Abstract
Experiments were conducted to contrast the predictions from exemplar models and rule-based decisionboundary models of perceptual classification. Observers classified multidimensional stimuli into categories that could be described in terms of easily verbalized logical rules. The critical manipulation was that some pairs of stimuli received probabilistic feedback, whereas other control pairs received deterministic feedback. Despite the probabilistic feedback, the probabilistic pairs and the deterministic pairs were the same distance from idealobserver, rule-based decision boundaries. Across two experiments with varying category structures, observers classified the probabilistic pairs with slower response times (RTs) and lower accuracies than the comparison deterministic pairs. The effects were relatively long term, extending into test blocks in which all feedback was withheld. The results were as predicted by exemplar models, but challenged models that posit that RT is a function solely of the distance of a stimulus from rule-based boundaries. The studies add considerable generality to previous ones and suggest that, even in domains involving rule-based category structures, exemplar-retrieval processes play a significant role. Supplemental materials related to this article may be downloaded from http:// mc.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3–19.
Ashby, F. G. (2000). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 310–329.
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481.
Ashby, F. G., Boynton, G., & Lee, W. W. (1994). Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 11–27.
Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 33–53.
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of perceptual separability and perceptual integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 423–466.
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149–178.
Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154–179.
Cohen, A. L., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2003). An extension of the exemplar-based random-walk model to separable-dimension stimuli. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 150–165.
Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107–140.
Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630–633.
Fific, M., Little, D. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2010). Logical-rule models of classification response times: An integration of mental- architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Psychological Review, 117, 309–348.
Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 108–154.
Jones, M., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2006). Recency effects as a window to generalization: Separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 316–332.
Lafond, D., Lacouture, Y., & Cohen, A. L. (2009). Decision tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments. Psychological Review, 116, 833–855.
Lamberts, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161–180.
Lamberts, K. (1998). The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 695–711.
Lamberts, K. (2000). Information accumulation theory of categorization response times. Psychological Review, 107, 227–260.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 795–817.
Maddox, W. T., Filoteo, J. V., Heil, K. D., & Ing, A. D. (2004). Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: Further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 227–245.
Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based randomwalk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266–300.
Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plusexception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53–79.
Nosofsky, R. M., & Stanton, R. D. (2005). Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: Contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision- boundary, and prototype models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 608–629.
Petrov, A. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2005). The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. Psychological Review, 112, 383–416.
Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92–114.
Rouder, J. N., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Comparing categorization models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 63–82.
Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54–87.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 3–11.
Vandierendonck, A. (1995). A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 442–459.
Verguts, T., Storms, G., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2003). Decision-bound theory and the influence of familiarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 141–148.
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Grants FA9550-08-1-0486 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and MH48494 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nosofsky, R.M., Little, D.R. Classification response times in probabilistic rule-based category structures: Contrasting exemplar-retrieval and decision-boundary models. Memory & Cognition 38, 916–927 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.916
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.916