Abstract
In the present study, we reexamined the effect of word length (number of letters in a word) on lexical decision. Using the English Lexicon Project, which is based on a large data set of over 40,481 words (Balota et al., 2002), we performed simultaneous multiple regression analyses on a selection of 33,006 English words (ranging from 3 to 13 letters in length). Our analyses revealed an unexpected pattern of results taking the form of a U-shaped curve. The effect of number of letters was facilitatory for words of 3–5 letters, null for words of 5–8 letters, and inhibitory for words of 8–13 letters. We also showed that printed frequency, number of syllables, and number of orthographic neighbors all made independent contributions. The length effects were replicated in a new analysis of a subset of 3,833 monomorphemic nouns (ranging from 3 to 10 letters), and also in another analysis based on 12,987 bisyllabic items (ranging from 3 to 9 letters). These effects were independent of printed frequency, number of syllables, and number of orthographic neighbors. Furthermore, we also observed robust linear inhibitory effects of number of syllables. Implications for models of visual word recognition are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., &Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multipletrace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.Psychological Review,105, 678–723.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2; CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., &Treiman, R. (2002).The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. St. Louis: Washington University. Available at elexicon.wustl.edu.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., &Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 283–316.
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., &Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm.Reading & Writing,17, 411–431.
Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. (in press). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
Doggett, D., &Richards, L. (1975). A reexamination of the effect of word length on recognition thresholds.American Journal of Psychology,88, 583–594.
Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 142–148.
Ferrand, L., &New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming.Acta Psychologica,113, 167–183.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 401–410.
Hudson, P. T. W., &Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 46–58.
Juhasz, B. J., &Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1312–1318.
Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 203–208.
McGinnies, E., Comer, P. B., &Lacey, O. L. (1952). Visual- recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 65–69.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nazir, T. [A.], Ben-Boutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A., &Frost, R. (2004). Reading habits, perceptual learning, and the recognition of printed words.Brain & Language,88, 294–311.
Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., &O’Regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,26, 810–821.
Newbigging, P. L., &Hay, J. (1962). The practice effect in recognition threshold determinations as a function of word frequency and length.Canadian Journal of Psychology,16, 177–184.
O’Regan, J. K., &Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 185–197.
Perry, C., &Ziegler, J. C. (2002). A cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 990–1001.
Postman, L., &Adis-Castro, G. (1957). Psychophysical methods in the study of word recognition.Science,125, 193–194.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., &Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1188–1200.
Richards, L. G., &Heller, F. P. (1976). Recognition thresholds as a function of word length.American Journal of Psychology,89, 455–466.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1976). The effects of stimulus attributes on latency of word recognition.British Journal of Psychology,67, 315–325.
Spieler, D. H., &Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level.Psychological Science,8, 411–416.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., &Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 583–600.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 439–456.
Whitney, C., &Lavidor, M. (2004). Why word length only matters in the left visual field.Neuropsychologia,42, 1680–1688.
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., &Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages.Psychological Science,12, 379–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
New, B., ferrand, L., pallier, C. et al. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 45–52 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193811
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193811