Next Article in Journal
Challenges and Opportunities of Mass Vaccination Centers in COVID-19 Times: A Rapid Review of Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Preexisting Immunity to Tetanus Toxoid on the Efficacy of Tetanus Toxoid-Conjugated Heroin Vaccine in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals

by
Yvelise Barrios
1,
Andres Franco
1,
Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín
2,
Paloma Poza-Guedes
2,
Ruperto González-Pérez
2 and
Victor Matheu
2,*
1
Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
2
Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2021, 9(6), 575; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060575
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 23 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)

Abstract

:
Background: Monitoring cellular immune responses elicited in vaccinated individuals is highly complicated. Methods: 28 individuals participated during the vaccination process with 12 BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer) vaccine. Specific anti-RBD IgG using a classic ELISA was performed in days 10 and 20 (after one dose of the vaccine) and on day 35 (after two vaccine doses) in serum samples of all participants. In parallel, DTH (delayed-type hypersensitivity) Skin Test using S protein was performed before (11/28) and after two doses (28/28) of the vaccine. Results: 6/28 individuals were considered positive for the specific anti-RBD IgG positive at day 10, whereas all 28 individuals were positive at day 20. Moreover, 28/28 individuals increased the OD ratios at day 36 (2 doses). DTH cutaneous test was performed on 11/28 participants at day 20 (1 dose) showing 8/11 a positive reaction at 12 h. DTH of all participants was performed on day 36 (2 doses), showing 28/28 positive reactions at 12 h. Conclusion: This report describes the first publication of the results obtained using an in vivo method, the classical DTH response to the Spike protein to assess T-cell immune responses in vaccinated individuals. This affordable and simple test would help to answer basic immunogenicity questions on large-scale population vaccine studies.

1. Introduction

Ongoing studies are monitoring immune responses elicited by mRNA vaccines. Few studies have been focused on the role that the immune cellular responses might play in the development of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and what are the implications for vaccines. Usually, most studies have systematically explored only humoral responses assuming that individuals with high antibody levels after infection should also have a high number of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells. However, there is evidence that T cells producing interferon γ have also been detected a median of 75 days after PCR confirmed COVID-19 in people with undetectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies [1], suggesting immunity is partly mediated and maintained by memory T cells. Finally, a preprint of a recent study of 100 people with a history of asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 reports T cell mediated immune responses lasting for at least six months in all participants [2].
Most of these studies have been mainly focused on the humoral side with few studies addressing cellular immune responses [3,4,5]. One of the reasons behind this lack of studies is that both ELISAs antibody methods and in vitro cellular assays require the extraction of a blood sample from the patient that complicate massive analysis in large populations. Here, we present the results of a novel application of an in vivo method to monitor cellular immune responses elicited in vaccinated individuals. This method has been previously validated in SARS-CoV-2 exposed individuals [6] showing a strong concordance (84.3%) with anti-RBD IgG.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Twenty-eight individuals were enrolled from the health care workers priority group vaccinated at the Hospital Universitario de Canarias during February–March 2021. These patients were to be vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA Pfizer vaccine. All of them were given a written document with the relevant and necessary information to decide on their participation in the study. The study is conducted in accordance with the requirements expressed in Law and the protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Hospital (CHUC_2021_04).

2.2. Serology

The vaccine administration schedule was carried out on days 0 and 21. Serum samples were collected from the participants on days 0, 10, 20 (just before the second dose) and on day 36 (15 days after the second dose). Every single sample was sent to the Immunology laboratory and frozen. and sent to the Immunology laboratory. A commercial ELISA IgG specific for the S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 was used according to manufacturer’s instructions (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). Results were expressed as Optical Density (O.D.) ratios as it has been recently described and validated for these determinations [7]. OD ratios under 0.8 were considered negative.

2.3. Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity (DTH) Skin Test

The protocol was performed according to usual clinical practice [8] and as previously described [4]. Briefly, after signing the informed consent, 25 microL (0.1 mg/mL final concentration) for intradermal puncture (IDT) of the spike protein was administered in the volar part of arm. A lyophilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 protein of the receptor binding domain (RBD) was re-suspended in sterile water and sterile filtered 0.22 µm with a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL following the manufacturer’s instructions and under controlled sterilization conditions. The final concentration was obtained from that normally used in the tuberculin test [9]. The participants had been instructed to avoid antihistamines and corticosteroids at least 5 days before the DTH skin test and to take a well-focused photograph with a ruler to assess the size of the reaction at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after injection. DTH was performed in all patients on day 36, 14 days after the second dose. A 24-h helpline was provided for their consultation and evaluation if necessary. A positive response was considered in the case of a positive cellular response function. Additionally, DTH was also performed in 11 patients on day 20. Ten negative controls without previous infection and without vaccination were used to see the null responsiveness of the protein.

3. Results

3.1. Specific IgG anti Spike

We evaluated immune responses in 28 immunocompetent subjects who received two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Pfizer vaccination. Six out of 28 sera collected at day 10 showed specific anti-RBD IgG OD ratio values considered positive (>0.8), whereas serum from each of 28 individuals were positive at day 20 (1 dose). Moreover, all 28 individuals increased the OD ratios at day 36 (2 doses) (Figure 1).

3.2. Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Test

Skin DTH test was performed on day 36, 14 days after second dose, in all 28 individuals and showing 28/28 positive reactions. Mean diameter was 8.12 mm (STD 3.54) after 6 h of puncture, 14.43 mm (6.00) after 12 h, 18.29 mm (6.51) after 24 h and 14.18 mm (6.06) after 48 h of puncture (Table 1) (Figure 2a). Additionally, DTH cutaneous test had been performed on 11 participants at day 20, prior to the second dose. Results showed that 8 out of 11 individuals had a positive reaction (Figure 2b). Mean diameter of DTH skin test in the eight positive individuals was 3.2 mm after 6 h of puncture, 6.63 mm (5.26) after 12 h, 13.25 mm (4.71) after 24 h and 13 mm (8.39) after 48 h of puncture. No individual exhibits an immediate reaction after 15 min and up to 45 min after the IDT administration.

4. Discussion

Nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) vaccines are considered the next generation vaccines as they can be rapidly designed to encode any desirable viral sequence including the highly conserved antigen sequences. RNA vaccines being less prone to host genome integration and anti-vector immunity (a compromising factor of viral vectors) offer great potential as front-runners for universal COVID-19 vaccine. The proof of concept for RNA-based vaccines has already been proven in humans with safety and immunogenicity outcomes that confirms these high expectations [10].
As it has been previously reported, we found that although all participants were anti-RBD IgG positive before the second dose, there is a remarkable increase in the OD ratio on day 36 (after 2 doses). However, the skin DTH test was positive in 8/11 individuals after a single dose of vaccine. All participants (28/28) developed a positive DTH test after two doses of the vaccine, showing that It seems that both vaccine doses are needed for the detection of in vivo T cell immune reaction. This finding would be in line with the in vitro data previously reported about the presence of memory B cells specific for the spike receptor binding domain (RBD) efficiently primed by mRNA vaccination and detectable after the second vaccine dose [3]. The kinetics of DTH skin reaction was more rapid (12 h) and wanes faster (48 h) in vaccinated individuals compared with natural immunized patients [4].
DTH responses are a component of the type IV hypersensitivity reaction category of cell-mediated immunity. Unlike types I–III, which involve various forms of antibody-mediated activities, only effector T cells and activated macrophages participate in DTH responses [11]. These responses are often associated with the host response to intracellular pathogens [12]. Their detection is best exemplified by the well-known tuberculin test (also known as the Mantoux or purified protein derivative [PPD] skin test) [9]. When a patient previously exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis is injected with a small amount of PPD (tuberculin) intradermally, there is little reaction in the first few hours. Gradually, however, induration and erythema develop which reaches a peak at 48–72 h. A positive skin test indicates that the person has been infected with the agent, but it does not necessarily confirm the presence of current disease. Cell-mediated immunity/hypersensitivity also develops in many viral infections including mumps, herpes and, to some extent, measles. We have use in this report the DTH test to assess the cellular immune responses elicited by mRNA vaccines to COVID-19. [13]
Whereas the current successful human antiviral vaccines, such as influenza and measles vaccines, depend largely on the induction of antibody responses, emerging evidence suggests the requirement of both antibody-mediated and T cell-mediated immunity for effective protection against SARS-CoV-2 [14,15]. These lines of evidence, together with data suggesting that T cell-mediated immunity generally is a more reliable correlate of vaccine protection than antibody titers in seniors [16], strongly support the inclusion of T cell responses analysis in COVID-19 vaccine design. However, there are several technical and logistical inconvenient to perform these sophisticated cellular immune studies in large populations [17].
To the best of our knowledge, this report describes the first publication of the results obtained using an in vivo method, the classical delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to the intradermal injection of the Spike protein to assess T-cell immune responses in vaccinated individuals. This affordable and simple test would help to answer basic immunogenicity questions on large-scale population vaccine studies.

5. Conclusions

This report describes the first publication of the results obtained using an in vivo method, the classical delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to the intradermal injection of the Spike protein to assess T-cell immune responses in vaccinated individuals. This affordable and simple test would help to answer basic immunogenicity questions on large-scale population vaccine studies.

6. Patents

Y.B and V.M. have filed (79241/P8547) provisional Utility Model applications related to DTH tests for cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2.

Author Contributions

Y.B. and V.M. participated in the conception of the idea and designed the study and drafted the manuscript. I.S.-M., A.F., P.P.-G., R.G.-P. participated in analysis and interpretation of data and revised the manuscript critically. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was self-funding and did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Treatment, communication, and transfer of personal data of all participating subjects comply with the provisions of Law 03/2018 of 5 de December, RG: 2016/679 on protection of personal data. The protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Hospital (CHUC_2020_92) and (CHUC_2021_04). The study is conducted in accordance with the requirements expressed in Law 737/2015 about biomedical research and the Declaration of Helsinki (revised Brazil, October 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank to patients and Fernando Diaz-Espada, former Chief of Immunology Department in Hospital Clínica Puerta de Hierro for rich discussions to improve the project. The authors want to thank the Immunology Laboratory technicians (Tamara MJ Placer, Gloria Camacho, María Romera, Montserrat Padilla) and Allergy registered nurses (Sofia García, Antonio Pérez-Granados, Lila Pérez) for their help with the procedures and dedication.

Conflicts of Interest

Y.B. and V.M. have filed provisional Utility Model applications related to DTH tests for cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Schwarzkopf, S.; Krawczyk, A.; Knop, D.; Klump, H.; Heinold, A.; Heinemann, F.M.; Thümmler, L.; Temme, C.; Breyer, M.; Witzke, O.; et al. Cellular Immunity in COVID-19 Convalescents with PCR-Confirmed Infection but with Undetectable SARS-CoV-2-Specific IgG. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zuo, J.; Dowell, A.C.; Pearce, H.; Verma, K.; Long, H.M.; Begum, J.; Aiano, F.; Amin-Chowdhury, Z.; Hoschler, K.; Brooks, T.; et al. Robust SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity is maintained at 6 months following primary infection. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 22, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Doria-Rose, N.; Suthar, M.S.; Makowski, M.; O’Connell, S.; McDermott, A.B.; Flach, B.; Ledgerwood, J.E.; Mascola, J.R.; Graham, B.S.; Lin, B.C.; et al. Antibody Persistence through 6 Months after the Second Dose of mRNA-1273 Vaccine for Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meo, S.A.; Bukhari, I.A.; Akram, J.; Meo, A.S.; Klonoff, D.C. COVID-19 vaccines: Comparison of biological, pharmacological charac-teristics and adverse effects of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Goel, R.R.; Apostolidis, S.A.; Painter, M.M.; Mathew, D.; Pattekar, A.; Kuthuru, O.; Gouma, S.; Hicks, P.; Meng, W.; Rosenfeld, A.M.; et al. Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals following mRNA vaccination. Sci. Immunol. 2021, 6, eabi6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Barrios, Y.; Franco, A.; Sanchez-Machin, I.; Poza-Guedes, P.; Gonzalez-Perez, R.; Matheu, V. A novel application of delayed-type hipersensitivity reaction to measure cellular immune response in SARS-CoV-2 exposed individuals. Clin. Immunol. 2021, 226, 108730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Meyer, B.; Torriani, G.; Yerly, S.; Mazza, L.; Calame, A.; Arm-Vernez, I.; Zimmer, G.; Agoritsas, T.; Stirnemann, J.; Spechbach, H.; et al. Validation of a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassay. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vidal, C.; Antolín, D.; Reano, M.; Valero, A.; Sastre, J. Safety and Quality Recommendations in Allergy Medicine (Spanish acronym, RESCAL). J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 28, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Badaro, R.; Machado, B.A.S.; Duthie, M.S.; Araujo-Neto, C.A.; Pedral-Sampaio, D.; Nakatani, M.; Reed, S.G. The single recombinant M. tuberculosis protein DPPD provides enhanced performance of skin testing among HIV-infected tuberculosis patients. Amb Express 2020, 10, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Borah, P.; Deb, P.K.; Al-Shar’I, N.A.; Dahabiyeh, L.A.; Venugopala, K.N.; Singh, V.; Shinu, P.; Hussain, S.; Deka, S.; Chandrasekaran, B.; et al. Perspectives on RNA Vaccine Candidates for COVID-19. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poulter, L.; Seymour, G.; Duke, O.; Janossy, G.; Panayi, G. Immunohistological analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity in man. Cell. Immunol. 1982, 74, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nagar, R.; Pande, S.; Khopkar, U. Intradermal tests in dermatology-I: Tests for infectious diseases. Indian J. Derm. Venereol. Leprol. 2006, 72, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pavia, C.S.; Wormser, G.P. COVID-19: Is there a role for Western blots and skin testing for determining immunity and development of a vaccine? Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 98, 115148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sariol, A.; Perlman, S. Lessons for COVID-19 Immunity from Other Coronavirus Infections. J. Immun. 2020, 53, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tay, M.Z.; Poh, C.M.; Rénia, L.; Macary, P.A.; Ng, L.F.P. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Haq, K.; E McElhaney, J. Immunosenescence: Influenza vaccination and the elderly. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 29, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J.M.; Moderbacher, C.R.; Rawlings, S.A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R.S.; et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 2020, 181, 1489–1501.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Evolution of IgG antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in individuals. Sera were obtained on days 0, 10, 20 (after first dose of vaccine) and 35 (2 weeks after second dose of vaccine).
Figure 1. Evolution of IgG antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in individuals. Sera were obtained on days 0, 10, 20 (after first dose of vaccine) and 35 (2 weeks after second dose of vaccine).
Vaccines 09 00575 g001
Figure 2. Delayed-type hypersensitivity cutaneous test. (A). Representative image of DTH skin test in four immunocompetent individuals showing reaction (First line: 35y-o woman; Second line: 51y-o woman; Third line: 48 y-o woman; Fourth line 49y-o. woman) at 6 h (first column), 12 h (second column), 24 h (third column), 36 h (fourth column), and 48 h (fifth column). (B). Representative image of DTH skin test in five immunocompetent individuals. Images show in the first line the skin responses 12 h after DTH performed twenty days after first dose. In second line images show the skin reaction 12 h after DTH performed fifteen days after second dose.
Figure 2. Delayed-type hypersensitivity cutaneous test. (A). Representative image of DTH skin test in four immunocompetent individuals showing reaction (First line: 35y-o woman; Second line: 51y-o woman; Third line: 48 y-o woman; Fourth line 49y-o. woman) at 6 h (first column), 12 h (second column), 24 h (third column), 36 h (fourth column), and 48 h (fifth column). (B). Representative image of DTH skin test in five immunocompetent individuals. Images show in the first line the skin responses 12 h after DTH performed twenty days after first dose. In second line images show the skin reaction 12 h after DTH performed fifteen days after second dose.
Vaccines 09 00575 g002
Table 1. Diameter of DTH skin reaction in all 28 individuals at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after intradermal test puncture according to the reports of the photographic impressions sent by the patients.
Table 1. Diameter of DTH skin reaction in all 28 individuals at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after intradermal test puncture according to the reports of the photographic impressions sent by the patients.
Hour12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
66141481066814108100886911712146678068
121212306228910202216244161215152016142212129129916
24201315730612132230172910222622191620192714142222151218
4881415148218922202011122010163416141416121261414188
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrios, Y.; Franco, A.; Sánchez-Machín, I.; Poza-Guedes, P.; González-Pérez, R.; Matheu, V. The Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals. Vaccines 2021, 9, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060575

AMA Style

Barrios Y, Franco A, Sánchez-Machín I, Poza-Guedes P, González-Pérez R, Matheu V. The Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals. Vaccines. 2021; 9(6):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrios, Yvelise, Andres Franco, Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín, Paloma Poza-Guedes, Ruperto González-Pérez, and Victor Matheu. 2021. "The Beauty of Simplicity: Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction to Measure Cellular Immune Responses in RNA-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccinated Individuals" Vaccines 9, no. 6: 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop