Abstract
In a paradigm that avoids methodological problems of earlier studies, evidence was gathered addressed to the question of whether we read letter by letter. If word recognition involves letter recognition, then the difficulty of recognizing a word should vary with the difficulty of recognizing its letters. This was tested by assessing letter difficulty in two letter discrimination tasks and in a letter naming task, and then comparing 15 adult subjects’ visual recognition latency to 72 easy-letter words and to 72 difficult-letter words. Word frequency and word length were also manipulated. Results indicated no effect for letter difficulty, although recognition latency reliably decreased with word frequency and monotonically increased with word length (21 msec/letter), suggesting that we do not read letter by letter, but that whatever plays a role in word recognition is smaller than the word and correlated with word length in letters.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Derks. P. L.Complexity, smilarity, and letter recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomlc Society, St. Louis, 1971.
Stewart. M. L., James. C. T., & Gough, P. B.Word recognition latency as a.function of word length. Paper presented at the Midestern Psychological Association Convention. Chicago. 1969.
Cosky. M. J., & Swinney, D. A.Is reading accomplished phoneme-by-phoneme? Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May 1975.
References
Brand, J. Classification without identification in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971,23, 171–186.
Brewer, W. F. Is reading a letter-by-letter process? In J. F. Kavanaugh & L G. Mattingly (Eds.).Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass: M.LT Press, 1972. pp. 359–365.
Cattell, J. McK. Ueber die Zeit der Erkennung und Bennennung von Schrittzeichen, Bildern und Farben.Philosophische Studien, 1885,2, 635–650. (Translated as: On the time required for recognizing and naming letters and words. pictures and colors.) In A. T. Poffenberger (Ed.),James McKeen Cattell Man of science (Vol. 1)Psychological research. Lancaster. Pa: Science Press. 1947. Pp. 13–23.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Leamtng and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Draper, N. R., &Smith, H.Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley. 1966.
Erdmann, B.,&Dodge, R.Psychologtsche Untersuchungen uber das Lesen auf experimenteller Grundlage. Halle: Neimeyer. 1898.
Eriksen, C., Pollack, M., &Montague, W. Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1970,84, 502–507.
Forster, K., &Chambers, S. M. Lexical access and nammg time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 627–635.
Gibson, E. J. The ontogeny of reading.American Psychologist. 1970,25, 136–143.
Goldscheider, A., &Muller, R. F. Zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Lesens.Zeuschrift fur Klinische Medizin, 1893,23, 131–167.
Gough, P. B. One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanaugh & L G. Mattingly (Eds.).Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge. Mass’ M LT. Press. 1972. Pp 331–358.
Henderson, L., Coltheart, M., &Woodhouse, D. Failure to tind a syllabic effect in number-naming.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 304–306.
Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1951,41, 401–410.
Johnston, J. C. &McClelland, J. L. Visual factors in word perception.Perception & Psychophysics. 1973,14, 365–370.
Kendall, M. G.Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin. 1948.
Klapp, S. Implicit speech inferred from response latencies In same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971. 91. 262–267.
Klapp, S. Syllable-dependent pronunciation latencies in number naming: A replication.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1974,102, 1138–1140.
Klapp, S., Anderson, W., &Berrian, R. Implicit speech in reading. reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1973,100, 368–374.
Kolers, P. A., &Katzman, M. T. Naming sequentially presented letters and words.Language and Speech. 1966,9, 84–95.
Korte, W. Über die Gestaltauffassung im indirekten Sehen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1923,93, 17–82.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press. 1967.
Massaro, D. W. Perception of letters, words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 349–353.
Matthews, M. L., &Henderson, L. Facilitation of foveal letter recognition by metacontrast.Psychonomic Science, 1971,23, 153–154.
Mezrich, J. J. The word superiority effect in brief visual displays: Elimination by vocalization.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 45–48.
Pillsbury, W. B. The reading of words: A study in apperception.American Journal of Psychology, 1897,8, 315–393.
Posner, M. I. On the relationship between letter names and superordinate categories.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1970,22, 279–287,
Reicher, G. M, Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Expenmental Psychology, 1969,81, 275–280.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M, Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 197110, 57–62.
Smith, E. E., &Haviland, S. E, Why words are perceived more accurately than non-words: Inference versus unitization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,92, 59–64.
Smith, F. The use of featural dependencies across letters in the visual identification of words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 215–218.
Smith, F,Understanding reading. New York.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 71–89.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30.000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. 1944.
Thompson, M. C., &Massaro, D. W. Visual information and redundancy in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,98, 49–54.
Wheeler, D. D. Processes In word recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 59–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study is partly based on results reported in a master’s thesis completed at the University of Texas at Austin;
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cosky, M.J. The role of letter recognition in word recognition. Memory & Cognition 4, 207–214 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213165
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213165