Abstract
Students with a wide range of course work in physics or music theory read expositions in both domains. After reading 16 texts, each student provided a judgment of confidence in his/her ability to verify inferences based on the central principles of the texts. The primary dependent variable was calibration of comprehension, the degree of association between confidence and performance on the inference test. Two results of most interest were that (1) expertise in a domain was inversely related to calibration and (2) subjects were well calibrated across domains. Both of these results can be accommodated by a self-classification strategy: Confidence judgments are based on self-classification as expert or nonexpert in the domain of the text, rather than on an assessment of the degree to which the text was comprehended. Because self-classifications are not well differentiated within a domain, application of the strategy by experts produces poor calibration within a domain. Nonetheless, because self-classification is generally consistent with performance across domains, application of the strategy produces calibration across domains.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkmire, D. P. (1982).Effect of the interaction of text structure, background knowledge, and purpose on attention to text (Technical Memorandum 6-82) Aberdeen Proving Ground. MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory
Bradley, J. V. (1981). Overconfidence in ignorant experts.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,17, 82–84.
Cohen, J., &Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glenberg, A. M., &Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,11, 702–718.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (in press).Enhancing calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Hock, S. J. (1985). Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,11, 719–731.
Kassin, S. M. (1985). Eyewitness identification: Retrospective self-awareness and the accuracy-confidence correlation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49, 878–893.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., &Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under certainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,10, 756–766.
Maki, R., &Berry, S. (1984). Metacomprehension of text materialJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,10, 663–679.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling of knowing predictions,Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case study judgments.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,29, 261–265.
Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards.Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 248–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was funded by Office of Naval Research Contract No. N0014-85-K-0644 and National Institute of Education Grant No. NIE-G081-0009 to the Wisconsin Center for Education Research Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Education or the Department of Education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glenberg, A.M., Epstein, W. Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition 15, 84–93 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197714
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197714