Abstract
Cutaneous receptors sensitive to high-frequency vibration produce spatial summation at threshold levels of stimulation, whereas the response of the receptor population sensitive to low frequencies appears to be independent of contactor size at threshold. Reports have been made of a phenomenon in which the presumably nonsummating population of mechanoreceptors produce spatial summation at suprathreshold levels. A possible explanation concerns the relative signal-to-noise ratios of cutaneous mechanoreceptor systems. By selectively masking the systems with narrow-band and wide-band noise, it can be shown that any combination of signal frequency, masking noise, and contactor size that predominantly activates either system results in a linear effect of the masker on the threshold of the signal. Combinations of the experimental variables that activate both receptor systems simultaneously reduce the effect of the masking by one-half. This is interpreted as evidence of an interactive process between receptor systems within the central nervous system. The effects of signal-to-noise ratio and intrasensory interactions are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gray, J. A. B., &Sato, M. Movement of sodium and other ions in Pacinian corpuscles.Journal of Physiology (London), 1955,129, 594–607.
Green, B., &Craig, J. C. The roles of vibration amplitude and static force in vibrotactile spatial summation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 503–507.
Harrington, T., &Merzenich, M. M. Neural coding in the sense of touch: Human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechano-receptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys.Experimental Brain Research, 1970,10, 251–264.
Johnson, K. O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innvervating glabrous skin of the monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1974,37, 48–72.
Loewenstein, W. R., &Mendelson, M. Components of receptor adaptation in a Pacinian corpuscle.Journal of Physiology (London). 1965,41, 377–397.
Merzenich, M. M.. &Harrington, T. The sense of flutter-vibration evoked by the stimulation of the hairy skin of primates: Comparison of human sensory capacity with the responses of mechanoreceptive afférents innvervating the hairy skin of monkeys.Experimental Brain Research, 1969,9, 236–260.
Sato, M. Response of Pacinian corpuscles to sinusoidal vibration.Journal of Physiology, 1961,159, 391–409.
Talbot, W. H., Dariajm-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H. H., &Mountcastle, V. B. The sense of flutter vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1968,31, 301–334.
Verrillo, R. T. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963,35, 1962–1966.
Verrillo, R. T. Effect of spatial parameters on the vibrotactile threshold.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,71, 570–575. (a)
Verrillo, R. T. Vibrotactile sensitivity and the frequency response of the Pacinian corpuscle.Psychonomic Science, 1966,4, 135–136. (b)
Verrillo, R. T. Specificity of a cutaneous receptor.Perception & Psychophysics. 1966,1, 149–153. (c)
Verrillo, R. T. A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception. In D. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1968.
Verrillo, R. T. Vibrotactile intensity scaling at several body sites. In F. A. Geldard (Ed.),Cutaneous communication systems and devices. Austin, Tex: Psychonomic Society, 1974.
Verrillo, R. T., Fraioli, A. J., &Smith, R. L. Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 366–372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NS-09940 from the National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verrillo, R.T., Capraro, A.J. Effect of extrinsic noise on vibrotactile information processing channels. Perception & Psychophysics 18, 88–94 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204092
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204092