Abstract
Features are at the core of many empirical and modeling endeavors in the study of semantic concepts. This article is concerned with the delineation of features that are important in natural language concepts and the use of these features in the study of semantic concept representation. The results of a feature generation task in which the exemplars and labels of 15 semantic categories served as cues are described. The importance of the generated features was assessed by tallying the frequency with which they were generated and by obtaining judgments of their relevance. The generated attributes also featured in extensive exemplar by feature applicability matrices covering the 15 different categories, as well as two large semantic domains (that of animals and artifacts). For all exemplars of the 15 semantic categories, typicality ratings, goodness ratings, goodness rank order, generation frequency, exemplar associative strength, category associative strength, estimated age of acquisition, word frequency, familiarity ratings, imageability ratings, and pairwise similarity ratings are described as well. By making these data easily available to other researchers in the field, we hope to provide ample opportunities for continued investigations into the nature of semantic concept representation. These data may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society’s Archive of Norms, Stimuli, and Data, www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578–602.
Ameel, E., & Storms, G. (2006). From prototypes to caricatures: Geometrical models for concept typicality. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 402–421.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1978). Property dominance and typicality effects in property statement verification. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 155–164.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 340–357.
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211–227.
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 629–649.
Barton, M. E., & Komatsu, L. K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 433–447.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1–46.
Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling. New York: Springer.
Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & De Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition of words is a significant variable in semantic tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215–226.
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210.
Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95.
Casey, P. J. (1992). A re-examination of the roles of typicality and category dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 823–834.
Chumbley, J. I. (1986). The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 257–267.
Cohen, B. H., Bousfield, W. A., & Whitmarsh, G. A. (1957). Cultural norms for verbal items in 43 categories (Tech. Rep. 22). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. (1980). Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163–201.
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23, 371–414.
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2007). Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Acta Psychologica, 124, 274–295.
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 198–205.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 824–845.
Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77–94.
Diesendruck, G., & Gelman, S. A. (1999). Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 338–346.
Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., & Levy, J. P. (1997). The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 193–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Estes, Z. (2003). Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 31, 199–214.
Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Müller, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Hernandez, A. E. (2003). Distinct brain representations for early and late learned words. NeuroImage, 19, 1627–1637.
Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125–174.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.
Ghyselinck, M., Custers, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2003). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2332 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 181–241.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395–427.
Goldstone, R., & Son, J. Y. (2005). Similarity. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greer, M. J., van Casteren, M., McLellan, S. A., Moss, H. E., Rodd, J., Rogers, T. T., & Tyler, L. K. (2001). The emergence of semantic categories from distributed featural representations. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 358–363). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hahn, U., & Chater, N. (1997). Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories (pp. 43–92). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 441–461.
Hampton, J. A. (1981). An investigation of the nature of abstract concepts. Memory & Cognition, 9, 149–156.
Hampton, J. A., Dubois, D., & Yeh, W. (2006). Effects of classification context on categorization in natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1431–1443.
Hampton, J. A., & Gardiner, M. M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 491–516.
Henley, N. M. (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 176–184.
Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 721–742.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67–103.
Janczura, G. A., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Concept accessibility as the determinant of typicality judgments. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 1–19.
Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kittur, A., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2006). Dissociating typicality and goodness judgments: Category-based differences [Abstract]. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 47th Annual Meeting, 11, 120.
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Landauer, T. K., Ross, B. H., & Didner, R. S. (1979). Processing visually presented single words: A reaction time analysis [Tech. Memorandum]. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Laboratories.
Larochelle, S., & Pineau, H. (1994). Determinants of response times in the semantic verification task. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 796–823.
Larochelle, S., Richard, S., & Soulières, I. (2000). What some effects might not be: The time to verify membership in “well-defined” categories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 929–961.
Lee, M. D., & Navarro, D. J. (2002). Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 43–58.
Lorch, R. F. (1978). The role of two types of semantic information in the processing of false sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 523–537.
Malt, B. C., & Johnson, C. E. (1992). Do artifact concepts have cores? Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 195–217.
Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 250–269.
Maridaki-Kassotaki, K. (1997). Are rating-based procedures reliable for derivation of typicality judgments from children? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 376–385.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 517–535.
Markman, A. B., & Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 54–70.
Martin, R. C., & Caramazza, A. (1980). Classification in well-defined and ill-defined categories: Evidence for common processing strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 320–353.
McCloskey, M. [E.] (1980). The stimulus familiarity problem in semantic memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 485–502.
McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462–472.
McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1979). Decision-processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1–37.
McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Category specificity in brain and mind (pp. 211–249). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547–559.
McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99–130.
Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960–983.
Mervis, C. B., Catlin, J., & Rosch, E. (1976). Relationships among goodness-of-example, category norms, and word frequency. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 283–284.
Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.
Monaco, J. D., Abbott, L. F., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). Lexico-semantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Learning & Memory, 14, 204–213.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.
Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 167–180.
Murphy, G. L. (1982). Cue validity and levels of categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 174–177.
Paivio, A. U. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. U. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377–500.
Pruzansky, S., Tversky, A., & Carroll, J. D. (1982). Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data. Psychometrika, 47, 3–24.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reilly, J., & Kean, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high- and low imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science, 31, 157–168.
Rips, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 665–681.
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20.
Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., Mc-Clelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). The structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205–235.
Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–49). London: Academic Press.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Grey, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., & Storms, G. (2004). Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 506–515.
Ruts, W., Storms, G., & Hampton, J. (2004). Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 32, 83–95.
Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104.
Shepard, R. N., & Arabie, P. (1979). Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. Psychological Review, 86, 87–123.
Shoben, E. J. (1976). The verification of semantic relations in a same-different paradigm: An asymmetry in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 365–379.
Shoben, E. J. (1983). Applications of multidimensional scaling in cognitive psychology. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 473–490.
Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., & Ahn, W. K. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189–228.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214–241.
Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1411–1436.
Smits, T., Storms, G., Rosseel, Y., & De Boeck, P. (2002). Fruits and vegetables categorized: An application of the generalized context model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 836–844.
Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41–78.
Storms, G. (2001). Flemish category norms for exemplars of 39 categories: A replication of the Battig and Montague (1969) category norms. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 145–168.
Storms, G., & De Boeck, P. (1997). Formal models for intracategorical structure that can be used for data-analysis. In K. Lamberts & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts, and categories (pp. 439–459). London: UCL Press.
Storms, G., De Boeck, P., & Ruts, W. (2000). Prototype and exemplar based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 51–73.
Storms, G., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Geeraerts, D. (1993). Dominance and noncommutativity effects in concept conjunctions: Extensional or intensional basis? Memory & Cognition, 21, 752–762.
Storms, G., Dirikx, T., Saerens, J., Verstraeten, S., & De Deyn, P. P. (2003). On the use of scaling and clustering in the study of semantic disruptions. Neuropsychology, 17, 289–301.
Storms, G., Van Mechelen, I., & De Boeck, P. (1994). Structural analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 43–75.
Sutcliffe, J. P. (1993). Concepts, class, and category in the tradition of Aristotle. In I. Van Mechelen, J. A. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 35–65). London: Academic Press.
Tenenbaum, J. B. (1996). Learning the structure of similarity. In D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, & M. E. Hasselmo (Eds.), Neural information processing systems (Vol. 8, pp. 3–9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain & Language, 75, 195–231.
van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1989). Eigenschappen van basiswoorden. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Van Mechelen, I., Hampton, J. A., Michalski, R. S., & Theuns, P. (1993). Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis. London: Academic Press.
Vanoverberghe, V., & Storms, G. (2003). Feature importance in feature generation and typicality rating. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–18.
Verbeemen, T., Vanpaemel, W., Pattyn, S., Storms, G., & Verguts, T. (2007). Beyond exemplars and prototypes as memory representations of natural concepts: A clustering approach. Journal of Memory & Language, 56, 537–554.
Verheyen, S., Ameel, E., & Storms, G. (2007). Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 427–438.
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829–854.
Zannino, G. D., Perri, R., Pasqualetti, P., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2006). Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 515–540.
Zannino, G. D., Perri, R., Pasqualetti, P., Di Paola, M., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2006). The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: Evidence from a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1017–1028.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research presented in this article was partly sponsored by Grants OT/05/27 and IDO/02/004 from the University of Leuven Research Council and Grant G.0513.08 from the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, awarded to G.S. The first four authors contributed equally to the data-gathering procedures and to the construction of the archived files.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., Ameel, E. et al. Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts. Behavior Research Methods 40, 1030–1048 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030