Next Article in Journal
Yersinia enterocolitica-Derived Outer Membrane Vesicles Inhibit Initial Stage of Biofilm Formation
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Venturia inaequalis Isolates with Multiple Resistance in Greece
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bacillales: From Taxonomy to Biotechnological and Industrial Perspectives

1
Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 50190 Borås, Sweden
2
Microorganisms Bank, Iranian Biological Resource Centre (IBRC), Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran
3
Institute of Process Engineering in Life Science II: Technical Biology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
4
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology & Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran
5
Microbiology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran 1316943551, Iran
6
Department of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran 1316943551, Iran
7
Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran 1439957131, Iran
8
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Taicheng Road 3#, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(12), 2355; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122355
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
For a long time, the genus Bacillus has been known and considered among the most applicable genera in several fields. Recent taxonomical developments resulted in the identification of more species in Bacillus-related genera, particularly in the order Bacillales (earlier heterotypic synonym: Caryophanales), with potential application for biotechnological and industrial purposes such as biofuels, bioactive agents, biopolymers, and enzymes. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the taxonomy, growth requirements and physiology, genomics, and metabolic pathways in the highly diverse bacterial order, Bacillales, will facilitate a more robust designing and sustainable production of strain lines relevant to a circular economy. This paper is focused principally on less-known genera and their potential in the order Bacillales for promising applications in the industry and addresses the taxonomical complexities of this order. Moreover, it emphasizes the biotechnological usage of some engineered strains of the order Bacillales. The elucidation of novel taxa, their metabolic pathways, and growth conditions would make it possible to drive industrial processes toward an upgraded functionality based on the microbial nature.

1. Introduction

Bacillales (later heterotypic synonyms of Caryophanales) is the most productive order of the phylum Firmicutes. The enormous diversity of the order, which includes numerous genera and species, resulted in scanty detailed studies of the diverse taxa. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis, phylogenomics, and other approaches, Bacillales is delineated to include ten validly published families [1]. Of these, the family Bacillaceae comprises certain strains capable of surviving under various conditions, which, from an anthropogenic perspective, are considered extreme, including high or low temperatures and pH ranges and high salt concentrations. In addition to these extremes individually, some members of Bacillaceae can survive under multiple combinations of the above extremes and, hence, are considered polyextremophiles [2]. The ability to withstand harsh conditions placed members of the order Bacillales at the center of interest for various industrial applications, and [3] up to now, additional biotechnologically relevant insights are being gained, even among the well-known species and strains.
Recent advances in novel molecular techniques, omics approaches, and modern data processing and sharing capabilities enable us to expand our knowledge toward other less-known genera, species, and strains. Despite these, most of the contemporary literature on Bacillaceae focuses on a few select strains from the genus Bacillus, pathogenic genera, and some Bacillus related-genera. These reviews are enlightening, but none of them comprehensively discuss various genera belonging to the order Bacillales that, in turn, can be considered novel candidates for biotechnological and industrial applications.
The current review provides an inclusive overview of the order Bacillales, covering updates to the taxonomy of the order, its general features, diversity, and relevant industrial applications. Bacillales, which can be isolated mainly from the soil, have been the core of various research in the last 20 years, from their molecular characterization to bioengineered studies (Figure 1a). Among their species, Bacillus anthracis, which produces anthrax, and Bacillus cereus, which can cause food poisoning, can be given as an example of the negative aspects of Bacillales (Figure 1b). On the other hand, as discussed in further sections in this review article, their positive aspects have become more attractive in the industry since Bacillales play an active role in both biodegradation of petroleum-derived compounds, textile dyes, and aromatic hydrocarbons and the production of bioproducts such as organic acids, chemicals, surfactants, enzymes, and insecticides. (Figure 1c).
This review does not discuss, in detail, the pathogenic strains of the order Bacillales, though readers can refer to Gherardi et al. [4], Little and Ivins [5], Ehling-Schulz et al. [6], Hansen et al. [7], and Madigan et al. [8] on these topics.
Herein, we provided an overview of the order Bacillales with the recent updates in the number of families and genera allocated to this order and elucidated its taxonomical complications. As the genus Bacillus plays essential roles in the various industrial fields, we considered it separately due to its clinical significance. Moreover, the present review focused on new and less-known genera, providing a good background for their biotechnological potential. In the concluding part of the review, we introduced some examples of engineered strains belonging to the various species of the order Bacillales.

2. Order Bacillales

2.1. Taxonomy

In the revised roadmap of the phylum Firmicutes, Ludwig et al. 2009 delineated the Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980), the type order of the class Bacilli, to include eight families [9,10]. This followed the removal of two families, including Caryophanaceae Peshkoff 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) and the reassignment of its type genus, Caryophanon, to Planococcaceae Krasilnikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980), despite the priority of the former family [9,11]. Of note, the authors also questioned the descriptive validity of the name Caryophanaceae, thereby virtually promoting the propagation of the name Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980). The Approved Lists 1980 included the above families and the orders Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 and Bacillales Prévot 1953 [11]. As highlighted recently by Tindall 2019, the list did not provide a clear recommendation for the assignment of taxa above the genus level and, since only one name could correctly represent the order, considering appropriate rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Considering the priority of Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 over Bacillales Prévot 1953 and the inclusion of the nomenclatural types of both, Caryophanon Peshkoff 1939 and Bacillus Cohn 1872, respectively, in the same order, the correct name of the order is Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 [12,13]. Thus, Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980) represents the later heterotypic synonyms of Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 [11,13]. Having clarified the taxonomy, we are inclined to use the name Bacillales in the current review as the community gets accustomed to the correct name, Caryophanales.
The Order Bacillales, the type order of the class Bacilli, was approved in the list of bacterial names in 1980 [2,14]. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology has completely described this order completely based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis and other polyphasic approaches such as chemotaxonomy and phenotypic methods [2,15]. Recently, based on the rules provided by The International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP), the name Caryophanales should be used instead of the name Bacillales. Since these names are heterotypic synonyms, however, the name approved first has the priority to be used. In this case, the name Caryophanales Peshkoff 1933 was approved prior to the name Bacillales Prévot 1953. Hence, the name Caryophanales Peshkoff 1933 is the correct name for the order Bacillales [13]. As the name Caryophanales is rarely used, and due to the earlier publication of the genus name Bacillus, the name Bacillales would be preferred to be used in this review.
As with other taxa, the previous classification of the order Bacillales relied heavily on 16S rRNA gene sequences, resulting in noticeable anomalies. For example, several spores- and non-spore-forming families and genera group together, suggesting that a single gene marker does not provide sufficient resolving power for delineating the order Bacillales [16]. Recent phylogenomic approaches, notably the work of de Maayer et al. 2019, attempted to resolve the evolutionary relationship among strains affiliated to the order based on comparative genomics [16,17].
Despite referencing the later heterotypic synonym, Bacillales, the authors proposed eleven distinct families in the order Bacillales and an unplaced group (Table 1).
The allocation of the Incertae sedis families agrees with the phylogenetic outline in volume 3 of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [2,14]. Although Bacillaceae is the most imposing and well-known family, Listeriaceae consisting of Listeria and Brochothrix is also noteworthy. Moreover, Pasteuriaceae, some genera of the family Paenibacillaceae such as Gorillibacterium or Brevibacillus, and Staphylococcus have clinical and pathological importance [2,8]. Based on a consensus phylogenomic strategy, de Maayer et al. resolved the observed anomalies in the family Bacillaceae. For instance, although the genus Staphylococcus comprises pathogenic strains previously grouped in the family Micrococcaceae, the phylogenetic and molecular analysis did not reveal any close relationships between them, resulting in the proposal for a new family Staphylococcaceae [16]. However, the precise identification of its members at the species level needs arduous efforts and may fail if based only on phenotypic approaches [4]. Another heterogeneous and polyphyletic family in this order is Planococcaceae, with many phylogenetic works focused on the history of its evolution, but its demarcation remains unresolved [16,18,19]. The classification in this family is based on 16S rRNA gene nucleotide signature, phenotypic characteristics, and observed branching in the drawn phylogenetic trees. However, these methods do not have enough resolving power at the genus and species level and cause significant overlap with other species of the families Bacillaceae and Incertae sedis 19 [16]. It is noteworthy that Planococcaceae represents the later heterotypic synonym of Caryophanaceae, as highlighted earlier by Tindal [13] and recently supported by Gupta and Patal [20].
Below the family level, the 16s rRNA gene-based classification of the genus Bacillus and especially the Cereus clade also represents some challenges [21]. This method remains the gold standard for assigning microbial strains to various taxa due to its low-cost and reproducibility between laboratories worldwide, providing us with an overview of the microbial strains for further research. At present, the Cereus clade comprises B. cereus, B. anthracis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus pseudomycoides, Bacillus cytotoxicus, and Bacillus toyonensis. Different phylogenomics approaches have clarified the interrelationship of the otherwise incoherent genus Bacillus [6,21,22]. Gupta et al. 2020 also showed that a subset of the core proteins of Bacillus species, including concatenated proteins GyrA_B-RpoB-C and PolA-UvrD, provide consistent clustering strain in the genus [4,23]. In addition to whole genome approaches, which provide consistent means of identifying and classifying Bacillales at different taxonomic ranks, relevant techniques for identifying industrially important strains may be pertinent toward effective industrial deployment [16,24,25].
Table 1. List of families assigned to the order Bacillales [2,13,14,16,20,22,26,27].
Table 1. List of families assigned to the order Bacillales [2,13,14,16,20,22,26,27].
Family NameProposed byIJSEM 1 Validation List No. (Year)Type GenusInvolved Valid and Invalid Genera Until 2022 in LPSN 2Valid Genera with Correct Name until 2022 in LPSN
Alicyclobacillaceaeda Costa and Rainey 2010132 (2010)Alicyclobacillus55
BacillaceaeFischer 1895(1980)Bacillus134117
CaryophanaceaePeshkoff 1939(1980)Caryophanon2619
DesulfuribacillaceaeSorokin et al. 2021200 (2021)Desulfuribacillus11
ListeriaceaeLudwig et al. 2010132 (2010)Listeria32
PaenibacillaceaeDe Vos et al. 2010132 (2010)Paenibacillus1916
PasteuriaceaeLaurent 1890(1980)Pasteuria11
SporolactobacillaceaeLudwig et al. 2010132 (2010)Sporolactobacillus55
StaphylococcaceaeSchleifer and Bell 2010132 (2010)Staphylococcus1210
ThermoactinomycetaceaeMatsuo et al. 2006(2007)Thermoactinomyces2524
Incertae sedis 46---11
1 International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2 List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature.

2.2. General Characteristics

General characteristics of bacteria include a wide range of features such as the shape and arrangement of the bacterial cells, cell wall chemical type, spore formation ability, motility, growth conditions, and resistance and tolerance to antibiotics. [8,28]. Interestingly, the genera of order Bacillales are phenotypically diverse. For example, cell shapes change from spherical to filamentous and may be motile by flagella. Oxygen requirement has a broad range from strictly aerobic, microaerophilic, facultative anaerobic, and aerotolerant to strictly anaerobic [2,29]. One of the most important characteristics of the order Bacillales is endospore formation, although some exceptions exist [2,3]. However, these exceptions remained to be clarified whether from one side lacking the genes for spore formation, or losing all or some of them during evolution, or alternatively, unfavorable physiological conditions cause unsuccessful spore formation [17]. Furthermore, the cell wall of order Bacillales stains Gram-positive for young cells, in general, but some genera react Gram-negatively, such as Aidingibacillus, Aquisalibacillus, Bhargavaea, Caldibacillus, Caryophanon, Exiguobacterium, Mammaliicoccus, Novibacillus, Sediminibacillus, and Thalassorhabdus [2,14,29,30]. Additionally, most of the genera allocated to this order have menaquinone 7 (MK-7) as their respiratory quinone, while various exceptions have been found [2].

3. Genus Bacillus

3.1. Genotypic Characteristics

In the taxonomic outline of phylum Firmicutes and the order Bacillales, the family Bacillaceae contains 117 validly published genera, of which the type genus is Bacillus. For the first time, in 1872, Ferdinand Cohn, a German bacteriologist, described Gram-positive endospore-forming rods and, therefore, named them Bacillus [2,22]. Afterward, many types of research have been carried out on this genus providing valuable information about it and revealing various potentials and new features of the genus Bacillus. However, new investigations are currently being conducted around the world to clarify the evolutionary history of this divergent genus [22,26]. Based on phylogenetic studies, there are various clades consisting of several species within the genus Bacillus [2,14,31]. Particularly, 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis is not effective lonely to differentiate species or strains within species, and other approaches, such as DNA/DNA hybridization (DDH), whole-cell proteins profile, RFLP, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) using housekeeping genes such as glpF (glycerol uptake facilitator protein), gyrB (DNA gyrase subunit B), ilvD (dihydroxy-acid dehydratase), gmk (guanylate kinase, putative), pycA (pyruvate carboxylase), pta (phosphate acetyltransferase), pur (phosphoribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide), tpi (triosephosphate isomerase), and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) or average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIb), should be tested for precise results [2,23,32,33,34,35]. In general, polyphyly and excessive heterogeneity of species in the genus Bacillus are due to delicate criteria used in the last decades to allocate numerous species with different phenotypic properties to this genus. Therefore, the genus Bacillus shows great diversity as some species do not even have a common evolutionary history with the type species (Bacillus subtilis). In recent years, many species were reclassified, and novel genera such as Gracilibacillus, Virgibacillus, Solibacillus, Ureibacillus, and Alicyclobacillus were produced [22]. Up to now, genomes of 225 species of the genus Bacillus in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database have been sequenced; however, genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis can provide the opportunity to check evolutionary relationships of species making it possible to identify molecular markers (molecular synapomorphies) [22,36]. Molecular synapomorphies, which comprise conserved signature inserts and deletions (CSIs) in protein sequences, are consistent means for differentiating species from two main clades of the genus Bacillus, i.e., ‘Subtilis clade’ and ‘Cereus Clade’. Based on Rule 56a of the ICNP, species transfer from the Cereus clade into a novel genus may threaten human health; hence, it is not a logical and advisable transfer. However, all other species of the genus Bacillus not belonging to these clades should be transferred to new genera by means of reliable identification approaches [37]. According to evidence obtained from comparative genomic analysis of Bacillaceae species and 36 novel CSIs (Three unique CSIs from each clade of Firmus, Jeotgali, and Simplex; six CSIs from Fastidiosus clade; 10 CSIs from Alcalophilus clade; and 11 CSIs from Niacini clade), 103 misclassified and unrelated species of the genus Bacillus were assigned and moved to novel proposed species. Moreover, phylogenomic analysis was carried out on protein datasets such as core proteins and conserved proteins in the phylum Firmicutes. Additionally, concatenated sequences of highly conserved proteins such as PolA, RpoB, RpoC, GyrA, GyrB, and UvrD were analyzed. Interestingly, monophyletic groups observed in all reconstructed phylogenetic trees were named Alcalophilus, Fastidiosus, Firmus, Jeotgali, Niacini, and Simplex clades and confirmed through comprehensive comparative genomic analysis of aforementioned protein sequences [22].

3.2. Phenotypic, Chemotaxonomic, and Morphological Characteristics

Based on morphological studies, cells of the genus Bacillus are straight or slightly curved, Gram-positive, or even Gram-negative rod-shaped with round-ended except Cereus clade members that have squared-ended cells, singly or in pairs, sometimes chains, or long filaments that can produce very variable colonies from raised to convex, small to large, circular to the irregular shape and smooth to rough texture with entire to fimbriate edges under different growth conditions but the recognition of Bacillus colonies in the routine growth media such as nutrient agar or tryptic soy agar is not too difficult. In addition, it should be noted that if the staining slide is prepared from the old culture, it would be stained Gram-negatively and may cause a misunderstanding of the precise Gram type of the cell wall. Normally, the most common cross-linkage in the cell wall of the genus Bacillus is meso-diaminopimelic acid (meso-DAP) direct murein, but infrequently, other types of cross-linkage, including l-Lys-d-Glu, Orn-d-Glu, and l-Orn-d-Asp, have been reported. The cytoplasm of cells can be observed as an area less refractive than a spore by phase-contrast microscopy. This vacuolated area is due to storage materials that are produced in the presence of fermentable carbohydrates such as glucose [2,28].
Bacillus species can form only one endospore in a cell, and many factors like manganese ions, the depletion of nutritional elements in the medium, cell density, desiccation, or the fluctuation in pH or temperature can induce sporulation [3,38,39]. Spore formation is one of the most valuable characteristics used to identify Bacillus species. The genus Bacillus has widespread habitats as its species can be isolated mostly from soils or other environmental sources, including air, sediments, sludges, fresh or marine waters, hot springs (acidophiles and thermophiles), soda lakes (alkaliphiles), hypersaline lakes, or salterns (halophiles), clinical specimens, foods, wastes, composts or manures, animals appendages like feathers, invertebrates, stone surface, clean rooms, and wall paintings. This diversity impressively shows that the members of this genus can be active metabolically in various environments, but it needs more research to find out all of the interactions taking place between them and other microorganisms living together [2,3,35,40].
Bacillus growth requirement (one of the most considerable characteristics for the identification of species) demonstrates very wild diversity within the genus, but these are not so complicated; also, most species can grow heterotrophically on simple or enriched media such as nutrient agar or blood agar, respectively. In addition, the Bacillus genus can utilize or assimilate carbohydrates unless for the mentioned exceptions, such as Bacillus benzoevorans which requires benzoate or acetate salts for its growth [41]. Furthermore, some species need special conditions for growth, e.g., alkaliphiles that love alkalinity environments or halophilic ones that need sodium ions for their growth [42]. Most species do not need growth factors like vitamins; however, yeast extract can be useful to stimulate growth. In general, Bacillus species are chemoorganotrophic, but some strains can exhibit chemolithotrophic growth [2].
Another general characteristic of Bacillus is the growth temperature range from low (−2–20 °C) (psychrophiles) to very high (>50–70 °C) (thermophiles) temperatures, but most of the species prefer to grow under mesophilic conditions (25–40 °C and usually 30 °C). Oxygen requirement varies from aerobic, facultative anaerobic to strictly anaerobic within the genus so that most species can produce catalase, while some of them can produce oxidase. Despite the high diversity of Bacillus species, most of them are not recognized as pathogenic agents in humans or animals. However, there are some exceptions, the most considerable of which is B. anthracis causing anthrax. However, a few species cause food poisoning, and some of them may act as opportunistic agents in cases with immune deficiency [2,29].
Several general characteristics have been mentioned for the identification of the genus Bacillus, but not all of them play any significant role in the taxonomy of this genus. For example, L-form cells that have lost their cell wall as the stable type cannot return to the original shape, and the spheroplasts can revert to the original bacterial form in the genus Bacillus. Thus, this is not a crucial characteristic in taxonomical studies [2,43]. Moreover, another example refers to the capsule -a sticky layer around the cell. Its types are discussed among Bacillus species so that some species produce polysaccharide capsules, and others produce poly-γ-d-glutamic acid capsules, while several species, such as Bacillus megaterium (now Priestia megaterium), can form both types. Capsule looks like a double-edged structure that can be useful in the soybean fermentation process or act as a virulence factor to help the colonization of pathogenic species in a host [2,28]. In addition to the capsule, some species of the genus Bacillus can form two-dimensional stable and porous surface layers. These layers are composed of protein self-assembly or glycoprotein molecules. S-layer is not a valuable marker in the taxonomy, and often its presence is strain-dependent [2,44]. Motility is another character that is not considered an appropriate tool for the taxonomy of this genus. Though, it is typically used to describe most species [45]. Many techniques are applied to improve bacterial taxonomy, including fatty acids analysis, whole-cell proteins profile, phage-typing, and serotyping, so these may be essential to differentiate strains of a species [2,8].

3.3. Pathological Importance

A few species of the genus Bacillus are related to diseases in humans or animals, including invertebrates. The main pathogenic species is B. anthracis, which has been categorized as a bioterrorism agent. Principally, this species causes a bacterial infection in herbivorous animals, and before the 1930s, it was the most important causative agent in the mortality of livestock such as horses, cattle, or sheep [46,47]. Development and progress in vaccination have decreased the incidence rate of anthrax. However, this disease is marked as endemic in many countries in Asia, Africa, and even Europe. B. anthracis cannot be eradicated because of the long-lasting existence of its spore in the ecosystems like soils. Anthrax in humans includes cutaneous, intestinal, and inhalational infections, among which the cutaneous is the most common form and the latter is the more lethal form. Since it is not recognizable in the initial steps, it would be too difficult to do appropriate treatments. In this species, two plasmids are responsible for the pathogenicity and virulence factor named pXO1 and pXO2, respectively. The pXO1 encodes the toxin complex, including three modules, protective antigen (PA), edema factor (EF), and lethal factor (LF), none of which are individually toxic. The pXO2 contains capsule genes that are responsible for the production of a proteinaceous polymer. It consists of γ-d-glutamic acid with a negative charge as its monomeric subunits and plays a protective role in struggling phagocytosis in the host. However, by conducting the plasmid curing in the cells, they will be efficiently converted into avirulent strains [5,6].
B. cereus is already known as the second important toxigenic species of the genus Bacillus that causes food poisoning syndromes—diarrhoeal and emetic types—or even opportunistic sicknesses because of its spores. They can tolerate normal cooking processes and acidic conditions of the stomach to survive and produce toxins in the small intestine. This species can be easily found in meats, eggs, and herbal foods like fried rice or dairy products. Additionally, several strains of this species can be infectious in the animals like cattle [2,35]. However, there are some reports about the strains that can be applied for biotechnological applications, e.g., fungicidal materials produced by B. cereus UW85 (34). In addition, B. thuringiensis, one of the Cereus clade members, is an invertebrates’ pathogen typically used as a biocontrol agent. This species produces an insecticidal crystalline in its spore that is structurally proteinaceous endotoxin and encoded by the conjugative plasmids affecting insects such as butterflies, beetles, moths, flies, or even some of the nematodes, protozoa, mites, and flatworms [2,48,49,50]. As there are more than 80 types of this protein, its nomenclature is not easily defined; therefore, a committee was established in 1993 to update the old nomenclature based on amino acid identity. For further information about the newly constructed databases, the readers are referred to visit http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/intro.html, accessed on 22 November 2022. There are a few reports about the pathogenicity of the other species within the genus Bacillus. Molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity and further information about these mentioned species have already been discussed in numerous articles and books; therefore, they will not be at the center of our attention in this review.

3.4. Sporulation and Spore Properties

The ability of microorganisms that produce resistant forms is to survive in adverse conditions that can be lethal for the vegetative cells. Various research about spores has been conducted, but there are still unknown details about their molecular mechanisms, genetics, and resistance properties [51,52]. A spore is an optically refractive body whose shape can be ranged from cylindrical, ellipsoidal, spherical, or irregular forms in the genus Bacillus. Moreover, the position of the spore within the cell is important and can be used in the identification of the species. Spores may be located in the central, paracentral, subterminal, or terminal positions of the cells. However, within a species, often, strains exhibit some variations in the shape or even in the position of spores. Depending on the sporangia size, it can be swollen, but non-swollen sporangia are common in the genus Bacillus [2].
Sporulation is a sophisticated process that causes spore formation—the most durable form of life on the earth—during a few hours. Both internal and external signals affect the cell to make a decision for the initiation of the sporulation. In exposure to sufficient amounts of water and nutrients such as sugars or amino acids, especially L-alanine, and under favorable conditions, germination of the spore will occur, and new vegetative cells will emerge. Spore formation has been studied completely in B. subtilis strain 168 as a model and contains several stages that commence with the phosphorylation of an important transcriptional regulatory protein named Spo0A [38,39,53]. Spo0A is a master regulator which controls the expression of more than 120 genes directly and can affect the expression of over 500 genes interfering in the sporulation. In addition to Spo0A, the accurate and correct function of specific sigma factors ensure successive process [38]. At the beginning stage, the vegetative cell undergoes an asymmetric cell division, and an axial filament of the cell chromosome forms. A specific area of the elongated chromosome migrates toward one of the cell poles, and then the forespore configures gradually. One the bases of the spore formation model, this process can consist of seven stages: 1, pre-septation or axial filament formation; 2, asymmetric division; 3, forespore formation; 4, spore cortex formation; 5, synthesis of spore coats proteins and their deposition out of the cortex; 6, maturation of spore; 7, lysis of the sporangium and spore releasing [2]. Although morphological aspects of this process are the same among aerobic endospore-forming bacteria, there might be some differences between genera. The spore is metabolically inactive with a complex ultrastructural core. It involves DNA, RNA, proteins, dipicolinic acid (pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid, DPA), and calcium ions surrounded by various layers including inner membrane, cell wall, cortex, outer membrane, inner spore coats, outer spore coats, and exosporium from the innermost to outermost, respectively [54]. These layers are responsible for the protection of spores against solvents and chemicals, degradative enzymes, desiccation, thermal shocks, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and other stresses [2,51,55]. It is hard to say what is the exact mechanism of spore resistance to these stresses, but it is also assumed small acid-soluble proteins (SASPs) play a significant role in protecting the chromosomal part of the spore [51]. A spore is a resistant form of life in endospore-forming bacteria. Therefore, these kinds of bacteria are in the spotlight of research for industrial applications. Moreover, Bacillus spores are used in spore surface display technology and many other applications, such as metal bioremediation (17) or biosensors [56]. Later, we will point out in detail about this group of bacteria, particularly endospore-forming genera of the order Bacillales.

3.5. Industrial Applications

Nowadays, the genus Bacillus is variously used for industrial purposes and can be recognized as generally recognized as safe (GRAS), i.e., non-toxicogenic and non-pathogenic. What makes this genus one of the most potent microorganisms in the industry involves metabolic diversity, precise understanding of genetics and physiology, non-pathogenicity except for a few species, fast growth rates, high cell density, noteworthy resistance to harsh conditions, and production of various metabolites such as enzymes, amino acids, vitamins, surfactants, and bioactive compounds [29,55,57,58,59,60,61]. At present, the usage of enzymes is not only limited to laboratories or research, but also, they are used in our homes. Enzymes of this genus occupy approximately 50% of the total marketplace, and the best commercial suppliers are Novo Nordisk (Denmark) and Genencor International (USA), but many other companies throughout the world are supplying Bacillus enzymes [55]. The majority of Bacillus-produced enzymes are extracellular; however, this genus can produce substantial intracellular enzymes such as glucose iso-merase, as discussed in Section 3.5.1, glycerokinase [62], glucokinase [63], leucine dehydrogenase [64,65], superoxide dismutase [66], and Rhodanese [67]. Table 2 shows the most important enzymes produced by various Bacillus spp. and their applications. Among these species, Bacillus licheniformis is a remarkable species for the production of extracellular enzymes such as β-lactamase, thermostable α-amylase, and protease in large scales [68]. Having considered the different abilities and usages in the industry, we summarized the genus Bacillus applications in several parts followed.

