Abstract
Recent research (Kuhl, 1991) has suggested that the internal structure of vowel categories is graded in terms of stimulus goodness. It has been proposed that abest instance stimulus reflects a central point or prototype, which effectively renders within-category members perceptually more similar. Discrimination experiments suggest a nonlinear relationship between acoustic and perceptual space near category centers (Iverson & Kuhl, 1995b). This phenomenon has been described as theperceptual magnet effect. The present study investigated the presence of the perceptual magnet effect in five Australian vowel categories. Australian English speakers identified, rated, and discriminated between a pool of 32 vowel stimuli that varied inFl andF2 values. The results from Experiments 1 and 2 showed that subjects were able to judge the quality and identity of each stimulus and that a general grading of stimulus quality was reported. This was not symmetrical, and the subjects’ responses varied considerably. In Experiment 3, closer control of the methodology in the discrimination task and of contextual factors influencing the test materials was exercised. Despite this, evidence of the warping of perceptual space in discrimination data was not found. In general, these results do not provide support for the existence of the perceptual magnet effect, and explanations for this finding are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard, J. R. (1967). Length and the identification of Australian English vowels.Journal of the Australasian Universities Language & Literature Association,27, 37–58.
Bernard, J. R. (1989). Quantitative aspects of the sounds of Australian English. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.),Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 187–204). St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University Press.
Clark, J. E. (1989). Some proposals for a revised phonetic transcription of Australian English. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.), Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 205–213). St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University Press.
Collins, P., &Blair, D. (1989).Australian English: The language of a new society. St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University Press.
Eimas, P., &Corbit, J. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology,4, 99–109.
Fant, G. (1973).Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Flanagan, J. L. (1957). Estimates of the maximum precision necessary in quantizing certain dimensions of vowel sounds.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,29, 533–534.
Flege, J. E., Schmidt, A. M., &Wharton, G. (1996). Age of learning affects rate-dependent processing of stops in a second language.Phonetica,53, 143–161.
Fujisaki, H., &.Kawashima, T. (1969). On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception.Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute (University of Tokyo, Faculty of Engineering),28, 67–73.
Grieser, D., &Kuhl, P. K. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes.Developmental Psychology,25, 577–588.
Horvath, B. M. (1985).Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iverson, P., &Kuhl, P. K. (1995a). Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners’ perception of |r| and |l|.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,99, 1130–1140.
Iverson, P., &Kuhl, P. K. (1995b). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 553–562.
Johnson, K., Flemming, E., &Wright, R. (1993). The hyper-space effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated.Language,69, 505–528.
Jones, A. I. (1968).Phonetics: A phonological introduction. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Kewley-Port, D., &Atal, S. B. (1989). Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 1726–1740.
Klatt, D. H. (1980).Speech perception: A model of acoustic phonetic analysis and lexical access. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a“perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 93–107.
Kuhl, P. K. (1992). Psychoacoustics and speech perception: Internal standards, perceptual anchors, and prototypes. In L. A. Werner & E. W. Rubel (Eds.),Developmental psychoacoustics (pp. 293–332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: Implications for theories of developmental speech perception.Journal of Phonetics,21, 125–139.
Kuhl, P. K. (1994). Learning and representation in speech and language.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,4, 812–822.
Kuhl, P. K., &Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100, 2425–2438.
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., &Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.Science,255, 606–608.
Lively, S. E., &Pisoni, D. B. (1997). On prototypes and phonetic categories: A critical magnet effect in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1665–1679.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Massaro, D., &Cohen, M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology,23, 558–614.
Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 333–352.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification theory.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Miller, J. L. (1977). Properties of feature detectors for VOT: The voiceless channel of analysis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 641–648.
Miller, J. L. (1994). On the internal structure of phonetic categories: A progress report.Cognition,50, 271–285.
Miller, J. L., Connine, C M., Schermer, T. M., &Kluender, K. R. (1983). A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 2124–2132.
Miller, J. L., &Eimas, P. D. (1996). Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1157–1167.
Miller, J. L., &Volaitis, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 505–512.
Mitchell, A. G., &Delbridge, A. (1965).The speech of Australian adolescents. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in identification and categorization of integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 87–108.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification.Cognitive Psychology,23, 94–140.
Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 253–260.
Pisoni, D. B., &Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 285–290.
Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes.Perception & Psychophysics,31,307–314.
Schouten, M. E. H., &van Hessen, A. J. (1992). Modeling phoneme perception: I. Categorical perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,92, 1841–1855.
Sussman, J. E., &Lauckner-Morano, V. J. (1995). Further tests of the“perceptual magnet effect” in the perception of [i]: Identification and change/no-change discrimination.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 539–552.
Volaitis, L. E., &Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,92, 723–735.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thyer, N., Hickson, L. & Dodd, B. The perceptual magnet effect in Australian English vowels. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1–20 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212057
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212057