Abstract
Frequency theories of concept learning assume that people count how often features occur among instances of a concept, but different versions make various assumptions about what features they count. According to the basic feature model, only basic features are counted, whereas according to the configural model, basic features and configural features (all combinations of basic features) are counted. Two experiments assessed the predictions of both versions of frequency theory. Subjects viewed schematic human faces, which included both positive and negative instances of the concept to be learned, and then provided typicality ratings, classification responses, and frequency estimates of configural features, basic features, and whole exemplars. Because both models assume that basic features are counted, they make the same predictions in many situations. Here, the basic feature estimation and whole exemplar tests were designed such that both models make the same predictions, whereas the typicality rating, classification, and confignral feature estimation tests were designed to distinguish between the models. The pattern of results clearly supported the basic feature version of frequency theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Anderson, J. R., &Paulson, R. Interference in memory for pictorial information.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 178–202.
Begg, I. Estimation of word frequency in continuous and discrete tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1046–1052.
Bourne, L. E., Jr.,Ekstrand, B. R., Lovallo, W. R., Kellogg, R. T., Hiew, C. C., &Yaroush, R. A. Frequency analysis of attribute identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976,105, 294–312.
Carey, S., &Diamond, R. From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.Science, 1977,195, 312–314.
Chumbley, J. I., Sala, L. S., &Bourne, L. E., Jr. Bases of acceptability ratings in quasinaturalistic concept tasks.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 217–226.
Franrs, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 65–74.
Garner, W. R.The processing of information and structure. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974.
Garner, W. R. Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 98–123.
Goldman, D., &Homa, D. Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability, and experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 375–385.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Hayes-Roth, F. Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 321–328.
Kellogo, R. T. Simple feature frequency versus feature validity models of prototype formation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980,51, 295–306. (a)
Kellogg, R. T. Feature frequency and hypothesis testing in the acquisition of rule-governed concepts.Memory & Cognition, 1980,8, 297–303. (b)
Kellogg, R. T., Bourne, L. E., Jr., &Ekstrand, B. R. Feature frequency and the acquisition of natural concepts.American Journal of Psychology, 1978,91, 211–222.
Lasky, R. E., &Kallio, K. D. Transformational rules in concept learning.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 491–495.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 207–238.
Neumann, P. G. An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 241–248.
Neumann, P. G. Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 187–197.
Reed, S. K. Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 382–407.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 194–207.
Rock, I. The perception of disoriented faces.Scientific American, 1974,230, 78–86.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 573–605.
Saavedea, M. A. Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 314–326.
Smith, E. E., &Nielson, G. D. Representations and retrieval processes in short-term memory: Recognition and recall of faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,85, 397–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted at the Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior at the University of Colorado. The work was supported by a research grant and a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kellogg, R.T. Feature frequency in concept learning: What is counted?. Mem Cogn 9, 157–163 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202330
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202330