Abstract
In four experiments, rats were trained on different patterning discriminations before being tested with compounds composed of novel combinations of the trained stimuli. In Experiment 1, rats were trained on a negative-patterning schedule (A+ B+ AB-) intermixed with reinforced presentations of a second compound (CD+). On a subsequent test, the rats responded more to two novel compounds, AC and BD, than to A and B, but less than to CD. In Experiment 2, rats were trained on two concurrent negative-patterning discriminations (A+ B+ AB-, C+ D+ CD-). On test, they responded more to AC and BD than to AB and CD, but less than to the single stimuli. In Experiment 3, rats were trained on two concurrent positive-patterning discriminations (A-B- AB+, C- D- CD+). On test, their response rates to AC and BD were not different from the response rates to the trained compounds (AB and CD). Finally, in Experiment 4, rats were trained on a positive- and negative-patterning discrimination concurrently. Once again, on test, response rates to AC and BD were not different from responding on reinforced trials of the trained discriminations (A+, B+, and CD+). We discuss the implications of these findings for elemental and configural models of stimulus representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C., & Estes, W. K. (1963). Stimulus sampling theory. In R. D. Luce, R. B. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121–268). New York: Wiley.
Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination. Psychological Review, 58, 413–423. doi:10.1037/h0054576
Estes, W. K. (1950). Towards a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94–107. doi:10.1037/h0058559
Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.584
Harris, J. A., Livesey, E. J., Gharaei, S., & Westbrook, R. F. (2008). Negative patterning is easier than a biconditional discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 494–500. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.4.494
Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243. doi:10.1080/02724990344000141
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi:10.1037/h0076778
McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 177–200.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). New York: Dover.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61
Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.587
Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 73–95.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
Pearce, J. M., & Redhead, E. S. (1993). The influence of an irrelevant stimulus on two discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 180–190. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.19.2.180
Rescorla, R. A. (1972). “Configural” conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 79, 307–317. doi:10.1037/h0032553
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Spence, K. W. (1952). The nature of the response in discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 59, 89–93. doi:10.1037/h0063067
Thein, T., Westbrook, R. F., & Harris, J. A. (2008). How the associative strengths of stimuli combine in compound: Summation and overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 155–166. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.155
Wagner, A. R. (2003). Context-sensitive elemental theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 7–29. doi:10.1080/02724990244000133
Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Whitlow, J. W., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configural components. Psychonomic Science, 27, 299–301.
Williams, D. A., Gawel, J. D., Reimer, D. S., & Mehta, R. (2005). Resistance to interference in complex negative patterning. Learning & Behavior, 33, 417–427.
Williams, D. A., Mehta, R., & Dumont, J.-L. (2004). Conditions favoring superconditioning of irrelevant conditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 148–159. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Discovery Grant DP0451764 from the Australian Research Council. The authors thank Bob Boakes, Fred Westbrook, and Evan Livesey for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, J.A., Gharaei, S. & Moore, C.A. Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning. Learning & Behavior 37, 230–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.3.230
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.3.230