Abstract
Numerical competence has been studied in animals under a variety of conditions, but only a few experiments have reported animals’ ability to detect absolute number. Capaldi and Miller (1988) tested rats’ ability to detect absolute number by using biologically important events—the number of reinforced runs followed by a nonreinforced run—and found that the rats ran significantly slower on the nonreinforced run. In the present experiments, we used a similar procedure. Pigeons were given a sequence of trials in which responding on the first three trials ended in reinforcement but responding on the fourth trial did not (RRRN). When the response requirement on each trial was a single peck (Experiment 1), we found no significant increase in latency to peck on the fourth trial. When the response requirement was increased to 10 pecks (Experiment 2), however, the time to complete the peck requirement was significantly longer on the nonreinforced trial than on the reinforced trials. Tests for control by time, number of responses, and amount of food consumed indicated that the pigeons were using primarily the number of reinforcements obtained in each sequence as a cue for nonreinforcement. This procedure represents a sensitive and efficient method for studying numerical competence in animals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsop, B., & Honig, W. K. (1991). Sequential stimuli and relative numerosity discriminations in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 386–395.
Boysen, S. T., Berntson, G. G., Hannan, M. B., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 76–86.
Brannon, E. M. (2006). The representation of numerical magnitude. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 222–229.
Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (2000). Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 31–49.
Burns, R. A., & Sanders, R. E. (1987). Concurrent counting of two and three events in a serial anticipation paradigm. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 479–481.
Capaldi, E. J., & Miller, D. J. (1988). Counting in rats: Its functional significance and the independent cognitive processes that constitute it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 3–17.
Capaldi, E. J., Miller, D. J., & Alptekin, S. (1989). A conditional numerical discrimination based on qualitatively different reinforcers. Learning & Motivation, 20, 48–59.
Davis, H., & Pérusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 561–615.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emmerton, J. (1998). Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons’ discrimination performance. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 243–256.
Emmerton, J. (2001). Birds’ judgments of number and quantity. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/emmerton
Emmerton, J., Lohmann, A., & Niemann, J. (1997). Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 234–244.
Evans, T. A., Beran, M. J., Harris, E. H., & Rice, D. F. (2009). Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12, 97–105.
Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2005). On the limits of infants’ quantification of small object arrays. Cognition, 97, 295–313.
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.
Fetterman, J. G. (1993). Numerosity discrimination: Both time and number matter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 149–164.
Gallistel, C. R. (1989). Animal cognition: The representation of space, time and number. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 155–189.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hirai, S., & Jitsumori, M. (2009). Counting absolute numbers of items, from 1 to 8, in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 37, 365–379.
Hurwitz, H. M. B. (1962). Some properties of behaviour under fixedratio and counting schedules. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 167–173.
Keen, R., & Machado, A. (1999). How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 151–175.
Knorn, H.-J. (1987). Visuelle Diskriminationsleistung von Tauben und Menschen beim simultanen Punktmengenvergleich [Visual discrimination performance of pigeons and humans when simultaneously comparing dot quantities]. Unpublished Diplomarbeit, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Koehler, O. (1941). Vom Erlernen unbenannter Anzahlen bei Vögeln [On the learning of unnamed numerosities by birds.] Naturwissenschaften, 29, 201–218.
Machado A., & Keen, R. (2002). Relative numerosity discrimination in the pigeon: Further tests of the linear-exponential-ratio model. Behavioural Processes, 57, 131–148.
Mechner, F. (1958). Probability relations within response sequences under ratio reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 109–121.
Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320–334.
Nieder, A. (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 177–190.
Pepperberg, I. M. (1994). Numerical competence in an African Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 36–44.
Platt, J. R., & Johnson, D. M. (1971). Localization of position within a homogenous behavior chain: Effects of error contingencies. Learning & Motivation, 2, 386–414.
Rilling, M. (1967). Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 63, 60–65.
Rilling, M. (1993). Invisible counting animals: A history of contributions from comparative psychology, ethology, and learning theory. In S. T. Boysen & E. J. Capaldi (Eds.), The development of numerical competence: Animal and human models (pp. 3–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rilling, M., & McDiarmid, C. (1965). Signal detection in fixed-ratio schedules. Science, 148, 526–527.
Roberts, W. A., & Boisvert, M. J. (1998). Using the peak procedure to measure timing and counting processes in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 416–430.
Roberts, W. A., Coughlin, R., & Roberts, S. (2000). Pigeons flexibly time or count on cue. Psychological Science, 11, 218–222.
Roberts, W. A., & Mitchell, S. (1994). Can a pigeon simultaneously process temporal and numerical information? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 66–78.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Meyer, B. (1970). Chronic fear and ulceration in rats as a function of unpredictability of safety. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 73, 202–207.
Suzuki, K., & Kobayashi, T. (2000). Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis and Bradford (1986) extended. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 73–85.
Watanabe, S. (1998). Discrimination of “four“ and “two“ by pigeons. Psychological Record, 48, 383–391.
Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130–137.
Xia, L., Emmerton, J., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (2001). Pigeons (Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 83–91.
Xia, L., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (2000). Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons. Animal Cognition, 3, 35–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayburn-Reeves, R.M., Miller, H.C. & Zentall, T.R. “counting” by pigeons: Discrimination of the number of biologically relevant sequential events. Learning & Behavior 38, 169–176 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.38.2.169
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.38.2.169