Abstract
Subjects in Experiment i studied a list of words under varying presentation conditions (visual or auditory) and in two typographies within the visual condition (typed or hand printed) and then received a word-fragment completion test (e.g., —YS—E—Y formystery) in which the test cues also varied in typography. The main findings were that (1) priming occurred for all study items, relative to nonstudied items, but greater priming occurred for visual than for auditory presentation, and (2) performance in the visual conditions was better when typographies matched between study and test than when the typographies mismatched, but only for words studied in hand-printed form. These findings were generally replicated when the test was delayed 1 week, although priming declined across this retention interval (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3 subjects studied words that were either in focus or blurred and showed greater priming when test fragments were presented in the same manner as at study. Priming in the word-fragment completion task depends on matching surface characteristics of items between study and test and exemplifies the requirement of performing similar mental operations at study and test for maximizing performance (transfer-appropriate processing).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaxton, T. A. (1985).Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Clarke, R. &Morton, J. (1983). Cross modality facditation in tachistoscop~c word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 79–96.
Craik, F. I. M. &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Dallett, K. M., Wilcox, S. G. &D’Andrea, L. (1968). Picture memory experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 312–320.
Durgunoglu, A. &Roediger, H. L. (1987). Test differences in accessing bilingual memory.Journal of Memory & language,26, 377–391.
Gardiner, J. (in press). Generation and priming effects in word fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Gardiner, J. M. &Gregg, V. H. (1979). When auditory memory is not overwritten.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 705–719.
Graf, P. &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., Mandler, G. &Haden, P. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects.Science,218, 1243–1244.
Graf, P, & Schcter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychalogy: Learning, memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Graf, P., Squire, L. R. &Mandler, G. (1984). The information that anmesic patients do not forget.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,10, 164–178.
Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P. &Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function m amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,11, 386–396.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L. &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L. &Hayman, C. A. G. (1987). Specific visual transfer in word identification: Effects of word shape.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,13, 456463.
Jacoby, L. L., 8, Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 300–324.
Johnston, W. H., Dark, V. J. &Jacoby, L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,ll, 3–11.
Kirsner, K. (1974). Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 579–584.
Kirsner, K. &Dunn, J. C. (1985). The perceptual record: A common factor in repetition priming and attribute retention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Mechanisms of attention: Attention and performance X1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kirsner, K., Milech, D. &Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon.Memory & Cognitton,ll, 621–630.
Kolers, P. A. (1975). Specificity of operations in sentence recognition.Cognitive Psychology,7, 289–306.
Kolers, P. A. (1976). Reading a year later.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 554–565.
Kolers, P. A. &Perkins, O. N. (1975). Spatial and ordinal components of form perception and literacy.Cognitive Psychology,7, 228–267.
Kolers, P. A. &Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 425–449.
Komatsu, S. I. &Ohta, N. (1984). Priming effects in word fragment completion for short- and long retention intervals.Japanese Psychological Research,26, 194–200.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Masson, M. E. J. (1986). Identification of typographically transformed words: Instance-based skill acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,12, 479–488.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language I. New York: Plenum Press.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Roediger, H. L. &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.)Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbing-haus Centennial Conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L. &Weldon, M. S. (1987). Reversing the picture superiority effect. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sachs, J. D. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 437–442.
Shimamura, A. (1986). Priming effects in anmesia: Evidence for a dissociable memory function.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 619–644.
Sloman, S. A., Hayman, C. A. G., Ohta, N., Law, J. & Tulving, E. (in press). Forgetting in primed fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L. &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Tulving, E. &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Warrington, E. K. &Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval?Nature,228, 629–630.
Weldon, M. S. &Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 269–280.
Winnick, W. A. &Daniel, S. A. (1970). TWO kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,84, 74–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant ROI HD-15054 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roediger, H.L., Blaxton, T.A. Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory & Cognition 15, 379–388 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197728
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197728