Abstract
The interaction between size and orientation feature processing in the human visual system was investigated. Both observer sensitivity (d’ss) and the visual evoked potential (VEP) to test gratings flashed to one eye were investigated as a function of the nature of a continuously presented suppressing grating viewed either by that same eye or the opposite eye. The test and suppressing gratings were varied both in bar width (9′ss vs. 36′ss) and orientation (vertical vs. horizontal). The continuous grating intra- and interocularly suppressed the monocular VEPs to the flashed grating, the specificity of the suppression depending on the latency at which VEP amplitude was measured. VEP amplitude measured at early latencies (100–125 msec) was suppressed primarily when the flashed and continuous gratings were the same orientation, regardless of size. Starting at about 200 msec, and thereafter, VEP amplitudes were suppressed when the continuous bars were either the same orientationor size as the flashed bars. Late latencies, starting at 220 msec, and thereafter, were suppressed primarily when the bars in the two gratings were the same orientation and size. The reduction in observer sensitivity (d′ss) paralleled the changes found in the late VEP measures. These effects were evident under both the intraocular and interocular suppressing conditions. This pattern of VEP suppression, measured across eight points in the VEP waveform, was interpreted as indicating the existence of a sequence of channels that are specific first to a particular grating orientation, then to either a particular grating spatial frequency or orientation, and finally to the conjunction of a particular orientation and spatial frequency. Both sequential and parallel feature processing appears to take place in the human visual cortex, with grating orientation being encoded earlier than grating size.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abadi, R. V. Induction masking—a study of some inhibitory interactions during dichoptic viewing.Vision Research, 1976,16, 269–275.
Bishop, G. H., &Clark, M. H. Sequence of events in optic cortex response to volleys of impulses in the radiation.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1953,16, 490–498.
Blakemore, C, &Campbell, F. W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.Journal of Physiology, 1969,203, 237–260.
Blakemore, C. Nachmias, J., &Sutton, P. The perceived spatial frequency shift: Evidence for frequency selective neurones in the human brain.Journal of Physiology, 1970,210, 727–750.
Blakemore, C. &Sutton, P. Size adaptation: A new after-effect.Science, 1969,171, 245–247.
Breitmeyer, B. G., &Ganz, L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 1–36.
Campbell, F. W., &Kulikowski, J. J. Orientational selectivity of a human visual system.Journal of Physiology, 1966,187, 437–445.
Campbell.F. W.. &Maffei, L. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system.Journal of Physiology, 1970,207, 635–652.
Campbell, F. W., &Maffei, L. The tilt after-effect: A fresh look.Vision Research, 1971,11, 833–840.
Campbell, F. W., &Robson, J. G. Applications of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.Journal of Physiology, 1968,197, 551–566.
Dixon, W. J. (Ed.).Biomedical computer programs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.
Donchin, E., &Heffley, E. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In D. Otto (Ed.),Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.
Donchin, E., Ritter.W., &McCallum, W. C. Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, & S. H. Koslow (Eds.),Event-related brain potentials in man. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Georgeson, M. A. Spatial frequency selectivity of a visual tilt illusion.Nature, 1973,245, 43–45.
Gilinsky, A. S., &Doherty, R. S. Interocular transfer of orientational effects.Science, 1969,164, 454–455.
Gilinsky, A. S., &Mayo, T. H. Inhibitory effects of orientational adaptation.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971,61, 1710–1714.
Green, D., &Swets, J.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Harter, M. R., Conder, E. S., & Towle, V. L. Orientation-specific and luminance effects: Interocular suppression of visual evoked potentials.Psychophysiology, in press.
Harter, M. R., &Previc, F. H. Size-specific information channels and selective attention: Visual evoked potential and behavioral measures.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978,45, 628–640.
Harter, M. R., Previc, F. H., &Towle, V. L. Evoked potential indicants of size- and orientation-specific information processing: Feature-specific sensory channels and attention. In D. Lehmann & E. Callaway (Eds.),Human evoked potentials: Applications and problems. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.
Harter, M. R., &Salmon, L. E. Intra-modality selective attention and evoked cortical potentials to randomly presented patterns.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972,32, 605–613.
Harter, M. R., Towle, V. L., &Musso, M. F. Size specificity and interocular suppression: Monocular evoked potentials and reaction times.Vision Research, 1976,16, 1111–1117.
Harter, M. R., Towle, V. L., Zakrzewski, M., &Moyer, S. M. An objective indicant of binocular vision in humans: Size-specific interocular suppression of visual evoked potentials.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1977,43, 825–836.
Harter, M. R., &White, C. T. Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: Effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1970,28, 48–54.
Jeffreys, D. A., &Axford, J. G. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin.Experimental Brain Research, 1972,16, 1–21. (a)
Jeffreys, D. A., &Axford, J. G. Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin.Experimental Brain Research, 1972,16, 22–40. (b)
Maffei, L., &Fiorentini, A. Processes of synthesis in visual perception.Nature, 1972,240, 479–481.
Maffei, L., &Fiorentini, A. Spatial frequency rows in the striate cortex.Vision Research, 1977,17, 257–264.
Mecacci, L., &Spinelli, D. The effects of spatial frequency adaptation on human evoked potentials.Vision Research, 1976,16, 477–479.
Musso, M. F., &Harter, M. R. Visually evoked potentials and selective masking with patterned flashes of different spatial frequencies.Vision Research, 1975,15, 231–238.
Noda, H., Tamaki, Y., &Iwama, K. Binocular units in the lateral geniculate nucleus of chronic cats.Brain Research, 1972,41, 81–99.
Pantle, A., &Sekuler, R. Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision.Science, 1968,162, 1146–1148.
Parker, D. M. Contrast and size variables and the tilt after-effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,24, 1–7.
Reitveld, W. J., Tordior, W. E. M., Hagenouw, J. R. B., Lubbers, J. A., &Spoor, A. C. Visual evoked responses to blank and to checkerboard patterned flashes.Acta Physiologica et Pharmachologica Neerlandica, 1967,14, 259–285.
Ritter, W., Simson, R., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972,33, 547–555.
Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L., &Volman, S. F. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976,39, 1320–1333. (a)
Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B., &Volman, S. F. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequency.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976,39, 1334–1351. (b)
Schwent, V. L., Hillyard, S. L., &Galambos, R. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. I. Effects of stimulus delivery rate.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976,40, 604–614.
Smith, A. T., &Jeffreys, D. A. Size and orientation specificity of transient visual evoked potentials in man.Vision Research, 1978,18, 651–655.
Squires, N. K., Donchin, E., Squires, K. C., &Grossberg, S. Bisensory stimulation: Inferring decision-related processes from the P300 component.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1977,3, 299–315.
Towle, V. L., &Harter, M. R. Objective determination of human visual acuity: Pattern evoked potentials.Investigative Ophthalmology, 1977,16, 1073–1076.
Ware, C., &Mitchell, D. E. The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect.Vision Research, 1974,14, 735–737.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Wyatt, H. J. Singly and doubly contingent after-effects involving color, orientation and spatial frequency.Vision Research, 1974,14, 1185–1193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This experiment was the PhD dissertation project of the first author while at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. It was supported in part by a Sloan Foundation grant. Reprints may be obtained from the second author. Portions of these data were presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, Florida, 1978, and were published in the proceedings of the NATO Conference on Human Evoked Potentials, Konstanz, West Germany, 1978 (see Harter, Previc, & Towle, 1979).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Towle, V.L., Harter, M.R. & Previc, F.H. Binocular interaction of orientation and spatial frequency channels: Evoked potentials and observer sensitivity. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 351–360 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206124
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206124