Abstract
Three prominent modifications of Stevens’ power law, designed to account for the curvature at low stimulus intensities, were examined in the light of previously reported inverse attribute functions and five new experiments scaling loudness and softness by magnitude estimation. One hundred and seven students served as observers in the five experiments. Lack of curvature in the inverse functions at low stimulus intensities, plus the lack of parameter invariance, pointed to the inadequacy of the effective threshold and physiological noise modifications. The additive constant model of zero-point response bias, previously advanced by Irwin and Corballis (1968)and McGill (1960)was found more satisfactory. A discussion of the implications of the research findings for subsequent formulations of the modified power law was included.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dawson, W. E.. &Mirando, M. Inverse scales of opinion obtained by sensory-modality matching.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 42, 415–425.
Eisler, H. Empirical test of a model relating magnitude and category scales.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1962.3, 88–96.
Eisler, H. The ceiling of psychophysical power functions.American Journal of Psychology, 1965,78, 506–509.
Ekman, G. Weber’s law and related functions.Journal of Psychology. 1959,47, 343–352.
Ekman, G. Methodological note on scales of gustatory intensity.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1961,2, 185–190.
Fagot, R. F. Alternative power laws for ratio scaling.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 201–214.
Fagot, R. F. A note on the form of the psychophysical function near threshold.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 665–667.
Fagot, R. F., &Stewart, M. R. An experimental comparison of stimulus and response translated power functions for brightness.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,3, 297–305.
Gescheider, G. A.Psychophysics: Method and theory. Hillsdale. N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Irwin, R. J., &Corballis, M. C. On the general form of Stevens’ law for loudness and softness.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968.3, 137–143.
John, I. D. The properties of distributions of magnitude estimates of loudness and softness.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 1971,12,261–2700.
Krantz, D. H. Threshold theories of signal detection.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 308–324.
Lochner, J. P. A.., &Burger, J. F. Form of the loudness function in the presence of masking noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1961,33, 1705–1707.
Marks, L. E.Sensory processes: The new psychophysics, New York: Academic Press. 1974.
Marks, L. E.. &Stevens, J. C. The form of the psychophysical function near threshold.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,4, 315–318.
Mattiello, M. L. F., &Guirao, M. Direct estimation of lightness of surface colors.Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1974,64, 206–209.
McGill, W. A. The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley. 1960.
Robertson, P. Category judgements and magnitude estimations. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Auckland, 1966.
Rule, S. J.. &Curtis, D. W. Reevaluation of two models for judgments of perceptual intervals.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 433–436.
Rule, S. J., Laye, R. c., &Curtis, D. W. Magnitude Judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1108–1114.
Scharf, B.. &Stevens, J. C. The form of the loudness function near threshold. InProceedings 3rd International Congress of Acoustics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1961. Pp. 80–82.
Schneider, B., &Lane, H. Ratio scales, category scales. and variability in the production of loudness and softness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1953–1961.
Schneider, B. A.. &Lane, H. L. Note on the variability hypothesis in category scaling.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 1958.
Stevens, S. S. The measurement of loudness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955,27, 815–820.
Stevens, S. S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes—loudness.American Journal of Psychology, 1956,69, 1–25.
Stevens, S. S. Sensation measurement by Inverse judgments.Science, 1962,136, 329.
Stevens, S. S. On predicting exponents for cross-modality matches.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 251–256.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 426–450.
Stevens, S. S. Perceived level of noise by Mark VII and decibels (E).Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 575–601.
Stevens, S. S.Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley. 1975.
Stevens, S. S.. &Guirao, M. Loudness. reciprocality, and partition scales.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962,34, 1466-1471.Stevens, S. S., & Guirao, M. Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,66, 177-186.Stevens, S. S., & Harris, J. R. The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 489–494.
Torgerson, W. S. Quantitative judgment scales. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960.
Ward. L. M.Some psychophysical properties of category judgments and magnitude estimations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Duke University, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A preliminary report of this paper was read at the Ninth Annual Mathematical Psychology Meetings, New York University, New York City, August 1976. Portions of this paper are based on experimental data taken from the second author’s unpublished MA thesis, which was completed at the University of Notre Dame.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawson, W.E., Miller, M.E. Inverse attribute functions and the proposed modifications of the power law. Perception & Psychophysics 24, 457–465 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199744
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199744