Abstract
In order to separate the effects of experience from other characteristics of word frequency (e.g., orthographic distinctiveness), computer science and psychology students rated their experience with computer science technical items and nontechnical items from a wide range of word frequencies prior to being tested for recognition memory of the rated items. For nontechnical items, there was a curvilinear relationship between recognition accuracy and word frequency for both groups of students. The usual superiority of low-frequency words was demonstrated and high-frequency words were recognized least well. For technical items, a similar curvilinear relationship was evident for the psychology students, but for the computer science students, recognition accuracy was inversely related to word frequency. The ratings data showed that subjective experience rather than background word frequency was the better predictor of recognition accuracy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, L. R., &Garton, R. F. (1968). The influence of knowledge on the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Psychonomic Science,10, 401–402.
Decker, R., &Hirshfield, S. (1992).Pascal’s triangle. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 23–29.
Gregg, F. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. B. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 183–216). London: Wiley.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Leestma, S., &Nyhoff, L. (1990).Turbo Pascal: Programming and problem solving. New York: Macmillan.
Schulman, A. I. (1976). Memory for rare words previously rated for familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 301–307.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Sobell, M. G. (1989).A practical guide to the Unix system (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Zechmeister, E. B., Curt, C., &Sebastian, J. A. (1978). Errors in a recognition memory task are a U-shaped function of word frequency.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 371–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was part of K.A.C.’s PhD research. It was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award to K.A.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chalmers, K.A., Humphreys, M.S. & Dennis, S. A naturalistic study of the word frequency effect in episodic recognition. Memory & Cognition 25, 780–784 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211321
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211321