Next Article in Journal
Delay and Restricted Access of New Molecules in Turkey Compared to the United States and European Union
Previous Article in Journal
Drug Reformulations and Repositioning in Pharmaceutical Industry and Its Impact on Market Access: Reassessment of Nomenclature
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Benefits of Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis—A Review of NICE Decisions

by
Erpur Adalsteinsson
1,* and
Mondher Toumi
2
1
Novo Nordisk, Vandtarnsvej 114, Søborg, Denmark
2
Department of Decision Science, University Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, Cedex, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2013, 1(1), 21240; https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21240
Submission received: 31 January 2013 / Revised: 25 April 2013 / Accepted: 25 April 2013 / Published: 6 August 2013

Abstract

Objective: Since 2004, the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has required manufacturers to conduct a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) in their technology appraisals. The objective of this review is to assess the cost-effectiveness of different technology appraisals and compare them with the actual decision made by the NICE based on PSA. Methods: The search term ‘probabilistic sensitivity analysis’ was used on the NICE home page (25 January 2012). The appraisals identified in the search were assessed and subjected to further review, if a probability of being cost-effective was provided, regardless of the threshold indicated. If several probabilities were provided, the number provided by the evidence review group was used. If several scenarios were presented, the base case scenario was chosen. Finally, the probabilities of being cost-effective were compared with the actual decision made, which could result in two outcomes: recommended or not recommended. Results: A total of 31 assessments were included for the final review. The results were plotted on a graph to illustrate whether there was a relationship between the PSA outcomes and the final recommendation. The assessments were ranked according to their probability of being cost-effective. Conclusion: A higher probability of a technology being cost-effective was correlated with more positive decision-making. There appeared to be a clear threshold at which technologies with a 40% certainty of being cost-effective tended to be recommended, whereas those below the threshold were not recommended. The reports suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) estimate was not a robust driver of decision-making. A NICE applicant should pay increased attention to the PSA in addition to the ICER estimate.
Keywords: probabilistic sensitivity analysis; NICE; health technology assessment; decision probabilistic sensitivity analysis; NICE; health technology assessment; decision

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adalsteinsson, E.; Toumi, M. Benefits of Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis—A Review of NICE Decisions. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2013, 1, 21240. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21240

AMA Style

Adalsteinsson E, Toumi M. Benefits of Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis—A Review of NICE Decisions. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2013; 1(1):21240. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adalsteinsson, Erpur, and Mondher Toumi. 2013. "Benefits of Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis—A Review of NICE Decisions" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 1, no. 1: 21240. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v1i0.21240

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop