Abstract
In the present study, we examined whether it is easier to judge when an object will pass one’s head if the object’s surface is textured. There are three reasons to suspect that this might be so: First, the additional (local) optic flow may help one judge the rate of expansion and the angular velocity more reliably. Second, local deformations related to the change in angle between the object and the observer could help track the object’s position along its path. Third, more reliable judgments of the object’s shape could help separate global expansion caused by changes in distance from expansion due to changes in the angle between the object and the observer. We can distinguish among these three reasons by comparing performance for textured and uniform spheres and disks. Moving objects were displayed for 0.5–0.7 sec. Subjects had to decide whether the object would pass them before or after a beep that was presented 1 sec after the object started moving. Subjects were not more precise with textured objects. When the disk rotated in order to compensate for the orientation-related contraction that its image would otherwise undergo during its motion, it appeared to arrive later, despite the fact that this strategy increases the global rate of expansion. We argue that this is because the expected deformation of the object’s image during its motion is considered when time to passage is judged. Therefore, the most important role for texture in everyday judgments of time to passage is probably that it helps one judge the object’s shape and thereby estimate how its image will deform as it moves.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Benjamini, Y., &Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B,51, 289–300.
Bootsma, R. J., &Craig, C. M. (2002). Global and local contributions to the optical specification of time to contact: Observer sensitivity to composite tau.Perception,31, 901–924.
Bootsma, R. J., &Oudejans, R. R. (1993). Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1041–1052.
Brenner, E., van Beers, R. J., Rotman, G., &Smeets, J. B. J. (2006). The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,32, 811–825.
DeLucia, P. R. (2005). Does binocular disparity or familiar size override effects of relative size on judgements of time to contact?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 865–886.
DeLucia, P. [R.], Kaiser, M. K., Bush, J. M., Meyer, L. E., &Sweet, B. T. (2003). Information integration in judgements of time to contact.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 1165–1189.
Gray, R., &Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information.Vision Research,38, 499–512.
Gray, R., &Regan, D. (2000). Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object.Vision Research,40, 49–63.
Gray, R., &Sieffert, R. (2005). Different strategies for using motionin-depth information in catching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 1004–1022.
Kaiser, M. K., &Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-topassage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1028–1040.
Kerzel, D., Hecht, H., &Kim, N.-G. (1999). Image velocity, not tau, explains arrival-time judgments from global optical flow.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1540–1555.
Lee, D. N., Georgopoulos, A. P., Clark, M. J. O., Craig, C. M., &Port, N. L. (2001). Guiding contact by coupling the taus of gaps.Experimental Brain Research,139, 151–159.
Lee, D. N., &Lishman, R. (1977). Visual control of locomotion.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,18, 224–230.
Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S., &Clayton, T. M. H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 333–346.
Li, F.-X., &Laurent, M. (1995). Occlusion rate of ball texture as a source of velocity information.Perceptual & Motor Skills,81, 871–880.
López-Moliner, J., &Bonnet, C. (2002). Speed of response initiation in a time-to-contact discrimination task reflects the use of ŋ.Vision Research,42, 2419–2430.
López-Moliner, J., Brenner, E., &Smeets, J. B. J. (2004). The role of texture in judging time-to-contact [Abstract].Perception,33(Suppl.), 20.
Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C., &Vaina, L. M. (1995). Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion.Nature,376, 507–509.
Peper, L., Bootsma, R. J., Mestre, D. R., &Bakker, F. C. (1994). Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 591–612.
Regan, D. (2002). Binocular information about time to collision and time to passage.Vision Research,42, 2479–2484.
Regan, D., &Hamstra, S. J. (1993). Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion.Vision Research,33, 447–462.
Rushton, S. K., &Wann J. P. (1999). Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch.Nature Neuroscience,2, 186–190.
Scott, M. A., Li, F.-X., &Davids, K. (1996). The shape of things to come: Effects of object shape and rotation on the pickup of local tau.Ecological Psychology,8, 343–352.
Scott, M. A., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., &Oudejans, R. R. D. (2004). Object rotation effects on the timing of a hitting action.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,75, 130–137.
Smith, M. R., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., &Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 395–410.
Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 795–810.
Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 865–876.
Tresilian, J. R. (1993). Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing.Perception,22, 653–680.
Vincent, A., &Regan, D. (1997). Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 32–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Moliner, J., Brenner, E. & Smeets, J.B.J. Effects of texture and shape on perceived time to passage: Knowing “what” influences judging “when”. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 887–894 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193925
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193925