Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(03): 299-304
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-02-0008
Special Topic – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Training Health Professionals in Bioinformatics

Experiences and Lessons Learned
G. López-Campos
1   Medical Bioinformatics Department, National Institute of Health “Carlos III”, Madrid, Spain
,
V. López-Alonso
1   Medical Bioinformatics Department, National Institute of Health “Carlos III”, Madrid, Spain
,
F. Martin-Sanchez
1   Medical Bioinformatics Department, National Institute of Health “Carlos III”, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 07 August 2009

accepted: 06 April 2009

Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: Genomic technologies and particularly bioinformatics have significantly changed biomedical research along the last decade and are being recognized as potential methods for application also in medical practice and public health. There exists a growing need for different collectives of the healthcare sector to receive training in the methods, tools and databases related with these new areas.

Objectives: This paper describes the teaching experience of our department during the last ten years and analyzes past activities designed for teaching bioinformatics to different groups of health professionals. We aim to illustrate the main lessons learned and offer useful clues to other groups interested in setting up training initiatives in bioinformatics for health professionals.

Methods: The group selected several methodologies for the training activities (“face-to-face”, online/e-learning) on the basis of three criteria: 1) the target collective, 2) the contents of the course, and 3) its length. Courses were evaluated and the results are hereby presented and discussed.

Results: National and international training courses on bioinformatics, biomedical informatics and genomics were developed according to specific requirements defined by the profile of each of the targeted health professional group. These activities provided the students with the necessary skills for better understanding the use of bioinformatics tools and databases and the appropriate way of applying them into specific health domains.

Conclusions: The increasing demand of training courses in new technologies related to genomics and bioinformatics by health professionals provides a good opportunity for the development of tailored courses based on their specific needs, expectations and demands geared to bridge the gap between research and practice and facilitating their everyday work.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lenzer J, Brownlee S. Knowing me, knowing you. BMJ 2008; 336 7649 858-860.
  • 2 Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, López-Campos G. Integrating genomics into health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (01) 25-30.
  • 3 Martin-Sanchez F, Iakovidis I, Norager S, Maojo V, de GP, van der LJ. et al. Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37 (01) 30-42.
  • 4 Louie B, Mork P, Martin-Sanchez F, Halevy A, Tarczy-Hornoch P. Data integration and genomic medicine. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (01) 5-16.
  • 5 Yang JY, Yang MQ, Zhu MM, Arabnia HR, Deng Y. Promoting synergistic research and education in genomics and bioinformatics. BMC Genomics 2008; 9 (01) I1.
  • 6 Bakken S, Stone PW, Larson EL. A nursing informatics research agenda for 2008-18: contextual influences and key components. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56 (05) 206-214.
  • 7 Tanaka H, Nakaya J. Research and education for biomedical informatics at Tokyo Medical and Dental University. Yearb Med Inform 2007 pp 157-162.
  • 8 Helms AJ, Bradford KD, Warren NJ, Schwartz DG. Bioinformatics opportunities for health sciences librarians and information professionals. J Med Libr Assoc 2004; 92 (04) 489-493.
  • 9 Kuhn KA, Knoll A, Mewes HW, Schwaiger M, Bode A, Broy M. et al. Informatics and medicine – from molecules to populations. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (04) 283-295.
  • 10 Greenes RA, Panchanathan S, Patel V, Silverman H, Shortliffe EH. Biomedical informatics in the desert – a new and unique program at Arizona State University. Yearb Med Inform 2008 pp 150-156.
  • 11 American Medical Informatics Association.. AMIA 10 ×10 program. http://www.amia.org/10x10. September 9, 2009. Available from: http://www.amia.org/10x10.
  • 12 Feldman SS, Hersh W. Evaluating the AMIA-OHSU 10 ×10 program to train healthcare professionals in medical informatics. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 pp 182-186.
  • 13 Martin-Sanchez F, Pelayo de Santiago I, Carreteo T, Zahlmann G. BIB-GEN. http://bvsisciiies/bib-gen/portada.html 2009 (cited Jun 30, 2009). Available from: http://bvs.isciii.es/bib-gen/portada.html.
  • 14 Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, Valle D, McKusick VA. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Hum Mutat 2000; 15 (01) 57-61.
  • 15 Rebhan M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Prilusky J, Lancet D. GeneCards: integrating information about genes, proteins and diseases. Trends Genet 1997; 13 (04) 163.
  • 16 van Mulligen EM, Cases M, Hettne K, Molero E, Weeber M, Robertson KA. et al. Training multidisciplinary biomedical informatics students: three years of experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (02) 246-254.
  • 17 de la CG, van Mulligen EM, Molero E, Perez-Rey D, Martin L, Crespo J. et al. Education and research in INFOBIOMED, the European Network of Excellence in Biomedical Informatics. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 p 927.
  • 18 Yang JY, Yang MQ, Arabnia HR, Deng Y. Genomics, molecular imaging, bioinformatics, and bio-nanoinfo integration are synergistic components of translational medicine and personalized healthcare research. BMC Genomics 2008; 9 (02) I1.