Abstract
Changes in eye position were recorded while S experienced visually induced motion. Movement of the eye was not found to correlate, in either direction or extent, with this type of apparent motion. Induced movement was explained, therefore, in terms of a change in phenomenal rather than retinal location.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brusgnle, L.An analysis of induced motion. Port Washington: Naval Training Device Center,Tech. Rep. IH-48, February, 1966.
Brosgole, L. Induced autokinesis.Percept. & Psychophys., 1967, 2, 69–73.
Duncker, K. Über induzierte Bewegung (Ein Beitrag zur Theorie Optisch Wahrgenommener).Psychol. Forsch., 1929, 12, 180–259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Brosgole, L., Cristal, R.M. & Carpenter, O. The role of eye movements in the perception of visually induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics 3, 166–168 (1968). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212722
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212722