3.5.1. Food Industry

For a long time, microorganisms have been used in the food industry, mainly in dairy and fermented products. One of the most commercially significant species of this genus is B. subtilis which can secret produced enzymes into the media. It is also applied on a large scale to make natto (itihiki-natto) from soybeans, a traditional Japanese fermented food [55]. In 2008, B. subtilis was approved by European Food Safety Authority as a qualified presumption of safety (QPS). Moreover, it can be used as a GRAS host for the production of recombinant compounds as He et al. [27,57,69,70] constructed a food-grade recombinant B. subtilis cable to transform D-fructose to D-allulose, an uncommon sugar for the substitution of sucrose in the food industry. Another GRAS species is Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, the most imperative species for the worldwide production of hydrolytic enzymes. Its β-glucanases can be used in the wine industry to reduce the maturation process. Moreover, its metalloproteases have been used to prevent protein fogs in beer or to decrease the gluten content in cookies or biscuits flours. Iso-amylase and α-amylase produced by this species are abundantly used for the syrups preparation, liquefaction of starch, corn starch, brewing industry, and many other applications, such as textile and paper industries [28,51,69,71]. B. amyloliquefaciens was isolated in 1943 but approved in 1987 based on rules 24a and 28a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (ICNB) [69,72].
In addition, Bacillus polymyxa CECT 155 (now Paenibacillus polymyxa), Bacillus sp. US 149, Bacillus sp. KSM-1876, Bacillus sp. KSM 1378, Fontibacillus sp. strain DSHK from the family Paenibacillaceae, and Pullulanibacillus naganoensis strain AE-PL from the family Sporolactobacillaceae can hydrolyze different oligo- or polysaccharides by producing a variety of debranching enzymes of the family pullulanase that break α- 1,6 linkages. Latter production has been used in the food industry [73,74]. Generally, these enzymes are used to manufacture concentrated glucose or high maltose corn syrups used in the production of candy and ice cream, as the sweeteners in beverages, or as the improving agents in the bakery industry. Furthermore, this enzyme family, in combination with alkaline α-amylase, can be applied as a detergent in dishwashing or laundry to remove starchy spots or as lubricants, emulsifiers, thickening and gelling agents [73,75]. In addition to extracellular enzymes, D-xylose iso-merase (glucose iso-merase) produced by Bacillus coagulans (now Weizmannia coagulans) is the earliest instance of an intracellular and immobilized enzyme used in the food industry. It is used to prepare the high fructose corn syrups wildly applied as sweeteners in diabetic foods because they do not need insulin to be metabolized in the body. This enzyme is very well-matched with industrial conditions as the optimal temperature and pH for its activity are 55–65 °C and 7–9, respectively, which are significant factors in starch hydrolyzing [29,55,75]. Presently, some Bacillus species are used for the fermentation and post-harvesting processes of foods and grains. For example, P. megaterium can produce short-chain fatty acids during the latest stage of cacao beans fermentation which, along with other chemicals, contributes to an off-flavored smell [76]. Bacillus circulans (now Niallia circulans), in addition to B. amyloliquefaciens, is another commercial producer of β-glucanases [29].
Along with enzymes, Bacillus species can produce various bioactive compounds such as antiviral and antitumor agents, antimicrobial small peptides (AMPs), or bacteriocins such as tyrocidine, gramicidin, polymyxin, amylolysin, and bacitracin, the latter of which inhibits the growth of Streptococcus pyogenes proficiently [77,78]. These species include B. licheniformis [79], B. mycoides [80], Bacillus halodurans (now Halalkalibacterium halodurans), Bacillus mojavensis [81], Bacillus pumilus WAPB4 [82], Bacillus sonorensis MT93 [83], Bacillus sp. P11 [84], B. amyloliquefaciens [85], and B. subtilis [36]. Antimicrobial small peptides can be used as food preservatives to improve the quality of foods and prevent spoilage [59]. For instance, cerein 8A has been applied in soft cheese and milk to control the growth of Listeria monocytogenes [86]. AMPs-producers are in the spotlight of the pharmaceutical industry and medicine, which will discuss in the following section.
Bacillus whole cells and spores are broadly used as probiotics (Generally live microorganisms that provide health benefits when eaten in acceptable dosage) in human foods, supplements, livestock feed, and aquafarming to promote the growth of aquatic organisms and decrease the chemical food additives applications as much as possible [57,87,88]. The best examples of Bacillus probiotics are Bacillus clausii (now Shouchella clausii), W. coagulans, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, and B. cereus. Spore formation in this genus makes it a convenient choice compared to other probiotics like Lactobacillus or yeasts, which do not form a spore. Therefore, it is possible to store them at ambient temperature without any problems. Consequently, it reduces preservation and shelf costs. It is shown that Bacillus probiotics can stimulate the immune system and have antimicrobial activities due to their bioproducts. Nevertheless, microorganisms and their products should be considered under regulatory roles and assessments such as QPS to ensure consumers. Moreover, it should be verified that these microorganisms and products do not threaten human and other organisms’ life via toxigenic and antibiotic resistance genes [36,87,89].

3.5.2. Pharmaceutical Industry

The current pharmaceutical industry emerged in the late nineteenth century but studying the history indicates our ancestors were able to find curative herbal drugs from nature based on trial and error [90,91]. In this industry, microorganisms are substantial sources of growth hormones, insulin, monoclonal antibodies (mAb), or recombinant interferon production. Whatever has led pharmaceutical companies to change their upstream strategies from animal-based to cell-factory-based production is associated with hypersensitivity of the human body to animal serum and the contamination risk of biopharmaceuticals with prions [92]. Escherichia coli is the most universally used host to produce recombinant proteins, though B. subtilis is an adequate alternative to be used frequently as a host for sustainable products. It can affect the downstream processing of biopharmaceuticals [55,93]. The lack of an outer membrane containing lipopolysaccharides (LPS) is an important property that convinced the pharmaceutical industry to use the genus Bacillus instead of Gram-negative bacteria. In general, LPS are stated as endotoxins interfering purification of final products. Moreover, the secretion capacity of this genus has made it more attractive than E. coli since this ability may result in the natural exudation of the products into the media, which, in turn, can facilitate downstream processing [94]. However, it should be noted that there are few reports regarding the production of human recombinant proteins in the genus Bacillus as a host. Influential reasons that restricted Bacillus usage for the production of these proteins relate to the lack of applicable expression systems, instability of plasmids, degradation of produced proteins by proteases, and protein misfolding. However, numerous empirical solutions have been found to overcome these problems due to a wide range of research, such as omics approaches and metabolic engineering, conducted accordingly [94,95,96].
Undeniably, the discovery of antibiotics has been effective in revolutionizing medicine and treating infectious diseases. In general, antibiotics are one of the significant pharmaceutical products produced by microorganisms or synthetically by man. In addition to fungi, the genus Bacillus can produce four classes of antibiotics; cyclic or liner small oligopeptides, basic peptides, and aminoglycoside compounds [77]. These antibiotics can be classified based on synthesis mechanisms and ribosomal or non-ribosomal pathways [97]. Many species like B. subtilis produce more than one type of bacteriocins, such as subtilin, sublancin 168, iturin, mycobacillin, fengycin, and pumilacidin, or surfactin with surfactant activity [98,99]. Surfactin is a robust, low-toxic and biodegradable lipopeptide biosurfactant synthesized non-ribosomally by a synthetase complex. Its properties make it suitable to be used in many industries, particularly in oil recovery. In the presence of this biomolecule, the wettability index of a system can be changed because of a decrease in the interfacial tension between organic materials and water interfaces [36,100,101,102].
Another important bacteriocin is bacitracin, the first AMP discovered in B. licheniformis culture, which is broadly used in human and veterinary medicines [103,104]. In addition to the antibacterial activity of AMPs, these compounds showed anticancer or antifungal activities [105]. However, the new generation of antibiotics should be effective against drug-resistant pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Acinetobacter baumannii that are very serious causative agents in nosocomial infections and treat public health. Nevertheless, what is essential to control these resistant strains relates to researchers’ attempt to exploit such abilities (broad-spectrum, fast killing, and high efficacy) among Bacillus-produced AMPs by using cutting-edge approaches, isolating new strains from unusual environments or making modified types of them using bioengineering [106]. For therapeutic applications in humans, it should not be neglected to study their mechanism of action, immunogenicity, and toxicity before clinical trials. Another substantial potential of Bacillus species, especially B. cereus, in the pharmaceutical industry is related to their ability to produce β-lactamases (Type I and II). These enzymes are responsible for the resistance to β-lactam antibiotics where the infected patients cannot be recovered and need to be treated with non-β-lactam antibiotics. Beyond the clinical importance of β-lactamases, these enzymes can be used in the microbiological assay, sterility testing in the antibiotic industry, or susceptibility assay of novel antibiotics to β-lactamases [29].
Table 2. Most important enzymes produced by various Bacillus spp.
Table 2. Most important enzymes produced by various Bacillus spp.
Species NameEnzyme ClassMain Industrial ApplicationReference
B. amyloliquefaciens
B. subtilis
B. thuringiensis
Extracellular metalloproteaseLeather industry[107,108,109]
B. amyloliquefaciens
B. licheniformis
B. subtilis
B. pumilus
Serine proteaseDetergent industry
Antifungal agent
[110,111,112,113]
B. alcalophilus
B. amyloliquefaciens
B. licheniformis
B. subtilis
B. thuringiensis
α-AmylaseStarch and food industries[114,115,116,117,118]
B. cereus var. mycoidesβ-AmylaseStarch industry[119]
B. cereus FDTA-13
Thermophilic Bacillus sp. AN-7
pullulanase[120,121]
Bacillus sp. CICIM 304Iso-amylase[122]
Bacillus sp. CSB55
B. subtilis
β-glucanase[123,124]
B. subtilis
B. licheniformis
β-lactamase (Penicillinase)Molecular Biology Antibiotic industry[125,126]
B. licheniformisGlucose iso-meraseFood industry[127]
Bacillus methylotrophicus
B. subtilis
LevansucraseFood and pharmaceutical industries[128,129]
B. subtilis
B. pseudomycoides
B. licheniformis
CellulaseBiofuel industry[130,131,132]
Bacillus australimaris
Bacillus tequilensis
XylanaseBiofuel and paper industries[133,134]
B. licheniformis
Bacillus sp. G-825-6
Bacillus sp. ND1
Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase)Pharmaceutical, food and cosmetic industries[135,136,137]
B. subtilis E9
B. mojavensis TH309
EsteraseBiodegradation[138,139]
B. thuringiensis
B. licheniformis B307
ChitinaseBiocontrol agent[140,141]
B. velezensis TA3
B.cereus
B. subtilis
TannaseDelignification process[142,143,144]

3.5.3. Agricultural Industry

It is quite obvious that B. thuringiensis—discovered by Shigetane Ishiwatari in 1902—is the most related species in the agricultural industry. As discussed earlier, this species has been considered a biocontrol agent for invertebrates, especially insects, due to its spore endotoxins and secondary metabolites [59,145]. Its sporangium is identified by parasporal inclusions of crystalline Bt endotoxins. These kinds of inclusions can be produced by Lysinibacillus sphaericus, which is toxic for mosquito larvae. Therefore, this should be noted to avoid confusion in the identification process of these species [35,146]. Some Bt toxins (Vip toxins) can be produced in vegetative cells, but the main production phase is during sporulation [147]. In addition to this toxic crystalline structure, B. thuringiensis produces phospholipase C, proteases, and hemolysins as virulence factors, but they are not adequate for a strain to be a pathogen [148,149]. Two types of Bt toxins have been identified, Cyt and Cry toxins [150]. Attempts to discover more insecticidal genes among toxigenic strains are continuing. For example, cryI gene encodes the toxic protein for lepidopterans, while cryII and cryIII genes encode toxins for dipterans and coleopterans, respectively [151]. One of the suggested action modes of Bt toxins (activated by insect midgut proteases) in the target insect is midgut epithelial cell death by forming ionic pores into the membrane and following osmotic lysis [152]. Another proposed mechanism refers to the activation of the Mg2+-dependent signal cascade pathway via the adhesion of toxin to the primary receptor. This pathway can cause swelling and nuclear ghosts, and, eventually, cell death [153].
In the agricultural industry, toxicogenic products of B. thuringiensis (viable spore and poisonous proteins) are formulated into a powder, granule, or liquid to be applied for the corps and farms [48]. As Bt toxins affect the pests selectively and do not accumulate in the environment, it is broadly preferred over chemical pesticides that have non-specific actions, causing an increase in pesticide-resistant pests and hazardous effects in the environment [154,155]. However, unremitting usage of Bt toxins as a biocontrol agent should be avoided to prevent the incidence of resistance and also cross-resistance to these toxins (it means an insect population that was resistant to a specific toxin shows resistance to a toxin that has not been exposed before) [156]. Resistance modes include attenuating toxin binding to the cell receptors, reducing protoxin solubilization, toxin degradation, or altering toxin processing. Another disadvantage of Bt toxins is related to a narrow spectrum of their activity, particularly in cloned toxins in contrast to chemical pesticides. Therefore, it is so important to find successful strategies to improve toxins activity and contiguous usage to control pests in the fields [157].
In addition to B. thuringiensis, there are many species related to the agricultural industry, like diazotrophic Bacillus spp., for fixing molecular nitrogen. In general, nitrogen fixation is an essential process that molecular N2 is converted into ammonia for the biosynthesis of life macromolecules. Nitrogen fixation has been demonstrated in L. sphaericus, P. megaterium, B. cereus, and B. licheniformis isolated from plants’ rhizosphere. Some other strains may be classified in the genus Paenibacillus [158]. At the same time, recent phylogenetic research restricted aerobic spore-forming bacteria with nitrogen fixation capability to the genus Paenibacillus [159]. Perhaps, nitrogen-fixing Bacillus spp. promotes plant growth through the production of hormones such as auxins (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA) and inceases accessibility of nutritional materials through phosphate solubilization or iron acquisition (by siderophores such as schizokinen, bacillibactin, and petrobactin) [3,160]. Moreover, these bacteria can quench ethylene production, interact with other rhizosphere microorganisms, increase nodulation in roots, and produce antibiotics or fungicidal compounds (produced by Bacillus velezensis RC 218, Bacillus endophyticus (now Priestia endophytica), Bacillus insolitus (now Psychrobacillus insolitus), P. megaterium, B. subtilis, B. pumilus, B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42, and B. licheniformis) to protect plants from phytopathogens [2,146,161]. One of these products, named zwittermicin A, is an unusual linear aminopolyol compound and prevents fungal disease in plants [162,163]. Commercial examples of these fungicides are known as Ballad Plus, Sonata, and Biobest [164]. Recently, by genomic data mining, the discovery of antimicrobial gene clusters in the Bacillus strains has increased and made a big picture of these new antimicrobial compounds and their structures and activities [165].

3.5.4. Other Industrial Applications of the Genus Bacillus

Unquestionably, the genus Bacillus plays a significant role in well-known industries. Moreover, with the different capabilities, it can be applied to problems that may need to be solved biologically. At present, various environmental issues are attractive for environmentalists and researchers to find efficient strategies to rescue ecosystems, remediated soils, waters, and air, and protect them from further damage. One of these strategies is related to the use of microorganisms and their capacities for the degradation of pollutants or remediation of contaminated areas. In this context, there are many examples of efficient microorganisms. There are many Bacillus species with the ability to change inorganic compounds by respiration. For example, Bacillus subterraneus (now Mesobacillus subterraneus) and Bacillus infernus can carry out nitrate respiration and use iron III, MnO2, and nitrate as electron acceptors [2]. It seems these species have a substantial role in the biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen and carbon, sulfur, phosphorous, and manganese [36]. It should be noted that some species can absorb metals non-enzymatically and aggregate them on their surfaces. In addition to the oxidation and reduction of inorganic materials, this genus can degrade, transform or metabolize intricate organic compounds, catalyze reactions that cannot be performed chemically, and remediate contaminated environments [2,3]. Based on the genus Bacillus’ diverse abilities, the petroleum industry is attentive to applying its species to solve existing problems that have not been unraveled by abiotic methods. For example, Bacillus spp., like Bacillus firmus (now Cytobacillus firmus), has a strain H2O-1 that can produce antibiotics against sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and can be an appropriate choice to prevent pipelines bio-corrosion and improve oil recovery in the underground oil reservoirs [146,166,167]. One novel application of Bacillus in the fuel industry is linked with ethanol production from concentrated date syrup by a new strain of B. amyloliquefaciens. It is reported that this strain can produce 0.35 g L−1 h−1 by fermenting glucose, sucrose, and fructose under the high osmotic pressure of concentrated date syrup. It seems that isolating new strains with unusual abilities is promising for their usage in the advanced biotechnological industry [168].
Fascinatingly, some species of the genus Bacillus isolated from marine or other sources can produce other secondary metabolites such as terpenes, antimicrobial fatty acids, and polyketides (PKs) in addition to AMPs. These secondary metabolites are synthesized by molecular complexes using proteins rather than nucleic acids as the templates, called polyketide synthases (PKSs). They are indeed grouped into three classes based on the genes which encoded proteins involved in the biosynthesis pathway: Type I (multi-domain and bulky proteins), II (separated proteins), and III [169,170]. Some examples of these compounds produced by B. amyloliquefaciens strains GA1 and FZB42 are difficidin 10, macrolactin 12, and bacillaene 11 [59,171,172]. There is an inclusive diversity in the structure and function of these biomaterials due to the modular synthesis. Therefore, it can be subjected to post-translational processing and modifications in the pharmaceutical industry for the designing and exploiting of new drugs or drug precursors [36,59,173]. In addition, B. subtilis and its mutants have a potential capacity for the industrial production of riboflavin, guanosine, inosine, and folic acid using the purine biosynthesis pathway [174]. Moreover, B. subtilis and B. pumilus, with a deficiency in their transketolase or D-ribulose-5-phosphate 3-epimerase, can produce D-ribose. This carbohydrate is commonly used as a taste enhancer in food and feed industries, pharmaceuticals, and muscular painkillers [175]. One of the other biomaterials whose production pathway was reported in some Bacillus species, such as B. licheniformis and B. subtilis, is polyglutamic acid, an anionic homopolyamide, which is edible, biodegradable, and soluble in water. This polymer can be used as a thickener agent, drug carrier, cryoprotectant agent, hydrogel, feed additive, or heavy metal absorbent in many fields [176,177].
It is known that the genus Bacillus is a valuable factory for enzyme production. Among those enzymes, extremozymes have an outstanding place in the industries. They are enzymes that are resistant to various and severe environmental factors such as acidic or alkaline conditions, high and low temperatures, or resistance to salinity, oxidizing agents, and detergents. For example, B. pumilus, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. licheniformis, B. mojavensis, and B. subtilis strains can produce alkaline serine proteases that have fine thermostability and optimal pH 9–12. These properties make them compatible for application in detergents, the leather industry for the dehairing process, silver recovery from X-ray films, etc. Bioengineering and optimization protocols have simplified extremozyme production (e.g., the protease of S. clausii and Bacillus pseudofirmus (now Alkalihalophilus pseudofirmus)) and improved enzyme properties such as pH activity ranges, substrate specificity, binding capacity, and stability. However, it is necessary to consider the disadvantages of these transgenic biomaterials [55,178].
In the following sections, we focused on the other genera of the order Bacillales and grouped various families based on the common characteristics, e.g., spore formation or tolerance to extreme conditions for their better understanding as well as applications except for the genus Bacillus that was discussed separately.

4. Spore-Forming Genera of Bacillales

The sporulation in bacteria is a resistance and survival response whenever the environmental conditions are not favorable. In the order Bacillales, almost most of the families and genera are able to sporulate. However, some asporogenous genera do not form spores, and there are few genera whose sporulation is not observed under routine laboratory conditions. Therefore, if the spore is not distinguished by microscopy, it will not be a good enough reason to call a strain non-spore former. Nearly sixty conserved genes are essential for sporulation. Any mutations affecting these genes may result in the loss of sporulation ability in a spore former [30]. Spore-forming genera of this order belong to the families Alicyclobacillaceae, Bacillaceae, Caryophanaceae, Desulfuribacillaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Pasteuriaceae, Sporolactobacillaceae, and Thermoactinomycetaceae. The family Bacillaceae includes most of the spore-forming genera in comparison to others [2,14]. Apart from the pathogenic spore-forming species, other members have attracted scientists’ attention to consider spore-forming models, DNA transmitters to space, carriers in surface display systems, biocontrol agents, enzyme factories, etc. [30]. Here, we focused on spore-forming genera (Supplementary Data; Table S1) and explained their significance in different areas, excluding the genus Bacillus considered previously. Moreover, some spore-forming genera with special abilities will be explained as extremophiles or polyextremophiles.

4.1. Alicyclobacillaceae Genera

Five genera are allocated to this family, Alicyclobacillus, Effusibacillus, Kyrpidia, Sulfobacillus, and Tumebacillus, which mostly form ovoid endospores in terminal or subterminal positions of swollen rod-shaped cells. Among these genera, Alicyclobacillus has special significance; therefore, it is one of the main spoilage causative agents in the beverage industry and its ingredient suppliers. This spore-forming rod-shaped genus is heat and acid-resistant (closely 100 °C due to resistant spores and pH range 2–6), which can tolerate the pasteurization process and is able to grow and produce phenolic odor such as 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol) and halophenols. However, there are not any pathogenic species within this genus up to now. They can utilize sugars and produce acid. The most important species concerned with unwanted odorous problems of spoiled beverages are Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius. Formerly, this strictly aerobic genus was classified as Bacillus; whereas, later, molecular approaches and its acid- and thermophilicity distinguished it from the genus Bacillus. Another characteristic that differentiates Alicyclobacillus is the existence of alicyclic radicals in the structural fatty acids that may contribute to condensing membrane lipids (low membrane fluidity) against high temperatures [2,179].
It is important to understand the physiology and resistance properties of A. acidoterrestris to prevent economic damage in commercial juice-based beverages. Studies on the AB-1 strain of this species showed that it can survive thermal processing conditions (90–95 °C for 30–60 s), resulting in the viability of the strain in pasteurized beverages. (Spore D-value of this species varies from 0.06 to 5.3 min at 95 °C). Other studies have indicated that spores of this species have greater heat resistance whenever the content of soluble solids (SSC) increases. The pH, growth temperature, and cell density (more thermo-protective proteins) are other effective factors that have a positive correlation with heat resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to find affordable ways to decrease the heat resistance of the spores. One of these ways refers to the usage of the agents which may reduce spore heat resistance, such as lysozyme, organic acids like benzoic acid, emulsifiers (sucrose-based), or nisin. It should be noted that lysozyme is not able to penetrate across the spore layers but owning to the permeability changing, it can meaningfully affect spore heat resistance. Moreover, supercritical CO2 is an effective treatment that explodes and deforms spores. An aqueous form of chlorine dioxide is frequently used to sanitize fruits, equipment, and containers in the production line of juice factories to reduce the probability of bacterial cells or spores in the final products. It seems that a combination of two or more inhibitory treatments can be applied to control most spore and vegetative cells in juices and reduce spoilage in this industry [179,180]. Regarding other genera of this family, there are not any interesting sources indicating their biotechnological or industrial applications. However, Kyrpidia can be considered a polyextremophilic genus that can grow under high acidity and temperature with the ability of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production [181]. Moreover, there are some reports regarding the Sulfobacillus species that can contribute to chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, and pyrrhotite bioleaching [182,183,184,185].

4.2. Bacillaceae Genera

The most important genus of this family, Bacillus, was considered in this review separately. Many genera of the family Bacillaceae can be studied as extremophilic or polyextremophilic microorganisms. Most of the genera can form spores with a few exceptions classified in the genus Bacillus till the 1990s, but later, based on new taxonomic approaches, new taxa were arranged, whereas 126 validly and not validly published genera composed of one or more species belong to this family up to now [3,14] (Supplementary Data; Table S2). Considerable genera with apparent industrial applications based on their various extraordinary abilities will be discussed in the related sections.

4.3. Paenibacillaceae Genera

This family includes 14 spore-forming genera; Brevibacillus is one of the most fascinating ones. This genus has been considered a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic Fusaria and other phytopathogens [186,187]. Mycotoxins are a serious global problem regarding nutritional safety and the economic issues of agriculture. Various fungal species can produce these toxins that commonly toxify various cereals like maize, wheat, corn, and rice. Whenever contaminated grains are consumed by humans or livestock, they may have highly destructive effects [187]. Hence, it would be better to prevent mycotoxins production by easier methods, such as biocontrol agents, rather than using a difficult detoxification process of cereals. Many species of Brevibacillus have been considered biological resources for the production of various enzymes, especially cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase used in cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and food industries, serine proteases, biomaterials caused improvement of plants growth or nodulation of roots, antimicrobial peptides, insecticidal agents, extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPSs), polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers, L-amino acids, etc. [188,189,190,191]. Additionally, Brevibacillus brevis strains can degrade many organic compounds such as triphenyltin, pyrene, triphenyl phosphate, or textile dyes, and their high resistance to heavy metals makes them the right choice to use in contaminated sites [192,193,194,195].
The type genus of Paenibacillaceae is Paenibacillus consists of important species and strains associated with nitrogen fixation, iron acquisition, enzymes, EPSs production, and desulfurization [196,197,198,199]. There are apparently more than 3000 articles about industrial and biotechnological applications of this genus, so it is impossible to discuss all the details in this review. Aneurinibacillus belonging to this family has been selected as a model to study S-layer properties during the last few years. It is a thermo- and acidotolerant spore-forming genus whose S-layer consists of glycoprotein subunits oriented in a square matrix. Two main required components for S-layer production in Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus are dTDP-3-acetamino-3,6-dideoxy-α-D-galactose and GDP-rhamnose, nucleotide activated sugars [200]. Moreover, gramicidin S production has been reported in Aneurinibacillus migulanus strains, thus providing a new source of this antibiotic for various purposes, particularly in the treatment of plant diseases [201,202].

