Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2015; 21(7): 2102-2107
Published online Feb 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2102
Liver resection for the treatment of post-cholecystectomy biliary stricture with vascular injury
Marcos V Perini, Paulo Herman, Andre L Montagnini, Jose Jukemura, Fabricio F Coelho, Jaime A Kruger, Telesforo Bacchella, Ivan Cecconello, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
Author contributions: Perini MV and Herman P designed the study, Perini MV collected the data and wrote the paper; Herman P, Montagnini AL, Jukemura J, Coelho FF, Kruger JA, Bacchella T and Cecconello I reviewed the manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Marcos V Perini, MD, PhD, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, 455Av Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil. marcos.perini@usp.br
Telephone: +55-11-26616214 Fax: +55-11-26617560
Received: August 3, 2014
Peer-review started: August 4, 2014
First decision: August 27, 2014
Revised: September 25, 2014
Accepted: November 30, 2014
Article in press: December 1, 2014
Published online: February 21, 2015

Abstract

AIM: To report experience with liver resection in a select group of patients with postoperative biliary stricture associated with vascular injury.

METHODS: From a prospective database of patients treated for benign biliary strictures at our hospital, cases that underwent liver resections were reviewed. All cases were referred after one or more attempts to repair bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic). Liver resection was indicated in patients with Strasberg E3/E4 (hilar stricture) bile duct lesions associated with vascular damage (arterial and/or portal), ipsilateral liver atrophy/abscess, recurrent attacks of cholangitis, and failure of previous hepaticojejunostomy.

RESULTS: Of 148 patients treated for benign biliary strictures, nine (6.1%) underwent liver resection; eight women and one man with a mean age of 38.6 years. Six patients had previously been submitted to open cholecystectomy and three to laparoscopic surgery. The mean number of surgical procedures before definitive treatment was 2.4. All patients had Strasberg E3/E4 injuries, and vascular injury was present in all cases. Eight patients underwent right hepatectomy and one underwent left lateral sectionectomy without mortality. Mean time of follow up was 69.1 mo and after long-term follow up, eight patients are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION: Liver resection is a good therapeutic option for patients with complex postoperative biliary stricture and vascular injury presenting with liver atrophy/abscess in which previous hepaticojejunostomy has failed.

Key Words: Abscess, Atrophy, Benign, Bile ducts, Cholecystectomy, Hepatectomy, Stenosis, Vascular system injury

Core tip: Bile duct injury is a major concern due to its complex treatment and long-term complication rate. Associated vascular injury most commonly occurs during cholecystectomy, but can also occur during bile duct repair. Definitive treatment procedures are challenging due to the association of bile duct and vascular injuries. We describe our experience in treating these complex patients. Liver resection was reserved for patients with Strasberg E3/E4 (hilar stricture) bile duct lesions associated with vascular damage (arterial and/or portal), ipsilateral liver atrophy/abscess, recurrent attacks of cholangitis, and failure of the previous hepaticojejunostomy.



INTRODUCTION

Cholecystectomy is one the most common operations performed nowadays and, despite technical advances and surgical skills (especially in laparoscopic procedures), bile duct injury (BDI) still occurs. The incidence of BDI is approximately 0.2%-0.3% in patients undergoing an open procedure, and 0.5%-0.8% in those undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[1-3]. Despite the low incidence when adopting safe measures (such as the critical view approach, routine intraoperative cholangiogram), BDI can still occur. When dealing with an acute lesion, most general surgeons would not be able to perform an adequate repair, mainly due to lack of surgical expertise. In this scenario, referring the patient to a specialist can avoid further biliary and vascular damage. Some reports have estimated 7% of vascular injuries in autopsy series of individuals who had been submitted to an open cholecystectomy[4]; in patients with diagnosed BDI, however, the incidence is higher, ranging from 12% to 39%[4-7].

When vascular injury (VI) occurs in association with BDI, the classical surgical approach with a Roux en Y bilioenteric anastomosis may not offer good long-term results in some patients. The main reason could be the lack of an adequate arterial blood supply of the repaired duct[8-11]. Instead of complex intrahepatic biliary reconstructions or even liver transplantation (when irreversible parenchyma liver damage has occurred), some authors have advocated liver resection and biliary reconstruction in selected cases with good long-term results[12,13]. The aim of the present study was to report our experience with liver resection in a select group of patients with postoperative bile duct stricture associated with VI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a prospective database of patients treated for benign biliary strictures at our hospital, review of the medical records of patients submitted to liver resection was undertaken. All cases were referred to our center after one or more attempts to repair BDI following cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic).

All cases were discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with radiologists and hepatobiliary surgeons. Patients were evaluated with liver function tests. CT angiogram and MRI cholangiography scans were performed to evaluate liver atrophy and vascular and biliary anatomy. In patients with percutaneous transhepatobiliary drains, cholangiograms were performed in order to assess the biliary anatomy. BDI were classified according to Strasberg’s classification[3].

Liver resection was indicated in patients with Strasberg E3/E4 (hilar stricture) bile duct lesions associated with vascular damage (arterial and/or portal), ipsilateral liver atrophy/abscess, recurrent attacks of cholangitis, and failure of the previous hepaticojejunostomy. None of the patients had signs of liver insufficiency or portal hypertension. The final decision was taken intraoperatively after hilar dissection, cholangiographic evaluation, and liver assessment. Hepaticojejunostomy was performed as high as possible and in a standardized technique as described elsewhere[14]. Only one patient (Table 1) had a right hepatectomy without hepaticojejunostomy (complete right biliary duct lesion with ispilateral liver necrosis due to VI).

Table 1 Patient and procedure characteristics.
CasePrevious surgeriesTime from injury to liver resectionVascular injuryStrasberg’s classificationOperative timeType of liver resection
(n)(mo)(h)
1617RHAE 48RH
2149RHAE 411RH
32204RHAE 47RH
4124RPVE 410RH
5645RHAE 43RH
618RHAE 49RH
7272LPVE 45LLS
8124RHAE 36RH
925RHAE 38RH

Variables examined were gender, number of previous surgical repair attempts, symptoms, type of vascular damage, type of biliary lesion and liver resection, mean operative time, blood transfusion, postoperative complications, length of post-hospital stay, recurrence of symptoms, mean time of follow-up, and complications related to the surgical procedure.

The clinical outcome was evaluated according to the Terblanche classification: grade I = no biliary symptoms, grade II = transitory or no current symptoms, grade III = clearly related symptoms requiring medical therapy, and grade IV = recurrent stricture requiring correction or related to death. Grades I and II represent excellent or good results, grade III represents fair results, and grade IV represents poor results[15].

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2011, a total of 148 patients were treated for benign biliary strictures, and nine (6.1%) underwent liver resection; one man and eight women with a mean age of 38.6 years (range: 27-59 years). All patients underwent cholecystectomy as the first surgical procedure elsewhere; six patients had been submitted to open and three to laparoscopic surgery. The mean number of surgical procedures and mean time before referral to our hospital were 2.4 (range: 1-6) and 49.8 mo, respectively (Table 1).

Cholangitis and jaundice were the most common symptoms in 88.9 and 55.6% of the patients, respectively. Liver abscess was found in one patient and was treated with intravenous antibiotics and percutaneous transhepatobiliary drainage prior to surgery.

All patients had lesions classified as Strasberg E3/E4. Arterial VI was present in seven cases and portal vein injury in two (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography findings. A, B: Computed tomography (CT) angiogram showing right hepatic artery injury in one case (arrow); C, D: CT showing right portal vein injury in another case.

Seven of the patients underwent right hepatectomy with Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy and one underwent left lateral sectionectomy with Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy. Only one patient had a right hepatectomy without hepaticojejunostomy due to a right hepatic artery and right bile duct ligation. The patients’ characteristics and treatment are detailed in Table 1.

The mean operative time was 7.5 h, and four patients did not receive blood transfusions. Postoperative complications were observed in three patients, infection being the most common (peritonitis due to bile leak, wound and central venous catheter-related). One patient underwent reoperation due to peritonitis and developed renal and pulmonary complications that prolonged his hospital stay. The mean postoperative stay was 16.3 d (range: 7-62 d). There was no perioperative mortality.

Mean time of follow-up was 69.1 mo (range: 18-120 mo). Long-term complications were observed in two patients: one with an incisional hernia and another with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (this patient was referred for liver transplantation). Good long-term results were observed in 8/9 patients (Table 2).

Table 2 Postoperative results.
CaseBiliary fistulaLength of hospital stayFollow-upTerblanche grade
(d)(mo)
102012.8I
2162156.8I
307117.2IV
401041.0I
50867.9I
60726.9I
70721.0I
808109.2I
901869.6III
DISCUSSION

Treatment of BDI associated with VI requires a multidisciplinary approach from interventional radiologists, endoscopists, and hepatobiliary surgeons. Therapeutic success depends on patient selection, surgical expertise, and the timing of surgery. Failed attempts to treat this condition are associated with a worse prognosis[16]. The scarcity of evidence in dealing with this uncommon complication and the lack of randomized trials make the patient approach challenging and reliant on personal/single institutional experience.

Nowadays, liver resection can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates in specialized centers[17]. The main indication for liver resection in patients with biliary stricture and preserved liver function is an associated VI leading to recurrent attacks of cholangitis. Some groups emphasize that for the treatment of such a complex condition, liver resection should be attempted before liver transplantation[9,12,18,19]. The rationale for this approach is that by removing the atrophic parenchyma and performing a bilioenteric anastomosis in well-vascularized tissue, good long-term results can be achieved. Moreover, liver resection may prevent future development of biliary malignancy due to biliary stasis and repeated cholangitis[12,13,20]. Beyond that, the removal of the damaged hemiliver with wide exposure of the biliary tree can contribute to the performance of a safe and large anastomosis in non-fibrotic, well-vascularized tissue. In Table 3, we summarize the results of liver resection for BDI associated with VI performed by specialized teams.

Table 3 Outcome results in reported series of liver resections with five or more patients with bile duct injury and vascular injury.
Ref.nMorbidityMortalityGood long-term results
Frilling et al[21]5NS25%NS
Thomson et al[12]862.5%0%100%
de Santibáñes et al[18]933.3%0%NS
Laurent et al[19]1861.1%0%72%
Current series933.3%0%88%

Some patients, due to recurrent attacks of cholangitis, may develop secondary liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension. In this setting, liver transplantation should be considered[13]. However, in some patients with transitory liver dysfunction during cholangitis, definitive treatment with liver resection could be offered, once recovery of normal liver function is observed after infection control. In this select group of patients, liver transplantation could be postponed.

Liver resection in patients with previous hilar manipulation, jaundice, multi-resistant bacterial colonization, malnutrition, coagulation impairment, and long hospitalization can carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. Detailed preoperative work-up, with a multidisciplinary approach (interventional radiologists to drain the obstructed biliary tree, experienced hepatobiliary surgeons to perform an adequate surgical treatment, infectious disease physicians, and dietitians) is essential to a successful outcome[16].

Liver resection for the treatment of complex BDI can lead to good long-term results in 72%-100% of patients[8,18,19,21], results comparable to less-complex injuries treated by hepaticojejunostomy[12,14,19,22,23]. These results are mainly due to the improvement in surgical technique, perioperative care, and a rigorous selection of patients[12,18,19,21,24]. Prior to committing to liver resection, less-aggressive surgical approaches, such as hepaticojejunostomy extending to the left duct, either guided by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography or unguided, should be considered.

Laurent et al[19], in the largest series reported, showed good long-term results of hepatectomy in 94% of patients with BDI and VI. In their opinion, despite a high morbidity rate, liver resection should be attempted before liver transplantation. Thomson et al[12] reported that liver resection can have good results in the majority of patients with BDI and associated VI. In our experience, 1/9 patients was referred for liver transplantation due to chronic liver failure and portal hypertension[12,18].

de Santibáñes et al[13] emphasizes that patients with BDI who developed secondary biliary cirrhosis can be treated with liver transplantation with very good results (one-year survival of 91.7%). On the other hand, organ shortage is a reality, and sparing transplantation in patients with benign lesions that could be treated by resection seems a reasonable choice.

Our experience suggests that hepatic resection may be the optimal approach in well-selected patients in whom previous hepaticojejunostomy has failed before the development of irreversible liver injury. In a select group of patients with complex biliary strictures associated with VI presenting with liver atrophy and/or abscess, liver resection can be a good therapeutic option when performed in a specialized center.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors kindly thank Mr. Michael Fink, Senior Lecturer of Surgery, Melbourne University, Australia, for the English review.

COMMENTS
Background

Bile duct injury (BDI) is a major concern due to its complex treatment and long-term complication rate. Associated vascular injury (VI) most commonly occurs during cholecystectomy but can also occur during bile duct repair attempts.

Research frontiers

The association of BDI and VI makes definitive treatment a challenging procedure. Here, we describe our experience in treating these complex patients.

Innovations and breakthroughs

In this report, we describe our experience in treating patients with BDI and VI. Liver resection was reserved for patients with Strasberg E3/E4 (hilar stricture) bile duct lesions associated with vascular damage (arterial and/or portal), ipsilateral liver atrophy/abscess, recurrent attacks of cholangitis, and failure of the previous hepaticojejunostomy.

Peer-review

This is an excellent paper and important contribution to the body of literature regarding biliary strictures. Although this only applies to a small subset of patients, it is important to be aware of this option in patients with recurrent strictures.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Christensen AM, Marks JM, Puy RV, Uecker JM S- Editor: Gou SX L- Editor: AmEditor E- Editor: Liu XM

References
1.  Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA. Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg. 1993;218:129-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Savassi-Rocha PR, Ferreira JT, Diniz MT, Sanches SR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brazil: analysis of 33,563 cases. Int Surg. 1997;82:208-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Halasz NA. Cholecystectomy and hepatic artery injuries. Arch Surg. 1991;126:137-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Gupta N, Solomon H, Fairchild R, Kaminski DL. Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic artery injuries. Arch Surg. 1998;133:176-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;215:196-202.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000;232:430-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Alves A, Farges O, Nicolet J, Watrin T, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J. Incidence and consequence of an hepatic artery injury in patients with postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures. Ann Surg. 2003;238:93-96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Schmidt SC, Langrehr JM, Raakow R, Klupp J, Steinmüller T, Neuhaus P. Right hepatic lobectomy for recurrent cholangitis after combined bile duct and right hepatic artery injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of two cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387:183-187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Stewart L, Robinson TN, Lee CM, Liu K, Whang K, Way LW. Right hepatic artery injury associated with laparoscopic bile duct injury: incidence, mechanism, and consequences.. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:523-530; discussion 530-531.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 133]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Keleman AM, Imagawa DK, Findeiss L, Hanna MH, Tan VH, Katz MH, Goodwin SC, Lane JS, Vajgrt D, Nguyen T. Associated vascular injury in patients with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2011;77:1330-1333.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Thomson BN, Parks RW, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ. Liver resection and transplantation in the management of iatrogenic biliary injury. World J Surg. 2007;31:2363-2369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  de Santibañes E, Ardiles V, Gadano A, Palavecino M, Pekolj J, Ciardullo M. Liver transplantation: the last measure in the treatment of bile duct injuries. World J Surg. 2008;32:1714-1721.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Cunha JE, Machado MC, Bacchella T, Jukemura J. Surgical treatment of iatrogenic biliary tract injuries: an old technique revisited. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1376-1377; author reply 1377-1378.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Terblanche J, Worthley CS, Spence RA, Krige JE. High or low hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct strictures? Surgery. 1990;108:828-834.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Costamagna G, Familiari P, Tringali A, Mutignani M. Multidisciplinary approach to benign biliary strictures. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007;10:90-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309-318; discussion 318-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  de Santibáñes E, Ardiles V, Pekolj J. Complex bile duct injuries: management. HPB (Oxford). 2008;10:4-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Laurent A, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Watrin T, Rivkine E, Belghiti J. Major hepatectomy for the treatment of complex bile duct injury. Ann Surg. 2008;248:77-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, Lepre L, Cassini D, Miccini M. Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:210-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Frilling A, Li J, Weber F, Frühauf NR, Engel J, Beckebaum S, Paul A, Zöpf T, Malago M, Broelsch CE. Major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tertiary center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:679-685.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Monteiro da Cunha JE, Machado MC, Herman P, Bacchella T, Abdo EE, Penteado S, Jukemura J, Montagnini A, Machado MA, Pinotti HW. Surgical treatment of cicatricial biliary strictures. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:1452-1456.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Mercado MÁ, Franssen B, Dominguez I, Arriola-Cabrera JC, Ramírez-Del Val F, Elnecavé-Olaiz A, Arámburo-García R, García A. Transition from a low: to a high-volume centre for bile duct repair: changes in technique and improved outcome. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:767-773.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Ragozzino A, Lassandro F, De Ritis R, Imbriaco M. Value of MRI in three patients with major vascular injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:443-447.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]