Abstract
We examined the influence of semantic similarity and proactive interference (PI) on the word length effect (WLE) in immediate serial recall. Word length was manipulated by comparing memory for monosyllabic versus multisyllabic words. PI effects were evaluated by manipulating semantic similarity in the to-be-remembered lists and examining its impact on the WLE’s magnitude across eight-trial blocks. Words were sampled from a single semantic category across the entire block, from a single category within the list, or from different categories. Robust WLEs were observed in single-category blocks and when words were from different categories. However, when all the within-list words were from the same semantic category, the WLE was sharply attenuated. Except for the within-list semantic similarity condition, there was a buildup in PI levels in the form of protrusion errors across trials. However, the magnitude of the WLE did not increase with the PI buildup, suggesting that it was not affected by PI across trials.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80, 1–46.
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.
Cowan, N., Baddeley, A. D., Elliott, E. M., &Norris, J. (2003). List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: A comparison of localist and globalist assumptions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 74–79.
Goh, W. D., &Pisoni, D. B. (2003). Effects of lexical competition on immediate memory span for spoken words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 929–954.
Hendry, L., &Tehan, G. (2005). An item/order trade-off explanation of word length and generation effects.Memory,13, 364–371.
Hulme, C., Surprenant, A. M., Bireta, T. J., Stuart, G., &Neath, I. (2004). Abolishing the word-length effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 98–106.
La Pointe, L. B., &Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1118–1133.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.
Mueller, S. T., Seymour, T. L., Kieras, D. E., &Meyer, D. E. (2003). Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1353–1380.
Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.
Nairne, J. S., &Kelley, M. R. (2004). Separating item and order information through process dissociation.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 113–133.
Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.
Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., &Surprenant, A. M. (2003). The time-based word length effect and stimulus set specificity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 430–434.
Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.
Poirier, M., &Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 384–404.
Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., &Nimmo, L. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1019–1034.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1999). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there a detrimental effect on order information?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 367–394.
Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.
Tehan, G., &Humphreys, M. S. (1996). Cuing effects in short-term recall.Memory & Cognition,24, 719–732.
Tehan, G., &Turcotte, J. (2002). Word-length effects are not due to proactive interference.Memory,10, 139–149.
Tolan, G. A., &Tehan, G. (2005). Is spoken duration a sufficient explanation of the word length effect?Memory,13, 372–379.
Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning.Psychological Review,77, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Research Grants C-107-000-222-091 and R-581-000-048-112 to W.D.G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goh, W.D., Goh, C.K. The roles of semantic similarity and proactive interference in the word length effect. Psychon Bull Rev 13, 978–984 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213912
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213912