Abstract
Prior studies have indicated that thematic materials facilitate reasoning on the four-card selection problem, a task that assesses ability to evaluate logical conditionals of the “if-then” form. Recently, however, attempts to replicate the thematic effect have failed. The present study investigated four content materials to determine which facilitated reasoning. Introductory psychology students were required to determine which card(s) needed to be “unmasked” in order to determine the truth or falsity of conditional rules. Thematic materials did not facilitate reasoning compared with abstract materials. Evidence for both matching and verification bias was obtained, but neither was sufficient to account for all selection patterns. Subjects may thus be using “cognitive short-circuiting” strategies, of which matching bias and verification bias are but two examples.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R., Tweney, R. D., & Schiavo, M. D. Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica, 1979, 43, 111–121.
Evans, J. S. B. T. Toward a statistical theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977, 29, 621–634.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Lynch, L. S. Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 1973, 64, 391–397.
Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, in press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 1972, 63, 395–400.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 134–138.
Lunzer, E. A., Harrison, C., & Davey, M. The four-card problem and the generality of formal reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 24, 326–339.
Manktelow, K. I., & Evans, J. S. B. T. Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect? British Journal of Psychology, 1979, 70, 477–488.
Platt, J. R. Strong inference. Science, 1964, 146, 347–353.
Pollard, P. The effect of thematic content on the “Wason selection task.” Current Psychological Research, in press.
Pollard, P., & Evans, J. S. B. T. The effects of prior beliefs in reasoning: An associational interpretation. British Journal of Psychology, 1981, 72, 73–81.
Popper, K. Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & KeganPaul, 1963.
Van Duyne, P. C. Realism and linguistic complexity in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65, 59–67.
Van Duyne, P. C. Necessity and contingency in reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 1976, 40, 85–101.
Wason, P. C. Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 273–281.
Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. A conflict between selecting and evaluating information in an inferential task. British Journal of Psychology, 1970, 61, 509–515.
Wason, P. C., & Shapiro, D. Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 23, 63–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Michael E. Doherty and Irwin W. Silverman for their helpful comments on the conduct of this study, and Peter Wason and Richard Griggs for advice and discussions of the four-card task.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yachanin, S.A., Tweney, R.D. The effect of thematic content on cognitive strategies in the four-card selection task. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 19, 87–90 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330048
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330048