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 248, 126748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Osés-Ruiz, M.; Cruz-Mireles, N.; Martin-Urdiroz, M.; Soanes, D.M.; Eseola, A.B.; Tang, B.; Derbyshire, P.; Nielsen, M.; Cheema, J.; Were, V.; et al. Appressorium-mediated plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae is regulated by a Pmk1-dependent hierarchical transcriptional network. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 1383–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Priyatno, T.P.; Abu Bakar, F.D.; Kamaruddin, N.; Mahadi, N.M.; Abdul Murad, A.M. Inactivation of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A causes delayed appressorium formation and reduced pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 545784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. He, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Tian, C. The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase CgMK1 Governs Appressorium Formation, Melanin Synthesis, and Plant Infection of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, T.; Xiang, S.; Ren, D.D.; Zhu, P.K.; Xu, L. First Report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Causing Postharvest Fruit Rot on Citrus aurantifolia in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, T.; Ren, D.; Guo, H.; Chen, X.; Zhu, P.; Nie, H.; Xu, L. CgSCD1 Is Essential for Melanin Biosynthesis and Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Pathogens 2020, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhu, P.; Xu, L.; Zhang, C.; Toyoda, H.; Gan, S.-S. Ethylene produced by Botrytis cinerea can affect early fungal development and can be used as a marker for infection during storage of grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 66, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Embnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pertea, M.; Kim, D.; Pertea, G.M.; Leek, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 1650–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Conway, J.R.; Lex, A.; Gehlenborg, N. UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2938–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Galili, T.; O’Callaghan, A.; Sidi, J.; Sievert, C. heatmaply: An R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 1600–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Conesa, A.; Götz, S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2008, 2008, 619832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, A.; Lu, P.; Dahl-Roshak, A.M.; Paress, P.S.; Kennedy, S.; Tkacz, J.S.; An, Z. Efficient disruption of a polyketide synthase gene (pks1) required for melanin synthesis through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Glarea lozoyensis. Mol. Genet Genom. 2003, 268, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fister, A.S.; O’Neil, S.T.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tyler, B.M.; Guiltinan, M.J.; Maximova, S.N. Two Theobroma cacao genotypes with contrasting pathogen tolerance show aberrant transcriptional and ROS responses after salicylic acid treatment. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6245–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Choquer, M.; Rascle, C.; Gonçalves, I.R.; de Vallée, A.; Ribot, C.; Loisel, E.; Smilevski, P.; Ferria, J.; Savadogo, M.; Souibgui, E.; et al. The infection cushion of Botrytis cinerea: A fungal ‘weapon’ of plant-biomass destruction. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 2293–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ohtaki, S.; Maeda, H.; Takahashi, T.; Yamagata, Y.; Hasegawa, F.; Gomi, K.; Nakajima, T.; Abe, K. Novel hydrophobic surface binding protein, HsbA, produced by Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 2407–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Tran-Ly, A.N.; Reyes, C.; Schwarze, F.; Ribera, J. Microbial production of melanin and its various applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tsuji, G.; Kenmochi, Y.; Takano, Y.; Sweigard, J.; Farrall, L.; Furusawa, I.; Horino, O.; Kubo, Y. Novel fungal transcriptional activators, Cmr1p of Colletotrichum lagenarium and pig1p of Magnaporthe grisea, contain Cys2His2 zinc finger and Zn(II)2Cys6 binuclear cluster DNA-binding motifs and regulate transcription of melanin biosynthesis genes in a developmentally specific manner. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 940–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hwang, C.S.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Isolation and characterization of genes expressed uniquely during appressorium formation by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides conidia induced by the host surface wax. Mol. Gen. Genet 1995, 247, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, W.; An, B.; Feng, L.; He, C.; Luo, H. A Colletotrichum gloeosporioides cerato-platanin protein, CgCP1, contributes to conidiation and plays roles in the interaction with rubber tree. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Binder, B.M. Ethylene signaling in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 7710–7725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ju, C.; Chang, C. Mechanistic Insights in Ethylene Perception and Signal Transduction. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Musgrave, A.; Walters, J. Ethylene-stimulated growth and auxin ansport in ranunculus sceleratus petioles. New Phytol. 1973, 72, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Métraux, J.P.; Kende, H. The role of ethylene in the growth response of submerged deep water rice. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Dagdas, Y.F.; Yoshino, K.; Dagdas, G.; Ryder, L.S.; Bielska, E.; Steinberg, G.; Talbot, N.J. Septin-mediated plant cell invasion by the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Science 2012, 336, 1590–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jacobson, E. Pathogenic Roles for Fungal Melanins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cordero, R.J.; Casadevall, A. Functions of fungal melanin beyond virulence. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ludwig, N.; Lohrer, M.; Hempel, M.; Mathea, S.; Schliebner, I.; Menzel, M.; Kiesow, A.; Schaffrath, U.; Deising, H.B.; Horbach, R. Melanin is not required for turgor generation but enhances cell-wall rigidity in appressoria of the corn pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Heinekamp, T.; Thywissen, A.; Macheleidt, J.; Keller, S.; Valiante, V.; Brakhage, A. Aspergillus fumigatus melanins: Interference with the host endocytosis pathway and impact on virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Pihet, M.; Vandeputte, P.; Tronchin, G.; Renier, G.; Saulnier, P.; Georgeault, S.; Mallet, R.; Chabasse, D.; Symoens, F.; Bouchara, J.-P. Melanin is an essential component for the integrity of the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Frías, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Brito, N. BcSpl1, a cerato-platanin family protein, contributes to Botrytis cinerea virulence and elicits the hypersensitive response in the host. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jeong, J.; Mitchell, T.; Dean, R. The Magnaporthe grisea snodprot1 homolog, MSPI, is required for virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 273, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Xie, M.; Zhao, X.; Lü, Y.; Jin, C. Chitin deacetylases Cod4 and Cod7 are involved in polar growth of Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, e00943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Kuroki, M.; Okauchi, K.; Yoshida, S.; Ohno, Y.; Murata, S.; Nakajima, Y.; Nozaka, A.; Tanaka, N.; Nakajima, M.; Taguchi, H.; et al. Chitin-deacetylase activity induces appressorium differentiation in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Deising, H.; Siegrist, J. Chitin deacetylase activity of the rust Uromyces viciae-fabae is controlled by fungal morphogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 127, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Baker, L.G.; Specht, C.A.; Donlin, M.J.; Lodge, J.K. Chitosan, the deacetylated form of chitin, is necessary for cell wall integrity in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Geoghegan, I.A.; Gurr, S.J. Chitosan Mediates Germling Adhesion in Magnaporthe oryzae and Is Required for Surface Sensing and Germling Morphogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Perez-Dulzaides, R.; Camacho, E.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Casadevall, A. Cell-wall dyes interfere with Cryptococcus neoformans melanin deposition. Microbiology 2018, 164, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gao, F.; Zhang, B.S.; Zhao, J.H.; Huang, J.F.; Jia, P.S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, J.M.; Guo, H.S. Deacetylation of chitin oligomers increases virulence in soil-borne fungal pathogens. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Martínez-Cruz, J.M.; Polonio, Á.; Zanni, R.; Romero, D.; Gálvez, J.; Fernández-Ortuño, D.; Pérez-García, A. Chitin Deacetylase, a Novel Target for the Design of Agricultural Fungicides. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, D.; Sirakova, T.; Rogers, L.; Ettinger, W.F.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Regulation of constitutively expressed and induced cutinase genes by different zinc finger transcription factors in Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi (Nectria haematococca). J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 7905–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Rocha, A.L.; Di Pietro, A.; Ruiz-Roldan, C.; Roncero, M.I. Ctf1, a transcriptional activator of cutinase and lipase genes in Fusarium oxysporum is dispensable for virulence. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Saunders, D.G.; Aves, S.J.; Talbot, N.J. Cell cycle-mediated regulation of plant infection by the rice blast fungus. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Gilbert, R.D.; Johnson, A.M.; Dean, R.A. Chemical signals responsible for appressorium formation in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1996, 48, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Van der Linde, K.; Göhre, V. How Do Smut Fungi Use Plant Signals to Spatiotemporally Orientate on and In Planta? J. Fungi 2021, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Choi, W.; Dean, R.A. The adenylate cyclase gene MAC1 of Magnaporthe grisea controls appressorium formation and other aspects of growth and development. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Liu, Z.M.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Early expression of the calmodulin gene, which precedes appressorium formation in Magnaporthe grisea, is inhibited by self-inhibitors and requires surface attachment. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 3571–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Kim, Y.K.; Kawano, T.; Li, D.; Kolattukudy, P.E. A mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase required for induction of cytokinesis and appressorium formation by host signals in the conidia of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Papon, N.; Binder, B.M. An Evolutionary Perspective on Ethylene Sensing in Microorganisms. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 08 00570 g001 550
Figure 1. The phenotypic responses of C. gloeosporioides to ET during the in vitro culture and host infection processes. (A) Microscopic analysis of control (CK) and ET-treated samples. (B) The percentage of appressorium formation on glass in the CK/ET treatment groups based on calculating three replicates of 300 conidia for each sample. (C) Light and fluorescent microscopic visualization of Cg-gfp spores germinating and infecting Arabidopsis leaves; the DAB panel indicates the inoculation sites after DAB staining.
Figure 1. The phenotypic responses of C. gloeosporioides to ET during the in vitro culture and host infection processes. (A) Microscopic analysis of control (CK) and ET-treated samples. (B) The percentage of appressorium formation on glass in the CK/ET treatment groups based on calculating three replicates of 300 conidia for each sample. (C) Light and fluorescent microscopic visualization of Cg-gfp spores germinating and infecting Arabidopsis leaves; the DAB panel indicates the inoculation sites after DAB staining.
Jof 08 00570 g001
Jof 08 00570 g002 550
Figure 2. Macroscopic analysis of the transcriptome of C. gloeosporioides regulated by ET. (A) Heatmap analysis of differential genes between the CK and ET treatment groups at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (B) UpSetR visualizations of intersections between the upregulated and downregulated differential genes of the CK/ET treatment groups at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (C) Principal component analysis of the CK-4hpi, ET-4hpi, CK-24hpi, and ET-24hpi transcriptome data. (D) Correlation of gene expression values obtained by RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analysis with 27 genes, and an R2 value of 0.9089 was obtained by comparing the results obtained with the two techniques.
Figure 2. Macroscopic analysis of the transcriptome of C. gloeosporioides regulated by ET. (A) Heatmap analysis of differential genes between the CK and ET treatment groups at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (B) UpSetR visualizations of intersections between the upregulated and downregulated differential genes of the CK/ET treatment groups at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (C) Principal component analysis of the CK-4hpi, ET-4hpi, CK-24hpi, and ET-24hpi transcriptome data. (D) Correlation of gene expression values obtained by RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analysis with 27 genes, and an R2 value of 0.9089 was obtained by comparing the results obtained with the two techniques.
Jof 08 00570 g002
Jof 08 00570 g003 550
Figure 3. Summary of Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched with the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) regulated by ET at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (A) GOCircle showing the DEGs of the top 10 upregulated GO terms at 4 hpi. (B) GOCircle displaying the DEGs in the top 10 downregulated GO terms at 4 hpi. (C), GOCircle showing the DEGs of the top 10 GO terms at 24 hpi.
Figure 3. Summary of Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched with the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) regulated by ET at 4 hpi and 24 hpi. (A) GOCircle showing the DEGs of the top 10 upregulated GO terms at 4 hpi. (B) GOCircle displaying the DEGs in the top 10 downregulated GO terms at 4 hpi. (C), GOCircle showing the DEGs of the top 10 GO terms at 24 hpi.
Jof 08 00570 g003
Jof 08 00570 g004 550
Figure 4. ET can significantly promote the expression of hydrophobic-surface-binding protein A genes and cutinase-related genes. (A) ET can significantly promote the upregulation of genes encoding for hydrophobic-surface-binding protein A (HsbA). (B) ET can significantly upregulate the expression levels of cutinase and its transcription factor (CTF1α and CTF1β) genes. (C) In contrast to the WT and Cg-gfp control strains, ET can induce the expression of GFP driven by the promoters of the two HsbA genes in the PCGLO_03844-gfp and PCGLO_13252-gfp transgenic strains at 24 hpi after incubation on glass slides.
Figure 4. ET can significantly promote the expression of hydrophobic-surface-binding protein A genes and cutinase-related genes. (A) ET can significantly promote the upregulation of genes encoding for hydrophobic-surface-binding protein A (HsbA). (B) ET can significantly upregulate the expression levels of cutinase and its transcription factor (CTF1α and CTF1β) genes. (C) In contrast to the WT and Cg-gfp control strains, ET can induce the expression of GFP driven by the promoters of the two HsbA genes in the PCGLO_03844-gfp and PCGLO_13252-gfp transgenic strains at 24 hpi after incubation on glass slides.
Jof 08 00570 g004
Jof 08 00570 g005 550
Figure 5. ET can significantly promote the expression of melanin synthesis genes, chitin deacetylase, and apoptosis-related genes. (A) Ethylene can significantly promote the upregulation of genes related to melanin synthesis. (B) Double-stained with Calcofluor targeting mainly chitin (blue) and Eosin Y targeting mainly chitosan (yellow). The bottom right table in the panel shows sample order information for the fungal gene expression heatmaps.
Figure 5. ET can significantly promote the expression of melanin synthesis genes, chitin deacetylase, and apoptosis-related genes. (A) Ethylene can significantly promote the upregulation of genes related to melanin synthesis. (B) Double-stained with Calcofluor targeting mainly chitin (blue) and Eosin Y targeting mainly chitosan (yellow). The bottom right table in the panel shows sample order information for the fungal gene expression heatmaps.
Jof 08 00570 g005
Jof 08 00570 g006 550
Figure 6. Phenotypic characterization of three mutants with disruption of the ET-responsive genes including CgCAP22, CgSCD1, and CgCP1. (A) The left two rows of photos demonstrate the front (F) and reverse (R) sides of the fungal colonies grown on PDA for 5 days; the right bar chart indicates that the colony diameters of the mutants showed no significant difference in comparison with the WT. (B) ET significantly promoted the appressorium formation of WT and the mutants in vitro at 4 h after incubation on glass slides. (C) ET treatment enhanced ROS accumulation of WT and ΔCgcap22 in host leaves, but caused no effect on ΔCgscd1 and ΔCgcp1 at 24 h after inoculation. For (B,C): p < 0.05 (*).
Figure 6. Phenotypic characterization of three mutants with disruption of the ET-responsive genes including CgCAP22, CgSCD1, and CgCP1. (A) The left two rows of photos demonstrate the front (F) and reverse (R) sides of the fungal colonies grown on PDA for 5 days; the right bar chart indicates that the colony diameters of the mutants showed no significant difference in comparison with the WT. (B) ET significantly promoted the appressorium formation of WT and the mutants in vitro at 4 h after incubation on glass slides. (C) ET treatment enhanced ROS accumulation of WT and ΔCgcap22 in host leaves, but caused no effect on ΔCgscd1 and ΔCgcp1 at 24 h after inoculation. For (B,C): p < 0.05 (*).
Jof 08 00570 g006
Jof 08 00570 g007 550
Figure 7. MAPK and GPCRs were involved in mediating ET signaling to promote appressorium development and pathogenicity. (A,C) The front (F) and reverse (R) sides of colony morphology and expansion rates of the strains grown on PDA for 5 days. (B,D,E) The effect of ET on spore germination and appressorium development at 4 h after incubation on glass slides. (F) The influence of ET on ROS accumulation of the plant leaves infected with WT, ΔCgste11, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 strains at 24 h after inoculation. For (C–F): p < 0.05 (*).
Figure 7. MAPK and GPCRs were involved in mediating ET signaling to promote appressorium development and pathogenicity. (A,C) The front (F) and reverse (R) sides of colony morphology and expansion rates of the strains grown on PDA for 5 days. (B,D,E) The effect of ET on spore germination and appressorium development at 4 h after incubation on glass slides. (F) The influence of ET on ROS accumulation of the plant leaves infected with WT, ΔCgste11, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 strains at 24 h after inoculation. For (C–F): p < 0.05 (*).
Jof 08 00570 g007
Jof 08 00570 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparative expression analysis of the ET-induced genes in the WT and ΔCgmk1, ΔCgste11, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 mutants.
Figure 8. Comparative expression analysis of the ET-induced genes in the WT and ΔCgmk1, ΔCgste11, and ΔCggpcr3-1/2 mutants.
Jof 08 00570 g008
Table
Table 1. Fungal strains used in this study.
Table 1. Fungal strains used in this study.
Strain NameGenotype DescriptionStrain Source
WTWild-type C. gloeosporioides (EX2016-02)[41]
Cg-gfpFluorescent strain of C. gloeosporioidesIn this study
ΔCgcap22Appressorium structural protein null mutantIn this study
ΔCgscd1Scytalone dehydratase null mutant[42]
ΔCgcp1Cerato-platanin protein null mutantIn this study
ΔCgmk1MAPK null mutantIn this study
ΔCgste11MEK kinase null mutantIn this study
ΔCggpcr3-1G-protein-coupled receptor 3-1 null mutantIn this study
ΔCggpcr3-2G-protein-coupled receptor 3-2 null mutantIn this study
ΔCggpcr3-1/2G-protein-coupled receptors 3-1 and 3-2 double deletion mutantIn this study
PCGLO_03844-gfpTransgenic strain expressing GFP driven by CGLO_03844 promoter In this study
PCGLO_13252-gfpTransgenic strain expressing GFP driven by CGLO_13252 promoter In this study
Table
Table 2. Twelve DEGs that were upregulated by ET by more than 30-fold at 4 hpi.
Table 2. Twelve DEGs that were upregulated by ET by more than 30-fold at 4 hpi.
Idlog2FCDescriptionLength (aa)Domain
CGLO_155895.0674DJ-1/PfpI family protein248GATase1_PfpI_2 (34–229)
CGLO_074224.8147extracellular-serine-rich protein198Cupredoxin (53–154)
CGLO_113514.7586hypothetical protein208SodA (5–193)
CGLO_032494.6034hypothetical protein354M35_deuterolysin_like (168–343)
CGLO_076114.6008hypothetical protein218LPMO_auxiliary-like (21–138)
CGLO_144314.5783hypothetical protein237nucleoside_deaminase (65–151)
CGLO_038444.4491cell wall protein223HsbA (29–150)
CGLO_027894.339catalase504catalase_fungal (44–492)
CGLO_058044.2188WSC-domain-containing protein446WSC (43–122,152–227,255–332)
CGLO_005474.1784hypothetical protein167HsbA (4–123)
CGLO_132524.1765hypothetical protein319HsbA (27–146)
CGLO_118824.018cas1-appressorium-specific protein241DUF3129 (19–193)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, D.; Wang, T.; Zhou, G.; Ren, W.; Duan, X.; Gao, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, L.; Zhu, P. Ethylene Promotes Expression of the Appressorium- and Pathogenicity-Related Genes via GPCR- and MAPK-Dependent Manners in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060570

AMA Style

Ren D, Wang T, Zhou G, Ren W, Duan X, Gao L, Chen J, Xu L, Zhu P. Ethylene Promotes Expression of the Appressorium- and Pathogenicity-Related Genes via GPCR- and MAPK-Dependent Manners in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(6):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Dandan, Tan Wang, Ganghan Zhou, Weiheng Ren, Xiaomin Duan, Lin Gao, Jiaxu Chen, Ling Xu, and Pinkuan Zhu. 2022. "Ethylene Promotes Expression of the Appressorium- and Pathogenicity-Related Genes via GPCR- and MAPK-Dependent Manners in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 6: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop