Abstract
Two studies addressed people’s knowledge about the movements underlying functional interactions with objects, when the interactions were described by simple verbal labels expressing environmental goals. In Experiment 1, subjects rated each action with respect to six dimensions: which portion of the limb moved, distance moved, forcefulness, effectors involved, size of the contact surface, and resemblance to grasp. Ratings were systematic and fell on two distinct underlying factors related to limb movement and effector (usually the hand) configuration. In Experiment 2, subjects sorted a subset of the actions by similarity of movement. Clustering and multidimensional scaling solutions indicated that the six initial dimensions contributed to similarity judgments, along with additional parameters. The results support the existence of cognitively accessible, but still relatively specific, representations of functional actions, with potential implications for motor and memory performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brouchon, M., Joanette, Y., &Samson, M. (1986). From movement to gesture: “Here” and “there” as determinants of visually guided pointing. In J. L. Nespoulous, J. Perron, & A. R. Lecours (Eds.),Biological foundations of gestures: Motor and semiological aspects (pp. 95–107). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cutkosky, M. R., &Howe, R. D. (1990). Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In S. T. Venkataraman & T. Iberall (Eds.),Dextrous robot hands (pp. 5–32). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ekman, P., &Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behaviour: Categories, origins, usage, and coding.Semiotica,1, 49–98.
Engelkamp, J., &Cohen, R. L. (1991). Current issues in memory of action events.Psychological Research,53, 175–182.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit.Psychological Research,46, 283–299.
Feltz, D. L., &Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Sport Psychology,5, 25–57.
Gandevia, S. C., &Rothwell, J. C. (1987). Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons.Brain,110, 1117–1130.
Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., &Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.Nature,349, 154–156.
Helstrup, T. (1989). Loci for act recall: Contextual influence on the processing of action events.Psychological Research,51, 168–175.
Iberall, T., Bingham, G., &Arbib, M.A. (1986). Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.),Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 158–173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements.Journal of Motor Behavior,16, 235–254.
Jeannerod, M. (1986). The formation of finger grip during prehension: A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern.Behavioral Brain Research,19, 99–116.
Keele, S. W. (1986). Motor control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 30-1–30-60). New York: Wiley.
Klatzky, R. L., McCloskey, B., Doherty, S., Pellegrino, J., &Smith, T. (1987). Knowledge about hand movements and knowledge about objects.Journal of Motor Behavior,19, 187–213.
Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J., McCloskey, B., &Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 56–77.
Kroemer, K. H. E. (1986). Coupling the hand with the handle: An improved notation of touch, grip and grasp.Human Factors,28, 337–340.
Macneilage, P. F. (1990). Grasping in modern primates: The evolutionary context. In M. A. Goodale (Ed.),Vision and action: The control of grasping (pp. 1–13). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Malek, R. (1981). The grip and its modalities. In R. Tubiana (Ed.),The hand (Vol. 1, pp. 469–480). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Marcel, A. M. (1992). The personal level in cognitive rehabilitation. In N. von Steinbüchel, D. Y. von Cramon, & E. Pöppel (Eds.),Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 155–168). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
McCloskey, B. P., Klatzky, R. L., &Pellegrino, J. (1992). On rubbing your stomach while tapping your fingers: Evidence for interference between motor planning and semantic judgments about actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 948–961.
McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review,92, 350–371.
Miller, G. A. (1972). English verbs of motion: A case study in semantics and lexical memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 335–372). Washington, DC: Winston.
Napier, J. R. (1956). The prehensile movements of the human hand.Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery,38B, 902–912.
Nilsson, L. G., &Backman, L. (1991). Encoding dimensions of subject-performed tasks.Psychological Research,53, 212–218.
Richardson, A. (1967). Mental practice: A review and discussion, ResearchQuarterly,38, 95–107, 263-273.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Slotta, J. D., Vaughan, J., &Plamondon, R. (1991). Optimal movement selection.Psychological Science,2, 86–91.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor learning.Psychological Review,82, 225–260.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Trevarthen, C. (1984). How control of movements develops. In H. T. A. Whiting (Ed.),Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed (pp. 223–261). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
von Hofsten, C. (1984). Developmental changes in the organization of prereaching movements.Developmental Psychology,20, 378–388.
Wiener, M., Devoe, S., Rubinow, S., &Geller, J. (1972). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication.Psychological Review,79, 189–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper profited considerably from interactions with participants at an ISAS (International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste, Italy) conference on mentally represented actions, directed by Mark Jeannerod.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klatzky, R.L., Pellegrino, J., McCloskey, B.P. et al. Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Mem Cogn 21, 294–303 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208262
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208262