Abstract
This study incorporates findings on both the sleeper effect and the suggestibility of memory and assesses the effect of source credibility and time delay on memory suggestibility. Subjects viewed a sequence of slides with four target items. A narrative followed, containing a misleading description of two target items; the other two items served as controls. The source of the narrative was attributed to either a 4-year-old boy (low-credibility source) or a memory psychologist (high-credibility source) who described the slides. A recognition memory test followed 10 min or 1 month later. The subjects in the low-credibility source condition falsely recognized significantly more misleading items in the delayed condition than in the immediate condition; in the high-credibility condition, the number of falsely recognized misleading items was high and did not differ between the delayed and the immediate conditions. This significant interaction between source credibility, time, and misled/control conditions on the rate of falsely recognizing misled items suggests that, with the passage of time, item and source information become less strongly associated in memory. The cognitive processes underlying the sleeper effect appear to be similar to those underlying memory suggestibility.
Article PDF
References
Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., &McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals.Memory & Cognition,22, 40–54.
Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (Eds.) (1996).International perspectives on child abuse and child testimony. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ceci, S. J., &Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin,113, 403–439.
Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., &Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children’s memory: Psycholegal implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 38–49.
Dodd, D. H., &Bradshaw, J. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 695–704.
Gillig, P. M., &Greenwald, A. G. (1974). Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,29, 132–139.
Hannah, D. B., &Sternthal, B. (1984). Detecting and explaining the sleeper effect.Journal of Consumer Research,11, 632–642.
Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., &Sheffield, F. D. (1949).Experiments in mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hovland, C. I., &Weiss, W. (1952). Source credibility and effective communication.Public Opinion Quarterly,16, 635–650.
Hyman, I. E., Jr.,Husband, T. H., &Billings, F. J. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences.Applied Cognitive Psychology,9, 181–197.
Johnson, M. K. (in press). Source monitoring and memory distortions. In L. Squire & D. Schacter (Eds.),Biological and psychological perspectives on memory and memory disorders. New York: American Psychiatric Press.
Lampinen, J. M., &Smith, V. L. (1995). The incredible (and sometimes incredulous) child witness: Child witnesses’ sensitivity to source credibility cues.Journal of Applied Psychology,80, 621–627.
Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Eyewitness suggestibility. Current Directions inPsychological Science,2, 86–89.
Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memory.American Psychologist,48, 518–537.
Loftus, E. F., &Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 585–589.
Loftus, E. F., &Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories.Psychiatric Annals,25, 720–725.
Mazursky, D., &Schul, Y. (1987). The effects of advertisement encoding on the failure to discount information: Implications for the sleeper effect.Journal of Consumer Research,15, 24–35.
Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross-modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,3, 515–524.
Pezdek, K., Finger, K., &Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility.Psychological Science,8, 437–441.
Pezdek, K., &Greene, J. (1993). Testing eyewitness memory: Developing a measure that is more resistant to suggestibility.Law & Human Behavior,17, 361–369.
Pezdek, K., &Roe, C. (1994). Memory for childhood events: How suggestible is it?Consciousness & Cognition,3, 374–387.
Pezdek, K., &Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,60, 116–128.
Smith, V. L., &Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness testimony: Misleading questions and communicator expertise.Journal of Applied Psychology,72, 294–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted as J.U.’s masters thesis, under the supervision of K.P. J.U. thanks Mette Kurth for her patience and support throughout this project and for her talented editing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Underwood, J., Pezdek, K. Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5, 449–453 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208820
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208820