The New Role of Biomedical Informatics in the Age of Digital Medicine

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To reflect on the recent rise of Digital Medicine, as well as to analyse main research opportunities in this area. Through the use of several examples, this article aims to highlight the new role that Biomedical Informatics (BMI) can play to facilitate progress in research fields such as participatory and precision medicine. This paper also examines the potential impact and associated risks for BMI due to the development of digital medicine and other recent trends. Lastly, possible strategies to place BMI in a better position to face these challenges are suggested. Methods: The core content of this article is based on a recent invited keynote lecture delivered by one of the authors (Martin- Sanchez) at the Medical Informatics Europe conference (MIE 2015) held in Madrid in May 2015. Both authors (Lopez-Campos and Martin-Sanchez) have collaborated during the last four years in projects such as the ones described in section 3 and have also worked in reviewing relevant articles and initiatives to prepare this talk. Results and Conclusions: Challenges for BMI posed by the rise of technologically driven fields such as Digital Medicine are explored. New opportunities for BMI, in the context of two main avenues for biomedical and clinical research (participatory and precision medicine) are also emphasised. Several examples of current research illustrate that BMI plays a key role in the new area of Digital Medicine. Embracing these opportunities will allow academic groups in BMI to maintain their leadership, identify new research funding opportunities and design new educational programs to train the next genera -tion of BMI scientists.

• References

• 1 Regalado A. Apple has plans for your DNA. MIT Technology Review 2014 [cited July 19, 2015]. Available from: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/537081/apple-has-plans-for-your-dna/.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Moynihan T. Google takes on the challenge of making robot surgery safer. Wired 2015 [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.wired.com/2015/03/google-robot-surgery.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Barr A, Winslow R. Google’s newest search: cancer cells. The Wall Street Journal. 2014 [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/google-designing-nanoparticles-to-patrol-human-body-for-disease-1414515602.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Herper M. IBM Announces Deals with Apple, Johnson and Johnson, and Medtronic in Bid To Transform Health Care. Forbes 2015 [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2015/04/13/ibm-announces-deals-with-apple-johnson-johnson-andmedtronic-in-bid-to-transform-health-care.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Anderson M, McCleary KK. From passengers to co-pilots: Patient roles expand. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7 (Suppl. 291) 291fs25. Epub 2015/06/13.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Quinlan C. Why I got a QR code tattooed on my sternum. 2014 [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://cancerforchristmas.com/qr-code-tattoo.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Swan M. Health 2050: The Realization of Personalized Medicine through Crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the Participatory Biocitizen. J Pers Med 2012; 2 (Suppl. 03) 93-118. Epub 2012/01/01.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Miller EA, West DM. Where’s the revolution? Digital technology and health care in the internet age. J Health Polit Policy Law 2009; 34 (Suppl. 02) 261-284. Epub 2009/03/12.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Elenko E, Underwood L, Zohar D. Defining digital medicine. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33 (Suppl. 05) 456-461. Epub 2015/05/13.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Martin-Sanchez F, Lopez-Campos G, Gray K. Biomedical Informatics Methods for Personalized Medicine and Participatory Health. Methods in Biomedical Informatics: A Pragmatic Approach. 2014 pp 347-394.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Lupski JR, Gibbs RA. Human genome sequencing in health and disease. Annu Rev Med 2012; 63: 35-61. Epub 2012/01/18.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Cox MJ, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF. Sequencing the human microbiome in health and disease. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22 R1 R88-94. Epub 2013/08/15.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Vrijheid M. The exposome: a new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health. Thorax 2014; 69 (Suppl. 09) 876-878. Epub 2014/06/08.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Eder K, Kalman B. Molecular heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its clinical relevance. Pathol Oncol Res 2014; 20 (Suppl. 04) 777-787. Epub 2014/08/27.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, Jiang L, Lam HY, Chen R. et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 2012; 148 (Suppl. 06) 1293-1307. Epub 2012/03/20.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012; 489 7414 57-74. Epub 2012/09/08.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G, Tonti-Filippini J. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009; 462 7271 315-322. Epub 2009/10/16.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2005; 14 (Suppl. 08) 1847-1850. Epub 2005/08/17.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Jorgensen JT. New era of personalized medicine: a 10-year anniversary. The Oncologist 2009; 14 (Suppl. 05) 557-558. Epub 2009/05/23.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Robinson PN. Deep phenotyping for precision medicine. Hum Mutat 2012; 33 (Suppl. 05) 777-780. Epub 2012/04/17.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Christensen CM, Grossman JH, Hwang J. The innovator’s prescription: a disruptive solution for health care. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009. li 441 pp.
  Google Scholar
• 22 National Research Council (U.S.).. Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011. xiii, 128 pp.
  Google Scholar
• 23 Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New Engl J Med 2015; 372 (Suppl. 09) 793-795. Epub 2015/01/31.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Shenkin BN, Warner DC. Sounding board. Giving the patient his medical record: a proposal to improve the system. New Engl J Med 1973; 289 (Suppl. 13) 688-692. Epub 1973/09/27.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Ferguson T. Group e-PSW.. e-Patients: How they can help us heal health care. 2007 Available from: http://e-patients.net/e-Patients_White_Paper.pdf.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Society for Participatory Medicine. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://participatorymedicine.org.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Journal of Participatory Medicine. [cited 19/07/ 2015]. Available from: http://www.jopm.org.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 deBronkart D. From patient centred to people powered: autonomy on the rise. British Medical Journal 2015; 350: h148. Epub 2015/02/12.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Mullins CD, Vandigo J, Zheng Z, Wicks P. Patient-centeredness in the design of clinical trials. Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2014; 17 (Suppl. 04) 471-475. Epub 2014/06/28.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Quantified Self. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://quantifiedself.com.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Developing a framework to generate evidence of health outcomes from social media use in chronic disease management. Medicine 20 2013; 2 (Suppl. 02) e3. Epub 2014/07/31.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: a literature review and analysis of affordances. J Biomed Inform 2013; 46 (Suppl. 06) 957-969. Epub 2013/05/25.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B. et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007; 45 5, Suppl 1 S3-S11. Epub 2007/04/20.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Therapeutic affordances of social media: emergent themes from a global online survey of people with chronic pain. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (Suppl. 12) e284. Epub 2014/12/24.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F, Lopez-Campos G. Patient-reported outcomes and therapeutic affordances of social media: findings from a global online survey of people with chronic pain. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 01) e20. Epub 2015/01/24.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F, Mantopoulos S, Hogg M. Using Social Media While Waiting in Pain: A Clinical 12-Week Longitudinal Pilot Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2015; 4 (Suppl. 03) e101. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4621.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Almalki M, Gray K, Sanchez FM. The use of self-quantification systems for personal health information: big data management activities and prospects. Health Inf Sci Syst 2015; 3 (Suppl 1 HISA Big Data in Biomedicine and Healthcare 2013 Con) S1. Epub 2015/05/29.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Almalki M, Martin Sanchez F, Gray K. Self-Quantification: The Informatics of Personal Data Management for Health and Fitness. 2013 19/07/2015. Available from: http://networkedsociety.unimelb.edu.au/about/ibes/publications/2013/Self-Quantification.pdf.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Kostanjsek N. Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 (Suppl. 04) S3. Epub 2011/06/03.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Brazma AHP, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spell-man P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge WBCACHC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz VM JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001; 29 (Suppl. 04) 6.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Lopez-Campos GH, Almalki M, Martin-Sanchez F. Proposal for a Standardised Reporting Guideline to Annotate Health-related Self-Quantification Experiments. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014; 202: 79-82. Epub 2014/07/08.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Enabling BioSharing – a report on the Annual Spring Workshop of the HUPO-PSI. Proteomics. 2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Martin Sanchez F, Gray K, Bellazzi R, Lopez-Campos G. Exposome informatics: considerations for the design of future biomedical research information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (Suppl. 03) 386-390. Epub 2013/11/05.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Rappaport SM. Discovering environmental causes of disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66 (Suppl. 02) 99-102. Epub 2011/12/27.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Rappaport SM, Barupal DK, Wishart D, Vineis P, Scalbert A. The blood exposome and its role in discovering causes of disease. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122 (Suppl. 08) 769-774. Epub 2014/03/25.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 INBIOMEDVision. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.inbiomedvision.eu/PDF/Interfaz.pdf.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Lopez-Campos G. Integrating genomics into health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (Suppl. 01) 25-30. Epub 2002/04/06.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 The Human Exposome Project. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://humanexposomeproject.com/.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 HECULES Exposome Research Center. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://emoryhercules.com.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Potera C. The HELIX Project: tracking the exposome in real time. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122 (Suppl. 06) A169. Epub 2014/06/04.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Vrijheid M, Slama R, Robinson O, Chatzi L, Coen M, van den Hazel P. et al. The human early-life exposome (HELIX): project rationale and design. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122 (Suppl. 06) 535-544. Epub 2014/03/13.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 The EXPOsOMICS project. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.exposomicsproject.eu/.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Health and Environment-wide Associations based on Large population Surveys. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.heals-eu.eu.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 New Generis.. Newborns and genotoxic exposure risks. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.newgeneris.org.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 UK Biobank 2015. [cited 2015 cited 30/09/2015]. Available from: http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk.
  PubMed
• 56 Health eHeart. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: https://http://www.health-eheartstudy.org.
  PubMed
• 57 Whitman IR, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Imburgia KE, Maguire C, Bettencourt L. et al. Perceptions, Information Sources, and Behavior Regarding Alcohol and Heart Health. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Epub 2015/06/21.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Barr A. Google’s New Moonshot Project: the Human Body. The Wall Street Journal: The Wall Street Journal. 2014 [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/google-to-collect-data-to-define-healthy-human-1406246214.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Health Data Exploration Project. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://hdexplore.calit2.net/wp.
  PubMed
• 60 Hood L, Price ND. Demystifying disease, democratizing health care. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6 (Suppl. 225) 225ed5. Epub 2014/02/28.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 NIH approves strategic vision to transform National Library of Medicine. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jun2015/od-11.htm.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Biomedical Data Science Initiative. [cited 19/07/ 2015]. Available from: http://med.stanford.edu/bdsi.html.
  PubMed
• 63 Stanford Biomedical Data Science Dept. [cited 19/07/2015]; Available from: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/06/departments-for-emergency-medicine-and-biomedical-data-science.html.
  PubMed
• 64 Hunter P, Chapman T, Coveney PV, de Bono B, Diaz V, Fenner J. et al. A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human: 2012 update. Interface Focus 2013; 3 (Suppl. 02) 20130004. Epub 2014/01/16.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Hunter P, Coveney PV, de Bono B, Diaz V, Fenner J, Frangi AF. et al. A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human in 2010 and beyond. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2010; 368 1920 2595-2614. Epub 2010/05/05.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Martin-Sanchez F, Gray K. Recognition of health informatics in Australian standard classifications for research, occupation and education. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014; 204: 92-97. Epub 2014/08/05.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Spanish Society for Health Informatics – Sociedad Española de Informatica de la Salud. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.seis.es.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Digital Health Association – Asociacion Salud Digital. [cited 19/07/2015]. Available from: http://www.salud-digital.es.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Association of Researchers in eHealth – Asociacion de Investigadores en eSalud. [cited 19/07/ 2015]. Available from: http://www.aiesalud.com.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar