Abstract
Previous experimental data on the roughness of grooved aluminum tiles provide a data base against which to test theories of roughness perception. A model based on the static deformation of the skin touching the stimulus tile is developed, and 11 parameters of the deformation are individually compared with the experimental data. All parameters were tested first in an approximate way, and then the better parameters were recalculated in a more exact manner. Three parameters, the depth to which the finger penetrates the groove, the cross-sectional area of the finger within the groove, and the cross-sectional area of the deviation of the skin from its resting position, all predict the roughness well as a function of finger force and groove width. The last of the three predicts roughness best as a function of land width, and is tentatively preferred as “the stimulus for roughness.” All predictions from the static model indicate that variation of the coefficient of friction between skin and tile should have little or no effect. This counterintuitive prediction was confirmed by an experiment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ekman, G., Hosman, J., &Lindstrom, B. Roughness, smoothness and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,70, 18–26,
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., &Sands, M.The Feynman lectures on physics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1965.
Goff, G. D. Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 294–299.
Katz, D. Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch).Zeitschrift Psychologie. 1925,11, I-XII and 1–270.
Lederman, S. J. The perception of surface roughness by touch Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Toronto, 1973.
Lederman, S. J. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and micro-surface structure.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974.16, 385–305.
Lederman, S. J., &Taylor, M. M. Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touchPerception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 401–408.
Moore, T. J., &Mundie, J. R. Measurement of specific mechanical impedance of the skin: Effects of static force, site of stimulation, area of probe, and presence of a surround.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,52, 577–584.
Pollack, I. Neutralization of stimulus bias in auditorry rating scales.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 1272–1270.
Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review, 1957,64, 153–181.
Taylor, M. M., Lederman, S J, &Gibson, R. H. Tactual perception of texture. In E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Tregear, R. T.The physical functions of the skin. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
Verrillo, R. T. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1962–1966.
Von Gifrke, H. E, Oestreicher, H. L, Franke, E. K., Parrack, H. O., &von Wittern, W. W. Physics of vibration in living tissues.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1952,4, 886–900.
Yamada, H. In F. G. Evans (Ed.),Strength of biological materials. Baltimore: Williams, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is DC1EM Research Paper No. 73-RP-981.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, M.M., Lederman, S.J. Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction. Perception & Psychophysics 17, 23–36 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203993
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203993