Abstract
Four experiments investigated a new phenomenon: the existence of a very large switching time effect that occurs from rapidly alternating between overt and covert (mouthed) speech. This is referred to as an intensity switching effect, and the time taken for each switch is, in itself, long enough for a spoken or mouthed character (letter or digit) to be produced. In Experiments 1 and 2, the intensity switching effect was shown to be different from the switching that occurs between categories of materials (letters and digits) because it is both much larger and much more resistant to practice effects. The intensity switching effect was also shown to be distinct from a memory load effect, since it holds even for perceptually available lists. In Experiments 3 and 4, the issue of a peripheral vs. a central origin of intensity switching was addressed. Evidence was found for a central origin. In addition, two models -of response intensity representation were contrasted: a symbolic or digital model, with intensity altered by parameter substitution, and an analog model, with intensity represented by a moving pointer on an intensity continuum. The results supported the symbolic model. It is concluded that the intensity switching effect is a measure of control processes at work in altering the intensity parameters of the vocal response system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blagowsky, J. D.Metered memory search with concurrent response switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1971.
Broadbent, D. E.Decision and stress. London: Academic Press, 1971.
Kaplan, H. M.Anatomy and physiology of speech. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Keele, S. W. Behavioral analysis of movement. In V. Brooks (Ed.),Handbook of physiology: Section 1: The nervous system (Vol 2).Motor control (Pt. 2). Baltimore, Md: American Physiological Society, 1981.
Kelso, J. Contrasting perspectives on order and regulation in movement. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1981.
Kerr, B. Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.),Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Kosslyn, S. M., &Pomerantz, J. R. Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 52–76.
Licklider, J. C. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951.
Mackay, D. G. The problem of rehearsal or mental practice.Journal of Motor Behavior, 1981,13, 274–285.
Polya, G.Patterns of plausible inference (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.
Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980,32, 3–25.
Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. I., &Wright, C. E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.),Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Weber, R. J., &Bach, M. Visual and speech imagery.British Journal of Psychology, 1969,60, 199–202.
Weber, R. J., &Blagowsky, J. Metered memory search and concurrent chanting.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 162–170.
Weber, R. J., &Castleman, J. The time it takes to imagine.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,8, 165–168.
Weber, R. J., Hochhaus, L., &Brown, W. D. Equivalence of perceptual and imaginal representation: Developmental changes. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1981.
Wickelgren, W. A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics.Acta Psychologica, 1977,41, 67–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant to R. J. Weber from the Education Research Foundation, Oklahoma State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, R.J., Blagowsky, J. & Mankin, R. Switching time between overt and covert speech: Generative attention. Mem Cogn 10, 546–553 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202437