Abstract
In a contour-grouping task, subjects decide whether contour elements belong to the same or different curves. Houtkamp, Spekreijse, and Roelfsema (2003) demonstrated that objectbased attention spreads gradually over contour elements that have to be grouped in perception. Crundall, Dewhurst, and Underwood (2008) challenged this spreading-attention model and suggested that attention in the contour-grouping task is not object based but rather has the shape of a zoom lens that moves along the relevant curve. To distinguish between object-based and spatial attention, they changed the stimulus and measured the impact on performance. Subjects were not able to correct for changes at the start of the relevant curve toward the end of the trial. They suggested that attention did not stay at the beginning of the curve, in accordance with a moving zoom lens model. Here, we examine the task of Crundall et al. and find that subjects perceive the changes but fail to correct their response. By measuring change detection directly, we find that performance is much better for the start of the relevant curve than for an irrelevant curve, at all times. Our findings do not support the zoom lens model but provide further support for the spreadingattention model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1604–1612.
Banks, W. P., & Prinzmetal, W. (1976). Configurational effects in visual information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 361–367.
Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145–162.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011–1036.
Brincat, S. L., & Connor, C. E. (2006). Dynamic shape synthesis in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Neuron, 49, 17–24.
Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 992–1003.
Crundall, D., Dewhurst, R., & Underwood, G. (2008). Does attention move or spread during mental curve tracing? Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 374–388.
Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 561–570.
Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448–456.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 897–918.
Houtkamp, R., Spekreijse, H., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2003). A gradual spread of attention during mental curve tracing. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1136–1144.
Hung, C. P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science, 310, 863–866.
Jolicoeur, P., & Ingleton, M. (1991). Size invariance in curve tracing. Memory & Cognition, 19, 21–36.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., & Mackay, M. (1986). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations. Memory & Cognition, 14, 129–140.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., & Mackay, M. (1991). Visual curve tracing properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 997–1022.
Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141–221.
Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267–284.
Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52–66.
McCormick, P. A., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Manipulating the shape of distance effects in visual curve tracing: Further evidence for the zoom lens model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 1–24.
Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1992). Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. Journal of Neurophysiology, 68, 70–84.
Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Modeling visual recognition from neurobiological constraints. Neural Networks, 7, 945–972.
Pooresmaeili, A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2010). Neuronal activity in area V1 during contour grouping conforms to a growth cone model of object-based attention. Manuscript in preparation.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197.
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611–647.
Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 842–853.
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Are cortical models really bound by the “binding problem”? Neuron, 24, 87–93.
Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 203–227.
Roelfsema, P. R., Khayat, P. S., & Spekreijse, H. (2003). Subtask sequencing in the primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 5467–5472.
Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Objectbased attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature, 395, 376–381.
Roelfsema, P. R., Scholte, H. S., & Spekreijse, H. (1999). Temporal constraints on the grouping of contour segments into spatially extended objects. Vision Research, 39, 1509–1529.
Roelfsema, P. R., & Spekreijse, H. (2001). The representation of erroneously perceived stimuli in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 31, 853–863.
Roelfsema, P. R., Tolboom, M., & Khayat, P. S. (2007). Different processing phases for features, figures, and selective attention in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 56, 785–792.
Rousselet, G. A., Macé, M. J.-M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2003). Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 3, 440–455.
Scholte, H. S., Spekreijse, H., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2001). The spatial profile of visual attention in mental curve tracing. Vision Research, 41, 2569–2580.
Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 132–144.
Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41–51.
Sugase, Y., Yamane, S., Ueno, S., & Kawano, K. (1999). Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature, 400, 869–872.
Tanaka, K. (1993). Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science, 262, 685–688.
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.
Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B. H., & Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670–674.
Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, & Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316–320.
Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31–49.
Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25–43.
Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 194–202.
Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295–340.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by an HFSP Investigators Grant, a grant from the European Union (EU IST Cognitive Systems, Project 027198 “Decisions in Motion”), a grant of NWO Exact, and an NWO VICI grant awarded to P.R.R.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roelfsema, P.R., Houtkamp, R. & Korjoukov, I. Further evidence for the spread of attention during contour grouping: A reply to Crundall, Dewhurst, and Underwood (2008). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 849–862 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.849
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.849