Abstract
In the present study, the gap paradigm originally developed by Watson and Humphreys (1997) was used to investigate whether the process of visual marking can influence the perceptual salience of a target in visual search. Consistent with previous studies (Watson & Humphreys, 1997), the results showed that search was not affected by the presence of the preceding distractors when the target was relatively low in salience. This finding suggests that visual marking can increase the efficiency of visual search by decreasing the size of the search set. However, more important, the results also showed that search was affected by the presence of the preceding distractors when the target was relatively high in salience. This finding suggests that visual marking may be limited in its ability to increase the perceptual salience of the target. Together, the results of the present study suggest that the effectiveness of visual marking may vary as a function of search context.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Braun, J. (1998). Divided attention: Narrowing the gap between brain and behavior. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.),The attentive brain (pp. 327–352). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Desimone, R., Schein, S. G., Moran, J., &Ungerleider, L. G. (1985). Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex.Vision Research,25, 441–452.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
D’Zmura, M. (1991). Color in visual search.Vision Research,31, 951–966.
Enns, J., &Di Lollo, V. (1996). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations.Psychological Science,8, 135–139.
Gibson, B. S., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search.Psychological Science,9, 176–182.
Horowitz, T., &Wlfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory.Nature,394, 575–577.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to inhibition. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Knierim, J. J., &Van Essen, D. C. (1992). Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert Macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology,67, 961–980.
Nagy, A. L., &Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences determined with a visual search task.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,7, 1209–1217.
Nakayama, K., &Joseph, J. S. (1998). Attention, pattern recognition, and pop-out in visual search. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.),The attentive brain (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 130–134.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 401–437.
Treisman, A. (1994). The perception of features and objects. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 5–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–74). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research was supported by Grant SBR-9817245 from the National Science Foundation awarded to B.S.G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, B.S., Jiang, Y. Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 59–73 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200503
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200503