Next Article in Journal
Recent Progress of Chitosan and Chitosan Derivatives-Based Nanoparticles: Pharmaceutical Perspectives of Oral Insulin Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Brain-Targeted Delivery of Pre-miR-29b Using Lactoferrin-Stearic Acid-Modified-Chitosan/Polyethyleneimine Polyplexes
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment Response and Remission Using an Ensemble Machine Learning Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marine Natural Products, Multitarget Therapy and Repurposed Agents in Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/ph13100306
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dimethyl Fumarate and Its Esters: A Drug with Broad Clinical Utility?

by
Stephanie Kourakis
1,
Cara A. Timpani
2,3,
Judy B. de Haan
4,5,
Nuri Gueven
6,
Dirk Fischer
7 and
Emma Rybalka
2,3,*
1
College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
2
Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
3
Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science, Victoria University, St Albans, VIC 3021, Australia
4
Oxidative Stress Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Basic Science Domain, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
5
Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia
6
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia
7
Division of Developmental- and Neuropediatrics, University Children’s Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(10), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100306
Submission received: 27 September 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 / Published: 13 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Agents for Neurological Disorders)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) are small molecules with anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating effects. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is the best characterised FAE and is approved and registered for the treatment of psoriasis and Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). Psoriasis and RRMS share an immune-mediated aetiology, driven by severe inflammation and oxidative stress. DMF, as well as monomethyl fumarate and diroximel fumarate, are commonly prescribed first-line agents with favourable safety and efficacy profiles. The potential benefits of FAEs against other diseases that appear pathogenically different but share the pathologies of oxidative stress and inflammation are currently investigated.

1. Introduction

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a methyl ester of fumaric acid (FA) (i.e., an FA ester (FAE)) registered for the treatment of relapsing forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) [1,2] and psoriasis [3,4]. As an α, β-unsaturated carboxylic ester generated by reacting FA with methanol in the presence of sulfuric acid, DMF notably stimulates mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle activity and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production [5]. Whilst FA alone is poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, DMF and its active metabolite monomethyl fumarate (MMF) to which it is almost entirely converted in the gut [6], have robust bioavailability (for pharmacokinetics data see [6]) and exert beneficial effects in diseases characterised by inflammation [7,8,9], neurodegeneration [10,11] and toxic oxidative stress [9,12]. A modernized version of DMF has recently been developed in diroximel fumarate (DRF), which has comparable efficacy against MS to DMF but with fewer side effects [13].
The therapeutic efficacy of FAEs appears to be mediated through the activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) transcriptional pathway [14,15,16] as well as interaction with the anti-inflammatory hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCAR2) [17,18]. The Nrf2 pathway is considered a critical cellular defence system that responds to potentially toxic stimuli via the upregulation of antioxidant and Phase II cytoprotective response genes [19,20]. A number of Nrf2 inducing drugs have been developed and tested in clinical [1,21,22,23,24] and pre-clinical [25,26,27,28,29] studies over the past decade and many have demonstrated potential for clinical progression. These studies highlight the broad therapeutic utility of targeted Nrf2 activation against a variety of diseases (summarised in Table 1). In addition to the activation of Nrf2, MMF also interacts with HCAR2, which strongly modulates anti-inflammatory activity, particularly in primary and accessory immune cells [30]. By reversing mitochondrial TCA cycle flux, there is novel evidence that FAEs might exert at least a portion of their immunomodulatory action through generating succinyl-carnitine esters or other metabolites as well [31,32]. The collective Nrf2-inducing and immuno-modulatory properties of DMF and other FAEs, have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy across multiple body systems such as the central nervous [10,33], cardiovascular [34,35], gastrointestinal [7,36,37], immune [5,38] and integumentary [39,40] systems. Thus, the prospective clinical impact of DMF and its esters is extensive.
This review discusses the efficacy and side-effect profiles of FAEs with reference to reported data from completed and ongoing clinical and pre-clinical trials and postulates new clinical indications.

2. Approved Indications for Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF)

Oxidative stress occurs when oxidant production (i.e., reactive oxygen species (ROS)) exceeds the capacity of endogenous antioxidants to scavenge and detoxify ROS, and generally leads to oxidative cellular damage [41,42]. ROS can oxidise biomolecules and structurally modify proteins and DNA to trigger signalling cascades that both cause and progress tissue damage and inflammation [41]. Although inflammation is an ostensibly beneficial response to tissue injury in which immune cells are recruited to digest necrotic tissue and promote new tissue regeneration, chronic inflammation potentiates oxidative stress and tissue injury through persistent inflammatory cytokine release [43]. In response to cytokines, immune cells generate more ROS, escalating oxidative stress and insult to tissues [43]. This paradoxical interrelation between oxidative stress and inflammation has been linked to many chronic inflammatory diseases including psoriasis and MS. The efficacy of FAEs is proposed to be based on their dual antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, which justifies the global approval of FAE drugs for both indications.

2.1. DMF for Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a non-contagious, chronic, multi-system inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent episodes of red, scaly skin plaques that are distinctively demarcated from the normal underlying skin [44]. DMF and its utility as a treatment for psoriasis were conceptualised in the late 1950s based on the inaccurate assumption that skin disease was initiated by a TCA cycle biochemical defect and that exogenous administration of FA, an intermediate TCA cycle product, could re-establish its balance [45]. Whilst free FA is poorly absorbed by the GI tract [46], Altmeyer et al. [47] demonstrated that its ester derivatives, MMF and DMF, were beneficial to treat psoriasis in 100 patients in a randomised double-blind study. Following this, an FA mixture comprised largely of DMF (60%) and three ethyl hydrogen fumarates (calcium, magnesium and zinc salts of monoethyl fumarate (MEF)) were approved for the treatment of moderate and severe forms of psoriasis under the brand name Fumaderm® [48]. DMF was ultimately discovered to be the bioactive component in the preparation [49] since MEF salts alone exerted no significant clinical efficacy [50]. More recently, a DMF-only formulation, Skilarence®, was approved by the European Medicines Agency as it provided comparable efficacy and safety profiles to that of Fumaderm® in a Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 671 patients (NCT01726933) [40]. While the aetiology of psoriasis is still not fully elucidated, it is classified as an immune-mediated disorder owing to a combination of genetic, immunological and environmental factors [51]. As the complex interaction between these three immunomodulatory factors has become better characterised [52,53,54], the primary mode of action (MOA) of DMF was established as immunomodulation [55,56]. In light of this, as well as DMF’s robust efficacy [39,40] and acceptable safety [39,57] profile, the prospect of utilising FAEs for other diseases that share an immune-mediated origin with psoriasis, such as MS, was proposed.

2.2. DMF for Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Owing to their success in treating psoriasis, Schilling et al. [58] investigated FAEs in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse model, which reproduces several of the typical features of human MS. This study revealed therapeutic effects of FAEs prompting further investigation and clinical studies with DMF, specifically in MS patients. MS is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system characterised by dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune responses [59]. Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) is the most common MS subtype, characterised as a clear increase in new or existing neurological symptoms followed by periods of incomplete or complete recovery, termed remissions. The first exploratory clinical trial of FAE in RRMS took place in 2006 where Fumaderm® was given to 10 patients [60]. Although this study was a small, open-label pilot study, FAEs induced promising improvements in both radiological and clinical parameters and paved the way for continuing clinical trials with DMF. BG-12, an orally administered, enteric-coated micro tablet slow-release preparation of DMF [38] (marketed as Tecfidera®), was formulated to reduce GI-related side effects including diarrhoea and nausea and trialled in one Phase II [2] and two subsequent Phase III trials [1,61]. In 2008, the Phase IIb clinical trial (NCT00168701) established efficacy and safety of several different dosages of the delayed release formulation [2]. BG-12 reduced the number of new lesions as well as decreased annualised relapse rates compared to the placebo [2]. These favourable results prompted further long-term Phase III studies in a larger group of patients with RRMS. In 2012, the Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in RRMS (DEFINE; NCT00420212) [1] and Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in RRMS (CONFIRM; NCT00451451) [61] studies were published. Over their 2-year duration, these multicentre, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trials proved that daily treatment of BG-12 decreased the rate of disease progression, number of lesions (observed via magnetic resonance imaging) and significantly reduced the proportion of relapsing patients [1,61]. Although the safety and tolerability of DMF were deemed acceptable in these trials, the incidence of side effects such as flushing, as well as GI events including diarrhoea, upper abdominal pain, vomiting and nausea, were commonly reported by patients in the first month of treatment. Thereafter, the number of side effects reported by patients reduced significantly [62]. While flushing is associated with increased prostaglandin production through key MOA agonism of HCAR2, GI symptoms are the primary reason for treatment discontinuation [63,64] and attributable to the action of major metabolite methanol on small intestine mucosa [63]. Progress toward improved formulations/molecules to minimise GI-related side effects, whilst maintaining the efficacy of DMF have recently been made.
Diroximel fumarate (DRF) (marketed as Vumerity®), is a novel orally administered FAE, approved in late 2019 for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. Approval was based on data from an open-label, Phase III study (NCT02634307) that demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy [63] in addition to another study (NCT03093324) that compared Vumerity® against Tecfidera® [13]. The proposed mechanism through which DRF could improve gut tolerability compared to DMF was through substitution of DMF’s methanol leaving group with inert 2-hydroxyethyl succinimide (HES) [63]. Upon oral administration, DMF is cleaved by gut esterases to yield the major metabolites MMF and methanol; whereas DRF undergoes esterase cleavage to yield major metabolites MMF and HES as well as minor metabolites RDC-8439 and methanol [63]. Otherwise, DRF shares a comparable pharmacokinetic profile to DMF [65]. DRF was shown to be well-tolerated with fewer GI reactions in comparison to DMF in the study [13]. At therapeutic doses, DRF and DMF yielded bioequivalent production of the active metabolite MMF, which has been proposed to exert most of the efficacy imparted by FAEs in MS patients [13]. Another DMF bioequivalent, Bafiertam™ (MMF) was recently approved (April 2020) for RRMS. Since a lower dose of Bafiertam™ is required compared to Tecfidera® to produce equivalent plasma MMF levels, reduced adverse effects have been purported. Although Bafiertam™ was not independently evaluated in clinical trials with MS patients, it has been approved based on DMF’s efficacy in RRMS. It is possible that FAEs might also be useful to treat diseases that, like psoriasis and MS, are associated with oxidative stress and/or inflammation: this has been an area of intense clinical and pre-clinical research over the past decade.

3. Clinical Trials (Novel Indications)

FAEs including DMF/MMF and DRF proved to be valuable therapeutics against psoriasis and MS. In particular, DMF was shown to activate the intrinsic cellular response to oxidative stress [66] and counteract cytotoxic insult [67] to promote cell survival. For these reasons, DMF and its esters are purported to afford therapeutic benefits in other diseases complicated by oxidative stress and inflammation, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS is a neurodegenerative, inflammatory disorder that results in progressive paralysis and death from respiratory failure within 2–3 years [68]. Although the aetiology of ALS lies in the progressive degeneration of motor neurons, innate immune responsivity has been implicated in the initiation and progression of the disease [69,70]. Reduced levels of regulatory T cells in conjunction with increased macrophage activation [70] and pro-inflammatory effector T cells and cytokines [71] are indicators of rapid disease progression in ALS. Tecfidera® (DMF) increased the ratio of anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory T-cell subsets [72,73] and reduced pro-inflammatory T cells in RRMS [72], resulting in enhanced anti-inflammatory activity and neuroprotection. Based on these encouraging results, Vucic et al. (2020) are currently undertaking a Phase II randomised, double blind clinical trial (ACTRN12618000534280) to assess the efficacy and safety of Tecfidera® in patients with ALS. The trial commenced in 2018 with anticipated results in late 2020 or early 2021 [74].
A Phase II clinical trial for Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) is also currently underway with a projected end date of late 2021 (NCT02546440). CTCLs are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas characterised by cutaneous infiltration of malignant monoclonal T lymphocytes [75]. Previous pre-clinical trials proposed that DMF inhibits tumour growth and distant metastasis, and restores sensitivity of CTCL cells towards apoptosis by down-regulating elevated nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) [76]. NF-κB is a transcription factor protein complex involved in inflammation, immune responsiveness and apoptosis [77]. Since apoptosis re-sensitisation was only detected in tumour cells (and not healthy lymphocytes) [76], DMF could be an attractive disease modifying co-treatment candidate in CTCL due to its inherent lack of toxicity and favourable safety profile.
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that involves collapse of the upper airway during sleep, which results in low blood oxygen levels and sleep disruption when left untreated. OSA increases the risk of cardiovascular-related complications including high blood pressure, heart disease and stroke [78]. OSA has been consistently linked to inflammation, with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in OSA patients [79,80,81], where systemic hyperinflammation caused by other complications increases the severity of OSA [82]. Intermittent hypoxia associated with OSA is acknowledged as a driver of inflammation [83,84], and at least partially mediated by the activation of NF-κB [85]. FAEs inhibit NF-κB through activation of both Nrf2 and HCAR2, and consequently, the secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules [17]. Studies have revealed a formal association between the use of immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive agents and reduced OSA severity and/or frequency [82,86]. As such, a Phase II randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial was initiated (NCT02438137) to determine whether DMF was effective for the treatment of OSA. In this yet peer-reviewed study, DMF attenuated disease severity suggesting that OSA may be responsive to agents that regulate immune signalling pathways. Suppression of systemic inflammation via NF-κB reduction was hypothesised as the likely mediator of DMF’s efficacy in OSA.
Whilst DMF demonstrated efficacy in numerous clinical trials, it is important to highlight that some studies failed to show therapeutic efficacy or were abandoned or terminated/withdrawn. A Phase II study that commenced in 2008 trialled DMF (BG-12) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Although DMF activated the Nrf2 pathway eliciting a downward trend for some inflammatory markers and cytokines, it did not significantly modify the pre-defined end-point outcome measures (unpublished clinical trial data; NCT00810836). Another study that investigated the therapeutic potential of DMF in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (NCT02981082) was terminated due to low recruitment numbers. Similarly, due to lack of funding, a trial investigating the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DMF in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, was terminated in 2019. Other completed studies include the use of DMF in glioblastoma multiforme (NCT02337426) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (NCT01352988) completed in 2017 and 2014, respectively, with no results published.

4. Pre-Clinical Trials

Recently, Jadeja et al. [87] published a detailed overview of the pre-clinical literature evaluating FAEs for the prevention and treatment of diseases in which oxidative stress and/or inflammation are prominent (other than psoriasis and MS). As such, the pre-clinical studies of FAE will only be briefly discussed here.

4.1. GI/Digestive Tract Indications

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a collection of disorders that are characterised by dysfunction of mucosal immune response and abnormal cytokine production, which contributes to chronic inflammation in the digestive tract [7]. Although there is a range of treatment options available for diseases associated with IBD, given the complex aetiology, the demand for novel and/or improved therapeutic strategies remains high. Since there is a well-established association between IBD development/progression and inflammation, several groups have sought to investigate the efficacy of FAE in the treatment of GI-associated disorders. In most instances, experimental rodent models of colitis have been used to demonstrate the efficacy of DMF for mitigating colon injury, pro-inflammatory cytokine and adhesion molecule production and NF-κB signalling [7]. Furthermore, DMF exerts efficacy in IBD through induction of the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response involving increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression to reduce lipid peroxidation [7,36]. MMF has also been shown to suppress or completely prevent gastric ulceration in rats [88] highlighting FAEs as potent gastro-protective agents. Together, studies like these surprisingly indicate that DMF/MMF and other FAEs may be of clinical benefit for GI indications, despite themselves eliciting GI side effects particularly in the initial stages of treatment [2,57,63,89]. The beneficial effects of FAEs appear to also extend beyond the GI tract. Both MMF [90] and DMF [91] exhibited hepatoprotective effects in various models of hepatotoxicity by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Larger studies to further develop/refine the efficacy of FAE formulations in GI and hepatic conditions are warranted to establish their clinical potential.

4.2. Neurological Indications

The brain is especially sensitive to perturbations caused by oxidative and/or inflammatory stress. In fact, these factors are central to the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [33,92], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [93], Huntington’s disease (HD) and intracerebral haemorrhage (stroke) [94]. Concomitantly, these diseases are also underscored by pathological mitochondria and perturbations in energy homeostasis (reviewed in [95,96]). Therefore, therapies that enhance anti-oxidative potential, counter stressors and promote mitochondrial pool maintenance and function may be of clinical value. FAE can induce Nrf2 signalling and cellular defence machinery against oxidative stress [67], which should therefore provide some neuroprotection in disorders such as AD, PD and HD. In mouse models of these diseases, DMF reduced damage and degeneration to preserve neuronal populations [10,33,97,98] by upregulating Nrf2-dependent antioxidant genes [10,97] and suppressing NF-κB-mediated inflammation [10,69,70,97]. These molecular adaptations attenuated clinical symptoms including motor impairment [69], long-term memory deficits [70] and increased overall survival rates [69]. One downstream response to Nrf2 activation is mitochondrial biogenesis through key regulators, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1α) and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) [99]. Pharmacological up-regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and turnover has shown therapeutic value in mouse models of PD and HD [95] and mitochondrial function stimulants have shown similar pre-clinical benefits in AD [96]. Since DMF can stimulate mitochondrial substrate flux, anaplerosis and energy production during its endpoint metabolism (i.e., fumarate) in the mitochondrial TCA cycle, as well as activate Nrf2, it could exert additional therapeutic activity in this regard. DMF was also beneficial in ischemia-related pathogenesis such as that elicited through stroke, where neuroprotection and neuronal survival can be enhanced to avert ischemic injury. In mouse [100,101] and rat [102] models of stroke, DMF reduced ischemia-associated inflammation [100,101,102], stabilised the blood brain barrier [100,101], prevented cerebral oedema [71,101,102], enhanced neurological recovery [71,101,102] and importantly, ameliorated neurological deficits and improved hematoma resolution even when administered as late as 24 h after the haemorrhage event [102]. These pre-clinical studies highlight the clinical potential for FAEs to be repurposed for neurodegenerative and ischemia-related disorders of the brain.

4.3. Cancer Related Indications

Accumulating evidence suggest that DMF exerts anti-tumorigenic properties in several types of cancers. DMF was first implicated in the inhibition of cancer cell growth in the early 2000s when its effect on melanoma growth and metastasis was evaluated in animal models and human melanoma cell lines [103]. This work was supported by the discovery that DMF reduces cell invasion and metastasis of melanoma cells by inhibiting pro-metastatic proteases such as the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [104,105], as well as by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle inhibition [105,106]. More recently, Takeda et al. [105] proposed that DMF prolongs survival in melanoma mouse models and exerts its anti-metastatic efficacy through suppression of nuclear translocation of NF-κB. NF-κB is constitutively active in several types of cancer [107,108,109]. Especially in breast cancer, NF-κB signalling enhances tumour cell survival, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and resistance to anti-cancer therapy [110,111]. NF-κB is thus a prognostic indicator of aggressive breast cancers [111]. Consistent with its anti-NF-κB activity, DMF inhibited mammosphere formation (a functional measure of cancer stem cell properties), cell proliferation and xenograft tumour growth [110], providing proof-of-concept evidence for the clinical potential of DMF in breast cancer therapy. Other cancer cell lines, including colorectal cancer [37], cervical cancer [112], lung adenocarcinoma [113] and pancreatic carcinoma [113] are also sensitive to DMF-induced cytotoxicity. These studies suggest that FAE could be broadly utilised as an anti-cancer therapy.

4.4. Cardiovascular Indications

The role of oxidative stress in the aetiology of vasculopathy and hypertension is well-documented [114]. Excessive ROS production diminishes nitric oxide bioavailability, leading to increased vasoconstriction and damage to the vasculature by inducing inflammation and fibrosis [115]. Although the specific MOA remains to be determined, the cardioprotective effect of fumarate has been associated with its metabolism to succinate through both oxidative and reductive pathways. This was confirmed by Laplante et al. [116] where metabolic fluxes in fumarate-perfused rat hearts were studied. Since then, some evidence has emerged to suggest that DMF may be useful for cardiovascular related indications. Grzegorzewska et al. [34] demonstrated in mouse models of pulmonary arterial hypertension and lung fibrosis that DMF reduced inflammation, oxidative damage and fibrosis. DMF also attenuated abnormal remodelling after acute vascular injury in rat carotid arteries [35]. Whilst these studies suggest that FAE might be beneficial for patients with vascular diseases, more research is warranted to establish DMF efficacy for these indications.

5. Novel Applications

The combined Nrf2-inducing and immune-modulatory properties of FAE and their robust bioavailability have enabled drugs such as DMF and MMF to be versatile across pathologies in a range of body systems (summarised in Figure 1). Thus, the potential clinical impact of FAE therapy is high and particularly broad. The evidence provided in this review, as well as by others [45,49,87], compellingly demonstrates that, since oxidative stress and inflammation are inextricably linked, FAEs have the potential to positively influence diseases characterised by both of these factors. This could include chronic and progressive neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy; mitochondrial diseases such as Friedreichs’s Ataxia as well as other diseases featuring mitochondrial dysfunction; respiratory-related diseases including novel coronavirus (COVID-19) since it has recently been proposed that severely affected patients manifest a cytokine storm syndrome [117] and treatment of hyperinflammation may reduce mortality rate; renal diseases including glomerulonephritis and; metabolic disorders such as diabetes. Less potent Nrf2 activators (sulforaphane [26,118], curcumin [25,119,120] and resveratrol [27,28,121]) have been developed, tested and demonstrated for use in some of these indications, however do not appear to exert the same influences on innate and adaptive immunity as FAEs. Since FAEs such as DMF are approved, affordable, widely available and clinically well characterised, they are appealing candidates for expanded clinical development. As such, exploratory trials of FAE therapies in a variety of other diseases is warranted (Figure 1).

6. Conclusions

FAEs are currently approved for several indications including psoriasis and RRMS, due to their anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and immunomodulatory properties and are investigated for many other indications. FAEs are drugs with broad clinical utility and favourable safety profiles, which could be quickly expanded to treat other diseases with unmet clinical needs through drug repurposing strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R. and C.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K., E.R. and C.T.; writing—review and editing, S.K., C.A.T., J.B.d.H., N.G., D.F.; visualization, E.R., C.A.T., D.F., N.G.; supervision, E.R., and D.F.; project administration, E.R. and D.F.; funding acquisition, E.R. and D.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding (funding was provided by Victoria University and University Children’s Hospital Basel commercialization partnership scheme).

Conflicts of Interest

E.R. and N.G. are scientific consultants to Santhera Pharmaceuticals. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gold, R.; Kappos, L.; Arnold, D.L.; Bar-Or, A.; Giovannoni, G.; Selmaj, K.W.; Tornatore, C.; Sweetser, M.T.; Yang, M.; Sheikh, S.I.; et al. Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Oral BG-12 for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. New Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kappos, L.; Gold, R.; Miller, D.H.; MacManus, D.G.; Havrdova, E.; Limmroth, V.; Polman, C.H.; Schmierer, K.; A Yousry, T.; Yang, M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet 2008, 372, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reszke, R.; Szepietowski, J.C. A safety evaluation of dimethyl fumarate in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2020, 19, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mrowietz, U.; Altmeyer, P.; Bieber, T.; Röcken, M.; Schopf, R.E.; Sterry, W. Treatment of psoriasis with fumaric acid esters (Fumaderm®). J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2007, 5, 716–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Landeck, L.; Asadullah, K.; Amasuno, A.; Pau-Charles, I.; Mrowietz, U. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs. monoethyl fumarate (MEF) salts for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: A review of clinical data. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2018, 310, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sheikh, S.I.; Nestorov, I.; Russell, H.; O’Gorman, J.; Huang, R.; Milne, G.L.; Scannevin, R.H.; Novas, M.; Dawson, K.T. Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Delayed-Release Dimethyl Fumarate Administered With and Without Aspirin in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Ther. 2013, 35, 1582–1594.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Casili, G.; Cordaro, M.; Impellizzeri, D.; Bruschetta, G.; Paterniti, I.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. Dimethyl Fumarate Reduces Inflammatory Responses in Experimental Colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2015, 10, 472–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krishnamoorthy, S.; Pace, B.S.; Gupta, D.; Sturtevant, S.; Li, B.; Makala, L.; Brittain, J.; Moore, N.; Vieira, B.F.; Thullen, T.; et al. Dimethyl fumarate increases fetal hemoglobin, provides heme detoxification, and corrects anemia in sickle cell disease. JCI Insight 2017, 2, 96409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Belcher, J.D.; Chen, C.; Nguyen, J.; Zhang, P.; Abdulla, F.; Nguyen, P.; Killeen, T.; Xu, P.; O’Sullivan, G.; Nath, K.A.; et al. Control of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Sickle Cell Disease with the Nrf2 Activator Dimethyl Fumarate. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 26, 748–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Campolo, M.; Casili, G.; Biundo, F.; Crupi, R.; Cordaro, M.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. The Neuroprotective Effect of Dimethyl Fumarate in an MPTP-Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease: Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species/Nuclear Factor-κB/Nuclear Transcription Factor Related to NF-E2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 27, 453–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cerina, M.; Narayanan, V.; Delank, A.; Meuth, P.; Graebenitz, S.; Göbel, K.; Herrmann, A.M.; Albrecht, S.; Daldrup, T.; Seidenbecher, T.; et al. Protective potential of dimethyl fumarate in a mouse model of thalamocortical demyelination. Brain Struct. Funct. 2018, 223, 3091–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akino, N.; Wada-Hiraike, O.; Isono, W.; Terao, H.; Honjo, H.; Miyamoto, Y.; Tanikawa, M.; Sone, K.; Hirano, M.; Harada, M.; et al. Activation of Nrf2/Keap1 pathway by oral Dimethylfumarate administration alleviates oxidative stress and age-associated infertility might be delayed in the mouse ovary. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2019, 17, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naismith, R.T.; The EVOLVE-MS-2 Study Group; Wundes, A.; Ziemssen, T.; Jasinska, E.; Freedman, M.S.; Lembo, A.J.; Selmaj, K.; Bidollari, I.; Chen, H.; et al. Diroximel Fumarate Demonstrates an Improved Gastrointestinal Tolerability Profile Compared with Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Results from the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 Study. CNS Drugs 2020, 34, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bomprezzi, R. Dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: An overview. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2015, 8, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yadav, S.K.; Soin, D.; Ito, K.; Dhib-Jalbut, S. Insight into the mechanism of action of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 97, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ohl, K.; Tenbrock, K.; Kipp, M. Oxidative stress in multiple sclerosis: Central and peripheral mode of action. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 277, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parodi, B.; Rossi, S.; Morando, S.; Cordano, C.; Bragoni, A.; Motta, C.; Usai, C.; Wipke, B.T.; Scannevin, R.H.; Mancardi, G.L.; et al. Fumarates modulate microglia activation through a novel HCAR2 signaling pathway and rescue synaptic dysregulation in inflamed CNS. Acta Neuropathol. 2015, 130, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, H.; Assmann, J.C.; Krenz, A.; Rahman, M.; Grimm, M.; Karsten, C.M.; Köhl, J.; Offermanns, S.; Wettschureck, N.; Schwaninger, M. Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 mediates dimethyl fumarate’s protective effect in EAE. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2188–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mathers, J.; Fraser, J.A.; McMahon, M.; Saunders, R.D.C.; Hayes, J.D.; McLellan, L.I. Antioxidant and cytoprotective responses to redox stress. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 2004, 71, 157–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baird, L.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T. The cytoprotective role of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85, 241–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McDermott, M.M.; Leeuwenburgh, C.; Guralnik, J.M.; Tian, L.; Sufit, R.; Zhao, L.; Criqui, M.H.; Kibbe, M.R.; Stein, J.H.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; et al. Effect of Resveratrol on Walking Performance in Older People With Peripheral Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ringman, J.M.; Frautschy, S.A.; Teng, E.; Begum, A.N.; Bardens, J.; Beigi, M.; Gylys, K.H.; Badmaev, V.; Heath, D.D.; Apostolova, L.G.; et al. Oral curcumin for Alzheimer’s disease: Tolerability and efficacy in a 24-week randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2012, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chin, M.P.; Bakris, G.L.; Block, G.A.; Chertow, G.M.; Goldsberry, A.; Inker, L.A.; Heerspink, H.J.; O’Grady, M.; Pergola, P.E.; Wanner, C.; et al. Bardoxolone Methyl Improves Kidney Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 and Type 2 Diabetes: Post-Hoc Analyses from Bardoxolone Methyl Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Study. Am. J. Nephrol. 2018, 47, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nangaku, M.; Kanda, H.; Takama, H.; Ichikawa, T.; Hase, H.; Akizawa, T. Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect of Bardoxolone Methyl on GFR in Diabetic Kidney Disease Patients (TSUBAKI Study). Kidney Int. Rep. 2020, 5, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. González-Reyes, S.; Guzmán-Beltrán, S.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Pedraza-Chaverrí, J. Curcumin Pretreatment Induces Nrf2 and an Antioxidant Response and Prevents Hemin-Induced Toxicity in Primary Cultures of Cerebellar Granule Neurons of Rats. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 801418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, C.C.; Li, S.J.; Yang, C.L.; Xue, R.L.; Xi, Y.Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Q.-L.; Li, D.-J. Sulforaphane Attenuates Muscle Inflammation in Dystrophin-deficient mdx Mice via NF-E2-related Factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated Inhibition of NF-κB Signaling Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 17784–17795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, E.N.; Lim, J.H.; Kim, M.Y.; Ban, T.H.; Jang, I.A.; Yoon, H.E.; Park, C.W.; Chang, Y.S.; Choi, B.S. Resveratrol, an Nrf2 activator, ameliorates aging-related progressive renal injury. Aging 2018, 10, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, X.N.; Ma, L.Y.; Ji, H.; Qin, Y.H.; Jin, S.S.; Xu, L.X. Resveratrol protects against oxidative stress by activating the Keap-1/Nrf2 antioxidant defense system in obese-asthmatic rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 4339–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ali, T.; Rehman, S.U.; Shah, F.A.; Kim, M.O. Acute dose of melatonin via Nrf2 dependently prevents acute ethanol-induced neurotoxicity in the developing rodent brain. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hayashi, G.; Jasoliya, M.; Sahdeo, S.; Saccà, F.; Pane, C.; Filla, A.; Marsili, A.; Puorro, G.; Lanzillo, R.; Morra, V.B.; et al. Dimethyl fumarate mediates Nrf2-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis in mice and humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 2864–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gafson, A.R.; Savva, C.; Thorne, T.; David, M.; Gomez-Romero, M.; Lewis, M.R.; Nicholas, R.; Heslegrave, A.; Zetterberg, H.; Matthews, P.M. Breaking the cycle: Reversal of flux in the tricarboxylic acid cycle by dimethyl fumarate. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 6, e562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bhargava, P.; Fitzgerald, K.C.; Venkata, S.L.V.; Smith, M.D.; Kornberg, M.D.; Mowry, E.M.; Haughey, N.J.; Calabresi, P.A. Dimethyl fumarate treatment induces lipid metabolism alterations that are linked to immunological changes. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2018, 6, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Paraiso, H.C.; Kuo, P.-C.; Curfman, E.T.; Moon, H.J.; Sweazey, R.D.; Yen, J.-H.; Chang, F.-L.; Yu, I.-C. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates reactive microglia and long-term memory deficits following systemic immune challenge. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Grzegorzewska, A.P.; Seta, F.; Han, R.; Czajka, C.A.; Makino, K.; Stawski, L.; Isenberg, J.S.; Browning, J.L.; Trojanowska, M. Dimethyl Fumarate ameliorates pulmonary arterial hypertension and lung fibrosis by targeting multiple pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Oh, C.J.; Park, S.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Jeoung, N.H.; Choi, Y.-K.; Go, Y.; Park, K.-G.; Lee, I.-K. Dimethylfumarate attenuates restenosis after acute vascular injury by cell-specific and Nrf2-dependent mechanisms. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, S.; Takasu, C.; Lau, H.; Robles, L.; Vo, K.; Farzaneh, T.; Vaziri, N.D.; Stamos, M.J.; Ichii, H. Dimethyl Fumarate Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis, through the Activation of Nrf2-Mediated Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Pathways. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaluzki, I.; Hailemariam-Jahn, T.; Doll, M.; Kaufmann, R.; Balermpas, P.; Zöller, N.; Kippenberger, S.; Meissner, M.; Jahn, H. Doll Dimethylfumarate Inhibits Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Proliferation: Evidence for Cell Cycle Arrest, Apoptosis and Autophagy. Cells 2019, 8, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fox, R.J.; Phillips, J.T. BG-12 in Multiple Sclerosis. Semin. Neurol. 2013, 33, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Reich, K.; Thaçi, D.; Mrowietz, U.; Kamps, A.; Neureither, M.; Luger, T. Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in the long-term treatment of psoriasis—A retrospective study (FUTURE). J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2009, 7, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mrowietz, U.; Szepietowski, J.; Loewe, R.; Van De Kerkhof, P.; Lamarca, R.; Ocker, W.; Tebbs, V.; Pau-Charles, I. Efficacy and safety of LAS41008 (dimethyl fumarate) in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, Fumaderm®- and placebo-controlled trial (BRIDGE). Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 176, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dröge, W. Free Radicals in the Physiological Control of Cell Function. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 47–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mittal, M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Tran, K.; Reddy, S.P.; Malik, A.B. Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1126–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Declercq, S.D.; Pouliot, R. Promising New Treatments for Psoriasis. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 980419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Moharregh-Khiabani, D.; A Linker, R.; Gold, R.; Stangel, M. Fumaric Acid and its Esters: An Emerging Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2009, 7, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Linker, R.A.; Haghikia, A. Dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis: Latest developments, evidence and place in therapy. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2016, 7, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Altmeyer, P.J.; Matthes, U.; Pawlak, F.; Hoffmann, K.; Frosch, P.J.; Ruppert, P.; Wassilew, S.W.; Horn, T.; Kreysel, H.W.; Lutz, G. Antipsoriatic effect of fumaric acid derivatives. Results of a multicenter double-blind study in 100 patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1994, 30, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wollina, U. Fumaric acid esters in dermatology. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 2011, 2, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rostami-Yazdi, M.; Mrowietz, U. Fumaric acid esters. Clin. Dermatol. 2008, 26, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nieboer, C.; De Hoop, D.; Van Loenen, A.; Langendijk, P.; Van Dijk, E. Systemic therapy with fumaric acid derivates: New possibilities in the treatment of psoriasis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989, 20, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ogawa, E.; Sato, Y.; Minagawa, A.; Okuyama, R. Pathogenesis of psoriasis and development of treatment. J. Dermatol. 2017, 45, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lowes, M.; Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Krueger, J.G. Immunology of Psoriasis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 32, 227–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Boehncke, W.-H.; Sterry, W. Psoriasis—A systemic inflammatory disorder: Clinic, pathogenesis and therapeutic perspectives. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2009, 7, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ellis, C.N.; Krueger, G.G. Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis by Selective Targeting of Memory Effector T Lymphocytes. New Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Diaz, G.M.; Fraussen, J.; Van Wijmeersch, B.; Hupperts, R.; Somers, V. Dimethyl fumarate induces a persistent change in the composition of the innate and adaptive immune system in multiple sclerosis patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Brück, J.; Dringen, R.; Amasuno, A.; Pau-Charles, I.; Ghoreschi, K. A review of the mechanisms of action of dimethylfumarate in the treatment of psoriasis. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hoefnagel, J.; Thio, H.; Willemze, R.; Bavinck, J.B. Long-term safety aspects of systemic therapy with fumaric acid esters in severe psoriasis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2003, 149, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schilling, S.; Goelz, S.; Linker, R.; Luehder, F.; Gold, R. Fumaric acid esters are effective in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and suppress macrophage infiltration. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 145, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. A Høglund, R. Multiple sclerosis and the role of immune cells. World J. Exp. Med. 2014, 4, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schimrigk, S.; Brune, N.; Hellwig, K.; Lukas, C.; Bellenberg, B.; Rieks, M.; Hoffmann, V.; Pohlau, D.; Przuntek, H. Oral fumaric acid esters for the treatment of active multiple sclerosis: An open-label, baseline-controlled pilot study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2006, 13, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fox, R.J.; Miller, D.H.; Phillips, J.T.; Hutchinson, M.; Havrdova, E.; Kita, M.; Yang, M.; Raghupathi, K.; Novas, M.; Sweetser, M.T.; et al. Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Oral BG-12 or Glatiramer in Multiple Sclerosis. New Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Phillips, J.T.; Selmaj, K.; Gold, R.; Fox, R.J.; Havrdova, E.; Giovannoni, G.; Abourjaily, H.; Pace, A.; Novas, M.; Hotermans, C.; et al. Clinical Significance of Gastrointestinal and Flushing Events in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Delayed-Release Dimethyl Fumarate. Int. J. MS Care 2015, 17, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Palte, M.J.; Wehr, A.; Tawa, M.; Perkin, K.; Leigh-Pemberton, R.; Hanna, J.; Miller, C.; Penner, N. Improving the Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Fumaric Acid Esters: Early Findings on Gastrointestinal Events with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis from the Phase 3, Open-Label EVOLVE-MS-1 Study. Adv. Ther. 2019, 36, 3154–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Fox, E.J.; Vasquez, A.; Grainger, W.; Ma, T.S.; Von Hehn, C.; Walsh, J.; Li, J.; Zambrano, J. Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Delayed-Release Dimethyl Fumarate in a Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Patients with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MANAGE). Int. J. MS Care 2016, 18, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wishart, D.S. DrugBank: A comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D668–D672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wilms, H.; Arnold, P.; Mojumder, D.; Detoledo, J.; Lucius, R. Pathophysiological processes in multiple sclerosis: Focus on nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 and emerging pathways. Clin. Pharmacol. Adv. Appl. 2014, 6, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Linker, R.A.; Lee, D.-H.; Ryan, S.; Van Dam, A.M.; Conrad, R.; Bista, P.; Zeng, W.; Hronowsky, X.; Buko, A.; Chollate, S.; et al. Fumaric acid esters exert neuroprotective effects in neuroinflammation via activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. Brain 2011, 134, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Martin, S.; Al Khleifat, A.; Al-Chalabi, A. What causes amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? F1000Research 2017, 6, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Beers, D.R.; Henkel, J.S.; Zhao, W.; Wang, J.; Appel, S.H. CD4+ T cells support glial neuroprotection, slow disease progression, and modify glial morphology in an animal model of inherited ALS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 15558–15563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Beers, D.R.; Henkel, J.S.; Zhao, W.; Wang, J.; Huang, A.; Wen, S.; Liao, B.; Appel, S.H. Endogenous regulatory T lymphocytes ameliorate amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in mice and correlate with disease progression in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2011, 134, 1293–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sakaguchi, S.; Miyara, M.; Costantino, C.M.; Hafler, D.A. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ghadiri, M.; Rezk, A.; Li, R.; Evans, A.; Luessi, F.; Zipp, F.; Giacomini, P.S.; Antel, J.; Bar-Or, A. Dimethyl fumarate–induced lymphopenia in MS due to differential T-cell subset apoptosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 4, e340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Gross, C.C.; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A.; Klinsing, S.; Posevitz-Fejfár, A.; Wiendl, H.; Klotz, L. Dimethyl fumarate treatment alters circulating T helper cell subsets in multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 3, e183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Vucic, S.; Ryder, J.; Mekhael, L.; Rd, H.; Mathers, S.; Needham, M.; Dw, S.; Mc, K. Phase 2 randomized placebo controlled double blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of tecfidera in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (TEALS Study). Medicine 2020, 99, e18904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bagherani, N.; Smoller, B.R. An overview of cutaneous T cell lymphomas. F1000Research 2016, 5, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Nicolay, J.P.; Müller-Decker, K.; Schroeder, A.; Brechmann, M.; Möbs, M.; Géraud, C.; Assaf, C.; Goerdt, S.; Krammer, P.H.; Gülow, K. Dimethyl fumarate restores apoptosis sensitivity and inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in CTCL by targeting NF-κB. Blood 2016, 128, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kensler, T.W.; Wakabayashi, N.; Slocum, S.L.; Skoko, J.J.; Shin, S. When NRF2 talks, who’s listening? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 13, 1649–1663. [Google Scholar]
  78. Osman, A.M.; Carter, S.G.; Carberry, J.C.; Eckert, D.J. Obstructive sleep apnea: Current perspectives. Nat. Sci. Sleep 2018, 10, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cofta, S.; Wysocka, E.; Dzięgielewska-Gęsiak, S.; Michalak, S.; Piorunek, T.; Batura-Gabryel, H.; Torlinski, L. Plasma Selectins in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 756, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ursavas, A.; Karadağ, M.; Rodoplu, E.; Yılmaztepe, A.; Oral, H.B.; Gözü, R.O. Circulating ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 Levels in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Respiration 2006, 74, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhong, A.; Xiong, X.; Shi, M.; Xu, H. Roles of interleukin (IL)-6 gene polymorphisms, serum IL-6 levels, and treatment in obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2015, 20, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Walsh, J.A.; Duffin, K.C.; Crim, J.; Clegg, D.O. Lower Frequency of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Spondyloarthritis Patients Taking TNF-Inhibitors. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2012, 8, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Carpagnano, G.E.; Spanevello, A.; Sabato, R.; DePalo, A.; Palladino, G.P.; Bergantino, L.; Barbaro, M.P.F. Systemic and airway inflammation in sleep apnea and obesity: The role of ICAM-1 and IL-8. Transl. Res. 2010, 155, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Aihara, K.; Oga, T.; Chihara, Y.; Harada, Y.; Tanizawa, K.; Handa, T.; Hitomi, T.; Uno, K.; Mishima, M.; Chin, K. Analysis of systemic and airway inflammation in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2012, 17, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Htoo, A.K.; Greenberg, H.; Tongia, S.; Chen, G.; Henderson, T.; Wilson, D.; Liu, S.F. Activation of nuclear factor kappaB in obstructive sleep apnea: A pathway leading to systemic inflammation. Sleep Breath. 2006, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Braley, T.J.; Segal, B.M.; Chervin, R.D. Sleep-disordered breathing in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2012, 79, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Jadeja, R.N.; Powell, F.L.; Martin, P.M. Repurposing Fumaric Acid Esters to Treat Conditions of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: A Promising Emerging Approach with Broad Potential. In Drug Repurposing; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Shakya, A.; Soni, U.K.; Rai, G.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Kumar, V. Gastro-protective and Anti-stress Efficacies of Monomethyl Fumarate and a Fumaria indica Extract in Chronically Stressed Rats. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 36, 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Altmeyer, P.; Hartwig, R.; Matthes, U. Efficacy and safety profile of fumaric acid esters in oral long-term therapy with severe treatment refractory psoriasis vulgaris. A study of 83 patients. Hautarzt 1996, 47, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rao, K.S.; Mishra, S.H. Antihepatotoxic activity of monomethyl fumarate isolated from Fumaria indica. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 60, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abdelrahman, R.S.; Abdel-Rahman, N. Dimethyl fumarate ameliorates acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in mice dependent of Nrf-2/HO-1 pathway. Life Sci. 2019, 217, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ramsey, C.P.; Glass, C.A.; Montgomery, M.B.; Lindl, K.A.; Ritson, G.P.; Chia, L.A.; Hamilton, R.L.; Chu, C.T.; Jordan-Sciutto, K.L. Expression of Nrf2 in Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 66, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hwang, O. Role of Oxidative Stress in Parkinson’s Disease. Exp. Neurobiol. 2013, 22, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Duan, X.; Wen, Z.; Shen, H.; Shen, M.; Chen, G. Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidant Therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1203285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Franco-Iborra, S.; Vila, M.; Perier, C. Mitochondrial Quality Control in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Focus on Parkinson’s Disease and Huntington’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Cenini, G.; Voos, W. Mitochondria as Potential Targets in Alzheimer Disease Therapy: An Update. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lastres-Becker, I.; García-Yagüe, A.J.; Scannevin, R.H.; Casarejos, M.J.; Kügler, S.; Rábano, A.; Cuadrado, A. Repurposing the NRF2 Activator Dimethyl Fumarate as Therapy Against Synucleinopathy in Parkinson’s Disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 25, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ellrichmann, G.; Lee, D.H.; Reick, C.; Arning, L.; Petrasch-Parwez, E.; Saft, C.; Gold, R.; Linker, R.A. B11 Targeting the Nrf2 pathway in Huntington’s disease: Fumaric acid esters as a new therapeutic option in neurodegeneration? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2010, 81 (Suppl. S1), A14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Ahn, B.; Pharaoh, G.; Premkumar, P.; Huseman, K.; Ranjit, R.; Kinter, M.; Szweda, L.; Kiss, T.; Fulop, G.; Tarantini, S.; et al. Nrf2 deficiency exacerbates age-related contractile dysfunction and loss of skeletal muscle mass. Redox Biol. 2018, 17, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kunze, R.; Urrutia, A.; Hoffmann, A.; Liu, H.; Helluy, X.; Pham, M.; Reischl, S.; Korff, T.; Marti, H.H. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates cerebral edema formation by protecting the blood–brain barrier integrity. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 266, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Iniaghe, L.O.; Krafft, P.R.; Klebe, D.W.; Omogbai, E.K.I.; Zhang, J.H.; Tang, J. Dimethyl fumarate confers neuroprotection by casein kinase 2 phosphorylation of Nrf2 in murine intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 82, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Zhao, X.; Sun, G.; Zhang, J.; Ting, S.-M.; Gonzales, N.; Aronowski, J. Dimethyl Fumarate Protects Brain From Damage Produced by Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Mechanism Involving Nrf2. Stroke 2015, 46, 1923–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Loewe, R.; Valero, T.; Kremling, S.; Pratscher, B.; Kunstfeld, R.; Pehamberger, H.; Petzelbauer, P. Dimethylfumarate Impairs Melanoma Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11888–11896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Yamazoe, Y.; Tsubaki, M.; Matsuoka, H.; Satou, T.; Itoh, T.; Kusunoki, T.; Kidera, Y.; Tanimori, Y.; Shoji, K.; Nakamura, H. Dimethylfumarate inhibits tumor cell invasion and metastasis by suppressing the expression and activities of matrix metalloproteinases in melanoma cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2009, 33, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Takeda, T.; Tsubaki, M.; Asano, R.; Itoh, T.; Imano, M.; Satou, T.; Nishida, S. Dimethyl fumarate suppresses metastasis and growth of melanoma cells by inhibiting the nuclear translocation of NF-κB. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Valero, T.; Steele, S.; Neumüller, K.; Bracher, A.; Niederleithner, H.; Pehamberger, H.; Petzelbauer, P.; Loewe, R. Combination of dacarbazine and dimethylfumarate efficiently reduces melanoma lymph node metastasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Xia, Y.; Shen, S.; Verma, I.M. NF- B, an Active Player in Human Cancers. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Cui, X.; Shen, D.; Kong, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Lin, X.; Liu, X. NF-κB suppresses apoptosis and promotes bladder cancer cell proliferation by upregulating survivin expression in vitro and in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Giuliani, C.; Bucci, I.; Napolitano, G. The Role of the Transcription Factor Nuclear Factor-kappa B in Thyroid Autoimmunity and Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kastrati, I.; Siklos, M.I.; Calderon-Gierszal, E.L.; El-Shennawy, L.; Georgieva, G.; Thayer, E.N.; Thatcher, G.R.J.; Frasor, J. Dimethyl Fumarate Inhibits the Nuclear Factor κB Pathway in Breast Cancer Cells by Covalent Modification of p65 Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 291, 3639–3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Shostak, K.; Chariot, A. NF-κB, stem cells and breast cancer: The links get stronger. Breast Cancer Res. 2011, 13, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Han, G.; Zhou, Q. Dimethylfumarate induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via regulating intracellular redox systems in HeLa cells. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2016, 52, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Saidu, N.E.B.; Noé, G.; Cerles, O.; Cabel, L.; Kavian-Tessler, N.; Chouzenoux, S. Dimethyl Fumarate Controls the NRF2/DJ-1 Axis in Cancer Cells: Therapeutic Applications. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Abdulle, A.E.; Diercks, G.F.H.; Feelisch, M.; Mulder, D.J.; Van Goor, H. The Role of Oxidative Stress in the Development of Systemic Sclerosis Related Vasculopathy. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Senoner, T.; Dichtl, W. Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Diseases: Still a Therapeutic Target? Nutrients 2019, 11, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Laplante, A.; Vincent, G.; Poirier, M.; Rosiers, C.D. Effects and metabolism of fumarate in the perfused rat heart. A 13C mass isotopomer study. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 1997, 272, E74–E82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Singh, S.V.; Warin, R.; Xiao, N.; Powolny, A.A.; Stan, S.D.; Arlotti, J.A.; Zeng, Y.; Hahm, E.-R.; Marynowski, S.W.; Bommareddy, A.; et al. Sulforaphane inhibits prostate carcinogenesis and pulmonary metastasis in TRAMP mice in association with increased cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2117–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Scapagnini, G.; Colombrita, C.; Amadio, M.; D’Agata, V.; Arcelli, E.; Sapienza, M.; Quattrone, A.; Calabrese, V. Curcumin Activates Defensive Genes and Protects Neurons Against Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Motterlini, R.; Foresti, R.; Bassi, R.; Green, C.J. Curcumin, an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, induces heme oxygenase-1 and protects endothelial cells against oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 28, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Moussa, C.; Hebron, M.; Huang, X.; Ahn, J.; Rissman, R.A.; Aisen, P.S.; Turner, R.S. Resveratrol regulates neuro-inflammation and induces adaptive immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pharmaceuticals 13 00306 g001 550
Figure 1. Approved and evidenced utility of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fumaric acid esters (FAE) versus potential utility in other diseases that are underscored by oxidative stress and hyperinflammation. DMF and FAE can exert their effects by enhancing cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory responses. This is proposed to lead to the reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn prevents oxidative tissue damage. DMF also inhibits nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), which subsequently reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and immune cell deviation and ultimately leads to reduced inflammation. BMD: Becker Muscular Dystrophy; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DMD: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus. Bar heads = inhibitory effect; Arrow heads = potential beneficial effect. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Approved and evidenced utility of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fumaric acid esters (FAE) versus potential utility in other diseases that are underscored by oxidative stress and hyperinflammation. DMF and FAE can exert their effects by enhancing cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory responses. This is proposed to lead to the reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn prevents oxidative tissue damage. DMF also inhibits nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), which subsequently reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and immune cell deviation and ultimately leads to reduced inflammation. BMD: Becker Muscular Dystrophy; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DMD: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus. Bar heads = inhibitory effect; Arrow heads = potential beneficial effect. Created with BioRender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 13 00306 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of fumaric acid esters either approved for human use, previously tested or currently examined in human/animal trials.
Table 1. Summary of fumaric acid esters either approved for human use, previously tested or currently examined in human/animal trials.
StatusCompoundDiseasePhase of Trial
Approved for Human UseDimethyl FumarateMultiple SclerosisApproved
PsoriasisApproved
Diroximel FumarateMultiple SclerosisApproved
Monomethyl FumarateMultiple SclerosisApproved
Human TrialsDimethyl FumarateAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisPhase II
Cutaneous T Cell LymphomaPhase II
Glioblastoma MultiformePhase II
Obstructive Sleep ApnoeaPhase II
Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase II
Pre-clinical Animal TrialsDimethyl FumarateBreast CancerPre-clinical
Colitis
Melanoma
Pancreatitis
Parkinson’s Disease
Sickle Cell Disease
Monomethyl FumarateGastric Ulcer
Sickle Cell Retinopathy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kourakis, S.; Timpani, C.A.; de Haan, J.B.; Gueven, N.; Fischer, D.; Rybalka, E. Dimethyl Fumarate and Its Esters: A Drug with Broad Clinical Utility? Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100306

AMA Style

Kourakis S, Timpani CA, de Haan JB, Gueven N, Fischer D, Rybalka E. Dimethyl Fumarate and Its Esters: A Drug with Broad Clinical Utility? Pharmaceuticals. 2020; 13(10):306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kourakis, Stephanie, Cara A. Timpani, Judy B. de Haan, Nuri Gueven, Dirk Fischer, and Emma Rybalka. 2020. "Dimethyl Fumarate and Its Esters: A Drug with Broad Clinical Utility?" Pharmaceuticals 13, no. 10: 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop