Abstract
In two experiments, we explored how readers encode information that is linguistically focused. Subjects read sentences in which a word or phrase was focused by a syntactic manipulation (Experiment 1) or by a preceding context (Experiment 2) while their eye movements were monitored. Readers had longer reading times while reading a region of the sentence that was focused than when the same region was not focused. The results suggest that readers encode focused information more carefully, either upon first encountering it or during a second-pass reading of it. We conclude that the enhanced memory representations for focused information found in previous studies may be due in part to differences in reading patterns for focused information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 289–296.
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration.Science,153, 25–33.
Birch, S. L., &Garnsey, S. M. (1995). The effect of focus on memory for words in sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 232–267.
Blutner, R., &Sommer, R. (1988). Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task.Journal of Memory & Language,7, 359–367.
Bock, J. K., &Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension.Memory & Cognition,11, 64–76.
Bredart, S., &Docquier, M. (1989). The Moses illusion: A followup on the focalization effect.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology,9, 357–362.
Bredart, S., &Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion.Acta Psychologica,67, 135–144.
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1977a). Integrative processes in comprehension. In P. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 217–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1977b). Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.),Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology (pp. 183–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., &Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the Given-New contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.),Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Conrad, F. G., &Rips, L. J. (1986). Conceptual combination and the Given/New distinction.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 255–278.
Cutler, A. (1976). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 55–60.
Cutler, A., &Fodor, J. A. (1979). Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.Cognition,7, 49–59.
Ehrlich, K., &Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 75–87.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1982). The interaction of subjectivization and concept placement in the processing of cleft sentences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34A, 463–478.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming times: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 465–495.
Garrod, S., Freudenthal, D., &Boyle, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 39–68.
Gernsbacher, M. A., &Jescheniak, J. (1995). Cataphoric devices in spoken discourse.Cognitive Psychology,29, 24–58.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2.Journal of Linguistics,3, 199–244.
Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 530–538.
Langford, J., &Holmes, V. M. (1979). Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension.Cognition,7, 363–383.
Lehiste, I. (1970).Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mackworth, N. N., &Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 547–552.
Rayner, K., &Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.
Rayner, K., Garrod, S., &Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.Cognition,45, 109–139.
Rochemont, M. S., &Culicover, P. W. (1990).English focus constructions and the theory of grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1987). Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 322–340.
Scinto, L. F. (1978). Relation of eye fixations to Old-New information in texts. In J. W. Senders, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (pp. 175–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sedivy, J. C., Carlson, G. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. K., & Eberhard, K. (1995).The cognitive function of contrast sets in processing focus constructions. Unpublished manuscript.
Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., &Martin, J. G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 250–255.
Singer, M. (1976). Thematic structure and the integration of linguistic information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 549–558.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. K., Eberhard, K., &Sedivy, J. (1996). Using eye movements to study spoken language comprehension: Evidence for visually-mediated incremental interpretation. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.),Attention and performance XVI: Interaction in perception and communication (pp. 457–478). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1981). The given-new structure of cleft sentences and their influence on picture viewing.Psychological Research,43, 375–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birch, S., Rayner, K. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition 25, 653–660 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211306
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211306