Abstract
Several experiments examined repetition priming among morphologically related words as a tool to study lexical organization. The first experiment replicated a finding by Stanners, Neiser, Hernon, and Hall (Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 399-412), that whereas inflected words prime their unaffixed morphological relatives as effectively as do the unaffixed forms themselves, derived words are effective, but weaker, primes. The experiment also suggested, however, that this difference in priming may have an episodic origin relating to the less formal similarity of derived than of inflected words to unaffixed morphological relatives. A second experiment reduced episodic contributions to priming and found equally effective priming of unaffixed words by themselves, by inflected relatives, and by derived relatives. Two additional experiments found strong priming among relatives sharing the spelling and pronunciation of the unaffixed stem morpheme, sharing spelling alone, or sharing neither formal property exactly. Overall, results with auditory and visual presentations were similar. Interpretations that repetition priming reflects either repeated access to a common lexical entry or associative semantic priming are both rejected in favor of a lexical organization in which components of a word (e.g., a stem morpheme) may be shared among distinct words without the words themselves, in any sense, sharing a “lexical entry.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronoff, M. (1976).Word formation m generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: M I T. Press.
Berko, J. (1956). The child’s learning of English morphology.Word,14, 50–77
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representations. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production, II. London Academic Press.
CHomsky, N., &Halle, M. (1968).The sound pattern of English. New York. Harper & Row.
Dannenbring, G., &Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect m a lexical decision task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 435–444.
Davelaar, E., &Coltheart, M. (1975). Effects of interpolated items on the association effect in lexlcal decision tasks.Bulletin of the Prychonomtc Societv,6, 269–272.
Dell, G. (1980).Phonological and lexical encoding in sentence productton. An analysis of naturally occurring and experimentally elicited speech errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Dell, G. (1984).A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. (Cognitive Science Technical Report) Rochester, NY University of Rochester.
Feustil, T., Shiffrin, R., &Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,112, 309–346.
Forbach, G. B., Stanners, R. F., &Hochhaus, L. (1974). Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition.2, 337–339.
Forster, K., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation an lexlcal access.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition,10, 680–698.
Garrett, M. (1980a). Levels of processing m sentence producuon ln B Butterworth, (Ed ).Language production I. London. Academic Press.
Garrett, M. (1980b). The limits of accommodation’ Arguments lot independent processing levels m sentence production In V Fromkin (Ed. ),Errors tn linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York. Academic Press.
Gough, P., Alford, J, &Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and context In O Tzeng & H Singer (Eds.),Perception of print. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
Henderson, L. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access In H. Bouma & D Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance, X. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Jacoby, L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,110, 306–340.
Kempley, S. T., &Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology,73, 441–454.
Kirsner, K., Milech, D., &Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon.Memory & Cognition,11, 621–630.
Kučra, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Light, L., &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,9, l-ll.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., &Turvey, M. T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon.Memory & Cognition,8, 415–423.
McClelland, J., &Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. Account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R., & Ruddy, M. (1972).Activation of lexical memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178
Morton, J. (1981). The status of information processing models of language. In H. Longuet-Higgins, J. Lyons, & D. Broadbent (Eds.),The psychological mechanisms of language. London: The Royal Society and the British Association.
Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.
Napps, S. (1985).Morphological, semantic and formal relations among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, Dartmouth College.
Napps, S., & Fowler, C. (1983).Orthographic organization of lexical forms. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association.
Napps, S., Fowler, C., & Feldman, L. (1984).Effects of orthography and phonology on morphological organization of the lexicon. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association.
Ohala, J. (1974). Experimental historical phonology. In J. Anderson & C. Jones (Eds.),Historical linguistics, II: Theoretical description in phonology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Oliphant, G. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition.Australian Journal of Psychology,35, 393–403.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance,3, 1–17.
Selkirk, L. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress.Linguistic Inquiry,11, 563–695.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., &Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.l8, 399–412.
Steinberg, D. (1973). Phonology, reading and Chomsky’s optimal orthographyJournal of Psycholinguistics Research,2, 239–258.
Stemberger, J. (1982).The lexicon in a model of language production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Grant HD 01994 to Haskins Laboratories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowler, C.A., Napps, S.E. & Feldman, L. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition 13, 241–255 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197687
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197687