Abstract
Effects of morphologically related primes were examined in two masked prime experiments. Responses to both free root and derived suffixed word targets were facilitated when primes were derived suffixed words containing the target’s root, and this facilitation effect showed a time course similar to that for the facilitation effect of repetition primes (though systematically smaller in magnitude). In a control experiment only the longest prime duration of Experiment 1 was used; responses to derived suffixed word targets were facilitated by both free root primes and derived suffixed word primes sharing the target’s root (relative to unrelated and form-related control primes). The free root and derived suffixed word prime conditions did not differ significantly. In Experiment 2, only true derived word primes produced facilitation, whereas morphologically simple primes containing a pseudoroot did not influence performance relative to the unrelated prime condition. We argue that this supports a supralexical account of morphological representation.
Article PDF
References
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation.Language Production,2, 257–295.
Drews, E., &Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1098–1116.
Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Difference between inflections and derivations.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 442–470.
Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698.
Frost, R., Forster, K., &Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1–28.
Grainger, J., Colé, P., &Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 370–384.
Imbs, P. (1971).Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1101–1110.
Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., &Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 333–348.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., &Turvey, M. T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon.Memory & Cognition,8, 415–423.
Manelis, L., &Tharp, D. A. (1977). The processing of affixed words.Memory & Cognition,5, 690–695.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Komisarjevsky-Tyler, L., Waksler, R., &Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.Psychological Review,101, 3–33.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Zhou, X., &Ford, M. (1996). Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.),Yearbook of morphology. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing.Language & Cognitive Processes,9, 271–294.
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 638–647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giraudo, H., Grainger, J. Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 127–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196148
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196148