Abstract
The present paper introduces theP system as a scheme for organizing Pavlovian procedures in an orderly and comprehensive manner. The system is defined by three temporal variables and three restrictions on their possible values. It can be used to define all standard temporal variables—namely, stimulus duration, interstimulus interval, trace interval, and intertrial interval—as well as variables C and T of scalar expectancy theory. The system also permits the definition of new independent variables through combinations of the basic temporal parameters. We exemplify this possibility by defining two ratios of temporal intervals. These ratios lead to a space where traditional Pavlovian arrangements (viz., simultaneous, forward-trace, forward-delay, backward) become points on a continuum, and optimal conditions across different experimental preparations become equivalent. Finally, the system can be used to define contingency variables such asp(US/CS),p(US/∼CS), and the phi coefficient (φ). In this manner, an organization of different kinds of Pavlovian procedures is achieved on the basis of a single parametric scheme. Such an organization facilitates establishing procedural and theoretical relationships between temporal and contingency variables. The paper concludes with a discussion of certain limitations of the system and other related issues
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annau, Z., &Kamin, L. J. (1961). The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,54, 428–432.
Balsam, P. D. (1984a). Bringing the background to the foreground: The role of contextual cues in autoshaping. In M. Commons, R. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 3. Acquisition (pp. 145–171). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Balsam, P. D. (1984b). Relative time in trace conditioning. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 211–227). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Balsam, P. D., &Payne, D. (1979). Intertrial interval and unconditioned stimulus durations in autoshaping.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 477–482.
Barnet, R. C., Grahame, N. J., &Miller, R. R. (1991). Simultaneous conditioning demonstrated in second order conditioning: Evidence for similar associative structure in forward and simultaneous conditioning.Learning & Motivation,22, 253–268.
Barnet, R. C., Grahame, N. J., &Miller, R. R. (1993). Temporal encoding as a determinant of blocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 327–341.
Brown, P. L., &Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Autoshaping of the pigeon’s keypeck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 1–8.
Burkhardt, P. E., &Ayres, J. J. B. (1978). CS and US duration effects in one-trial simultaneous fear conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 225–230.
Cooper, L. D. (1991). Temporal factors in classical conditioning.Learning & Motivation,22, 129–152.
Damianopoulos, E. N. (1982). Necessary and sufficient factors in classical conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,17, 215–229.
Damianopoulos, E. N. (1987). Conditioning, attention, and the CS-US interval: A theoretical statement of relations.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,22, 16–30.
Estes, W. K., &Skinner, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety.Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 390–400.
Frey, P. W., &Butler, C. S. (1973). Rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus duration.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 289–294.
Frey, P. W., &Ross, L. E. (1968). Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response as a function of interstimulus interval.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,65, 246–250.
Gamzu, E., &Williams, D. R. (1971). Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.Science,171, 923–925.
Gamzu, E., &Williams, D. R. (1973). Associative factors underlying the pigeon’s keypecking in autoshaping procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,19, 225–232.
Garcia, J., &Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science,4, 123–124.
Gibbon, J., Baldock, M. D., Locurto, C., Gold, L., &Terrace, H. S. (1977). Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 264–284.
Gibbon, J., &Balsam, P. D. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. G. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–253). New York: Academic Press.
Gibbon, J., Berryman, R., &Thompson, R. L. (1974). Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 585–605.
Gormezano, I. (1972). Investigations of defense and reward conditioning in the rabbit. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 151–181). New York: Academic Press.
Gormezano, I., &Kehoe, E. J. (1975). Classical conditioning: Some methodological-conceptual issues. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 143–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gormezano, I., &Kehoe, E. J. (1981). Classical conditioning and the law of contiguity. In P. Harzem & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 1–45). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Gormezano, I., Schneiderman, N., Deaux, E. B., &Fuentes, I. (1962). Nictitating membrane: Classical conditioning and extinction in the albino rabbit.Science,138, 33–34.
Grau, J. W., &Rescorla, R. A. (1984). Role of context in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 324–332.
Jenkins, H. M. (1984). Time and contingency in classical conditioning. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 242–253). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Jenkins, H. M., &Lambos, W. A. (1983). Tests of two explanations of response elimination by noncontingent reinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 302–308.
Jenkins, H. M., &Moore, B. R. (1973). The form of the autoshaped response with food or water reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,20, 163–181.
Kamin, L. J. (1965). Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical conditioning: A symposium (pp. 118–147). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kaplan, P. S. (1985). Explaining the effects of relative time in trace conditioning: A preliminary test of a comparator hypothesis.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 233–238.
Libby, A. (1951). Two variables in the acquisition of depressant properties by a stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology,42, 100–107.
Lindblom, L. L., &Jenkins, H. M. (1981). Responses eliminated by non-contingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 175–190.
Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P., &Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and the expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory.Learning & Motivation,19, 317–344.
Miller, R. R., &Grahame, N. J. (1991). Expression of learning. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.),Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 95–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Papini, M. R., &Bitterman, M. E. (1990). The role of contingency in classical conditioning.Psychological Review,97, 396–403.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Prokasy, W. F. (1965). Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical conditioning: A symposium (pp. 208–225). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Randich, A., &Rescorla, R. A. (1981). The effects of separate presentations of the US on conditioned suppression.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 56–64.
Rescorla, R. A. (1966). Predictability and number of pairings in Pavlovian fear conditioning.Psychonomic Science,4, 383–384.
Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review,74, 71–80.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,66, 1–5.
Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,67, 504–509.
Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Informational variables in Pavlovian conditioning. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.
Rescorla, R. A., &LoLordo, V. M. (1965). Inhibition of avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,59, 406–412.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Revusky, S. (1968). Aversion to sucrose produced by contingent X-irradiation: Temporal and dosage parameters.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,65, 17–22.
Riess, D., &Farrar, C. H. (1973). UCS duration and conditioned suppression: Acquisition and extinction between-groups and terminal performance within-subjects.Learning & Motivation,4, 366–373.
Runquist, W. N., &Spence, K. W. (1959). Performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of UCS duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,57, 249–252.
Schoenfeld, W. N., &Cole, B. (1972).Stimulus schedules: The t-τ systems. New York: Harper & Row.
Sherman, J. E. (1978). US inflation with trace and simultaneous fear conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 463–468.
Smith, M. C., Coleman, S. R., &Gormezano, I. (1969). Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,69, 226–231.
Tait, R. W., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1983). Effects of US duration on classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 91–101.
Yeo, A. G. (1974). The acquisition of conditioned suppression as a function of interstimulus interval duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,26, 405–416.
Zeaman, D., &Wegner, N. (1958). Strength of cardiac conditioned responses with varying stimulus duration.Psychological Review,65, 238–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Preliminary versions of this paper were presented in the 17th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, May 1991, and the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, April 1992. The authors thank J.W. Donahoe, J. J. B. Ayres, and F. Grasso for useful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burgos, J.E., Bevins, R.A. TheP system: A scheme for organizing Pavlovian procedures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 29, 473–483 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210599
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210599