Virtual Kitchen Test

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Introduction: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on “New Methodologies for Patients Rehabilitation”.

Background: The ecological validity of paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests is currently a matter of debate. Arguments in favor of alternatives indicate that paper-and-pencil forms are unable to account for both mental and functional aspects of cognitive functioning.

Objectives: In this study we developed a new neuropsychological evaluation test – the Virtual Kitchen Test (VKT) – devised to evaluate frontal brain functioning in cognitively impaired individuals. We designed this test according to the rationale of the Trail Making Test (TMT), in order to capture frontal lobe abilities during a more ecologically valid task.

Methods: Forty-nine participants, 25 from a clinical sample of patients diagnosed with Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, plus 24 healthy participants.

Results: Execution errors and task completion time were significantly higher in the clinical sample. Also, scores on the new VKT showed moderate to high positive correlations with scores on the TMT. Furthermore, the overall discriminant performance of the VKT was high for both of its indicators.

Conclusions: Overall results support the ability of the VKT to evaluate frontal lobe functions. The best cut-off scores based on this sample are discussed.

• References

• 1 Salmon D, Bondi M. Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia. Annual Review of Psychology 2009; 60: 257-282.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Woicik P, Moeller S, Klein N, Maloney T, Lukasik T, Yeliosof O. et al. Neuropsychology of Cocaine Addiction: Recent Cocaine Use Masks Impairment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009; 34 (05) 1112-1122.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Moselhy HF. Frontal lobe changes in alcoholism: a review of the literature. Alcohol Alcohol 2001; 32: 357-368.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Oscar-Berman M, Marinkovic K. Alcohol: Effects on neurobehavioral functions and the brain. Neuropsychol Rev 2007; 17: 239-257.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Davies S. et al. Is there cognitive impairment in clinically ´healthy´ abstinent alcohol dependence?. Alcohol Alcohol 2005; 40: 498-503.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Goudriaan AE, Grekin ER, Sher KJ. Decision making and response inhibition as predictors of heavy alcohol use: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011; 35 (06) 1050-1057.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Noël X. et al. Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. Neuropsychol 2007; 21: 778-786.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Pitel A. et al. Changes in the episodic memory and executive functions of abstinent and relapsed alcoholics over a 6-month period. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009; 33: 490-498.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Stavro K, Pelletier J, Potvin S. Widespread and sustained cognitive deficits in alcoholism: a meta-analysis. Addict Biol 2012; 18: 203-213.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Graf C. Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing. The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale. Medsurg Nurs 2008; 17 (05) 343-344.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 2003; 13 (04) 181-197.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Spooner D, Pachana N. Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: A case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 327-337.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Army Individual Test Battery, editors. Manual of Directions and Scoring. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General’s Office; 1944
  Google Scholar
• 14 Reitan RM, Wolfson D. editors The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsycholgical Test Battery: Therapy and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychological Press; 1985
  Google Scholar
• 15 Misdraji E, Gass C. The Trail Making Test and its neurobehavioral components. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010; 32 (02) 159-163.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Frieling H. et al. Psychiatry and informatics: Joining forces to improve mental health. Methods of Information in Medicine 2012; 51: 1-2.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Perneczky R. et al. Impairment of activities of daily living requiring memory or complex reasoning as part of the MCI syndrome. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 158-162.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 World Medical Association. 2013. URL. http:// www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ Archived by WebCite® http://www.webcitation.org/6Oedt5EHt.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Folstein MF. et al. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12: 189-198.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 2000; 55: 1621-1626.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Liu H. et al. Testing Statistical Significance of the Area under a Receiving Operating Characteristics Curve for Repeated Measures Design with Bootstrapping. J Data Science 2005; 3: 257-278.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar