Abstract
The reliable finding that trait judgments of faces yield better recognition memory than do feature judgments of faces is conceptualized as an encoding-specificity effect. Specifically, both trait-judgment encodings of faces and face-recognition tests are argued to be holistic, involving topographical information with between-feature processing. Consistent with the concept that encoding and retrieval operations interact to produce retrieval success, it was expected that a memory-for-face test using the Identi-kit (which requires reconstructions of the face at a feature level of analysis) would show trait-encoding tasks to be inferior to feature-encoding tasks. Eighty subjects were assigned randomly to judge a face on 10 trait dimensions (e.g., honesty-dishonesty) or on 10 feature dimensions (e.g., narrow nose-wide nose) and subsequently attempted to recognize the target among five distractors or to reconstruct the face from an Identi-kit. The significant interaction between encoding and retrieval operations indicated that the face was best identified under trait-encoding conditions but best reconstructed under feature-encoding conditions. The match between trait encoding and recognition in yielding high memory performance suggests strongly that trait judgments foster holistic processing of faces (i.e., interfeature topographical information is p-art of the context) and that the recognition of faces also is holistic. Finally, the utility of the feature- vs. holistic-processing distinction is questioned, and an alternative is proposed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Applied cognitive and cognitive applied psychology: The case of face recognition. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bekerian, D. A., &Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,9, 139–145.
Bower, G. H., &Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 751–757.
Bower, G. H., Monteiro, K. P., &Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context in learning and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,17, 573–585.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Ellis, H. D., Shephard, J. W., &Davies, G. M. (1975). An investigation of the use of the Photofit technique for recalling faces.British Journal of Psychology,66, 29–37.
Fisher, R. P., &Craik, F. I. M. (1977). The interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 701–711.
Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review,85, 153–171.
Goldstein, A. G., Johnson, K. S., &Chance, J. (1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,13, 15–18.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Erlbaum.
Laughery, K. R., &Fowler, R. F. (1980). Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces.Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 307–316.
Mueller, J. H., Carlomusto, M., &Goldstein, A. G. (1978). Orienting task and study time in facial recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 313–316.
Patterson, K. E., &Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 406–417.
Strnad, B. N., &Mueller, J. H. (1977). Levels of processing in facial recognition memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,9, 17–18.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Warrington, E. K., &Ackroyd, C. (1975). The effect of orienting tasks on recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,3, 140–142.
Winograd, E. (1976). Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,8, 419–421.
Winograd, E. (1978). Encoding operations which facilitate memory across the life span. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press.
Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 181–190.
Wolfskiel, M. P., &Brigham, J. C. (1983).Prior description and face recognition. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, Department of Psychology, Tallahassee, FL.
Woodhead, M. M., Baddeley, A. D., &Simmonds, D. C. V. (1979). On training people to recognize faces.Ergonomics,22, 333–343.
Yarmey, A. D. (1979).The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the first author and was conducted by the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, G.L., Hryciw, B. Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory & Cognition 12, 338–344 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198293
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198293