Abstract
Conditioning-specific reflex modification (CRM) of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response (NMR) describes changes in responding to an unconditioned stimulus (US) when the rabbit is tested in the absence of the conditioned stimulus. Specifically, after at least 3 days of tone-electrical stimulation pairings, responses to the US increase in size, especially at intensities weaker than the training intensity. CRM is similar to classical conditioning in that it is a function of the strength of conditioning, it can be extinguished, and it can be generalized from one stimulus to another. To compare CRM and classical conditioning further, we conducted three experiments to examine the effects of US intensity (1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mA) on CRM. CRM was weak following conditioning with 1.0 mA and extremely strong following conditioning with 2.0 mA and 4.0 mA. The data suggest that CRM is a function of US intensity and have implications for posttraumatic stress disorder, a disorder potentially modeled by CRM.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brewin, C. R. (2001). A cognitive neuroscience account of posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment.Behaviour Research & Therapy,39, 373–393.
Buck, D. L., Seager, M.A., &Schreurs, B.G. (2001). Conditioning-specific reflex modification of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response: Generality and nature of the phenomenon.Behavioral Neuroscience,115, 1039–1047.
Canli, T., Detmer, W.M., &Donegan, N. H. (1992). Potentiation or diminution of discrete motor unconditioned responses (rabbit eyelid) to an aversive Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus by two associative processes: Conditioned fear and a conditioned diminution of unconditioned stimulus processing.Behavioral Neuroscience,106, 498–508.
Coleman, S. R., &Gormezano, I. (1971). Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,77, 447–455.
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.) (1994). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Dobbs, D., &Wilson, W. P. (1960). Observations on persistence war neurosis.Diseases of the Nervous System,21, 686–691.
Donegan, N. H. (1981). Priming-produced facilitation or diminution of responding to a Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 295–312.
Fitzgerald, R. D., &Teyler, T. J. (1970). Trace and delayed heart-rate conditioning in rats as a function of US intensity.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,70, 242–253.
Flaten, M. A., &Powell, D. A. (1998). Conditioned-reflex facilitation in young and older adults.Experimental Aging Research,24, 387–410.
Gormezano, I. (1966). Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 385–420). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gormezano, I., &Gibbs, C. M. (1988). Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 18–21.
Gruart, A., &Yeo, C. H. (1995). Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: Bilateral regulation of conditioned responses.Experimental Brain Research,104, 431–448.
Ison, J. R., &Leonard, D. W. (1971). Effects of auditory stimuli on the amplitude of the nictitating membrane reflex of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,75, 157–164.
Marcos, J. L., &Redondo, J. (1999). Effects of conditioned stimulus presentation on diminution of the unconditioned response in aversive classical conditioning.Biological Psychiatry,50, 89–102.
Marshall-Goodell, B., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1992). Laws of the unconditioned reflex in the rabbit nictitating membrane preparation.Psychobiology,20, 229–237.
McEchron, M. D., McCabe, P. M., Green, E. J., Llabre, M. M., &Schneiderman, N. (1991). Air puff versus shock unconditioned stimuli in rabbit heart rate conditioning.Physiology & Behavior,51, 195–199.
Nowak, A. J., Goodell-Marshall, B., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1997). Elicitation, modification, and conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response by electrical stimulation in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, inferior olive, interpositus nucleus, and red nucleus.Behavioral Neuroscience,111, 1041–1055.
Pitman, R. K. (1988). Post-traumatic stress disorder, conditioning, and network theory.Psychiatric Annals,18, 182–189.
Powell, D.A. (1994). Rapid associative learning: Conditioned bradycardia and its central nervous system substrates.Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science,29, 109–133.
Schneiderman, N., Smith, M. C., Smith, A. C., &Gormezano, I. (1966). Heart rate classical conditioning in rabbits.Psychonomic Science,6, 241–242.
Schreurs, B. G., &Alkon, D. L. (1990). US-US conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response: Emergence of a conditioned response without alpha conditioning.Psychobiology,18, 312–320.
Schreurs, B. G., Oh, M.M., Hirashima, C., &Alkon, D. L. (1995). Conditioning-specific modification of the rabbit’s unconditioned nictitating membrane response.Behavioral Neuroscience,109, 24–33.
Schreurs, B. G., Shi, T., Pineda, S. I., &Buck, D. L. (2000). Conditioning the unconditioned response: Modification of the rabbit’s (Oryctolagus cuniculus) unconditioned nictitating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,26, 144–156.
Smith, M. C. (1968). CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,66, 679–687.
Weisz, D. J., &McInerny, J. (1990). An associative process maintains reflex facilitation of the unconditioned nictitating membrane response during the early stages of training.Behavioral Neuroscience,104, 21–27.
Weisz, D. J., &Walts, C. (1990). Reflex facilitation of the rabbit nictitating membrane response by an auditory stimulus as a function of interstimulus interval.Behavioral Neuroscience,104, 11–20.
Wikgren, J., Ruusvirta, T., &Korhonen, T. (2002). Reflex facilitation during eyeblink conditioning and subsequent interpositus nucleus inactivation in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Behavioral Neuroscience,116, 1052–1058.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant MH 64715 to B.G.S. and AG20461 to M.A.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seager, M.A., Smith-Bell, C.A. & Schreurs, B.G. Conditioning-specific reflex modification of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response: US intensity effects. Animal Learning & Behavior 31, 292–298 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195990
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195990