4.4. Other Spore-Forming Genera and Their Significance

It is shown that there is a massive diversity among spore-forming genera able to survive in very severe conditions and produces a variety of biomolecules applied for particular purposes. In addition to previously discussed spore-forming genera, the families Caryophanaceae, Sporolactobacillaceae, Thermoactinomycetaceae, and Pasteuriaceae include genera that may have special biotechnological potentials. Pasteuria is the only genus of the family Pasteuriaceae considered the biocontrol for invertebrates such as nematodes since it is an obligatory parasitic genus [203,204]. Another possible biocontrol agent that can be referred to as Fictibacillus species is a spore-forming genus from the family Bacillaceae and includes some species that produce toxic compounds against root-knot nematodes causing infectious disease of crops and make economic losses [205].
Sporolactobacillus belonging to the family Sporolactobacillacae is known as a homofermentative genus for the production of D-lactic acid. This kind of acid is the precursor of polylactic acid (PLA). The usage of PLA instead of petroleum-derived plastics can decrease synthetic and hazardous materials causing destructive environmental problems. Nowadays, scientists are optimistic about replacing eco-friendly biomaterials with synthetic ones. Therefore, it seems that finding natural and renewable resources for this purpose is certainly significant [206,207]. Another species for a novel biomolecule production is Mechercharimyces asporophorigenens YM11-542 from the family Thermoactinomycetaceae, which is a mesophilic spore-forming species isolated from the marine environment and can produce a cytotoxic thiopeptide anticancer named urukthapelstatin A. This biomolecule has an IC50 value of 12 nM for A549 lung cancer cells [208]. Finding new species and genera from marine sources with very specific abilities reveals a robust metabolic diversity among these microorganisms that may not be found among terrestrial ones. Thermophilic genera of this family, like Thermoactinomyces, include species with high enzymatic activities, but Thermoactinomyces vulgaris has been considered a causative species of farmer’s lung disorder in addition to Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula [209]. Therefore, it is a critical issue to assure about the non-pathogenicity of a strain when applied for industrial and biotechnological goals. Moreover, it should be mentioned that some of the non-spore-forming genera belong to spore-forming families. One example is the genus Kurthia assigned to Caryophanaceae, a spore-forming family, which can degrade organic compounds and produce extremozymes like proteases [210,211].

5. Halophilic Genera of Bacillales

Halophiles are referred to as a group of organisms that love salt for their growth and habitation. They usually live in hyper-saline environments, including saline lakes, salterns, saline soils, or saline foods. Most of them belong to the Archaea domain, but there are many bacterial genera and some algae, as well as protozoa, with this property [212]. Generally, bacterial strains are almost moderate or slight halophiles; the members of Bacillales, such as Halobacillus, Salibacillus, and some species of the genus Bacillus, are no exception [213]. The main problem of halophiles is intracellular dehydration due to high extracellular salt concentrations. To become accustomed to these conditions, they accumulate inorganic ions such as sodium, potassium, and chlorine. This strategy does not allow losing water by the cell. However, under these conditions, cellular proteins should expose to acidic surfaces to interact with inorganic ions and be stabilized. Another advantageous method for coping with cytoplasm desiccation in halophiles is related to the polar organic osmolytes such as trehalose, proline, glycerol, glutamate, and glycine-betaine [214].

Potential and Industrial Applications

In traditional biotechnology, we use stainless steel reactors, intricate sterilization processes, expensive up and downstream processing, a high amount of freshwater, and skilled labor that increase costs and capital investments. They caused the bioproducts not to compete with equivalent chemical products based on petroleum. The main reason for the exorbitant costs is related to overcoming the contamination of bioproducts and bio-producers. To confront these issues, biotechnologists try to conduct bioprocesses under open (unsterile) and continuous conditions. Meanwhile, resistant microorganisms are the main part of this procedure [215]. Based on the halophilic property and other special abilities, Halobacillus and some species of the genus Bacillus, Lentibacillus, Salimicrobium, Planococcus, or Virgibacillus are appropriate candidates for industrial applications. These halophilic genera can produce extremozymes and biodiesels, ferment salty foods, and degrade pollutant compounds in saline environments [216,217,218,219]. Moreover, Gracilibacillus, a halotolerant genus, seems applicable as it can produce extremozymes [220,221]. Among halophilic genera, there are many types of research focused on Halobacillus because its species are virtuous sources for the production of glycine betaine compatible solute, Cl-1 biosensor, halo-stable serine proteinases, amylases, bioflocculants, antifungal cyclopeptides, etc. [221,222,223,224]. Moreover, it has been reported Halobacillus trueperi and two species of Marinococcus precipitate carbonates as calcites at different salinities. This process may play a significant role in the biomineralization of carbonates [225,226]. In addition, Marinococcus, which is a moderately halophilic and non-spore-forming genus of the family Bacillaceae, has been considered for the commercial production of ectoine [227]. Rummeliibacillus stabekisii, a halotolerant species from the family Caryophanaceae, shows biomineralization activity like H. trueperi [228]. Recent research indicates that the halophilic enzymes can be practical for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels. In this process, laccases have a key role as they are responsible for the delignification and detoxification of phenolic compounds interfering next steps (cellulose digestibility and extraction) of biofuel production. However, this treatment has very harsh conditions, and using a highly stable laccase is a great help to have a green operation. It would decrease the usage of synthetic surfactants and organic solvents. Furthermore, halozymes are very selective, particularly in the presence of ionic materials. Thus, using halophilic laccases can be a suitable candidate for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic materials. One of these halophilic bacteria is Aquisalibacillus elongatus from the family Bacillaceae, which produces a very resistant laccase. Furthermore, it can produce a bioactive pigment with biomedical and food industry potentials [221,229,230,231].

6. Thermophilic and Psychrophilic Genera of Bacillales

Temperature is a significant environmental factor that affects life. Heat and cold-adapted microorganisms are called thermophiles and psychrophiles, respectively. Interestingly, thermophiles were the first extremophiles researchers focused on and studied in detail. Afterward, other extremophiles were discovered and attracted great attention [214,215]. Psychrobacillus and Geobacillus from Caryophanaceae and Bacillaceae families are important psychrophilic and thermophilic genera, respectively, which can be applied in various fields [214,232].

Industrial Applications

Both thermo- and psychrophilic bacteria can produce extracellular enzymes that hydrolyze various compounds and are considered as a frontline in advanced biotechnological industries. Psychrophiles are obviously selected for the degradation of the polymeric contaminants at low temperatures with minimum energy usage. There are applicable cold-active enzymes such as malate dehydrogenase, lipase, iso-merase, xylanase, chitinase, and citrate synthase, while protease is considered an imperative group among them [233]. Recent progress in thermophilic bacteria provides fascinating results, making them substitutes for serving in contaminant-free processes. Furthermore, they are habitually resistant to other extreme conditions, such as low or high pH, organic solvents, and chemical agents. Additionally, they can produce a wide range of thermostable enzymes [215,233,234]. Moreover, thermophiles are related to microbial fuel cells containing anodic biofilm-forming communities with the ability of electrons to transfer to the solid phase to produce electricity. Recently, culture-based and unculturable methods demonstrated the presence of some members of the order Bacillales, such as Geobacillus, in these communities [235].
Geobacillus can be categorized as a polyextremophilic genus because of its resistance to many severe environmental factors. This endospore-forming genus belongs to the family Bacillaceae and includes 12 validly published genera with correct names that have impressive abilities [2]. They can utilize various substrates such as hydrocarbons as carbon and energy sources that can be useful for the bioremediation of oil spots in the environment. Furthermore, this genus can produce several enzymes, such as thermostable amylases, xylanases, cellulases, lipases, proteases, and endonucleases, including extraordinary commercial applications. The genus Geobacillus has diverse metabolic pathways that result in the production of bacteriocins, ethanol as biofuel, and many other secondary metabolites [236,237]. However, it should not be neglected that some species of this genus, such as Geobacillus stearothermophilus, are among the main causes of decomposition in milk or canned foods, although no infectious disease has been reported [2]. A similar thermophilic genus to Geobacillus has been described recently and named Parageobacillus. It was shown that Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius can be a suitable potent species for the production of biohydrogen via utilizing CO, whereas its final yield is 1.08 H2/CO [238].
Thermotolerant and thermophilic genera of the families Paenbacillaceae, Sporolactobacillaceae, and Thermoacinomycetaceae have shown substantial abilities to be used in advanced biotechnology such as Cohnella with the capability of nitrogen fixation and the production of thermostable degrading enzymes, e.g., xylanase, chitinase, and agarase. [239,240]. Thermobacillus is another example of the family Paenibacillaceae that can produce thermostable enzymes with a high hemicellulolytic activity which, in turn, may be used in the production of second-generation biofuels [241]. Various researchers have highlighted xylanases’ role in the production of biofuels from renewable resources. However, another notable enzyme, xylulokinase, which is essential for the metabolizing of the liberated D-xylose, has not been studied in thermophilic microorganisms in detail. This enzyme has been found in a thermophilic species of Bacillaceae named Saccharococcus caldoxylosilyticus (now Parageobacillus caldoxylosilyticus) strain S1812, and despite previously described xylulokinases, it is not inducible by xylose. Therefore, the routine process of biofuel production can be changed to achieve a higher yield [242]. In addition to the mentioned genera, Thermoflavimicrobium, a thermophilic genus of the family Thermoactinomycetaceae, attracted researchers’ interest due to its capability to produce a novel and useful iso-merase for the commercial production of D-mannose [243]. Moreover, Novibacillus thermophilus, belonging to this family, is a proper candidate for the bioremediation of hot wastewaters containing azo dyes [244,245].
It seems that most psychrophilic genera within the order Bacillales belong to the family Caryophanaceae. Although psychrophiles and psychrotolerants distribute among all families of this order, they do not form a distinctive group. It is noteworthy to say that little information about biotechnological and industrial applications of Bacillales psychrotolerants and psychrophiles has been mentioned up to now. The investigation and exploration of these fascinating bacteria continue to clarify more details on how to apply them for various purposes. Recently, a psychrotolerant and spore-forming genus, Sporosarcina, has been used for microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) [246,247,248]. In addition to the psychrophilic genera of the family Caryophanaceae, Ureibacillus is a thermophilic genus assigned to this family. This genus has seemingly presumable applications for biofuels, enzymes, and nanoparticle production [249,250,251].

7. Extremophiles and Polyextremophilic Genera of Bacillales

Extremophiles are organisms able to survive under hostile environmental conditions such as different acidity, temperature, salts, and heavy metals. Polyextremophilic property refers to extremophiles that can withstand more than one intense state, such as thermoacidophiles living in acidic hot springs or halophiles living in low-oxygen areas. Studying these microorganisms provides a lot of information to understand how to use them for various applications. One of these attractive fields relates to astrobiology, exploring the possibility of life in the solar system [214]. In the order Bacillales, some genera can be called extremophiles and polyextremophiles, but it is not possible to create an exact boundary to define them as extremophile or polyextremophile. Due to the importance of halophilic, thermophilic, and psychrophilic genera, we considered them in the previous sections. Here, we discussed other extremophiles and polyextremophiles of the order Bacillales. A list of (poly)extremophilic genera of this order has been shown in the Supplementary Data, Table S3.

7.1. Acidophilic Genera and Their Applications

Acidophiles can grow under high acidity (pH less than 3). Even though many bacterial strains grow in the range of neutral pH, they can grow at the lower pH range (acidotolerants). Acidophiles use several cellular strategies to confine the influx of H+. One of these strategies is to decrease cell membrane permeability to adjust intracellular pH. In addition, they have a metabolic preference for the oxidation of compounds producing H2 instead of H+ and can respond to slight acidification by cytoplasm buffering. Therefore, acidophiles and their products have extraordinary properties making them remarkably used in advanced industries applying low pH conditions in their processes. Moreover, these conditions prepare an unfavorable environment for the contaminant microorganisms [214,215]. It should be considered that all acidophiles are not necessarily useful for the industry e. g., Alicyclobacillus is a spoilage agent of fruit juices [179]. In the order Bacillales, most genera grow under neutrophilic conditions, but moderately acidophiles are widespread in different families. Alicyclobacillus is the most known acidophilic genus in this order. Kyrpidia and Hydrogenibacillus are moderately acidophilic genera that belong to Alicyclobacillaceae and Bacillaceae, respectively; however, it is possible to find only one strain that can grow under low pH conditions [2,252].
Interestingly, most extremophiles can tolerate other harsh conditions, such as high temperatures. Alicycobacillus or Kyrpidia are thermophilic genera with the capability to tolerate low pH. Kyrpidia is a thermoacidophilic genus that grows on CO and CO2 as sole carbon sources using H2 as the electron donor [253,254]. Recently, it has been reported Kyrpidia spormannii FAVT5 showed a high affinity to H2, which is an exception in the phylum Firmicutes [214]. Moreover, this species has been used as a novel biocatalyst in the electrosynthesis processes [255].

7.2. Alkaliphilic Genera

In contrast to acidophiles, microorganisms living in alkaline conditions (more than pH 9) are called alkaliphiles. Furthermore, some microorganisms can tolerate such low acidity and group as alkalitolerants. Alkaliphiles can be found in alkalithermal waters, soda lakes, or shallow hydrothermal vents. They need to increase the H+ influx to drive the power plant of the cell (ATP synthesis) and neutralize the cytoplasmic area. For this purpose, they use sodium or potassium-proton anti-porters to transport monovalent cations out and proton in, respectively. Furthermore, the acidic composition of the cell wall and buffering state of the cytoplasm can help keep them alive under alkaline conditions. Because of the astonishing properties of alkaline lovers, they are very promising candidates for the biorefining of polymeric carbohydrates (cellulose or hemicellulose) [42,214,215].
Amphibacillus is a facultative anaerobic spore-forming genus belonging to the family Bacillaceae and can grow under alkaline conditions (pH 8–10) [256]. This genus consists of eight validly published species with correct names. Some strains of Amphibacillus have the opportunity to consider as applicable strains, such as Amphibacillus sp. strain C40, isolated from an old indigo fermentation liquor that reduces this dye during its fermentation process [257]. Moreover, this dye is reduced by Fermentibacillus polygoni, a moderately alkalophilic spore-forming genus of the family Bacillaceae [258]. Another strain of Amphibacillus sp. can synthesize PHA polymers from ammonium-rich wastes, which are an important issue nowadays for resource recovery [259]. Strain KSUCr3 of this genus is confirmed as a heavy metal-reducing bacterium under extreme alkaline conditions. It is very tolerant to the high concentration of chromium, nickel, molybdenum, cobalt, manganese, zinc, copper, and lead and reduces them rapidly. Hence, it could be an efficient detoxifier of heavy metals existing in dangerous wastes. For example, this strain reduces 237 μMh−1 of Cr (VI) continuously under optimum conditions. It is one of the most rapid rates among other microorganisms [260]. Furthermore, this genus is a reliable source for the extremozymes such as glucoamylopullulanse produced by strain NM-Ra2. This kind of amylase has distinct amylolytic activity under high pH and temperature. Moreover, it has considerable stability in organic solvents, metallic ions, and high salt concentrations. Moreover, it can act on a wide range of substrates. These critical properties are very important that make this strain suitable to be used in the starch industry [261].

7.3. Polyextremophilic Genera

Being able to face several harsh conditions simultaneously does not seem to be simple, but polyextremophiles manage their life by using survival strategies and synergistic adaptations to cope with the problems. This ability makes them more applicable in various industries. For example, thermoacidophiles can be used for lignocellulosic hydrolysis and biofuel production. Moreover, studying these microorganisms can reveal the fundamental points used for extraterrestrial life simulation by astrobiologists. Based on factors that polyextremophiles tolerate, they can be sorted into many groups: 1, a combination of pH and temperature; 2, salinity and temperature; 3, pressure and temperature; 4, radiation and temperature; 5, pH and salinity; 6, pH and pressure; 7, pH and radiation; 8, salinity and pressure; 9, desiccation and radiation; 10, temperature, desiccation, and pressure; and 11, pH, salinity and desiccation [214,262]. This classification helps us discuss polyextremophilic genera of the order Bacillales without any confusion. However, it should be considered that some groups may not have proper examples within this order.
Depending on industrial demands, different types of polyextremophiles and their products can be selected. Therefore, using wide-spectrum strains improves their functionality in each field they have been used. One of the first interesting genera discussed here is Exiguobacterium, a versatile member of the order Bacillales whose parent taxon is Bacillaceae. This pigmented, non-spore-forming bacterium can grow under very diverse environmental conditions. It is possible to isolate its strains from various places, including soils, glaciers, seawaters, sediments, hydrothermal vents, and forests. Exiguobacterium strains have been applied to produce resistant hydrolyzing enzymes such as xylanase, cellulase, tannase, or mannanase, which are involved in the biofuel production processes. Other extremozymes like lipases, amylases, and proteases have been reported among these strains. Furthermore, this genus is cable of remediating and degrading heavy metals, dyes, aromatic as well as volatile hydrocarbons. Likewise, some strains of this genus can promote plant growth via the production of indole acetic acid, siderophores, and hydrogen cyanide [263,264].
The next genus is a knallgas (hydrogen oxidizing) bacterium classified as Bacillus due to low chemotaxonomic and whole-genome information; however, it is currently identified as Kyrpidia, a spore-forming thermoacidophile isolated from sulfataric areas and includes only two species, Kyrpidia tusciae, and Kyrpidia spormannii [254]. These species can grow autotrophically and heterotrophically. K. tusciae can utilize 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid as the sole source of carbon and energy at 55 °C, associated with B12-dependent mutase activity. This kind of mutase, due to its high specificity, has the potential to be used for the synthesis of stereospecific carboxylic acids such as poly (methyl methacrylate) from renewable sources not easily achievable by routine chemical reactions [265].
Among the thermophilic genera, Aeribacillus has merely two species, Aeribacillus pallidus and Aeribacillus composti. A. pallidus has remarkably attracted the interest of researchers because of its polyextremophilic characteristics. In general, this species is an alkali- and halotolerant spore former thermophile that can produce exopolysaccharides (EPSs) [266,267]. Although the production of thermophilic EPSs is not a cost-effective process, the produced EPSs have many advantages, including metal adsorption, short fermentation time due to high growth rates, highly thermo-resistant, and stability in the water/oil emulsions. These properties make it a suitable substitute for chemical stabilizers and emulsifiers in the cosmetic and food industries. For example, A. pallidus YM-1 and 418 can produce stable EPSs with promising usages as gelling agents, thickeners, suspenders, or coagulants due to their composition, molecular weight, and structural properties [268,269,270]. Another considerable application of Aeribacillus is related to thermostable antibacterial peptide production as a preservative agent in foods undergoing thermal processing. Moreover, this potential ability has been reported among other thermophilic genera like Anoxybacillus and Geobacillus [271]. The halotolerant strain TD1 of the genus Aeribacillus is a probable candidate for the industrial production of thermostable pectate transeliminase (pectate lyase) applied as an extractive agent of wine or fruit juices, softener of vegetables, scrubbing agent of cotton, animal feed, pretreating agent of pectinaceous wastes, etc. [272].
Strain TSHB1 of A. pallidus is another suitable example of the carbonic anhydrase production used as a catalyst for CO2 sequestration. This applicability should be considered to be a cost-effective method for this process [273]. Lastly, researchers have indicated that the genus Aeribacillus is reclassified from Bacillus and Geobacillus and forms a new taxon. It is a potentially suitable microorganism that can degrade n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [274,275]. Moreover, it can produce thermozymes such as serine alkaline protease [276,277], xylanase [278], 4-α-glucanotransferase [279], and Cr (IV) reductase [280]. Bacillus haloalkaliphilus, another interesting polyextremophile, was reclassified as a newly proposed genus in 2005. Alkalibacillus is known as a spore-forming halo- and alkaliphilic genus with a wide range of biotechnological applications, particularly ectoine and extremozyme production [281,282]. These extremozymes include alkali-thermostable proteases and organo-solvent resistant lipases with potential usages in laundry and leather processing, while ectoine can be used in the cosmetic industry and molecular biology as a stabilizer [283]. Moreover, the genus Anoxybacillus is an alkalophilic thermophile that has been considered a relatively new source of extremozymes. These enzymes can be used in various fields such as resource recovery of lignocellulosic materials, starch industry, bioremediation of organic compounds, biosorption of heavy metals, biohydrogen production as renewable energy, and production of bioactive compounds [284]. Comprehensively, biohydrogen-producing members phylogenetically are closer to the genus Clostridium and use the formate hydrogen lyase (FHL) pathway for this purpose. In comparison to Clostridium, H2-producing members of the order Bacillales are less susceptible to oxygen and more resistant to heat-shock treatment. Furthermore, they have a versatile metabolic capacity making them utilize a wide variety of substrates and are resistant to extreme pH values and salts [285].
Within the family Bacillaceae, Anaerobacillus, an anaerobic spore-forming genus with tolerance to high pH values and high salt concentrations, attracted the scientists’ interest due to its ability for bioremediation of environments contaminated by oxyanions of selenium and arsenic. Anaerobacillus arseniciselenatis, isolated from the alkaliphilic lake, can reduce arsenate (As (V)) to arsenite (As (III)) while oxidizing lactate to carbon dioxide and acetate. Moreover, it can reduce selenate (Se (VI)) to selenite. Therefore, using the co-culture of A. arseniciselenatis and Bacillus selenitireducens (now Salisediminibacterium selenitireducens) which reduce selenite (Se (IV)) to selenium (Se (0)), can help to convert selenate to elemental selenium [286].
Furthermore, the genus Lysinibacillus is a significant and resistant one used for the bioremediation of heavy metals such as arsenic, selenium, and cadmium. Haloalkalitolerant Lysinibacillus can utilize hydrocarbons, and also its species can produce antifungal biomaterials, biosurfactants, and Bt-like endotoxins [287,288,289]. Although the family Staphylococcaceae has been known for MRSA, Nosocomiicoccus, and some virulent species of Macrococcus, it includes non-pathogenic polyextremophilic genera such as Salinicoccus, Abyssicoccus, and some halotolerant genera like Jeotgalicoccus that are interesting for biotechnological applications [229,290,291]. Fascinatingly, the genus Macrococcus includes some species with potential industrial applications, like Macrococcus bovicus, which is able to produce silver nanoparticles, or M. caseolyticus, which is related to the development of flavor in fermented foods [292,293]. In addition to the genera discussed here, there are many other polyextremophilic genera in the order Bacillales with exceptional properties that may make them applicable in the future (Table 3).

8. Engineered Strains of Bacillales

One of the most striking microorganisms from the order Bacillales is B. subtilis known as GRAS [313]. The production of many different metabolites (organic acids, chemicals, biosurfactants, antibiotics, peptides etc.) has been greatly improved by developing various bioengineered applications (heterologous gene expression, inducible promoter introduction, gene deletion, and transcriptional regulation) in Bacillus strains [313,314,315,316,317].
At the core of bioengineering studies, researchers have focused on increasing the activity of microbial strains for efficient and simultaneous use of different types of sugars (glucose, xylose, and arabinose) from lignocellulosic materials [318]. The xylA and xylB genes encode xylose iso-merase and xylose kinase, respectively, and these genes are regulated by xylR (xylose-responsive repressor protein) and carbon catabolite repression in B.subtilis [319,320]. However, it was determined that xylose could be transported to the cell via araE gene (xylose/arabinose transporter gene) when arabinose is present in the medium, but wild-type B. subtilis strain could not consume xylose in media containing only xylose [321]. Thus, the araE expression cassette was constructed and then integrated into B. subtilis, allowing xylose to be used even in only xylose-containing media [322]. With the effective use of xylose, some chemicals such as acetoin, poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA), and biofuels have been effectively produced from different sugar-containing substrates such as glucose, xylose, and arabinose [323,324,325,326,327].
Bacillus has a robust expression system frequently used in the production of polymers such as γ-PGA and polyhydroxyalkanoate since their strains do not contain lipopolysaccharides [328]. γ-PGA is a water-soluble polymer consisting of D- and L-glutamic acid monomers, known as non-toxic, edible, and biodegradable [329]. This polymer is generally synthesized in the presence of glycerol, citrate, and glutamic acid. On the other hand, Halmschlag et al. [330] developed two bacterial strains that can produce γ-PGA by consuming glucose. For this, the natural promoter of the PGA synthetase operon was replaced with the strong constitutive promoter Pveg or the xylose-inducible promoter Pxyl. 129% more γ-PGA production was achieved in glucose medium by bioengineered B. subtilis strain [330]. In another study of γ-PGA production, Cai et al. [331] focused on improving ATP supply in engineered strains of B. licheniformis. The deletion of cydB (cytochrome bd ubiquinol oxidase (subunit II)) and cydC (ATP-binding/permease protein) and expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (VHb) improved ATP-synthetic and nitrate metabolism pathways, enhancing the ATP supply and γ-PGA yield [331]. Expression of bacterial hemoglobin (VHb) in heterologous hosts improves oxygen supply to cells and thus improves growth, production of value-added metabolites, and ability to degrade organic compounds [198,332]. Similarly, VHb expression could improve surfactin biosynthesis in B. subtilis [333]. Surfactin production was also reported to be increased 6.4-fold by overexpressing the signaling factors encoded by comX and phrC [334]. The production of hydroxybutyrate, another important biopolymer, can also be increased by metabolic engineering. Akdoğan and Çelik [335] developed a bioprocess using a recombinant P. megaterium strain overexpressing the native phaC gene (PHA synthase) for excess Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) production from glucose without the addition of any precursors. Cal et al. [328] also inserted three genes (4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA transferase (orfZ), succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (sucD), and 4-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (4hbD)) for succinate utilization from Clostridium kluyveri into P. megaterium under the control of xylA promoter, and thus succeeded in more effectively producing (>10% mol) PHBV copolymer from succinate.
Additionally, the production of 2,3-butanediol is a common metabolite in Bacillus strains. Researchers have focused on more efficient production of this compound by synthesizing its production in the early logarithmic phase rather than the late logarithmic and stationary phase, depending on the expression of bdhA gene (acetoin reductase) [336,337]. Qiu et al. [338] developed an engineered B. licheniformis strain to produce the high titters of meso-2,3-butanediol. The strain can normally produce a mixture of D-2,3-butanediol and meso-2,3-butanediol isomers. To eliminate the production of D-2,3-butanediol, two genes, which are glycerol dehydrogenase (gdh) and acetoin dehydrogenase (acoR), were deleted from wild-type strain to provide adequate flux from acetoin toward meso-2,3-butanediol. Thus, meso-2,3-butanediol was improved by 50% through a double-deletion mutant [338]. Fu et al. [339] also deleted some genes in the metabolite pathways for pure meso-2,3-butanediol production and then cloned the budC gene from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Thus, an industrial butanediol producer, B. subtilis, was developed by replacing bdhA in B. subtilis with budC from K. pneumonia [339]. Moreover, Drejer et al. [340] developed a bioengineered strain of Bacillus methanolicus to produce acetoin from methanol. For the industrial strain, three different heterologous alsSD/budAB operons encoding acetolactate synthase and acetolactate decarboxylase were expressed under the control of an inducible promoter. Moreover, overexpression of malic enzyme (mae from G. stearothermophilus) with isocitrate lyase gene (from B. methanolicus) increased acetoin titers by 1.6-fold [340]. Bioalcohol (ethanol, isobutanol, and methylbutanols) production capabilities of Bacillus species can be improved by the inactivation of the RelA regulatory protein by additional lysine and cysteine supplementation [341].
Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan or HA) is a sulfate-free glycosaminoglycan generally produced by highly pathogenic Streptococcus species and is mostly used in various industries such as cosmetics, food, and pharmaceuticals [342]. Relevant genes from Streptococcus were transferred to GRAS microorganisms such as Bacillus for bio-safe production of hyaluronic acid [343,344,345,346,347]. Chien and Lee [346] developed a mutant B. subtilis strain by integrating hyaluronic acid production-related genes (hasA and hasB) from Streptococcus into B. subtilis or integrating B. subtilis itself (tauD) into the amyE locus. While HA production can only be achieved by expression of the hasA gene, the production was better through the co-expression of hasA with hasB and tauD. In addition, the expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin could also increase both cell density and metabolite production [346]. On the other hand, Jin et al. [348] increased the hyaluronan production from 1.01 g/L to 3.16 g/L through overexpression of some committed genes (tuaD, gtaB, glmU, glmM, and glmS) and down-regulating the glycolytic pathway. Similarly, mannan production was improved through overexpression of identified committed genes (manC, manB, manA and pgi) in B. subtilis [349]. On the other hand, different kinds of polysaccharides such as chondroitin and heparosan could be produced by bioengineered B. subtilis via integrating related synthases genes derived from E. coli and overexpressing tuaD in B. subtilis [350].
B. thuringiensis is the most widely used microorganism for commercial biopesticide production [351,352]. Bioengineering studies are also carried out in order to promote sporulation and toxin production and/or to produce a broader spectrum insecticide of B. thuringiensis [351,353,354]. For example, an engineered strain with a broader spectrum of activity against two different insects was developed by incorporating cryIC gene (its products are active against Spodoptera littoralis) in B. thuringiensis (active against Ostrinia nubilalis) [353]. Similarly, Yan et al. [354] developed a recombinant B. thuringiensis strain by introducing the recombinant plasmid pSTK-3A containing cry3Aa7 into the wild-type B. thuringiensis strain containing the cry8Ca2 gene. On the other hand, Lertcanawanichakul et al. [355] cloned chitinase genes from Aeromonas hydrophila and N. circulans into B. thuringiensis and obtained 15 times higher chitinase activity. For the products of B. thuringiensis to become more toxic, the integration of various genes into bacteria or overexpression of certain genes can be carried out [356,357,358]. Yu et al. [357] integrated two genes, cyt1Aa and cry11Aa, into B. thuringiensis in order to obtain a more toxic product. Doruk et al. [358], on the other hand, increased insecticide production by overexpressing the polyphosphate kinase gene.

9. Conclusions and Perspectives

The order Bacillales includes 10 validly published families with 218 validly and non-validly published assigned genera that show high physiologic, metabolic, and genetic diversity. Their ecological habitats vary from glaciers to hydrothermal vents, and some of them cannot live without a host. Although recognized pathogenic genera, Staphylococcus and Listeria, belong to this order, most of the genera within Bacillales have been considered as biotechnological resources that can be implicated in several fields, including food and pharmaceutical industries, agriculture, bioremediation of contaminated sites, molecular biology, and medicine. One of the main genera with high capacity and efficacy is Bacillus. Species of this two-edged genus can be grouped into pathogenic (B. cereus group) and soil (B. subtilis group) groups. The latter group encompasses more important industrial strains which display outstanding abilities.
For better understanding, in this review, Bacillales genera on the basis of their extremophilicity have been grouped into spore-forming, halophilic, thermophilic, psychrophilic, acidophilic, alkaliphilic and polyextremophilic genera. Like the Bacillus genus, every group exhibits more than one property that can be biotechnologically significant and preserve their position as dominant genera in industries. In addition to Bacillus, some genera like Pullulanibacillus have been confirmed to be used for the production of enzymes, antimicrobial agents, biopolymers, fermented foods, etc. However, as indicated in this review, so many species of the order Bacillales are potent resources for providing green industries in the future. One of the reasons that limited the use of these potent strains is related to a lack of knowledge about their physiology and metabolic activities. In addition, some of them are assigned to recently identified genera or families, and therefore, it takes time to make them ready for industrial applications, and future efforts should be on the screening of biotechnological abilities of less-known genera with high resistance to harsh conditions. Moreover, another focus should be dedicated to complete genome technology and metabolomics to discover the adaptation mechanisms used by Bacillales genera.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10122355/s1, Table S1: Spore-forming genera of the order Bacillales; Table S2: The allocated genera to the family Bacillaceae; Table S3: list of (poly)extremophilic genera in the order Bacillales. References [20,22,26,256,258,295,297,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433,434,435,436,437,438,439,440,441,442,443,444,445,446,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,460,461,462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497,498,499,500,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,530] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H., T.S. and M.J.T.; validation, S.H., T.S., M.R., H.A., Z.E., S.A.N., F.Y., M.K.A. and M.J.T.; investigation, Z.E. and M.K.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H., T.S., M.R., H.A., Z.E., S.A.N., F.Y., M.K.A. and M.J.T.; writing—review and editing, M.J.T.; visualization, S.H., T.S., Z.E., M.K.A. and M.J.T.; supervision, M.J.T.; project administration, M.J.T.; funding acquisition, M.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (Tillväxtverket) (Grant number: 20201656) through a European Regional Development Fund.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would also like to show our gratitude to Radhey S. Gupta (McMaster University, Canada) and Peter Kämpfer (Giessen University, Germany) for their critical comments on the taxonomy of the order Bacillales.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tindall, B.J. Names at the rank of class, subclass and order, their typification and current status: Supplementary information to Opinion 79. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3599–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Vos, P.; Garrity, G.M.; Jones, D.; Krieg, N.R.; Ludwig, W.; Rainey, F.A.; Schleifer, K.; Whitman, W.B. (Eds.) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 3: The Firmicutes; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mandic-Mulec, I.; Stefanic, P.; van Elsas, J.D. Ecology of Bacillaceae. Microbiol. Spectrum. 2015, 3, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gherardi, G.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Savini, V. Chapter 1-Staphylococcal Taxonomy, in Pet-To-Man Travelling Staphylococci; Savini, V., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  5. Little, S.F.; Ivins, B.E. Molecular pathogenesis of Bacillus anthracis infection. Microbes Infect. 1999, 1, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Lereclus, D.; Koehler, T.M. The Bacillus cereus Group: Bacillus Species with Pathogenic Potential. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hansen, L.H.; Planellas, M.H.; Long, K.S.; Vester, B. The Order Bacillales Hosts Functional Homologs of the Worrisome cfr Antibiotic Resistance Gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3563–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Madigan, M.; Bender, K.; Buckley, D.; Sattley, W.; Stahl, D. Brock Biology of Microorganisms; Pearson: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ludwig, W.; Schleifer, K.-H.; Whitman, W.B. Revised road map to the phylum Firmicutes. Bergey’s Man. Syst. Bacteriol. 2009, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brenner, D.J.; Krieg, N.R.; Staley, J.T. Appendix 2. Taxonomic outline of the Archaea and Bacteria. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed.; Garrity, G.M., Staley, J.T., Boone, D.R., Brenner, D.J., Vos, P.D., Goodfellow, M., Krieg, N.R., Rainey, F.A., Schleifer, K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 207–220. [Google Scholar]
  11. Skerman, V.B.D.; McGowan, V.; Sneath, P.H.A. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1980, 30, 225–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Parker, C.T.; Tindall, B.J.; Garrity, G.M. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, S1–S111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tindall, B.J. When treated as heterotypic synonyms the names Caryophanaceae Peshkoff 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) and Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) have priority over the names Planococcaceae Krasil’nikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980) and Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980) and Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980), respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 2187–2195. [Google Scholar]
  14. NamesforLife Bacterial and Archaeal Nomenclature. Available online: https://www.namesforlife.com/search (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  15. Vandamme, P.; Pot, B.; Gillis, M.; de Vos, P.; Kersters, K.; Swings, J. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60, 407–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Maayer, P.; Aliyu, H.; Cowan, D.A. Reorganising the order Bacillales through phylogenomics. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 42, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fritze, D. Taxonomy of the Genus Bacillus and Related Genera: The Aerobic Endospore-Forming Bacteria. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 1245–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yoon, J.H.; Kang, S.S.; Lee, K.C.; Lee, E.S.; Kho, Y.H.; Kang, K.H.; Park, Y.H. Planomicrobium koreense gen. nov., sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the Korean traditional fermented seafood jeotgal, and transfer of Planococcus okeanokoites (Nakagawa et al. 1996) and Planococcus mcmeekinii (Junge et al. 1998) to the genus Planomicrobium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 1511–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yarza, P.; Ludwig, W.; Euzéby, J.; Amann, R.; Schleifer, K.-H.; Glöckner, F.O.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Update of the All-Species Living Tree Project based on 16S and 23S rRNA sequence analyses. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gupta, R.S.; Patel, S. Robust Demarcation of the Family Caryophanaceae (Planococcaceae) and Its Different Genera Including Three Novel Genera Based on Phylogenomics and Highly Specific Molecular Signatures. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Maughan, H.; van der Auwera, G. Bacillus taxonomy in the genomic era finds phenotypes to be essential though often misleading. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Patel, S.; Gupta, R.S. A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: Proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 406–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gaballa, A.; Cheng, R.A.; Trmcic, A.; Kovac, J.; Kent, D.J.; Martin, N.H.; Wiedmann, M. Development of a database and standardized approach for rpoB sequence-based subtyping and identification of aerobic spore-forming Bacillales. J. Microbiol. Methods 2021, 191, 106350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Parks, D.H.; Chuvochina, M.; Waite, D.W.; Rinke, C.; Skarshewski, A.; Chaumeil, P.-A.; Hugenholtz, P. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Whitman, W.B. Genome sequences as the type material for taxonomic descriptions of prokaryotes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gupta, R.S.; Patel, S.; Saini, N.; Chen, S. Robust Demarcation of 17 Distinct Bacillus Species Clades, Proposed as Novel Bacillaceae Genera, by Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomic Analyses: Description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis Sp. Nov. And Proposal for an Emended Genus Bacillus Limiting It Only to the Members of the Subtilis and Cereus Clades of Species. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5753–5798. [Google Scholar]
  27. Parte, A.C.; Carbasse, J.S.; Meier-Kolthoff, j.; Reimer, L.C.; Göker, M. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (Lpsn) Moves to the Dsmz. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5607–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tille, P.M. Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Harwood, C.R. Bacillus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Driks, A.; Eichenberger, P. The Bacterial Spore: From Molecules to Systems; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Logan, N.A.; Berge, O.; Bishop, A.H.; Busse, H.-J.; de Vos, P.; Fritze, D.; Heyndrickx, M.; Kämpfer, P.; Rabinovitch, L.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S.; et al. Proposed Minimal Standards for Describing New Taxa of Aerobic, Endospore-Forming Bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2114–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Helgason, E.; Tourasse, N.J.; Meisal, R.; Caugant, D.A.; Kolstø, A. Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for Bacteria of the Bacillus Cereus Group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adelskov, J.; Patel, B.K.C. A molecular phylogenetic framework for Bacillus subtilis using genome sequences and its application to Bacillus subtilis subspecies stecoris strain D7XPN1, an isolate from a commercial food-waste degrading bioreactor. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jolley, K.A.; Maiden, M.C. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Conrad, A.I. Applications and Systematics of Bacillus and Relatives. Based on a meeting held in Bruges, Belgium, August 2000. Edited by Roger Berkeley, Marc Heyndrickx, Niall Logan, and Paul De Vos. Q. Rev. Biol. 2003, 78, 229–230. [Google Scholar]
  36. Harwood, C.R.; Mouillon, J.-M.; Pohl, S.; Arnau, J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bhandari, V.; Ahmod, N.Z.; Shah, H.N.; Gupta, R.S. Molecular signatures for Bacillus species: Demarcation of the Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus clades in molecular terms and proposal to limit the placement of new species into the genus Bacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 2712–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Traag, B.A.; Pugliese, A.; Eisen, J.A.; Losick, R. Gene Conservation among Endospore-Forming Bacteria Reveals Additional Sporulation Genes in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Errington, J. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 1, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Satyanarayana, T.; Littlechild, J.; Kawarabayasi, Y. Thermophilic Microbes in Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology: Biotechnology of Thermophiles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pichinoty, F.; Asselineau, J.; Mandel, M. Biochemical characterization of Bacillus benzoevorans sp. nov., a new filamentous, sheathed mesophilic species, degrading various aromatic acids and phenols. Ann. De Microbiol. 1984, 135, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  42. Horikoshi, K. Alkaliphiles: Some applications of their products for biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ferguson, C.; Booth, N.; Allan, E. An ELISA for the detection of Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria confirms their symbiosis in strawberry. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sleytr, U.B.; Schuster, B.; Egelseer, E.-M.; Pum, D. S-layers: Principles and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 823–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, M.-Y.; Lövgren, A.; Landén, R.; Lögren, A. Adhesion and Cytotoxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis to Cultured Spodoptera and Drosophila Cells. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1995, 66, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barnaby, W. Plague Makers: The Secret World of Biological Warfare, 3rd ed.; Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Roffey, R.; Tegnell, A.; Elgh, F. Biological warfare in a historical perspective. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002, 8, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ali, S.Z.; Ali, G.M.; Nazir, F. Bacillus thuringiensis and its application in agriculture. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 2022–2031. [Google Scholar]
  49. Feitelson, J.S.; Payne, J.; Kim, L. Bacillus thuringiensis: Insects and Beyond. Nat. Biotechnol. 1992, 10, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manktelow, C.J.; White, H.; Crickmore, N.; Raymond, B. Divergence in environmental adaptation between terrestrial clades of the Bacillus cereus group. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 97, fiaa228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nicholson, W.L.; Munakata, N.; Horneck, G.; Melosh, H.J.; Setlow, P. Resistance of Bacillus Endospores to Extreme Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 548–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Piggot, P.J.; Hilbert, D.W. Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Qin, Y.; Angelini, L.L.; Chai, Y. Bacillus subtilis Cell Differentiation, Biofilm Formation and Environmental Prevalence. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Henriques, A.O.; Moran, J.C.P. Structure, Assembly, and Function of the Spore Surface Layers. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 555–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schallmey, M.; Singh, A.; Ward, O.P. Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chen, W.; Ma, R.; Lin, P.; Yuan, H.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, D.; Ma, Y.; Wang, T. Display of Glucose Oxidase on Bacillus subtilis Spore Surface and Its Application in Electrode. World 2022, 7, 34–47. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nath, S.C.; Dora, K.C. Application of Bacillus sp. as a biopreservative for food preservation. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015, 5, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mohan, G.; Thangappanpillai, A.K.T.; Ramasamy, B. Antimicrobial activities of secondary metabolites and phylogenetic study of sponge endosymbiotic bacteria, Bacillus sp. at Agatti Island, Lakshadweep Archipelago. Biotechnol. Rep. 2016, 11, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sansinenea, E.; Ortiz, A. Secondary metabolites of soil Bacillus spp. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 1523–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mohkam, M.; Nezafat, N.; Berenjian, A.; Negahdaripour, M.; Behfar, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Role of Bacillus Genus in the Production of Value-Added Compounds. In Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology; Islam, M.T., Rahman, M., Pandey, P., Jha, C.K., Aeron, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sar, T.; Harirchi, S.; Ramezani, M.; Bulkan, G.; Akbas, M.Y.; Pandey, A.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Potential utilization of dairy industries by-products and wastes through microbial processes: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Scawen, M.D.; Hammond, P.M.; Comer, M.J.; Atkinson, T. The application of triazine dye affinity chromatography to the large-scale purification of glycerokinase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Anal. Biochem. 1983, 132, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Goward, C.R.; Hartwell, R.; Atkinson, T.; Scawen, M.D. The purification and characterization of glucokinase from the thermophile Bacillus stearothermophilus. Biochem. J. 1986, 237, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hummel, W.; Kula, M.-R. Leucine dehydrogenase from Bacillus sphaericus. Optimized production conditions and an efficient method for its large-scale purification. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1981, 12, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, M.; Yang, T.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Rao, Z. Rational Engineering of Bacillus cereus Leucine Dehydrogenase Towards α-keto Acid Reduction for Improving Unnatural Amino Acid Production. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 14, e1800253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Areekit, S.; Kanjanavas, P.; Khawsak, P.; Pakpitchareon, A.; Potivejkul, K.; Chansiri, G.; Chansiri, K. Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of Thermotolerant Manganese Superoxide Dismutase from Bacillus sp. MHS47. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 844–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Itakorode, B.O.; Okonji, R.E.; Adedeji, O.; Torimiro, N.; Onwudiegwu, C.; Oluwaseyi, A. Studies on some physicochemical properties of Rhodanese synthesized by Bacillus cereus isolated from the effluents of iron and steel smelting industry. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2019, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  68. De Boer, A.S.; Priest, F.; Diderichsen, B. On the industrial use of Bacillus licheniformis: A review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 40, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. de Boer Sietske, A.; Diderichsen, B. On the safety of Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens: A review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 36, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. He, W.; Mu, W.; Jiang, B.; Yan, X.; Zhang, T. Construction of a Food Grade Recombinant Bacillus subtilis Based on Replicative Plasmids with an Auxotrophic Marker for Biotransformation of d-Fructose to d-Allulose. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3243–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ngalimat, M.; Yahaya, R.; Baharudin, M.; Yaminudin, S.; Karim, M.; Ahmad, S.; Sabri, S. A Review on the Biotechnological Applications of the Operational Group Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Priest, F.G.; Goodfellow, M.; Shute, L.A.; Berkeley, R.C.W. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1987, 37, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alagöz, D.; Yildirim, D.; Güvenmez, H.K.; Sihay, D.; Tükel, S.S. Covalent Immobilization and Characterization of a Novel Pullulanase from Fontibacillus sp. Strain DSHK 107 onto Florisil® and Nano-silica for Pullulan Hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 179, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials; Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF); Silano, V.; Bolognesi, C.; Castle, L.; Chipman, K.; Cravedi, J.P.; Fowler, P.; Franz, R.; Grob, K.; et al. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme pullulanase from Pullulanibacillus naganoensis strain AE-PL. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e05009. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hii, S.L.; Tan, J.S.; Ling, T.C.; Bin Ariff, A. Pullulanase: Role in Starch Hydrolysis and Potential Industrial Applications. Enzym. Res. 2012, 2012, 921362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Schwan, R.F.; Wheals, A.E. The Microbiology of Cocoa Fermentation and its Role in Chocolate Quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yilmaz, M.; Soran, H.; Beyatli, Y. Antimicrobial activities of some Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the soil. Microbiol. Res. 2006, 161, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sumi, C.D.; Yang, B.W.; Yeo, I.-C.; Hahm, Y.T. Antimicrobial peptides of the genus Bacillus: A new era for antibiotics. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cladera-Olivera, F.; Caron, G.; Brandelli, A. Bacteriocin-like substance production by Bacillus licheniformis strain P40. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sharma, N.G.N. Antibacterial activity and characterization of bacteriocin of Bacillus mycoides isolated from whey. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
  81. Fanaei, M.; Emtiazi, G. Microbial assisted (Bacillus mojavensis) production of bio-surfactant lipopeptide with potential pharmaceutical applications and its characterization by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abriouel, H.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Omar, N.B.; Gálvez, A. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 201–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Chopra, L.; Singh, G.; Choudhary, V.; Sahoo, D.K. Sonorensin: An Antimicrobial Peptide, Belonging to the Heterocycloanthracin Subfamily of Bacteriocins, from a New Marine Isolate, Bacillus sonorensis MT93. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Leães, F.L.; Vanin, N.G.; Sant’Anna, V.; Brandelli, A. Use of Byproducts of Food Industry for Production of Antimicrobial Activity by Bacillus sp. P11. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 4, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Torres, N.I.; Noll, K.S.; Xu, S.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Sinko, P.J.; Wachsman, M.B.; Chikindas, M.L. Safety, Formulation and In Vitro Antiviral Activity of the Antimicrobial Peptide Subtilosin Against Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2013, 5, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Bizani, D.; Motta, A.S.; Morrissy, J.A.C.; Terra, R.M.S.; Souto, A.; Brandelli, A. Antibacterial activity of cerein 8A, a bacteriocin-like peptide produced by Bacillus cereus. Int. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  87. Cutting, S.M. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Konuray, G.; Erginkaya, Z. Potential Use of Bacillus coagulans in the Food Industry. Foods 2018, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Shahcheraghi, S.; Ayatollahi, J.; Lotfi, M. Applications of Bacillus subtilis as an important bacterium in medical sciences and human life. Trop. J. Med. Res. 2015, 18, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sneader, W. Drug Discovery: A History; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  91. Malerba, F.; Orsenigo, L. The evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Bus. Hist. 2015, 57, 664–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jozala, A.F.; Geraldes, D.C.; Tundisi, L.L.; Feitosa, V.D.A.; Breyer, C.A.; Cardoso, S.L.; Mazzola, P.; Nascimento, L.D.O.; Rangel-Yagui, C.; Magalhães, P.D.O.; et al. Biopharmaceuticals from microorganisms: From production to purification. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Saengkerdsub, S. Recombinant Protein Production in Bacillus Species, Isolation and Methionine Production in Methionine-producing Microorganisms. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  94. Westers, L.; Westers, H.; Quax, W.J. Bacillus subtilis as cell factory for pharmaceutical proteins: A biotechnological approach to optimize the host organism. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2004, 1694, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ferrer-Miralles, N.; Villaverde, A. Bacterial cell factories for recombinant protein production; expanding the catalogue. Microb. Cell Factories 2013, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Balbás, P.; Lorence, A. Recombinant Gene Expression: Reviews and Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  97. Nakano, M.M.; Zuber, P. Molecular Biology of Antibiotic Production in Bacillus. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1990, 10, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Stein, T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xiang, Y.-Z.; Li, X.-Y.; Zheng, H.-L.; Chen, J.-Y.; Lin, L.-B.; Zhang, Q.-L. Purification and antibacterial properties of a novel bacteriocin against Escherichia coli from Bacillus subtilis isolated from blueberry ferments. LWT 2021, 146, 111456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Franzetti, A.; Tamburini, E.; Banat, I.M. Applications of biological surface active compounds in remediation technologies. In Biosurfactants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nicolas, J. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Surfactin Molecules at the Water-Hexane Interface. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 1377–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Schaller, K.D.; Fox, S.L.; Bruhn, D.F.; Noah, K.S.; Bala, G.A. Characterization of Surfactin from Bacillus subtilis for Application as an Agent for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 115, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. He, L.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y. Production and partial characterization of bacteriocin-like pepitdes by Bacillus licheniformis ZJU12. Microbiol. Res. 2006, 161, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, G.; Zhang, L.; Shi, G. Transcriptome Analysis of Bacillus licheniformis for Improving Bacitracin Production. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cherif, A.; Chehimi, S.; Limem, F.; Hansen, B.; Hendriksen, N.; Daffonchio, D.; Boudabous, A. Detection and characterization of the novel bacteriocin entomocin 9, and safety evaluation of its producer, Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. entomocidus HD9. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Malanicheva, I.A.; Kozlov, D.G.; Efimenko, T.A.; Zenkova, V.A.; Katrukha, G.S.; Reznikova, M.I.; Korolev, A.M.; Borshchevskaya, L.N.; Tarasova, O.D.; Sineokii, S.P.; et al. New antibiotics produced by Bacillus subtilis strains. Microbiology 2014, 83, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Erem, F.; Inan, M.; Karakaş Budak, B.; Certel, M. Partial Purification and Characterization of an Extracellular Metallopeptidase Produced by Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Fe-K1. Trakya Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2020, 21, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Park, C.H.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, W.S.; Byun, S.M. Hetero-and Autoprocessing of the Extracellular Metalloprotease (Mpr) in Bacillus Subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 6457–6464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Fedhila, S.; Nel, P.; Lereclus, D. The Inha2 Metalloprotease of Bacillus Thuringiensis Strain 407 Is Required for Pathogenicity in Insects Infected Via the Oral Route. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 3296–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Hui, C.; Wei, R.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, L. Characterization of the Ammonification, the Relevant Protease Production and Activity in a High-Efficiency Ammonifier Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Dt. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 142, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ji, Z.-L.; Peng, S.; Chen, L.-L.; Liu, Y.; Yan, C.; Zhu, F. Identification and Characterization of a Serine Protease from Bacillus Licheniformis W10: A Potential Antifungal Agent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Thu, N.T.A.; Khue, N.T.M.; Huy, N.D.; Tien, N.Q.D.; Loc, N.H. Characterizations and Fibrinolytic Activity of Serine Protease from Bacillus Subtilis C10. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jagadeesan, Y.; Meenakshisundaram, S.; Saravanan, V.; Balaiah, A. Sustainable Production, Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of Thermo-and-Solvent Stable Alkaline Serine Keratinase from Novel Bacillus Pumilus Ar57 for Promising Poultry Solid Waste Management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kumar, R.; Mehta, A. Isolation, Optimization and Characterization of A-Amylase from Bacillus Alcalophilus. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 2, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  115. Du, R.; Song, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Kim, R.; Zhou, Z.; Han, Y. Purification and Characterization of Novel Thermostable and Ca-Independent A-Amylase Produced by Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Bh072. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, G.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Du, G. Growth-Coupled Evolution and High-Throughput Screening Assisted Rapid Enhancement for Amylase-Producing Bacillus Licheniformis. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lahiri, D.; Nag, M.; Sarkar, T.; Dutta, B.; Ray, R.R. Antibiofilm Activity of A-Amylase from Bacillus Subtilis and Prediction of the Optimized Conditions for Biofilm Removal by Response Surface Methodology (Rsm) and Artificial Neural Network (Ann). Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 1853–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Maity, C.; Samanta, S.; Halder, S.K.; Mohapatra, P.K.D.; Pati, B.R.; Jana, M.; Mondal, K.C. Isozymes of A-Amylases from Newly Isolated Bacillus Thuringiensis Ckb19: Production from Immobilized Cells. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2011, 16, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ye, Z.; Miyake, H.; Tatsumi, M.; Nishimura, S.; Nitta, Y. Two Additional Carbohydrate-Binding Sites of Β-Amylase from Bacillus Cereus Var. Mycoides Are Involved in Hydrolysis and Raw Starch-Binding. J. Biochem. 2004, 135, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ling, H.; Chuan, L.; Rosfarizan, M.; Ariff, A.B. Characterization of Pullulanase Type Ii from Bacillus Cereus H1. 5. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 5, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
  121. Kunamneni, A.; Singh, S. Improved High Thermal Stability of Pullulanase from a Newly Isolated Thermophilic Bacillus Sp. An-7. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, Y.; Niu, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Shi, G. Purification, Characterization and Cloning of a Thermotolerant Isoamylase Produced from Bacillus Sp. Cicim 304. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Dewi, R.T.K.; Mubarik, N.R.; Suhartono, M.T. Medium Optimization of Β-Glucanase Production by Bacillus Subtilis Saha 32.6 Used as Biological Control of Oil Palm Pathogen. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Regmi, S.; Choi, Y.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Khan, M.M.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Cho, S.S.; Jin, Y.; Yoo, J.C.; Suh, J.-W. Industrial Attributes of Β-Glucanase Produced by Bacillus Sp. Csb55 and Its Potential Application as Bio-Industrial Catalyst. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 43, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Vandevenne, M.; Filee, P.; Scarafone, N.; Cloes, B.; Gaspard, G.; Yilmaz, N.; Dumoulin, M.; François, J.; Frère, J.; Galleni, M. The Bacillus Licheniformis Blap B-Lactamase as a Model Protein Scaffold to Study the Insertion of Protein Fragments. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 2260–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Ali, A.; Tayyab, M.; Hashmi, A.S.; Nadeem, A.; Hanif, S.; Firyal, S.; Saeed, S.; Awan, A.R.; Wasim, M. Characterization of a Novel Recombinant β-Lactamase from Bacillus subtilis R5. Pak. J. Zool. 2022, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nwokoro, O. Studies on the production of glucose isomerase by Bacillus licheniformis. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2015, 17, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Esawy, M.A.; Ahmed, E.F.; Helmy, W.A.; Mansour, N.M.; El-Senousy, W.M.; El-Safty, M.M. Production of Levansucrase from Novel Honey Bacillus Subtilis Isolates Capable of Producing Antiviral Levans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, T.; Li, R.; Qian, H.; Mu, W.; Miao, M.; Jiang, B. Biosynthesis of Levan by Levansucrase from Bacillus Methylotrophicus Sk 21.002. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sreena, C.P.; Sebastian, D. Augmented Cellulase Production by Bacillus Subtilis Strain Mu S1 Using Different Statistical Experimental Designs. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pramanik, S.K.; Mahmud, S.; Paul, G.K.; Jabin, T.; Naher, K.; Uddin, M.S.; Zaman, S.; Saleh, M.A. Fermentation Optimization of Cellulase Production from Sugarcane Bagasse by Bacillus Pseudomycoides and Molecular Modeling Study of Cellulase. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yang, G.; Yang, D.; Wang, X.; Ca, W.o. A Novel Thermostable Cellulase-Producing Bacillus Licheniformis A5 Acts Synergistically with Bacillus Subtilis B2 to Improve Degradation of Chinese Distillers’ Grains. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dutta, P.D.; Neog, B.; Goswami, T. Xylanase Enzyme Production from Bacillus Australimaris P5 for Prebleaching of Bamboo (Bambusa Tulda) Pulp. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 243, 122227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Patel, K.; Dudhagara, P. Optimization of Xylanase Production by Bacillus Tequilensis Strain Ud-3 Using Economical Agricultural Substrate and Its Application in Rice Straw Pulp Bleaching. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 101846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Man, R.C.; Shaarani, S.M.; Arshad, Z.I.M.; Mudalip, S.K.A.; Sulaiman, S.Z.; Ramli, A.N.M. Effect of Reaction Parameters on the Production of Cyclodextrin Using Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Bacillus Licheniformis. J. Chem. Eng. Ind. Biotechnol. 2020, 6, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  136. Sonnendecker, C.; Melzer, S.; Zimmermann, W. Engineered Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferases from Bacillus Sp. G-825-6 Produce Large-Ring Cyclodextrins with High Specificity. MicrobiologyOpen 2019, 8, e00757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Upadhyay, D.; Sharma, S.; Shrivastava, D.; Kulshreshtha, N.M. Production and Characterization of B-Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Bacillus Sp. Nd1. J. Basic Microbiol. 2019, 59, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Soumya, P.; Kochupurackal, J. Pineapple Peel Extract as an Effective Substrate for Esterase Production from Bacillus Subtilis E9. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 3024–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Adıgüzel, A.O. Production and Characterization of Thermo-, Halo-and Solvent-Stable Esterase from Bacillus Mojavensis Th309. Biocat. Biotransform. 2020, 38, 210–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Akeed, Y.; Atrash, F.; Naffaa, W. Partial Purification and Characterization of Chitinase Produced by Bacillus Licheniformis B307. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Martínez-Zavala, S.A.; Barboza-Pérez, U.E.; Hernández-Guzmán, G.; Bideshi, D.K.; Barboza-Corona, J.E. Chitinases of Bacillus Thuringiensis: Phylogeny, Modular Structure, and Applied Potentials. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Lekshmi, R.; Nisha, S.A.; Kaleeswaran, B.; Alfarhan, A. Pomegranate Peel Is a Low-Cost Substrate for the Production of Tannase by Bacillus Velezensis Ta3 under Solid State Fermentation. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2020, 32, 1831–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mendoza, D.; Niño, L.; Gelves, G. Dynamic Modeling of Tannase Production from Bacillus Cereus: A Framework Simulation Based on Fed Batch Strategy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2049, 012091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shakir, H.A.; Khan, M.; Irfan, M.; Ali, S.; Yousaf, M.A.; Javed, I.; Qazi, J.I.; Bukhari, S.S.I. Production and Characterization of Tannase by Bacillus Subtilis in Solid State Fermentation of Corn Leaves. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 9, 516–530. [Google Scholar]
  145. Chandrasekaran, R.; Revathi, K.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Kalaivani, K.; Hunter, W.B.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Esmail, G.A. Eco-Friendly Formulation of Wild Bacillus Thuringiensis Secondary Metabolites through Molecular Characterization against the Lepidopteran Pest. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 101, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sansinenea, E. Bacillus Thuringiensis Biotechnology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  147. Bhalla, R.; Dalal, M.; Panguluri, S.K.; Jagadish, B.; Mandaokar, A.D.; Singh, A.; Kumar, P.A. Isolation, Characterization and Expression of a Novel Vegetative Insecticidal Protein Gene of Bacillus Thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 243, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Fedhila, S.; Gohar, M.; Slamti, L.; Nel, P.; Lereclus, D. The Bacillus thuringiensis PlcR-regulated gene inhA2 is necessary, but not sufficient, for virulence. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Okasov, A.; Kalimagambetov, A.; Akhmatullina, N.; Ilin, A. In Vitro Proteolytic Activation of Carcinolytic Parasporal Inclusions of Bacillus Thuringiensis Ssp. Israelensis Bacteria. Biol. Med. 2019, 5, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. de Maagd, R.A.; Bravo, A.; Crickmore, N. How Bacillus Thuringiensis Has Evolved Specific Toxins to Colonize the Insect World. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Höfte, H.; Whiteley, H.R. Insecticidal Crystal Proteins of Bacillus Thuringiensis. Microbiol. Rev. 1989, 53, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Bravo, A.; Gómez, I.; Conde, J.; Muñoz-Garay, C.; Sánchez, J.; Miranda, R.; Zhuang, M.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M. Oligomerization Triggers Binding of a Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1ab Pore-Forming Toxin to Aminopeptidase N Receptor Leading to Insertion into Membrane Microdomains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 2004, 1667, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, X.; Candas, M.; Griko, N.B.; Taussig, R.; Bulla, L.A., Jr. A Mechanism of Cell Death Involving an Adenylyl Cyclase/Pka Signaling Pathway Is Induced by the Cry1ab Toxin of Bacillus Thuringiensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9897–9902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Randhawa, G.J.; Singh, M.; Grover, M. Bioinformatic Analysis for Allergenicity Assessment of Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry Proteins Expressed in Insect-Resistant Food Crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ahmad, M.; Sayyed, A.H.; Saleem, M.A.; Ahmad, M. Evidence for Field Evolved Resistance to Newer Insecticides in Spodoptera Litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan. Crop Prot. 2008, 27, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; He, K.; Ferry, N.; Gatehouse, A.M.R. Cross-Resistance of Cry1ab-Selected Asian Corn Borer to Other Cry Toxins. J. Appl. Entomol. 2010, 134, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Heckel, D.G.; Gahan, L.J.; Baxter, S.W.; Zhao, J.-Z.; Shelton, A.M.; Gould, F.; Tabashnik, B.E. The Diversity of Bt Resistance Genes in Species of Lepidoptera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 95, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Różycki, H.; Dahm, H.; Strzelczyk, E.; Li, C.Y. Diazotrophic Bacteria in Root-Free Soil and in the Root Zone of Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Oak (Quercus robur L.). Appl. Soil Ecol. 1999, 12, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Achouak, W.; Normand, P.; Heulin, T. Comparative Phylogeny of Rrs and Nifh Genes in the Bacillaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1999, 49, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Park, R.-Y.; Choi, M.-E.; Sun, H.-U.; Shin, S.-U. Production of Catechol-Siderophore and Utilization of Transferrin-Bound Iron in Bacillus Cereus. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 1132–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Palazzini, J.M.; Dunlap, C.A.; Bowman, M.J.; Chulze, S.N. Bacillus Velezensis Rc 218 as a Biocontrol Agent to Reduce Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol Accumulation: Genome Sequencing and Secondary Metabolite Cluster Profiles. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Handelsman, J.; Silo-Suh, L.A.; Stabb, E.V.; Raffel, S.J. Target Range of Zwittermicin a, an Aminopolyol Antibiotic from Bacillus Cereus. Curr. Microbiol. 1998, 37, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  163. Wen, X.; Li, X.; Cheng, G.; Chen, S.; Luo, W.; Chen, H.; Hao, Z. Purification and Detection of Zwittermicin a from Bacillus Thuringiensis G03a. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar]
  164. Pérez-García, A.; Romero, D.; de Vicente, A. Plant Protection and Growth Stimulation by Microorganisms: Biotechnological Applications of Bacilli in Agriculture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Dunlap, C.A.; Bowman, M.J.; Schisler, D.A. Genomic Analysis and Secondary Metabolite Production in Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens as 43.3: A Biocontrol Antagonist of Fusarium Head Blight. Biol. Control 2013, 64, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Korenblum, E.; Sebastián, G.V.; Paiva, M.M.; Coutinho, C.M.L.M.; Magalhães, F.C.M.; Peyton, B.M.; Seldin, L. Action of Antimicrobial Substances Produced by Different Oil Reservoir Bacillus Strains against Biofilm Formation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 79, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Beech, I.B.; Sunner, J.A. Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria and Their Role in Corrosion of Ferrous Materials. In Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria Environmental and Engineered Systems; Hamilton, L.L., Barton, W.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 459–482. [Google Scholar]
  168. Djelal, H.; Chniti, S.; Jemni, M.; Weill, A.; Sayed, W.; Amrane, A. Identification of Strain Isolated from Dates (Phœnix dactylifera L.) for Enhancing Very High Gravity Ethanol Production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9886–9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Hutchinson, C.R. Microbial Polyketide Synthases: More and More Prolific. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3336–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Tyc, O.; Song, C.; Dickschat, J.S.; Vos, M.; Garbeva, P. The Ecological Role of Volatile and Soluble Secondary Metabolites Produced by Soil Bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Chen, J.; Liu, T.; Wei, M.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Z. Macrolactin a Is the Key Antibacterial Substance of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens D2wm against the Pathogen Dickeya Chrysanthemi. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 155, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Im, S.M.; Yu, N.H.; Joen, H.W.; Kim, S.O.; Park, H.W.; Park, A.R.; Kim, J.-C. Biological Control of Tomato Bacterial Wilt by Oxydifficidin and Difficidin-Producing Bacillus Methylotrophicus Dr-08. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 163, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mondol, M.A.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, M.a.; Tareq, F.S.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.; Shin, H.J. Ieodomycins a–D, Antimicrobial Fatty Acids from a Marine Bacillus sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1606–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sauer, U.; Cameron, D.C.; Bailey, J.E. Metabolic Capacity of Bacillus Subtilis for the Production of Purine Nucleosides, Riboflavin, and Folic Acid. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 59, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. De Wulf, P.; Vandamme, E.J. Production of D-Ribose by Fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Shih, I.-L.; Van, Y.-T. The Production of Poly-(Γ-Glutamic Acid) from Microorganisms and Its Various Applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 79, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Park, S.-B.; Sung, M.-H.; Uyama, H.; Han, D.K. Poly (Glutamic Acid): Production, Composites, and Medical Applications of the Next-Generation Biopolymer. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 113, 101341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Borhani, M.S.; Etemadifar, Z.; Jorjani, E. Application of Rotatable Central Composite Design for Optimization of Extracellular Alkaline Protease Production from Newly Isolated Bacillus Pseudofirmus Msb4. Biol. J. Microorg. 2017, 5, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
  179. Yokota, A.; Fujii, T.; Goto, K. Alicyclobacillus: Thermophilic Acidophilic Bacilli; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  180. Tianli, Y.; Jiangbo, Z.; Yahong, Y. Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus Bacteria in Juice and Beverage Products: Chemical, Physical, and Combined Control Methods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 771–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Pillot, G.; Sunny, S.; Comes, V.; Kerzenmacher, S. Optimization of Growth and Electrosynthesis of Polyhydroxyalkanoates by the Thermophilic Bacterium Kyrpidia Spormannii. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 17, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bobadilla-Fazzini, R.A.; Cortés, M.P.; Maass, A.; Parada, P. Sulfobacillus Thermosulfidooxidans Strain Cutipay Enhances Chalcopyrite Bioleaching under Moderate Thermophilic Conditions in the Presence of Chloride Ion. AMB Express 2014, 4, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Ni, Z.-Y.; Gu, G.; Yang, H.; Qiu, G. Bioleaching of Pyrrhotite by Sulfobacillus Thermosulfidooxidans. J. Cent. South Univ. 2014, 21, 2638–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Deng, S.; He, G.; Bichao, W.; Guohua, G. Pyrite-Promoted Dissolution of Arsenopyrite in the Presence of Sulfobacillus Thermosulfidooxidans. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 9362–9371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ilyas, S.; Srivastava, R.R.; Kim, H.; Ilyas, N. Biotechnological Recycling of Hazardous Waste Pcbs Using Sulfobacillus Thermosulfidooxidans through Pretreatment of Toxicant Metals: Process Optimization and Kinetic Studies. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Chen, S.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Lv, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, B.; Wang, B. Biocontrol Effects of Brevibacillus Laterosporus Amcc100017 on Potato Common Scab and Its Impact on Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities. Biol. Control 2017, 106, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Joo, H.J.; Kim, H.; Kim, L.; Lee, S.; Ryu, J.-G.; Lee, T. A Brevibacillus Sp. Antagonistic to Mycotoxigenic fusarium spp. Biol. Control 2015, 87, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Arumugam, T.; Kumar, P.S.; Gopinath, K.P. Hptlc Fingerprint Profile, In vitro Antioxidant and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Compound Produced from Brevibacillus brevis-Egs9 against Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 102, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Yasar Yildiz, S.; Anzelmo, G.; Ozer, T.; Radchenkova, N.; Genc, S.; di Donato, P.; Nicolaus, B.; Oner, E.T.; Kambourova, M. Brevibacillus Themoruber: A Promising Microbial Cell Factory for Exopolysaccharide Production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Sankhla, I.S.; Bhati, R.; Singh, A.K.; Mallick, N. Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Co-Polymer Production from a Local Isolate, Brevibacillus Invocatus Mtcc 9039. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Nandanwar, H.S.; Vohra, R.M.; Hoondal, G.S. Trimeric L-N-Carbamoylase from Newly Isolated Brevibacillus Reuszeri Hsn1: A Potential Biocatalyst for Production of L-A-Amino Acids. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2013, 60, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Wei, K.; Yin, H.; Peng, H.; Liu, Z.; Lu, G.; Dang, Z. Characteristics and Proteomic Analysis of Pyrene Degradation by Brevibacillus brevis in Liquid Medium. Chemosphere 2017, 178, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wei, K.; Yin, H.; Peng, H.; Lu, G.; Dang, Z. Bioremediation of Triphenyl Phosphate by Brevibacillus brevis: Degradation Characteristics and Role of Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Vivas, A.; Biro, B.; Nemeth, T.; Barea, J.M.; Azcon, R. Nickel-Tolerant Brevibacillus brevis and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Can Reduce Metal Acquisition and Nickel Toxicity Effects in Plant Growing in Nickel Supplemented Soil. Soil Biology Biochem. 2006, 38, 2694–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Shindhal, T.; Rakholiya, P.; Varjani, S.; Pandey, A.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Ng, H.Y.; Taherzadeh, M.J. A Critical Review on Advances in the Practices and Perspectives for the Treatment of Dye Industry Wastewater. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Daud, N.S.; Din, A.R.J.M.; Rosli, M.A.; Azam, Z.M.; Othman, N.Z.; Sarmidi, M.R. Paenibacillus Polymyxa Bioactive Compounds for Agricultural and Biotechnological Applications. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Derikvand, P.; Etemadifar, Z.; Saber, H. Sulfur Removal from Dibenzothiophene by Newly Isolated Paenibacillus Validus Strain Pd2 and Process Optimization in Aqueous and Biphasic (Model-Oil) Systems. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Sar, T.; Chen, Y.; Bai, Y.; Liu, B.; Agarwal, P.; Stark, B.; Akbas, M. Combining Co-Culturing of Paenibacillus Strains and Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin Expression as a Strategy to Improve Biodesulfurization. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 72, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Sar, T.; Ozturk, M.; Stark, B.C.; Akbas, M.Y. Improvement in Desulfurization of Dibenzothiophene and Dibenzothiophene Sulfone by Paenibacillus Strains Using Immobilization or Nanoparticle Coating. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Davis, M.L.; Thoden, J.B.; Holden, H.M. The X-Ray Structure of Dtdp-4-Keto-6-Deoxy-D-Glucose-3,4-Ketoisomerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 19227–19236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Berditsch, M.; Afonin, S.; Ulrich, A.S. The ability of Aneurinibacillus migulanus (Bacillus brevis) to produce the antibiotic gramicidin S is correlated with phenotype variation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Alenezi, F.N.; Rekik, I.; Bouket, A.C.; Luptakova, L.; Weitz, H.J.; Rateb, M.E.; Jaspars, M.; Woodward, S.; Belbahri, L. Increased Biological Activity of Aneurinibacillus migulanus Strains Correlates with the Production of New Gramicidin Secondary Metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Gowen, S.; Davies, K.G.; Pembroke, B. Potential Use of Pasteuria spp. in the Management of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. In Integrated Management and Biocontrol of Vegetable and Grain Crops Nematodes; Ciancio, A., Mukerji, K.G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 205–219. [Google Scholar]
  204. Talavera, M.; Mizukubo, T.; Ito, K.; Aiba, S. Effect of Spore Inoculum and Agricultural Practices on the Vertical Distribution of the Biocontrol Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacterium Pasteuria Penetrans and Growth of Meloidogyne Incognita-Infected Tomato. Biol. Fert. Soils 2002, 35, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zheng, Z.; Zheng, J.; Peng, D.; Sun, M. Complete Genome Sequence of Fictibacillus Arsenicus G25–54, a Strain with Toxicity to Nematodes. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 241, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Han, X.; Huang, K.; Tang, H.; Ni, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, P.; Tao, F. Steps toward High-Performance Pla: Economical Production of D-Lactate Enabled by a Newly Isolated Sporolactobacillus Terrae Strain. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1800656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Thamacharoensuk, T.; Tolieng, V.; Thongchul, N.; Kodama, K.; Tanasupawat, S. Characterisation of Lactic Acid Producing Sporolactobacillus Strains from Tree Barks in Thailand. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Matsuo, Y.; Kanoh, K.; Yamori, T.; Kasai, H.; Katsuta, A.; Adachi, K.; Shin-ya, K.; Shizuri, Y. Urukthapelstatin a, a Novel Cytotoxic Substance from Marine-Derived Mechercharimyces Asporophorigenens Ym11–542. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Reijula, K.E. Two Bacteria Causing Farmer’s Lung: Fine Structure Ofthermoactinomyces Vulgaris Andsaccharopolyspora Rectivirgula. Mycopathologia 1993, 121, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Steele, D.B.; Fiske, M.J.; Steele, B.P.; Kelley, V.C. Production of a Low-Molecular-Weight, Alkaline-Active, Thermostable Protease by a Novel, Spiral-Shaped Bacterium, Kurthia Spiroforme, Sp. Nov. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1992, 14, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Ruan, Z.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, S.; Sun, L.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhao, B. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Cinosulfuron Degrading Kurthia Sp. From a Methanogenic Microbial Consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 147, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Vreeland, R.H. Advances in Understanding the Biology of Halophilic Microorganisms; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  213. Horikoshi, K.; Antranikian, G.; Bull, A.T.; Robb, F.T.; Stetter, K.O. Extremophiles Handbook; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  214. Seckbach, J.; Oren, A.; Stan-Lotter, H. Polyextremophiles: Life under Multiple Forms of Stress; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  215. Chen, G.-Q.; Jiang, X.-R. Next Generation Industrial Biotechnology Based on Extremophilic Bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 50, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Singh, N.; Choudhury, B. Potential of Lentibacillus Sp. Ns12iitr for Production of Lipids with Enriched Branched-Chain Fatty Acids for Improving Biodiesel Properties Along with Hydrocarbon Co-Production. Extremophiles 2018, 22, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Sundararaman, A.; Srinivasan, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, S.-S. Lentibacillus Alimentarius Sp. Nov., Isolated from Myeolchi-Jeotgal, a Traditional Korean High-Salt Fermented Anchovy. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Xin, L.; Hui-Ying, Y. Purification and Characterization of an Extracellular Esterase with Organic Solvent Tolerance from a Halotolerant Isolate, Salimicrobiumsp. Ly19. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  219. Nagar, S.; Shaw, A.K.; Anand, S.; Celin, S.M.; Rai, P.K. Aerobic Biodegradation of Hmx by Planomicrobium Flavidum. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Poosarla, V.G.; Chandra, T.S. Purification and Characterization of Novel Halo-Acid-Alkali-Thermo-Stable Xylanase from Gracilibacillus Sp. Tscpvg. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 1375–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Amoozegar, M.A.; Safarpour, A.; Noghabi, K.A.; Bakhtiary, T.; Ventosa, A. Halophiles and Their Vast Potential in Biofuel Production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Cosa, S.; Ugbenyen, A.M.; Mabinya, L.V.; Rumbold, K.; Okoh, A.I. Characterization and Flocculation Efficiency of a Bioflocculant Produced by a Marine Halobacillus. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 2671–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Yang, L.; Tan, R.-X.; Wang, Q.; Huang, W.-Y.; Yin, Y.-X. Antifungal Cyclopeptides from Halobacillus Litoralis Ys3106 of Marine Origin. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6545–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Gu, Z.J.; Wang, L.; Le Rudulier, D.; Zhang, B.; Yang, S.S. Erratum To: Characterization of the Glycine Betaine Biosynthetic Genes in the Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Halobacillus Dabanensis D-8t. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Rivadeneyra, M.A.; Párraga, J.; Delgado, R.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A.; Delgado, G. Biomineralization of Carbonates by Halobacillus Trueperi in Solid and Liquid Media with Different Salinities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 48, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Rivadeneyra, M.-A.; Delgado, G.; Soriano, M.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A.; Delgado, R. Biomineralization of Carbonates by Marinococcus Albus and Marinococcus Halophilus Isolated from the Salar De Atacama (Chile). Curr. Microbiol. 1999, 39, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Wei, Y.-H.; Yuan, F.-W.; Chen, W.-C.; Chen, S.-Y. Production and Characterization of Ectoine by Marinococcus Sp. Ect1 Isolated from a High-Salinity Environment. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Mudgil, D.; Baskar, S.; Baskar, R.; Paul, D.; Shouche, Y.S. Biomineralization Potential of Bacillus Subtilis, Rummeliibacillus Stabekisii and Staphylococcus Epidermidis Strains in Vitro Isolated from Speleothems, Khasi Hill Caves, Meghalaya, India. Geomicrobiol. J. 2018, 35, 675–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Fariq, A.; Yasmin, A.; Jamil, M. Production, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activities of Bio-Pigments by Aquisalibacillus Elongatus Mb592, Salinicoccus Sesuvii Mb597, and Halomonas Aquamarina Mb598 Isolated from Khewra Salt Range, Pakistan. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Rezaei, S.; Shahverdi, A.R.; Faramarzi, M.A. Isolation, One-Step Affinity Purification, and Characterization of a Polyextremotolerant Laccase from the Halophilic Bacterium Aquisalibacillus Elongatus and Its Application in the Delignification of Sugar Beet Pulp. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 230, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Rezaie, R.; Rezaei, S.; Jafari, N.; Forootanfar, H.; Khoshayand, M.R.; Faramarzi, M.A. Delignification and Detoxification of Peanut Shell Bio-Waste Using an Extremely Halophilic Laccase from an Aquisalibacillus Elongatus Isolate. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Åqvist, J.; Isaksen, G.V.; Brandsdal, B.O. Computation of Enzyme Cold Adaptation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Radianingtyas, H.; Wright, P.C. Alcohol Dehydrogenases from Thermophilic and Hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 593–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Urbieta, M.S.; Donati, E.R.; Chan, K.G.; Shahar, S.; Sin, L.L.; Goh, K.M. Thermophiles in the Genomic Era: Biodiversity, Science, and Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33 Pt 1, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Wrighton, K.; Agbo, P.; Warnecke, F.; Weber, K.; Brodie, E.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Andersen, G.; Coates, J.D. A Novel Ecological Role of the Firmicutes Identified in Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cells. ISME J. 2008, 2, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Cripps, R.; Eley, K.; Leak, D.; Rudd, B.; Taylor, M.; Todd, M.; Boakes, S.; Martin, S.; Atkinson, T. Metabolic Engineering of Geobacillus Thermoglucosidasius for High Yield Ethanol Production. Metab. Eng. 2009, 11, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Bhalla, A.; Bischoff, K.M.; Sani, R.K. Highly Thermostable Gh39 Β-Xylosidase from a Geobacillus Sp. Strain Wsucf1. BMC Biotechnol. 2014, 14, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Mohr, T.; Aliyu, H.; Küchlin, R.; Polliack, S.; Zwick, M.; Neumann, A.; Cowan, D.; de Maayer, P. Co-Dependent Hydrogen Production by the Facultative Anaerobe Parageobacillus Thermoglucosidasius. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  239. Aliabadi, N.; Aminzadeh, S.; Karkhane, A.A.; Haghbeen, K. Thermostable Chitinase from Cohnella Sp. A01: Isolation and Product Optimization. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  240. Li, G.; Sun, M.; Wu, J.; Ye, M.; Ge, X.; Wei, W.; Li, H.; Hu, F. Identification and Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Endo-Type Β-Agarase Agaw from Cohnella Sp. Strain Lgh. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10019–10029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Rakotoarivonina, H.; Hermant, B.; Monthe, N.; Rémond, C. The Hemicellulolytic Enzyme Arsenal of Thermobacillus Xylanilyticus Depends on the Composition of Biomass Used for Growth. Microb. Cell Factories 2012, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Ahmad, S.; Scopes, R.K. Isolation and Properties of a Constitutive D-Xylulokinase from a Novel Thermophilic Saccharococcus Caldoxylosilyticus Dsm 12041 (Atcc 700356). Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 30, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Zhang, W.; Huang, J.; Jia, M.; Guang, C.; Zhang, T.; Mu, W. Characterization of a Novel D-Lyxose Isomerase from Thermoflavimicrobium Dichotomicum and Its Application for D-Mannose Production. Process Biochem. 2019, 83, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.; Luo, H.; Zhuang, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, S. Complete Genome Sequence of the Dissimilatory Azo Reducing Thermophilic Bacterium Novibacillus Thermophiles Sg-1. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 284, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Yu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhou, S. Dissimilatory Azoreduction of Orange I by a Newly Isolated Moderately Thermophilic Bacterium, Novibacillus Thermophilus Sg-1. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Henze, J.; Randall, D.G. Microbial Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation at Elevated Ph Values (>11) Using Sporosarcina Pasteurii. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5008–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Omoregie, A.I.; Ngu, L.H.; Ong, D.E.L.; Nissom, P.M. Low-Cost Cultivation of Sporosarcina Pasteurii Strain in Food-Grade Yeast Extract Medium for Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation (Micp) Application. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 17, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Omoregie, A.I.; Khoshdelnezamiha, G.; Senian, N.; Ong, D.E.L.; Nissom, P.M. Experimental Optimisation of Various Cultural Conditions on Urease Activity for Isolated Sporosarcina Pasteurii Strains and Evaluation of Their Biocement Potentials. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 109, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Ting, A.S.Y.; Tay, H.; Peh, K.L.; Tan, W.S.; Tee, C.S. Novel Isolation of Thermophilic Ureibacillus Terrenus from Compost of Empty Fruit Bunches (Efb) of Oil Palm and Its Enzymatic Activities. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2013, 2, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Juibari, M.M.; Yeganeh, L.P.; Abbasalizadeh, S.; Azarbaijani, R.; Mousavi, S.H.; Tabatabaei, M.; Jouzani, G.S.; Salekdeh, G.H. Investigation of a Hot-Spring Extremophilic Ureibacillus Thermosphaericus Strain Thermo-Bf for Extracellular Biosynthesis of Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. BioNanoScience 2015, 5, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Okuda, N.; Soneura, M.; Ninomiya, K.; Katakura, Y.; Shioya, S. Biological Detoxification of Waste House Wood Hydrolysate Using Ureibacillus Thermosphaericus for Bioethanol Production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Hatayama, K.; Shoun, H.; Ueda, Y.; Nakamura, A. Tuberibacillus Calidus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Compost Pile and Reclassification of Bacillus Naganoensis Tomimura Et Al. 1990 as Pullulanibacillus Naganoensis Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Laevolacticus Andersch Et Al. 1994 as Sporolactobacillus Laevolacticus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56 Pt 11, 2545–2551. [Google Scholar]
  253. Hogendoorn, C.; Pol, A.; Picone, N.; Cremers, G.; Van Alen, T.A.; Gagliano, A.L.; Jetten, M.S.; D’Alessandro, W.; Quatrini, P.; Op den Camp, H.J. Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide-Utilizing Kyrpidia Spormannii Species from Pantelleria Island, Italy. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Reiner, J.E.; Jung, T.; Lapp, C.J.; Siedler, M.; Bunk, B.; Overmann, J.; Gescher, J. Kyrpidia Spormannii Sp. Nov., a Thermophilic, Hydrogen-Oxidizing, Facultative Autotroph, Isolated from Hydrothermal Systems at São Miguel Island, and Emended Description of the Genus Kyrpidia. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3735–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Hackbarth, M.; Jung, T.; Reiner, J.E.; Gescher, J.; Horn, H.; Hille-Reichel, A.; Wagner, M. Monitoring and Quantification of Bioelectrochemical Kyrpidia Spormannii Biofilm Development in a Novel Flow Cell Setup. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 390, 124604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Niimura, Y.; Koh, E.; Yanagida, F.; Suzuki, K.; Komagata, K.; Kozaki, M. Amphibacillus Xylanus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Facultatively Anaerobic Sporeforming Xylan-Digesting Bacterium Which Lacks Cytochrome, Quinone, and Catalase. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1990, 40, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Aino, K.; Narihiro, T.; Minamida, K.; Kamagata, Y.; Yoshimune, K.; Yumoto, I. Bacterial Community Characterization and Dynamics of Indigo Fermentation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 74, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Hirota, K.; Aino, K.; Yumoto, I. Fermentibacillus Polygoni Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Alkaliphile That Reduces Indigo Dye. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 2247–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Murthy, P.S.; Madhumathi, M. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (Pha) Production from Amphibacillus sp. Biotechnol. Indian J. 2009, 3, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  260. Ibrahim, A.S.S.; El-Tayeb, M.A.; Elbadawi, Y.B.; Al-Salamah, A.A.; Antranikian, G. Hexavalent Chromate Reduction by Alkaliphilic Amphibacillus Sp. Ksucr3 Is Mediated by Copper-Dependent Membrane-Associated Cr(Vi) Reductase. Extremophiles 2012, 16, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Mesbah, N.M.; Wiegel, J. Halophilic Alkali- and Thermostable Amylase from a Novel Polyextremophilic Amphibacillus Sp. Nm-Ra2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Brininger, C.; Spradlin, S.; Cobani, L.; Evilia, C. The More Adaptive to Change, the More Likely You Are to Survive: Protein Adaptation in Extremophiles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 84, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Kasana, R.C.; Pandey, C.B. Exiguobacterium: An Overview of a Versatile Genus with Potential in Industry and Agriculture. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Emtiazi, G.; Abari, A.H.; Rahehagh, F. Removal of Mtbe by Novel Exiguobacterium in Seawater. Desalination Water Treat. 2011, 28, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Weichler, M.T.; Kurteva-Yaneva, N.; Przybylski, D.; Schuster, J.; Müller, R.H.; Harms, H.; Rohwerder, T. Thermophilic coenzyme B12-dependent acyl coenzyme A (CoA) mutase from Kyrpidia tusciae DSM 2912 preferentially catalyzes isomerization of (R)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and 2-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  266. Harirchi, S.; Etemadifar, Z.; Yazdian, F.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Efficacy of Polyextremophilic Aeribacillus Pallidus on Bioprocessing of Beet Vinasse Derived from Ethanol Industries. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Harirchi, S.; Etemadifar, Z.; Mahboubi, A.; Yazdian, F.; Taherzadeh, M.J. The Effect of Calcium/Magnesium Ratio on the Biomass Production of a Novel Thermoalkaliphilic Aeribacillus Pallidus Strain with Highly Heat-Resistant Spores. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2565–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Radchenkova, N.; Vassilev, S.; Martinov, M.; Kuncheva, M.; Panchev, I.; Vlaev, S.; Kambourova, M. Optimization of the Aeration and Agitation Speed of Aeribacillus Palidus 418 Exopolysaccharide Production and the Emulsifying Properties of the Product. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Zheng, C.; Li, Z.; Su, J.; Zhang, R.; Liu, C.; Zhao, M. Characterization and Emulsifying Property of a Novel Bioemulsifier by Aeribacillus Pallidus Ym-1. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Radchenkova, N.; Panchev, I.; Vassilev, S.; Kuncheva, M.; Dobreva, S.; Kambourova, M. Continuous Cultivation of a Thermophilic Bacterium Aeribacillus Pallidus 418 for Production of an Exopolysaccharide Applicable in Cosmetic Creams. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1301–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  271. Başbülbül, G.; Ozteber, M.; Bıyık, H.H.; Erman, O.; Bozdoğan, B. Presence of Enta and Entb Genes among Thermophilic Bacteria Isolated from Hot Springs in Turkey. Acta Microbiol. Bulg. 2018, 34, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  272. Yasawong, M.; Areekit, S.; Pakpitchareon, A.; Santiwatanakul, S.; Chansiri, K. Characterization of Thermophilic Halotolerant Aeribacillus Pallidus Td1 from Tao Dam Hot Spring, Thailand. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5294–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  273. Bose, H.; Satyanarayana, T. Suitability of the Alkalistable Carbonic Anhydrase from a Polyextremophilic Bacterium Aeribacillus Pallidus Tshb1 in Biomimetic Carbon Sequestration. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 1515–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Tourova, T.P. Detection of N-Alkane Biodegradation Genes Alkb and Lada in Thermophilic Hydrocarbon-Oxidizing Bacteria of the Genera Aeribacillus and Geobacillus. Microbiology 2016, 85, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Mehetre, G.T.; Dastager, S.G.; Dharne, M.S. Biodegradation of Mixed Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Pure and Mixed Cultures of Biosurfactant Producing Thermophilic and Thermo-Tolerant Bacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 679, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Yildirim, V.; Baltaci, M.O.; Ozgencli, I.; Sisecioglu, M.; Adiguzel, A.; Adiguzel, G. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Thermostable Serine Alkaline Protease from Aeribacillus Pallidus C10: A Potential Additive for Detergents. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  277. Mechri, S.; Berrouina, M.B.E.; Benmrad, M.O.; Jaouadi, N.Z.; Rekik, H.; Moujehed, E.; Chebbi, A.; Sayadi, S.; Chamkha, M.; Bejar, S.; et al. Characterization of a Novel Protease from Aeribacillus Pallidus Strain Vp3 with Potential Biotechnological Interest. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 94, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Dongdong, Z.; Yi, W.; Chunfang, Z.; Dan, Z.; Peng, G.; Zongjun, C. Characterization of a Thermophilic Lignocellulose-Degrading Microbial Consortium with High Extracellular Xylanase Activity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 305–313. [Google Scholar]
  279. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Processing Aids; Silano, V.; Baviera, J.M.B.; Bolognesi, C.; Brüschweiler, B.J.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Crebelli, R.; Gott, D.M.; Grob, K.; Lampi, E.; et al. Safety Evaluation of the Food Enzyme 4-A-Glucanotransferase from Aeribacillus pallidus (Strain ae-Sas). EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05628. [Google Scholar]
  280. Ma, Y.; Zhong, H.; He, Z. Cr(Vi) Reductase Activity Locates in the Cytoplasm of Aeribacillus Pallidus Bk1, a Novel Cr(Vi)-Reducing Thermophile Isolated from Tengchong Geothermal Region, China. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Samaei-Nouroozi, A.; Rezaei, S.; Khoshnevis, N.; Doosti, M.; Hajihoseini, R.; Khoshayand, M.R.; Faramarzi, M.A. Medium-Based Optimization of an Organic Solvent-Tolerant Extracellular Lipase from the Isolated Halophilic Alkalibacillus Salilacus. Extremophiles 2015, 19, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Abdel-Hamed, A.R.; Abo-Elmatty, D.M.; Wiegel, J.; Mesbah, N.M. Biochemical Characterization of a Halophilic, Alkalithermophilic Protease from Alkalibacillus Sp. Nm-Da2. Extremophiles 2016, 20, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Bergmann, S.; David, F.; Franco-Lara, E.; Wittmann, C.; Krull, R. Ectoine Production by Alkalibacillus Haloalkaliphilus—Bioprocess Development Using Response Surface Methodology and Model-Driven Strategies. Eng. Life Sci. 2013, 13, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Goh, K.M.; Kahar, U.M.; Chai, Y.Y.; Chong, C.S.; Chai, K.P.; Ranjani, V.; Illias, R.; Chan, K.G. Recent Discoveries and Applications of Anoxybacillus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 1475–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Cabrol, L.; Marone, A.; Tapia-Venegas, E.; Steyer, J.-P.; Ruiz-Filippi, G.; Trably, E. Microbial Ecology of Fermentative Hydrogen Producing Bioprocesses: Useful Insights for Driving the Ecosystem Function. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 158–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Stolz, J.F.; Oremland, R.S. Bacterial Respiration of Arsenic and Selenium. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 23, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Cui, K.; Wu, Q.; Xu, Y. Biodegradation of Ethyl Carbamate and Urea with Lysinibacillus Sphaericus Mt33 in Chinese Liquor Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Mohamed, E.A.H.; Farag, A.G. Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Different Bacillus and Lysinibacillus Species. Bioremed. J. 2015, 19, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Marilena Stancu, M. Investigation of the Organic Solvent Resistance Mechanisms in Rhodococcus and Lysinibacillus Using Several Molecular Forensic Tools. Environ. Forensics 2015, 16, 242–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Mokashe, N.; Chaudhari, B.; Patil, U. Detergent-Compatible Robust Alkaline Protease from Newly Isolated Halotolerant Salinicoccus Sp. Un-12. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2017, 20, 1377–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Mokashe, N.; Chaudhari, A.; Patil, U. Optimal Production and Characterization of Alkaline Protease from Newly Isolated Halotolerant Jeotgalicoccus sp. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Mazhar, S.; Hill, C.; McAuliffe, O. Chapter One—The Genus Macrococcus: An Insight into Its Biology, Evolution, and Relationship with Staphylococcus. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Gadd, G.M., Sariaslani, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  293. Abdel-Aziz, M.; Abou-El-Sherbini, K.S.; Hamzawy, E.; Amr, M.H.A.; El-Dafrawy, S. Green Synthesis of Silver Nano-Particles by Macrococcus Bovicus and Its Immobilization onto Montmorillonite Clay for Antimicrobial Functionality. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 2225–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Xu, J.; Xu, X.; Han, Y.; Sheng, S.; Meng, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Di, L. Evaluation of a Novel Thermophilic Nitrifying Bacillaceae Species Aliibacillus Thermotolerans Bm62t Promoting Nitrogen Retention in Livestock Manure Compost. Environ. Progress Sustain. Energy 2020, 39, e13357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Xu, J.; Xu, X.-H.; Men, M.-Q.; Meng, Q.-X.; Xu, B.-S. Aliibacillus Thermotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov.: A Thermophilic and Heterotrophic Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterium from Compost. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Schmidt, M.; Stougaard, P. Identification, Cloning and Expression of a Cold-Active Β-Galactosidase from a Novel Arctic Bacterium, Alkalilactibacillus Ikkense. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Schmidt, M.; Priemé, A.; Johansen, A.; Stougaard, P. Alkalilactibacillus Ikkensis, Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Enzyme-Producing Bacterium from a Cold and Alkaline Environment in Greenland. Extremophiles 2012, 16, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Chuprom, J.; Bovornreungroj, P.; Ahmad, M.; Kantachote, D.; Enomoto, T. Statistical Optimization for the Improved Production of an Extracellular Alkaline Nuclease by Halotolerant Allobacillus Halotolerans Msp69: Scale-up Approach and Its Potential as Flavor Enhancer of Fish Sauce. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 8, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Ghatge, S.; Yang, Y.; Song, W.-Y.; Kim, T.-Y.; Hur, H.-G. A Novel Laccase from Thermoalkaliphilic Bacterium Caldalkalibacillus Thermarum Strain Ta2.A1 Able to Catalyze Dimerization of a Lignin Model Compound. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 4075–4086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. de Jong, S.I.; Broek, M.A.V.D.; Merkel, A.Y.; Cortes, P.D.L.T.; Kalamorz, F.; Cook, G.M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; McMillan, D.G.G. Genomic Analysis of Caldalkalibacillus Thermarum Ta2.A1 Reveals Aerobic Alkaliphilic Metabolism and Evolutionary Hallmarks Linking Alkaliphilic Bacteria and Plant Life. Extremophiles 2020, 24, 923–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Hiraga, K.; Nishikata, Y.; Namwong, S.; Tanasupawat, S.; Takada, K.; Oda, K. Purification and Characterization of Serine Proteinase from a Halophilic Bacterium, Filobacillus Sp. Rf2–5. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Calandrelli, V.; Gambacorta, A.; Romano, I.; Carratore, V.; Lama, L. A Novel Thermo-Alkali Stable Catalase–Peroxidase from Oceanobacillus Oncorhynchi Subsp. Incaldaniensis: Purification and Characterization. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Romano, I.; Lama, L.; Nicolaus, B.; Poli, A.; Gambacorta, A.; Giordano, A. Oceanobacillus Oncorhynchi Subsp. Incaldanensis Subsp. Nov., an Alkalitolerant Halophile Isolated from an Algal Mat Collected from a Sulfurous Spring in Campania (Italy), and Emended Description of Oceanobacillus Oncorhynchi. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Seghal Kiran, G.; Lipton, A.N.; Kennedy, J.; Dobson, A.D.W.; Selvin, J. A Halotolerant Thermostable Lipase from the Marine Bacterium Oceanobacillus Sp. Pumb02 with an Ability to Disrupt Bacterial Biofilms. Bioengineered 2014, 5, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  305. Hirota, K.; Nishita, M.; Matsuyama, H.; Yumoto, I. Paralkalibacillus Indicireducens Gen., Nov., Sp. Nov., an Indigo-Reducing Obligate Alkaliphile Isolated from Indigo Fermentation Liquor Used for Dyeing. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4050–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Yu, J.; Lu, K.; Dong, X.; Xie, W. Virgibacillus Sp. Sk37 and Staphylococcus Nepalensis Js11 as Potential Starters to Improve Taste of Shrimp Paste. LWT 2022, 154, 112657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Udomsil, N.; Chen, S.; Rodtong, S.; Yongsawatdigul, J. Improvement of Fish Sauce Quality by Combined Inoculation of Tetragenococcus Halophilus Ms33 and Virgibacillus Sp. Sk37. Food Control 2017, 73, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Lapsongphon, N.; Yongsawatdigul, J. Production and Purification of Antioxidant Peptides from a Mungbean Meal Hydrolysate by Virgibacillus Sp. Sk37 Proteinase. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Lomthong, T.; Lertwattanasakul, N.; Kitpreechavanich, V. Production of Raw Starch Degrading Enzyme by the Thermophilic Filamentous Bacterium Laceyella Sacchari Lp175 and Its Application for Ethanol Production from Dried Cassava Chips. Starch Stärke 2016, 68, 1264–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Shibasaki, H.; Uchimura, K.; Miura, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Usami, R.; Horikoshi, K. Highly Thermostable and Surfactant-Activated Chitinase from a Subseafloor Bacterium, Laceyella Putida. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7845–7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Suresh, M.; Renugadevi, B.; Brammavidhya, S.; Iyapparaj, P.; Anantharaman, P. Antibacterial Activity of Red Pigment Produced by Halolactibacillus Alkaliphilus Msrd1—An Isolate from Seaweed. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Arun, J.; Selvakumar, S.; Sathishkumar, R.; Moovendhan, M.; Ananthan, G.; Maruthiah, T.; Palavesam, A. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of an Exopolysaccharide from a Salt Pan Bacterium Halolactibacillus Miurensis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 155, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Zhang, K.; Su, L.; Wu, J. Recent Advances in Recombinant Protein Production by Bacillus Subtilis. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 295–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  314. van Tilburg, A.Y.; Cao, H.; van der Meulen, S.B.; Solopova, A.; Kuipers, O.P. Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology Employing Lactococcus lactis and Bacillus subtilis Cell Factories. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 59, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  315. Kimura, K.; Yokoyama, S. Trends in the Application of Bacillus in Fermented Foods. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Hong, K.-Q.; Liu, D.-Y.; Chen, T.; Wang, Z.-W. Recent Advances in Crispr/Cas9 Mediated Genome Editing in Bacillus Subtilis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Park, S.A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Park, H.A.; Kim, S.Y.; Sudheer, P.D.V.N.; Yang, Y.-H.; Choi, K.-Y. Bacillus Subtilis as a Robust Host for Biochemical Production Utilizing Biomass. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 827–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Aristidou, A.; Penttilä, M. Metabolic Engineering Applications to Renewable Resource Utilization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Bhavsar, A.P.; Zhao, X.; Brown, E.D. Development and Characterization of a Xylose-Dependent System for Expression of Cloned Genes in Bacillus Subtilis: Conditional Complementation of a Teichoic Acid Mutant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  320. Wilhelm, M.; Hollenberg, C.P. Nucleotide Sequence of the Bacillus Subtilis Xylose Isomerase Gene: Extensive Homology between the Bacillus and Escherichia Coli Enzyme. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 5717–5722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  321. Krispin, O.; Allmansberger, R. The Bacillus Subtilis Arae Protein Displays a Broad Substrate Specificity for Several Different Sugars. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 3250–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  322. Park, Y.-C.; Jun, S.Y.; Seo, J.-H. Construction and Characterization of Recombinant Bacillus Subtilis Jy123 Able to Transport Xylose Efficiently. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 161, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Fu, J.; Li, N.; Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chen, T. Production of Acetoin through Simultaneous Utilization of Glucose, Xylose, and Arabinose by Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  324. Li, X.; Huang, C.; Yu, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.-J.; Chen, T. Highly Efficient Hemicellulose Utilization for Acetoin Production by an Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 3428–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Chen, T.; Liu, W.; Fu, J.; Zhang, B.; Tang, Y. Engineering Bacillus Subtilis for Acetoin Production from Glucose and Xylose Mixtures. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 168, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Sun, J.-D.; Tang, C.; Zhou, J.; Wei, P.; Wang, Y.-J.; An, W.; Yan, Z.-Y.; Yong, X.-Y. Production of Poly-Γ-Glutamic Acid (Γ-Pga) from Xylose-Glucose Mixtures by Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens C1. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Gao, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, S.; Qi, G. Production of Optically Pure 2,3-Butanediol from Miscanthus Floridulus Hydrolysate Using Engineered Bacillus Licheniformis Strains. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Cal, A.J.; Kibblewhite, R.E.; Sikkema, W.D.; Torres, L.F.; Hart-Cooper, W.M.; Orts, W.J.; Lee, C.C. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Copolymers Containing 4-Hydroxybutyrate in Engineered Bacillus Megaterium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Ashiuchi, M. Microbial Production and Chemical Transformation of Poly-Γ-Glutamate. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Halmschlag, B.; Putri, S.P.; Fukusaki, E.; Blank, L.M. Poly-Γ-Glutamic Acid Production by Bacillus Subtilis 168 Using Glucose as the Sole Carbon Source: A Metabolomic Analysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 130, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Cai, D.; Chen, Y.; He, P.; Wang, S.; Mo, F.; Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Nomura, C.T.; Wen, Z.; Ma, X.; et al. Enhanced Production of Poly-Γ-Glutamic Acid by Improving Atp Supply in Metabolically Engineered Bacillus Licheniformis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 2541–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Stark, B.C.; Dikshit, K.L.; Pagilla, K.R. The Biochemistry of Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin. Computational and structural. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 3, e201210002. [Google Scholar]
  333. Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Wang, M.; Yang, H.; Shen, Z. Enhanced Biosynthesis and Characterization of Surfactin Isoforms with Engineered Bacillus Subtilis through Promoter Replacement and Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin Co-Expression. Process Biochem. 2018, 70, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Jung, J.; Yu, K.O.; Ramzi, A.B.; Choe, S.H.; Kim, S.W.; Han, S.O. Improvement of Surfactin Production in Bacillus Subtilis Using Synthetic Wastewater by Overexpression of Specific Extracellular Signaling Peptides, Comx and Phrc. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Akdoğan, M.; Çelik, E. Enhanced Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Biopolymer by Recombinant Bacillus Megaterium in Fed-Batch Bioreactors. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Biswas, R.; Yamaoka, M.; Nakayama, H.; Kondo, T.; Yoshida, K.-I.; Bisaria, V.S.; Kondo, A. Enhanced Production of 2,3-Butanediol by Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 94, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Kang, I.Y.; Park, J.M.; Hong, W.-K.; Kim, Y.S.; Jung, Y.R.; Kim, S.-B.; Heo, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-M.; Kang, J.Y.; Oh, B.-R.; et al. Enhanced Production of 2,3-Butanediol by a Genetically Engineered Bacillus Sp. Brc1 Using a Hydrolysate of Empty Palm Fruit Bunches. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 38, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Qiu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Wen, Z.; Nomura, C.T.; Wu, S.; Chen, S. Engineering Bacillus Licheniformis for the Production of Meso-2,3-Butanediol. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Fu, J.; Huo, G.; Feng, L.; Mao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ma, H.; Chen, T.; Zhao, X. Metabolic Engineering of Bacillus Subtilis for Chiral Pure Meso-2,3-Butanediol Production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  340. Drejer, E.B.; Chan, D.T.C.; Haupka, C.; Wendisch, V.F.; Brautaset, T.; Irla, M. Methanol-Based Acetoin Production by Genetically Engineered Bacillus Methanolicus. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 788–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Kim, E.-J.; Seo, D.; Choi, K.-Y. Bioalcohol Production from Spent Coffee Grounds and Okara Waste Biomass by Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 10, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Kogan, G.; Šoltés, L.; Stern, R.; Gemeiner, P. Hyaluronic Acid: A Natural Biopolymer with a Broad Range of Biomedical and Industrial Applications. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Li, Y.; Shi, Z.; Shao, Y.; Wu, M.; Li, G.; Ma, T. Temperature-Controlled Molecular Weight of Hyaluronic Acid Produced by Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 43, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Li, Y.; Li, G.; Zhao, X.; Shao, Y.; Wu, M.; Ma, T. Regulation of Hyaluronic Acid Molecular Weight and Titer by Temperature in Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Widner, B.; Behr, R.; Von Dollen, S.; Tang, M.; Heu, T.; Sloma, A.; Sternberg, D.; DeAngelis, P.L.; Weigel, P.H.; Brown, S. Hyaluronic Acid Production in Bacillus Subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 3747–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  346. Chien, L.-J.; Lee, C. Enhanced Hyaluronic Acid Production in Bacillus subtilis by Coexpressing Bacterial Hemoglobin. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  347. Westbrook, A.W.; Ren, X.; Oh, J.; Moo-Young, M.; Chou, C.P. Metabolic Engineering to Enhance Heterologous Production of Hyaluronic Acid in Bacillus Subtilis. Metab. Eng. 2018, 47, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Jin, P.; Kang, Z.; Yuan, P.; Du, G.; Chen, J. Production of Specific-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronan by Metabolically Engineered Bacillus Subtilis 168. Metab. Eng. 2016, 35, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Jin, P.; Liang, Z.; Li, H.; Chen, C.; Xue, Y.; Du, Q. Biosynthesis of Low-Molecular-Weight Mannan Using Metabolically Engineered Bacillus Subtilis 168. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Jin, P.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, P.; Kang, Z.; Du, G.; Chen, J. Efficient Biosynthesis of Polysaccharides Chondroitin and Heparosan by Metabolically Engineered Bacillus Subtilis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 140, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Yang, X.-M.; Wang, S.S. Phase-Specific Optimization of Multiple Endotoxin-Protein Production with Genetically Engineered Bacillus Thuringiensis. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2000, 31, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Huang, D.-F.; Zhang, J.; Song, F.-P.; Lang, Z.-H. Microbial Control and Biotechnology Research on Bacillus Thuringiensis in China. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 95, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Sanchis, V.; Agaisse, H.; Chaufaux, J.; Lereclus, D. A Recombinase-Mediated System for Elimination of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Markers from Genetically Engineered Bacillus Thuringiensis Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  354. Yan, G.; Song, F.; Shu, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Huang, D.; Feng, S.; Zhang, J. An Engineered Bacillus Thuringiensis Strain with Insecticidal Activity against Scarabaeidae (Anomala Corpulenta) and Chrysomelidae (Leptinotarsa Decemlineata and Colaphellus Bowringi). Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Lertcanawanichakul, M.; Wiwat, C.; Bhumiratana, A.; Dean, D.H. Expression of Chitinase-Encoding Genes in Bacillus Thuringiensis and Toxicity of Engineered B. Thuringiensis Subsp. Aizawai toward Lymantria Dispar Larvae. Curr. Microbiol. 2004, 48, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  356. El-Menofy, W.; Osman, G.; Assaeedi, A.; Salama, M. A Novel Recombinant Baculovirus Overexpressing a Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1ab Toxin Enhances Insecticidal Activity. Biol. Proced. Online 2014, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  357. Yu, J.; Pang, Y.; Tang, M.; Xie, R.; Tan, L.; Zeng, S.; Yuan, M.; Liu, J. Highly Toxic and Broad-Spectrum Insecticidal Bacillus Thuringiensis Engineered by Using the Transposon Tn917 and Protoplast Fusion. Curr. Microbiol. 2001, 43, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Doruk, T.; Avican, U.; Camci, I.Y.; Gedik, S.T. Overexpression of Polyphosphate Kinase Gene (Ppk) Increases Bioinsecticide Production by Bacillus Thuringiensis. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Donker, H.J.L. Bijdrage Tot De Kennis Der Boterzuur-, Butylalcohol-En Acetongistingen; Meinema: Delft, The Netherlands, 1926. [Google Scholar]
  360. Oshima, T.; Moriya, T. A Preliminary Analysis of Microbial and Biochemical Properties of High-Temperature Compost. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1125, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Kolinko, S.; Wu, Y.-W.; Tachea, F.; Denzel, E.; Hiras, J.; Gabriel, R.; Bäcker, N.; Chan, L.J.G.; Eichorst, S.A.; Frey, D.; et al. A Bacterial Pioneer Produces Cellulase Complexes That Persist through Community Succession. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  362. Lal, D.; Khan, F.; Gupta, S.K.; Schumann, P.; Lal, R. Edaphobacillus Lindanitolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Hexachlorocyclohexane (Hch) Contaminated Soil. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, M.; Du, Q.; Li, Q.; Ma, P. Jilinibacillus Soli Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Family Bacillaceae. Arch. Microbiol. 2015, 197, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Pringsheim, E.G.; Robinow, C.F.; Ainsworth, G.C.; Brown, A.M.; Marsden, P.S.S.F.; Smith, P.A.; Spilsbury, J.F. Observations on Two Very Large Bacteria, Caryophanon Latum Peshkoff and Lineola Longa (Nomen Provisorium). Microbiology 1947, 1, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  365. Sefrji, F.O.; Marasco, R.; Michoud, G.; Seferji, K.A.; Merlino, G.; Daffonchio, D. Insights into the Cultivable Bacterial Fraction of Sediments from the Red Sea Mangroves and Physiological, Chemotaxonomic, and Genomic Characterization of Mangrovibacillus Cuniculi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Bacillaceae Family. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 77798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Alou, M.T.; Rathored, J.; Lagier, J.-C.; Khelaifia, S.; Labas, N.; Sokhna, C.; Diallo, A.; Raoult, D.; Dubourg, G. Massilibacterium Senegalense Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Bacterial Genus Isolated from the Human Gut. New Microbes New Infect. 2016, 10, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  367. Orsi, R.H.; Wiedmann, M. Characteristics and Distribution of Listeria Spp., Including Listeria Species Newly Described since 2009. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5273–5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  368. Alou, M.T.; Nguyen, T.-T.; Armstrong, N.; Rathored, J.; Khelaifia, S.; Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.-E.; Lagier, J.-C. Numidum Massiliense Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Member of the Bacillaceae Family Isolated from the Human Gut. New Microbes New Infect. 2016, 12, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  369. Alou, M.T.; Rathored, J.; Lagier, J.-C.; Khelaifia, S.; Michelle, C.; Sokhna, C.; Diallo, A.; Fournier, P.-E.; Raoult, D.; Edouard, S. Rubeoparvulum Massiliense Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Bacterial Genus Isolated from the Human Gut of a Senegalese Infant with Severe Acute Malnutrition. New Microbes New Infect. 2017, 15, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Ping, W.; Zhou, D.; Sun, J.; Fan, C.; Ding, Y. A New Genus of Oral Bacteria in Human. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao Acta Microbiol. Sin. 1998, 38, 146–151. [Google Scholar]
  371. Tetz, G.; Tetz, V. Draft Genome Sequence of Tetzosporium hominis Vt-49 Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Dental Decay Plaque of a Patient with Periodontitis. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e01541-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  372. Jiang, Z.; Yuan, C.; Xiao, M.; Tian, X.; Khan, I.; Kim, C.; Zhi, X.; Li, W. Abyssicoccus Albus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Family Staphylococcaceae Isolated from Marine Sediment of the Indian Ocean. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2016, 109, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Miñana-Galbis, D.; Pinzón, D.L.; Lorén, J.G.; Manresa, À.; Oliart-Ros, R.M. Reclassification of Geobacillus Pallidus (Scholz Et Al. 1988) Banat Et Al. 2004 as Aeribacillus Pallidus Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1600–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  374. Wang, Y.; Chunyu, W.-X.; Jiang, G.-Q.; Huang, L.; Zhang, B.; Ji, Y.; Ding, Z.-G.; Yin, M.; Tang, S.-K. Aidingibacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Family Bacillaceae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Wisotzkey, J.D.; Jurtshuk, P.; Fox, G.E.; Deinhard, G.; Poralla, K. Comparative Sequence Analyses on the 16s Rrna (Rdna) of Bacillus Acidocaldarius, Bacillus Acidoterrestris, and Bacillus Cycloheptanicus and Proposal for Creation of a New Genus, Alicyclobacillus Gen. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1992, 42, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  376. Amoozegar, M.A.; Bagheri, M.; Makhdoumi-Kakhki, A.; Didari, M.; Schumann, P.; Nikou, M.M.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Aliicoccus Persicus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Halophilic Member of the Firmicutes Isolated from a Hypersaline Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 6, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  377. Jeon, C.O.; Lim, J.-M.; Lee, J.-M.; Xu, L.-H.; Jiang, C.-L.; Kim, C.-J. Reclassification of Bacillus Haloalkaliphilus Fritze 1996 as Alkalibacillus Haloalkaliphilus Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. And the Description of Alkalibacillus Salilacus Sp. Nov., a Novel Halophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Salt Lake in China. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1891–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Joshi, A.; Thite, S.; Karodi, P.; Joseph, N.; Lodha, T. Alkalihalobacterium Elongatum Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov.: An Antibiotic-Producing Bacterium Isolated from Lonar Lake and Reclassification of the Genus Alkalihalobacillus into Seven Novel Genera. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 722369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Zhao, B.; Lu, W.; Zhang, S.; Liu, K.; Yan, Y.; Li, J. Reclassification of Bacillus Saliphilus as Alkalicoccus Saliphilus Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov., and Description of Alkalicoccus Halolimnae Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Salt Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1557–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Sheu, S.-Y.; Arun, A.B.; Jiang, S.-R.; Young, C.-C.; Chen, W.-M. Allobacillus Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Isolated from Shrimp Paste. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1023–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Didari, M.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Bagheri, M.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Alteribacillus Bidgolensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium from a Hypersaline Lake, and Reclassification of Bacillus Persepolensis as Alteribacillus Persepolensis Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 11, 2691–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  382. Sakai, M.; Deguchi, D.; Hosoda, A.; Kawauchi, T.; Ikenaga, M. Ammoniibacillus Agariperforans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermophilic, Agar-Degrading Bacterium Isolated from Compost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 2, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Zaitsev, G.M.; Tsitko, I.V.; Rainey, F.A.; Trotsenko, Y.A.; Uotila, J.S.; Stackebrandt, E.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. New Aerobic Ammonium-Dependent Obligately Oxalotrophic Bacteria: Description of Ammoniphilus Oxalaticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Ammoniphilus Oxalivorans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  384. Zavarzina, D.G.; Tourova, T.P.; Kolganova, T.V.; Boulygina, E.S.; Zhilina, T.N. Description of Anaerobacillus Alkalilacustre Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov.—Strictly Anaerobic Diazotrophic Bacillus Isolated from Soda Lake and Transfer of Bacillus Arseniciselenatis, Bacillus Macyae, and Bacillus Alkalidiazotrophicus to Anaerobacillus as the New Combinations A. Arseniciselenatis Comb. Nov., A. Macyae Comb. Nov., and A. Alkalidiazotrophicus Comb. Nov. Microbiology 2009, 78, 723–731. [Google Scholar]
  385. Shida, O.; Takagi, H.; Kadowaki, K.; Komagata, K. Proposal for Two New Genera, Brevibacillus Gen. Nov. And Aneurinibacillus Gen. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1996, 46, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  386. Pikuta, E.; Lysenko, A.; Chuvilskaya, N.; Mendrock, U.; Hippe, H.; Suzina, N.; Nikitin, D.; Osipov, G.; Laurinavichius, K. Anoxybacillus Pushchinensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Anaerobic, Alkaliphilic, Moderately Thermophilic Bacterium from Manure, and Description of Anoxybacillus Flavitherms Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 2109–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  387. Amoozegar, M.A.; Bagheri, M.; Didari, M.; Mehrshad, M.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Aquibacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium from a Hypersaline Lake, and Reclassification of Virgibacillus Koreensis as Aquibacillus Koreensis Comb. Nov. And Virgibacillus Albus as Aquibacillus Albus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 11, 3616–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  388. Marquez, M.C.; Carrasco, I.J.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Cowan, D.; Jones, B.; Grant, W.D.; Ventosa, A. Aquisalibacillus Elongatus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium of the Family Bacillaceae Isolated from a Saline Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1922–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  389. Liu, Y.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, M.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.-H. Aureibacillus Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Marine Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 11, 3950–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  390. Cohn, F. Untersuchungen Über Bacterien: I; JU Kern: Toky, Japan, 1875. [Google Scholar]
  391. Guan, X.; Liu, C.; Fang, B.; Zhao, J.; Jin, P.; Li, J.; Jia, F.; Wang, X.; Xiang, W. Baia Soyae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Mesophilic Representative of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae, Isolated from Soybean Root [Glycine Max (L.) Merr]. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 10, 3754–3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  392. Manorama, R.; Pindi, P.K.; Reddy, G.S.N.; Shivaji, S. Bhargavaea Cecembensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Chagos–Laccadive Ridge System in the Indian Ocean. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2618–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Sneath, P.H.A.; Jones, D. Brochothrix, a New Genus Tentatively Placed in the Family Lactobacillaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1976, 26, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  394. Tsujimoto, Y.; Saito, R.; Furuya, H.; Ishihara, D.; Sahara, T.; Kimura, N.; Nishino, T.; Tsuruoka, N.; Shigeri, Y.; Watanabe, K. Caenibacillus Caldisaponilyticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermophilic, Spore-Forming and Phospholipid-Degrading Bacterium Isolated from Acidulocompost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 2684–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  395. Min, U.-G.; Kim, S.-J.; Hong, H.; Kim, S.-G.; Gwak, J.-H.; Jung, M.-Y.; Kim, J.-G.; Na, J.-G.; Rhee, S.-K. Calculibacillus Koreensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Anaerobic Fe(Iii)-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from Sediment of Mine Tailings. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Xue, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, Y.; Cowan, D.; Heaphy, S.; Grant, W.D.; Jones, B.; Ventosa, A.; Ma, Y. Caldalkalibacillus Thermarum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Alkalithermophilic Bacterium from a Hot Spring in China. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Coorevits, A.; Dinsdale, A.E.; Halket, G.; Lebbe, L.; de Vos, P.; van Landschoot, A.; Logan, N.A. Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Geobacillus: Emendation of Geobacillus, G. Stearothermophilus, G. Jurassicus, G. Toebii, G. Thermodenitrificans and G. Thermoglucosidans (Nom. Corrig., Formerly ‘Thermoglucosidasius’); Transfer of Bacillus Thermantarcticus to the Genus as G. Thermantarcticus Comb. Nov.; Proposal of Caldibacillus Debilis Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov.; Transfer of G. Tepidamans to Anoxybacillus as A. Tepidamans Comb. Nov.; and Proposal of Anoxybacillus Caldiproteolyticus Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 7, 1470–1485. [Google Scholar]
  398. Moriya, T.; Hikota, T.; Yumoto, I.; Ito, T.; Terui, Y.; Yamagishi, A.; Oshima, T. Calditerricola Satsumensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Calditerricola Yamamurae Sp. Nov., Extreme Thermophiles Isolated from a High-Temperature Compost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  399. Adiguzel, A.; Ay, H.; Baltaci, M.O.; Akbulut, S.; Albayrak, S.; Omeroglu, M.A. Genome-Based Classification of Calidifontibacillus Erzurumensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Hot Spring in Turkey, with Reclassification of Bacillus Azotoformans as Calidifontibacillus Azotoformans Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Oryziterrae as Calidifontibacillus Oryziterrae Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 6418–6427. [Google Scholar]
  400. Lin, P.; Yan, Z.; Yi, T.-H. Camelliibacillus Cellulosilyticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Cellulose-Degrading Bacterium Isolated from Tea. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1867–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  401. Peshkoff, M.A. Cytology, Karyology and Cycle of Development of New Microbes, Caryophanon Latum and Caryophanon Tenue. Compt. Rend.(Doklady) Acad. Sci. l’URRS 1939, 25, 244–247. [Google Scholar]
  402. Nakamura, K.; Haruta, S.; Ueno, S.; Ishii, M.; Yokota, A.; Igarashi, Y. Cerasibacillus Quisquiliarum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Semi-Continuous Decomposing System of Kitchen Refuse. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  403. Cao, W.-R.; Guo, L.-Y.; Du, Z.-J.; Das, A.; Saren, G.; Jiang, M.-Y.; Dunlap, C.A.; Rooney, A.P.; Yu, X.-K.; Li, T.-G. Chengkuizengella Sediminis Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov., Isolated from Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2672–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  404. Arora, P.K.; Chauhan, A.; Pant, B.; Korpole, S.; Mayilraj, S.; Jain, R.K. Chryseomicrobium Imtechense Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Member of the Family Planococcaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  405. Kim, W.; Traiwan, J.; Park, M.; Jung, M.Y.; Oh, S.; Yoon, J.; Sukhoom, A. Chungangia Koreensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Marine Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 8, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  406. Kämpfer, P.; Rosselló-Mora, R.; Falsen, E.; Busse, H.; Tindall, B.J. Cohnella Thermotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., and Classification of ‘Paenibacillus Hongkongensis’ as Cohnella Hongkongensis Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  407. Yu, Z.; Wen, J.; Yang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhou, S. Compostibacillus Humi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Member of the Family Bacillaceae, Isolated from Sludge Compost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 2, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  408. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Xue, H.; Chang, J.; Guo, L.; Yang, X. Corticicoccus Populi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Member of the Family Staphylococcaceae, Isolated from Symptomatic Bark of Populus × Euramericana Canker. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  409. Hatayama, K.; Kuno, T. Croceifilum Oryzae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Rice Paddy Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 11, 4061–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  410. Bhatt, H.; Begum, M.A.; Chintalapati, S.; Chintalapati, V.R.; Singh, S.P. Desertibacillus Haloalkaliphilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Saline Desert. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4435–4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  411. Yassin, A.F.; Hupfer, H.; Klenk, H.-P.; Siering, C. Desmospora Activa Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermoactinomycete Isolated from Sputum of a Patient with Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis, and Emended Description of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae Matsuo Et Al. 2006. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  412. Sorokin, D.Y.; Tourova, T.P.; Sukhacheva, M.V.; Muyzer, G. Desulfuribacillus Alkaliarsenatis Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov., a Deep-Lineage, Obligately Anaerobic, Dissimilatory Sulfur and Arsenate-Reducing, Haloalkaliphilic Representative of the Order Bacillales from Soda Lakes. Extremophiles 2012, 16, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  413. Seiler, H.; Wenning, M.; Scherer, S. Domibacillus Robiginosus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Pharmaceutical Clean Room. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 6, 2054–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  414. Watanabe, M.; Kojima, H.; Fukui, M. Proposal of Effusibacillus Lacus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., and Reclassification of Alicyclobacillus Pohliae as Effusibacillus Pohliae Comb. Nov. And Alicyclobacillus Consociatus as Effusibacillus Consociatus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 8, 2770–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  415. Collins, M.D.; Lund, B.M.; Farrow, J.A.E.; Schleifer, K.H. Chemotaxonomic Study of an Alkalophilic Bacterium, Exiguobacterium Aurantiacum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Microbiology 1983, 129, 2037–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  416. Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Xu, L.; Tindall, B.J. Tindall. Falsibacillus Pallidus to Replace the Homonym Bacillus Pallidus Zhou Et Al. 2008. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 3176–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  417. Glaeser, S.P.; Dott, W.; Busse, H.; Kämpfer, P. Fictibacillus Phosphorivorans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Proposal to Reclassify Bacillus Arsenicus, Bacillus Barbaricus, Bacillus Macauensis, Bacillus Nanhaiensis, Bacillus Rigui, Bacillus Solisalsi and Bacillus Gelatini in the Genus Fictibacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 8, 2934–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  418. Schlesner, H.; A Lawson, P.; Collins, M.D.; Weiss, N.; Wehmeyer, U.; Völker, H.; Thomm, M. Filobacillus Milensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Halophilic Spore-Forming Bacterium with Orn-D-Glu-Type Peptidoglycan. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  419. Saha, P.; Krishnamurthi, S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Sharma, R.; Chakrabarti, T. Fontibacillus Aquaticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Warm Spring. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  420. Berger, U. Neisseria Haemolysans (Thjotta and Boe, 1938): Studies on Its Place in the System. Z. Fur Hyg. Und Infekt. Med. Mikrobiol. Immunol. Und Virol. 1960, 146, 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  421. Nazina, T.N.; Tourova, T.P.; Poltaraus, A.B.; Novikova, E.V.; Grigoryan, A.; E Ivanova, A.; Lysenko, A.M.; Petrunyaka, V.V.; A Osipov, G.; Belyaev, S.S.; et al. Taxonomic Study of Aerobic Thermophilic Bacilli: Descriptions of Geobacillus Subterraneus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Geobacillus Uzenensis Sp. Nov. From Petroleum Reservoirs and Transfer of Bacillus Stearothermophilus, Bacillus Thermocatenulatus, Bacillus Thermoleovorans, Bacillus Kaustophilus, Bacillus Thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the New Combinations G. Stearothermophilus, G. Th. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 433–446. [Google Scholar]
  422. Echigo, A.; Minegishi, H.; Mizuki, T.; Kamekura, M.; Usami, R. Geomicrobium Halophilum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic and Alkaliphilic Bacterium Isolated from Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  423. Zhou, E.-M.; Yu, T.-T.; Liu, L.; Ming, H.; Yin, Y.-R.; Dong, L.; Tseng, M.; Nie, G.-X.; Li, W.-J. Geothermomicrobium Terrae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 9, 2998–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  424. Keita, M.B.; Padhmanabhan, R.; Caputo, A.; Robert, C.; Delaporte, E.; Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.-E.; Bittar, F. Non-Contiguous Finished Genome Sequence and Description of Gorillibacterium Massiliense Gen. Nov, Sp. Nov., a New Member of the Family Paenibacillaceae. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2014, 9, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  425. Wainø, M.; Tindall, B.J.; Schumann, P.; Ingvorsen, K. Gracilibacillus Gen. Nov., with Description of Gracilibacillus Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov.; Transfer of Bacillus Dipsosauri to Gracilibacillus Dipsosauri Comb. Nov., and Bacillus Salexigens to the Genus Salibacillus Gen. Nov., as Salibacillus Salexigens Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1999, 49, 821–831. [Google Scholar]
  426. Echigo, A.; Fukushima, T.; Mizuki, T.; Kamekura, M.; Usami, R. Halalkalibacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Moderately Halophilic and Alkaliphilic Bacterium Isolated from a Non-Saline Soil Sample in Japan. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  427. Spring, S.; Ludwig, W.; Marquez, M.C.; Ventosa, A.; Schleifer, K.-H. Halobacillus Gen. Nov., with Descriptions of Halobacillus Litoralis Sp. Nov. And Halobacillus Trueperi Sp. Nov., and Transfer of Sporosarcina Halophila to Halobacillus Halophilus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1996, 46, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  428. Ishikawa, M.; Nakajima, K.; Itamiya, Y.; Furukawa, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yamasato, K. Halolactibacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Halolactibacillus Miurensis Sp. Nov., Halophilic and Alkaliphilic Marine Lactic Acid Bacteria Constituting a Phylogenetic Lineage in Bacillus Rrna Group 1. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2427–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  429. Buss, S.N.; Cole, J.A.; Hannett, G.E.; Nazarian, E.J.; Nazarian, L.; Coorevits, A.; van Landschoot, A.; de Vos, P.; Schumann, P.; Musser, K.A.; et al. Hazenella Coriacea Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Clinical Specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 11, 4087–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  430. Kämpfer, P.; Glaeser, S.P.; Busse, H.-J. Transfer of Bacillus Schlegelii to a Novel Genus and Proposal of Hydrogenibacillus Schlegelii Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 5, 1723–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  431. Pal, Y.; Mayilraj, S.; Paul, M.; Schumann, P.; Krishnamurthi, S. Indiicoccus Explosivorum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from an Explosives Waste Contaminated Site. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 2555–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  432. Yoon, J.H.; Weiss, N.; Lee, K.C.; Lee, I.S.; Kang, K.H.; Park, Y.H. Jeotgalibacillus Alimentarius Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Bacterium Isolated from Jeotgal with L-Lysine in the Cell Wall, and Reclassification of Bacillus Marinus Rüger 1983. As Mmrinibacillus Marinus Gen Nov., Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 2087–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  433. Yoon, J.-H.; Lee, K.; Weiss, N.; Kang, K.H.; Park, Y. Jeotgalicoccus Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Jeotgalicoccus Psychrophilus Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Traditional Korean Fermented Seafood Jeotgal. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  434. Von Jan, M.; Riegger, N.; Pötter, G.; Schumann, P.; Verbarg, S.; Spröer, C.; Rohde, M.; Lauer, B.; Labeda, D.P.; Klenk, H.-P. Kroppenstedtia Eburnea Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermoactinomycete Isolated by Environmental Screening, and Emended Description of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae Matsuo Et Al. 2006 Emend. Yassin Et Al. 2009. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 2304–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  435. Trevisan, V. Caratteri Di Alcuni Nuovi Generi Di Batteriacee. Atti Della Accad. Fisio-Med.-Stat. Milano Ser. 1885, 4, 92–107. [Google Scholar]
  436. Klenk, H.-P.; Lapidus, A.; Chertkov, O.; Copeland, A.; Del Rio, T.G.; Nolan, M.; Lucas, S.; Chen, F.; Tice, H.; Cheng, J.-F.; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of the Thermophilic, Hydrogen-Oxidizing Bacillus Tusciae Type Strain (T2t) and Reclassification in the New Genus, Kyrpidia Gen. Nov. As Kyrpidia Tusciae Comb. Nov. And Emendation of the Family Alicyclobacillaceae Da Costa and Rainey, 2010. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2011, 5, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  437. Yoon, J.-H.; Kim, I.-G.; Shin, Y.-K.; Park, Y.-H. Proposal of the Genus Thermoactinomyces Sensu Stricto and Three New Genera, Laceyella, Thermoflavimicrobium and Seinonella, on the Basis of Phenotypic, Phylogenetic and Chemotaxonomic Analyses. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  438. Yoon, J.-H.; Kang, K.H.; Park, Y. Lentibacillus Salicampi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Salt Field in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 2043–2048. [Google Scholar]
  439. Yu, T.-T.; Zhang, B.-H.; Yao, J.-C.; Tang, S.-K.; Zhou, E.-M.; Yin, Y.-R.; Wei, D.-Q.; Ming, H.; Li, W.-J. Lihuaxuella Thermophila Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Geothermal Soil Sample in Tengchong, Yunnan, South-West China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 102, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  440. Pirie, J. The Genus Listerella. Pirie Sci. 1940, 91, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  441. Mahmoud, H.; Eapen, S.; Al-Bajjali, F.; Al-Qattan, A.; Jose, L. Litoribacterium Kuwaitense Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Kuwait Tidal Flat. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Chen, R.-W.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.-Q.; Wang, K.-X.; Li, C.; Long, L.-J. Longirhabdus Pacifica Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Sediment in the West Pacific Ocean. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 3362–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Liu, R.; Huang, Z.; Dong, C.; Shao, Z. Lottiidibacillus Patelloidae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Intestinal Tract of a Marine Limpet and Reclassification of Bacillus Taeanensis as Maribacillus Taeanensis Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  444. Ahmed, I.; Yokota, A.; Yamazoe, A.; Fujiwara, T. Proposal of Lysinibacillus Boronitolerans Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov., and Transfer of Bacillus Fusiformis to Lysinibacillus Fusiformis Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Sphaericus to Lysinibacillus Sphaericus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  445. Kloos, W.E.; Ballard, D.N.; George, C.G.; Webster, J.A.; Hubner, R.J.; Ludwig, W.; Schleifer, K.H.; Fiedler, F.; Schubert, K. Delimiting the Genus Staphylococcus through Description of Macrococcus Caseolyticus Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. And Macrococcus Equipercicus Sp. Nov., Macrococcus Bovicus Sp. Nov. And Macrococcus Carouselicus Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 859–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  446. Madhaiyan, M.; Wirth, J.S.; Saravanan, V.S. Phylogenomic Analyses of the Staphylococcaceae Family Suggest the Reclassification of Five Species within the Genus Staphylococcus as Heterotypic Synonyms, the Promotion of Five Subspecies to Novel Species, the Taxonomic Reassignment of Five Staphylococcus Species to Mammaliicoccus Gen. Nov., and the Formal Assignment of Nosocomiicoccus to the Family Staphylococcaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5926–5936. [Google Scholar]
  447. Guo, L.-Y.; Xia, J.; Ling, S.; Chen, G.; Du, Z. Marinicrinis Sediminis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Marine Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 3725–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  448. Li, J.; Zhang, G.-T.; Yang, J.; Tian, X.-P.; Wang, F.-Z.; Zhang, C.S.; Zhang, S.; Li, W.-J. Marininema Mesophilum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermoactinomycete Isolated from Deep Sea Sediment, and Emended Description of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 6, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  449. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Tian, X.; Zhang, S. Marinithermofilum Abyssi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Desmospora Profundinema Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Deep-Sea Sediment, and Emended Description of the Genus Desmosporayassin Et Al. 2009. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 8, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  450. Hao, M.V.; Kocur, M.; Komagata, K. Marinococcus Gen. Nov., a New Genus for Motile Cocci with Meso-Diaminopimelic Acid in the Cell Wall; and Marinococcus Albus Sp. Nov. And Marinococcus Halophilus (Novitsky and Kushner) Comb. Nov. J. Gener. Appl. Microbiol. 1984, 30, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  451. Matsuo, Y.; Katsuta, A.; Matsuda, S.; Shizuri, Y.; Yokota, A.; Kasai, H. Mechercharimyces Mesophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Mechercharimyces Asporophorigenens Sp. Nov., Antitumour Substance-Producing Marine Bacteria, and Description of Thermoactinomycetaceae Fam. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 2837–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  452. Addou, N.A.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Ben Hania, W.; Hacene, H.; Fauque, G.; Cayol, J.-L.; Fardeau, M.-L. Melghiribacillus Thermohalophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Filamentous, Endospore-Forming, Thermophilic and Halophilic Bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 4, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Addou, A.N.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Hacene, H.; Cayol, J.-L.; Fardeau, M.-L. Melghirimyces Algeriensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Member of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae, Isolated from a Salt Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 7, 1491–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  454. Khelifi, N.; Romdhane, E.B.; Hedi, A.; Postec, A.; Fardeau, M.; Hamdi, M.; Tholozan, J.; Ollivier, B.; Hirschler-Réa, A. Characterization of Microaerobacter Geothermalis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Microaerophilic, Nitrate- and Nitrite-Reducing Thermophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Terrestrial Hot Spring in Tunisia. Extremophiles 2010, 14, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  455. Echigo, A.; Minegishi, H.; Shimane, Y.; Kamekura, M.; Usami, R. Natribacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic and Alkalitolerant Bacterium Isolated from Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  456. Sorokin, I.D.; Zadorina, E.V.; Kravchenko, I.K.; Boulygina, E.S.; Tourova, T.P.; Sorokin, D.Y. Natronobacillus Azotifigens Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Anaerobic Diazotrophic Haloalkaliphile from Soda-Rich Habitats. Extremophiles 2008, 12, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  457. Alves, M.; Nogueira, C.; de Magalhaes-Sant’Ana, A.; Chung, A.P.; Morais, P.V.; da Costa, M.S. Nosocomiicoccus Ampullae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Surface of Bottles of Saline Solution Used in Wound Cleansing. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2939–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  458. Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Zhou, S. Novibacillus Thermophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Gram-Staining-Negative and Moderately Thermophilic Member of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 8, 2591–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  459. Lu, J.; Nogi, Y.; Takami, H. Oceanobacillus Iheyensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Deep-Sea Extremely Halotolerant and Alkaliphilic Species Isolated from a Depth of 1050 M on the Iheya Ridge. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 205, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  460. Mayr, R.; Busse, H.-J.; Worliczek, H.L.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Scherer, S. Ornithinibacillus Gen. Nov., with the Species Ornithinibacillus Bavariensis Sp. Nov. And Ornithinibacillus Californiensis Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  461. Collins, M.D.; Lawson, P.A.; Willems, A.; Córdoba, J.J.; Fernandez-Garayzabal, J.F.; Garcia, P.; Cai, J.; Hippe, H.; Farrow, J.A.E. The Phylogeny of the Genus Clostridium: Proposal of Five New Genera and Eleven New Species Combinations. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 812–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  462. Jiang, Z.; Xiao, M.; Yang, L.-L.; Zhi, X.-Y.; Li, W.-J. Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification within the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  463. Xu, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, H.; Tang, S.; Shen, B.; Sun, J. Description and Characterization of Three Endophytic Bacillaceae from the Halophyte Suaeda Salsa: Paenalkalicoccus Suaedae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Cytobacillus Suaedae Sp. Nov., and Bacillus Suaedae Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2022, 72, 5. [Google Scholar]
  464. Ash, C.; Priest, F.G.; Collins, M.D. Molecular Identification of Rrna Group 3 Bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) Using a Pcr Probe Test. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1993, 64, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  465. Krishnamurthi, S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Mayilraj, S.; Saha, P.; Schumann, P.; Chakrabarti, T. Description of Paenisporosarcina Quisquiliarum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., and Reclassification of Sporosarcina Macmurdoensis Reddy Et Al. 2003 as Paenisporosarcina Macmurdoensis Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1364–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  466. Frikha-Dammak, D.; Fardeau, M.-L.; Cayol, J.-L.; Ben Fguira-Fourati, L.; Najeh, S.; Ollivier, B.; Maalej, S. Paludifilum Halophilum Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermoactinomycete Isolated from Superficial Sediment of a Solar Saltern. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 5371–5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  467. Hwang, W.M.; Ko, Y.; Kang, K.; Ahn, T.-Y. Paludirhabdus Telluriireducens Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Paludirhabdus Pumila Sp. Nov., Isolated from Soil of a Mountain Wetland and Emended Description of Gorillibacterium Massiliense. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3040–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  468. Aliyu, H.; Lebre, P.; Blom, J.; Cowan, D.; de Maayer, P. Corrigendum to “Phylogenomic Re-Assessment of the Thermophilic Genus Geobacillus” [Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 39 (2016) 527–533]. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 41, 529–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  469. Ishikawa, M.; Ishizaki, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yamasato, K. Paraliobacillus Ryukyuensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Gram-Positive, Slightly Halophilic, Extremely Halotolerant, Facultative Anaerobe Isolated from a Decomposing Marine Alga. J. Gener. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  470. Metchnikoff, M.E. Pasteuria Ramosa Un Representant Des Bacteries a Division Longitudinale. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 1888, 2, 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  471. Nunes, I.; Tiago, I.; Pires, A.L.; da Costa, M.S.; Veríssimo, A. Paucisalibacillus Globulus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Gram-Positive Bacterium Isolated from Potting Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1841–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  472. Sultanpuram, V.R.; Mothe, T.; Chintalapati, S.; Chintalapati, V.R. Pelagirhabdus Alkalitolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Alkali-Tolerant and Thermotolerant Bacterium Isolated from Beach Sediment, and Reclassification of Amphibacillus Fermentum as Pelagirhabdus Fermentum Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  473. Tanasupawat, S.; Namwong, S.; Kudo, T.; Itoh, T. Piscibacillus Salipiscarius Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium from Fermented Fish (Pla-Ra) in Thailand. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1413–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  474. Hatayama, K.; Shoun, H.; Ueda, Y.; Nakamura, A. Planifilum Fimeticola Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Planifilum Fulgidum Sp. Nov., Novel Members of the Family ‘Thermoactinomycetaceae’ Isolated from Compost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2101–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  475. Migula, N. Arbeiten Aus Dem Bakteriologischen Institut Der Technischen Hochschule Zu. Karlsruhe 1894, 1, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  476. Tsubouchi, T.; Shimane, Y.; Mori, K.; Usui, K.; Hiraki, T.; Tame, A.; Uematsu, K.; Maruyama, T.; Hatada, Y. Polycladomyces Abyssicola Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermophilic Filamentous Bacterium Isolated from Hemipelagic Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 6, 1972–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  477. Hirota, K.; Okamoto, T.; Matsuyama, H.; Yumoto, I. Polygonibacillus Indicireducens Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Indigo-Reducing and Obligate Alkaliphile Isolated from Indigo Fermentation Liquor for Dyeing. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 4650–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  478. Lim, J.-M.; Jeon, C.O.; Song, S.M.; Kim, C.-J. Pontibacillus Chungwhensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Gram-Positive Bacterium from a Solar Saltern in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  479. Saha, T.; Ranjan, V.K.; Ganguli, S.; Thakur, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Barman, P.; Ghosh, W.; Chakraborty, R. Pradoshia Eiseniae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Spore-Forming Member of the Family Bacillaceae Capable of Assimilating 3-Nitropropionic Acid, Isolated from the Anterior Gut of the Earthworm Eisenia Fetida. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  480. Glaeser, S.P.; McInroy, J.A.; Busse, H.; Kämpfer, P. Pseudogracilibacillus Auburnensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Zea Mays. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 7, 2442–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  481. Kämpfer, P.; Glaeser, S.P.; Busse, H.-J.; McInroy, J.A.; Clermont, D.; Criscuolo, A. Pseudoneobacillus Rhizosphaerae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Maize Root Rhizosphere. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2022, 72, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  482. Krishnamurthi, S.; Ruckmani, A.; Pukall, R.; Chakrabarti, T. Psychrobacillus Gen. Nov. And Proposal for Reclassification of Bacillus Insolitus Larkin & Stokes, 1967, B. Psychrotolerans Abd-El Rahman Et Al., 2002 and B. Psychrodurans Abd-El Rahman Et Al., 2002 as Psychrobacillus Insolitus Comb. Nov., Psychrobacillus Psychrotolerans Comb. Nov. And Psychrobacillus Psychrodurans Comb. Nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  483. Wang, D.; Xiang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, J.; Hua, Z.; Niu, L.; Luo, L. Pueribacillus Theae Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Pu’er Tea. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 2878–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  484. Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, R.; Huang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, T.; Zhang, W.; et al. Radiobacillus Deserti Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Uv-Resistant Bacterium Isolated from Desert Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 6338–6347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  485. Kim, M.; Kim, T.; Ri, S.; Jiang, F.; Chang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ren, L.; Qiu, X.; Deng, S.; Fang, C.; et al. Risungbinella Pyongyangensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Mesophilic Member of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae Isolated from an Agricultural Soil Sample. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 8, 2726–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  486. Vaishampayan, P.; Miyashita, M.; Ohnishi, A.; Satomi, M.; Rooney, A.; La Duc, M.T.; Venkateswaran, K. Description of Rummeliibacillus Stabekisii Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Reclassification of Bacillus Pycnus Nakamura Et Al. 2002 as Rummeliibacillus Pycnus Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1094–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  487. Rivas, R.; García-Fraile, P.; Zurdo-Piñeiro, J.L.; Mateos, P.F.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Bedmar, E.J.; Sánchez-Raya, J.; Velázquez, E. Saccharibacillus Sacchari Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Sugar Cane. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1850–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  488. Nystrand, R. Saccharococcus Thermophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Isolated from Beet Sugar Extraction. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1984, 5, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  489. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, S.; Thirumala, M.; Sasikala, C.; Ramana, C.V. Salibacterium Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Bacterium Isolated from a Salt Pan, Reclassification of Bacillus Qingdaonensis as Salibacterium Qingdaonense Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Halochares as Salibacterium Halochares Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 11, 4270–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  490. Jang, J.-Y.; Oh, Y.J.; Lim, S.K.; Park, H.K.; Lee, C.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, M.-A.; Choi, H.-J. Salicibibacter Kimchii Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic and Alkalitolerant Bacterium in the Family Bacillaceae, Isolated from Kimchi. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 880–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  491. Yoon, J.-H.; Kang, S.; Oh, T. Reclassification of Marinococcus Albus Hao Et Al. 1985 as Salimicrobium Album Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Halophilus Ventosa Et Al. 1990 as Salimicrobium Halophilum Comb. Nov., and Description of Salimicrobium Luteum Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2406–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  492. Ren, P.-G.; Zhou, P.-J. Salinibacillus Aidingensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Salinibacillus Kushneri Sp. Nov., Moderately Halophilic Bacteria Isolated from a Neutral Saline Lake in Xin-Jiang, China. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 949–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  493. Ventosa, A.; Márquez, M.C.; Ruiz-Berraquero, F.; Kocur, M. Salinicoccus Roseus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Moderately Halophilic Gram-Positive Coccus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1990, 13, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  494. Zarparvar, P.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Nikou, M.M.; Schumann, P.; Ventosa, A. Salinithrix Halophila Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Halophilic Bacterium in the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 12, 4115–4119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  495. Sultanpuram, V.R.; Mothe, T. Salipaludibacillus Aurantiacus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. A Novel Alkali Tolerant Bacterium, Reclassification of Bacillus Agaradhaerens as Salipaludibacillus Agaradhaerens Comb. Nov. And Bacillus Neizhouensis as Salipaludibacillus Neizhouensis Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 2747–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  496. Albuquerque, L.; Tiago, I.; Rainey, F.A.; Taborda, M.; Nobre, M.F.; Verissimo, A.; Da Costa, M.S. Salirhabdus Euzebyi Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Gram-Positive, Halotolerant Bacterium Isolated from a Sea Salt Evaporation Pond. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1566–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  497. Jiang, F.; Cao, S.-J.; Li, Z.-H.; Fan, H.; Li, H.-F.; Liu, W.-J.; Yuan, H.-L. Salisediminibacterium Halotolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Halophilic Bacterium from Soda Lake Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2012, 62 Pt 9, 2127–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  498. Amoozegar, M.A.; Bagheri, M.; Didari, M.; Fazeli, S.A.S.; Schumann, P.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Saliterribacillus Persicus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Hypersaline Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 1, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  499. Carrasco, I.J.; Márquez, M.C.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Cowan, D.A.; Jones, B.E.; Grant, W.D.; Ventosa, A. Salsuginibacillus Kocurii Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium from Soda-Lake Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  500. Whitehead, T.R.; Johnson, C.N.; Patel, N.; Cotta, M.A.; Moore, E.; Lawson, P.A. Savagea Faecisuis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Tylosin- and Tetracycline-Resistant Bacterium Isolated from a Swine-Manure Storage Pit. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  501. Lee, S.D.; Lee, D.W. Scopulibacillus Darangshiensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Rock. J. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  502. Carrasco, I.J.; Márquez, M.C.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Cowan, D.A.; Jones, B.E.; Grant, W.D.; Ventosa, A. Sediminibacillus Halophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic, Gram-Positive Bacterium from a Hypersaline Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1961–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  503. Park, D.-J.; Dastager, S.; Lee, J.-C.; Yeo, S.-H.; Yoon, J.-H.; Kim, C.-J. Shimazuella Kribbensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Mesophilic Representative of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2660–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  504. Yang, G.; Zhou, S. Sinibacillus Soli Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Thermotolerant Member of the Family Bacillaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 5, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  505. Li, W.-J.; Zhi, X.; Euzéby, J.P. Proposal of Yaniellaceae Fam. Nov., Yaniella Gen. Nov. And Sinobaca Gen. Nov. As Replacements for the Illegitimate Prokaryotic Names Yaniaceae Li Et Al. 2005, Yania Li Et Al. 2004, Emend Li Et Al. 2005, and Sinococcus Li Et Al. 2006, Respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  506. Krishnamurthi, S.; Chakrabarti, T.; Stackebrandt, E. Re-Examination of the Taxonomic Position of Bacillus Silvestris Rheims Et Al. 1999 and Proposal to Transfer It to Solibacillus Gen. Nov. As Solibacillus Silvestris Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  507. Kitahara, K.; Suzuki, J. Sporolactobacillus Nov. Subgen. J. Gener. Appl. Microbiol. 1963, 9, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  508. Kluyver, A.J.; van Niel, C.B. Prospects for a Natural System of Classification of Bacteria. Zent. Fur Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infekt. Und Hyg. 1936, 94, 369–403. [Google Scholar]
  509. Rosenbach, A.J.F. Mikro-Organismen Bei Den Wund-Infections-Krankheiten Des Menschen; JF Bergmann: Paris, France, 1884. [Google Scholar]
  510. Wang, K.-X.; He, Y.-Q.; Chen, R.-W.; Li, C.; Tian, X.-P.; Long, L.-J. Staphylospora Marina Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Member of the Family Thermoactinomycetaceae, Isolated from a Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent in the Pacific Ocean. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1452–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  511. Wang, X.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y. Streptohalobacillus Salinus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic, Gram-Positive, Facultative Anaerobe Isolated from Subsurface Saline Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  512. Golovacheva, R.S.; Karavaĭko, G.I. Sulfobacillus, a New Genus of Thermophilic Sporulating Bacteria. Mikrobiologiia 1978, 47, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  513. Li, J.; Liu, J.; Shen, Y.; Ni, J. Swionibacillus Sediminis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Member of the Family Bacillaceae Isolated from Ocean Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 3440–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  514. Ren, P.-G.; Zhou, P.-J. Tenuibacillus Multivorans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Isolated from Saline Soil in Xin-Jiang, China. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  515. Slobodkina, G.B.; Panteleeva, A.N.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Kopitsyn, D.S.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A.; Slobodkin, A.I. Tepidibacillus Fermentans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov.: A Moderately Thermophilic Anaerobic and Microaerophilic Bacterium from an Underground Gas Storage. Extremophiles 2013, 17, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  516. An, S.-Y.; Asahara, M.; Goto, K.; Kasai, H.; Yokota, A.; Nam, Y.-D.; Chang, H.-W.; Park, J.R.; Kwon, H.-Y.; Quan, Z.-X.; et al. Terribacillus Saccharophilus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Terribacillus Halophilus Sp. Nov., Spore-Forming Bacteria Isolated from Field Soil in Japan. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  517. Prasirtsak, B.; Thongchul, N.; Tolieng, V.; Tanasupawat, S. Terrilactibacillus Laevilacticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  518. Ruiz-Romero, E.; Coutiño-Coutiño, M.d.; Valenzuela-Encinas, C.; López-Ramírez, M.P.; Marsch, R.; Dendooven, L. Texcoconibacillus Texcoconensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Alkalophilic and Halotolerant Bacteria Isolated from Soil of the Former Lake Texcoco (Mexico). Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 9, 3336–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  519. García, M.T.; Gallego, V.; Ventosa, A.; Mellado, E. Thalassobacillus Devorans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Moderately Halophilic, Phenol-Degrading, Gram-Positive Bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  520. Sultanpuram, V.R.; Mothe, T. Thalassorhabdus Alkalitolerans Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Novel Bacillaceae Member Isolated from Marine Sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 2969–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  521. Gössner, A.S.; Devereux, R.; Ohnemüller, N.; Acker, G.; Stackebrandt, E.; Drake, H.L. Thermicanus Aegyptius Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Oxic Soil, a Fermentative Microaerophile That Grows Commensally with the Thermophilic Acetogen Moorella Thermoacetica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 5124–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  522. Tsiklinsky, P. Sur Les Mucédinées Thermophiles. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 1899, 13, 500–505. [Google Scholar]
  523. Touzel, J.P.; O’Donohue, M.; Debeire, P.; Samain, E.; Breton, C. Thermobacillus Xylanilyticus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Aerobic Thermophilic Xylan-Degrading Bacterium Isolated from Farm Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  524. Cihan, A.C.; Koc, M.; Ozcan, B.; Tekin, N.; Cokmus, C. Thermolongibacillus Altinsuensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. And Thermolongibacillus Kozakliensis Sp. Nov., Aerobic, Thermophilic, Long Bacilli Isolated from Hot Springs. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2014, 64 Pt 1, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  525. Steven, B.; Chen, M.Q.; Greer, C.W.; Whyte, L.G.; Niederberger, T.D. Tumebacillus Permanentifrigoris Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., an Aerobic, Spore-Forming Bacterium Isolated from Canadian High Arctic Permafrost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1497–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  526. Fortina, M.G.; Pukall, R.; Schumann, P.; Mora, D.; Parini, C.; Manachini, P.L.; Stackebrandt, E. Ureibacillus Gen. Nov., a New Genus to Accommodate Bacillus Thermosphaericus (Andersson Et Al. 1995), Emendation of Ureibacillus Thermosphaericus and Description of Ureibacillus Terrenus Sp. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  527. Heyndrickx, M.; Lebbe, L.; Kersters, K.; De Vos, P.; Forsyth, G.; Logan, N.A. Virgibacillus: A New Genus to Accommodate Bacillus Pantothenticus (Proom and Knight 1950). Emended Description of Virgibacillus Pantothenticus. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  528. Albert, R.A.; Archambault, J.; Lempa, M.; Hurst, B.; Richardson, C.; Gruenloh, S.; Duran, M.; Worliczek, H.L.; Huber, B.E.; Rossello-Mora, R.; et al. Proposal of Viridibacillus Gen. Nov. And Reclassification of Bacillus Arvi, Bacillus Arenosi and Bacillus Neidei as Viridibacillus Arvi Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov., Viridibacillus Arenosi Comb. Nov. And Viridibacillus Neidei Comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2729–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  529. Haridon, S.L.; Miroshnichenko, M.L.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Tindall, B.J.; Spring, S.; Schumann, P.; Stackebrandt, E.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A.; Jeanthon, C. Vulcanibacillus Modesticaldus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Strictly Anaerobic, Nitrate-Reducing Bacterium from Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  530. Kukolya, J.; Bata-Vidács, I.; Luzics, S.; Tóth, E.; Kéki, Z.; Schumann, P.; Táncsics, A.; Nagy, I.; Olasz, F.; Tóth, Á. Xylanibacillus Composti Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Compost. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) The bibliometric map of Bacillales from 2000 to present, (b) their negative aspects on health, and (c) their positive aspects in the biodegradation and biorefinery applications.
Figure 1. (a) The bibliometric map of Bacillales from 2000 to present, (b) their negative aspects on health, and (c) their positive aspects in the biodegradation and biorefinery applications.
Microorganisms 10 02355 g001
Table 3. Industrial and biotechnological potential of some (poly)extremophilic genera in the order Bacillales.
Table 3. Industrial and biotechnological potential of some (poly)extremophilic genera in the order Bacillales.
Genus NameStrain NameType StrainImportant PropertiesPotential Applications(Poly)Extremophilic Features Reference
AliibacillusA. thermotolerans strain BM62YesAmmonia oxidationReduction of the air pollution caused by ammonia volatilization; Increase nitrate content in the compostModerately thermophile [294,295]
AlkalilactibacillusA. ikkensis strain GCM68YesProduction of a cold-active β-galactosidaseHeat-labile enzymatic digestions in genetic engineering; An affordable choice for laundry detergents; Food processing at low temperature (lactose hydrolyzing of milk)Alkaliphile
Halotolerant
Psychrophile
[296,297]
AllobacillusA. halotolerans strain MSP69NoProduction of an extracellular alkaline nucleaseBiocatalyst and flavor enhancer of fish sauceHalotolerant [298]
CaldalkalibacillusC. thermarum strain TA2.A1NoProduction of a thermostable laccase causing dimerization of a dimeric lignin model compound GGGEBiocatalyst for delignification and detoxification of lignocellulosic biomassThermoalkaliphile [299,300]
FilobacillusFilobacillus sp. RF2–5NoProduction of a halo- and thermostable serine proteinaseUseful for the degradation of fish protein during fermentation at high salt concentrations and might be useful for reduction of the fermentation periodModerately halophile [301]
OceanobacillusOceanobacillus oncorhynchi subsp. incaldaniensis strain 20AGYesProduction of a novel thermo-alkali stable catalase–peroxidaseUseful for phenol resin synthesis; Bioremediation of anilines and phenols; Lignin degradation in paper industryHalophile
Alkalitolerant
[302,303]
Oceanobacillus sp. PUMB02NoProduction of a halotolerant thermostable lipasePotential utility in inhibiting biofilm formation in a food processing environment [304]
ParalkalibacillusParalkalibacillus indicireducens strain Bps-1YesIndigo reductionPotential use in indigo dying industryObligately alkaliphile
Halotolerant
[305]
VirgibacillusVirgibacillus sp. SK37NoNaCl-activated ProteinasePotential starter to improve fish sauce qualityModerately halophile [306,307,308]
LaceyellaLaceyella sacchari strain LP175NoThermostable amylaseRaw starch industry; Bioethanol productionThermophile [309]
Laceyella putida strain JAM FM3001NoHighly thermostable and surfactant-activated chitinasePotential applications in waste management; Biocontrol agent; Pharmaceutical industry [310]
HalolactibacillusHalolactibacillus alkaliphilus MSRD1NoAntibacterial activity of red pigmentPharmaceutical industryHalotolerant [311]
Halolactibacillus miurensis strain SEEN MKU3NoProduction of exopolysaccharides with antioxidant activitiesPotential applications in functional foods; Cosmetic industry; Pharmaceutical industry [312]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Harirchi, S.; Sar, T.; Ramezani, M.; Aliyu, H.; Etemadifar, Z.; Nojoumi, S.A.; Yazdian, F.; Awasthi, M.K.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Bacillales: From Taxonomy to Biotechnological and Industrial Perspectives. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2355. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122355

AMA Style

Harirchi S, Sar T, Ramezani M, Aliyu H, Etemadifar Z, Nojoumi SA, Yazdian F, Awasthi MK, Taherzadeh MJ. Bacillales: From Taxonomy to Biotechnological and Industrial Perspectives. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12):2355. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harirchi, Sharareh, Taner Sar, Mohaddaseh Ramezani, Habibu Aliyu, Zahra Etemadifar, Seyed Ali Nojoumi, Fatemeh Yazdian, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, and Mohammad J. Taherzadeh. 2022. "Bacillales: From Taxonomy to Biotechnological and Industrial Perspectives" Microorganisms 10, no. 12: 2355. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop