Next Article in Journal
Morphological, Biochemical, and Proteomic Analyses to Understand the Promotive Effects of Plant-Derived Smoke Solution on Wheat Growth under Flooding Stress
Previous Article in Journal
How Leaf Vein and Stomata Traits Are Related with Photosynthetic Efficiency in Falanghina Grapevine in Different Pedoclimatic Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

The Destructive Static Tree-Pulling Test Provides Reliable Estimates of the Soil–Root Plate of Eastern Baltic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.)

Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, 111 Rigas Str., LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1509; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111509
Submission received: 5 May 2022 / Revised: 24 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 4 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Response to Abiotic Stress and Climate Change)

Abstract

:
Under the intensifying cyclonic activity, the wind resistance of European forests could be increased through science-based adaptive forest management, which requires the quantification of tree stability. In this regard, the dimensions of the soil–root plate can be directly attributed to tree wind resistance; however, naturally uprooted trees might be a biased source of information for the evaluation of adaptive measures due to uncontrolled conditions and uneven sample size. Therefore, the dimensions of the soil–root plates of naturally windthrown silver birch trees (Betula pendula Roth.) are compared to artificially overturned trees under a static tree-pulling test in Eastern Baltic region. The application of static tree-pulling overestimated the dimensions of the soil–root plates of silver birch compared to windthrown trees. The overestimation of soil–root plate dimensions was consistent spatially and across soil types, which is likely a regional adaptation to local wind climate. This implies that static tree-pulling is representative of the assessment of the effects of adaptive management on tree stability via the dimensions of the soil–root plates.

1. Introduction

In the Eastern Baltic region, forest stands are subjected to an increasing frequency of wind disturbances due to the intensifying cyclonic activity from late autumn to early spring [1,2,3,4]. Wind damage is further amplified by the shortening of frozen soil periods [5,6,7], which leads to substantial economic losses [8], thus emphasizing the necessity for science-based climate-smart forest management [9,10,11,12,13]. In this regard, the properties of the soil–root plate are informative proxies of tree wind stability, allowing for a quantification of the effects of adaptive forest management [14,15]. Although the properties of the soil–root plate can be assessed for naturally windthrown trees, such trees can rarely form a reasonable sample size to evaluate the effects of management, as wind damage is largely stochastic [15]. Another option is experimental overthrowing by static tree-pulling tests, which have been widely applied to assess the tree mechanical stability [16,17,18]. Under static pulling, the tree is subjected to a continuous loading until a fatal failure as stem breakage or uprooting occurs; however, such an evaluation might result in biased estimates of the properties of the soil–root plate due to the lack of dynamic components of stability, such as inertia and swaying [19]. Accordingly, the assessment of the relationships between properties of the soil–root plate acquired by static tree-pulling tests and after windthrow are essential for a reliable evaluation of adaptive management [15]. Tree populations adapt to regional (e.g., wind climate) and local (e.g., soil) growing conditions [14,15]; hence, local data are necessary to reduce the bias when estimating tree wind loading resistance.
The aim of the present study is to compare the soil–root plates of middle-aged trees uprooted by windthrow and static tree-pulling tests on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and waterlogged mineral soils. Silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.), which is widespread on mineral and organic soils [20] and has high ecological and economic importance in North-East Europe [21], was used as a model species. Birch is reported to have a high plasticity of wind loading adaptation across a wide gradient of soil types [22]. Accordingly, we hypothesize that the static tree-pulling test overestimates the soil–root plates compared to windthrown trees.

2. Results and Discussion

In the Eastern Baltic region, the application of static-pulling overestimated the dimensions of soil–root plates of middle-aged silver birch compared to windthrown trees (Figure 1; Table 1). The differences were strong (Wald’s χ2 ≥ 11.80) and highly significant (p < 0.001) for the volume, depth, and particularly for width of the soil–root plate. The overestimation was spatially consistent, as indicated by a non-significant (p > 0.22) effect (random) of the studied sub-regions (the geobotanical district [23]) on the differences of soil–root plate dimensions, as determined by mixed-effect models (Table 1). The overestimation of soil–root plate width and depth was, on average, 53% and 46%, respectively, while for volume, which is a function of the two, it was 206%. The overestimation differed by soil type; it was lower for drained deep peat compared to periodically waterlogged mineral and particularly on freely draining mineral soils (52%, 101%, and 152%, respectively).
Under static loading, larger soil–root plates were torn out, likely due to the lack of dynamic components of tree stability, such as tree swaying and inertia of soil [19], which was particularly prevalent for mineral soils (Figure 1). Accordingly, a larger amount of soil remained attached to the roots [24]. Additionally, due to a slower course of uprooting under static loading, root breakage occurred at smaller diameters [25], hence at a greater distance from the stem, thus explaining the explicit overestimation of soil–root plate width. Alternatively, the overestimation of the dimensions of the soil–root plate might be partially related to the specific selection of sample trees for the static tree-pulling, as vital, dominant trees without visual signs of mechanical damage were tested [18,22]. In contrast, the set of studied windthrown trees likely contained the weakest individuals in the stands, probably due to various reasons, such as lower vitality, which might include pathogen infestation [26,27]. For instance, root-rot is known to reduce the spread of the soil–root plate [28]; although, the decay of structural roots was not visible for the windthrown trees. The relationship between the basal bending moment at the fatal failure (BBM) and the volume of the soil–root plate for the pulled trees was linear, irrespective of soil type, though with some regional specifics (Figure 2, Table 2). For the windthrown trees, such a relationship was not assessed to avoid bias, as BBM could only be roughly estimated. However, the estimates of BBM of windthrown and pulled trees overlapped with the exception of freely draining mineral soils, where windthrown trees appeared smaller and weaker (Figure 2).
Silver birch is reported to have a high adaptability of soil–root plate to diverse soil conditions [16,29,30], for instance, plastically increasing leverage and rooting depth on loose soils [22,24]. Accordingly, soil type (freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and waterlogged mineral) had a significant (p < 0.001) effect on the soil–root plate volume and surface radii (width) for both static tree-pulling and windthrow trees (Figure 1; Table 1 and Table 2). Although tested soil types have different mechanical properties [31,32,33], the absence of interaction between uprooting cause and soil type (p = 0.31) implied a consistent overestimation of soil–root plate by static tree-pulling across the studied soil types. Such a consistency can be related to the regional adaptation of Eastern Baltic silver birch to the local wind climate [34], supporting the adaptive significance of tree mechanical stability [35]. The consistency of deviations between uprooting cause, regardless of local/regional climate, landscape, and soil conditions, supports the comparability of the dimensions of the soil–root plates between static tree-pulling and windthrow. Thereby, the current results support static tree-pulling as a reliable approach for the assessment of the relationships between the properties of the soil–root plate, which is essential for a sufficient evaluation of adaptive management [15].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Data Acquisition and Measurements

Data for the soil–root plates overturned by static tree-pulling were acquired from earlier studies assessing the mechanical stability of Eastern Baltic silver birch [18,22] in the hemiboreal forests of the Eastern Baltic region in Latvia (55°56′–57°27′ N and 21°40′–26°23′ E; Table 3). The climate in the studied region is humid continental [36], influenced by the dominant westerlies from the North Atlantic [37], under which continentality increases eastwards [38]. The mean annual air temperature and the mean maximum wind speed are higher at the elevation of 10 m and in the western part of Latvia, reaching +7.9 °C and 27.5 m s−1, respectively, while in the eastern part, they are +6.3 °C and 11.9 m s−1, respectively [39,40]. In both coastal and inland areas, the warmest month is July (+17.8 and 17.7 °C, respectively) and the coldest is February (−2.0 and −4.4 °C, respectively) [39]. The mean annual sum of precipitation is 685.6 mm, with the highest monthly mean in August (94.7 mm) [39].
In total, data for 115 birch trees were collected in the destructive static tree-pulling tests (Table 3), which were conducted during 2019–2021 [18,22]. During the tests, the dimensions of the stem and crown were recorded and the BBM of the stem at the failure was estimated. In these studies, sample trees were located in 17 naturally regenerated silver birch stands with stand ages being 30–60 years, which predominantly contained spruce in the understory (advanced growth). The admixture of light-demanding species in the canopy was low, reaching 30% of the stand basal area. Three to ten trees were sampled per stand. The studied stands were growing on mesotrophic freely draining mineral (Hylocomiosa forest type with podzols), periodically waterlogged (wet) mesotrophic mineral soils (Myrtilloso-sphagnosa forest type with gleyic podzol) and eutrophic drained deep peat soils (Myrtillosa turf.mel. and Oxalidosa tuf. Mel. forest types with fibric histosols) [41,42]. The topography was flat.
For the representation of the dimensions of the soil–root plate of silver birch after natural uprooting, 62 freshly windthrown trees were surveyed across the territory of Latvia following cyclonic wind events under non-frozen soil conditions during January–March 2022 (Table 3). During the wind event, the maximum speed of wind (westerlies) ranged from 17.6–27.8 m s−1 with the strongest winds being recorded in the coastal western part of Latvia [39]. Only freshly windthrown trees were assessed to reduce the bias due to soil loosening and the erosion of soil–root plates. Similar to pulling tests, trees growing on the edges of openings were avoided. The surveyed trees represented 15 stands similar to those sampled during the static tree-pulling [18,22]. Canopy trees were surveyed, which represented the mean dimensions of stands and all of them formed the canopy. The surveyed stands on dry mineral and drained deep peat soils were mostly pure or admixed with Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.). In the stands on wet mineral soils, birch was generally admixed by common aspen (Populus tremula L.). All of the studied stands were conventionally managed, which implies natural regeneration after a clear cut, with a rotation period of 71 years, and two to three thinnings. Such an approach intends to target a stand density of 2000–2500 trees per hectare after pre-commercial thinning, with a further consecutive reduction in the thinnings to 1000–1500 and 600–800 trees per hectare. Accordingly, all of the stands underwent pre-commercial thinning; however, no recent thinnings (5–10 years) have been conducted.
For all trees, the dimensions of the soil–root plate were measured by the same methodology. In brief, for each soil–root plate, five radii (at 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°) of the surface were measured (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1). The maximum depth of soil–root plates was estimated by piercing a steel rod near the stem base perpendicular to the surface.

3.2. Data Analysis

The volume of the soil–root plate, which is the proxy of tree stability [25], was estimated as the volume of an elliptical paraboloid as follows:
V = ( 1 2 ) · π · a · b · h ,
where h is the depth, and a and b are the longest and shortest of the five measured radii of the soil–root plate, respectively (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1). Due to the differences in sizes of the studied trees (Table 3), relative dimensions of the soil–root plate were calculated. The relative volume of the soil–root plate was expressed per stemwood volume, yet relative width and depth of soil–root plate per diameter at breast height. Stemwood volume was calculated using local equation [43]:
V = 0.0000909·H0.71677·DBH0.072·ln(H)+1.7570
where H is the tree height and DBH is the stem diameter at breast height.
For the windthrown trees, BBM was approximated according to Jones (1984) [44] as:
BBM = 0.25· π·C ·u2·p/(R·Tw·h,
where C is a dimensionless species-specific drag coefficient (0.12); u, p, and T are the maximum wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and temperature during the strongest wind event in January–March 2022 recorded by the nearest meteorological station (less than 40 km); and w and h are the width and height of the canopy, respectively.
The differences in the soil–root plate according to the uprooting cause and soil type were assessed using a linear mixed-effects model:
yij = µ + ucij + sij + ucij × sij + (dj) + (ucij | dj) + ε,
where yij is the relative dimension of the soil–root plate (volume, depth, and width), ucij is the fixed effect of the uprooting cause (windthrow or static tree-pulling test), sij is the fixed effect of soil type, ucij × sij is the interaction between uprooting cause and soil type, and (dj) and (ucij | dj) are the random intercept and random slope of uprooting cause by the local geobotanical district [23]. Geobotanical districts are local divisions of growing conditions according to edaphic and climatic factors, which affect the local adaptation of Eastern Baltic silver birch [35].
The relationship between BBM and the volume of soil–root plate was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model:
vij = µ + bbmij × sij + sij + (dj) + ε,
where vij is the volume of soil–root plate, sij is a fixed effect of soil type, bbmij × sij is the fixed interaction of stem basal bending moment and soil type, and (dj) is the random intercept of the local geobotanical district. The significance of fixed effects was estimated by Wald’s χ2 test; the leave-one-out test [45] was used to determine the significance of random effects. Data analysis was performed in R software (v 4.1.0.) (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) [46] using the packages “MuMIn” [47], “lmerTest” [45], “emmeans” [48], and “lme4” [49].

4. Conclusions

Static pulling consistently overestimated the dimensions of the soil–root plate of Eastern Baltic silver birch, regardless of landscape and soil type, approving the hypothesis of the study. Such a systematical overestimation implies the comparability of soil–root plate dimensions acquired by static tree-pulling across environmental gradients and management practices. Despite the local data, such relationships likely apply to a wider geographic range, at least as a methodological development. Therefore, static tree-pulling can be encouraged to be used in the assessment of tree stability as a highly informative method.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11111509/s1; Figure S1: Five radii on the surface of soil–root plate (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M., Ā.J. and V.S.; methodology, O.K. and J.V.; formal analysis, O.K., J.V. and R.M.; data curation, A.S. and J.V.; writing—original draft preparation, J.V. and O.K.; writing—review and editing, V.S., R.S. and Ā.J.; project administration, Ā.J.; funding acquisition, Ā.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the ERDF project “Birch and aspen stand management decision support tool for reduction of wind damages” (No 1.1.1.1/18/A/134).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Discussions with the researcher Janis Donis as well as other researchers from the FOSPREF-Wind team have helped to develop the concept of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ossó, A.; Allan, R.P.; Hawkins, E.; Shaffrey, L.; Maraun, D. Emerging new climate extremes over Europe. Clim. Dyn. 2022, 58, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Donis, J.; Kitenberga, M.; Snepsts, G.; Dubrovskis, E.; Jansons, A. Factors affecting windstorm damage at the stand level in hemiboreal forests in Latvia: Case study of 2005 winter storm. Silva Fenn. 2018, 52, 10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gregow, H.; Laurila, T.K.; Mäkelä, A.; Rantanen, M. Review on Winds, Extratropical Cyclones and Their Impacts in Northern Europe and Finland; Finnish Meteorological Institute: Helsinki, Finland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikonen, V.P.; Kilpeläinen, A.; Strandman, H.; Asikainen, A.; Venäläinen, A.; Peltola, H. Effects of using certain tree species in forest regeneration on regional wind damage risks in Finnish boreal forests under different CMIP5 projections. Eur. J. For. Res. 2020, 139, 685–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Venäläinen, A.; Tuomenvirta, H.; Heikinheimo, M.; Kellomäki, S.; Peltola, H.; Strandman, H.; Väisänen, H. Impact of climate change on soil frost under snow cover in a forested landscape. Clim. Res. 2001, 17, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Peltola, H.; Ikonen, V.P.; Gregow, H.; Strandman, H.; Kilpeläinen, A.; Venäläinen, A.; Kellomäki, S. Impacts of climate change on timber production and regional risks of wind-induced damage to forests in Finland. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Laapas, M.; Lehtonen, I.; Venäläinen, A.; Peltola, H.M. The 10-year return levels of maximum wind speeds under frozen and unfrozen soil forest conditions in Finland. Climate 2019, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Seidl, R.; Thom, D.; Kautz, M.; Martin-Benito, D.; Peltoniemi, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Wild, J.; Ascoli, D.; Petr, M.; Honkaniemi, J.; et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Griess, V.C.; Knoke, T. Growth performance, windthrow, and insects: Meta-analyses of parameters influencing performance of mixed-species stands in boreal and northern temperate biomes. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41, 1141–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Valinger, E.; Fridman, J. Factors affecting the probability of windthrow at stand level as a result of Gudrun winter storm in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jactel, H.; Bauhus, J.; Boberg, J.; Bonal, D.; Castagneyrol, B.; Gardiner, B.; Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.R.; Koricheva, J.; Meurisse, N.; Brockerhoff, E.G. Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Curr. For. Rep. 2017, 3, 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brockerhoff, E.G.; Barbaro, L.; Castagneyrol, B.; Forrester, D.I.; Gardiner, B.; González-Olabarria, J.R.; Lyver, P.O.B.; Meurisse, N.; Oxbrough, A.; Taki, H.; et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017, 26, 3005–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nabuurs, G.-J.; Verkerk, P.J.; Schelhaas, M.-J.; Ramón González Olabarria, J.; Trasobares, A.; Cienciala, E. Climate-Smart Forestry: Mitigation Impacts in Three European Regions. From Science to Policy 6; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2018; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nicoll, B.C.; Ray, D. Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gardiner, B.; Schuck, A.R.T.; Schelhaas, M.J.; Orazio, C.; Blennow, K.; Nicoll, B. What Science Can Tell Us. Living with Storm Damage to Forests; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2013; Volume 13, ISBN 978-952-5980-09-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicoll, B.C.; Gardiner, B.A.; Rayner, B.; Peace, A.J. Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 36, 1871–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peltola, H.; Kellomäki, S.; Hassinen, A.; Granander, M. Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: An analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krišāns, O.; Čakša, L.; Matisons, R.; Rust, S.; Elferts, D.; Seipulis, A.; Jansons, Ā. A static pulling test is a suitable method for comparison of the loading resistance of silver birch (Betula pendula roth.) between urban and peri-urban forests. Forests 2022, 13, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. James, K. Dynamic loading of trees. J. Arboric. 2003, 29, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Terauds, A.; Brumelis, G.; Nikodemus, O. Seventy-year changes in tree species composition and tree ages in state-owned forests in Latvia. Scand. J. For. Res. 2011, 26, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hynynen, J.; Niemistö, P.; Viherä-Aarnio, A.; Brunner, A.; Hein, S.; Velling, P. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in Northern Europe. Forestry 2010, 83, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Krišāns, O.; Matisons, R.; Kitenberga, M.; Donis, J.; Rust, S.; Elferts, D.; Jansons, Ā. Wind resistance of Eastern Baltic silver birch (Betula pendula roth.) suggests its suitability for periodically waterlogged sites. Forests 2021, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prieditis, N. Geobotanical features of Latvian peatland forest communities. Flora 1993, 188, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Coutts, M.P. Root architecture and tree stability. In Tree Root Systems and Their Mycorrhizas; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1983; pp. 171–188. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peltola, H.M. Mechanical stability of trees under static loads. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1501–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Krišāns, O.; Saleniece, R.; Rust, S.; Elferts, D.; Kapostins, R.; Jansons, A.; Matisons, R. Effect of bark-stripping on mechanical stability of Norway Spruce. Forests 2020, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Krisans, O.; Matisons, R.; Rust, S.; Burnevica, N.; Bruna, L.; Elferts, D.; Kalvane, L.; Jansons, A. Presence of root rot reduces stability of Norway spruce (Picea abies): Results of static pulling tests in Latvia. Forests 2020, 11, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Stenlid, J.; Redfern, D.B. Spread within the tree and stand. In Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; Woodward, S., Stenlid, J., Karjalainen, R., Hüttemann, A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, CT, USA, 1998; pp. 125–143. [Google Scholar]
  29. Krišāns, O.; Samariks, V.; Donis, J.; Jansons, Ā. Structural root-plate characteristics of wind-thrown Norway spruce in hemiboreal forests of Latvia. Forests 2020, 11, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Samariks, V.; Īstenais, N.; Seipulis, A.; Miezīte, O.; Krišāns, O.; Jansons, Ā. Root-soil plate characteristics of silver birch on wet and dry mineral soils in Latvia. Forests 2021, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ray, D.; Nicoll, B.C. The effect of soil water-table depth on root-plate development and stability of Sitka spruce. For. An Int. J. For. Res. 1998, 71, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lehtonen, I.; Venäläinen, A.; Kämäräinen, M.; Asikainen, A.; Laitila, J.; Anttila, P.; Peltola, H. Projected decrease in wintertime bearing capacity on different forest and soil types in Finland under a warming climate. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 23, 1611–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Uusitalo, J.; Ala-Ilomäki, J. The significance of above-ground biomass, moisture content and mechanical properties of peat layer on the bearing capacity of ditched pine bogs. Silva Fenn. 2013, 47, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Samariks, V.; Krisans, O.; Donis, J.; Silamikele, I.; Katrevics, J.; Jansons, A. Cost-benefit analysis of measures to reduce windstorm impact in pure Norway Spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) stands in Latvia. Forests 2020, 11, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gailis, A.; Zeltiņš, P.; Matisons, R.; Purviņš, A.; Augustovs, J.; Vīndedzis, V.; Jansons, Ā. Local adaptation of phenotypic stem traits distinguishes two provenance regions of silver birch in Latvia. Silva Fenn. 2021, 55, 10524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belda, M.; Holtanová, E.; Halenka, T.; Kalvová, J. Climate classification revisited: From Köppen to Trewartha. Clim. Res. 2014, 59, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jaagus, J.; Briede, A.; Rimkus, E.; Remm, K. Precipitation pattern in the Baltic countries under the influence of large-scale atmospheric circulation and local. Int. J. Climatol. 2010, 30, 705–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kļaviņš, M.; Avotniece, Z.; Rodinovs, V. Dynamics and impacting factors of ice regimes in Latvia inland and coastal waters. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. 2017, 70, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. LEGMC. Climate of Latvia. Available online: https://klimats.meteo.lv/klimats/latvijas_klimats/ (accessed on 21 March 2022).
  40. Karagali, I.; Hahmann, A.N.; Badger, M.; Hasager, C.; Mann, J. New European wind atlas offshore. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1037, 052007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bušs, K. Forest ecosystem classification in Latvia. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. 1997, 51, 204–218. [Google Scholar]
  42. FAO. IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. Update 2015; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  43. Liepa, I. Pieauguma mācība [Increment Theory]; Latvia University of Agriculture: Jelgava, Latvia, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones, H.G. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kuznetsova, A.; Brockhoff, P.B.; Christensen, R.H.B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 2017, 82, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015; Available online: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  47. Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  48. Lenth, R.; Buerkner, P.; Herve, M.; Love, J.; Miguez, F.; Riebl, H.; Singmann, H. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.4.2. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html (accessed on 3 June 2022).
  49. Bates, D.; Maechler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (±95% standard error) volume (A) (expressed per stemwood volume), depth (B), and width (C) (expressed per stem diameter at breast height) of soil–root plates of pulled and windthrown trees of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (±95% standard error) volume (A) (expressed per stemwood volume), depth (B), and width (C) (expressed per stem diameter at breast height) of soil–root plates of pulled and windthrown trees of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Plants 11 01509 g001
Figure 2. The relationship between relative stem basal bending moment (BBM in kNm) (expressed per stemwood volume in m3) and the volume of soil–root plate (in m3) of pulled and windthrown trees of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Figure 2. The relationship between relative stem basal bending moment (BBM in kNm) (expressed per stemwood volume in m3) and the volume of soil–root plate (in m3) of pulled and windthrown trees of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Plants 11 01509 g002
Table 1. Strength (Wald’s χ2) and significance (p-value) of the fixed effects of uprooting cause and soil type, as well as random variances and significance of the geobotanical district and model performance (R2) for the volume (expressed per stemwood volume), depth, and width (expressed per stem diameter at breast height) of soil–root plate of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Table 1. Strength (Wald’s χ2) and significance (p-value) of the fixed effects of uprooting cause and soil type, as well as random variances and significance of the geobotanical district and model performance (R2) for the volume (expressed per stemwood volume), depth, and width (expressed per stem diameter at breast height) of soil–root plate of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Relative VolumeRelative DepthRelative Width
Fixed Effectsχ2p-Valueχ2p-Valueχ2p-Value
(Intercept)25.97<0.001238.97<0.001202.73<0.001
Uprooting cause11.21<0.00111.80<0.00128.86<0.001
Soil type52.68<0.0012.370.3042.60<0.001
Uprooting cause by soil type 2.340.310.890.643.500.17
Random EffectsVar.p-ValueVar.p-ValueVar.p-Value
Geobotanical district:
(Intercept)0.860.231.12 × 10−50.483.13 × 10−50.95
Uprooting cause (wind)0.870.221.65 × 10−50.422.17 × 10−60.96
Residual2.38 4.03 × 10−5 9.48 × 10−5
Ntrees177 176 178
Ndistrict8 8 8
Marginal R20.42 0.31 0.48
Conditional R20.53 0.46 0.60
Table 2. Strength (Wald’s χ2) and significance (p-value) of the fixed effects of stem basal bending moment (BBM) and soil type, random variances and significance of the geobotanical district and model performance (R2) for the volume of soil–root plate of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Table 2. Strength (Wald’s χ2) and significance (p-value) of the fixed effects of stem basal bending moment (BBM) and soil type, random variances and significance of the geobotanical district and model performance (R2) for the volume of soil–root plate of Eastern Baltic silver birch on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Volume
Fixed Effectsχ2p-Value
BBM65.95<0.001
Soil type20.21<0.001
BBM by soil type1.720.42
Random EffectsVar.p-Value
Geobotanical district:
(Intercept)0.170.02
Residual0.71
Ntrees115
Ndistrict3
Marginal R20.40
Conditional R20.52
Table 3. Tree (Tree n) and stand number (Stand n); mean (±standard error) stem diameter at breast height (DBH); height (H), ratio of height, and stem diameter at breast height (H/DBH); stemwood volume (Vstem); depth, width, and volume (Vroots) of soil–root plate of pulled and windthrown Eastern Baltic silver birches on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
Table 3. Tree (Tree n) and stand number (Stand n); mean (±standard error) stem diameter at breast height (DBH); height (H), ratio of height, and stem diameter at breast height (H/DBH); stemwood volume (Vstem); depth, width, and volume (Vroots) of soil–root plate of pulled and windthrown Eastern Baltic silver birches on freely draining mineral, drained deep peat, and periodically waterlogged mineral soils.
SoilTree
n
Stand
n
DBH
(cm)
H
(m)
H/DBHVstem
(m3)
Width
(m)
Depth
(m)
Vroots
(m3)
Pulled
Dry791025.9 ± 0.827.3 ± 0.51.09 ± 0.020.75 ± 0.061.1 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.11.66 ± 0.13
Peat15321.0 ± 1.222.5 ± 0.61.10 ± 0.040.38 ± 0.061.4 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.12.31 ± 0.30
Wet21422.0 ± 0.922.0 ± 0.71.01 ± 0.020.41 ± 0.041.3 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.11.97 ± 0.25
Windthrown
Dry221034.5 ± 1.729.0 ± 0.80.86 ± 0.031.32 ± 0.160.9 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.10.93 ± 0.20
Peat22121.4 ± 0.923.0 ± 0.51.10 ± 0.030.40 ± 0.041.1 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.11.42 ± 0.28
Wet18429.4 ± 1.628.8 ± 0.41.03 ± 0.060.93 ± 0.101.2 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.11.15 ± 0.16
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krišāns, O.; Matisons, R.; Vuguls, J.; Seipulis, A.; Samariks, V.; Saleniece, R.; Jansons, Ā. The Destructive Static Tree-Pulling Test Provides Reliable Estimates of the Soil–Root Plate of Eastern Baltic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Plants 2022, 11, 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111509

AMA Style

Krišāns O, Matisons R, Vuguls J, Seipulis A, Samariks V, Saleniece R, Jansons Ā. The Destructive Static Tree-Pulling Test Provides Reliable Estimates of the Soil–Root Plate of Eastern Baltic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Plants. 2022; 11(11):1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krišāns, Oskars, Roberts Matisons, Jānis Vuguls, Andris Seipulis, Valters Samariks, Renāte Saleniece, and Āris Jansons. 2022. "The Destructive Static Tree-Pulling Test Provides Reliable Estimates of the Soil–Root Plate of Eastern Baltic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.)" Plants 11, no. 11: 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop